<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for ScreenRant.com</title><link>http://disqus.com/people/6b192d058f08aea0e727331bae6422b5/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 00:28:49 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Iron Man Movie Mark III Armor Image: Real Or CGI?</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/iron_man_movie_mark_iii_armor_image_real_or_cgi/#comment-21651967</link><description>Heath,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Damn... now THAT lays THAT to rest!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 00:13:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Is The Joker Related To The Crow?</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/is_the_joker_related_to_the_crow/#comment-21651964</link><description>Oh, sure... the picture above is really the worst possible. Straight-on, no expression or context.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 00:13:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Smallville: 7 Seasons Only Confirmed</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/smallville_7_seasons_only_confirmed/#comment-21651960</link><description>I stand corrected. :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 00:13:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: First Attempt At  A Podcast&amp;#8230;</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/first_attempt_at_a_podcast8230/#comment-21651955</link><description>Thanks, John. That&amp;#39;s just the kind of advice I&amp;#39;m looking for. I just discovered &lt;a href="http://Odeo.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;Odeo.com&lt;/a&gt;... do you know anything about them? Seems very simple to do a podcast using their web-based program and the also seem to handle the RSS feed side of things.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I&amp;#39;ll definitely check out your suggestion though!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 00:13:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: American Idol: The Haves And The Have Nots</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/american_idol_the_haves_and_the_have_nots/#comment-21651949</link><description>"American Idol is still on the air?"&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Heh, that&amp;#39;s how I feel about "Survivor", which I finally stopped watching. :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;"...but consider the target audience, old man."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Oooooh. Low blow. ;-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 00:12:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Jeff Briges = Obadiah Stane In Iron Man!</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/jeff_briges_obadiah_stane_in_iron_man/#comment-21651946</link><description>I appreciate the kind words. I probably don&amp;#39;t post nearly as often as I should, but I try not to just copy what everyone else is talking about out there. I&amp;#39;m a bit more picky about what I put on my blog. :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Best,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 00:12:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Fantastic Four 2: Galactus In But Not Yet Designed?</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/fantastic_four_2_galactus_in_but_not_yet_designed/#comment-21651942</link><description>Baganoth,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I certainly hope you&amp;#39;re right!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 00:12:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Happy New Year!</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/happy_new_year/#comment-21651932</link><description>Heh, thanks for sneaking in that review and the same to you!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 00:12:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Let The Dark Knight (Batman Begins 2) Buzz Begin</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/let_the_dark_knight_batman_begins_2_buzz_begin/#comment-21651929</link><description>Kel,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I think they are going to change the costume in this movie and make it less "rubbery", but I wouldn&amp;#39;t count on a full-on Alex Ross look.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;BTW, I don&amp;#39;t know if you&amp;#39;ve ever seen this, but it&amp;#39;s a super cool short Batman film that DOES use an Alex Ross costume:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://screenrant.com/archives/batman-dead-end-1.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://screenrant.com/archives/batman-dead-end-1.html&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 00:12:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: &amp;#8220;The Good German&amp;#8221;, The Bad American?</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/8220the_good_german8221_the_bad_american/#comment-21651928</link><description>Brian,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Oh, I&amp;#39;m pretty sure from what I&amp;#39;ve seen that it will be the German people (as in population, not the military) that will be shown as victims, and their country WAS decimated. But it&amp;#39;s not like the Allies just decided to mosey on over and bomb the heck out of their country for no good reason.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 00:12:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 300 Trailer = Testosterone Injection</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/300_trailer_testosterone_injection/#comment-21651927</link><description>Jersey,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;You crack me up. Sure you make some valid points, but I&amp;#39;m not expecting Citizen Kane. I was referring to the emotional impact of the trailer, which was very effective, and I think the movie itself will be very entertaining as well.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 00:11:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Justice League Live-Action TV Series?</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/justice_league_live_action_tv_series/#comment-21651926</link><description>Sorry, don&amp;#39;t know the answer to that one.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 00:11:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Invincible Iron Man Animated Trailer</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/invincible_iron_man_animated_trailer/#comment-21651925</link><description>Thanks very much for the info. I was probably going to pick up the DVD regardless. :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 00:11:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: &amp;#8220;Studio 60&amp;#8243;  Tries To Head Off Christians At The Pass</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/8220studio_608243_tries_to_head_off_christians_at_the_pass/#comment-21651924</link><description>Brent,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;You know, sometimes I think I ought to save some posts as drafts before publishing. I wrote the above at 3AM, and since writing it I&amp;#39;ve decided that I could have polished it quite a bit and added some other thoughts.  :P&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I understand your point, but what I don&amp;#39;t understand is why it used to be possible to be funny without being so damned offensive. It could be my personal perspective filtering my memories, but if you&amp;#39;re old enough to have seen "Saturday Night Live" back in it&amp;#39;s heyday (John Belushi, Chevy Chase, Dan Akroyd, etc.) that show was HYSTERICAL and at the time it was cutting edge and I don&amp;#39;t remember it being so bloody offensive or gross.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;In ANY group there are those who take extreme positions and make the whole group look bad. Radical Muslims for example, but I don&amp;#39;t see anyone taking potshots at the Muslim religion.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Personally I think that parents need to get their heads out of their butts and actually RAISE their children instead of just yelling and screaming at everyone else about how screwed up everything is. However, having said that, I think an apt analogy is that Hollywood is throwing tons of crap on the sidewalk and we&amp;#39;ve got to walk around it or find some way to avoid it. I guess the real question is: Why do people WANT crap on the sidewalk?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 00:11:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: &amp;#8220;24&amp;#8243; 2006 Season Finale</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/8220248243_2006_season_finale/#comment-21651915</link><description>It&amp;#39;ll probably come out on DVD before it re-airs on some cable network.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 00:11:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Oliver Stone&amp;#8217;s WTC: An Actual Tribute?</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/oliver_stone8217s_wtc_an_actual_tribute/#comment-21651914</link><description>Riiiiiight.  8)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 00:11:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A &amp;#8220;Lost&amp;#8221; Star Trek With The Original Crew</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/a_8220lost8221_star_trek_with_the_original_crew/#comment-21651910</link><description>I try to forget the first 3 seasons of "Enterprise" and only consider the 4th season "real" Trek.  8)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 00:11:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Bullets Are Faster Than People</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/bullets_are_faster_than_people/#comment-21651903</link><description>I&amp;#39;m not familiar with "The Untouchables" but the "Raiders" example is great, thanks.  :D&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 00:10:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Chris Rock Not Hosting 2006 Oscars</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/chris_rock_not_hosting_2006_oscars/#comment-21651902</link><description>"Of course, I think the Oscars are the television equivalent of spam."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;HA! :lol:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Letterman... barf.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The thing I like about Billy Crystal and Steve Martin is that they both know how to poke fun at the whole thing WITHOUT coming across as mean spirited. That&amp;#39;s the difference between them and Chris Rock, Whoopi Goldberg and David Letterman.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 00:10:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 1st Blu-ray Hi-Def DVD Movie&amp;#8230; You Won&amp;#8217;t Believe It</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/1st_blu_ray_hi_def_dvd_movie8230_you_won8217t_believe_it/#comment-21651899</link><description>Yup, reminds me of the selection method they used for their Superbit DVDs...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 00:10:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Smallville To Last 7 Seasons</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/smallville_to_last_7_seasons/#comment-21651896</link><description>Hey John, nice to have you drop by.  :D&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 00:10:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Apprentice Season 4: More Class, Less Profanity</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/the_apprentice_season_4_more_class_less_profanity/#comment-21651894</link><description>Oh, right! I think I saw that in the promo for the series.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Nope, not yet. Probably saving it for sweeps month.  8)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 00:10:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Car Commercial or Movie Trailer?</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/car_commercial_or_movie_trailer/#comment-21651892</link><description>Jesse, I disagree. If you watch the trailer for the original film, you&amp;#39;ll see that for the most part the car is shown in much shorter segments, from close-in shots where it&amp;#39;s hard to make out the make and from wide shots that also don&amp;#39;t highlight the specific car.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;In this trailer, the camera lingers all over the car and especially the Audi corporate symbol.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Click here to see the trailer for the original movie.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 00:09:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Is this the end of movie theaters?</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/is_this_the_end_of_movie_theaters/#comment-21651891</link><description>Kieran, I think a more accurate analogy would be to say that iTunes and P2P haven&amp;#39;t eliminated live concerts.  :D&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Good point in regards to the "social outing" aspect, although you could do the same at the home of a friend with a big-screen surround-sound system. Of course that would be the equivalent of half a dozen people getting into a movie for the price of one...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 00:09:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Will DC Boot  Marvel from the Big Screen Throne?</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/will_dc_boot_marvel_from_the_big_screen_throne/#comment-21651887</link><description>I would think that if "Fantastic Four" isn&amp;#39;t successful as a movie there won&amp;#39;t *be* a franchise, much as there isn&amp;#39;t a "Daredevil" franchise.  :confused:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Personally, I think that Marvel really raised the bar with the Spiderman movies and anything else they put out is compared to that (and should be).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I like a fun, no-brainer action flick as much as the next guy (I really do)  :P  , but real fans of all these superhero characters grew up with them and there&amp;#39;s a desire out there to have them done with some sort of respect to the source material.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 00:09:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Batman Begins Hype Burnout</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/batman_begins_hype_burnout/#comment-21651886</link><description>Trent, I&amp;#39;m with you on this one. I have a feeling that I&amp;#39;m not going to be disappointed.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 00:09:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Next James Bond: Finally Chosen?</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/the_next_james_bond_finally_chosen/#comment-21651882</link><description>Nope, I haven&amp;#39;t seen "The Castle", but I know there&amp;#39;s some great talent Down Under.  :D&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 00:09:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Apprentice 3: Finally an interesting match up</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/apprentice_3_finally_an_interesting_match_up/#comment-21651875</link><description>I guess I should have written something up about the season finale of  "The Apprentice"...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I think they made it extremely obvious in the previous week that Kendra was going to take it. Kind of took a lot of the suspense out of the finale. Kendra seemed to have a split personality: Prior to the finale task she seemed very meek and mild and like she wouldn&amp;#39;t stand up for herself. But at the end she seemed to have a wake up call and was very strong.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I think the biggest difference between Tana and Kendra was that Kendra had much more class. I don&amp;#39;t thank that came from her college education... I think it came from her upbringing.  :D&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 00:08:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Iron Man movie update</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/iron_man_movie_update/#comment-21651849</link><description>Highball,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Selleck would have been perfect 15 years ago but he&amp;#39;s really too old now.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Plus, you know they&amp;#39;re going to go with some 28 year old actor for this.  8)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 00:06:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: New Images From &amp;#8216;The Imaginarium of Doctor Parnassus&amp;#8217;</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/new_images_from_8216the_imaginarium_of_doctor_parnassus8217/#comment-21651786</link><description>test comment</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 18:57:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Mad Max Minus Mel Gibson</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/mad_max_minus_mel_gibson/#comment-21651785</link><description>test</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 07 Mar 2009 14:30:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: New Star Trek Trailer Is Freaking Awesome</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/new_star_trek_trailer_is_freaking_awesome/#comment-21651736</link><description>Ok, my Canadian friends - you can now see the trailer! :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2009 11:05:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: New Star Trek Trailer Is Freaking Awesome</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/new_star_trek_trailer_is_freaking_awesome/#comment-21651723</link><description>I'll get it hosted here when I can - I just wanted to get it online ASAP.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2009 01:24:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Watchmen Review</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/watchmen_review/#comment-21651714</link><description>@charles darwin&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Admit it, you're a nudist, aren't you.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2009 22:02:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Watchmen Review</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/watchmen_review/#comment-21651707</link><description>@Daniel&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I did my best. :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2009 17:43:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Watchmen Review</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/watchmen_review/#comment-21651702</link><description>@SK47&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I'd say the movie is very effective at putting you back in the 1980s.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2009 13:50:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Watchmen Review</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/watchmen_review/#comment-21651699</link><description>@SK47&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;To me, when you take a dozen or so comic books that form one story and bind them into one publication for sale - that is now a graphic novel IMHO.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2009 13:34:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Watchmen Review</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/watchmen_review/#comment-21651691</link><description>@Evie&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thanks very much!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2009 10:22:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Watchmen Review</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/watchmen_review/#comment-21651690</link><description>@huggybear&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;That's not the first time I've heard I look like Jackie Earle Haley. :-P&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;@Kahless&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;No idea, I didn't sit through all the credits - but I doubt it.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2009 10:20:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Watchmen Review</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/watchmen_review/#comment-21651677</link><description>@Heath&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Because I'm wondering if I might have been hyper-critical while watching it and might think it's better upon a second viewing. Ideally I think I would have given it a 7.5/10 but there's no way to do that on a 1-5 scale (3 3/4 stars?) so I rounded up.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Funny, I looked back at my review of "300" and I gave that 4 stars as well. :-P&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2009 01:13:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Watchmen Review</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/watchmen_review/#comment-21651674</link><description>@Stephen&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Let's just say it was definitely more than a cameo.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2009 00:16:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Watchmen Review</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/watchmen_review/#comment-21651671</link><description>@greenknight&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I say it'll be a cult movie because it didn't feel "mainstream" to me. But despite this I think there will be a hard core fanbase for it as time goes on.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;@arrell&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I said "graphic novel" because a lot of people get so annoyed when it's called that :-P and because that's essentially what it is - it was published as individual issues but if you ever pick up a copy you can see very clearly that it is one big novel.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 22:13:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Enter Screen Rant&amp;#8217;s Awesome Watchmen Giveaway!</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/enter_screen_rant8217s_awesome_watchmen_giveaway/#comment-21651662</link><description>@Chris&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;You're already good. I keep forgetting to add that to these contest posts...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 15:25:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Enter Screen Rant&amp;#8217;s Awesome Watchmen Giveaway!</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/enter_screen_rant8217s_awesome_watchmen_giveaway/#comment-21651659</link><description>Sorry gang, shipping overseas is VERY expensive and I don't want to be put in the position of having to ask people to pay for postage.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 09:47:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: SR Picks: Wolverine vs. Rorschach</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/sr_picks_wolverine_vs_rorschach/#comment-21651648</link><description>LMAO! That was full of awesomeness!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 20:23:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Is Fox Addressing Fanboy Fears About Key &amp;#8216;Wolverine&amp;#8217; Characters?</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/is_fox_addressing_fanboy_fears_about_key_8216wolverine8217_characters/#comment-21651640</link><description>I disagree.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2009 01:19:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Is Fox Addressing Fanboy Fears About Key &amp;#8216;Wolverine&amp;#8217; Characters?</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/is_fox_addressing_fanboy_fears_about_key_8216wolverine8217_characters/#comment-21651639</link><description>Cant help it :D</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2009 00:04:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Is Fox Addressing Fanboy Fears About Key &amp;#8216;Wolverine&amp;#8217; Characters?</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/is_fox_addressing_fanboy_fears_about_key_8216wolverine8217_characters/#comment-21651638</link><description>Ha!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2009 00:04:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Is Fox Addressing Fanboy Fears About Key &amp;#8216;Wolverine&amp;#8217; Characters?</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/is_fox_addressing_fanboy_fears_about_key_8216wolverine8217_characters/#comment-21651637</link><description>Test comment!! This is awesome!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2009 00:04:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Awesome New Harry Potter &amp;amp; The Half-Blood Prince Trailer</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/awesome_new_harry_potter_amp_the_half_blood_prince_trailer/#comment-21651598</link><description>I'll stick with John Grisham and Tom Clancy (if he ever writes another novel).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 18:21:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Awesome New Harry Potter &amp;amp; The Half-Blood Prince Trailer</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/awesome_new_harry_potter_amp_the_half_blood_prince_trailer/#comment-21651595</link><description>@Oscar&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The only Harry Potter book I've read is the first one.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 16:36:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Awesome New Harry Potter &amp;amp; The Half-Blood Prince Trailer</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/awesome_new_harry_potter_amp_the_half_blood_prince_trailer/#comment-21651591</link><description>@Everett&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Hey, I agree. I was really surprised a while back when I heard this was supposed to be PG as the films do seem to get darker and darker. I even joked at one time that by the time they get to the last one it'll be rated R. :-P&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 15:18:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Watchmen&amp;#8217;s Dr. Manhattan On The Thames</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/watchmen8217s_dr_manhattan_on_the_thames/#comment-21651540</link><description>Here is David's blog:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://blogs.coventrytelegraph.net/thegeekfiles" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://blogs.coventrytelegraph.net/thegeekfiles&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 10:16:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Watchmen Will Be Awesome, But Leave The Kids At Home</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/watchmen_will_be_awesome_but_leave_the_kids_at_home/#comment-21651534</link><description>@Ken J&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Trust me, he's portrayed fully as a villain in the film and there is nothing remotely ambivalent about the rape scene in the film.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;He does despicable things but the government gives him a pass because he's doing their dirty work for them.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2009 00:32:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Watchmen Will Be Awesome, But Leave The Kids At Home</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/watchmen_will_be_awesome_but_leave_the_kids_at_home/#comment-21651524</link><description>@John&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Midnight, Thursday.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 11:09:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Watchmen Will Be Awesome, But Leave The Kids At Home</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/watchmen_will_be_awesome_but_leave_the_kids_at_home/#comment-21651521</link><description>@charles darwin&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;You are one picky son of a gun, aren't you? Typically, when I add an UPDATE to a post, I just indicate what's new at the top and leave the post intact. I just wanted to bring attention to this again with the film about to open.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;As to your comment about "precious kids" you are reminding me why you used to piss me off so royally when you first showed up here on the site.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;So parents should go in "blind" not knowing anything about the content of this film? It's somehow offensive to you that I'm giving them a warning about the content?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I really, REALLY hate when people who obviously DON'T have kids try to tell parents how to parent.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 10:11:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Watchmen Will Be Awesome, But Leave The Kids At Home</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/watchmen_will_be_awesome_but_leave_the_kids_at_home/#comment-21651515</link><description>@S Kurtz&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I *highly* recommend you read this post if you're planning on bringing your 12yo:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://screenrant.com/watchmen-awesome-leave-kids-home-vic-5208/" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://screenrant.com/watchmen-awesome-leave-ki...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;In recent reviews of this film I've seen it described as "extremely brutal."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 16:29:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Watchmen Will Be Awesome, But Leave The Kids At Home</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/watchmen_will_be_awesome_but_leave_the_kids_at_home/#comment-21651513</link><description>@Watchfan1&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;That has to be your call. I don't know your children. If there's any question I would say go watch it by yourself first and then decide based on what you see.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 20:14:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Watchmen Wows At Wonder Con</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/watchmen_wows_at_wonder_con/#comment-21651257</link><description>Doh!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thanks for keeping a sharp eye out, guys. Typo fixed. :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 12:23:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: WonderCon 2009 &amp;#8211; The Sarah Connor Chronicles Panel</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/wondercon_2009_8211_the_sarah_connor_chronicles_panel/#comment-21651249</link><description>@Daniel F&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Yeah, I agree - the show is losing its focus and direction past few episodes.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 10:05:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: J.J. Abrams Talks Cloverfield 2</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/jj_abrams_talks_cloverfield_2/#comment-21651226</link><description>Sequels usually get bigger budgets than the original when the first was done so cheaply. I think they'd better come up with another low budget solution if they want the second one to be profitable.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 01 Mar 2009 21:45:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: WonderCon 2009 &amp;#8211; Star Trek Panel</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/wondercon_2009_8211_star_trek_panel/#comment-21651214</link><description>@Mandarr&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I haven't seen the trailer, but really, how much of a spoiler would they put in a trailer? Perhaps Bruce is referring to not wanting to spoil the TRAILER for readers.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vi</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 13:28:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: WonderCon 2009 &amp;#8211; Star Trek Panel</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/wondercon_2009_8211_star_trek_panel/#comment-21651206</link><description>@Fwise&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Oops! Thanks for catching that - it's been corrected.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 01 Mar 2009 12:29:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Good Green Lantern News: Anton Yelchin Denies Rumors</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/good_green_lantern_news_anton_yelchin_denies_rumors/#comment-21651193</link><description>LOL, greenknight you are on the ball, bro. :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Oh, and so am I!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 01 Mar 2009 00:46:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: WonderCon 2009 &amp;#8211; Day One Recap</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/wondercon_2009_8211_day_one_recap/#comment-21651183</link><description>@Wondercon&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Oh boy... so does this mean that this year's San Diego Comic-Con will be even MORE insanely crowded than last year?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Yikes.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 28 Feb 2009 16:39:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Remakes And Sequels: Have We Reached Overload Yet?</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/remakes_and_sequels_have_we_reached_overload_yet/#comment-21651160</link><description>Sorry Ken, I don't think Serenity was a "redoing" of Firefly. The bit with River and her brother getting on the ship was simply filling in the backstory, not totally changing anything.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 01 Mar 2009 00:36:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 4 New Watchmen Featurettes</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/4_new_watchmen_featurettes/#comment-21651129</link><description>@greenknight&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It had better make a heck of a lot more money than that to even break even.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 01 Mar 2009 10:58:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 4 New Watchmen Featurettes</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/4_new_watchmen_featurettes/#comment-21651125</link><description>I'm really starting to wonder how Watchmen is going to do at the box office. I look through the articles we've written about this film and overall they tend to generate very little discussion.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Not a good sign IMHO.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 28 Feb 2009 14:19:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Bizarre Green Lantern Rumor (That We Hope Is Wrong)</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/bizarre_green_lantern_rumor_that_we_hope_is_wrong/#comment-21651062</link><description>@ComicBook&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I have no idea, the guys over at &lt;a href="http://www.LatinoReview.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.LatinoReview.com&lt;/a&gt; would probably know.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 14:23:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Bizarre Green Lantern Rumor (That We Hope Is Wrong)</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/bizarre_green_lantern_rumor_that_we_hope_is_wrong/#comment-21651059</link><description>My understanding is that he auditioned for the role.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 10:35:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Who Will Helm The Wolfman? Surely Not Brett Ratner!</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/who_will_helm_the_wolfman_surely_not_brett_ratner/#comment-21652168</link><description>So I guess this means that Chris Tucker will be in the movie?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 00:22:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Nightmare On Elm Street To Be Rebooted</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/nightmare_on_elm_street_to_be_rebooted/#comment-21652166</link><description>I don&amp;#39;t follow that sort of film that closely, but yeah, I think I did hear that a while back. That might have been a bit TOO creepy, though.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 00:22:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: General Hawk, Zartan And Destro Cast In G.I. Joe</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/general_hawk_zartan_and_destro_cast_in_gi_joe/#comment-21652165</link><description>Vic here. What I do when I credit a source is I give a shout to the site I found it on and the original source, if listed on that site. So in this case I would say IESB via SHH.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;In Heath&amp;#39;s defense, the first link on SHH didn&amp;#39;t provide a link to the original story on IESB.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 00:22:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The 2008 Oscar Nominations List!</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/the_2008_oscar_nominations_list/#comment-21652159</link><description>I&amp;#39;m glad Heath posted this because I just don&amp;#39;t follow a lot of the movies that end up on the Oscar list. BTW, "Juno" is a movie website favorite, people who run sites have been raving about it for months. I still haven&amp;#39;t seen it myself.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 00:22:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Cloverfield 2 Is A Bad Idea</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/cloverfield_2_is_a_bad_idea/#comment-21652157</link><description>MBL,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Exactly! This movie left people dying for answers and more of the monster. I think that&amp;#39;s what the next film should deliver.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 00:21:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A Cloverfield Movie Party And You&amp;#8217;re Invited</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/a_cloverfield_movie_party_and_you8217re_invited/#comment-21652146</link><description>Yes, in the trailer he&amp;#39;s the guy who&amp;#39;s being honored at the going away party.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 00:21:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Very Early TV Season Finales</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/very_early_tv_season_finales/#comment-21652145</link><description>The nice thing that&amp;#39;s happening lately is that producers are responding quickly to viewer complaints of popular shows. Look at how "Lost" started moving the story forward when they started bleeding viewers due to the stagnant story line. Towards the end of this season of "Heroes" they changed things in response to viewers as well.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Unfortunately the producers of "Star Trek: Enterprise" listened too late and blamed the viewers for lousy ratings instead of stepping up and accepting responsibility. When Manny Coto came on board and starting turning things around in Season 4 it was too late.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 00:21:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 10,000 BC: First Full Trailer</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/10000_bc_first_full_trailer/#comment-21652125</link><description>One thing totally rocks on G4:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;NINJA WARRIOR!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;:-D&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 00:20:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: New Iron Man Movie Myspace Page</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/new_iron_man_movie_myspace_page/#comment-21652123</link><description>LOL, maybe that&amp;#39;ll get more people off that browser and onto Firefox, which is awesome. :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 00:20:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: New Jumper Poster</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/new_jumper_poster/#comment-21652120</link><description>Well, yeah... I suppose you&amp;#39;re right. I can&amp;#39;t lay ALL of the acting blame in Ep. 1-III on Lucas. But I had read that Hayden actually had done some very good work PRIOR to the film series.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I agree with the points you make about anger in the role. He came across like a petulant child instead of a dangerous man.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 00:20:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Cool New French Iron Man Poster</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/cool_new_french_iron_man_poster/#comment-21652119</link><description>Adrian, wow... no I hadn&amp;#39;t. That would be a great way for an unexpressive maske to show some emotion!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 00:20:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: X-Files 2 Casting  News</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/x_files_2_casting_news/#comment-21652115</link><description>I&amp;#39;m glad you guys are covering this because I probably won&amp;#39;t even go see it when it comes out...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 00:19:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Chronicles of Narnia: Prince Caspian Trailer &amp;amp; Poster</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/chronicles_of_narnia_prince_caspian_trailer_amp_poster/#comment-21652114</link><description>Yeah... I think the flip side of that symbolism is going to keep a lot of people away from "The Golden Compass."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 00:19:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Flip Side Of The Writers&amp;#8217; Strike</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/the_flip_side_of_the_writers8217_strike/#comment-21652090</link><description>Ok, I&amp;#39;ve made a couple of changes to the list above, but it still doesn&amp;#39;t change the intent of the article. BTW, just like I was surprised to discover that TV game shows have writers, so do reality shows: who do you suppose comes up with the challenges and such?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 00:18:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Iron Man Videogame Armor Based On ILM Movie Designs</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/iron_man_videogame_armor_based_on_ilm_movie_designs/#comment-21652086</link><description>Joyce,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Yes, thanks for pointing that out!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I don&amp;#39;t really know exactly how much an Xbox costs...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 00:18:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: New Beowulf Footage&amp;#8230; Uh Oh</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/new_beowulf_footage8230_uh_oh/#comment-21652083</link><description>LMAO!!! :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Good one, Jim.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 00:18:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Escape From New York Remake News Keeps Getting Worse</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/escape_from_new_york_remake_news_keeps_getting_worse/#comment-21652080</link><description>I think that won&amp;#39;t happen until Lucas is long dead and buried. By then we&amp;#39;ll all have Matrix-style sockets in our skulls for direct video-to-brain access. :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 00:18:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Creepy Viral Footage, But For What Horror Movie?</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/creepy_viral_footage_but_for_what_horror_movie/#comment-21652070</link><description>LOL... Mike, I know that dude, it was a joke. It&amp;#39;s October and everyone is doing horror-related posts and I thought I&amp;#39;d through my hat in the ring. :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 00:17:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Terminator 4 Moving Ahead With Convoluted Title</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/terminator_4_moving_ahead_with_convoluted_title/#comment-21652068</link><description>You must have missed that in my "Grab Bag" post. :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 00:17:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Star Trek: Eric Bana As Villain And Do We Have Kirk?</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/star_trek_eric_bana_as_villain_and_do_we_have_kirk/#comment-21652066</link><description>They&amp;#39;re being broadcast right now. You can find more info on the episodes here:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.startrek.com/startrek/view/news/TOS/article/28095.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.startrek.com/startrek/view/news/TOS/article/28095.html&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 00:17:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Ugh. You Want See 10,000 BC Poster?</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/ugh_you_want_see_10000_bc_poster/#comment-21652062</link><description>I&amp;#39;m not looking forward to it either. It&amp;#39;s unfortunate but Roland/Emmerich started out on top with Stargate and ID4 and they&amp;#39;ve just gone downhill from there.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 00:17:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: No Surprise: ABC&amp;#8217;s Cavemen Not Shown To Critics</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/no_surprise_abc8217s_cavemen_not_shown_to_critics/#comment-21652061</link><description>Yeah, I&amp;#39;m the guy he said would take the bullet...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Actually I absolutely love all the Geico commercials. I&amp;#39;m even a customer. :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 00:17:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Friday The 13th Part 2 Remake Moving Forward</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/friday_the_13th_part_2_remake_moving_forward/#comment-21652060</link><description>I guess he needs to keep busy between mega-blockbusters, LOL.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 00:17:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: (More) Galactus Will Return In Silver Surfer Movie</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/more_galactus_will_return_in_silver_surfer_movie/#comment-21652058</link><description>However bad the second one was (which I didn&amp;#39;t think it was that awful), it was far better than the first one.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 00:17:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Star Trek Scotty Casting Rumor Off The Mark?</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/star_trek_scotty_casting_rumor_off_the_mark/#comment-21652057</link><description>Jen, yeah, you&amp;#39;re right. It&amp;#39;s just that in the show I never perceived Scotty to be older. McCoy was always the one that stood out as the older cast member.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 00:17:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Star Wars TV: Could Lucas Have Good Taste After All?</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/star_wars_tv_could_lucas_have_good_taste_after_all/#comment-21652054</link><description>Kane, did you know that Lucas already has something like 40 episodes of the animated series that takes place between episodes 3 &amp; 4 completed? He&amp;#39;s having trouble getting distribution for the series because it&amp;#39;s so NOT for kids... it will need to be shown in the post 9PM timeslot here in the U.S.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 00:17:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Tron 2: A Tough Road Ahead</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/tron_2_a_tough_road_ahead/#comment-21652050</link><description>Zar,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I don&amp;#39;t know about the retro-sequel idea... audiences would probably roll there eyes at older-style graphics in a movie like this.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 00:17:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Are We Getting A Teen Thor?</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/are_we_getting_a_teen_thor/#comment-21652048</link><description>Yeah, the "young" thing really bugs me. That&amp;#39;s why I&amp;#39;m so stoked (and surprised!) that Robert Downey Jr. cast was Tony Stark in Iron Man.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Just remember this isn&amp;#39;t cast in stone and it could change. Who knows? Maybe it&amp;#39;s a red herring to throw movie sites off track. :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 00:16:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Now This Could Be Cool: Live-Action Robotech!</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/now_this_could_be_cool_live_action_robotech/#comment-21652046</link><description>I wouldn&amp;#39;t mind seeing a non-Transformers attempt at a transforming robot movie.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Maybe one where anyone over thirty is not automatically portrayed as an idiot.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 00:16:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Op-Ed: Cast Colin Ferguson as Captain America!</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/op_ed_cast_colin_ferguson_as_captain_america/#comment-21652042</link><description>Spray?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Can you explain? I&amp;#39;m not familiar with "Eureka" if that&amp;#39;s the reference...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 00:16:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Review: Hot Fuzz</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/review_hot_fuzz/#comment-21652037</link><description>Sledgehammer..?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 00:16:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Studio Wants Throat Slitting Sweeney Todd Rated PG-13?</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/studio_wants_throat_slitting_sweeney_todd_rated_pg_13/#comment-21652036</link><description>Kane,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Yup. And Zar, I know what you&amp;#39;re saying, but I&amp;#39;m getting sick to death of having to wait for a DVD to get the "real" version of a movie whether it&amp;#39;s uncut, unrated, the director&amp;#39;s cut or whatever.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 00:16:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Keanu Barada Nicto, Dude</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/keanu_barada_nicto_dude/#comment-21652035</link><description>Yeah, if I had my choice I&amp;#39;d say just leave it alone.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 00:16:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Beowulf Comic-Con Unrated Trailer</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/beowulf_comic_con_unrated_trailer/#comment-21652032</link><description>I can&amp;#39;t imagine them going for an R-rating on this.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Regarding the hype, come on... you know how it is on the web: Fanboys going nutso over any little peek at anything. :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 00:16:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: New Trailer For Horror Flick: The Signal</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/new_trailer_for_horror_flick_the_signal/#comment-21652031</link><description>I haven&amp;#39;t read any Stephen King in a loooong time and haven&amp;#39;t read "Cell."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I can tell you that "The Signal" definitely does not have high production values, but I thought it was pretty effective. The only thing odd about it is that it was done in three parts by three different directors so it feels a bit uneven since they each brought a different vibe to their part of the film.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 00:16:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Snooty Title for AVP 2</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/snooty_title_for_avp_2/#comment-21652027</link><description>Ah, that&amp;#39;s right... then the "requiem" in the title may be referring to the Alien embryo placed into that Predator.