<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for John Koetsier</title><link>http://disqus.com/people/6d4d24b12c84be6eecddf121bc3fee48/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 20:05:13 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Why Google, Yahoo, and Microsoft are NOT Competing</title><link>http://getanewbrowser.disqus.com/why_google_yahoo_and_microsoft_are_not_competing/#comment-11741564</link><description>This:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;"Microsoft’s future is providing the platform for the distribution and dissemination of information."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt; ... is an interesting quote when you consider Apple's successes in exactly that sphere and Microsoft's notable misses. Just add "creation" to the distribution and dissemination and it'll be close to right.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Koetsier</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 01 Dec 2006 01:46:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Automatically Add Marketing Content to Your Web Site</title><link>http://ducttapemarketing.disqus.com/automatically_add_marketing_content_to_your_web_site/#comment-8127223</link><description>That page looks AWFULLY scamish ... and the one testimonial on the page links to a single-page site with very similar characteristics (exactly the same page width, for instance).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;You'll have to give some more information about this to make it more credible in my eyes.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Koetsier</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 10 Aug 2006 17:40:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Automatically Add Marketing Content to Your Web Site</title><link>http://ducttapemarketing.disqus.com/automatically_add_marketing_content_to_your_web_site/#comment-8127226</link><description>"nobody is trying to sell you anything"&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Actually, you are. The link you provided includes your affiliate ID ... so that you'll benefit financially if people follow it and use the site's services.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Nothing wrong with that - don't get me wrong - but mentioning it would be a little more straightforward.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Koetsier</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 20 Aug 2006 21:32:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Social Media is No Place for Robot Behavior</title><link>http://chrisbrogan.disqus.com/social_media_is_no_place_for_robot_behavior/#comment-8531908</link><description>Coincidence, coincidence ....&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Could it be that posting every 2 minutes on Twitter is a symptom of "robotic" posting behaviour? I tend to think so.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I was thinking about that this morning:&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://sparkplug9.com/2008/12/28/how-to-get-un-followed-on-twitter/" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://sparkplug9.com/2008/12/28/how-to-get-un-...&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Koetsier</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2008 01:19:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Media Consumption: Scoble vs Rubel</title><link>http://newcommbiz.disqus.com/media_consumption_scoble_vs_rubel/#comment-9086184</link><description>Interesting!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I think I fall somewhere down the middle ... not so highly organized in my consumption as Steve Rubel, but nowhere near the firehouse to my mouth as Scoble.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;(Perhaps that's why I don't need to be quite as organized as Rubel!)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Koetsier</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 20:05:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How Microsoft can shut down Mini-Microsoft</title><link>http://scobleizer.disqus.com/how_microsoft_can_shut_down_mini_microsoft/#comment-9637752</link><description>Scoble: Congrats on this post, but more on the thinking behind it.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Some of your ideas are wacky and far-out, but that's the magic of them. And some of them are just simple basic common-sense.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Even partial implementation would have huge positive impact on most companies.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Koetsier</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 25 Apr 2006 18:33:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: New Sony, Old Sony</title><link>http://scobleizer.disqus.com/new_sony_old_sony/#comment-9638368</link><description>That looks so awesome and yummy I can almost forget that I - don't - actually - watch - much - TV ... and don't want to watch as much as I already do watch.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;On another topic: why are you not filthy rich, Robert? You are one of the most important people at Microsoft, whether or not they realize it, and should obviously be paying you more.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;(Or should I chalk up your occasional can't-afford-this-or-that comments to the astronomical prices of Seattle real estate?)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Koetsier</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 01 May 2006 17:39:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Windows more reliable than RedHat Linux? Yes, says Yankee Group</title><link>http://scobleizer.disqus.com/windows_more_reliable_than_redhat_linux_yes_says_yankee_group/#comment-9641281</link><description>Hrm, the Yankee group has a well-publicized history of questionable techniques to perhaps manipulate survey results in favor of Windows.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Example:&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.businessweek.com/the_thread/techbeat/archives/2005/04/the_truth_about_1.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.businessweek.com/the_thread/techbeat...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Sorry, Scoble, but I wouldn't trust anything that came out of that organization.