http://disqus.com/people/6cf5ff53ad00ade37a0a55c059d1d273/enMon, 02 Jun 2008 16:15:00 -0000http://allfacebook.disqus.com/facebook_leaves_more_questions_than_answers/#comment-1640357Well, Nick, since you asked...<br><br>I've created one application so far, Evarium (<a href="http://www.facebook.com/apps/application.php?id=6277707227" rel="nofollow">http://www.facebook.com/apps/application.php?id...</a>), which launched last week and currently has 1226 users.<br><br>Frankly, as both a user and a developer, I wish Facebook would mostly just leave things alone---they mostly work fine for me. Failing that, I wish they'd change things more incrementally. And failing that, I wish they'd give us a coherent, detailed proposal regarding whatever they're going to change, let us comment on it for a definite period, then give us a coherent, detailed revision, etc. I'm no fan of bureaucracy, but I'm unhappy with the vagueness of this profile revision.Ralph HaygoodWed, 21 May 2008 20:43:19 -0000http://allfacebook.disqus.com/facebook_adding_new_metrics_038_announces_other_changes/#comment-1640426I'm one of those part-time developers with limited time, and yes, all these changes are definitely making it tougher for me. For example, my application Evarium (<a href="http://evarium.com" rel="nofollow">http://evarium.com</a>) is crippled without a profile box, and users are now (or will soon be) obliged to push a button in order to authorize a profile box. So rather than streamlining the add process, which is a proclaimed goal of the recent changes, they're actually adding friction to it as far as Evarium is concerned. I'm not impressed.Ralph HaygoodMon, 02 Jun 2008 16:15:00 -0000