http://disqus.com/people/6b76da357e510aa8f5eb0c132e6c41c9/enSat, 13 Jan 2007 02:35:16 -0000http://mathewingram.disqus.com/craigslist_8212_a_giant_cash_machine/#comment-1297542Matthew, I have my doubts. Craig is very conscious of nurturing a community around the list and doing only what the community wants done. Of course he could earn more but look at why he is charging now in those cities - to improve the community experience. My guess is if he went for the dollars his community, in part, would leave, maybe not enough to wreck the business but to do significant damage to the ehtos. Thre might be an important lesson about the limits of long term profitability in Craig's List.haydnTue, 17 Oct 2006 04:37:16 -0000http://mathewingram.disqus.com/charles_cooper_channels_andrew_keen/#comment-1297941I wodner are we being over hasty dismissing these arguments - take a look today at Google taking 30,000 videos down. Like it or not ther are ownership issues tucked away in some of the cracks in Cooper's argument and if we address them we'll come to a better understanding of where the web will go.haydnSat, 21 Oct 2006 05:15:02 -0000http://mathewingram.disqus.com/charles_cooper_channels_andrew_keen/#comment-1297945Ok - so how do we go about undersanding the issue without taking the easy route that's there at each extreme - all content re-use is great, no content re-use should be allowed.haydnSat, 21 Oct 2006 10:17:47 -0000http://mathewingram.disqus.com/maclean8217s_goes_trolling_for_controversy/#comment-1299393HI Mathew, responded in a post today. I still think we can use this to move the debate on instead of each side standing off and saying you're wrong. Or is it in the nature of blogging that we just stay in the flow.haydnSat, 28 Oct 2006 06:46:15 -0000http://mathewingram.disqus.com/vene_vidi_venice_8212_the_tv_killer/#comment-1309198I disagree that content will make or break Venice, though they have invested their public reputation in high end content. Bringing connectivity around content is where the zeitgeist is temporarily resident. I think of the Venice Project more as a TV IRC/Im application which is a bit like saying it's a non-virtual Second Life.haydnSat, 13 Jan 2007 02:35:16 -0000http://danielrm26.disqus.com/the_real_reason_digg_and_reddit_are_in_trouble/#comment-4351100Spot onhaydnThu, 24 Aug 2006 12:28:17 -0000http://mashable.disqus.com/thread_852/#comment-5902617Are you starting to get cynical?haydnMon, 04 Sep 2006 18:23:13 -0000http://mashable.disqus.com/thread_852/#comment-5902618I mispelled sceptical!haydnMon, 04 Sep 2006 18:23:50 -0000http://scobleizer.disqus.com/avoiding_work_jeff_pulver_has_a_list_of_internet_tv_shows/#comment-9651612I was categorising content over here <a href="http://www.mediangler.com/2006/08/30/categorising-content/" rel="nofollow">http://www.mediangler.com/2006/08/30/categorisi...</a><br><br>- if you look in thw content category you can see a list building up.haydnThu, 31 Aug 2006 06:53:52 -0000http://scobleizer.disqus.com/listening_to_shelley_powers_about_women_in_tech/#comment-9651964Maybe promote some European and Asian voices too.haydnSat, 02 Sep 2006 11:24:10 -0000http://scobleizer.disqus.com/getting_outside_the_frothy_bubble/#comment-9652171Well - I'm not in the valley and I've been saying for some time my website stats reflect far more the influence of start pages than search engines. So me no valley boy but life's a changing - just that netvibes is a techcrunch boost so not exactly outside the bubble.haydnMon, 04 Sep 2006 18:32:07 -0000http://drm.disqus.com/the_real_reason_digg_and_reddit_are_in_trouble/#comment-11149695Spot onhaydnThu, 24 Aug 2006 12:28:17 -0000http://publishing20.disqus.com/more_evidence_that_media_20_may_be_less_profitable_than_media_10/#comment-13569093Web 2.0 is really about corner shop publishing and the ability to monetise small e-publishing operations. YouTube is used extensively by people who have set up video publishing businesses and want to avoid all the server cost - and so give it to YouTube. Just as I might not want to host pictures in an epublishing enterprise - I give that to flickr.<br><br>Web 2.0 gives me plenty of ways to develop a website and to draw in content at next to know cost. larer media players are challenged by the amount an individual or small team can achieve. The sheeet volume of content in a newspaper website is no longer a challenge for me to match or at least appear to match.<br><br>Advertisers will certainly benefit - if iI want to launch a calssified and ad sale business for a dozen websites I can aggregate them and do it and undercut most established media businesses. For example I could do $5 house sale classifieds profitably.<br><br>We've yet to explore the implications of a million publishers who used to be called journalists unleashing that economic power.haydnFri, 13 Oct 2006 05:10:53 -0000