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Koetsier</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 06 Jun 2006 15:45:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Hello from the road</title><link>http://scobleizer.disqus.com/hello_from_the_road/#comment-9645344</link><description>Robert, are you crazy? (Rhetorical question.)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Publishing your cell number on your blog ... sheesh, I wonder how many calls you'll get. And how many of them will be worthwhile.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Actually ....&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;You should get some kind of recording capability on your cell, and then publish them as a podcast here.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;That could be cool.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Koetsier</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 12 Jul 2006 00:38:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Looking at Vista</title><link>http://scobleizer.disqus.com/looking_at_vista/#comment-9647728</link><description>Nothing like a real opinion to bring out the sharp knives and hateful comments.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Scoble, I know that getting a lot of comments that are negative, nasty, and just plain stupid can start to weigh on you sometimes - don't let it.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thanks for your blog and for calling 'em as you see 'em.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Koetsier</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 01 Aug 2006 15:51:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Wordpress.com getting new features</title><link>http://scobleizer.disqus.com/wordpresscom_getting_new_features/#comment-9648455</link><description>Wordpress does have the best spam protection in the world, and that's because it's a distributed system that, when you say something is spam, knows it's spam for Uncle Joe's blog too.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Akismet is the technology, and I blogged about it here:&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.sparkplug9.com/bizhack/index.php/2006/06/13/askismet-a-bloggers-life-saver/" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.sparkplug9.com/bizhack/index.php/200...&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Koetsier</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 15 Aug 2006 23:55:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Video from Burning Man</title><link>http://scobleizer.disqus.com/video_from_burning_man/#comment-9651857</link><description>Scoble,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Off-topic I know: SORRY! But I know email won't reach you.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;There is a major issue with Technorati that seems to be hitting C, D, E, and Z-list bloggers that none of us can seem to get an answer or solution to. I've tried multiple Support requests, email to Dave Sifry, posts on his blog ... no response.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Can you help by publicizing it? Please.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Details and links to others having the same issue:&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.sparkplug9.com/bizhack/index.php/2006/08/30/sound-of-one-blog-clapping/" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.sparkplug9.com/bizhack/index.php/200...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thanks!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Koetsier</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 31 Aug 2006 21:07:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: It&amp;#8217;s the small things at Google that impress</title><link>http://scobleizer.disqus.com/it8217s_the_small_things_at_google_that_impress/#comment-9651904</link><description>If only, only, only Technorati had the same listening attitude.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Robert, did you see my comment on the previous post? Are you able to help?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Koetsier</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 01 Sep 2006 11:45:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Don&amp;#8217;t send bloggers stuff for free unless it&amp;#8217;s good</title><link>http://scobleizer.disqus.com/don8217t_send_bloggers_stuff_for_free_unless_it8217s_good/#comment-9654208</link><description>This is hilarious. If your product sucks, keep it away from geeks and bloggers at all costs.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Advertise in dead tree publications. Advertise on network TV. Anywhere smart technical people aren't.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And hope like heck they won't find you.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Koetsier</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 19 Sep 2006 23:58:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Riding Theresa&amp;#8217;s horse on her videoblog</title><link>http://scobleizer.disqus.com/riding_theresa8217s_horse_on_her_videoblog/#comment-9654763</link><description>What I want Technorati to have up its sleeve is A SERVICE THAT ACTUALLY FREAKING WORKS.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;At least most of the time.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Koetsier</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 25 Sep 2006 23:32:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Dave&amp;#8217;s new HD rocks</title><link>http://scobleizer.disqus.com/dave8217s_new_hd_rocks/#comment-9657680</link><description>I think I get what Dave's talking about, and I understand where Robert is coming from, but life-changing?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;As I said on my blog: Dave may need to get out more.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.sparkplug9.com/bizhack/index.php/2006/10/23/hdtv-a-life-changer/" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.sparkplug9.com/bizhack/index.php/200...&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Koetsier</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 24 Oct 2006 00:47:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Jason Calacanis on the loose?</title><link>http://scobleizer.disqus.com/jason_calacanis_on_the_loose/#comment-9660487</link><description>Calacanis was the only reason anyone intelligent paid any attention to AOL, period. Incredible that they'd let him walk.