DISQUS

wt bot north Zone. Any idea of cut off. Believe it will go higher thn any other zone.

I'm only 35 and I have been married three times.. Yah..the odds are not good..Not good at all!

That's so sad. I give my prayers and symphathies to the Camerons.

brilliant banksy-esque theme.. great job!!!!

Im down with both dre and snoop but dre has monster cable while snoop has skullcandy so its not close in terms of quality.

Who knew???

This is a joke. I still illin on the Nokio Woody video where he walk out on em the day they announce they come back

Yo wassup Yeti keep it up bro and the site looks really tite now. Props brotha

No one would ever wear those pants with a giant T on them!

First he gets the ESPN blogging deal, the Nike ad and now this? Wayne is an athlete!

"I should approach that girl, mmm I don't really feel like it though. I really should, I need to get this handled. She's not even that hot, now I'm just being picky. What am I going to say though? Jealous girlfriend? nah that's old and shit. I'll just go and say 'hey I'm out meeting people'. Yeah but I don't feel like it. I just have to do it. What do I say after that though? I dunno just wing it."


Then either:

"fuck it lets get this over with"

or

"nah I don't feel like it, I'll do it later"



Thinking about it now I might even have the pro-approach voice as a 3rd person, eg "you just need to do it". I'll post again if I remember next time I approach.

anyone see Exit 105 on sat?

Anyone see Exit 105 sat?

So if Will Smith's son is married to your daughter and he thinks its cool to get ass from random girls while married to your daughter you would be cool with that??


If my daughter is okay with it. Then yes I'm good.



So you are saying that showing your children that sleeping with other people while married is ok!!! Why get married then. What is your purpose. You can sleep around and be single.



Their children are seeing a happy stable relationship. What's the deal.





WOW are we that insecure or hard up for men that we allow such disrespect. Men don't stand for it so why should we.



How is this being "hard up" for a man if Jada is in accord with the decision?



If the two parties involved are on the same page it wans't the "man's" decision it was their decision.

Uh...it's not cheating if both parties in accord. Cheating happens if you're in a monogamous relationship and both parties have agreed to exclusivity.


Apparently that's NOT the contract Will and Jada are under...so why all the uproar?



Marriage is what you make it. It is NOT one size fits all. People have different rules and standards and this is theirs.

As a woman who had a 42in butt with a 28 in. waist...(Now 40/26) All big butts aren't unhealthy.


What you need to concern yourself with is the spare tire. If you have a lot fat in your stomach then you have problems.



See - Big Butts = Good Health

Wanna link swap?

There is no such thing as a great boyfriend who can't get me off. Sorry.


Bad sex is a no go. There's no way around and no substitutions for it.



I can have vaginal orgasms. Clitoral stimulation alone rarely, if ever, does the trick.



So I guess I'm in the minority on that one.

And look, there's a drink holder! You don't have to be just injured - you can also be inebriated. But yes, I agree with Earthworm: a device like that would only put stress on the injured leg. Sure, it could work if you managed to stay on the thing by putting pressure ONLY on the upper part of the leg, leaving the lower part sitting there. But I seriously doubt that would happen. If anything swings/comes at the person's face, their natural reaction will be to lean back. And in that instant, pressure will be applied to that lower leg part.

Could you imagine if it was a broken leg? Ouch.

The only injury I can imagine this device would work for is a sprained ankle.

Folk down south say "Crackers" on the regular.

I think black folks need a DailyKos of their own. Been saying that for awhile now.


I think you all are the best poised to do that.

I'm a contributor to a known techblog. I'm not going to put my name in the hat and risk some relationships I have, so this is all the personal detail I give.


As someone who's been reading that site for like 8 years, I can predict what those guys are going to say about anything. Some of them are like broken records, my point is that Ars is consistent (good or bad, your call). They do not sit on stories for 3 days (not often at least), but do run some stories late after doing more work on them. I trust a story on Ars more than most because they have a strong track record. I do not believe that Ars steals its angles, and it will take a lot more than timestamps to prove that to me.



What I do believe is that this situation shows how easy it is to mistake one's angle for a unique angle when it wasn't. This happens to me once a month. I make a joke, take a certain spin, & someone emails my editor saying I ripped b/c they publilshed first. There really are only so many spins to take, though, and so much news.



There are definitely a few people who feel like Ars has burned them before, & they make efforts to discredit Ars on behind the scenes. I have heard from two of them & listened to one's story (he's one of the anonymous in the commenters yesterday, & he makes the same comments in every thread on the topic). Guy is angry over a lack of hat tips, which he thinks he's due, & the way Ars brushed him off when he raised it to their attention (but he also says he gets links now).



IMHO you guys are barking up the wrong tree. Ars links to sources & throws hat tips in their stories, increasingly so in the last year. They sometimes imagine bringing great insight to a story when its really only pointing out the obvious, but that's another problem (pity on the person who tries to argue with an Ars writer).



There are great offenders of the blogosphere out there, but Ars is not one of them. It gets attention because the site is very big & gets a lot of diggs. It also upsets many bloggers that Ars isn't more blogger friendly, but you are more likely to get a mention there than on news.com or wired or MacWorld.



Ars is a big site now, much bigger than when I started reading. Now Ars has to be more careful, & that's only a good thing, but they're not the jerks you make them out to be.

For those who don't know the deal was if South Carolina's primary was moved up then Clyburn would remain neutral.


Clyburn is the elder of the CBC so I'm sure the big whigs definitely didn't want him to actively campaign for OBAMA, 'cause I'm sure he could have kept other CBC members in line and that of course would have made it difficult for Clinton's surrogates to do their shilling.



But Clyburn is the most un-neutral (is that a word?) neutral superdelegate I've seen. Where he stands is clear. He's just not actively campaigning.

Yeah I saw this happening back in February when after 11 wins they Superdels didn't come out.


And then really saw the writing on the wall when she didn't win Texas and Ohio with the necessary votes...



It's gonna be a long summer folks.

I don't know why all this angst at Hillary. She's doing what she's always said she's gonna do...go straight thru to Denver.


The Superdelegates are the problem. They could've stopped this thing in February, or yesterday but they haven't why...



They Don't Want the Black Guy at the Top of the Ticket