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 00:16:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Voltron Movie: Let The Copycatting Commence</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/voltron_movie_let_the_copycatting_commence/#comment-21652018</link><description>"Hollywood bugs me. It really, really bugs me."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;That&amp;#39;s EXACTLY why I started this site over 4 years ago!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Voltron, meh... if they come out with a Gigantor movie, then I&amp;#39;ll get excited. :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 00:16:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Review: The Bourne Ultimatum</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/review_the_bourne_ultimatum/#comment-21652015</link><description>When this comes out as an uber-3-DVD set it will DEFINITELY be worth picking up. :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 00:15:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: New Dragon Wars (D-War) Poster</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/new_dragon_wars_d_war_poster/#comment-21652010</link><description>Wow, thanks for the feedback guys. I guess you&amp;#39;re closest to the source so you would know more than I would via just a poster and a trailer.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Maybe it will fall under the category of "so bad that it&amp;#39;s fun?"&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 00:15:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Weekly Rant &amp;#8211; July 22, 2007</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/the_weekly_rant_8211_july_22_2007/#comment-21652009</link><description>Smitty,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;No way dude, I always appreciate feedback!!!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thanks for pointing it out and I hope this one was a bit better. :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 00:15:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Rumors Swirl Around Fox Studios&amp;#8217; Last Minute Comic-Con Ditch</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/rumors_swirl_around_fox_studios8217_last_minute_comic_con_ditch/#comment-21652007</link><description>Zach,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I understand what you&amp;#39;re saying, but your first point (coverage on G4) doesn&amp;#39;t make sense. If something isn&amp;#39;t covered at the Comic-Con, it won&amp;#39;t appear on G4&amp;#39;s coverage OF the Con. :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 00:15:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Cloverfield Release Date Cast In Stone?</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/cloverfield_release_date_cast_in_stone/#comment-21651998</link><description>Heh, I knew the trailer wouldn&amp;#39;t last long. :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 00:15:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: New Iron Man Poster!</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/new_iron_man_poster/#comment-21651996</link><description>Thanks, bud. I&amp;#39;m planning on attending the San Diego Comic-con and I&amp;#39;m betting that&amp;#39;s where the trailer will debut. :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 00:15:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Sam Jackson As Nick Fury In Iron Man?</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/sam_jackson_as_nick_fury_in_iron_man/#comment-21651991</link><description>Adrian,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I try NOT to read the comments at AICN... I feel like I need a shower after reading through some of those nasty, mean-spirited threads. Those guys hate everything, I&amp;#39;m surprised if the comments are positive regarding Iron Man.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 00:14:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Screen Rant Weekly Podcast &amp;#8211; June 14, 2007</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/screen_rant_weekly_podcast_8211_june_14_2007/#comment-21651989</link><description>Thanks again for the suggestion!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 00:14:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Supergirl In Season 7 Of Smallville</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/supergirl_in_season_7_of_smallville/#comment-21651987</link><description>I don&amp;#39;t remember that specific rule, but I can forgive the producers for breaking rules they set for the show 6 years ago, before they knew what direction it would go and how popular it would be. :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;At the very least, the "no flights" rule seems kind of silly at this point:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Super-strengh - Check&lt;br&gt;Super-speed - Check&lt;br&gt;Heat beams coming out of his eyeballs - Check&lt;br&gt;Flying - No way, that&amp;#39;s too over the top!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;:-D&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 00:14:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Happy Hogan WILL Appear In Iron Man</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/happy_hogan_will_appear_in_iron_man/#comment-21651984</link><description>Oh man, that&amp;#39;s right... didn&amp;#39;t Spymaster kill him? I don&amp;#39;t know what the heck the point of THAT was...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 00:14:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Mach 5 Race Car from Speed Racer</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/the_mach_5_race_car_from_speed_racer/#comment-21651982</link><description>&lt;a href="http://screenrant.com/speed-racer-history-of-the-real-mach-5-1547/" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://screenrant.com/speed-racer-history-of-th...&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 00:14:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: No Hostel 3, 4 or 5 to follow Hostel 2</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/no_hostel_3_4_or_5_to_follow_hostel_2/#comment-21651981</link><description>Ah. Well I hadn&amp;#39;t read/heard any of that. Of course I haven&amp;#39;t followed Roth very closely. If it&amp;#39;s true that he&amp;#39;s made those statements then it&amp;#39;s just plain dumb. What was the excuse for the Romans setting lions upon Christians 2,000 years ago? For that matter what about cage fighting, WWF wrestling, etc.? Those have been around far longer than anything related to the current administration.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 00:14:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Dark Knight In IMAX</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/the_dark_knight_in_imax/#comment-21651980</link><description>All I&amp;#39;ve heard about "Captain Marvel" is that Dwayne "The Rock" Johnson is interested in the role. Doesn&amp;#39;t sound like it&amp;#39;s exactly blasting ahead into production. I also thought that "The Flash" had run into a snag at the very basic screenplay level, so I doubt we&amp;#39;ll see that next year. Don&amp;#39;t know anything about "The Spirit."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 00:14:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Lost Season 3 Finale</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/lost_season_3_finale/#comment-21651979</link><description>Ohhh, good one! Knowing this show that is entirely possible, although it would be a cop-out IMHO. Of course a the brother/sister pair seem to have stayed dead...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 00:14:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Recap &amp;#8211; Heroes Season One: Landslide</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/recap_8211_heroes_season_one_landslide/#comment-21651973</link><description>Oh man... you&amp;#39;re RIGHT! Well, heck... that validates that he should have kept away from Ted. :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 00:14:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Bizarre Green Lantern Rumor (That We Hope Is Wrong)</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/bizarre_green_lantern_rumor_that_we_hope_is_wrong/#comment-21651051</link><description>@Lee-Unit&lt;br&gt;And don't forget as Kyle Reese in Terminator Salvation!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;@Rorschach&lt;br&gt;It's Hal Jordan, last I heard.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Don't worry guys, remember this is just a RUMOR.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 23:34:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How Many Best Picture Winners Have YOU Seen?</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/how_many_best_picture_winners_have_you_seen/#comment-21651009</link><description>No Country for Old Men was very good until the last 10 minutes or so, where it COMPLETELY fell apart.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 10:36:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How Many Best Picture Winners Have YOU Seen?</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/how_many_best_picture_winners_have_you_seen/#comment-21650988</link><description>Correction, I've seen 48. I've seen every single one from 1970 through 2007 except for Ghandi in 1982. And I've seen a lot of the classics from further back that are on the list.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 20:30:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How Many Best Picture Winners Have YOU Seen?</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/how_many_best_picture_winners_have_you_seen/#comment-21650986</link><description>47 out of 81&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 20:11:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Zack Snyder On Adapting The Dark Knight Returns</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/zack_snyder_on_adapting_the_dark_knight_returns/#comment-21650977</link><description>@SK47&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I think for some stories the term graphic novel is appropriate, even if they were originally published in individual comic book form. Watchmen is a very good example of this.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Heck, Time Magazine called it one of the 100 best novels ever written.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 10:35:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Finally, An Update On &amp;#8216;Splice&amp;#8217; (Plus New Images!)</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/finally_an_update_on_8216splice8217_plus_new_images/#comment-21650959</link><description>@charles darwin&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Are you familiar with H.R. Giger's art? I think that's the point here - to make a hybrid that is somehow both alluring yet repulsive at the same time.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Really messes with your head and I think that's the genius of this.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 18:32:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Counterpoint: How To Make DC Comics Movies That WORK</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/counterpoint_how_to_make_dc_comics_movies_that_work/#comment-21650900</link><description>Sorry, to clarify: the dumb stuff is in the theatrical version, I wasn't referring to Donner's re-cut version of the film which is BETTER.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 01 Mar 2009 12:33:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Counterpoint: How To Make DC Comics Movies That WORK</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/counterpoint_how_to_make_dc_comics_movies_that_work/#comment-21650899</link><description>@greenknight&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Have you seen the Richard Donner version of Superman 2? It's MUCH better than the original theatrical version.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;They put so much bizarre crap in that one that it was ridiculous... cellophane "S," tractor beams from fingertips (there's a super-power I wasn't aware of), and my favorite: Superman's "forgetfulness kiss."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Duh.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 01 Mar 2009 12:32:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Which One Of These Release Dates Will Change?</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/which_one_of_these_release_dates_will_change/#comment-21650793</link><description>@Gary&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Don't recall where I found that particular pic.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 17:44:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Stargate Universe Casting Update</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/stargate_universe_casting_update/#comment-21650764</link><description>@Bill&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;That's my concern about this new show as well.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 14:07:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Michel Gondry To Direct The Green Hornet?</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/michel_gondry_to_direct_the_green_hornet/#comment-21650750</link><description>@Aaron&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thanks for catching those typos, I missed them while editing the article. Sometimes I miss wrong spellings of people's names.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 20:46:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Smallville And Supernatural Renewed</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/smallville_and_supernatural_renewed/#comment-21650737</link><description>@Jerm&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;So you think Smallville is great, Jericho sucks AND you want Lana back?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Dude you are on the WRONG website. :-P&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 10:28:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Discussion &amp;#8211; February 25, 2009</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/open_discussion_8211_february_25_2009/#comment-21650704</link><description>@Patrick&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;No problem at all. I would think anyone who doesn't run a website would even know that's not a question you generally ask. :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I'll tell you this: The number has 5 figures. :-P&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 15:47:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Discussion &amp;#8211; February 25, 2009</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/open_discussion_8211_february_25_2009/#comment-21650699</link><description>@Bill&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;LOL, no way I could pass for 29 anymore. :-P&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 14:08:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Discussion &amp;#8211; February 25, 2009</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/open_discussion_8211_february_25_2009/#comment-21650696</link><description>@Patrick&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;That question is the web version of asking a woman how old she is. :-P&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;@Ken&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I think comic book movies are getting better and better. Iron Man and TDK (especially TDK) raised the bar on how seriously you can take a comic book movie.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I'm just glad that finally it seems like they have screenwriters who understand that the "comic" in "comic book" doesn't mean "funny."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 11:38:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Star Trek: A Fresh Look At The New USS Enterprise</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/star_trek_a_fresh_look_at_the_new_uss_enterprise/#comment-21650652</link><description>No, I have that version but the one I'm referring to is for the original series. It features ships, uniforms, gear and a cross section of a starbase. It also has the founding documents of the Federation.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;VERY geeky and VERY cool. :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 21:34:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Star Trek: A Fresh Look At The New USS Enterprise</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/star_trek_a_fresh_look_at_the_new_uss_enterprise/#comment-21650644</link><description>Regarding the Kelvin... guys, if you pick up a copy of the original Star Trek Technical manual from many years ago you will find in their a starship with the same nacelle configuration as the Kelvin. :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 23:01:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Star Trek: A Fresh Look At The New USS Enterprise</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/star_trek_a_fresh_look_at_the_new_uss_enterprise/#comment-21650636</link><description>@Ash Ali&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;At the bottom of the post I mention (and include a link) that you can head over to &lt;a href="http://TrekMovie.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;TrekMovie.com&lt;/a&gt; for larger versions and a couple more I don't show above.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 19:37:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Emily Blunt Officially Out Of Iron Man 2</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/emily_blunt_officially_out_of_iron_man_2/#comment-21650576</link><description>@SK47&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;That's why I put in that pic. :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2009 17:41:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 81st Oscars Play-By-Play</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/81st_oscars_play_by_play/#comment-21650552</link><description>@greenknight &amp;amp; Tricia&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;LOL, yeah... I'm done talking about that aspect of it - I won't even reply to ppnkof. :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 13:38:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 81st Oscars Play-By-Play</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/81st_oscars_play_by_play/#comment-21650547</link><description>@Tricia&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I'm very sorry to hear about your nephew. Someone with a gun collection should have known better and taken more precautions.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;FYI, Florida adopted a right-to-carry law in 1987. Anti-gun groups, politicians and the news media predicted the new law would lead to vigilante justice and “Wild West” shootouts on every corner.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Between 1987 and 1996, these changes occurred:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;homicide rate&lt;br&gt;Florida: -36%&lt;br&gt;United States: -0.4%&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;firearm homicide rate&lt;br&gt;Florida: -37%&lt;br&gt;United States: +15%&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;handgun homicide rate&lt;br&gt;Florida: -41%&lt;br&gt;United States: +24%&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;In Japan, where guns are outlawed (and even the criminals don't have them) murder and assault using knives as weapons is increasing. If someone is intent on hurting someone they WILL find a way, whether it be with a gun, a knife or a rock.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 11:40:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 81st Oscars Play-By-Play</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/81st_oscars_play_by_play/#comment-21650540</link><description>Ken &amp;amp; greenknight&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Let's not ramp this up, ok? We all know it goes nowhere.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thanks,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 10:25:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 81st Oscars Play-By-Play</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/81st_oscars_play_by_play/#comment-21650527</link><description>@greenknight&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Ah, thanks for the reminder that we share SOME common ground. ;-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2009 22:11:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 81st Oscars Play-By-Play</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/81st_oscars_play_by_play/#comment-21650522</link><description>English Patient is &amp;lt;strike&amp;gt;a heartwarming&amp;lt;/strike&amp;gt; an adulterous tale of love and loss.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Unless I'm recalling incorrectly.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2009 17:42:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 81st Oscars Play-By-Play</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/81st_oscars_play_by_play/#comment-21650518</link><description>@Tricia&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;So, were the OTHER actors who received applause "God?"&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Just wondering.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;@greenknight&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;See Tricia's comment for your answer.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2009 16:38:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 81st Oscars Play-By-Play</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/81st_oscars_play_by_play/#comment-21650501</link><description>I really wanted to see Mickey Rourke win because I was cringing in anticipation of Sean Penn's speech - and it was what I expected. When he mentioned "shame" my thought was man does he have it backwards.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Another thing that stood out to me was when they showed the industry people who died last year - NO applause for Charlton Heston.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Cold.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2009 10:50:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Weekend Movie News Wrap Up: February 22, 2009</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/weekend_movie_news_wrap_up_february_22_2009/#comment-21650456</link><description>Andy, I've gotta say - with my home theater set up, when I pop in a Blu-ray movie it's BETTER than the theater experience. Sure, I still go see "event" films and blockbusters, but the picture on my big screen has more detail than that on a movie theater screen.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Plus I'm in control of the volume and I don't have to tell anyone to shup the hell up or turn off their cell phone.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2009 20:00:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Weekend Movie News Wrap Up: February 22, 2009</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/weekend_movie_news_wrap_up_february_22_2009/#comment-21650453</link><description>LOL, yeah 80% is a BRUTAL drop for second weekend.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;We'll be putting out an Oscar post later tonight.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 22 Feb 2009 22:37:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: MTV Spoilers Footage: Transformers 2, Watchmen &amp;amp; More</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/mtv_spoilers_footage_transformers_2_watchmen_amp_more/#comment-21650441</link><description>@James&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Sorry, bud. Can't help you with the Canadian issue. I think it's really dumb that some videos are blocked for you guys.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 22 Feb 2009 12:49:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: MTV Spoilers Footage: Transformers 2, Watchmen &amp;amp; More</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/mtv_spoilers_footage_transformers_2_watchmen_amp_more/#comment-21650434</link><description>I recently re-watched Transformers and it validated how much I disliked it. I really thought that I hadn't seen it in so long - maybe I've been too hard on it based on one viewing.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Nope, I still thought it was awful with the intercutting between stupid humor and serious action.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Like I said, hopefully Bay dumps most of the ill-attempted humor in this one - but most people seemed to like it so it'll probably be there in this one as well.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Ugh.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 22 Feb 2009 00:29:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Will Superman Be Unleashed In The Sequel?</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/will_superman_be_unleashed_in_the_sequel/#comment-21650387</link><description>Gotta say I agree with Andy. Kidder as Lois Lane always seemed to fall into the "what were they thinking?" category of casting.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2009 20:31:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Just How Fast CAN They Make A Twilight Movie?</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/just_how_fast_can_they_make_a_twilight_movie/#comment-21650329</link><description>I've read quite a few comments online from Twilight book fans who were not terribly happy with the film.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 21 Feb 2009 11:58:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: &amp;#8216;New Moon&amp;#8217; Art And Title Change</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/8216new_moon8217_art_and_title_change/#comment-21650303</link><description>It really does sound like they're trying to make it sound more "serious" by calling it a saga. Personally I think it comes across as kind of uppity.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Just call it "New Moon."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 14:33:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Nottingham Is Now Robin Hood (And Less Interesting)</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/nottingham_is_now_robin_hood_and_less_interesting/#comment-21650294</link><description>@Ken J&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Well let's keep in mind that the wealthy of today (who built their own fortunes) are not exactly equivalent to the inherited wealthy of hundreds of years ago. I'm sure they DID take awful advantage of those who lived under their rule.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 22 Feb 2009 12:51:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Fanboy Rant: Has Fox Ruined Deadpool? Is Gambit Next?</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/fanboy_rant_has_fox_ruined_deadpool_is_gambit_next/#comment-21650264</link><description>@KEL&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Yes we can, bro. :-P&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 19:36:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Fanboy Rant: Has Fox Ruined Deadpool? Is Gambit Next?</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/fanboy_rant_has_fox_ruined_deadpool_is_gambit_next/#comment-21650255</link><description>LOL, yeah that was me. I don't think "Fanboy" is a derogatory term - it's a descriptive one.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;We know who we are. :-P&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2009 19:00:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Fanboy Rant: Has Fox Ruined Deadpool? Is Gambit Next?</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/fanboy_rant_has_fox_ruined_deadpool_is_gambit_next/#comment-21650240</link><description>Personally, I'm not bent out of shape about costumes, Batman or otherwise - but that could be because I'm not a huge fan of these characters. Batman's changes made sense to me for the world of the movie, as did his vehicle. Yellow spandex in the X-Men movies would have made the comedy a joke.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;In comic books things don't have to be functional - in a real world setting, they do.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;In a side note, with the "reality" they're injecting into comic books these days, if you step back and take a hard look, now things can look sily even in the comic books themselves.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;When the Avengers get together for a meeting, why would they all be sitting around a table wearing masks if they all know who everyone is?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 22 Feb 2009 12:54:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Fanboy Rant: Has Fox Ruined Deadpool? Is Gambit Next?</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/fanboy_rant_has_fox_ruined_deadpool_is_gambit_next/#comment-21650229</link><description>Gotta admit a super-giant dude far larger than a planet would like extremely silly in a live action movie.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 21 Feb 2009 13:37:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Fanboy Rant: Has Fox Ruined Deadpool? Is Gambit Next?</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/fanboy_rant_has_fox_ruined_deadpool_is_gambit_next/#comment-21650217</link><description>@Robert&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Hoo boy...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 21:53:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Fanboy Rant: Has Fox Ruined Deadpool? Is Gambit Next?</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/fanboy_rant_has_fox_ruined_deadpool_is_gambit_next/#comment-21650211</link><description>@Daniel F&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;There's nothing "pathetic" about it. Rob didn't speak to any other points in the film, he didn't say if the film is good but they don't use the costume it'll suck. He's just asking why include characters from the comics - inserting them into the film DUE to their popularity in order to draw audiences and then NOT be faithful to that same character.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If I see any more comments throwing around terms like "pathetic," "stupid" or any other such insulting terms, I'll just delete them.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 17:33:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Fanboy Rant: Has Fox Ruined Deadpool? Is Gambit Next?</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/fanboy_rant_has_fox_ruined_deadpool_is_gambit_next/#comment-21650209</link><description>@huntthejest&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I didn't "shut up Oscar" on that one, I just pointed out that it didn't have to be one or the other... there is a third choice.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Let's not use inflammatory language here.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 16:29:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Fanboy Rant: Has Fox Ruined Deadpool? Is Gambit Next?</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/fanboy_rant_has_fox_ruined_deadpool_is_gambit_next/#comment-21650188</link><description>@D-E-D-P-O-O-L&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;That's actually a pretty good possible explanation.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 21:27:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Fanboy Rant: Has Fox Ruined Deadpool? Is Gambit Next?</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/fanboy_rant_has_fox_ruined_deadpool_is_gambit_next/#comment-21650186</link><description>To me, staying true to the spirit of the character is more important than the costume. Of course I can say that, having been very happy with the Iron Man armor in the movie. :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The thing that bothers me is the claw bit - Deadpool doesn't have claws, does he? Isn't he just an assassin with healing powers and a quick wit?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 20:28:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Fanboy Rant: Has Fox Ruined Deadpool? Is Gambit Next?</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/fanboy_rant_has_fox_ruined_deadpool_is_gambit_next/#comment-21650177</link><description>@Oscar&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;em&gt;"But being mad about a character not having a certain accent is just STUPID"&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;So you're saying the author of this article is stupid? How about dialing that back a tad, eh?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;So if in the Iron Man movie they decide that Natasha Romanova (The Black Widow) shouldn't have a Russian accent, that would be cool, right?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The choices DON'T have to be:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;A. Crappy actor with the right accent.&lt;br&gt;B. Great actor without the right accent.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;How about:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;C. Great actor with the right accent.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 18:02:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Toys Spoil Yet Another G.I. Joe Movie Secret</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/toys_spoil_yet_another_gi_joe_movie_secret/#comment-21650153</link><description>Oh my gosh... that's SO funny! Really, I can't stop laughing.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;:-P&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 14:27:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Toys Spoil Yet Another G.I. Joe Movie Secret</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/toys_spoil_yet_another_gi_joe_movie_secret/#comment-21650151</link><description>@John&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;LOL, most definitely! Then again I loved the bigger G.I. Joes they had when I was a kid and those HUGE accessories, like the Apollo space capsule. :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 14:08:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Thor Movie Update: Kevin McKidd Not Thor</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/thor_movie_update_kevin_mckidd_not_thor/#comment-21650073</link><description>Uh guys... Brad Pitt is older than both McKidd AND Daniel Craig: He's 45.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 23:37:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: What The Heck Is Going On With Iron Man 2?</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/what_the_heck_is_going_on_with_iron_man_2/#comment-21650068</link><description>@Frank&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;In the Ultimates version of the Marvel universe Nick Fury is black and was modeled after Sam Jackson.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 14:32:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Discussion &amp;#8211; February 18, 2009</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/open_discussion_8211_february_18_2009/#comment-21649993</link><description>Yeah, bit of a slow news week, J BIZ.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I'm liking Heroes this season, at least they've gotten rid of the schizophrenic feel of the previous one when it comes to "is he bad or is he good."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The Micah = Rebel idea is interesting, I don't know how many years have passed by on the show since we've seen him but I would think he should at least be a teenager for this to make sense.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 10:15:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Arnold Schwarzenegger Is In The Expendables!</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/arnold_schwarzenegger_is_in_the_expendables/#comment-21649972</link><description>@Ken J&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I disagree with ya, bud. I was there during the Gray Davis recall and the REASON Arnold got voted in is because he was supposed to undo the financial mess Davis got the state into.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And now it's far, far worse than we he took office and that makes me crazy-angry.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Glad I don't live there any more.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 16:42:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Wolverine In 60 Seconds</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/wolverine_in_60_seconds/#comment-21649914</link><description>Thanks again, gang. I really didn't know that even in the comics Wolverine had the bone claws. I always thought his mutant ability was healing.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 10:36:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Wolverine In 60 Seconds</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/wolverine_in_60_seconds/#comment-21649900</link><description>@Rob&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I agree. Wolverine's mutant ability was the healing factor. That combined with his ferocity and the adamantium additions made him who he is.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The bone claws weren't part of the original character.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2009 22:37:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Wolverine In 60 Seconds</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/wolverine_in_60_seconds/#comment-21649896</link><description>Ok, listen - I'm not doing the equivalent of "Hugh Jackman is too tall" here. I'm just saying that based on how the metal claws look it didn't seem to be they were thick enough to have bones underneath.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;However I just took a look at the poster for the film and they're not as thin as I remember them:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://screenrant.com/official-xmen-origins-wolverine-poster-finally-vic-5260/" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://screenrant.com/official-xmen-origins-wol...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2009 20:16:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Wolverine In 60 Seconds</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/wolverine_in_60_seconds/#comment-21649892</link><description>Thanks for the feedback guys!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2009 19:07:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Wolverine In 60 Seconds</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/wolverine_in_60_seconds/#comment-21649889</link><description>@greenknight&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;You misunderstand me - I wasn't referring specifically to the trailer. Even as far as the comic book is concerned his claws are always portrayed as knife-like, so how would bones be underneath them?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I always thought (and I'm sure the original intent prior to "Origin") that the claws were just added as a weapon and he had none prior. It's just a retcon IMHO.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2009 18:48:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Wolverine In 60 Seconds</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/wolverine_in_60_seconds/#comment-21649886</link><description>Looking at Wolverine's adamantium claws there's no way there's bone beneath them.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2009 18:18:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Wolverine In 60 Seconds</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/wolverine_in_60_seconds/#comment-21649880</link><description>What's the deal with the bone claws anyway? I never read the Origins comic and I don't see how it fits into the movie - Did Weapon X replace his bone claws with adamantium ones?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2009 16:47:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Friday The 13th Movie Giveaway &amp;#8211; Winners!</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/friday_the_13th_movie_giveaway_8211_winners/#comment-21649872</link><description>@HuggyBear&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Because I'm based in the U.S. and it's expensive to ship items overseas plus deal with customs, etc.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Sorry,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2009 10:59:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Check Out The New Transformers 2 Trailer</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/check_out_the_new_transformers_2_trailer/#comment-21649864</link><description>I just watched Transformers for the first time since I saw it originally. Watched it in Blu-ray, thinking maybe I've been too hard on it.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I haven't: I still think that overall it sucks. I despise the back and forth between serious action and dumb-assed humor. It was completely incongruous and made it seem like they slammed together two different movies into one.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Jive-talking robots, robots peeing on retarded Federal agents, etc., etc. Painful to watch.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I hope they dump the stupid humor in the sequel, but I doubt it.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 21 Feb 2009 00:32:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Check Out The New Transformers 2 Trailer</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/check_out_the_new_transformers_2_trailer/#comment-21649860</link><description>@Pushpinder&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I say that regardless of my personal opinion it will indeed make buckets of cash. :-P&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 16:02:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Uh Oh &amp;#8211; Hancock is &amp;#8216;Surprisingly Sexual And Violent?&amp;#8217;</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/uh_oh_8211_hancock_is_8216surprisingly_sexual_and_violent8217/#comment-21652274</link><description>At this point I wish it WOULD come out with an R-rating. That would at least flag it as a movie for us grown-ups.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The problem is that the vast majority of parents out there don&amp;#39;t do any homework before taking their kids to see a movie beyond watching the commercials for it. So when a studio purposely "lightens up" the ad campaign, it really bugs the heck out of me.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 00:28:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: New Hulk Movie Poster, Old TV Show Vibe</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/new_hulk_movie_poster_old_tv_show_vibe/#comment-21652257</link><description>Doh! Hirogen, you&amp;#39;re right bro!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Forgot that. :-&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 00:27:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Knight Rider To Benefit From Bionic Errors</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/knight_rider_to_benefit_from_bionic_errors/#comment-21652248</link><description>Well they&amp;#39;re talking the talk - we&amp;#39;ll see if they can walk the walk. :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 00:26:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Spielberg, Jackson Find Their Tintin</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/spielberg_jackson_find_their_tintin/#comment-21652236</link><description>Mantis,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Believe it or not there are some people that don&amp;#39;t read other sites for movie news, so at least it&amp;#39;s here. We always try to be timely with our movie news posts, but sometimes it&amp;#39;s a case of better late than never.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Screen Rant isn&amp;#39;t a huge corporate sponsored site with a monster staff.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;This is still basically a small, volunteer endeavor run by me and and with a small handful of contributors, all of whom (including myself) have "day jobs."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;This week in particular has been tough keeping up because I&amp;#39;m on vacation with my family - see? Real people behind the scenes here at SR. :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Besides, this has always been more of an editorial/opinion site on movie and TV than a straight-out "latest news announcements" site.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Best regards,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 00:26:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Jericho Is Done</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/jericho_is_done/#comment-21652230</link><description>I absolutely guarantee that no "save the show" campaign will get Jericho back for another season on CBS.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The proof is in the viewership numbers. Fans had their shot and it&amp;#39;s done.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 00:26:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Klaatu To Warn Us About&amp;#8230;. Global Warming?</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/klaatu_to_warn_us_about8230_global_warming/#comment-21652229</link><description>Well I certainly won&amp;#39;t argue our destructive nature, I just think that our bigger worry is what we&amp;#39;ll do to each other.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Soldier vs soldier is one thing, but fanatics killing unarmed women and children is another thing entirely.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 00:26:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: New Iron Man, Hulk (Sort Of), And Wolverine Pictures</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/new_iron_man_hulk_sort_of_and_wolverine_pictures/#comment-21652200</link><description>Kane, it&amp;#39;s just a legacy/respect for the original thing. It&amp;#39;s not a huge issue, but just one of those little things.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 00:24:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Indiana Jones Trailer Attached To Spiderwick Chronicles</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/indiana_jones_trailer_attached_to_spiderwick_chronicles/#comment-21652177</link><description>I think the primary target audience is those old enough to have seen the first three on the big screen. :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 00:22:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Image From Iron Man Super Bowl Trailer!</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/image_from_iron_man_super_bowl_trailer/#comment-21652171</link><description>Oh, and don&amp;#39;t forget... I&amp;#39;m betting that we see our first trailer for "The Incredible Hulk" on Sunday. If we don&amp;#39;t, that&amp;#39;s a huge missed opportunity for Marvel to get the word out on THAT film.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 00:22:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Watchmen Will Be Awesome, But Leave The Kids At Home</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/watchmen_will_be_awesome_but_leave_the_kids_at_home/#comment-21651497</link><description>@G.K.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Your examples are exactly why I wrote this post.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 18:59:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: DiCaprio To Star In Nolan&amp;#8217;s &amp;#8216;Inception&amp;#8217;</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/dicaprio_to_star_in_nolan8217s_8216inception8217/#comment-21651441</link><description>I have to admit that DiCaprio has really grown on me as he's matured both as an actor and age-wise.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;He's no longer the annoying young punk from Titanic. :-P&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 12:20:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Discussion &amp;#8211; March 4, 2009</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/open_discussion_8211_march_4_2009/#comment-21651430</link><description>If Watchmen does well now, yes, it will be re-released as a director's cut in July theatrically. I think the IMAX factor will help the box office but I'm very curious as to what word of mouth will be on this.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And don't forget that Fox gets 8% of the gross as well.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 20:29:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Discussion &amp;#8211; March 4, 2009</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/open_discussion_8211_march_4_2009/#comment-21651428</link><description>@Ken X&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Do you mean WonderCon? I wish I could have attended, but from what I've read I'd have to say it was the Star Trek and Terminator Salvation trailers.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I'm waiting eagerly for the new Trek trailer to show up online so I can post it here.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 12:24:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Dollhouse &amp;amp; Sarah Connor Ratings Better Than We Think</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/dollhouse_amp_sarah_connor_ratings_better_than_we_think/#comment-21651422</link><description>@steven the git&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I sometimes do that myself. My old DirecTV box would skip in 30 second increments but my new one does a super fast forward in 30 second chunks so I can still see what I'm skipping. Sometimes something catches my eye and I'll actually stop and watch it. :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 12:18:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: New &amp;#8216;Public Enemies&amp;#8217; Poster: Why So Serious?</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/new_8216public_enemies8217_poster_why_so_serious/#comment-21651404</link><description>@SK47&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thanks, man. One of these days I'll have to actually take a Photoshop class instead of just stumbling through the program. :-P&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 12:19:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Watchmen Interactive Site = Fun &amp;amp; New Footage</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/watchmen_interactive_site_fun_amp_new_footage/#comment-21651370</link><description>@Jordan&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Well unfortunately (for me) I have to abide by the review embargo and can't publish mine until Friday.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 17:30:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: New Terminator Salvation Trailer, Posters &amp;amp; Photos</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/new_terminator_salvation_trailer_posters_amp_photos/#comment-21651313</link><description>Looking better and better. I think when this comes out McG is going to be able to give everyone who doubted him the biggest finger ever, and he'll finally shake his Charlie's Angels label. :-P&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 09:54:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Watchmen Wows At Wonder Con</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/watchmen_wows_at_wonder_con/#comment-21651262</link><description>@Gary&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I'm not sure if they're releasing all the versions at the same time or not, but I think they are.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 10:05:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Tired Of Remakes? The Next Trend: Movies Based On Board Games</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/tired_of_remakes_the_next_trend_movies_based_on_board_games/#comment-21649834</link><description>Max Payne cost $35MM and earned $40MM in the US plus $45MM overseas.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2009 16:46:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Nearly Every &amp;#8216;Transformers 2&amp;#8242; Robot Revealed!</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/nearly_every_8216transformers_28242_robot_revealed/#comment-21649781</link><description>I realize that toys are always very simplified versions of the movie version, but if the bots in the movie were just more detailed versions of those above that would be a vast improvement over robots composed of what seem to be 2 million parts.