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Koetsier</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 17 Nov 2006 04:44:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Help a San Jose Mercury News columnist blog</title><link>http://scobleizer.disqus.com/help_a_san_jose_mercury_news_columnist_blog/#comment-9662638</link><description>Yes, I have some advice for Mike: &lt;b&gt;Get linked to by Scoble.&lt;/b&gt; Oh, oops, already done. Check!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Koetsier</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 07 Dec 2006 16:02:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Congrats John</title><link>http://scobleizer.disqus.com/congrats_john/#comment-9665314</link><description>I really hope that comment is tongue-in-cheek, John, 'cause otherwise you come off as a real asshole.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Koetsier</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 2007 23:54:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Achievements are how Microsoft is gonna edge in on Google</title><link>http://scobleizer.disqus.com/achievements_are_how_microsoft_is_gonna_edge_in_on_google/#comment-9665775</link><description>You "earned an achievement?" Do you know how unbelievably asinine that sounds?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I love geek gadgets far more than most, but please, can we have grown men act like it. My kids earn neopoints on &lt;a href="http://neopets.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;neopets.com&lt;/a&gt;, and they're really happy that they've got 90+ thousand of them. I never would have thought that adults would get sucked into the same marketing/ego/nonsense vortex.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I hate this "adultescent" stuff.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Koetsier</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 05 Jan 2007 12:49:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Cisco smacks back at Apple on its blog</title><link>http://scobleizer.disqus.com/cisco_smacks_back_at_apple_on_its_blog/#comment-9666699</link><description>If you read Cisco's blog posting, it's clear that this was not a licensing issue or a money issue. Rather, Cisco wanted to partner with Apple.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Well ... that's a much different animal, and something that Apple does not do easily or often.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;My take:&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.sparkplug9.com/bizhack/2007/01/10/why-apple-left-cisco-at-the-altar/" rel="nofollow"&gt;Why Apple left Cisco at the alter&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Koetsier</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 11 Jan 2007 03:00:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The $10,000 Gnomedex</title><link>http://scobleizer.disqus.com/the_10000_gnomedex/#comment-9678098</link><description>John C. Welch: that's a meaningless comment.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Outside of their constituency, no-one has any influence. But Scoble obviously has more influence (just on the blog, never mind FC) than just about any corner preacher ... at least in terms of immediately visible impact and numbers of readers/hearers.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Sure, Robert's constituency is narrow when compared to the whole world. So's just about anyone's. How wide is yours?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Koetsier</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2007 17:01:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Interview about Google Gears</title><link>http://scobleizer.disqus.com/interview_about_google_gears/#comment-9680344</link><description>This is very, very timely. Gears is a big, big deal, as it also really reduces the complexities of writing apps for desktop ... and gives you global sync for free!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Sorta like Mozilla XUL but understandable and connected.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Koetsier</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2007 17:19:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Not yet on TechCrunch: killer video search engine (ClipBlast)</title><link>http://scobleizer.disqus.com/not_yet_on_techcrunch_killer_video_search_engine_clipblast/#comment-9682518</link><description>Clipblast sucked on a simple search that I tried:&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.sparkplug9.com/bizhack/2007/06/22/clipblast-well-that-sucked/" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.sparkplug9.com/bizhack/2007/06/22/cl...&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Koetsier</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 22 Jun 2007 14:26:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Jakob Nielsen says &amp;#8220;don&amp;#8217;t be like Scoble&amp;#8221;</title><link>http://scobleizer.disqus.com/jakob_nielsen_says_8220don8217t_be_like_scoble8221/#comment-9685444</link><description>Scoble,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Personalities, history, and foibles aside, there are many roads that lead to Rome, and Neilsen has picked out one that works for him.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;He's specifically targeting that method to less than 1% of the population, and specifically targeting that method to in-depth, complex, multi-faceted business challenges.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;As such, that makes perfect sense.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Your blog, on the other hand, is short bits that invariably link elsewhere, keeping reading on top of developing news, conversations, trends, etc. Totally different purpose, totally different form, totally different style.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;He is Encyclopedia Britannica; you are watercooler. Both are good, both are needed, both are valuable.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;They're just different.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;(And btw, yes, his design sucks, and yes, he needs to update it.)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Koetsier</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 10 Jul 2007 18:53:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: JimDo: not your father&amp;#8217;s FrontPage</title><link>http://scobleizer.disqus.com/jimdo_not_your_father8217s_frontpage/#comment-9687515</link><description>Scoble,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&amp;gt; But if you are looking to build an online Web site&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;What if I just want to build an offline website?