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 15 Feb 2009 23:57:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Remaking Of Pelham 123</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/the_remaking_of_pelham_123/#comment-21649770</link><description>@Gary&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I had the exact same reaction. What the hell was that? A wife too tough to tell her husband she's worried about him? Sheesh.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 15 Feb 2009 22:58:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Gemini Man: One Of The Coolest Movie Concepts Ever</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/gemini_man_one_of_the_coolest_movie_concepts_ever/#comment-21649756</link><description>LOL, well I think the idea is more like someone in their 60's vs. the early 30's version. :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If done right I think this would be a great popcorn flick.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 00:44:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Gemini Man: One Of The Coolest Movie Concepts Ever</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/gemini_man_one_of_the_coolest_movie_concepts_ever/#comment-21649743</link><description>I think present day Bruce Willis and Stallone could beat the crap out of their younger versions, hands down. :-P&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 15 Feb 2009 23:00:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Dollhouse &amp;amp; Sarah Connor Ratings: Mediocre To Awful</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/dollhouse_amp_sarah_connor_ratings_mediocre_to_awful/#comment-21649712</link><description>I hated the choice they made for the actor who portrayed Kyle Reese. Hated it.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Like Ken said, looked like a teenage kid who tried really hard to grow a patchy scruff beard to look older.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 15 Feb 2009 23:02:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: James Cameron&amp;#8217;s &amp;#8216;Avatar&amp;#8217; Already Has A Toy Line</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/james_cameron8217s_8216avatar8217_already_has_a_toy_line/#comment-21649691</link><description>This is one of those weird mystery things to me... creating toys for movies that are not appropriate for kids.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Makes no sense at all.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 14 Feb 2009 23:09:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The &amp;#8216;Twilight&amp;#8217; Mystique &amp;#8211; And Why It&amp;#8217;s Undeserved</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/the_8216twilight8217_mystique_8211_and_why_it8217s_undeserved/#comment-21649663</link><description>Ladies,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;There was one paragraph in particular in Carl's comment that I thought was over the line. I've deleted that paragraph and I apologize for any offense.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Sincerely,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic Holtreman&lt;br&gt;Editor-in-Chief: &lt;a href="http://ScreenRant.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;ScreenRant.com&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 10:13:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The &amp;#8216;Twilight&amp;#8217; Mystique &amp;#8211; And Why It&amp;#8217;s Undeserved</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/the_8216twilight8217_mystique_8211_and_why_it8217s_undeserved/#comment-21649659</link><description>Wow Carl - that drug comment is over the top IMHO.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 23:07:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The &amp;#8216;Twilight&amp;#8217; Mystique &amp;#8211; And Why It&amp;#8217;s Undeserved</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/the_8216twilight8217_mystique_8211_and_why_it8217s_undeserved/#comment-21649646</link><description>@Kristina&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I challenge you to find anything condescending about the comment I left in this thread. As a matter of fact one of the two comments I left said this:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;"You know one thing I have to say about most Twilight fans when it comes to discussions like this: Although you disagree for the most part you’re polite, civil and articulate and we at Screen Rant REALLY appreciate that!"&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I didn't write this article, so why are you attacking me? Or are you referring to something someone else said?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2009 15:57:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The &amp;#8216;Twilight&amp;#8217; Mystique &amp;#8211; And Why It&amp;#8217;s Undeserved</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/the_8216twilight8217_mystique_8211_and_why_it8217s_undeserved/#comment-21649606</link><description>You know one thing I have to say about most Twilight fans when it comes to discussions like this: Although you disagree for the most part you're polite, civil and articulate and we at Screen Rant REALLY appreciate that!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Best regards,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic (Screen Rant Editor-in-Chief)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 15 Feb 2009 23:59:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The &amp;#8216;Twilight&amp;#8217; Mystique &amp;#8211; And Why It&amp;#8217;s Undeserved</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/the_8216twilight8217_mystique_8211_and_why_it8217s_undeserved/#comment-21649602</link><description>@Dustin&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Don't apologize, Carl's article has generated some great discussion here!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 15 Feb 2009 23:12:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Dollhouse Premiere = Creepy Concept (&amp;amp; Characters)</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/dollhouse_premiere_creepy_concept_amp_characters/#comment-21649542</link><description>Aaaand another cowardly troll has been banished.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 14 Feb 2009 14:07:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Dollhouse Premiere = Creepy Concept (&amp;amp; Characters)</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/dollhouse_premiere_creepy_concept_amp_characters/#comment-21649541</link><description>@Bruce&lt;br&gt;Thanks for chiming in - I was wondering what you thought of the premiere.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;@Benno&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thanks for catching that error! I've fixed it. :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 14 Feb 2009 12:39:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Dollhouse Premiere = Creepy Concept (&amp;amp; Characters)</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/dollhouse_premiere_creepy_concept_amp_characters/#comment-21649535</link><description>LOL, no, they didn't have that cliche scene in this episode. :-P&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 14 Feb 2009 02:52:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Bunch Of New Street Fighter Pictures</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/bunch_of_new_street_fighter_pictures/#comment-21649517</link><description>@JMoney&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Moon = Maya&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And those were all the new pics available.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2009 23:19:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The International Review</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/the_international_review/#comment-21649509</link><description>@Reverend&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Well there were parts that were slower and while other reviewers are complaining about those I rather enjoyed them.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2009 10:38:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Christopher Nolan&amp;#8217;s Next Movie Is NOT Batman 3</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/christopher_nolan8217s_next_movie_is_not_batman_3/#comment-21649497</link><description>LOL, damn... great idea. But it's late, I just edited 3 posts and wrote a review. I'm tired. :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2009 01:49:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: New Wolverine Pics Here &amp;amp; Three Trailers Coming!</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/new_wolverine_pics_here_amp_three_trailers_coming/#comment-21649488</link><description>I'm 5'10" and I met Patrick Stewart once. I towered over him. Freaked me out because he was the captain of the Enterprise!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Robert Downey Jr. is shorter than me too if I recall correctly.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2009 23:58:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: New Wolverine Pics Here &amp;amp; Three Trailers Coming!</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/new_wolverine_pics_here_amp_three_trailers_coming/#comment-21649484</link><description>@Ken J&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Ok, maybe 5'6" is a little short but many actors are 5'9" and shorter:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://usedwigs.com/hollywood-height-chart/" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://usedwigs.com/hollywood-height-chart/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2009 23:18:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: New Wolverine Pics Here &amp;amp; Three Trailers Coming!</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/new_wolverine_pics_here_amp_three_trailers_coming/#comment-21649481</link><description>@Ken J&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Are you kidding? Do you know how many leading actors and actresses in Hollywood are 5'6" and under? A ton!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2009 21:20:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: New Wolverine Pics Here &amp;amp; Three Trailers Coming!</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/new_wolverine_pics_here_amp_three_trailers_coming/#comment-21649478</link><description>Perhaps they didn't go with Tyler Mane in this one because some actual "acting" was required. :-P&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2009 18:44:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Friday The 13th Review</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/friday_the_13th_review/#comment-21649458</link><description>@Johnny&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Maybe he's wearing a neck brace in addition to that hockey mask, lol.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 21 Feb 2009 13:37:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Friday The 13th Review</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/friday_the_13th_review/#comment-21649455</link><description>Alex, what can I say? I liked this latest one.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And the first one was of course totally creepy throughout the first time I saw it. :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 21 Feb 2009 11:53:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Friday The 13th Review</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/friday_the_13th_review/#comment-21649452</link><description>You know, today I just re-watched the original Friday the 13th for the first time in many years.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Those who are complaining about lack of plot and character development in this latest film REALLY need to go re-watch the original again then come back and tell me how much of each of those that film contains. :-P&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 21 Feb 2009 01:00:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Friday The 13th Review</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/friday_the_13th_review/#comment-21649445</link><description>Alex,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Well I'm certainly not going to take the blame for your losing your girlfriend. :-P&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;What can I say? It's a Friday the 13th movie and on that level I enjoyed the hell out of it. I don't expect deep character development or Oscar winning performances from a movie like this: I expect a visceral thrill and for me it delivered on that level.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 09:49:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Friday The 13th Review</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/friday_the_13th_review/#comment-21649439</link><description>@Ramey&lt;br&gt;No problem, I love having articulate and passionate commenters like you visit the site.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;@darthbalo&lt;br&gt;Sorry, dude - I enjoyed it. I *did* mention in my review that I predicted fans would probably be split on this. :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I will admit that the rest of the movie never did measure up to those intense opening 15-20 minutes.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2009 00:45:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Friday The 13th Review</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/friday_the_13th_review/#comment-21649436</link><description>@Ramey&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It's interesting you enjoyed the Texas Chainsaw Massacre remake because the same director did this one.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;My point about the remake is that (much like last year's Iron Man) they changed the origin year and moved it to the late 70s/1980 much like with Iron Man they changed Vietnam in the 60s to present day Afghanistan.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I'm generally not a fan of remakes but I thought this one was all right - then again I'm not as attached to the original films as you obviously are.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I can appreciate your passion for the horror genre - I have a similar one for superhero and sci-fi.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;BTW, a suggestion - if you would break up your comment into a few paragraphs it would make it easier to read. Just a thought. :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Best regards,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2009 00:05:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Friday The 13th Review</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/friday_the_13th_review/#comment-21649434</link><description>@Ramey&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Take a breath dude - this was a REMAKE/REBOOT. Jason was a young kid in 1980, not 1955. I thought that was pretty obvious.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Tunnels: Good question, gotta admit that.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Holding the girl captive: She looks like his mother. Remember the scene where her boyfriend found the necklace and says "she looks like you?"&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Jason killed the barn guy because he was going onto Jason's property to get the weed.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And they did do the familiar sounds right at the opening of the movie, even before the opening credits. I don't recall if they used it during the movie - don't think they did though.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;As to plot and all that, how much plot did the original couple of Friday the 13th films have? I'm not saying this is Oscar material, but it is what it is.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 15 Feb 2009 23:07:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Friday The 13th Review</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/friday_the_13th_review/#comment-21649424</link><description>@Rev&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Yeah, I try to review movies within the context of what they're trying to accomplish. I actually bumped up my rating on this one from 3 to 3.5/5 after thinking about it.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2009 20:24:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Friday The 13th Review</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/friday_the_13th_review/#comment-21649422</link><description>@Smitty&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Let us know what you thought!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2009 18:44:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Friday The 13th Review</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/friday_the_13th_review/#comment-21649420</link><description>@Ody&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I'm with you. "PG-13 horror movie" is an oxymoron as far as I'm concerned.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2009 16:06:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Friday The 13th Review</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/friday_the_13th_review/#comment-21649417</link><description>Yes, I mean the actual events. He's not super-powered and he can't magically beat someone who's running to their destination.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Oh, and Ken... you'll LOVE the scene in the film involving a gun. :-P&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2009 01:32:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Rumor: Wachowskis To Direct Superman Trilogy? [Updated]</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/rumor_wachowskis_to_direct_superman_trilogy_updated/#comment-21649392</link><description>@greenknight&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;What you call "deep" I call "pretentious and self-indulgent." :-P&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2009 20:36:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Rumor: Wachowskis To Direct Superman Trilogy? [Updated]</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/rumor_wachowskis_to_direct_superman_trilogy_updated/#comment-21649386</link><description>@T&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;You're joking, right?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2009 17:02:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Autobot Showcase Video… But Where’s Ratchet?</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/autobot_showcase_video_but_wheres_ratchet/#comment-21649324</link><description>I didn't find it entertaining, I found it frustrating. Every time I started to get even remotely into the cool/serious/action side of the movie, it would abruptly cut to some stupid humor sequence.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I felt whiplashed back and forth through the whole film. As a matter of fact it felt like two different, incongruous movies intercut into one.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 22:53:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Autobot Showcase Video… But Where’s Ratchet?</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/autobot_showcase_video_but_wheres_ratchet/#comment-21649316</link><description>@Alpha Trion&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Welcome to Screen Rant, you should feel right at home here. :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2009 18:42:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: First Review of Watchmen Is In!</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/first_review_of_watchmen_is_in/#comment-21649302</link><description>@J Biz&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The Stimulus Bill.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2009 16:05:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: New Angels And Demons Trailer</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/new_angels_and_demons_trailer/#comment-21649275</link><description>I'm betting we just saw everything exciting that happens in the movie.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 23:16:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Will &amp;#8216;The Hurt Locker&amp;#8217; Be Boring?</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/will_8216the_hurt_locker8217_be_boring/#comment-21649270</link><description>Heh... I wonder what site that would be? Haven't heard anything. :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Anyway, I feel like you guys (especially Kurt) are the polar opposite of Screen Rant. :-P&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 17:58:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Will &amp;#8216;The Hurt Locker&amp;#8217; Be Boring?</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/will_8216the_hurt_locker8217_be_boring/#comment-21649268</link><description>LOL, I love you RowThree guys but you sure are dogpiling on me here. :-P&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 17:17:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Will &amp;#8216;The Hurt Locker&amp;#8217; Be Boring?</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/will_8216the_hurt_locker8217_be_boring/#comment-21649265</link><description>Andrew,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I DO encourage INTELLIGENT discussion and dialog here. Ask ANY of my regular readers.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 11:59:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Will &amp;#8216;The Hurt Locker&amp;#8217; Be Boring?</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/will_8216the_hurt_locker8217_be_boring/#comment-21649263</link><description>Yes Andrew, really. I moderate comments here at Screen Rant. If someone is being an obvious troll (plus posting using multiple usernames to defend their own position) and their comments aren't contributing to the conversation, yes, I will stop it.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Why do you think the conversations here at Screen Rant don't get out of control like they do on most every other movie site?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;My house, my rules.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 11:31:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Will &amp;#8216;The Hurt Locker&amp;#8217; Be Boring?</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/will_8216the_hurt_locker8217_be_boring/#comment-21649259</link><description>@Jo/Lisa&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Let it go, will you? There are trailers we've run for movies on this site that I've had no intention of seeing.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Last time I checked it's still a free country, and we can all decide which movies to see. We've run trailers for movies here that look like crap, and turn out to be crap. In my experience it's VERY rare that a bad trailer portends a great movie - usually it's the opposite, where they craftily assemble a trailer and make a movie look good that in fact turns out to be lame (and before you go nuts, I'm not saying that's the case here).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I don't think Sabrina said that she would definitely not go see it based on the footage, so you need to just chill out. I'm getting tired of your comments, honestly - they're getting quite repetitive and I'm being gracious in allowing you to continue to beat a dead horse.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;For now.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2009 18:23:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Will &amp;#8216;The Hurt Locker&amp;#8217; Be Boring?</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/will_8216the_hurt_locker8217_be_boring/#comment-21649246</link><description>Oh, and by the way - you're so astute that you never even noticed that *I* didn't write this article, it was one of my writers, Sabrina.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 14 Feb 2009 16:55:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Will &amp;#8216;The Hurt Locker&amp;#8217; Be Boring?</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/will_8216the_hurt_locker8217_be_boring/#comment-21649245</link><description>LOL, yes Lisa, continue to make yourself look good.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Stalker? ROFLMAO! I was trying to have a reasonable discussion with you in hopes of making you see we're not one sided. Obviously you are of a certain political persuasion that believes in free speech - as long as it agrees with your point of view.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;AGAIN, I point out that I didn't delete your comment out of hand and was nothing but respectful and polite in my replies to you.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 14 Feb 2009 16:54:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Will &amp;#8216;The Hurt Locker&amp;#8217; Be Boring?</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/will_8216the_hurt_locker8217_be_boring/#comment-21649243</link><description>Wow. Some people just can't get over themselves... I'm going to share an email conversation I had here since "Lisa" is now blocking my emails.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;You tell me who is rude and who is not...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;From Lisa in response to my comment above:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;"LOL...why do you have a place on your website for comments on your writing if you can't take the criticism against it mate? ....Listen no offense to you? BUT...if you are going to have a blog about films and allow people to comment about what you write than at least have the courage to accept the good with the bad..I have a problem with people bad mouthing anything they haven't seen to its completion and I realize it is one man's opinion and respect that...but if you are going to have us comment and than don't like the comments than perhaps you shouldn't be blogging about films in the first place..."&lt;br&gt;===&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;To which I replied:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;LOL, did I delete your comment? No, I did not because although you disagreed it was intelligent and added to the conversation(and you would have been welcome to post what you said below on the site as well).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;My point was not that you were disagreeing... I encourage debate on the site (and if you click around and look at some of the discussions you'll see that), I just wanted to correct this statement, which was inaccurate:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;"people who havent actually SEEN a film in it's entirety are writting REVIEWS about it"&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;So are we not supposed to comment on movie trailers, clips and footage that the studios put out there to promote their films? All we can go on is what is shown. If the overall film is better perhaps they should have shown footage that was more representative of that.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The only comments I delete are those that personally attack the author or fellow commenters.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Sincerely,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic&lt;br&gt;====&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And her reply to that civil and polite email:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;"Mate look...LOL..I didn't expect this big a response back from you..I simply was taking the liberty of leaving a free and open comment against what you wrote in your article...I'm not looking to argue "egos" over this...I disagreed with you, based on the fact that I have seen this entire film, met this film's director, spoke to the film's writer...and have some further knowledge to aforementioned...trust me if I thought this film was pure crap after I saw it? I'd let them know I disliked it..I have no problem with that ..LOL...But I do have some issues with anyone making early judgement calls just on spoilers or trailers..mostly because they have an audience..much like Rush Limbaugh does...who take everything they say and write? Literally...and they may be missing out? on a seeing a really incredibly good film ..because they read that a movie might be "boring" and a waste of time to see..based on one spoiler of it...that's all...the end...."&lt;br&gt;===&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;So fine, another olive branch from me:&lt;br&gt;Generally early peeks at films do represent the final product. If we're wrong in the end, we're not afraid to admit it and we do so.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Best regards,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic&lt;br&gt;===&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And her final reply, after which I was no longer able to send her an email:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Dear "Rush" ..LOL&lt;br&gt; &lt;br&gt;I rest my case....Hack and Wannabe but ..not much "else"...&lt;br&gt; &lt;br&gt;Good luck with your one sided "blogging" ...I recommend you take down the free comments part..you obviously have an ego too large for your own head and arent worth this arguement....The fact you have an audience? Is "scary" to me..As long as they agree with you? You are fine...But if they don't? Emails go on and on mate...lol...Sad really but don't worry...I won't find the need to "visit" your website any longer..I know a hack when I see him...LOL&lt;br&gt;===&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Nice, huh?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And please note that her original comment here has NOT been deleted.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The things you have to put up with when you run a website.... sheesh.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 14 Feb 2009 16:04:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Will &amp;#8216;The Hurt Locker&amp;#8217; Be Boring?</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/will_8216the_hurt_locker8217_be_boring/#comment-21649242</link><description>@Lisa&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Where does this article state that it's a review of the film? It's an opinion piece based on the footage that was shown. If the overall film works better than the scene that was shown, that's great - but don't accuse us of writing an entire movie review for a film we haven't seen.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 14 Feb 2009 15:15:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Sneak Peek At &amp;#8216;Inglourious Basterds&amp;#8217; Trailer!</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/sneak_peek_at_8216inglourious_basterds8217_trailer/#comment-21649066</link><description>A war movie might just be right up Tarantino's alley. I'll give this a chance.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 00:05:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Sneak Peek At &amp;#8216;Inglourious Basterds&amp;#8217; Trailer!</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/sneak_peek_at_8216inglourious_basterds8217_trailer/#comment-21649064</link><description>@Tim&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I enjoyed "Planet Terror" on the level you describe, but "Death Proof" was an excruciating bore to sit through.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2009 15:14:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Sneak Peek At &amp;#8216;Inglourious Basterds&amp;#8217; Trailer!</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/sneak_peek_at_8216inglourious_basterds8217_trailer/#comment-21649062</link><description>Death Proof was one of the most horrible movie-going experiences of my entire life.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2009 14:58:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: And &amp;#8216;The Flash&amp;#8217; Might Be&amp;#8230; Neil Patrick Harris?</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/and_8216the_flash8217_might_be8230_neil_patrick_harris/#comment-21649043</link><description>Um, this would be a gay actor portraying a straight superhero. The Flash is not gay.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 13:11:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: And &amp;#8216;The Flash&amp;#8217; Might Be&amp;#8230; Neil Patrick Harris?</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/and_8216the_flash8217_might_be8230_neil_patrick_harris/#comment-21649034</link><description>Hey gang,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;So sorry for omitting "Dr. Horrible." I've updated the post with that info. Believe it or not, I haven't seen that and that's why it slipped my mind. :-P&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2009 19:47:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: NY Comic Con: Summit Entertainment Panel</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/ny_comic_con_summit_entertainment_panel/#comment-21648981</link><description>Sabrina is working on a write-up for the Up panel.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 10:40:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: NY Comic Con 2009: Fringe Panel</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/ny_comic_con_2009_fringe_panel/#comment-21648971</link><description>LOL, someone just twittered me a link to the video of the neuroscientist hat schtick:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.thebadandugly.com/2009/02/09/david-jr-connects-with-anna-torv-comic-con" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.thebadandugly.com/2009/02/09/david-j...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;:-P&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 13:07:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Babylon A.D. Blu-ray Review</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/babylon_ad_blu_ray_review/#comment-21648960</link><description>@INK&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;LOL, sorry, man... But believe me, I was due. My last TV was over 10 years old and I *do* run a movie/TV site after all. :-P&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Actually got a screamin' deal on it or I wouldn't have bought it. It's a Sony and I think I got it for under $1,500.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 17:22:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Babylon A.D. Blu-ray Review</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/babylon_ad_blu_ray_review/#comment-21648958</link><description>@Evie&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Yeah, that ending definitely left me with the same reaction.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 13:39:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: NY Comic Con 2009: Terminator Salvation Panel</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/ny_comic_con_2009_terminator_salvation_panel/#comment-21648922</link><description>@Lord Garth&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Oops, delete that one by mistake. You can repost it minus the profanity if you like.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 08 Feb 2009 15:43:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: NY Comic Con 2009: Terminator Salvation Panel</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/ny_comic_con_2009_terminator_salvation_panel/#comment-21648916</link><description>Nice. I tend to think that McG takes a lot of heat that he doesn't deserve. Maybe if he stopped going by that "handle" and just used his actual name a lot of that would go away. :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 08 Feb 2009 01:44:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Screen Rant Technical Stuff</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/screen_rant_technical_stuff/#comment-21648901</link><description>Hey David, I appreciate your keeping an eye out for the site. Some ads do cause problems and I've had to disable those in the past.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And thanks for the kind words, bro. We work hard over here. :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2009 11:35:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: What The Heck Is Going On With Iron Man 2?</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/what_the_heck_is_going_on_with_iron_man_2/#comment-21650064</link><description>@ppnkof&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Totally agree.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 14:07:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Has &amp;#8216;The System&amp;#8217; Driven Joss Whedon To Quit TV?</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/has_8216the_system8217_driven_joss_whedon_to_quit_tv/#comment-21650045</link><description>@undead&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;How can Joss Whedon suck if he brought us Firefly and Serenity?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 18:09:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Wolverine In 60 Seconds: Part 3</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/wolverine_in_60_seconds_part_3/#comment-21650029</link><description>@Gigan&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;So many characters is indeed a concern, but it looks like they're going to be focusing on Wolverine, Sabretooth and possibly Deadpool.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 17:35:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Wolverine In 60 Seconds: Part 3</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/wolverine_in_60_seconds_part_3/#comment-21650027</link><description>@Oscar&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Sorry, just sounded a bit "in your face" when I read it. :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 16:49:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Wolverine In 60 Seconds: Part 3</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/wolverine_in_60_seconds_part_3/#comment-21650025</link><description>@Gigan300&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Why, exactly? To me this is actually looking better with each new clip.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;@Oscar&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Come on, dude.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 16:40:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Wolverine In 60 Seconds: Part 3</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/wolverine_in_60_seconds_part_3/#comment-21650011</link><description>I'm sure it will be made clear in the film but I was confused about seeing Cyclops in the film. I know it spans a large amount of time, but I didn't think part of it took place recently enough for Cyclops to be even in his early 20s.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 11:14:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Discussion &amp;#8211; February 18, 2009</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/open_discussion_8211_february_18_2009/#comment-21650006</link><description>Really enjoying this season of 24.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;As to Watchmen, they didn't say. The studio puts an embargo on movie reviews so they can't say much prior to the date they can publish their reviews.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 21:11:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Discussion &amp;#8211; February 18, 2009</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/open_discussion_8211_february_18_2009/#comment-21650001</link><description>I'll be writing up that Mickey Rourke story soon.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 17:34:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Discussion &amp;#8211; February 18, 2009</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/open_discussion_8211_february_18_2009/#comment-21649998</link><description>@Larry&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Don't know yet. No doubt just a few days before you will. :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 16:39:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Discussion &amp;#8211; February 18, 2009</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/open_discussion_8211_february_18_2009/#comment-21649994</link><description>A few of my movie blogger friends who live in LA got to see Watchmen last night - and every single one of them is saying it was incredible.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 11:12:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Screen Rant Technical Stuff</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/screen_rant_technical_stuff/#comment-21648899</link><description>Thanks, John. Everything seems to be back to normal, with the exception of some issues on the home page with the proper thumbnail images displaying.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 12:58:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Screen Rant Technical Stuff</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/screen_rant_technical_stuff/#comment-21648897</link><description>It's not hijacking, it's an ad. Sorry for the inconvenience but we've got to do what we can. Believe me I turn down a LOT of ads on the site that I think would be annoying. I don't do "flashing" ads, ads that have audio that plays automatically, popups, or things like that.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Believe me, it could be worse. :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 08 Feb 2009 10:50:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: New Details About Watchmen&amp;#8217;s &amp;#8216;Black Freighter&amp;#8217; Tie-in</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/new_details_about_watchmen8217s_8216black_freighter8217_tie_in/#comment-21648872</link><description>@greenknight&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;We're having some site funkiness going on today. Your comments should be visible now.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 17:23:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Transformers 2 Behind The Scenes Pictures</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/transformers_2_behind_the_scenes_pictures/#comment-21648862</link><description>Sorry we had to remove these, folks!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 16:52:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Push Review</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/push_review/#comment-21648841</link><description>Oh, and let's add to that having to browser through 200+ porn/spam comments a day to make sure none of your comments are caught in the spam filter by accident.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I'd love to just hit the delete button every day on those, but I don't.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 08 Feb 2009 11:20:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Push Review</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/push_review/#comment-21648840</link><description>OK... guys, I appreciate what you're saying - I really do. And I do my best around here but I'm starting to get annoyed.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Do you know how many comments we get here every day sitewide? Hundreds. I try to read EVERY comment in order to make sure the tone is civil and people aren't attacking each other - but with the volume sometimes I have to skim. Other webmasters let EVERYTHING through and don't moderate.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;My point stands: You're defending a guy who rips my review and hasn't even SEEN the movie. So that's cool, then?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I work a full time job, I write for the site, I'm the editor for over half a dozen writers, and on the day that comment was posted Screen Rant was having technical issues that had the site offline for more than two hours (which is a VERY big deal). That continued with me trying to get the site fixed ALL day on Saturday on into midnight.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;So while yes, you're right... Try to keep in mind I'm not Jesus Christ and I'm not perfect... so maybe you could cut ME as much as slack as you're cutting him, eh?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thanks,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 08 Feb 2009 10:58:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Push Review</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/push_review/#comment-21648838</link><description>@Jon&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thanks, I *am* passionate about film, that's why I started this site and why I put so much work into it every day.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I enjoy visitors who can put forth their opinions intelligently, even if they disagree with mine and I look forward to your becoming a regular visitor. :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Best,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 08 Feb 2009 01:52:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Push Review</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/push_review/#comment-21648836</link><description>@Jon&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Whatever. The whole sniffing concept is still stupid IMHO.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;@Sylar's Hunger&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Considering Alex wrote a 200+ word slam of my review WITHOUT HIS HAVING SEEN THE MOVIE and all I basically replied with was a short sentence saying just that, I think my reply was completely justified.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Good Lord, you'd think I said something about the guy's mother.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 07 Feb 2009 19:42:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Push Review</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/push_review/#comment-21648829</link><description>@Freak&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thanks, bud. You should poke around here and read some other reviews - maybe you'll agree and become a regular here. :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 20:35:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Push Review</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/push_review/#comment-21648822</link><description>ROFLMAO @Alex&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Have you even SEEN the movie prior to ripping me on my review?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 13:31:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: &amp;#8216;Casino Royale&amp;#8217; Director To Helm &amp;#8216;Green Lantern?&amp;#8217;</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/8216casino_royale8217_director_to_helm_8216green_lantern8217/#comment-21648794</link><description>@greenknight&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I've gone through the spam folder and pulled out your comment. I don't know why it was flagged, but it wasn't the only one.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 23:16:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Welcome To The Dollhouse-Terminator Promo Video</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/welcome_to_the_dollhouse_terminator_promo_video/#comment-21648778</link><description>@Ken J&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;LOL, you know that's a good point that hadn't occurred to me. I've increased the number of posts that appear on the home page from 20 to 30. :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2009 01:33:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Welcome To The Dollhouse-Terminator Promo Video</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/welcome_to_the_dollhouse_terminator_promo_video/#comment-21648774</link><description>@Ken J&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;That's the first I've ever heard of a problem like that.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2009 16:34:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: New Watchmen Video: No Vigilantes!</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/new_watchmen_video_no_vigilantes/#comment-21648709</link><description>@greenknight&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I'm old but I'm not THAT old. :-P&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 00:34:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Tron 2 To Give Jeff Bridges Digital Plastic Surgery</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/tron_2_to_give_jeff_bridges_digital_plastic_surgery/#comment-21648697</link><description>@Ken J&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;You've never seen Tron? Go rent it! It's a bit dated but I think it's still VERY cool.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 10:43:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Discussion &amp;#8211; February 4, 2009</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/open_discussion_8211_february_4_2009/#comment-21648668</link><description>Heath will be writing up a "Hulk vs." review sometime in the next 7-10 days.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 11:43:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Discussion &amp;#8211; February 4, 2009</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/open_discussion_8211_february_4_2009/#comment-21648664</link><description>Unfortunately Outlander isn’t playing anywhere within driving distance for me.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 10:41:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Mickey Rourke NOT The Crimson Dynamo In Iron Man 2</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/mickey_rourke_not_the_crimson_dynamo_in_iron_man_2/#comment-21648651</link><description>@Oscar&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Yes, Tropic Thunder was great but it's a COMPLETELY different genre of movie.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 15:10:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Mickey Rourke NOT The Crimson Dynamo In Iron Man 2</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/mickey_rourke_not_the_crimson_dynamo_in_iron_man_2/#comment-21648648</link><description>Although Favreau is back to direct I really don't know what to expect with the sequel. Remember, we have a completely different writer on this one, not the same guys who wrote the first one. And this guy's claim to fame is Tropic Thunder.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I'll be keeping a close watch on development of this one, folks.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 10:45:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Mickey Rourke NOT The Crimson Dynamo In Iron Man 2</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/mickey_rourke_not_the_crimson_dynamo_in_iron_man_2/#comment-21648642</link><description>I think they're saving Mandarin for the third film.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 23:36:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Mickey Rourke NOT The Crimson Dynamo In Iron Man 2</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/mickey_rourke_not_the_crimson_dynamo_in_iron_man_2/#comment-21648640</link><description>Man... I *hate* it when I'm wrong. :-P&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 23:00:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Day-Lewis and Del Toro May Star in Scorsese&amp;#8217;s &amp;#8216;Silence&amp;#8217;</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/day_lewis_and_del_toro_may_star_in_scorsese8217s_8216silence8217/#comment-21648638</link><description>@greenknight&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thanks, bud. I'm having the weekend from hell dealing with server problems.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 07 Feb 2009 21:37:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Day-Lewis and Del Toro May Star in Scorsese&amp;#8217;s &amp;#8216;Silence&amp;#8217;</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/day_lewis_and_del_toro_may_star_in_scorsese8217s_8216silence8217/#comment-21648634</link><description>What dates are you referring to? Everything seems fine to me.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 07 Feb 2009 19:37:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Heroes &amp;#8216;Fugitives&amp;#8217; Chapter: Back To Basics?</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/heroes_8216fugitives8217_chapter_back_to_basics/#comment-21648571</link><description>@huntthejest&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;em&gt;"here you can wind back like 30 seconds and stop something from happening."&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;THAT was one of the BIGGEST problems with last season. Huge problem IMHO right from the get-go.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;- Speed-girl snatches the formula as soon as Hiro opens the safe.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;- Hiro stops time fast enough to catch her in the office.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;- Instead of grabbing the formula out of her hand, Hiro stops to chat with her. (duh)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;- She knocks him out and gets away. Um, go back in time to before you opened the safe and DON'T OPEN IT.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Problem solved.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 10:46:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Heroes &amp;#8216;Fugitives&amp;#8217; Chapter: Back To Basics?</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/heroes_8216fugitives8217_chapter_back_to_basics/#comment-21648557</link><description>@ParrotSoup&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;What the hell, I'll pop open a can of worms.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;My point was that he was OK with the idea until it affected him personally. What came to my mind was the gun control folks: Talking about how dangerous guns are and how laws should be more restrictive and law abiding citizens shouldn't be allowed to carry them...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;...and then suddenly being faced with a mugger late at night pointing a gun at them and their family, or having an armed robber break into their home in the middle of the night.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Suddenly keeping guns out of the hands of law abiding citizens might not sound like such a great idea after all.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 18:35:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Heroes &amp;#8216;Fugitives&amp;#8217; Chapter: Back To Basics?</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/heroes_8216fugitives8217_chapter_back_to_basics/#comment-21648551</link><description>@Mark&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Funny, I had the exact same reaction when she was the first person to appear in the episode.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 15:34:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Heroes &amp;#8216;Fugitives&amp;#8217; Chapter: Back To Basics?</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/heroes_8216fugitives8217_chapter_back_to_basics/#comment-21648548</link><description>@Bill Blume&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;em&gt;"One thing I am glad not to see at work, right now, is all the time-travel business."&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Amen to THAT!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 14:33:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Heroes &amp;#8216;Fugitives&amp;#8217; Chapter: Back To Basics?</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/heroes_8216fugitives8217_chapter_back_to_basics/#comment-21648539</link><description>@Gary&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;They're mixing up broadcast times/formats so much now that it's getting confusing. This is a new chapter, but with the gap between "chapters" I would pretty much say you could call this a new season, or maybe season 3.5?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 09:28:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Eagle Eye Blu-ray Review</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/eagle_eye_blu_ray_review/#comment-21648526</link><description>@HOMER&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I don't do a lot of DVD-type reviews because frankly it takes a ton of time to go over not only the movie, but director's commentary (double the movie watching time) plus all the special features.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Before I buy a Blu-ray disc I head over to Amazon and I check the reviews in regards to picture and audio quality.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 18:31:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Super Sneak Preview: Sam Raimi&amp;#8217;s &amp;#8216;Drag Me To Hell&amp;#8217;</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/super_sneak_preview_sam_raimi8217s_8216drag_me_to_hell8217/#comment-21648521</link><description>Hopefully Raimi will fine tune this between now and May. I'm a HUGE fan of Evil Dead and Army of Darkness and from what I saw at Comic-Con last summer it seemed like he recaptured that vibe.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2009 21:44:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Slumdog Millionaire Star Cast In The Last Airbender</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/slumdog_millionaire_star_cast_in_the_last_airbender/#comment-21648504</link><description>Doh! I responded to the wrong thread  re: Outlander. :-P&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 10:41:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Slumdog Millionaire Star Cast In The Last Airbender</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/slumdog_millionaire_star_cast_in_the_last_airbender/#comment-21648503</link><description>@HuggyBear&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Sometimes it takes a while to show up. Make sure that at &lt;a href="http://Gravatar.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;Gravatar.com&lt;/a&gt; you've chosen an avatar that is rated PG or lower, otherwise it won't display here.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 10:41:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Slumdog Millionaire Star Cast In The Last Airbender</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/slumdog_millionaire_star_cast_in_the_last_airbender/#comment-21648502</link><description>Unfortunately Outlander isn't playing anywhere within driving distance for me.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 10:39:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Four New Terminator: Salvation Images</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/four_new_terminator_salvation_images/#comment-21648480</link><description>I think Common has the chops. Hell, if we can take Dwayne "The Rock" Johnson as an actor, why not him? :-P&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2009 16:54:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Are You Looking Forward To 3D Movies?</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/are_you_looking_forward_to_3d_movies/#comment-21648467</link><description>@Philbert&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I agree completely. It's the equivalent of an expensive steak restaurant advertising by giving away McDonalds cheeseburgers.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;That's a big, fat fail for Dreamworks/Paramount.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 21:04:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Are You Looking Forward To 3D Movies?</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/are_you_looking_forward_to_3d_movies/#comment-21648463</link><description>@Ken J&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Because they used red/blue in the big promotion for the Super Bowl commercial, and DVD versions of 3D films use those crappy old glasses.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 09:29:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Are You Looking Forward To 3D Movies?</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/are_you_looking_forward_to_3d_movies/#comment-21648450</link><description>Using red/blue tech to advertise polarized tech is pretty stupid and counterproductive to trying to "sell" 3D IMHO.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2009 11:34:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Are You Looking Forward To 3D Movies?</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/are_you_looking_forward_to_3d_movies/#comment-21648444</link><description>@Alex&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thanks for finding that error, I've corrected it.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;@Jim&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Yeah, Bruce should have pointed out the difference between the type of glasses in theaters and the ones they use for TV/DVD. My fault, I should have caught that but it was late and I was getting ready for bed when I edited the post.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Personally, I'm a fan of 3D with the polarized glasses - I think it adds depth to scenes and puts you more "in" the movie.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But, problems:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;- I wear glasses. Royal pain in the ass to have 3D glasses over my regular ones.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;- Home viewing: As long as they keep doing the cheap, crappy red/blue for home viewing, people's perception of 3D will be negative. I tried to watch both Polar Express and Journey to the Center of the Earth in 3D on my 60" HDTV and found them BOTH to be unwatchable.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2009 10:40:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Superbowl Star Trek Trailer = More Adrenaline</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/superbowl_star_trek_trailer_more_adrenaline/#comment-21648419</link><description>@Lord Garth&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Hey, thanks bro - appreciate the props. Sorry, but I don't get any sort of updates from Criterion. I'm sure you can find that on the web somewhere...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Best,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 14:06:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Superbowl Star Trek Trailer = More Adrenaline</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/superbowl_star_trek_trailer_more_adrenaline/#comment-21648417</link><description>@Lord Garth&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Yeah, I never liked Picard's leadership by committee. Like he was incapable of making a decision on his own or just wanted to validate the self-esteem of his bridge crew by asking them for their opinion.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Give me Kirk any day.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 00:23:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Superbowl Star Trek Trailer = More Adrenaline</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/superbowl_star_trek_trailer_more_adrenaline/#comment-21648411</link><description>@Rob&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I think it's difficult to judge the skydiving scene outside of any context.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2009 14:38:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Superbowl Star Trek Trailer = More Adrenaline</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/superbowl_star_trek_trailer_more_adrenaline/#comment-21648387</link><description>The one line that makes me cringe is "Why are you talkin' to me, man."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I hate current colloquialisms in sci-fi movies based in the future.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 01 Feb 2009 15:21:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Finally! Check Out The G.I. Joe Teaser Trailer</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/finally_check_out_the_gi_joe_teaser_trailer/#comment-21648380</link><description>@thandral&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I had the same exact thoughts while watching the trailer.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2009 14:37:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Finally! Check Out The G.I. Joe Teaser Trailer</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/finally_check_out_the_gi_joe_teaser_trailer/#comment-21648363</link><description>I had NO idea what to expect with this... I'm still trying to wrap my head around it and decide what I think about it.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 01 Feb 2009 23:37:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Transformers 2 Teaser Online!</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/transformers_2_teaser_online/#comment-21648349</link><description>Rob,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I deleted Shodan's comment. Reminder to everyone, I will not allow comments that include personal insults, even if the rest of your comment may make good points.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 10:35:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Transformers 2 Teaser Online!</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/transformers_2_teaser_online/#comment-21648337</link><description>Yeah, I heard that. Don't think we'll be covering it here, though.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2009 20:26:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Transformers 2 Teaser Online!</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/transformers_2_teaser_online/#comment-21648329</link><description>@Bill Blume&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Yeah, that whole masturbation joke was SO out of left field that I was left wondering if I really heard it right...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2009 14:37:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Transformers 2 Teaser Online!</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/transformers_2_teaser_online/#comment-21648297</link><description>@darkone&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I'm not a Michael Bay hater, I just didn't like Transformers. At all.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 01 Feb 2009 17:38:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: New &amp;#8216;Public Enemies&amp;#8217; Promo Images</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/new_8216public_enemies8217_promo_images/#comment-21647949</link><description>Hey guys, sorry about any confusion - a number of websites were posting these as brand new.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 11:24:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Will Joe Carnahan Drive &amp;#8216;The A-Team&amp;#8217; To Success?</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/will_joe_carnahan_drive_8216the_a_team8217_to_success/#comment-21647925</link><description>@steven&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;ROFLMAO! :-P&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 18:58:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Discussion &amp;#8211; January 28, 2009</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/open_discussion_8211_january_28_2009/#comment-21647918</link><description>@Ken J&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Before I purchase a Blu-Ray disc I got to &lt;a href="http://Amazon.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;Amazon.com&lt;/a&gt; and read the reviews - that's how I found out about the crappy BD version of the Terminator movies.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And no, the Alien movies AREN'T on DVD yet. I'm waiting eagerly for the first two to be released.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 31 Jan 2009 10:49:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Discussion &amp;#8211; January 28, 2009</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/open_discussion_8211_january_28_2009/#comment-21647912</link><description>@High Caliber&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I hadn't thought of that, good point. However I think that award goes for overall design, which is why "period" movies tend to do well.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 10:56:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Will A Babylon 5 Movie Make It To The Big Screen?</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/will_a_babylon_5_movie_make_it_to_the_big_screen/#comment-21647830</link><description>@Lord Garth&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I'd have to figure out how to get in touch with him. :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 15:30:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: &amp;#8216;The Dark Knight&amp;#8217; IMAX Giveaway &amp;#8211; Winners!</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/8216the_dark_knight8217_imax_giveaway_8211_winners/#comment-21647775</link><description>Hey gang,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I popped the tickets in the mail today - you should have them in a couple of days. :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 17:20:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: &amp;#8216;The Dark Knight&amp;#8217; IMAX Giveaway &amp;#8211; Winners!</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/8216the_dark_knight8217_imax_giveaway_8211_winners/#comment-21647769</link><description>@James&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Sorry, don't know... I received that via email.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2009 09:17:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Stallone Is Made Of Stone!</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/stallone_is_made_of_stone/#comment-21647724</link><description>Those are temporary tattoos for the film.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 11:28:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Stallone Is Made Of Stone!</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/stallone_is_made_of_stone/#comment-21647718</link><description>@SK47&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It's documented that Sly uses HGH, and the use of it would be to help him get that lean at such an advanced age, not to get huge.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2009 11:32:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Stallone Is Made Of Stone!</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/stallone_is_made_of_stone/#comment-21647715</link><description>@Jae Senn&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Indeed. You can't just do steriods and HGH and then go sit on the coach to watch TV and eat potato chips if you want to look like that. :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2009 10:43:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Stallone Is Made Of Stone!</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/stallone_is_made_of_stone/#comment-21647709</link><description>@Jae Senn&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;How old are you? I'm 47 and pretty fit but I can tell you that once you're over 40 it is VERY hard to stay in shape. If I continued to eat and just work out a little as I did when I was 25 I would blow up like Steven Seagal. :-P&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 25 Jan 2009 16:00:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Enterprise vs. Galactica: Who Would Win?</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/enterprise_vs_galactica_who_would_win/#comment-21647655</link><description>@Robin&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I was just ribbing you since you said it was a pointless comparison after you took the time to argue in favor of BSG. :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 25 Jan 2009 15:58:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Will &amp;#8216;The Hurt Locker&amp;#8217; Be Boring?</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/will_8216the_hurt_locker8217_be_boring/#comment-21649234</link><description>@Mandarr&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Can't say I disagree about the "respect" thing - and that'll go over like a ton of bricks here in the U.S.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 20:26:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why Van Damme Turned Down Stallone&amp;#8217;s &amp;#8216;Expendables&amp;#8217;</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/why_van_damme_turned_down_stallone8217s_8216expendables8217/#comment-21649177</link><description>@Mike&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It sounds like Stallone didn't show him the script but wanted him to come onboard sight unseen.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Then again, how about just saying "Hey, can I take a look at the script before I decide?"&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 18:21:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: ABC Is Bringing Back &amp;#8216;V&amp;#8217;</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/abc_is_bringing_back_8216v8217/#comment-21649163</link><description>@INK&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;LOL, wouldn't surprise me at all.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2009 10:45:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: ABC Is Bringing Back &amp;#8216;V&amp;#8217;</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/abc_is_bringing_back_8216v8217/#comment-21649151</link><description>LOL, yeah - that's what made it stand out. :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 23:15:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: ABC Is Bringing Back &amp;#8216;V&amp;#8217;</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/abc_is_bringing_back_8216v8217/#comment-21649145</link><description>The main thing I remember about the series is one scene where a hot babe that was really a lizard tilted her head back and opened her mouth into a huge cavernous maw - and inserted a large rodent, whole.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;:-P&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 18:20:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Alex Proyas&amp;#8217; &amp;#8216;Knowing&amp;#8217; Is More Intense Than You Think</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/alex_proyas8217_8216knowing8217_is_more_intense_than_you_think/#comment-21649137</link><description>I'm looking forward to this and hope that it doesn't stink. I'm not too concerned, Proyas is a good director - even "I, Robot" wasn't THAT awful.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 13:08:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Discussion &amp;#8211; February 11, 2009</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/open_discussion_8211_february_11_2009/#comment-21649120</link><description>@Drew&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Haven't heard anything on either front, sorry. I seriously doubt they'll re-use the Joker in the next Batman film.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 11:14:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Discussion &amp;#8211; February 11, 2009</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/open_discussion_8211_february_11_2009/#comment-21649117</link><description>@Frank Castle&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Hmmm... I just went through and looked at our recent posts.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;So far this month The Dark Knight was mentioned in 5 out of 61 posts. In January TDK was mentioned in 15 out of 161 posts.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;So less than 10% of our posts mention The Dark Knight, and that includes posts that are specifically ABOUT the film. Last month there was a lot of Oscar talk about it plus any talk of Warner Bros. financial situation usually warrants a reference.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thanks, though - I'd never thought about going back through and doing an analysis like that. :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 10:53:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Enterprise vs. Galactica: Who Would Win?</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/enterprise_vs_galactica_who_would_win/#comment-21647642</link><description>@Robin&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If it's so "assinine and pointless" then why bother to go to any trouble to even make your, um, point?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And why wouldn't Trek tech work in the Galactica universe? It's the same universe. Oh, wait... why am I asking you a pointless question...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;8-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 25 Jan 2009 12:16:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Enterprise vs. Galactica: Who Would Win?</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/enterprise_vs_galactica_who_would_win/#comment-21647640</link><description>@Rob&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;LOL, of all people you should know to just shoot me an email if one of your comments doesn't show up. :-P&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 25 Jan 2009 11:53:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Enterprise vs. Galactica: Who Would Win?</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/enterprise_vs_galactica_who_would_win/#comment-21647639</link><description>@greenknight&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Been wondering that myself. I think he probably migrated over the movie site that he writes for.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Bummer. Been missing his comments. But it seems that Ken J has come in to fill the vacuum. :-P&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 25 Jan 2009 11:47:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Jonathan Nolan Responds To &amp;#8216;The Dark Knight&amp;#8217; Oscar Snubs</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/jonathan_nolan_responds_to_8216the_dark_knight8217_oscar_snubs/#comment-21647608</link><description>@Christopher&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;What a GREAT analysis of Oscars in the past vs today!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 24 Jan 2009 18:05:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Detailed Look At Star Trek (Toy) Prop Designs</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/detailed_look_at_star_trek_toy_prop_designs/#comment-21647585</link><description>@David&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Oh man... I had the communicator pic but forgot to add it to the post.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Also, I apologize for the less than stellar image quality - I was using the Mac version of the software I usually use and was not used to it yet, and didn't save the images at a high enough quality level.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 25 Jan 2009 12:25:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Detailed Look At Star Trek (Toy) Prop Designs</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/detailed_look_at_star_trek_toy_prop_designs/#comment-21647573</link><description>@David&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Doh!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;That's what happens when I write late at night. Thanks for pointing out the error!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 24 Jan 2009 13:18:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 2008 Razzie Award Nominees Anounced</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/2008_razzie_award_nominees_anounced/#comment-21647553</link><description>&lt;em&gt;"I think someone would’ve had to see the Spirit to actually nominate it."&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;ROFLAMO!!! :-D&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 25 Jan 2009 15:58:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 2008 Razzie Award Nominees Anounced</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/2008_razzie_award_nominees_anounced/#comment-21647551</link><description>@nowhereman&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Holy cow... good point!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 24 Jan 2009 22:37:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 2008 Razzie Award Nominees Anounced</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/2008_razzie_award_nominees_anounced/#comment-21647549</link><description>@Alex&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Be nice. Everyone is entitled to their opinion, if they're wrong. :-P&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 24 Jan 2009 12:54:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Watchmen Will Trump The Dark Knight In Realism</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/watchmen_will_trump_the_dark_knight_in_realism/#comment-21647540</link><description>@darkbhudda&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Well considering that Watchmen takes place in the 70s (and I think early 80s), you might not get your wish.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2009 22:09:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Watchmen Will Trump The Dark Knight In Realism</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/watchmen_will_trump_the_dark_knight_in_realism/#comment-21647534</link><description>@Gary&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Remember... "realism" is an artistic style depicting subjects as they appear in everyday life while "realistic" is an adjective meaning an accurate representation.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 24 Jan 2009 01:05:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Smallville &amp;#8216;Bulletproof&amp;#8217; Brings The Show Back To Form</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/smallville_8216bulletproof8217_brings_the_show_back_to_form/#comment-21647513</link><description>Of course Lex isn't dead. They can't rewrite comic book history THAT radically on the show.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2009 17:03:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Smallville &amp;#8216;Bulletproof&amp;#8217; Brings The Show Back To Form</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/smallville_8216bulletproof8217_brings_the_show_back_to_form/#comment-21647495</link><description>BTW, funny how a negative review brings out so many more commenters than a positive one. 8-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2009 13:16:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Smallville &amp;#8216;Bulletproof&amp;#8217; Brings The Show Back To Form</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/smallville_8216bulletproof8217_brings_the_show_back_to_form/#comment-21647494</link><description>Thanks for the corrections, guys - I'll fix the post here shortly.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2009 13:09:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 2009 Oscar Nominations &amp;amp; The Dark Knight</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/2009_oscar_nominations_amp_the_dark_knight/#comment-21647468</link><description>And that's why I tend to want to do all the reviews here at Screen Rant myself. 8-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2009 13:09:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 2009 Oscar Nominations &amp;amp; The Dark Knight</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/2009_oscar_nominations_amp_the_dark_knight/#comment-21647451</link><description>@elliot&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If you're following this thread, I deleted your comment. You may disagree but your statement was uncalled for.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;@Steven&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;You have GOT to be kidding. TDK was too complex and it's a darker story than LOTR? I don't think so.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 22:35:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 2009 Oscar Nominations &amp;amp; The Dark Knight</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/2009_oscar_nominations_amp_the_dark_knight/#comment-21647445</link><description>Michael Shannon was not a surprise. People have been talking Oscar for his performance for weeks.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 19:12:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: New Street Fighter Movie Poster Is Fan-Made</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/new_street_fighter_movie_poster_is_fan_made/#comment-21647436</link><description>The poster is staying up. I like it and I've added a disclaimer at the top.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2009 13:09:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: New Street Fighter Movie Poster Is Fan-Made</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/new_street_fighter_movie_poster_is_fan_made/#comment-21647430</link><description>Perhaps you folks could be helpful and provide a link to a site that proves this is a fake.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Post that link here and I'll gladly take down this post.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thanks,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 16:14:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: SR Picks [Collectibles]: Hulkbuster Iron Man Statue</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/sr_picks_collectibles_hulkbuster_iron_man_statue/#comment-21647423</link><description>@arrell&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thanks for the feedback, it's appreciated. Don't worry, it's not like it'll be daily - probably once a week or less.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 23:42:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: SR Picks [Collectibles]: Hulkbuster Iron Man Statue</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/sr_picks_collectibles_hulkbuster_iron_man_statue/#comment-21647420</link><description>LOL, I just wanted you to know it wasn't some screw out of nowhere design. :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 22:33:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: SR Picks [Collectibles]: Hulkbuster Iron Man Statue</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/sr_picks_collectibles_hulkbuster_iron_man_statue/#comment-21647418</link><description>@greenknight&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Actually it's VERY close to a design from the comic book, designed by Adi Granov. I've update the post with a picture so you can see for yourself. :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 20:28:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: SR Picks [Collectibles]: Hulkbuster Iron Man Statue</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/sr_picks_collectibles_hulkbuster_iron_man_statue/#comment-21647415</link><description>Actually we don't make it explicitly clear. We want the option to cover a wide variety of genres, but that's what we drift towards generally.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 19:13:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: SR Picks [Collectibles]: Hulkbuster Iron Man Statue</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/sr_picks_collectibles_hulkbuster_iron_man_statue/#comment-21647413</link><description>LOL, you were just in denial, that's all. :-P&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 18:14:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: SR Picks [Collectibles]: Hulkbuster Iron Man Statue</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/sr_picks_collectibles_hulkbuster_iron_man_statue/#comment-21647411</link><description>Well seeing as:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;1.I'm enough of a movie geek to run an entire site about movies.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;2. We focus on fantasy/sci-fi/superhero movies.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;3. And the fact that I *love* and collect movie related stuff.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I thought it would be of interest to readers as well.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 15:59:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: John August To Write Tim Burton&amp;#8217;s &amp;#8216;Frankenweenie&amp;#8217;</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/john_august_to_write_tim_burton8217s_8216frankenweenie8217/#comment-21647401</link><description>I'm with Aaron. I don't think this will be a short lived gimmick like it's been in that past. Sure, initially movies will be "gimmicky" about its use, but I think as time goes on that aspect will not be as prevalent and it will just add to the movie theater experience.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Now if they can get rid of those damned glasses...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 16:18:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Dakota Fanning To Star In New Moon?</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/dakota_fanning_to_star_in_new_moon/#comment-21647393</link><description>@g&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Um, actors dye their hair for roles all the time.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 10:43:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Dakota Fanning To Star In New Moon?</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/dakota_fanning_to_star_in_new_moon/#comment-21647370</link><description>@Twilighterr&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;There's this really cool stuff called "hair coloring" out there. I think you can even find it in supermarkets!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;:-P&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 13:35:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Lost Season 5 Premiere Offers Many Clues</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/lost_season_5_premiere_offers_many_clues/#comment-21647349</link><description>@Christine&lt;br&gt;Didn't notice the fake leg...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;@soLost&lt;br&gt;Yeah, the problem with this show is you need a photographic memory to remember everything that's happened in order to really "get it."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 25 Jan 2009 11:49:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Lost Season 5 Premiere Offers Many Clues</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/lost_season_5_premiere_offers_many_clues/#comment-21647341</link><description>I agree that we're going to see some looping back to past events and that from this perspective it will make more sense.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Interesting theory on Locke, not sure how that will play out.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I'm actually a huge fan of time travel stories so this has really revived my interest in the series.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 17:40:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Lost Season 5 Premiere Offers Many Clues</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/lost_season_5_premiere_offers_many_clues/#comment-21647336</link><description>Yeah, it's disjointed and hard to follow at times - but now we have enough background that it makes it intriguing.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The more I think about it, the more I think there will be a DVD release of some sort for fans that will instruct us to watch the shows in a different order that'll make the story more linear. :-P&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 10:51:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Warner Bros. To Lay Off 800 Worldwide</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/warner_bros_to_lay_off_800_worldwide/#comment-21647327</link><description>Highly doubtful would be understating it, I'm sure.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 16:36:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Brosnan On &amp;#8216;Thomas Crown Affair 2&amp;#8242;: It&amp;#8217;s Now Or Never</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/brosnan_on_8216thomas_crown_affair_28242_it8217s_now_or_never/#comment-21647321</link><description>True, I think they tread on dangerous ground when revisiting older properties *cough*Indy 5*cough*.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 18:56:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Tarantino Says Full &amp;#8216;Kill Bill&amp;#8217; Movie Is Still Coming</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/tarantino_says_full_8216kill_bill8217_movie_is_still_coming/#comment-21647312</link><description>@Sebastian&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thanks for pointing that out, I've added a reference to Empire.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;@Sean&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;EXCELLENT point!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 15:51:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Marvel Studios: Screwing Up Or Being Sensible?</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/marvel_studios_screwing_up_or_being_sensible/#comment-21647305</link><description>@DarkGritty&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Sorry, I disagree. Lots of movies with unknown actors make boatloads of money and lots of movies with big name stars bomb big time.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 13:09:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Marvel Studios: Screwing Up Or Being Sensible?</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/marvel_studios_screwing_up_or_being_sensible/#comment-21647298</link><description>@Daniel F&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I think your point is valid when an actor being in a film influences someone to go who might not otherwise - and a LOT of people are swayed that way.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 10:53:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Marvel Studios: Screwing Up Or Being Sensible?</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/marvel_studios_screwing_up_or_being_sensible/#comment-21647291</link><description>@Darren&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Great comment. Notice I did not say *financial* disappointments. You do have a point, though - the fans can be too close to the source material and blind to the fact that you have to make adjustments when going from the comic book page to the big screen with live actors.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;As far as Spidey 3, sure, the anticipation played into it. But in cases like that a second viewing, after all the hype is out of the way often tells the true story. The problem with the Venom story arc was that it was shoehorned into the plot and it was obvious even to the casual viewer.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I actually think that for TRULY faithful book to screen adaptations that would still look right on the big screen you'd have to do it via CGI animation.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 21:12:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Marvel Studios: Screwing Up Or Being Sensible?</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/marvel_studios_screwing_up_or_being_sensible/#comment-21647281</link><description>@SK47&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Sure, but we'll never know, will we. :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It takes a lot more than just kids and teens to get a movie to that $$ level.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 17:17:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Marvel Studios: Screwing Up Or Being Sensible?</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/marvel_studios_screwing_up_or_being_sensible/#comment-21647278</link><description>@SK47&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Well.... see there's the flip side. I think RDJ *did* help put butts in seats. People love to see an underdog come back and that's what he did big time with Iron Man.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 15:54:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Discussion &amp;#8211; January 21, 2009</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/open_discussion_8211_january_21_2009/#comment-21647268</link><description>I just wrote a full post on the Marvel vs. actor salaries thing.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Check the home page.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 13:35:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Discussion &amp;#8211; January 21, 2009</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/open_discussion_8211_january_21_2009/#comment-21647257</link><description>@Joe&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;No worries - I "scrubbed" it. :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Don't think I've seen you around here before, welcome to the site! You'll find we're big Iron Man fans around here.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 10:19:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A Jericho Movie? Don&amp;#8217;t Hold Your Breath</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/a_jericho_movie_don8217t_hold_your_breath/#comment-21647238</link><description>@791&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Just wondering... what's a "backwarded town?"&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 17:20:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A Jericho Movie? Don&amp;#8217;t Hold Your Breath</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/a_jericho_movie_don8217t_hold_your_breath/#comment-21647210</link><description>Uh, gang... the author of this article is a fan of the show and he's seen every episode.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2009 20:01:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Watchmen Goes Viral</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/watchmen_goes_viral/#comment-21647202</link><description>Really I think viral marketing helps opening weekend box office for movies - beyond that the film has to stand on its own merits.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2009 14:29:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: J.K. Simmons Talks Spider-Man 4</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/jk_simmons_talks_spider_man_4/#comment-21647165</link><description>LOL, nah... it's just funny that movie came up because I finally watched just a couple of days ago. :-P&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I probably had it coming from huntthejest since he went and saw PWZ on my recommendation and he hated it. 8-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2009 18:38:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: J.K. Simmons Talks Spider-Man 4</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/jk_simmons_talks_spider_man_4/#comment-21647161</link><description>@huntthejest&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Wow, so I must not bright enough to "get" the Coen brothers comedy, because I freaking HATED "Burn After Reading." I thought it plain sucked.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I'm sorry but I need a character in a movie I can relate to as a viewer, and the closest thing to that in the film was J.K. Simmons. And Brad Pitt would have been perfect for the part he played... 20 years ago.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And BTW I am a fan of their films, I loved "Fargo" and "Brother Where Art Thou."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2009 17:40:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Three New Spots For &amp;#8216;Push&amp;#8217;</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/three_new_spots_for_8216push8217/#comment-21647147</link><description>@Vid&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;That's a good comparison - but for me the main thing that killed Jumper was Hayden Christensen. Hopefully this will turn out better.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2009 19:05:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Tons Of New &amp;#8216;Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince&amp;#8217; Images</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/tons_of_new_8216harry_potter_and_the_half_blood_prince8217_images/#comment-21647135</link><description>@Dan&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Ah... see, now THAT'S what I thought (I haven't ready any of the books after the first one). It seems really strange that this film will drop to a PG.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Maybe it's due to what I call "ratings creep," where the edge of each rating level keeps getting pushed further over time.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2009 17:04:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Michael Bay Makes Fun Of Terminator Salvation</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/michael_bay_makes_fun_of_terminator_salvation/#comment-21645887</link><description>I'm terrible at predicting box office but my guess would be that you're right, Rob. Transformers 2 will make boatloads more money than Terminator 4.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 01:19:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: SR&amp;#8217;s Inaugural Weekly TV Wrap Up</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/sr8217s_inaugural_weekly_tv_wrap_up/#comment-21645774</link><description>Unfortunately I have to say that Stargate: Atlantis went out on a very weak note IMHO. Final two episodes seemed TOTALLY thrown together at the last minute to close the TV series. Very abrupt and "Deus Ex Machina" feeling to them.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I'm disappointed.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2009 01:20:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Spider-Man 4 Villain Is A Vampire?</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/spider_man_4_villain_is_a_vampire/#comment-21645743</link><description>@Bill Blume&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Excellent point. Avi Arad made Raimi shoehorn Venom into the film and it totally felt like that was the case.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2009 10:32:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Watchmen Producer Speaks Out About Lawsuit</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/watchmen_producer_speaks_out_about_lawsuit/#comment-21645683</link><description>@greenknight&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If you've been waiting for the movie for 20 years then you may very well be disappointed due to your expectations.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Then again, I'd been waiting my whole life for an Iron Man movie and that sucker lived up to mine just fine. :-P&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2009 12:15:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Enhanced Look At The Transformers 2 Poster</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/enhanced_look_at_the_transformers_2_poster/#comment-21645645</link><description>@SHODAN&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;You're pushing it.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 10:47:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Enhanced Look At The Transformers 2 Poster</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/enhanced_look_at_the_transformers_2_poster/#comment-21645632</link><description>@Ken J&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;LOL, actually I *could* have enhanced it that much but I thought it would take too much away from the look of the actual poster, which was the point of the post - to show the poster.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2009 12:14:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Enhanced Look At The Transformers 2 Poster</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/enhanced_look_at_the_transformers_2_poster/#comment-21645627</link><description>@Strider&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I guess the humor of "thanks to my very basic Photoshop skills" was lost on you.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Chill out, why don't you?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Yeesh.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 17:53:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Gran Torino Review</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/gran_torino_review/#comment-21645596</link><description>@Stella&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Nice eye for detail, I totally missed that.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2009 11:20:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Gran Torino Review</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/gran_torino_review/#comment-21645575</link><description>@ogb&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Here you go:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://screenrant.com/clint-eastwood-man-figuratively-literally-vic-4839/" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://screenrant.com/clint-eastwood-man-figura...