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;(Sorry, that's my smartass moment of the day!)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Koetsier</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2007 13:21:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Buzzwire: audio and video for your cell phone</title><link>http://scobleizer.disqus.com/buzzwire_audio_and_video_for_your_cell_phone/#comment-9687710</link><description>Why would I want to "bring audio, video reports along with Internet radio stations" to my cell phone?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I hate my cell phone. All it's somewhat acceptable for is taking and making calls.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Of course, it's not an iPhone, but if I had an iPhone (not available in Canada yet, btw) then why would I need this service? I'd just go the the web and get what I want.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;All these companies providing custom portals into web content are behind the curve.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Koetsier</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2007 15:00:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Yelp events compared to Upcoming; Incoming &amp;#8220;bacn&amp;#8221;</title><link>http://scobleizer.disqus.com/yelp_events_compared_to_upcoming_incoming_8220bacn8221/#comment-9688964</link><description>Scoble,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&amp;gt; I know you’re getting sick of hearing&lt;br&gt;&amp;gt; me talk about Facebook but it is now&lt;br&gt;&amp;gt; the MUST HAVE portal for my digital life&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I love this ... knowing that you have the attention span of a fruit fly, I wonder what your MUST HAVE social networking portal will be in a year or so.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I'm sure it'll be something different, and I'm sure it'll be something interesting, and I'm sure we'll be hearing all about it on your blog.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;:-)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Koetsier</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 26 Aug 2007 12:56:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: I&amp;#8217;ve redesigned</title><link>http://scobleizer.disqus.com/i8217ve_redesigned/#comment-9704362</link><description>Very nice, very nice.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Comic strip blogger: Scoble is often a test bed for testing of new technology. Just wait, you'll probably be able to do it as well pretty soon.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Koetsier</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 17:54:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Canon takes good PR and throws it in the trash</title><link>http://scobleizer.disqus.com/canon_takes_good_pr_and_throws_it_in_the_trash/#comment-9710084</link><description>Wow. The cluetrain has so come and gone ... and yet so many have not even taken a look out the window.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Koetsier</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2008 02:34:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Blogging, changing every day</title><link>http://scobleizer.disqus.com/blogging_changing_every_day/#comment-9710058</link><description>Robert,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&amp;gt;Most of my blogger friends think I’m nuts focusing so much&lt;br&gt;&amp;gt;effort over on FriendFeed.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;They're right. You're a digital sharecropper (a la Nick Carr) building a business for someone else while your own is suffering. The reality is that if you played your cards right you'd be making multiple thousands per month off your own blog ... and wouldn't have to whine about not being able to afford the new Canon.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;:-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Seriously, I think you can do that without losing credibility. Long-term, it makes much more sense for you.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Koetsier</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2008 02:39:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Got a real-time ego problem? Get a room!</title><link>http://scobleizer.disqus.com/got_a_real_time_ego_problem_get_a_room/#comment-9713263</link><description>Wow, Scoble is blogging again.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;:-)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Koetsier</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2009 18:26:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Jive finishes up my enterprise disruption week</title><link>http://scobleizer.disqus.com/jive_finishes_up_my_enterprise_disruption_week/#comment-9713380</link><description>Another company that does very interesting and similar things (customer collaboration in product development and marketing, as well as internal "web2.0" social networks) is ThinkPassenger.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I interviewed with them about 6 months ago and they are doing some very interesting things with Fortune 500 companies, including Apple.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;(Of course, the Apple stuff is all internal.)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Koetsier</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 04 Jan 2009 03:10:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A Free Zune or iPod to One Lucky MyBlogLog Community Member</title><link>http://marketingpilgrim.disqus.com/a_free_zune_or_ipod_to_one_lucky_mybloglog_community_member/#comment-9410912</link><description>OK, fine, I'll enter the contest. But I want an iPod, not a crappy Zune.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;:-)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Koetsier</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2007 22:37:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Getting your Blog to the &amp;#8220;A-List&amp;#8221;</title><link>http://marketingtechnologyblog.disqus.com/getting_your_blog_to_the_8220a_list8221/#comment-11016799</link><description>Way to go - totally agree.