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;:-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2009 23:26:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Gran Torino Review</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/gran_torino_review/#comment-21645559</link><description>@Ogb&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;LOL, as I said, it's MY review and what I thought of it. :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Actually I'm pretty sensitive to bad acting and I didn't get that at all from the film.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 18:19:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Gran Torino Review</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/gran_torino_review/#comment-21645557</link><description>@greenknight&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;What Ken said. :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;*I* couldn't find anything wrong with it and I enjoyed it without reservation, hence the score. Don't know if it'll be the same for you.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 18:00:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Gran Torino Review</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/gran_torino_review/#comment-21645552</link><description>@sito&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;That was based on the reaction to a couple of other reviews I've written that turned out to be controversial (although I certainly didn't think they were).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 15:42:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Stallone To Do Another &amp;#8216;Rambo&amp;#8217;?</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/stallone_to_do_another_8216rambo8217/#comment-21648218</link><description>Rambo vs. Alien vs. Predator vs. Terminator vs. Batman vs. Robocop.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;8-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 18:29:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: &amp;#8216;Batman 3&amp;#8242; Currently Being Scripted!</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/8216batman_38242_currently_being_scripted/#comment-21648202</link><description>@David B&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I can't speak to the Courier Post, but that seems odd as it certainly looks like a mainstream press site. But I *can* tell you that I trust sites like &lt;a href="http://IESB.net" rel="nofollow"&gt;IESB.net&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href="http://LatinoReview.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;LatinoReview.com&lt;/a&gt;. They have sources within the studios and tend to "scoop" the trades by weeks, if not months.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 16:09:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Taken Review</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/taken_review/#comment-21648176</link><description>@Darren&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Don't get me wrong, I loved this movie. But having Neeson repeatedly taking out rooms full of young bad guys who you'd think could defend themselves pretty well was just a bit over the top.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Then again I suppose you could say he had the element of surprise on his side. :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I've seen it twice now and I loved it both times. To me this is a repeater, like the Die Hard movies.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 01 Feb 2009 00:11:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Taken Review</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/taken_review/#comment-21648170</link><description>"Taken" has a bunch of great quotes.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;"It's only a flesh wound."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;"I told you I'd find you."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;"It's personal to me."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;:-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 22:54:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Mid-Week Movie News Wrap Up &amp;#8211; Jan. 29, 2009</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/mid_week_movie_news_wrap_up_8211_jan_29_2009/#comment-21648102</link><description>Doh! Niall included an item that we covered in a separate post and I forgot to re-number the list. :-P&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 10:57:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Very Cool Black &amp;amp; White &amp;#8216;Watchmen&amp;#8217; Portraits</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/very_cool_black_amp_white_8216watchmen8217_portraits/#comment-21648090</link><description>Preacher movie:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://screenrant.com/preacher-movie-worksagain-rob-4098/" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://screenrant.com/preacher-movie-worksagain...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 23:11:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: It&amp;#8217;s Official: &amp;#8216;The Thing&amp;#8217; Prequel Is Coming</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/it8217s_official_8216the_thing8217_prequel_is_coming/#comment-21648069</link><description>@charles darwin&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Sounds to me like a prequel of John Carpenter's version but a remake of the original 1951 film.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 17:31:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: It&amp;#8217;s Official: &amp;#8216;The Thing&amp;#8217; Prequel Is Coming</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/it8217s_official_8216the_thing8217_prequel_is_coming/#comment-21648066</link><description>I'm hoping that this turns out to be a decent remake of the original film. Really, John Carpenter's version wasn't strictly a remake as it took the story in a bit of a different direction. This one sounds more like it's a re-do of the original.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I hope they do a decent job of it.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 16:42:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Oh No&amp;#8230; Ghost Rider 2 Is Coming &amp;#8211; With Nicolas Cage</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/oh_no8230_ghost_rider_2_is_coming_8211_with_nicolas_cage/#comment-21648022</link><description>Ah, I see your confusion - I thought Niall wrote this, sorry!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Rob wrote this, the author's name is at the top of every post. :-P&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 18:11:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Oh No&amp;#8230; Ghost Rider 2 Is Coming &amp;#8211; With Nicolas Cage</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/oh_no8230_ghost_rider_2_is_coming_8211_with_nicolas_cage/#comment-21648012</link><description>Niall isn't saying that the concept of Ghost Rider is bad, he's talking about (as you agree) the lack of quality of the film. And the likely hood that another one will probably be just as bad.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 15:00:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Weekly TV Wrap Up &amp;#8211; January 29, 2009</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/weekly_tv_wrap_up_8211_january_29_2009/#comment-21647975</link><description>@wes&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;You'd be surprised at how many U.S. shows (mainly sitcoms) have been based on British shows over the years.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 21:33:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Gran Torino Review</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/gran_torino_review/#comment-21645551</link><description>@SK47&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;"substance over style"&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Damn, why didn't I think to use that in my review? :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 15:39:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Gran Torino Review</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/gran_torino_review/#comment-21645546</link><description>@Ogb&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Really? I thought the supporting cast did a decent job. I do appreciate you sharing your thoughts.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 13:04:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Gran Torino Review</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/gran_torino_review/#comment-21645543</link><description>@Jess H&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Gah! Thanks for finding that typo. That's what I get for writing a review at 11:30 at night after a full day.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 10:39:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Taylor Lautner Is &amp;#8216;In&amp;#8217; For &amp;#8216;New Moon&amp;#8217;</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/taylor_lautner_is_8216in8217_for_8216new_moon8217/#comment-21645520</link><description>That wasn't really Lautner - that's why I deleted the comment. :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 22 Feb 2009 14:47:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Good And Bad Watchmen News</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/good_and_bad_watchmen_news/#comment-21645441</link><description>@chimp&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Can't really argue with you. :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 16:06:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Good And Bad Watchmen News</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/good_and_bad_watchmen_news/#comment-21645439</link><description>@Psyko&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Uh, what? I just read the comments and I didn't see any "snide and sarcastic" remarks directed at you. Just Oscar saying "it's not Fox's fault," which I don't agree with completely, BTW.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 13:07:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Smallville To Power On To A 9th Season</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/smallville_to_power_on_to_a_9th_season/#comment-21645419</link><description>@redroeder&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I've deleted your comments and my response. If you can't express your opinion without insulting people, then go find another site on which to leave your acerbic comments.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Have a nice day.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 01 Feb 2009 14:56:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: And The Villain In Iron Man 2 Is&amp;#8230;</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/and_the_villain_in_iron_man_2_is8230/#comment-21645391</link><description>One of the two source sites (Variety and Hollywood Reporter) have their details wrong. If it's a Russian character named Ivan who is Tony Stark's (I'm sure they meant "Iron Man's") counterpart - that's Crimson Dynamo.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I'm not saying Whiplash WON'T be in the film, I just think people are combining the two into one and that's just wrong.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 00:35:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Because We NEED Another Remake: Sorority Row</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/because_we_need_another_remake_sorority_row/#comment-21645371</link><description>@nick2060&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If I'm wrong, I stand corrected. I was told by someone I assumed was in the know that this would be PG-13.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I'll do some research on it - thanks for pointing it out.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 23:46:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Because We NEED Another Remake: Sorority Row</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/because_we_need_another_remake_sorority_row/#comment-21645368</link><description>@Stella&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Oh hell yeah, I remember that movie. It was one of my favorite schlock horror films. That ending.... brrrr!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 18:59:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: &amp;#8216;Outlander&amp;#8217; Movie: Exclusive New Image &amp;amp; Release News</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/8216outlander8217_movie_exclusive_new_image_amp_release_news/#comment-21645354</link><description>@JBREX&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;No idea, bud.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 23:48:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: &amp;#8216;Outlander&amp;#8217; Movie: Exclusive New Image &amp;amp; Release News</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/8216outlander8217_movie_exclusive_new_image_amp_release_news/#comment-21645351</link><description>@Larry&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I believe it's still playing in theaters overseas? Also, I was just informed it may open in additional cities not mentioned in the list above.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 18:58:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: &amp;#8216;Outlander&amp;#8217; Movie: Exclusive New Image &amp;amp; Release News</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/8216outlander8217_movie_exclusive_new_image_amp_release_news/#comment-21645348</link><description>@Larry Rocha&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Yup, it's true. My typing isn't up to speed, though. :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 18:11:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: &amp;#8216;Outlander&amp;#8217; Movie: Exclusive New Image &amp;amp; Release News</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/8216outlander8217_movie_exclusive_new_image_amp_release_news/#comment-21645347</link><description>@Ray O&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Well it's a very "niche" movie - hard to get a distribution deal sometimes. Look at all the great movies at Sundance that never make it to theaters.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 18:08:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: First Official U.S. &amp;#8216;Street Fighter&amp;#8217; Trailer = Weak</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/first_official_us_8216street_fighter8217_trailer_weak/#comment-21645326</link><description>After watching the trailer, I thought that if they had different music and dumped the voiceover it would have been MUCH better.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;That's not to say the movie will be good... just that the trailer wouldn't have seemed as bad.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 14:01:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Discussion &amp;#8211; January 7, 2009</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/open_discussion_8211_january_7_2009/#comment-21645310</link><description>@INK&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Yeah, pretty stupid gambling with a couple hundred million dollars...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 16:04:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Discussion &amp;#8211; January 7, 2009</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/open_discussion_8211_january_7_2009/#comment-21645308</link><description>@Larry Rocha&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thanks, same to you.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;As to the whole Watchmen mess, Warner Bros. is not completely without fault here - with their army of lawyers I do not believe they weren't aware of Fox's claim or the legality of it. While I think that Fox is acting like a schmuck studio (sitting on the property for 20 years and then getting pissy when another studio makes what looks like an amazing film), I think WB knew this was coming and gambled that they could pay off Fox minimally and not have it affect the release date.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 13:21:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Discussion &amp;#8211; January 7, 2009</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/open_discussion_8211_january_7_2009/#comment-21645305</link><description>@Alex&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Here's my top five list of movies I'm looking forward to this year:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;1. Star Trek&lt;br&gt;2. Watchmen&lt;br&gt;3. Avatar&lt;br&gt;4. Terminator Salvation&lt;br&gt;5. X-Men Origins: Wolverine&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Everything below that is nothing I'm terribly excited about.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Unless some new big superhero/sci-fi movie is announced later this year I don't know what I'm going to cover besides Avatar come June. :-P&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 10:36:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Fight Like A &amp;#8216;Ninja Assassin&amp;#8217;</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/fight_like_a_8216ninja_assassin8217/#comment-21645292</link><description>Looks like my gym workout. Sorta. :-P&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 01:31:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A Rant On &amp;#8216;The Descent: Part 2&amp;#8242; (Plus First Images)</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/a_rant_on_8216the_descent_part_28242_plus_first_images/#comment-21645284</link><description>@JMoney&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;You can plus /Film - they're friends of mine. :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 10:57:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: &amp;#8216;Jonah Hex&amp;#8217; Gets New Director</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/8216jonah_hex8217_gets_new_director/#comment-21645227</link><description>@brightblack&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thanks for the insight, bud. It's much appreciated.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;You never know... look at the job Jon Favreau did with Iron Man!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 01:35:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: &amp;#8216;Jonah Hex&amp;#8217; Gets New Director</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/8216jonah_hex8217_gets_new_director/#comment-21645222</link><description>@Ross&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Yeah, I saw the trailer and I couldn't believe it - vilest crap I've seen in a LONG time. Seriously.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 18:38:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: &amp;#8216;Jonah Hex&amp;#8217; Gets New Director</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/8216jonah_hex8217_gets_new_director/#comment-21645219</link><description>While I enjoyed Crank as a fun romp, the unrated trailer for Crank 2 is heinous - I have NO desire to see it.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 17:09:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Powers Of &amp;#8216;Push&amp;#8217;</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/the_powers_of_8216push8217/#comment-21645205</link><description>There is a six issue comic book mini-series coming out that serves as a prequel to the movie that gives a lot of background as well.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 10:27:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: &amp;#8216;Stargate: Atlantis&amp;#8217; Is Coming To A Close</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/8216stargate_atlantis8217_is_coming_to_a_close/#comment-21645194</link><description>While Amanda Tapping was wasted, I *hated* the seeing Higginson on the show. HATED her character. I was ecstatic to see her leave regardless of who replaced her.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I'm incredibly annoyed they're ending the series as it just found it's "groove" recently. As to this episode? I was thinking "WTF?" In my opinion it was:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;1. A total rip-off of CSI shows.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;2. Annoying that they went so graphic with it - we watch it as a family and my daughter was not able to watch the next-to-last episode of the entire series.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;3. A *very* cheap "short-cut" way to end the series abruptly. Lame Deus Ex Machina  IMHO.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I can't imagine them wrapping this all up in a one hour episode. This show deserves a better ending.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 00:15:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: R.I.P. 2008: A Rough Year For Hollywood</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/rip_2008_a_rough_year_for_hollywood/#comment-21645141</link><description>@Tim&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Oh my gosh! How did I forget her? Thanks for the reminder, I've added her to the post.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 15:04:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Sandra Bullock NOT In Stallone&amp;#8217;s &amp;#8216;The Expendables&amp;#8217;</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/sandra_bullock_not_in_stallone8217s_8216the_expendables8217/#comment-21645114</link><description>@Ken J&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Before you respond to to aGeneral let me just nip this right in the bud: The comments section here is NOT about ragging on actors, especially when it has NOTHING to do with the topic of the post.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 23:36:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Weekend Movie News Wrap Up: January 4, 2009</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/weekend_movie_news_wrap_up_january_4_2009/#comment-21644993</link><description>@Gary&lt;br&gt;The Dr. Blake addition is right at the very end of the film from what I've read, so your worries may be unjustified.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 04 Jan 2009 20:15:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Matt Smith Is The New Doctor Who</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/matt_smith_is_the_new_doctor_who/#comment-21644912</link><description>To everyone:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I am getting very, very close to shutting down comments on this post. I don't like it when things get out of hand and personal - I don't do it often but I just did it on another post and if people don't ease up I'll shut this one down as well.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic Holtreman, Owner and Editor-in-Chief of this site.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 16:21:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Matt Smith Is The New Doctor Who</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/matt_smith_is_the_new_doctor_who/#comment-21644889</link><description>@Bradley De La Cloche&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;"Bollocks." I love that word... Don't ask me why. :-P&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 13:29:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Matt Smith Is The New Doctor Who</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/matt_smith_is_the_new_doctor_who/#comment-21644873</link><description>On that note...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Folks, I realize this is a topic you're passionate about - but it IS possible to discuss and disagree without getting nasty. I've been monitoring this thread and it's on the hairy edge of my stepping in and actively moderating it.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Disagree, but be civil about it.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 19:03:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Matt Smith Is The New Doctor Who</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/matt_smith_is_the_new_doctor_who/#comment-21644830</link><description>Hey, why doesn't everyone give this guy 3 or 4 episodes and THEN debate his merits or lack thereof? :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 10:25:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Matt Smith Is The New Doctor Who</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/matt_smith_is_the_new_doctor_who/#comment-21644805</link><description>@Joshi&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I don't know why some comments get "flagged" but I do continually check the spam area for valid ones that get caught.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 04 Jan 2009 16:58:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: More Toy-Based Movies On The Way</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/more_toy_based_movies_on_the_way/#comment-21644748</link><description>Now, now... don't be dissing "Jaws"! :-P&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 03 Jan 2009 19:49:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Clint Eastwood Is The Man &amp;#8211; Figuratively And Literally</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/clint_eastwood_is_the_man_8211_figuratively_and_literally/#comment-21644736</link><description>@Michael&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Hypocrisy? Really? I was referring to the anonymity of the internet, and if you look at the top of the page you'll see I provide my full name instead of some "handle" like "moviedude."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;"and know that fighting isn’t always the right answer. If you can’t evolve then you’ll just fizzle out."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Funny how you reference evolution but don't seem to have a grasp of "survival of the fittest." You're right, sometimes you don't have to fight - but quite often you do. Try being a woman and reasoning with a rapist or reasoning with the guy who breaks into your home in the middle of the night.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I will give you props however for using your real name and an actual email address to post your comment.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 13:41:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Clint Eastwood Is The Man &amp;#8211; Figuratively And Literally</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/clint_eastwood_is_the_man_8211_figuratively_and_literally/#comment-21644719</link><description>@Daniel F&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Kirk is far superior to Picard.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;8-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 04 Jan 2009 16:59:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Clint Eastwood Is The Man &amp;#8211; Figuratively And Literally</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/clint_eastwood_is_the_man_8211_figuratively_and_literally/#comment-21644717</link><description>@Cali&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Being the author of this post you'll know where I'm coming from, but beyond the age of 2 or so I don't see the need to hit children to punish them. There are other methods, and IMHO if you start from day one with discipline and consistency it should never come to that.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I've been blessed with a great daughter but very early on she had the same meltdowns as other kids. We never layed a hand on her, but used other disciplinary methods - and she's one of the best behaved kids I know.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 04 Jan 2009 12:43:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Clint Eastwood Is The Man &amp;#8211; Figuratively And Literally</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/clint_eastwood_is_the_man_8211_figuratively_and_literally/#comment-21644716</link><description>@The Big Dentist&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Indeed! Could you believe that on TNG? A friggin' "counseler" on the bridge? The other thing that drove me nuts about that show (and I'm a huge Trek fan) was Picard's decision by committee "leadership" style. Give me Kirk any day. :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 04 Jan 2009 12:40:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Clint Eastwood Is The Man &amp;#8211; Figuratively And Literally</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/clint_eastwood_is_the_man_8211_figuratively_and_literally/#comment-21644708</link><description>@andrew&lt;br&gt;Right. Try "critical thinking" when you're about to get your ass kicked by a bully after school.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I can attest to the fact that not laying down for a bully works - happened to me in grammar school. Dude twice my size (I was pretty much a pencil-neck back then) would pick on me all the damned time. Finally I hauled off and kicked him in the balls as hard as I could.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Dude NEVER bothered me again after that.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;All this ADD and ADHD and obesity is a disease B.S. make me crazy. Boys are more hyper than girls, and maybe if you cut back on the TV, video games, sugar and generally crappy diets most of the behavior/attention span problems would go away.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 03 Jan 2009 16:57:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Spirit Review</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/the_spirit_review/#comment-21644664</link><description>@D-E-D-P-O-O-L&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I understand exactly what you're saying, I just don't believe Millar succeeded at doing what you say he was aiming for. Not even close.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 16:41:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Spirit Review</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/the_spirit_review/#comment-21644630</link><description>Hey gang,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If that troll continues to comment here I'm going to ask you a favor:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Please ignore him and do not respond.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;While I appreciate your support, it only gives encouragement. The best way to deal with it is to ignore it. I would actually be thankful if he used his real email address so I could contact him and try to find out what the issue is, but I can't do that. So again, please do NOT respond.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thanks,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 13:16:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Spirit Review</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/the_spirit_review/#comment-21644622</link><description>@BlackDingo&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thanks, bud - I really do try to differentiate Screen Rant from all the other movie sites out there.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 00:38:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Spirit Review</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/the_spirit_review/#comment-21644620</link><description>@Rob&lt;br&gt;I hate banning people and I don't do it lightly - but when it's obvious that the only purpose someone has is to be a troll and post flamebait, I won't put up with it.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 23:35:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Spirit Review</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/the_spirit_review/#comment-21644608</link><description>Ken,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I appreciate your coming to my defense but lets not stoke the flame, shall we? 8-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 10:22:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Spirit Review</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/the_spirit_review/#comment-21644602</link><description>Hey "haha"&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Listen, dumbass - if you want me to take you seriously, why don't you be a man and use a real email address instead of the B.S. one you use to comment?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Feel free to comment here, if they are in the same vein as those before, I'll delete them as fast as I find them.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;On the other hand, contribute to the discussion in an intelligent, non-insulting manner and those will stay - even if they disagree with me.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 04 Jan 2009 23:17:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Spirit Review</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/the_spirit_review/#comment-21644594</link><description>@Gary&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Kofi is going to be writing up a Valkyrie review.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 04 Jan 2009 12:36:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Spirit Review</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/the_spirit_review/#comment-21644592</link><description>@Ken J&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Dude, I typed in "Timeline review" in the search box here and it was the top result. :-P&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But since I like you, here ya go:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://screenrant.com/review-timeline-vic-134/" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://screenrant.com/review-timeline-vic-134/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 04 Jan 2009 12:35:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Spirit Review</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/the_spirit_review/#comment-21644578</link><description>Actually, Kel, I gave AVP:R the same as I gave this movie and "Timeline" had the honor of getting 0/5. 8-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 04 Jan 2009 01:35:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Is Tim Robbins Howard Stark In Iron Man 2?</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/is_tim_robbins_howard_stark_in_iron_man_2/#comment-21643232</link><description>@greenknight &amp;amp; Ken J&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;OK, listen guys - you both need to throttle back. NEITHER of you is going to convince the other of anything so just agree to disagree and from here on out I would avoid talking about non-movie topics because:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;A. It gets a bit heated.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;B. It turns other people off.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I'm a Conservative and my sister is a Liberal and we get along great... there are just certain topics we know to avoid.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Either that or I'm going to start moderating more strictly.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Best regards,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 20 Dec 2008 10:52:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Is Tim Robbins Howard Stark In Iron Man 2?</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/is_tim_robbins_howard_stark_in_iron_man_2/#comment-21643219</link><description>@greenknight&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;LOL, of course it is - only problem is that you have to get the guy who's attacking you to see that point of view. 8-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2008 13:51:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Is Tim Robbins Howard Stark In Iron Man 2?</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/is_tim_robbins_howard_stark_in_iron_man_2/#comment-21643207</link><description>@Oscar&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;No problem, bud. :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;@Ken J&lt;br&gt;LOL, can you dial it back just a TINY bit? 8-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 17:09:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Is Tim Robbins Howard Stark In Iron Man 2?</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/is_tim_robbins_howard_stark_in_iron_man_2/#comment-21643203</link><description>Ah, ok - I see what you're referring to. But he wasn't insulting you or anyone here on the site. I kind of see your point but my issue is with commenters attacking each other, it's not about insulting actors (although I don't agree with that either).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 15:57:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Is Tim Robbins Howard Stark In Iron Man 2?</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/is_tim_robbins_howard_stark_in_iron_man_2/#comment-21643201</link><description>@Oscar!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Rationalize away, but "I don't like the guy" is different from "you sound like a moron."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;As far as I can tell (and feel free to correct me) Ken J didn't insult anyone directly in his comments.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 15:46:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Is Tim Robbins Howard Stark In Iron Man 2?</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/is_tim_robbins_howard_stark_in_iron_man_2/#comment-21643198</link><description>I don't dislike Robbins enough to avoid his movies, as I do with Sean Penn. I just can't get past his off camera publicity. I don't like the guy and I can't watch him in a movie - Oscar contender or not.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 15:14:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Maggie Q Cast In Video Game Adaptation &amp;#8216;King Of Fighters&amp;#8217;</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/maggie_q_cast_in_video_game_adaptation_8216king_of_fighters8217/#comment-21643186</link><description>@Oscar!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Putting a smiley at the end of a statement where you basically call someone a moron does not make it ok.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 15:13:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: California Drones Mystery Solved By Sarah Connor Chronicles?</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/california_drones_mystery_solved_by_sarah_connor_chronicles/#comment-21643098</link><description>@phoenix&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thanks for the link. Would have been nice if he dropped a comment here.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2008 21:46:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Outlander Finally Gets A U.S. Theatrical Release Date</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/outlander_finally_gets_a_us_theatrical_release_date/#comment-21643044</link><description>Hey Aaron, you want a more realistic approach in a movie where Vikings fight an alien invasion?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;:-P&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 15:27:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Discussion &amp;#8211; December 17, 2008</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/open_discussion_8211_december_17_2008/#comment-21643034</link><description>@Ken J&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I don't recall precisely (saw the original once a LONG time ago), but isn't that basically what the book and the original are about? The excesses of the wealthy?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 19:01:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Discussion &amp;#8211; December 17, 2008</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/open_discussion_8211_december_17_2008/#comment-21643030</link><description>@green&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Yeah, we have a post coming up shortly.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 12:24:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Discussion &amp;#8211; December 17, 2008</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/open_discussion_8211_december_17_2008/#comment-21643028</link><description>@huntthejest&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Nolan has created an alternate universe version of Batman, if you will - and say what you like, his take on Batman and his world has worked VERY well. I give him props for having the integrity to stick to his vision.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It's the non-fantastic take on his films that have made them so popular IMHO.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 11:46:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Tons Of New &amp;#8216;Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince&amp;#8217; Images</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/tons_of_new_8216harry_potter_and_the_half_blood_prince8217_images/#comment-21647132</link><description>@Judy&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thanks for pointing out the book this film is based on is lighter than the previous two. I wasn't aware of that... I kind of figured they just got progressively darker.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2009 15:27:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Details Of The Watchmen Lawsuit Settlement</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/details_of_the_watchmen_lawsuit_settlement/#comment-21647124</link><description>@Kane&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;That's what Fox claims, yes. I never heard whether that was verified or not.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2009 09:15:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Details Of The Watchmen Lawsuit Settlement</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/details_of_the_watchmen_lawsuit_settlement/#comment-21647119</link><description>Hey Kane, are you on Twitter? You'll probably get a kick out of this:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.twitter.com/foxmovies" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.twitter.com/foxmovies&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;8-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2009 20:34:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Details Of The Watchmen Lawsuit Settlement</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/details_of_the_watchmen_lawsuit_settlement/#comment-21647116</link><description>@Metallicat&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;While it was a big ugly fight, I wouldn't call it a waste of time, effort and money since WB ends up with the lion's share of the profits but Fox still gets some coin for doing nothing.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2009 19:06:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Details Of The Watchmen Lawsuit Settlement</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/details_of_the_watchmen_lawsuit_settlement/#comment-21647112</link><description>@The Glove&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;That's a great point that's been brought up before. Can you imagine if after all this the movie ends up doing mediocre box office?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Although I tend to doubt that, myself.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2009 11:19:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Details Of The Watchmen Lawsuit Settlement</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/details_of_the_watchmen_lawsuit_settlement/#comment-21647110</link><description>@Ken J&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I'm pretty sure that's the plan.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;@Kane&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Sure, no slam on you intended and I agree. I actually said essentially that back in September:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://screenrant.com/watchmen-movie-delay-fox-studio-fault-vic-3576/" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://screenrant.com/watchmen-movie-delay-fox-...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2009 00:38:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Details Of The Watchmen Lawsuit Settlement</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/details_of_the_watchmen_lawsuit_settlement/#comment-21647107</link><description>This has been complicated for sure - but I think you're missing the "real estate agent" from your analogy (Larry Gordon). That's the guy with authority that you trusted who SEEMED to have the title to the property,  but it turns out he didn't.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 18 Jan 2009 23:50:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Lost Season 5 Will (Supposedly) Give Us Answers</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/lost_season_5_will_supposedly_give_us_answers/#comment-21647098</link><description>Not too many Lost fans here, I take it?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2009 15:38:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Weekend Movie News Wrap Up: January 18, 2009</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/weekend_movie_news_wrap_up_january_18_2009/#comment-21647088</link><description>@Tiny&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;You can't blame Netfilx if the film isn't out on DVD yet. I believe it will be released on March 10th, not that far away. :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 18 Jan 2009 15:19:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Weekend Movie News Wrap Up: January 18, 2009</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/weekend_movie_news_wrap_up_january_18_2009/#comment-21647087</link><description>@dave&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;That's the one news item that jumped out at me as well. I'm sure Asimov is rolling over in his grave.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 18 Jan 2009 15:17:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Hugh Jackman Speaks Out About Wolverine Reshoots</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/hugh_jackman_speaks_out_about_wolverine_reshoots/#comment-21647072</link><description>@Darren&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I think it's more of a case that most people think that Fox is going to screw it up - not that people WANT a Wolverine movie to fail. I know that everyone here at Screen Rant would love for it to turn out to be awesome.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And who knows? Maybe these "reshoots" will end up helping the film and in the end make it better. Is it a case of wrapping duct tape around a tailpipe on a clunker or is it instead them putting another coat of candy apple red clearcoat on a killer car?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 18 Jan 2009 22:41:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Wolverine Reshoots = More Trouble?</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/wolverine_reshoots_more_trouble/#comment-21647049</link><description>@Niall&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thanks for clearing that up. I find it interesting that Jackman (who I hear is a REALLY nice guy) is so popular yet the non-Wolverine movies he appears in don't seem to reflect that.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2009 15:37:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Wolverine Reshoots = More Trouble?</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/wolverine_reshoots_more_trouble/#comment-21647046</link><description>@Zipper&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Yeah, I thought that was a bit over the top... probably should have snipped that line out before publishing the post.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2009 14:23:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Wolverine Reshoots = More Trouble?</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/wolverine_reshoots_more_trouble/#comment-21647039</link><description>@JessSayin&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The production has been plagued with problems including meddling by Fox head Tom Rothman, so it's not much of a leap to say that reshoots are a bad sign.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Although of course you may be right - we don't have mutant powers of prophecy here at Screen Rant. :-P&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 18 Jan 2009 10:24:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: There&amp;#8217;s Life In The Thing</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/there8217s_life_in_the_thing/#comment-21647020</link><description>If they're telling it from the Norwegian POV than that makes it a prequel that would actually be closer to the plot of the original 1950s version.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 18 Jan 2009 14:19:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Battlestar Galactica Premiere, Earth And The Final Cylon</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/battlestar_galactica_premiere_earth_and_the_final_cylon/#comment-21646983</link><description>So does that mean all of us commenting here are really... Cylons? 8-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 18 Jan 2009 22:36:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Smallville &amp;#8216;Legion&amp;#8217; Mid-Season Return = Weak</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/smallville_8216legion8217_mid_season_return_weak/#comment-21646912</link><description>lol @huntthejest. :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2009 11:21:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Smallville &amp;#8216;Legion&amp;#8217; Mid-Season Return = Weak</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/smallville_8216legion8217_mid_season_return_weak/#comment-21646891</link><description>@Aaron&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Not a big fan of free speech, are we?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I like the show - I want it to be great. Another example: I'm a HUGE Star Trek fan, probably for longer than you've been alive and I bagged on Star Trek: Enterprise big time because it was AWFUL.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;A true fan doesn't just swallow what is handed to them but exhorts the producers to make the best show possible. Accept crap and that's what you'll continue to get.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Of course considering the general lack of discernment among TV fans I'm not surprised some people are fawning all over this while great shows like Jericho and Journeyman get CANCELLED.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2009 20:59:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Smallville &amp;#8216;Legion&amp;#8217; Mid-Season Return = Weak</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/smallville_8216legion8217_mid_season_return_weak/#comment-21646885</link><description>@scott&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Did I say I hated Smallville? I like the show and I want it to be GOOD. Even good shows sometimes put out lousy episodes, or actually "jump the shark" and should quite while they're ahead.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Search the site and read my other posts about how I thought this season was much better than the last.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2009 14:07:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: New Trailer For &amp;#8216;Fast &amp;amp; Furious&amp;#8217; Disappointing</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/new_trailer_for_8216fast_amp_furious8217_disappointing/#comment-21646827</link><description>@Dave&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I'm not a fan of the films. At all.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2009 19:08:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Who Is &amp;#8216;The Last Cylon&amp;#8217; On Battlestar Galactica?</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/who_is_8216the_last_cylon8217_on_battlestar_galactica/#comment-21646683</link><description>You're confusing it with the final episode of ST:Enterprise where Troi and Riker did a look-back on the crew of that show, but no, the entire series was not a holodeck simulation.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2008 11:12:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Who Is &amp;#8216;The Last Cylon&amp;#8217; On Battlestar Galactica?</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/who_is_8216the_last_cylon8217_on_battlestar_galactica/#comment-21646679</link><description>Uh, no, that's not how ST:TNG ended - fans would have stormed the Paramount gates had it ended that way, lol.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Although I sometimes wonder if Lost will end like that...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2008 09:49:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Who Is &amp;#8216;The Last Cylon&amp;#8217; On Battlestar Galactica?</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/who_is_8216the_last_cylon8217_on_battlestar_galactica/#comment-21646672</link><description>Yeah, when Six turned up pregnant my first thought was "WTF?" How does one Cylon impregnate another?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 15 Jun 2008 13:58:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Who Is &amp;#8216;The Last Cylon&amp;#8217; On Battlestar Galactica?</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/who_is_8216the_last_cylon8217_on_battlestar_galactica/#comment-21646667</link><description>Uh, sorry dude, but the show is NOT coming back in July. It's returning in 2009. Perhaps you confused the Stargate Atlantis commercial with BSG. :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 15 Jun 2008 00:14:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Who Is &amp;#8216;The Last Cylon&amp;#8217; On Battlestar Galactica?</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/who_is_8216the_last_cylon8217_on_battlestar_galactica/#comment-21646590</link><description>Dunno, bud. Never watch it online.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2008 22:02:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Who Is &amp;#8216;The Last Cylon&amp;#8217; On Battlestar Galactica?</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/who_is_8216the_last_cylon8217_on_battlestar_galactica/#comment-21646415</link><description>Dude, what a GREAT "out there" theory! Wouldn't it be a trip if you were right. That would be a head-spinner of a twist on which to end the series.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 00:56:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Discussion &amp;#8211; January 14, 2009</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/open_discussion_8211_january_14_2009/#comment-21646292</link><description>@Ken J&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I have no idea - there's nothing you need to do on this side.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2009 10:21:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Jackie Chan IS Mr. Miyagi: Please, No&amp;#8230;</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/jackie_chan_is_mr_miyagi_please_no8230/#comment-21646243</link><description>@Joshi/SK47&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Why a remake? To cash in on the name recognition of the original, that's why.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 13:14:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: MTV Confirms: &amp;#8216;Terminator: Salvation&amp;#8217; Rocks</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/mtv_confirms_8216terminator_salvation8217_rocks/#comment-21646211</link><description>@Rob&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Actually the rating does (also) have to do with language and nudity. If I recall correctly movie bloggers were pretty annoyed over Slumdog Millionare getting an R despite the fact that (according to them, I haven't seen it) the content didn't warrant an R rating.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I don't know of any film that has been given an R solely on the basis of its content and theme - with no f-bombs or nudity in it.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 13:16:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: MTV Confirms: &amp;#8216;Terminator: Salvation&amp;#8217; Rocks</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/mtv_confirms_8216terminator_salvation8217_rocks/#comment-21646209</link><description>@Doom&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;He said in the interview they weren't aiming for a PG-13, that's just the rating the MPAA gave them.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Me, I don't miss f-bombs just for the sake of having them, but what bothers me is violent movies that are "cleaned up" by omitting the bloodshed that should appear. Drives me NUTS to see bloodless movies that have hundreds of shots being fired.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 10:52:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: MTV Confirms: &amp;#8216;Terminator: Salvation&amp;#8217; Rocks</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/mtv_confirms_8216terminator_salvation8217_rocks/#comment-21646204</link><description>@charles darwin&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;LOL, ah... and you'd been behaving yourself so well lately. :-P&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Every movie blogger I've talked to about the footage thinks it looks pretty damned good, and while you are right, that much footage looking good certainly improves the odds, just as horrible footage indicates an awful movie (The Spirit).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 21:56:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: MTV Confirms: &amp;#8216;Terminator: Salvation&amp;#8217; Rocks</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/mtv_confirms_8216terminator_salvation8217_rocks/#comment-21646203</link><description>@Brian&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Please note that *I* was not the author of this post. :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 21:53:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Which Movie Trailers Will Air During The Super Bowl?</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/which_movie_trailers_will_air_during_the_super_bowl/#comment-21646173</link><description>Generally brand new trailers premiere during the Super Bowl. It's very expensive so studios don't want to show stuff that's already been seen.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 23:43:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Which Movie Trailers Will Air During The Super Bowl?</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/which_movie_trailers_will_air_during_the_super_bowl/#comment-21646165</link><description>I Tivo the Superbowl, fast forward through the game and watch the commercials only. :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 17:15:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Will Michael Rosenbaum Return To Smallville?</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/will_michael_rosenbaum_return_to_smallville/#comment-21646141</link><description>Hey! What's the problem with shaving your head?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;:-P&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 17:15:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Love Screen Rant? Vote For Us!</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/love_screen_rant_vote_for_us/#comment-21646135</link><description>Thanks, guys... I really appreciate the kind words. :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 23:42:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Love Screen Rant? Vote For Us!</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/love_screen_rant_vote_for_us/#comment-21646125</link><description>@Ash Ali&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;LOL, that's ok bro, it won't bruise my ego. Just happy to be there among friends. BTW, /Film gets about 5X the visitors we do and their videocast is VERY popular.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Now if we could at least pass Twitchfilm... :-P&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 15:55:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Love Screen Rant? Vote For Us!</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/love_screen_rant_vote_for_us/#comment-21646117</link><description>@Gary&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Slashfilm is run by a good friend of mine and it gets a TON more visitors than we do. It's more of a news site and less of an editorial one, although they do comment on news items.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Come on guys, get the word out - we're looking sad in the votes! :-P&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 13:55:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: &amp;#8216;24&amp;#8242; Season 7 Discussion</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/8216248242_season_7_discussion/#comment-21645978</link><description>@Sylar's Hunger&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Well now that the spoilers are out of the way, eh? :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 10:32:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: &amp;#8216;24&amp;#8242; Season 7 Discussion</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/8216248242_season_7_discussion/#comment-21645976</link><description>Yeah baby, this series is back. Man, I've missed it!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 00:28:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: James Bond 007: A Cinematic Legacy &amp;#8211; Part 2 of 2</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/james_bond_007_a_cinematic_legacy_8211_part_2_of_2/#comment-21645955</link><description>@Bal&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I'm sure there will be another film - Daniel Craig has stated that he would like the next one to be "lighter." Bring on the martinis, Q and Moneypenny.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I know I'm ready for their return.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 01:18:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Michael Bay Makes Fun Of Terminator Salvation</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/michael_bay_makes_fun_of_terminator_salvation/#comment-21645909</link><description>@Adam&lt;br&gt;Sorry, I will continue to hate the humor. I get the PG-13 thing, but honestly, that whole masturbation bit felt like a "joke grenade" tossed into the movie - it just didn't fit.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2009 22:58:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Michael Bay Makes Fun Of Terminator Salvation</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/michael_bay_makes_fun_of_terminator_salvation/#comment-21645907</link><description>@Bill Blume&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I'm with you. That reference in the film was totally uncalled for in a movie that parents would be bringing under 10 year olds to. I mean seriously, give me a freaking break. I *hated* that scene (among many other things in the film).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2009 15:32:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Discussion &amp;#8211; December 17, 2008</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/open_discussion_8211_december_17_2008/#comment-21643025</link><description>I've been going round and round on this issue with them. To their credit, even though it's taking a long time they ARE working with me on this issue.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 10:24:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Discussion &amp;#8211; December 17, 2008</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/open_discussion_8211_december_17_2008/#comment-21643017</link><description>Hey gang, since "regulars" tend to read these weekly discussion posts I thought I'd give you a heads up on contests that are on the way:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;- Casablanca Ultimate Edition DVD&lt;br&gt;- Death Race&lt;br&gt;- Traitor (starring Don Cheadle)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 15:19:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Discussion &amp;#8211; December 17, 2008</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/open_discussion_8211_december_17_2008/#comment-21643013</link><description>@LandGrizzle&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Nolan doesn't want Superman in his movies because in his established Batman universe super-powered beings don't exist.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 14:17:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: &amp;#8216;Lost&amp;#8217; Season 5 Premiere Sneak Peeks</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/8216lost8217_season_5_premiere_sneak_peeks/#comment-21643002</link><description>What's bugged me about the show (beyond the ultra-slow pace of the story) has been the fact that they seem to be trying to play both side of the sci-fi/supernatural fence. IMHO you need to pick ONE as the explanation behind everything.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Most everything seems to have pretty much a sci-fi angle... except for the smoke "creature."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 23:23:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Two New Pics From &amp;#8216;Inglourious Basterds&amp;#8217;</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/two_new_pics_from_8216inglourious_basterds8217/#comment-21642972</link><description>@90caliber&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;You beat me to it! I freaking HATED Death Proof.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Hated. It.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 00:49:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: New G.I. Joe Movie Character Posters</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/new_gi_joe_movie_character_posters/#comment-21642932</link><description>Well WE didn't trash the Wolverine footage from Comic-Con. This is what I had to say about that footage back in July:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;em&gt;"They showed an extended trailer for the film which I have to say was pretty damned awesome and the crowd went nuts... The buzz on this has been that it’s not going to be good but you certainly couldn’t tell that from the trailer that was shown."&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://screenrant.com/comiccon-08-fox-panel-vic-3071/" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://screenrant.com/comiccon-08-fox-panel-vic...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 15:32:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: IMDB&amp;#8217;s Top 25 Most Searched Movies of 2008</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/imdb8217s_top_25_most_searched_movies_of_2008/#comment-21642924</link><description>"Those aren't the movies you're looking for."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;"Those aren't the movies we're looking for."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;"Move along."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;"Move along."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;8-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 10:26:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: IMDB&amp;#8217;s Top 25 Most Searched Movies of 2008</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/imdb8217s_top_25_most_searched_movies_of_2008/#comment-21642921</link><description>@Kahless&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;What's your point?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 17:51:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: &amp;#8216;Sarah Connor Chronicles&amp;#8217; Mid-Season Discussion</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/8216sarah_connor_chronicles8217_mid_season_discussion/#comment-21642912</link><description>@Seige&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Is it because the T1000s can simulate flesh and blood? I mean they interact with people even with touch so they can't seem like they're made of plastic. They're in human form when they come back in time.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 10:24:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: &amp;#8216;Sarah Connor Chronicles&amp;#8217; Mid-Season Discussion</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/8216sarah_connor_chronicles8217_mid_season_discussion/#comment-21642906</link><description>@Rich&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I actually thought the pilot episode was awful, gave it about one more and then quit. After that I kept hearing how great it was so I had to go back and watch it on &lt;a href="http://Hulu.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;Hulu.com&lt;/a&gt; to catch up.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Glad I did!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 15:53:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: &amp;#8216;Sarah Connor Chronicles&amp;#8217; Mid-Season Discussion</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/8216sarah_connor_chronicles8217_mid_season_discussion/#comment-21642903</link><description>@bobby&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;My first thought was the same about the ship, but how would it have traveled back through time? Organic matter, remember?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It must have been built present day, maybe by that creepy pale redheaded Terminatrix?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 10:30:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: &amp;#8216;Sarah Connor Chronicles&amp;#8217; Mid-Season Discussion</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/8216sarah_connor_chronicles8217_mid_season_discussion/#comment-21642897</link><description>@JMoney&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I said I enjoyed watching the DEVELOPMENT of the John Connor character. When did you stop watching the show? He's matured quite a bit since the start of season one.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 20:52:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: &amp;#8216;Heroes: Villains&amp;#8217; Is Over &amp;#8211; What Did You Think?</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/8216heroes_villains8217_is_over_8211_what_did_you_think/#comment-21642886</link><description>@SYC&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Yeah... I'm sorry Lotta but it seems to me you're just looking for something racial where nothing exists. In season one Jessica did online videocam porn for crying out loud.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 28 Dec 2008 18:43:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: &amp;#8216;Heroes: Villains&amp;#8217; Is Over &amp;#8211; What Did You Think?</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/8216heroes_villains8217_is_over_8211_what_did_you_think/#comment-21642856</link><description>@Mark&lt;br&gt;I think Sylar will be back. I love  how they keep NOT finishing the job with killing him. Chop his friggin' head off and bury it a mile from his body if you don't want him coming back. :-P&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;@Oscar&lt;br&gt;I didn't post anything that didn't appear at the end of the "Villains" finale. :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;@Carl Lee&lt;br&gt;See my first point regarding Sylar... Why doesn't someone light a match to the @#$#$%ing formula? Yeesh.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 14:15:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: AFI 2008 Top 10 List Has A Surprise</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/afi_2008_top_10_list_has_a_surprise/#comment-21642848</link><description>@Ken J&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thanks, bud... it's appreciated!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 15:15:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: AFI 2008 Top 10 List Has A Surprise</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/afi_2008_top_10_list_has_a_surprise/#comment-21642845</link><description>Don't get TOO tired of lists - it's the end of the year so we'll probably be putting out a couple of "listy" posts ourselves. :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 10:29:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: AFI 2008 Top 10 List Has A Surprise</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/afi_2008_top_10_list_has_a_surprise/#comment-21642827</link><description>@greenknight&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Oh, what I'm happy about is that it turned out so great, not that it's making it onto any end of year lists. :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Actually while it has a high percentage at RT, the average rating is 7.6/10 which is very good, but not outstanding.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 11:33:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: AFI 2008 Top 10 List Has A Surprise</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/afi_2008_top_10_list_has_a_surprise/#comment-21642823</link><description>It's a surprise because I would accept more "high brow" films to be on the list, not a crowd pleaser like Iron Man.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 10:57:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: New Moon Rushing To New Release Date</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/new_moon_rushing_to_new_release_date/#comment-21642813</link><description>Stop pretending to be Taylor Lautner or I'll toss you off the site.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 16:18:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: New Moon Rushing To New Release Date</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/new_moon_rushing_to_new_release_date/#comment-21642801</link><description>@INK&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;LOL, I didn't see it until this morning - it's gone.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 10:28:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Robert Carlyle Joins &amp;#8216;Stargate: Universe&amp;#8217;</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/robert_carlyle_joins_8216stargate_universe8217/#comment-21642779</link><description>Please don't be Star Trek: Voyager, please don't be Star Trek: Voyager, please don't be Star Trek: Voyager...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 23:25:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Stephen Norrington To Resurrect &amp;#8216;The Crow?&amp;#8217;</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/stephen_norrington_to_resurrect_8216the_crow8217/#comment-21642759</link><description>"League" was so awful that it's the movie that poisoned Alan Moore (Watchmen author) against movie versions of graphic novels.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 10:16:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Nolan Returning To Batman And Bringing Catwoman?</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/nolan_returning_to_batman_and_bringing_catwoman/#comment-21642745</link><description>@Jody&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I own and run the site.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;We don't really keep track but we feel like we get to know the folks who come back day after day.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2009 15:59:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Nolan Returning To Batman And Bringing Catwoman?</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/nolan_returning_to_batman_and_bringing_catwoman/#comment-21642743</link><description>LOL, I hated Catwoman. Thanks for the compliment and I appreciate your enthusiasm. :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Always nice to have another passionate movie fan on the site!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2009 10:41:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Nolan Returning To Batman And Bringing Catwoman?</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/nolan_returning_to_batman_and_bringing_catwoman/#comment-21642734</link><description>The Murphy/Labouf rumours are total B.S. Harry Knowles at AICN went on a major rant about all the Batman 3 rumors.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The only reason I posted this Weisz rumor is because Jett over at Batman-on-Film posted it, and he's pretty hooked into what's going on with the Bat-films.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 10:25:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Nolan Returning To Batman And Bringing Catwoman?</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/nolan_returning_to_batman_and_bringing_catwoman/#comment-21642700</link><description>@MonkeyFan&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thanks for the background. Actually the reason I posted this up is because Batman-on-Film gave it some credibility and those guys are to Batman movies what &lt;a href="http://TrekMovie.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;TrekMovie.com&lt;/a&gt; is to Star Trek: plugged in to what is going on.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;As far as the whole Julie Newmar recommended Jolie thing, I do believe we did post something up on that a while back.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 23:44:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Nolan Returning To Batman And Bringing Catwoman?</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/nolan_returning_to_batman_and_bringing_catwoman/#comment-21642696</link><description>@Charles Darwin&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;As far as I can recall there is a history of sexual tension between Batman and Catwoman in the comic book versions of the characters.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 21:09:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Nolan Returning To Batman And Bringing Catwoman?</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/nolan_returning_to_batman_and_bringing_catwoman/#comment-21642684</link><description>And that poster is fan-made.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 17:50:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: X-Men Origins: Wolverine Trailer Is Here!</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/x_men_origins_wolverine_trailer_is_here/#comment-21642655</link><description>I'm here to help. :-P&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 21:15:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: X-Men Origins: Wolverine Trailer Is Here!</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/x_men_origins_wolverine_trailer_is_here/#comment-21642653</link><description>@prtfvr&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;LOL, you're not invisible... we acknowledge you! :-P&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 20:25:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: X-Men Origins: Wolverine Trailer Is Here!</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/x_men_origins_wolverine_trailer_is_here/#comment-21642651</link><description>@ S.Matt&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I actually liked the fangs on Sabretooth. More subtle than huge.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 20:11:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: X-Men Origins: Wolverine Trailer Is Here!</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/x_men_origins_wolverine_trailer_is_here/#comment-21642644</link><description>@Smitty&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I see not problem also, now that you mention it.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;:-P&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 17:51:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: X-Men Origins: Wolverine Trailer Is Here!</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/x_men_origins_wolverine_trailer_is_here/#comment-21642628</link><description>@Adrian&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I don't think we're going to get a red band trailer for a PG-13 movie. The only time I've EVER seen that happen was with Beowulf, and that didn't make any sense.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 13:49:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: X-Men Origins: Wolverine Trailer Is Here!</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/x_men_origins_wolverine_trailer_is_here/#comment-21642625</link><description>Hey gang, I updated the post with 40 screen grabs from the trailer. :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 13:30:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: New Moon Has A Director</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/new_moon_has_a_director/#comment-21642620</link><description>LOL, jo Hale welcome our site. :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 14:45:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Weekend Movie News Wrap Up: December 14, 2008</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/weekend_movie_news_wrap_up_december_14_2008/#comment-21642608</link><description>Guys there really is nothing substantial out there on the next film - it's all just smoke and mirrors at this point... Nolan isn't interested in jumping right back into the next one just yet.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 10:31:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: &amp;#8216;The Day The Earth Stood Still&amp;#8217; DVD Winners!</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/8216the_day_the_earth_stood_still8217_dvd_winners/#comment-21642588</link><description>Sorry for the delay - crazy Christmas stuff going on. DVDs for ALL our recent contests went out in batch a couple of days ago. :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2008 12:50:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: &amp;#8216;The Day The Earth Stood Still&amp;#8217; DVD Winners!</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/8216the_day_the_earth_stood_still8217_dvd_winners/#comment-21642583</link><description>@John&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Did you enter? Gotta be in it to win it as they say. :-P&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 13 Dec 2008 13:30:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: &amp;#8216;The Day The Earth Stood Still&amp;#8217; DVD Winners!</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/8216the_day_the_earth_stood_still8217_dvd_winners/#comment-21642581</link><description>Winners announced above, and one of them left a comment on this post. :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Congrats!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Another contest is right around the corner!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 13 Dec 2008 00:52:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: &amp;#8216;The Day The Earth Stood Still&amp;#8217; DVD Winners!</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/8216the_day_the_earth_stood_still8217_dvd_winners/#comment-21642570</link><description>If any of you regular SR readers are interested in this I *highly* recommend that you enter. 8-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 09 Dec 2008 21:42:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: &amp;#8216;The Day The Earth Stood Still&amp;#8217; DVD Winners!</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/8216the_day_the_earth_stood_still8217_dvd_winners/#comment-21642567</link><description>@John&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It's going to make a hell of a lot more than $15MM opening weekend, but the following weekend it will drop like a rock.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 09 Dec 2008 14:58:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Have You Seen The Wolverine Trailer? What Do You Think?</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/have_you_seen_the_wolverine_trailer_what_do_you_think/#comment-21642557</link><description>@Rob&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I don't want spoilers in a trailer, but it's nice to have a sense of what the movie is ABOUT. People say the trailer to "Seven Pounds" is confusing, but it gives you the gist: Man commits some terrible act in the past and is attempting to repent for his actions by bestowing a gift upon someone worthy.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 14 Dec 2008 16:40:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Have You Seen The Wolverine Trailer? What Do You Think?</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/have_you_seen_the_wolverine_trailer_what_do_you_think/#comment-21642541</link><description>@MBL&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;That was such a great breakdown of the trailer I hope you don't mind but I added it to the post above! :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thanks,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 13 Dec 2008 11:04:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Star Trek To Be Digitally Re-Mastered For IMAX</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/star_trek_to_be_digitally_re_mastered_for_imax/#comment-21642520</link><description>@Lank&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;In regards to digital re-mastering, I've seen the special features on a couple of classic films and it's amazing what they can do to enhance/restore what is there, in effect adding detail that wasn't there.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 13 Dec 2008 11:00:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Star Trek To Be Digitally Re-Mastered For IMAX</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/star_trek_to_be_digitally_re_mastered_for_imax/#comment-21642517</link><description>@Jon&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I have to drive an hour to get to an IMAX but I don't hesitate. :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2008 23:08:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: New Star Trek Movie Takes Place In Alternate Timeline</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/new_star_trek_movie_takes_place_in_alternate_timeline/#comment-21642503</link><description>@bob orci&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And I *do* appreciate your taking the time to drop comments here. :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 10:22:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: New Star Trek Movie Takes Place In Alternate Timeline</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/new_star_trek_movie_takes_place_in_alternate_timeline/#comment-21642490</link><description>@bob orci&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I *love* time travel stories, but they make my head hurt. :-) I do believe they've been overused a bit in Trek over the years, but I can understand its use as a device in the new movie.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;@professorj&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I agree with you about the nitpicking of "canon." I'm a HUGE Star Trek fan going all the way back to TOS but I'm not going to get bent out of shape if the crew of the Enterprise sees Romulans before the episode "Balance of Terror" takes place and all that.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;As long as this film is faithful to the spirit of the original and the characters and doesn't get too goofy with the humor (PLEASE tell me the "swollen Kirk" scene is as bad as it gets!) then I'll be satisfied.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 11:06:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: New Star Trek Movie Takes Place In Alternate Timeline</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/new_star_trek_movie_takes_place_in_alternate_timeline/#comment-21642485</link><description>@bob orci&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;First, (if it is in fact you) welcome to the site!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Based on your conversation over at TrekMovie, I would think that one goes back in time to the same timeline but making a change puts you in an alternate one - thus when you return you're going back to a different future than the one you left.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;This, as opposed to arriving at an alternate timeline when you first go back. Therefor I would think that the crew in STIV would never have returned to the Earth where the oceans were being vaporized and THAT Earth would have been destroyed - with the crew saving an alternate Earth instead.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Assuming that one DOES apply the alternate timeline theory to that film. :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 14 Dec 2008 22:12:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Mid-Week Movie News Wrap Up &amp;#8211; Dec. 11, 2008</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/mid_week_movie_news_wrap_up_8211_dec_11_2008/#comment-21642262</link><description>@hunter/zeus (yes, I know you're the same person)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Nowhere in the post above was Keanu "bashed" so I don't know what the heck you're talking about.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2008 17:54:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Transformers 2 Trailer: Not Until February</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/transformers_2_trailer_not_until_february/#comment-21642231</link><description>@Charles&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I only gave Tranformers 2.5/5 when I reviewed it:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://screenrant.com/review-transformers-vic-791/" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://screenrant.com/review-transformers-vic-791/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2008 21:06:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Transformers 2 Trailer: Not Until February</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/transformers_2_trailer_not_until_february/#comment-21642218</link><description>&lt;em&gt;This post does not reflect the general views or opinions of Screen Rant, its other writers nor its subsidiaries.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;8-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2008 14:24:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: New &amp;#8216;Dragonball Evolution&amp;#8217; Trailer Worse Than The Last One</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/new_8216dragonball_evolution8217_trailer_worse_than_the_last_one/#comment-21642155</link><description>Um, fans can't make a movie "suck." They can not show up and make it have lousy box office, but a movie sucks or is great all on its own.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I'm not a fanboy and that looks like total crap to me. Like an early 1970s kung fu flick with bad dubbing.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2008 16:39:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: New &amp;#8216;Dragonball Evolution&amp;#8217; Trailer Worse Than The Last One</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/new_8216dragonball_evolution8217_trailer_worse_than_the_last_one/#comment-21642150</link><description>@kaypain&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;You bring up a good point about international box office. There've been U.S. made films that have only been profitable due to overseas box office. The Golden Compass, for example.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2008 09:30:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: New &amp;#8216;Dragonball Evolution&amp;#8217; Trailer Worse Than The Last One</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/new_8216dragonball_evolution8217_trailer_worse_than_the_last_one/#comment-21642127</link><description>@INK&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Actually it was a response to Oscar - and a general statement about my approach to things here on the site.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2008 13:22:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: New &amp;#8216;Dragonball Evolution&amp;#8217; Trailer Worse Than The Last One</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/new_8216dragonball_evolution8217_trailer_worse_than_the_last_one/#comment-21642125</link><description>If I think a movie is dumb I'm going to say so. If someone likes that particular movie they can draw their own conclusions, but I'll be damned if I'm not going criticize something for fear offending those who like it.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And when the counter-arguments come in the form of "you suck!" or "you're an idiot" or "shut the f* up!" then what do YOU think that says, hmm?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I am an enemy of political correctness and the fear of offending anyone at all costs.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2008 13:10:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: New &amp;#8216;Dragonball Evolution&amp;#8217; Trailer Worse Than The Last One</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/new_8216dragonball_evolution8217_trailer_worse_than_the_last_one/#comment-21642121</link><description>@Oscar&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Calling a trailer that is obviously horrible by any measurement "dumb" is no reflection on fans of Dragonball. What if "Iron Man" had been bloody awful and we dogpiled on it here? Would that be calling fans of the Iron Man comic book "dumb?" Of course not.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;On the other hand I'm not into being politically correct. If someone thinks that an obviously crappy movie is "freakin' AWESOME" well... I'll let that speak for itself (*cough* AVP:R *cough*). 8-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2008 12:38:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: New &amp;#8216;Dragonball Evolution&amp;#8217; Trailer Worse Than The Last One</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/new_8216dragonball_evolution8217_trailer_worse_than_the_last_one/#comment-21642109</link><description>@greenknight&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Yes, I did delete that ONE comment.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2008 11:41:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: New &amp;#8216;Dragonball Evolution&amp;#8217; Trailer Worse Than The Last One</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/new_8216dragonball_evolution8217_trailer_worse_than_the_last_one/#comment-21642095</link><description>Geez, what is it with Dragonball as a topic? It's worse than Twilight when it comes to generating heated discussions...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;First off, I know NOTHING about Dragonball - Z, Evolution or otherwise but I *do* know when a trailer makes me cringe. As a standalone trailer for a movie, I was barely able to sit through one minute and 50 seconds of it. I hope for the sake of the fans that the movie is better than what is shown above.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Second: Chill the heck out. If you can't debate without attacking each other I'll shut this thread down. And that goes for BOTH sides. Behave yourselves.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2008 10:28:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: For Your Consideration: Robert Downey Jr. In Iron Man</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/for_your_consideration_robert_downey_jr_in_iron_man/#comment-21642008</link><description>@Gary&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I loved "Iron Man" but NO ONE in that film deserves an Oscar nomination.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2008 12:04:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Discussion &amp;#8211; December 10, 2008</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/open_discussion_8211_december_10_2008/#comment-21641980</link><description>@790&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I don't know if I'll get an invite for a pre-screening. But to make you feel better, my Day the Earth Stood Still review is about an hour away. :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2008 22:54:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Spirit Review</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/the_spirit_review/#comment-21644567</link><description>@High Kalibur&lt;br&gt;What a GREAT question!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I'd have to say no great loss at all.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Here's the list of films they've distributed:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.imdb.com/company/co0173285/" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.imdb.com/company/co0173285/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The only really good movies that I can see on the list are Akeelah and the Bee from 2006 and Rambo from last January. Oh, and the most excellent Fido along with Midnight Meat Train - both movies essentially buried by them in 100 theater releases.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Short version: No great loss, indeed.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 03 Jan 2009 17:18:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Spirit Review</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/the_spirit_review/#comment-21644564</link><description>@Daniel F&lt;br&gt;Nice to know we agree on at least some things. :-P&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 03 Jan 2009 16:49:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Spirit Review</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/the_spirit_review/#comment-21644556</link><description>Hey gang, thanks for jumping to my defense against this bonehead, but no need - I've banned him from the site.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 03 Jan 2009 14:46:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Spirit Review</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/the_spirit_review/#comment-21644548</link><description>@Gary&lt;br&gt;A "romantic comedy?" Ha. Ha ha. HAHAHAHA!!!!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;To everyone else, if you liked "Sin City" and want to see my thoughts on it as compared to this, you'll see that I'm not throwing out the baby with the bathwater. I gave "Sin City" 3.5/5:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://screenrant.com/review-sin-city-vic-308/" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://screenrant.com/review-sin-city-vic-308/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 03 Jan 2009 11:19:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Spirit Review</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/the_spirit_review/#comment-21644524</link><description>@790&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;"Lipstick on a pig."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 03 Jan 2009 00:08:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Spirit Review</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/the_spirit_review/#comment-21644521</link><description>@Ken J&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I've never seen "Battlefield Earth" so I can't say. Based on what I've heard about it though I'd say that at least on an artistic level this has merits that put it above that movie.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And I didn't hate this as much as I did "Death Proof." 8-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I will tell you though, that if I didn't plan on writing a review I would have walked out of this movie pretty early on.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 02 Jan 2009 23:58:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Spirit Review</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/the_spirit_review/#comment-21644515</link><description>@790&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Yeah, now that you mention it it did seem a pretty "hard" PG-13... but that's what I expect these days. PG-13 is pretty much R without the blood or explicit sex scenes - you can still imply sex or show nudity.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 02 Jan 2009 23:38:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: End Of Year Discussion &amp;#8211; December 31, 2008</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/end_of_year_discussion_8211_december_31_2008/#comment-21644443</link><description>@RoseMarie&lt;br&gt;One can only suspend disbelief so far - and the context of the movie determines just how far that is. In a superhero movie rules are established that make things "believable" within the context of the universe we are watching.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But in the Indiana Jones series, there has never been anything "superhero-ish" about Dr. Jones. Sure, there's been magic involved in very specific ways, but MOST of it is pretty much real world/reality based.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;So to see him survive a nuclear explosion by climbing into a refrigerator and then have that fridge launched miles into the air and land as if dropped from an airplane - only to have him walk away... is WAY beyond my limits of suspension of disbelief. :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 03 Jan 2009 19:53:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: End Of Year Discussion &amp;#8211; December 31, 2008</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/end_of_year_discussion_8211_december_31_2008/#comment-21644434</link><description>My review is up.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If another studio EVER gives Miller the reins to a movie they are stupid. It's that clear.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;He wrote AND directed this thing - at least Shyamalan started out making great movies and then went downhill. But this... Good Lord.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 02 Jan 2009 23:18:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: End Of Year Discussion &amp;#8211; December 31, 2008</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/end_of_year_discussion_8211_december_31_2008/#comment-21644429</link><description>@RoseMarie&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Please don't listen to 790... getting ready to write my review. It SUCKED.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;@790&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;See, the thing about camp... is it's actually supposed to be FUNNY.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 02 Jan 2009 22:02:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: End Of Year Discussion &amp;#8211; December 31, 2008</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/end_of_year_discussion_8211_december_31_2008/#comment-21644422</link><description>FYI, because you guys asked for it, I'm about to subject myself to "The Spirit" in order to write up a review for you.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I hope you're happy! :-P&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 02 Jan 2009 18:57:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: End Of Year Discussion &amp;#8211; December 31, 2008</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/end_of_year_discussion_8211_december_31_2008/#comment-21644401</link><description>@Jac&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;First off, no need to be a freaking bonehead and call anyone "idiots." Especially when most people think TDK was a great movie.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And putting Speed Racer and Eagle Eye on your top movies of '08 doesn't exactly make YOU look like a genius.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;So dial back the rhetoric if you want to comment here again or you're going to find your ass banned.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2009 19:55:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: End Of Year Discussion &amp;#8211; December 31, 2008</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/end_of_year_discussion_8211_december_31_2008/#comment-21644392</link><description>@taylor&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;What you loved about QoS I absolutely despised. I HATED the opera house action sequence (along with the opening car chase) because I COULD NOT TELL WHAT THE HELL WAS HAPPENING.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The abrupt, random quick-cut method of editing is infuriating and I will contine to rail against it.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Look at the opening sequence in Casino Royale - sure, it had some quick cuts... but it was linear, following the flow of the action. QoS did random cuts to make things seem "faster" but it just made the action incomprehensible.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2009 04:31:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: End Of Year Discussion &amp;#8211; December 31, 2008</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/end_of_year_discussion_8211_december_31_2008/#comment-21644391</link><description>@Syler etc.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Ben Stein... leftist? Are you kidding?