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I developed a &lt;a href="http://www.sparkplug9.com/bizhack/index.php/2006/08/16/a-lister-conspiracy-theories-and-dreams-of-easy-success/" rel="nofollow"&gt;few thoughts on this A-lister conspiracy&lt;/a&gt; myself.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt; . . .&lt;br&gt; . . .&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Big kudos on the "quasi-marketing-technology-geek-Christian-father dude" bit, btw. I could describe myself the same way!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;:-)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Koetsier</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 17 Aug 2006 22:40:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 5 Bizarre Tips to Double Your Productivity</title><link>http://marketingtechnologyblog.disqus.com/5_bizarre_tips_to_double_your_productivity/#comment-11018884</link><description>Great post - love it. Much better than the endless lists of 20-30 productivity tips that you can't even remember, never mind implement.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Koetsier</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2007 17:04:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: WordPress Contact Form with Spam Protection Version 2.0.0 Released!</title><link>http://marketingtechnologyblog.disqus.com/wordpress_contact_form_with_spam_protection_version_200_released/#comment-11018994</link><description>Douglas, that rocks. Thanks so much for making such a great plugin that I've already found useful on a site I did for a non-profit and I think I'll find useful again on a site I'm doing for my artist brother-in-law.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Koetsier</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2007 14:55:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Rogers is experiencing iPhone activation problems</title><link>http://iphonew.disqus.com/rogers_is_experiencing_iphone_activation_problems/#comment-10831350</link><description>I was in a Rogers store this morning and waited hours and hours for their servers to perk up ... I finally got out without finishing, but with an iPhone that I could finish setting up in iTunes.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Annoying, but at least I now have a 3G iPhone.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Interestingly, the store I was at had only 3 16GB iPhones. I was third in line and got one ...</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Koetsier</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 11 Jul 2008 23:12:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Metaholic</title><link>http://thelastminute.disqus.com/metaholic/#comment-16838138</link><description>Is it just me or is this blog user-hostile design? A little more contrast between the text and the background white would be a major step forward.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Koetsier</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Oct 2006 02:22:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Networking and numbers</title><link>http://jimsmarketingblog.disqus.com/networking_and_numbers/#comment-11633097</link><description>Ummm ... am I the only one who get the irony here?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It's all about the quality of the relationships, but you have 18,000 followers?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;How 'quality' can those relationships possibly be? Have you personally corresponded with each of them?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;There's nothing wrong with that many followers. And it can be a 'relationship' of mutual interest. But it is not a high quality personal relationship.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Koetsier</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 11 Jan 2009 11:40:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Online file storage from ... Dilbert?</title><link>http://techflash.disqus.com/online_file_storage_from_dilbert/#comment-15674212</link><description>I think it's kind of funny, myself:&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://sparkplug9.com/dilbertfilescom-not-just-a-comic-strip/" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://sparkplug9.com/dilbertfilescom-not-just-...&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Koetsier</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 10:04:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Who Will Make Money with User-Generated Online Video?</title><link>http://publishing20.disqus.com/who_will_make_money_with_user_generated_online_video/#comment-13568196</link><description>Interesting ... I wonder about YouTube changing its terms of use - I'm certainly less likely to use it for my webcasts if they can just take the content and use it however they want.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;BTW, I've been following your blog for some time in Bloglines, and you may not have noticed but you are one of the inaugaural members of the SLOB awards:&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.sparkplug9.com/bizhack/index.php/slob-hall-of-fame/" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.sparkplug9.com/bizhack/index.php/slo...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If you wish, you can display the SLOB logo on your site or in a post. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;:-)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Koetsier</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 31 Jul 2006 19:21:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: If Only There Were More Danny Sullivans</title><link>http://publishing20.disqus.com/if_only_there_were_more_danny_sullivans/#comment-13568329</link><description>Not only how rare people like Danny are in general ... but how rare they are in his industry. Or, should I say, the wider industry of SEO experts.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Koetsier</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 30 Aug 2006 22:49:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Zen of 2.0</title><link>http://publishing20.disqus.com/the_zen_of_20/#comment-13568332</link><description>What does this *mean*:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&amp;gt;&amp;gt;I think the evolution we are seeing at the convergence &lt;br&gt;&amp;gt;&amp;gt;of media and technology can be described as shift from &lt;br&gt;&amp;gt;&amp;gt;Western constructs to more Eastern constructs.