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2009 04:14:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: End Of Year Discussion &amp;#8211; December 31, 2008</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/end_of_year_discussion_8211_december_31_2008/#comment-21644374</link><description>@Metallicat&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;LMAO! That pic is a testament to the fact that I just don't have many pictures taken. I had to crop an old one even to get THAT. But yeah, I think you're right - maybe I'll "vogue" in my next one. :-P&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2008 18:38:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: End Of Year Discussion &amp;#8211; December 31, 2008</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/end_of_year_discussion_8211_december_31_2008/#comment-21644363</link><description>@Metallicat&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;No doubt there was a lot of hype and frenzy directed at TDK, but I believe that even if he hadn't died, Ledger's performance was totally Oscar-worthy.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2008 16:00:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: End Of Year Discussion &amp;#8211; December 31, 2008</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/end_of_year_discussion_8211_december_31_2008/#comment-21644356</link><description>Hey RoseMarie,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thanks so much! We work hard to make this a great place for movie discussions. :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2008 11:23:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: If You&amp;#8217;re Not Excited About &amp;#8216;Watchmen,&amp;#8217; You&amp;#8217;re Dead Inside</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/if_you8217re_not_excited_about_8216watchmen8217_you8217re_dead_inside/#comment-21644346</link><description>@Film-book&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It WAS a 12 part comic book series. Now it's sold as a graphic novel.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 04 Jan 2009 12:44:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: If You&amp;#8217;re Not Excited About &amp;#8216;Watchmen,&amp;#8217; You&amp;#8217;re Dead Inside</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/if_you8217re_not_excited_about_8216watchmen8217_you8217re_dead_inside/#comment-21644341</link><description>@chris&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Uh, ok. If you say so. It only won a Hugo award. And is universally hailed as an amazing graphic novel.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 02 Jan 2009 18:51:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: If You&amp;#8217;re Not Excited About &amp;#8216;Watchmen,&amp;#8217; You&amp;#8217;re Dead Inside</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/if_you8217re_not_excited_about_8216watchmen8217_you8217re_dead_inside/#comment-21644327</link><description>@Metallicat&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I might recommend watching the movie and THEN reading the novel (as 790 is going to do).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;@Mat D.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Yeah, I understand - this is a very complex story and the transition to the big screen usually leaves things out and changes things. But I have to say, I'm a HUGE Iron Man fan going back over 30 years and I was ecstatic about how that film turned out.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2008 14:50:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: If You&amp;#8217;re Not Excited About &amp;#8216;Watchmen,&amp;#8217; You&amp;#8217;re Dead Inside</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/if_you8217re_not_excited_about_8216watchmen8217_you8217re_dead_inside/#comment-21644320</link><description>@Ken J&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Even if you're not "a graphic novel guy," has none of the footage or trailers gotten you stoked about this film?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2008 10:16:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A Premature End For The Harry Potter Movies?</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/a_premature_end_for_the_harry_potter_movies/#comment-21644286</link><description>@Joshi&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Of course it's ridiculous - this was more of a speculative post:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;em&gt;"it’s not really a cast iron piece of news but rather something that was alluded to by Potter screenwriter Steve Kloves"&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;:-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2008 10:58:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A Premature End For The Harry Potter Movies?</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/a_premature_end_for_the_harry_potter_movies/#comment-21644283</link><description>@Scully&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;What can I say? It was a very slow news day. 8-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2008 10:10:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Screen Rant’s Most Anticipated Movies Of 2009</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/screen_rants_most_anticipated_movies_of_2009/#comment-21644260</link><description>@jb&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Welcome to Screen Rant. I think you'll find that this is kind of a gathering place for folks who weren't exactly impressed with the Transformers movie. :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;As far as Avatar, you're right, but we're presuming it will be something major based on Cameron's reputation.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 11 Jan 2009 11:48:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Screen Rant’s Most Anticipated Movies Of 2009</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/screen_rants_most_anticipated_movies_of_2009/#comment-21644255</link><description>@Alex&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Dude, seriously? Alvin and the Chipmunks 2? More than Star Trek?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 23:37:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Screen Rant’s Most Anticipated Movies Of 2009</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/screen_rants_most_anticipated_movies_of_2009/#comment-21644248</link><description>@greenknight&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Indeed - those comics brought more "reality" into the superhero world, which is a better fit for the big screen.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;However sometimes I do miss the old days of comics where things were more black and white and they consisted mainly of the good guy beating the heck out of the bad guy with massive collateral damage. 8-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Seems like a lot of the time comics just aren't "fun" or escapism any more with all the socio-political themes that are being injected into them.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 02 Jan 2009 13:27:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Screen Rant’s Most Anticipated Movies Of 2009</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/screen_rants_most_anticipated_movies_of_2009/#comment-21644243</link><description>LOL @greenknight :-D&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2009 17:05:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Screen Rant’s Most Anticipated Movies Of 2009</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/screen_rants_most_anticipated_movies_of_2009/#comment-21644238</link><description>@Flamestrike&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thanks for answering. As I've said before, I'm cautiously optimistic about Star Trek despite my being a fan for 30+ years and I really think that Watchmen is going to be freaking awesome.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;James Cameron, although being an egotisical jerk, DOES know how to make fantastic films so I'm looking forward to Avatar. And I'm willing to give McG a chance a Terminator.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2009 04:19:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Screen Rant’s Most Anticipated Movies Of 2009</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/screen_rants_most_anticipated_movies_of_2009/#comment-21644233</link><description>@FlameStrike&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Hey bro, this is an honest question I'm curious about so don't read it the wrong way: Considering the Sci-Fi/Superhero/Blockbuster focus of Screen Rant, why do you read us? I'm sure there are other more esoteric movie sites out there that cover the sort of films you're referring to.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Sincerely,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2008 19:49:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Screen Rant’s Most Anticipated Movies Of 2009</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/screen_rants_most_anticipated_movies_of_2009/#comment-21644227</link><description>Thanks, Martin. I saw that a little bit ago and just posted it up here on the site. :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2008 00:25:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Screen Rant’s Most Anticipated Movies Of 2009</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/screen_rants_most_anticipated_movies_of_2009/#comment-21644214</link><description>Thanks, Ash - I've replaced the image. :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2008 15:43:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Screen Rant’s Most Anticipated Movies Of 2009</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/screen_rants_most_anticipated_movies_of_2009/#comment-21644212</link><description>GAH!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;ROOOOBBBBB!!!!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2008 15:27:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Fox vs. WB: The Ultimate Watchmen Showdown</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/fox_vs_wb_the_ultimate_watchmen_showdown/#comment-21644202</link><description>@790&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;At this point you'd probably enjoy both if you see the movie first and then read the book for more depth.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2008 16:34:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Fox vs. WB: The Ultimate Watchmen Showdown</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/fox_vs_wb_the_ultimate_watchmen_showdown/#comment-21644198</link><description>Hey guys, don't forget a while back I wrote a complete rundown of the Watchmen ownership history:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://screenrant.com/watchmen-movie-delay-fox-studio-fault-vic-3576/" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://screenrant.com/watchmen-movie-delay-fox-...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2008 15:52:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Fox vs. WB: The Ultimate Watchmen Showdown</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/fox_vs_wb_the_ultimate_watchmen_showdown/#comment-21644183</link><description>We'll be following this closely - very interesting to see who it turns out.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2008 00:14:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: New (Japanese) &amp;#8216;Street Fighter&amp;#8217; Trailer</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/new_japanese_8216street_fighter8217_trailer/#comment-21644141</link><description>Yeah, but you guys don't think this looks nearly as bad as Dragonball, do you? That thing looks like a high school movie project.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Or are you basing your opinions on familiarity with the source material (which I know NOTHING about).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2008 14:09:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: New Not Very Exciting Transformers 2 Images</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/new_not_very_exciting_transformers_2_images/#comment-21644125</link><description>We'll be posting the new pics up shortly... which are a bit more exciting than those above. :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2008 13:26:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: New Not Very Exciting Transformers 2 Images</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/new_not_very_exciting_transformers_2_images/#comment-21644111</link><description>@arrell&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Yeah, I'm not a fan of the first film at all, but giant battling robots between Egyptian pyramids could be at least visually cool.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 28 Dec 2008 22:35:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Talking During A Movie? Say Allo To My Leetle Friend</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/talking_during_a_movie_say_allo_to_my_leetle_friend/#comment-21644100</link><description>@Bob-C&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thanks so much for that update on the case! &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;On that note, I do believe I will close down comments on this.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 03 Jan 2009 14:45:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Talking During A Movie? Say Allo To My Leetle Friend</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/talking_during_a_movie_say_allo_to_my_leetle_friend/#comment-21644094</link><description>@Ken J&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Dude. DROP it. That's enough. For crying out loud, did you not read what I wrote above about this being pointless?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 02 Jan 2009 11:13:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Talking During A Movie? Say Allo To My Leetle Friend</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/talking_during_a_movie_say_allo_to_my_leetle_friend/#comment-21644083</link><description>Oops, that last comment was directed at Greenknight. :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;This is getting old - there's no point to debates of this sort online. Neither side convinces the other of anything, they just each get to vent their point of view.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 02 Jan 2009 00:05:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Talking During A Movie? Say Allo To My Leetle Friend</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/talking_during_a_movie_say_allo_to_my_leetle_friend/#comment-21643985</link><description>I actually worry more about the flip side of this situation - that some nut job will assault me for telling him to be quiet during a movie.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 28 Dec 2008 18:59:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: &amp;#8216;Death Race&amp;#8217; DVD Giveaway &amp;#8211; Winners!</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/8216death_race8217_dvd_giveaway_8211_winners/#comment-21643980</link><description>It's a busy time of year folks, I'll try to get the DVDs out as soon as I can.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2008 23:41:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: &amp;#8216;Death Race&amp;#8217; DVD Giveaway &amp;#8211; Winners!</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/8216death_race8217_dvd_giveaway_8211_winners/#comment-21643958</link><description>@790&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;LOL, I'm not trying to persuade you to enter. :-) If you've seen it and you don't like it, that's fine. A lot of people thought it was terrible - I just thought it was fine for what it was.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 20 Dec 2008 17:27:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: &amp;#8216;Death Race&amp;#8217; DVD Giveaway &amp;#8211; Winners!</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/8216death_race8217_dvd_giveaway_8211_winners/#comment-21643955</link><description>@790&lt;br&gt;If you hold the original in such high regard, maybe you'd better go watch it again (not slamming it, I love it - but it was WAY cheesy, even for its time). :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 20 Dec 2008 10:49:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: &amp;#8216;Death Race&amp;#8217; DVD Giveaway &amp;#8211; Winners!</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/8216death_race8217_dvd_giveaway_8211_winners/#comment-21643951</link><description>@790&lt;br&gt;You didn't like it? Really? I haven't seen the rated R version for comparison but I enjoyed the unrated one. Only thing is when the "bad guys" get it at the end it could have been more satisfyint.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;@Ken J&lt;br&gt;According to the special features on the DVD the stunts were indeed done in reality and not CG. They used minimal CGI in the movie according to the "making of."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 20 Dec 2008 00:17:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: &amp;#8216;Death Race&amp;#8217; DVD Giveaway &amp;#8211; Winners!</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/8216death_race8217_dvd_giveaway_8211_winners/#comment-21643948</link><description>@790&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Nice opening comment on a great giveaway. I agree with Kofi's review here on the site - it was a fun movie for what it was.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 20 Dec 2008 00:00:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Revolutionary Road Review</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/revolutionary_road_review/#comment-21643932</link><description>Hey Matt, thanks for your comment. Welcome to Screen Rant! :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 03 Jan 2009 21:47:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Revolutionary Road Review</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/revolutionary_road_review/#comment-21643926</link><description>@Charles&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;This movie really is all about the performances more than anything else. For that I'd say it's worth it.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 26 Dec 2008 12:19:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Revolutionary Road Review</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/revolutionary_road_review/#comment-21643925</link><description>@Brooke&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Tell you what, some time you try going to see a movie you know nothing about, paying attention to the plot, performances, character names and writing all that down on a pad in the dark while not missing anything that's going on.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;M'kay?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Oh, and you're bitching after I give the freaking movie 4.5/5 stars? Talk about acting like a 5 year old.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 26 Dec 2008 12:17:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Marley and Me Review</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/marley_and_me_review/#comment-21643901</link><description>Dan and Ryan,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Are you parents? DO you have children? If not then frankly your opinion is worthless in regards to the inappropriate content of this film. It was rated PG and targeted at families with young children. When you have your own kids then you can judge what is appropriate for them.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And this review is part of "research" for a film - it was written to let people know about it.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And Dan, yes, exactly - we own pets to "enrich our lives" and a pet that disrupts my household and my family does NOT enrich my life. And yes, dogs should be disciplined and obey their owners.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I do have a dog and have had dogs in the past. They were always loved AND WELL BEHAVED due to my training.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;So take your sanctimonious crap elsewhere.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I've had it with people that put animals at the same level as people - absolutely and unequivocally HAD it. Of COURSE animals should not be mistreated, but that doesn't mean I or my family as to suffer or put up with an animal that:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;1. Destroys my home.&lt;br&gt;2. Endangers my family or others.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If people are too stupid and/or lazy to train their dogs properly, well, then they're stupid and lazy. Ever watch an episode of "The Dog Whisperer?" Or do you think that Cesar Milan is "cruel" to dogs and that he shouldn't be allowed near them either.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And Steven, if your only criteria for a movie being "good" is that it makes you cry, that makes you a pretty poor judge of film.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I'm done with this thread.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 15:23:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Marley and Me Review</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/marley_and_me_review/#comment-21643880</link><description>Scott: THANK YOU!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;There, proof positive I'm not insane. You loved the book, thought the movie did not give a reason to love the dog and as a cherry on top you bring up the Grogans and Cesar Chavez stating that the dog's behavior was the Grogan's doing (which I thought WAS conveyed in the film).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thanks SO much for taking the time to comment here, bro. :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2008 01:43:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Marley and Me Review</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/marley_and_me_review/#comment-21643875</link><description>Thanks, guys but he's gone. If he tries to post again I'll just ban his dumb, cowardly ass.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2008 23:39:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Marley and Me Review</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/marley_and_me_review/#comment-21643865</link><description>@Ken J&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Don't recall that one. But it was handled in a similar manner in "My Dog Skip."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I can NOT recommend that movie highly enough! You want to see a great movie about the relationship between an owner (a boy) and his dog that will make you well up, go rent or buy that movie.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 28 Dec 2008 18:28:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Marley and Me Review</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/marley_and_me_review/#comment-21643850</link><description>@Jill&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I sent an email to you right before seeing your comment above. :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It seems that we need to add something to the "topics you don't discuss at cocktail parties." In addition to religion, sex and politics it seems we need to add "pets." :-P&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Best,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 27 Dec 2008 15:04:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Marley and Me Review</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/marley_and_me_review/#comment-21643848</link><description>@Jill&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;First off, I want to apologize for the "children" remark. I attributed a comment regarding kids and dogs being equivalent that was not made by you. Second, my remark about Marley being shot didn't mean I *wanted* to see him shot, not at all - it was an example of something that would have made all the trouble he caused worth putting up with. I wanted to see something... ANYTHING that indicated this pain in the butt dog was worth putting up with. Whether it be heroic, consoling, whatever.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I'm sorry we got off on the wrong foot, but let me assure you that I am as horrified and disgusted by cases of animal abuse as you are.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;@Talynrider&lt;br&gt;"dealing with life and the loss of one frustrating, furry, devoted, beloved, friend, and companion."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;One of my major issues with the film is that they did NOT suhow the "devoted... friend and companion" aspect in the movie. In virtually every single scene in the movie the dog was being frustrating, annoying and destructive. I didn't see much anything to offset this in the way of "good" behavior or even just plain old companionship that made the dog worthwhile.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I recall ONE single scene that lasted about 10 seconds - when the wife had miscarried, that the dog was portrayed as being loving/supportive/whatever.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;That was IT.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 27 Dec 2008 14:10:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Marley and Me Review</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/marley_and_me_review/#comment-21643837</link><description>@Lola&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Again, another ludicrous comparison. Anyone who puts a dog at the same level as a child should NEVER have one IMHO.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Period.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 26 Dec 2008 17:20:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Marley and Me Review</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/marley_and_me_review/#comment-21643831</link><description>@Doug C&lt;br&gt;Go rent "My Dog Skip." Now THAT'S a great dog movie with tons of heart. You won't regret it.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;@ash&lt;br&gt;The VAST majority of people who go see this movie will not have read the book. A movie should be able to tell a story and stand on its own without a prerequisite of having read the source material. As to your comment about my expectations, even YOU mention that in the book the dog brings the family closer together. I saw no such thing in this film.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;@nancy&lt;br&gt;Every dog I've ever owned I've gotten from the pound, and I've TRAINED it to behave, unlike the knuckleheads in this movie. And although I realize that in your world dog = child, in my world child &amp;gt; dog. Sorry.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;@Jill&lt;br&gt;I've owned dogs all my life, but people are people and pets are pets. As I said above, every dog/cat I've owned has come from a shelter. If I had a dog destroying my house I would TRAIN IT. If I had a cat (far less trainable) that peed all over my house no matter what I did to try to teach it not to, it would be GONE. I would be fearful if you ever had a child. If your house was on fire it sounds like you might actually hesitate and have to think about whether to rescue your infant (which you would have only "known" for a few weeks/months) or a your dog that you would have had for years.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thanks for all the feedback, folks. It seems to me that the movie just didn't manage to convey the true core of the book. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt; &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Again, I say to you all, go rent "My Dog Skip" if you want the best "dog movie" ever. And yes, the dog dies at the end of that one but it's not graphic at all, while it is sad.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 26 Dec 2008 12:07:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Marley and Me Review</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/marley_and_me_review/#comment-21643805</link><description>@jackie&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Typical comment from someone who is not a parent. And no, being a friend of a parent or even being an aunt/uncle is NOT the same. What a ludicrous analogy, I mean really.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I'm actually betting the book was far better than the film - to me the film didn't demonstrate WHY the love for this furry terrorist. I'll bet the book demonstrated more of that than the film - something that was severly lacking in my opinion.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 25 Dec 2008 00:41:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: What Are Your Favorite Christmas Movies?</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/what_are_your_favorite_christmas_movies/#comment-21643761</link><description>@zombie_elvis&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Oh, man... LOVE "The Thing." If it's not under my tree tomorrow I think I may have to use a Best Buy gift card and pick up the Blu-Ray.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Only problem is I have to watch it by myself because my wife HATES scary movies and my daughter's only 12. :-P&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 24 Dec 2008 12:06:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: What Are Your Favorite Christmas Movies?</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/what_are_your_favorite_christmas_movies/#comment-21643760</link><description>@Metallicat79&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;LOL, made you dig deep, did I? :-P&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Have you ever seen "It's a Wonderful Life?" If not, you MUST check it out!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 24 Dec 2008 12:05:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: What Are Your Favorite Christmas Movies?</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/what_are_your_favorite_christmas_movies/#comment-21643755</link><description>You know, I don't even remember anything about Home Alone 2... should probably rent it sometime.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Post your faves here Mettalicat! :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 24 Dec 2008 11:39:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: What Are Your Favorite Christmas Movies?</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/what_are_your_favorite_christmas_movies/#comment-21643752</link><description>Nope, that one just never really did it for me - odd combination of starting out cute and cuddly then turning into pretty much a horror movie. :-P&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;What's on your list, Scott?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 24 Dec 2008 11:28:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Disney NOT Producing Third Narnia Film</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/disney_not_producing_third_narnia_film/#comment-21643737</link><description>The problem is even though there was plenty of spectacle in the Narnia movies, it seemed like they had no soul - a very odd thing considering the source material...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 24 Dec 2008 11:28:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Discussion &amp;#8211; December 24, 2008</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/open_discussion_8211_december_24_2008/#comment-21643717</link><description>@Ash Ali&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Unless I go out of my way to see it, probably not. But with no pre-screenings next week maybe I'll go see it one night.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 27 Dec 2008 13:57:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Discussion &amp;#8211; December 24, 2008</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/open_discussion_8211_december_24_2008/#comment-21643712</link><description>@High Kalibur&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I should drag my rear to see The Spirit and Valkyrie (wasn't on the list for pre-screenings) but I really would rather spend this weekend with my family.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 26 Dec 2008 12:38:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Discussion &amp;#8211; December 24, 2008</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/open_discussion_8211_december_24_2008/#comment-21643695</link><description>@Metallicat&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Writing something up now. No slam on you bro! :-D&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 24 Dec 2008 10:59:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Discussion &amp;#8211; December 24, 2008</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/open_discussion_8211_december_24_2008/#comment-21643692</link><description>@Metallicat&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Dude, you're KILLING me with those Christmas movie selections. :-P I need to put up a post! :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 24 Dec 2008 10:36:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Discussion &amp;#8211; December 24, 2008</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/open_discussion_8211_december_24_2008/#comment-21643691</link><description>@Fred&lt;br&gt;Yeah, I think "Thor" is going to be the trickiest character to make work in the Avengers film.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;@No Name Face&lt;br&gt;Oh man... do you have ANY idea how much work it takes to run this site and how long it took me to assemble a team of great writers? You may not know this, but I have a day job. I suppose if I just told my wife and daughter I'd never see them again I could swing it. :-P&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;BTW, thanks for the suggestion, seriously - it tells me you like the work we do here! :-D&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 24 Dec 2008 10:32:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: New Monsters vs. Aliens Trailer Gives More Detail</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/new_monsters_vs_aliens_trailer_gives_more_detail/#comment-21643667</link><description>So her wedding garter is less stretchy than her dress? How does that pop off but her dress grows to match her size? And "boobies?"&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Yeesh.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Yeah, yeah... nit picking, I know.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I think "Bob" will be the best thing in the movie.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2008 18:32:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: First Official Super-Exciting &amp;#8216;Avatar&amp;#8217; Image Released</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/first_official_super_exciting_8216avatar8217_image_released/#comment-21643649</link><description>@Aaron&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I have no idea what that means... That you'll start out excited about the movie and then you'll drop into an abyss of despair over its cinematic ruins?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;That's how I felt during Indy 4, anyway. 8-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2008 18:35:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: John Cho Is NOT The Mandarin In Iron Man 2</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/john_cho_is_not_the_mandarin_in_iron_man_2/#comment-21643571</link><description>The concept of the Mandarin character in the Iron Man movie(s) is that he would be behind the scenes manipulating things much like the Emperor in Star Wars 4-6. The idea early on was for Mandarin to be the full-on villain in the third film.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2008 13:45:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Top Time Shifted TV Shows And &amp;#8216;Ad Creep&amp;#8217;</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/top_time_shifted_tv_shows_and_8216ad_creep8217/#comment-21643562</link><description>Yeah, I was shocked to see a post over at AICN about a Survivor season finale - can't believe that's still on.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I do have a couple of guilty pleasures when it comes to reality shows though: The Biggest Loser (I love seeing people turn their lives/health around) and The Mole (it's a great whodunit).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2008 13:22:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Weekend Movie News Wrap Up: December 21, 2008</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/weekend_movie_news_wrap_up_december_21_2008/#comment-21643521</link><description>Wow, if a highlight of a movie is a police officer who is doing his job being intentionally crushed by a car then I'm ecstatic that we're on opposite sides in movie taste.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And if it had awesome "grey goo effects," well then WHAT was I thinking?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2008 15:25:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Weekend Movie News Wrap Up: December 21, 2008</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/weekend_movie_news_wrap_up_december_21_2008/#comment-21643515</link><description>@cimco&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Uh, right... whatever.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Good word of mouth on this would have trumped "blogosphere fanboys" any day or the week. If people thought it was great they'd recommend it to their friends. 75% is HUGE! I don't recal the last time a big event movie dropped that much in its second weekend.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Maybe you can go see it a few more times and try to bring the numbers up.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 21 Dec 2008 19:50:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Weekend Movie News Wrap Up: December 21, 2008</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/weekend_movie_news_wrap_up_december_21_2008/#comment-21643510</link><description>SWEET VALIDATION!!!!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;A 75% drop from opening to second weekend for DTESS is freaking brutal. Usually anything over 60% signals bad word of mouth, but 75%? Bloody OUCH.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 21 Dec 2008 12:31:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Christmas Triple DVD Giveaway Winners!</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/christmas_triple_dvd_giveaway_winners/#comment-21643454</link><description>Winners announced - see above!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2008 17:19:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Christmas Triple DVD Giveaway Winners!</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/christmas_triple_dvd_giveaway_winners/#comment-21643450</link><description>@Metallicat&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Oh now that's too funny. I'm a huge fan of "A Christmas Story" and my wife doesn't like it either. :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 20:09:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Frank Miller To Hopefully Not Ruin &amp;#8216;Buck Rogers&amp;#8217;</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/frank_miller_to_hopefully_not_ruin_8216buck_rogers8217/#comment-21643415</link><description>@Luke&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I really like Miller's comic work - I just don't think the guy knows how to direct a movie.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2008 10:56:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Frank Miller To Hopefully Not Ruin &amp;#8216;Buck Rogers&amp;#8217;</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/frank_miller_to_hopefully_not_ruin_8216buck_rogers8217/#comment-21643402</link><description>He didn't direct Robocop 2 and had a co-director credit on Sin City, which was REALLY directed by an experienced Robert Rodriguez. He also did NOT direct "300."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;He had writing credits on all those but a good writer does not necessarily equal a good director (as it seems "The Spirit" will prove in spades).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 21 Dec 2008 00:53:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Frank Miller To Hopefully Not Ruin &amp;#8216;Buck Rogers&amp;#8217;</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/frank_miller_to_hopefully_not_ruin_8216buck_rogers8217/#comment-21643400</link><description>@790&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Based on what?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 21 Dec 2008 00:39:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Frank Miller To Hopefully Not Ruin &amp;#8216;Buck Rogers&amp;#8217;</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/frank_miller_to_hopefully_not_ruin_8216buck_rogers8217/#comment-21643396</link><description>Oh, Frank Miller is most definitely NOT a hack - but being a great comic book writer doesn't automatically make you a great movie director.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;In regards to Robocop, we really need to do an update on that... I know there's been news on it recently.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 20 Dec 2008 17:25:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Frank Miller To Hopefully Not Ruin &amp;#8216;Buck Rogers&amp;#8217;</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/frank_miller_to_hopefully_not_ruin_8216buck_rogers8217/#comment-21643381</link><description>Here's the deal on a review of The Spirit: There are two major companies that handle pre-screenings of movies - and at the moment I only have a relationship with ONE of them. I'm going to try to get the other one on the phone today because I'm missing out on a lot of screenings.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And since this opens on Christmas, I won't be seeing it that day so my review will be pretty delayed, unfortunately. In any case I'm hearing that it is uttter CRAP. Like "Battlefield Earth" bad. I've thought so ever since I saw the Comic-Con footage and first trailer.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2008 13:57:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Seven Pounds Review</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/seven_pounds_review/#comment-21643325</link><description>Rose,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;You know, people like you really annoy me. Awesome, you found ONE grammatical error in a 681 word review! Bravo!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And instead of politely pointing it out, you decided it would be better to berate me - while disregarding the content of the entire review.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;For your information, my goal is to have every article on Screen Rant published without grammatical or spelling errors, and I think I do a pretty damned good job. I run the site, write for it AND serve as editor for a half dozen writers that pump out a lot of content every day. All this in addition to working a full time job.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;So excuse me for letting one tiny little error slip through.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 11:29:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Seven Pounds Review</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/seven_pounds_review/#comment-21643314</link><description>@Susanne&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;My wife had the exact same reaction, so you're not alone.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2008 11:47:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Seven Pounds Review</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/seven_pounds_review/#comment-21643300</link><description>@Jeff&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Sorry, bud. That was intended as a slam on the movie, not viewers. Both my wife and I "got it" very early on, as have the majority of people who've seen it based on what I've read.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Let's call it even based on your first comment as a response to my review. :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Best,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 26 Dec 2008 13:49:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Seven Pounds Review</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/seven_pounds_review/#comment-21643298</link><description>@Jeff&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I do enjoy movies, that's why I run a movie site. Want examples? Check out my 4 and 5 star movie reviews.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 26 Dec 2008 13:19:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Seven Pounds Review</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/seven_pounds_review/#comment-21643285</link><description>@Daniel F&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Well film IS a subjective medium. I score movies the way I score them. My personal tastes and views inform my movie ratings - I don't apologize for that... it's just my way of reviewing films.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2008 20:52:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Seven Pounds Review</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/seven_pounds_review/#comment-21643283</link><description>@Daniel F&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I hear what you're saying - in our "About Us" page I point out that my movie reviewing philosophy is more targeted towards helping the average person decide whether to drop their hard-earned money on a movie or not, moreso than whether a film is "cinematically excellent."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I do believe that (for my tastes) it's a far better indicator of whether I will like a film than IMDB - NO contest. IMDB is the sort of place people flock to and say that "Transformers" or "Eagle Eye" was like, TOTALLY awesome. 8-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I actually think that RT gives a pretty balanced view of a movie as a whole. Compared to Metacritic which I think is more about the highbrow sort of review.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2008 18:33:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Seven Pounds Review</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/seven_pounds_review/#comment-21643281</link><description>@Daniel F&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Sigh... it's not the "end all be all," it's just a consensus. They have the "cream of the crop" score and the more general reviewers score. It's great as a general gauge of whether a movie is worth checking out or not.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I don't always agree with the consensus, but generally anything over 50% there's a very good chance I'll like it. :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;BTW, so you think the general public that buys Britney Spears albums and is giving it 83% is a better indicator than reviewers on RT? 8-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2008 16:58:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Seven Pounds Review</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/seven_pounds_review/#comment-21643279</link><description>@Oscar&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;LOL, actually someone recently told me I lost all credibility when I said that I thought that Death Race was awesome. 8-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2008 13:50:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Seven Pounds Review</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/seven_pounds_review/#comment-21643277</link><description>@Daniel F&lt;br&gt;Guess what? I'm being WAY more generous than most reviewers out there - the average on Rotten Tomatoes is about 2/5 and on Metacritic it's less than that. My rating of PWZ was based on my finding it entertaining.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;@Jess H&lt;br&gt;I didn't say two hours is too long for a movie - I said it was too long for THIS movie. :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2008 10:18:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: &amp;#8216;Tron 2&amp;#8242; Will Be 3D</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/8216tron_28242_will_be_3d/#comment-21643254</link><description>I'm a fan of 3D, but not when they do the gimmicky "leap at the audience" junk. I like the enhance depth of field and putting the viewer in the movie aspect.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;This does seem to be a great fit... better at putting us inside the virtual world.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 15:13:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Discussion &amp;#8211; December 10, 2008</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/open_discussion_8211_december_10_2008/#comment-21641973</link><description>@Spark&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Here's our page for the film:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://screenrant.com/tag/push/" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://screenrant.com/tag/push/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I actually received a pre-movie comic in the mail the other day with some backstory for the film. I think it's going to be a 6 part series.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2008 10:29:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Discussion &amp;#8211; December 10, 2008</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/open_discussion_8211_december_10_2008/#comment-21641956</link><description>@greenknight&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Heck, I don't know from Oscars... I suppose it could win/be nominated.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2008 19:09:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Discussion &amp;#8211; December 10, 2008</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/open_discussion_8211_december_10_2008/#comment-21641951</link><description>The last couple of episodes of Heroes really have come back strong IMHO. More cohesive and character driven... I'm liking it.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2008 16:53:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Discussion &amp;#8211; December 10, 2008</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/open_discussion_8211_december_10_2008/#comment-21641945</link><description>Hey you regular Screen Rant weenies, have you bothered to enter our latest DVD giveaway? As of right now your odds of winning would be 1 in 8. How can you NOT enter with odds like that? :-P&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2008 14:29:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Discussion &amp;#8211; December 10, 2008</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/open_discussion_8211_december_10_2008/#comment-21641942</link><description>@greeknight&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Do you mean "Revolutionary Road?" I saw it and wrote a review that I can't publish until it's released at the end of this month. Big time Oscar material all around.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2008 13:51:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Discussion &amp;#8211; December 10, 2008</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/open_discussion_8211_december_10_2008/#comment-21641936</link><description>@Andrew James&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Have you not been here over the last 6 months? I had the site redesigned quite a while back. :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;BTW, I find this timely considering the message of the uber-enviro-friendly "Day the Earth Stood Still" release this Friday:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://twurl.nl/d6de16" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://twurl.nl/d6de16&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;8-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2008 10:49:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: First Full Terminator: Salvation Trailer (Rocks!)</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/first_full_terminator_salvation_trailer_rocks/#comment-21641915</link><description>@shawn&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Yeah, that's a weird bit of casting IMHO.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;REALLY weird.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 15 Feb 2009 23:02:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: First Full Terminator: Salvation Trailer (Rocks!)