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I know it's popular to say things like that, but what is "western" and what is "eastern?" And don't tell me that Eastern is more simple, or more connected, or more social. The "east" is a lot more complicate than that, and not reducible to simple stereotypes.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And I'm not sure what you mean by the Zen of 2.0. In what sense are you using the word "zen?" Zen philosophy is about experiencing now-ness and simplicity and understanding the real nature of things, which may lie under the surface reality. In your paragraph about Google you give an example without actually saying what the "different" way is.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Sorry, but I think this post is a lot of hot air: explanatory without explaining. Sounds good, but no substance.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I know what web 2.0 is intuitively. I experience web 2.0 by being able to participate in an online space. Your explanation introduces unnecessary concepts and clouds what it is supposed to make clear.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;However, I guess that's OK in a koan-style epigrammatic ambiguity that sounds really deep but has no actually semantic value.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Koetsier</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 01 Sep 2006 18:59:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google Wants To Own the Business of Content</title><link>http://publishing20.disqus.com/google_wants_to_own_the_business_of_content/#comment-13569147</link><description>This is not surprising:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.sparkplug9.com/bizhack/index.php/2006/10/24/of-course-google-wants-to-own-the-business-of-content/" rel="nofollow"&gt;Of course Google wants to own the business of content&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Koetsier</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 24 Oct 2006 11:47:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Does All Advertising Want to Be Free?</title><link>http://publishing20.disqus.com/does_all_advertising_want_to_be_free/#comment-13569159</link><description>Either I'm stupid, and too quickly jumping to what I think is the obvious response to your post, Scott, or you're missing something really obvious.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Conversations are slow, by and large, because they require the formation of some level of relationship. Sure, there's the occasional viral shooting star that jumps to huge numbers very quickly, but for most companies, building audience is long, hard, slow work.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Good work, and rewarding work, but long and slow.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Advertising is a way to short-cut that process ... a way to speed up awareness levels that then buy you the opportunity to have a conversation with a potential client, which in turn buys you the opportunity to potentially make a sale.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Let's face it: not everyone who needs office cleaning done in Anytown is going to jump on MySpace to find a janitor. And not every janitorial firm will rank in the first few Google results, particularly if they're new to the new media game.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;So advertising is a way to pay to get on that first page. Maybe it's temporary. Maybe you abandon it when you get big and smart and popular enough.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But it's a good kick-start.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Koetsier</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 26 Oct 2006 00:34:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Blog Herald Column: If No One Reads What You Write, Thatâ€™s Because It Sucks</title><link>http://publishing20.disqus.com/blog_herald_column_if_no_one_reads_what_you_write_thatatms_because_it_sucks/#comment-13569741</link><description>I'm not reading that because it sucks. :)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Koetsier</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2007 15:13:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 7 Ways Apple TV Changes The Game And What Podcasters Need To Know And Do About It</title><link>http://paulcolligansblog.disqus.com/7_ways_apple_tv_changes_the_game_and_what_podcasters_need_to_know_and_do_about_it/#comment-14776249</link><description>My living room to yours ... courtesy AppleTV. I agree that this is a game-changer, and I hope Apple sees it as such enough to really market this bigtime.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Koetsier</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2008 12:16:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Quincy Smith President Of New Company-wide CBS Interactive; Larry Kramer Out As Head Of CBS Digital</title><link>http://paidcontent.disqus.com/quincy_smith_president_of_new_company_wide_cbs_interactive_larry_kramer_out_as_head_of_cbs_digital/#comment-18816770</link><description>As Matthew Ingram points brilliantly points out, this bozo&amp;#39;s impressive-sounding sound bite ...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&amp;quot;The important thing is that we get confidence internally on a set interactive strategy that will immediately change and be organic as we grow. From there we can think about how we can execute on this as a team.” &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt; ... actually contains about zero meaningful content.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/11/06/leverage-those-core-competencies-baby/" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/11/06/lev...&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Koetsier</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 07 Nov 2006 05:59:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Is the American Meritocracy Dead?</title><link>http://travelingforever.disqus.com/is_the_american_meritocracy_dead/#comment-19862721</link><description>I believe in merit and hard work and personal effort, but a thousand-to-one ratio of CEO-to-worker pay is disgraceful. I do not think a society with inequities like that can be stable in the long term.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Koetsier</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 02 Jul 2006 23:03:34 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>