</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/first_full_terminator_salvation_trailer_rocks/#comment-21641903</link><description>You know, Charles, if you freaking hate it here so much why the hell do you continue to come back?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I may just do you a favor and ban you from even being able to visit the site at all, nevermind just taking away your ability to comment.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2008 22:55:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: First Full Terminator: Salvation Trailer (Rocks!)</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/first_full_terminator_salvation_trailer_rocks/#comment-21641885</link><description>@Dannyboy&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Well by the time this movie comes out it will have been six years since the last Terminator movie came out. The ratings for Sarah Connor are pretty low, and even fewer people read comic books.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I don't think saturation is an issue.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2008 11:51:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: First Full Terminator: Salvation Trailer (Rocks!)</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/first_full_terminator_salvation_trailer_rocks/#comment-21641883</link><description>Gotta say, whatever casting director thought Anton Yelchin was a good match for a young Michael Biehn was definitely off his/her nut. And the fact that McG didn't veto that bugs me as well.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I know he's the "flavor of the month," but come on...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Other than that though, this looks great. Only wish they would have gone with a full-CGI Ahnuld in there.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2008 10:51:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Dark Knight Special Edition DVD Winners!</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/the_dark_knight_special_edition_dvd_winners/#comment-21641842</link><description>Good news, gang! They'll be sending me the widescreen version of the movie! I should get them in a day or two and then I'll turn right around and get them out to you. :-D&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2008 18:49:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Dark Knight Special Edition DVD Winners!</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/the_dark_knight_special_edition_dvd_winners/#comment-21641840</link><description>Dan,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I've got it if you're the guy in IL. :-) No promises on the widescreen - I'll do my best but if they don't replace them there's nothing I can do.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thanks,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2008 23:59:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Dark Knight Special Edition DVD Winners!</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/the_dark_knight_special_edition_dvd_winners/#comment-21641837</link><description>Guys, you're not going to believe this: They sent me the FULL SCREEN version of the DVD.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I've emailed them back - I don't intend to send those out. Hopefully they will send me the widescreen version and once I get those I'll pop them in the mail.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Yeesh... full screen?!?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2008 19:22:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Dark Knight Special Edition DVD Winners!</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/the_dark_knight_special_edition_dvd_winners/#comment-21641832</link><description>LOL, my "Woo Hoo" Christmas present is going to be a Blu-Ray player. :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2008 00:51:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Dark Knight Special Edition DVD Winners!</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/the_dark_knight_special_edition_dvd_winners/#comment-21641829</link><description>FYI, I haven't received the DVDs yet. As soon as I get them I'll get them out in the mail.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 09 Dec 2008 21:44:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Dark Knight Special Edition DVD Winners!</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/the_dark_knight_special_edition_dvd_winners/#comment-21641827</link><description>@John&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Did you even enter? I saw hardly any email addresses of SR "regulars."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 09 Dec 2008 15:01:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Dark Knight Special Edition DVD Winners!</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/the_dark_knight_special_edition_dvd_winners/#comment-21641816</link><description>Anyone already signed up for the newsletter is golden. :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 11:03:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Dark Knight Special Edition DVD Winners!</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/the_dark_knight_special_edition_dvd_winners/#comment-21641810</link><description>Doh!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thanks for pointing that out... It should be DECEMBER 8th!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 17:04:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Trying Out Google Friend Connect On Screen Rant</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/trying_out_google_friend_connect_on_screen_rant/#comment-21641767</link><description>Resistance is futile...</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2008 18:54:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Bond 23: Back To James Bond Basics?</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/bond_23_back_to_james_bond_basics/#comment-21641752</link><description>I really, REALLY hope this turns out to be accurate. I did NOT like QoS... hated the way the action scenes were shot, there was little if any actual "spy" stuff going on, and Bond has been reduced to almost nothing more than a brutal killer.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I want the next film to leap forward a couple of years to where he is in full-on "suave 007" mode.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2008 15:17:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: More Unnecessary Remakes On The Way</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/more_unnecessary_remakes_on_the_way/#comment-21641708</link><description>Well we're giving away the original "Day the Earth Stood Still" here on the site. :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 09 Dec 2008 16:13:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: More Unnecessary Remakes On The Way</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/more_unnecessary_remakes_on_the_way/#comment-21641702</link><description>LOL, be nice, boys. If CD wants to contribute to the site in a civil manner he is more than welcome. :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2008 18:53:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: More Unnecessary Remakes On The Way</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/more_unnecessary_remakes_on_the_way/#comment-21641697</link><description>@David&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Check my list of Top 5 Rules for Movie Remakes linked in the article above. John Carpenter's "The Thing" passes the test. :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2008 10:30:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: More Unnecessary Remakes On The Way</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/more_unnecessary_remakes_on_the_way/#comment-21641684</link><description>@Charles Darwin&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;They make them because they have built in name recognition, it's easier to write a script that's bascially a duplicate of another, and they make money.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Not that I'm defending them, of course!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 07 Dec 2008 19:04:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: More Unnecessary Remakes On The Way</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/more_unnecessary_remakes_on_the_way/#comment-21641681</link><description>LOL,some of the best movie lines EVER are in "They Live." :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If anyone hasn't seen it, GO RENT IT (except for Daniel F, who doesn't apprecitate B movies). 8-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 07 Dec 2008 15:03:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Dark Knight Heads Back To Theaters January 23rd</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/the_dark_knight_heads_back_to_theaters_january_23rd/#comment-21641661</link><description>Charles, Charles, Charles... you are on the WRONG website my friend.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 07 Dec 2008 01:03:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Dark Knight Heads Back To Theaters January 23rd</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/the_dark_knight_heads_back_to_theaters_january_23rd/#comment-21641652</link><description>Yeah... if WB wants to re-release it and people show up, so what? I think people are wondering though how many will still go to the movies to see it. Everybody and their mother has seen it once or twice plus with the release on DVD/Blu-Ray I wouldn't think they'd bring in more buckets of money.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 06 Dec 2008 17:54:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Punisher: War Zone Review</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/punisher_war_zone_review/#comment-21641635</link><description>@huntthejest&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Well I'm sorry to hear that - maybe this movie just caught me in a good mood, or my expectations for it were so low that it surpassed them.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2009 17:37:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Punisher: War Zone Review</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/punisher_war_zone_review/#comment-21641630</link><description>Sorry, Oscar - no idea. I suggest a Google search... that's what I'd do. :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 27 Dec 2008 22:14:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Punisher: War Zone Review</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/punisher_war_zone_review/#comment-21641628</link><description>I think only Spider-Man, X-Men and Punisher belong to other studios.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 27 Dec 2008 16:37:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Punisher: War Zone Review</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/punisher_war_zone_review/#comment-21641626</link><description>Yup, Marvel has all those.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 27 Dec 2008 13:56:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Punisher: War Zone Review</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/punisher_war_zone_review/#comment-21641611</link><description>@Ryan&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Oh my gosh - now I feel bad! Plus, I actually met the actor this summer in San Diego and didn't know it was him in the movie (double doh!). :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 23:43:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Punisher: War Zone Review</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/punisher_war_zone_review/#comment-21641581</link><description>@brent&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Welcome to Screen Rant! I hope you stick around. :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 09 Dec 2008 16:13:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Punisher: War Zone Review</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/punisher_war_zone_review/#comment-21641574</link><description>See now here's the thing with this movie - I think the camp was intentional. Problem is it wanted to have it both ways: Serious vigilante movie but yet have some humor.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;You can't tell me that the scene where Jigsaw was recruiting members with an American flag flying behind him on a huge video screen wasn't supposed to be funny on purpose!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 09 Dec 2008 00:35:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Punisher: War Zone Review</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/punisher_war_zone_review/#comment-21641568</link><description>@High Kalibur&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Keep in mind this was NOT a Marvel Studios movie - it's a Lionsgate film. Big difference.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2008 21:05:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Punisher: War Zone Review</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/punisher_war_zone_review/#comment-21641556</link><description>@Andrew Leslie&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thanks, bro. That's always great to hear. Spread the word about Screen Rant! :-P&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Best,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 07 Dec 2008 22:47:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Punisher: War Zone Review</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/punisher_war_zone_review/#comment-21641552</link><description>@greenknight&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Marvel won't revive this under their studio banner because they've said they'll never go above a PG-13 rating for their superhero flicks.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 07 Dec 2008 19:04:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Punisher: War Zone Review</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/punisher_war_zone_review/#comment-21641523</link><description>@Daniel&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thanks, bro, I appreciate that. Film is after all, a subjective thing.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Have you never enjoyed a good ol' "B" movie, Daniel? Heck, pick any sci-fi/horror movie from the 1950s. Schlocky as hell, certainly not well made but tons of fun. :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 06 Dec 2008 10:44:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Punisher: War Zone Review</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/punisher_war_zone_review/#comment-21641517</link><description>@Rampage&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Hey man, I'll be very curious to hear YOUR thoughts on the film. Come back here and let us know!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 06 Dec 2008 01:07:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Punisher: War Zone Review</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/punisher_war_zone_review/#comment-21641514</link><description>And guys, I *really* appreciate your support. You rock. :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 23:40:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Punisher: War Zone Review</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/punisher_war_zone_review/#comment-21641509</link><description>@Charles Darwin&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Buh Bye. Don't let the door hit your ass on the way out.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 21:58:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: DiCaprio &amp;amp; Winslet Reunite In Revolutionary Road</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/dicaprio_amp_winslet_reunite_in_revolutionary_road/#comment-21641471</link><description>@cdf&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Nope, I haven't. You'd think I'd get around to seeing more movies. :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Actually I tend more towards that action/superhero/sci-fi genres. I'm not much into dramas.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;@Jess H&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I have to admit that I actually enjoyed Titanic and I pull the DVD out about once a year to watch it. :-P&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 10:38:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Watchmen Gets Shorter</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/watchmen_gets_shorter/#comment-21641464</link><description>If I recall, right about the time they went to the boats on the harbor it started to feel like "isn't this over yet?" to me (my wife mentioned the same thing to me after seeing the film).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 17:28:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Watchmen Gets Shorter</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/watchmen_gets_shorter/#comment-21641459</link><description>I thought TDK felt long as well, but don't ask me what I would have cut. :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Actually there are some movies that are long but don't FEEL long at all. If it can keep me engaged all the way through and avoid the deadly moment where I suddenly feel the need to look at my watch, then I don't care if it's 3 hours long. 8-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 10:36:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Cool New Pics From &amp;#8216;X-Men Origins: Wolverine&amp;#8217;</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/cool_new_pics_from_8216x_men_origins_wolverine8217/#comment-21641441</link><description>Guys, we just have to accept that this is the "movie" Wolverine - similar to the comic book character, but not identical.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;End of story.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 10:34:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Cool New Pics From &amp;#8216;X-Men Origins: Wolverine&amp;#8217;</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/cool_new_pics_from_8216x_men_origins_wolverine8217/#comment-21641433</link><description>@manuel87&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I'm pretty sure it's WWII.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 09:44:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How To Save The Next &amp;#8216;Indiana Jones&amp;#8217; Movie</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/how_to_save_the_next_8216indiana_jones8217_movie/#comment-21641411</link><description>@Stritch&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;You have to post your comments here using the same email address you used to register at &lt;a href="http://Gravatar.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;Gravatar.com&lt;/a&gt; and it should automatically appear shortly.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 17:44:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How To Save The Next &amp;#8216;Indiana Jones&amp;#8217; Movie</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/how_to_save_the_next_8216indiana_jones8217_movie/#comment-21641390</link><description>I'm sorry but Lucas needs to just recuse himself to ILM and spend the rest of his life enjoying himself playing with his CGI rendering programs.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;As a filmmaker, he's done.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 23:18:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Will Actors Go On Strike?</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/will_actors_go_on_strike/#comment-21640806</link><description>@KEL&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Actually you're looking at that top 1% that bring in the monster bucks. I'd say the VAST majority don't make that much and don't work steadily.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Of course the motivation for actors is that they'll reach that 1%, but 1% is 1% no matter how you slice it.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It's like when you have 80% of drivers thinking that they're "above average." 8-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 21:13:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Will Actors Go On Strike?</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/will_actors_go_on_strike/#comment-21640803</link><description>@Gary&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I would think so - at this point the whole thing should be in the can.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 12:47:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Will Actors Go On Strike?</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/will_actors_go_on_strike/#comment-21640794</link><description>With the current economic climate and people concerned about their own jobs, I don't think actors will get ANY sympathy from the public if they go on strike - especially if it delays movies people are looking forward to seeing. In tough times movies always do well because people are looking for escapism.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2008 22:47:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Weekend Movie News Wrap Up: November 23, 2008</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/weekend_movie_news_wrap_up_november_23_2008/#comment-21640789</link><description>@Metallicat79&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Heck, even most THIRD movies aren't very good. Usually the first sequel in a series is the best in a series IMHO. Spider-Man, Star Wars (originals), Star Trek movies, Aliens, etc., etc.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;That's why I'm really looking forward to Iron Man 2. :-D&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 12:47:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: &amp;#8216;Twilight&amp;#8217; Sequel &amp;#8216;New Moon&amp;#8217; On The Way</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/8216twilight8217_sequel_8216new_moon8217_on_the_way/#comment-21640764</link><description>Jess, Oscar, I deleted that guy's comment. Pretty funny actually - if you're going to spam a site with a link to a Squidoo lens it might be a good idea to NOT insult people. 8-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2008 11:10:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: &amp;#8216;Twilight&amp;#8217; Sequel &amp;#8216;New Moon&amp;#8217; On The Way</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/8216twilight8217_sequel_8216new_moon8217_on_the_way/#comment-21640754</link><description>@Sil&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The same screenwriter is returning for the sequel. Don't know about the director.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 22:55:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Off Topic Rant: Man Up Or Shut Up</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/off_topic_rant_man_up_or_shut_up/#comment-21640751</link><description>@Troy&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thanks very much. I wish more regular visitors would "de-lurk" and join in on the conversations here. :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 27 Nov 2008 13:54:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Off Topic Rant: Man Up Or Shut Up</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/off_topic_rant_man_up_or_shut_up/#comment-21640745</link><description>Thanks guys, I do appreciate your comments about the site. We work hard to make it what it is and a bit unique when compared to other sites.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 12:49:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Off Topic Rant: Man Up Or Shut Up</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/off_topic_rant_man_up_or_shut_up/#comment-21640736</link><description>@Jim Dandy&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Let's be clear: NO ONE CAN SEE YOUR EMAIL ADDRESS except for myself and my writers. It is not visible or made available to regular site visitors in any way. It can't be seen be viewing the page source code or anything like that.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;So while I can understand your online paranoia (and I don't mean that in a bad way at ALL with all the spambots out there) your concerns about it are completely unwarranted.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The thing is when someone subscribes to a comment thread that is popular and I get a continuous string of bounced emails because it's a bogus address, it bugs the hell out of me.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2008 19:13:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Off Topic Rant: Man Up Or Shut Up</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/off_topic_rant_man_up_or_shut_up/#comment-21640728</link><description>@Dave Fernandez&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I appreciate what you're saying but I believe you are twisting what I said. Here is my exact quote:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;em&gt;"Digg 'regulars' are notoriously Left/Liberal/Atheist for the vast majority. "&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;That means that they EITHER "Left," "Liberal," or "Athiest" for the most part over there - and that my friend, is obvious to anyone who frequents that website. That does not mean that I'm saying "if you're one of those, you're all of them."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thanks for noting that I apologized for bringing it up in a post where it would have been better left out, though.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Considering the hundreds of comments and posts I've written, I'm entitled to slip up once in a while (I am human, believe it or not). I'm talking about people whose stock in trade is to be antagonistic online day in and day out.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And folks, Ken J is right: the point of this post was most certainly NOT to apologize for a typo - it was just an example.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Best,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2008 11:19:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Off Topic Rant: Man Up Or Shut Up</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/off_topic_rant_man_up_or_shut_up/#comment-21640703</link><description>@Patrick&lt;br&gt;Dude, don't be paranoid. I don't care what you use as a screen name. :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;@Shut up Stella&lt;br&gt;ROFLMAO! :-P&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thanks for the support, folks, it's truly appreciated.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 21:07:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Two New Star Trek Posters: Uhura And Nero</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/two_new_star_trek_posters_uhura_and_nero/#comment-21640692</link><description>The posters you're referring to showed partial faces and where in shades of color. When assembled they created a Starfleet insignia. :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thanks fr the kind words.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 30 Nov 2008 23:37:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Talking During A Movie? Say Allo To My Leetle Friend</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/talking_during_a_movie_say_allo_to_my_leetle_friend/#comment-21644082</link><description>@Ken J&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Exactly - so I would suggest the debate end as it's pointless.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 02 Jan 2009 00:04:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Talking During A Movie? Say Allo To My Leetle Friend</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/talking_during_a_movie_say_allo_to_my_leetle_friend/#comment-21644078</link><description>I *LOVE* Ted Nugent - dude is beyond awesome.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2009 18:08:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Talking During A Movie? Say Allo To My Leetle Friend</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/talking_during_a_movie_say_allo_to_my_leetle_friend/#comment-21644071</link><description>@ptfvr&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I honestly hope you don't think I was "jumping" on you with my comment. I'm just so sick to death of the whole "hunting" argument when it has nothing to do with the issue. :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And I agree that I hope it's never necessary. An AK certainly isn't the best weapon for home defense. 8-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2009 17:23:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Talking During A Movie? Say Allo To My Leetle Friend</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/talking_during_a_movie_say_allo_to_my_leetle_friend/#comment-21644069</link><description>@prtfvr&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;i&gt;"What kind of hunting are you going to do with that kind of weaponry?"&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;That is a specious argument as the second amendment has NOTHING to do with hunting. It's there for protection against others who would do us harm AND to protect us from our own government should it ever become necessary.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I understand the basis of year fear, but perhaps it would be better directed at psychotic, drug addicted people instead of guns. I'm sure if that person didn't have a gun it would have been a knife.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2009 17:03:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Talking During A Movie? Say Allo To My Leetle Friend</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/talking_during_a_movie_say_allo_to_my_leetle_friend/#comment-21644065</link><description>@greenknight&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I think really no one thinks that the shooting was the right answer, but that this speaks to the heart of the issue of people basically being inconsiderate jerks in movie theaters. Pretty much like the "release" one feels when the bad guy finally gets what's coming to him in a movie.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;As to you your gun arguments - thankfully I don't live in a state that puts onerous restrictions on having a gun in my home. I've educated my wife and daughter on the seriousness, responsibility and dangers of guns - and if someone breaks into my home I won't have to unlock a cabinet to get access to a weapon.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2009 04:28:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Talking During A Movie? Say Allo To My Leetle Friend</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/talking_during_a_movie_say_allo_to_my_leetle_friend/#comment-21644040</link><description>@Dan&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Dude... AWESOME story! :-P&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2008 22:54:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Talking During A Movie? Say Allo To My Leetle Friend</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/talking_during_a_movie_say_allo_to_my_leetle_friend/#comment-21644007</link><description>Actually it just occurred to me... instead of the weak public service messages that appear before movies - "Please don't talk/Turn off your cell phones," theaters could have something like:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;"You will be shot if you talk or use a cell phone during this film. Thank you - The Mgmt."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;8-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 28 Dec 2008 22:33:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Talking During A Movie? Say Allo To My Leetle Friend</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/talking_during_a_movie_say_allo_to_my_leetle_friend/#comment-21644006</link><description>@Bill C&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And what slays me is when really old folks talk during a movie - like retirement age. These are people who grew up before home video and during an era when it was understood that you don't talk during a movie.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 28 Dec 2008 22:31:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Talking During A Movie? Say Allo To My Leetle Friend</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/talking_during_a_movie_say_allo_to_my_leetle_friend/#comment-21644003</link><description>I would bet $100 that this guy does NOT have a concealed carry permit. Anyone who does understands that responsibilities and seriousness of what it means to "carry."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;What bugs the hell of out me is when I ask/tell someone to be quiet, and they look/talk to me indignantly, like I'm the one who's out of line.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 28 Dec 2008 22:22:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: New Star Trek Movie Takes Place In Alternate Timeline</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/new_star_trek_movie_takes_place_in_alternate_timeline/#comment-21642469</link><description>I'm actually wondering whether they address this alternate timeline business explicitly in the film.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 13 Dec 2008 11:26:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: New Star Trek Movie Takes Place In Alternate Timeline</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/new_star_trek_movie_takes_place_in_alternate_timeline/#comment-21642467</link><description>@Lank&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I'm pretty sure the Back to the Future reference was from the first film. :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 13 Dec 2008 11:00:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: New Star Trek Movie Takes Place In Alternate Timeline</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/new_star_trek_movie_takes_place_in_alternate_timeline/#comment-21642455</link><description>I really do think they're trying here - update it for new fans but not enrage existing fans too much.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Another bit of good news we didn't write up is that Majel Roddenberry will be reprising her role as the voice of the computer. If THAT doesn't make this feel like Star Trek, nothing will. :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2008 17:23:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Coming Soon: The Return Of &amp;#8216;Heroes&amp;#8217; Greatness</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/coming_soon_the_return_of_8216heroes8217_greatness/#comment-21642426</link><description>I think they're worth watching.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2008 15:17:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Day The Earth Stood Still Review</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/the_day_the_earth_stood_still_review/#comment-21642409</link><description>@gortbuddy&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;You may be right - but then where is the rest of the movie? The third act, where we see the reaction/fallout of this?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;That explanation doesn't "fix" the movie IMHO.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 14 Dec 2008 22:14:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Day The Earth Stood Still Review</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/the_day_the_earth_stood_still_review/#comment-21642407</link><description>Rob,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Whatever the reason (and I'm quit sure it's environmentalism considering when this film went into production) any logic that says the survival of the Earth is more important than humanity is utterly and completely stupid (or at least naive and/or nihilistic) IMHO.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 14 Dec 2008 16:38:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Day The Earth Stood Still Review</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/the_day_the_earth_stood_still_review/#comment-21642388</link><description>@greenknight&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;You can rest assured I'll post it up as soon as it's officially available online. I would guess that would be within the next few days.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2008 11:25:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Day The Earth Stood Still Review</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/the_day_the_earth_stood_still_review/#comment-21642385</link><description>@greenknight&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I saw the Wolverine trailer and I'm torn about what I think of it... the individual scenes looked good, but as a whole the trailer felt very disjointed to me.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Sure, trailers have a lot of different stuff in them but this one was kind of confusing the way it was put together. Doesn't really give much of an idea as to what the film will be about (besides the origin of Wolverine).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2008 09:34:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Dark Knight DVD/Blu-Ray Selling Like Hot Cakes</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/the_dark_knight_dvdblu_ray_selling_like_hot_cakes/#comment-21642366</link><description>Everyone tells me the same thing "get a PS3." But I didn't. I got a Panasonic Blu-Ray with excellent reviews for less than $200. I don't need to spend $350+ for a PS3 just to watch movies because I don't play video games.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I went with this one:&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://twurl.nl/eqogyc" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://twurl.nl/eqogyc&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Which I was able to pick up for under $200.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2008 19:02:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Dark Knight DVD/Blu-Ray Selling Like Hot Cakes</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/the_dark_knight_dvdblu_ray_selling_like_hot_cakes/#comment-21642348</link><description>I haven't seen it with my own eyes, but I understand that while you are correct and DVDs look MUCH better on a Blu-Ray player due to up-conversion, Blu-Ray discs still blow away even THAT picture.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I'll find out in a couple of weeks. :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2008 15:18:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Dark Knight DVD/Blu-Ray Selling Like Hot Cakes</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/the_dark_knight_dvdblu_ray_selling_like_hot_cakes/#comment-21642342</link><description>"Hot cakes cooked in bear grease or pork lard were popular from earliest times in America. First made of cornmeal, the griddle cakes or pancakes were of course best when served piping hot and were often sold at church benefits, fairs, and other functions. So popular were they that by the beginning of the 19th century 'to sell like hot cakes' was a familiar expression for anything that sold very quickly effortlessly, and in quantity." From "Encyclopedia of Word and Phrase Origins" by Robert Hendrickson (Facts on File, New York, 1997)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;:-P&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2008 13:53:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Dark Knight DVD/Blu-Ray Selling Like Hot Cakes</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/the_dark_knight_dvdblu_ray_selling_like_hot_cakes/#comment-21642333</link><description>@greenknight&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Nope, the "subsidiary" comment was just a joke - it's just little ol' me running this shop with the help of my boyz to write for you. :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2008 09:31:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Watchmen Comic-Con Footage AND New Trailer!</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/watchmen_comic_con_footage_and_new_trailer/#comment-21642274</link><description>@greenknight&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Gotta say, I, too have been amazed at the lack of excitement/discussion attached to our Watchmen posts!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2008 13:52:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Two New Star Trek Posters: Uhura And Nero</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/two_new_star_trek_posters_uhura_and_nero/#comment-21640680</link><description>EXCELLENT idea. Just shot off an email asking for some copies when they become available. :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 18:01:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: I&amp;#8217;m Captain Kirk!!!</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/i8217m_captain_kirk/#comment-21640675</link><description>@vitaboy&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;THANKS for that link! Gang, I highly recommend you head over and check out some of those remastered episodes - especially ones where there are a lot of exterior shots of the Enterprise and other ships. I love how they "cleaned up" the footage, but were completely faithful to the original - avoiding the temptation to update anything.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 23:59:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: I&amp;#8217;m Captain Kirk!!!</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/i8217m_captain_kirk/#comment-21640673</link><description>Have you guys seen the version of classic Trek with updated visual effects? It totally rocks and is worth seeking out on TV.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 16:42:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: I&amp;#8217;m Captain Kirk!!!</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/i8217m_captain_kirk/#comment-21640661</link><description>@G.K.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;You win the geek prize, sir! :-P&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It was titled "The Enemy Within."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 18:04:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A Big Pile Of New Movie Posters</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/a_big_pile_of_new_movie_posters/#comment-21640658</link><description>@Mr Insane&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;ROFLMAO!! Best analysis of Red Sonja I've seen yet. I couldn't have said it better myself. 8-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 14:24:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twilight Review</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/twilight_review/#comment-21640637</link><description>@Amy&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;My daughter is 12 and while she's not into the books she saw the movie with me and also wonders what the big deal is about Robert Pattinson. :-P&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 11:11:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twilight Review</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/twilight_review/#comment-21640575</link><description>@Tina&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Because I am the author of this review. :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 20:17:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twilight Review</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/twilight_review/#comment-21640573</link><description>@Kim&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I never said Bella moved to Washington on a "whim." Here's what I wrote:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;em&gt;"She is in sunny Arizona with her mom and new stepfather, and as they prepare for a long road trip she decides that she’d rather go up to Washington state to stay with her estranged father, Charlie (Billy Burke). He lives in the small town of Forks (population 3,000) and is the local sheriff."&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I didn't give the reason for the road trip but I did say that it was due to their trip that she decided to move.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 18:55:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twilight Review</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/twilight_review/#comment-21640543</link><description>@Kristina&lt;br&gt;Thanks, I've gone back through the review and tried to find any errors and correct them. If you still see any in there pleas let me know.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;@Sil&lt;br&gt;I think my review MAY have been influenced by the fact that I sat through the movie with an audience full of hardcore Twililght fans and their reactions. I didn't exactly give it a glowing endorsement, but it was better than I thought it would be going in.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 21:48:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Discuss: Smallville &amp;#8216;Doomsday&amp;#8217; Episode!</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/discuss_smallville_8216doomsday8217_episode/#comment-21640497</link><description>@Kel&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If you don't like the show fine, but you're drifting into "troll" territory with that last comment.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 16:59:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Discuss: Smallville &amp;#8216;Doomsday&amp;#8217; Episode!</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/discuss_smallville_8216doomsday8217_episode/#comment-21640493</link><description>For the record I have NO problem with Kristen Kreuk. What I did have a problem with was her character arc and the never-ending, nauseating back and forth between Lana and Clark year after year after year...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 11:51:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Discuss: Smallville &amp;#8216;Doomsday&amp;#8217; Episode!</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/discuss_smallville_8216doomsday8217_episode/#comment-21640491</link><description>@JP&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I think most of the complaints are about how the advertising implied that episode would have the big showdown, but left 95% of it for the next episode.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 10:22:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Discuss: Smallville &amp;#8216;Doomsday&amp;#8217; Episode!</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/discuss_smallville_8216doomsday8217_episode/#comment-21640481</link><description>@Dean&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I, too rolled my eyes and cringed when Lana appeared. I was also bummed that the whole Doomsday thing turned out to be more of a teaser. They had better deliver big time when the show returns in January.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I thought Doomsday was fine from what little we saw of him. Remember, this is "Smallville the TV series" not "Superman the comic book."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 10:55:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Discuss: Smallville &amp;#8216;Doomsday&amp;#8217; Episode!</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/discuss_smallville_8216doomsday8217_episode/#comment-21640477</link><description>Yeah, it took about 5 seconds for me to say "oh look, they're doing Cloverfield."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 20:36:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Discuss: Smallville &amp;#8216;Doomsday&amp;#8217; Episode!</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/discuss_smallville_8216doomsday8217_episode/#comment-21640467</link><description>I honestly just don't see how the glasses/spandex Superman will ever fit into the Smallville universe. Ever.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Even if there was some sort of cop-out mass Jor-El mind wipe of everyone in Metropolis and Smallville, does the show really strike you as one where a character puts on a pair of glasses and no one recognizes him?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It'll never work.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 14:22:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Discuss: Smallville &amp;#8216;Doomsday&amp;#8217; Episode!</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/discuss_smallville_8216doomsday8217_episode/#comment-21640459</link><description>Bah! I feel ripped off! I knew it would be a two-parter but I hoped for more tonight. And I didn't know we'd have to wait two MONTHS for the conclusion!?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Oh, and bloody Lana - if she can't throw a wrench in her relationship with Clark she had to return to throw one in between Clark and Lois - grrr. Just when I thought we were DONE with all that will they/won't they get together crapola that we had to put up with for 7 years.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I *did* like that Doomsday looked like in the comics, but what was up with that smile from Chloe in the final scene? Creepy...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 00:30:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Screen Rant Chimes In On The New Star Trek Footage</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/screen_rant_chimes_in_on_the_new_star_trek_footage/#comment-21640433</link><description>The one thing that has me concerned is what sounds like a really stupid scene - the one 790 referred to with the hands and tongue of Kirk swelling up. That's the first "Transformers-ish" thing (inject stupid comedy just for laffs) that I've heard about the film.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Here's hoping beyond hope this somehow turns out to be great.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Oh, and Rachel, it IS supposed to be the same ship.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 17:35:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Screen Rant Chimes In On The New Star Trek Footage</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/screen_rant_chimes_in_on_the_new_star_trek_footage/#comment-21640426</link><description>@Kahless&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Brian was referring to Spock calling Kirk "Jim," not Scotty.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 12:57:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Aaron Eckhart To Star In &amp;#8216;Battle: Los Angeles&amp;#8217;</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/aaron_eckhart_to_star_in_8216battle_los_angeles8217/#comment-21640364</link><description>Don't know why but this movie doesn't excite me at all.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 12:35:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: JCVD Review</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/jcvd_review/#comment-21640356</link><description>Looking forward to it as well, although it will probably have to be a rental for me.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 17:00:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Men, Don&amp;#8217;t Be Afraid Of &amp;#8216;Twilight&amp;#8217;</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/men_don8217t_be_afraid_of_8216twilight8217/#comment-21640341</link><description>Twilight review is up. 8-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 00:26:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Men, Don&amp;#8217;t Be Afraid Of &amp;#8216;Twilight&amp;#8217;</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/men_don8217t_be_afraid_of_8216twilight8217/#comment-21640334</link><description>@jimmy&lt;br&gt;Don't blame you. This is not a movie that a guy would normally go to without trying to score points with his girlfriend/wife. 8-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;@Dan&lt;br&gt;Tons, dude... tons.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 12:56:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Men, Don&amp;#8217;t Be Afraid Of &amp;#8216;Twilight&amp;#8217;</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/men_don8217t_be_afraid_of_8216twilight8217/#comment-21640331</link><description>Yes, it's cheesy, but there were things I liked about it. The point of my post is that it wasn't as painful to sit through as I had anticipated. I mean wild horses couldn't drag me to a Victorian-era love story movie and this was nowhere on that level.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I didn't say it was "Rambo." 8-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 12:31:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Men, Don&amp;#8217;t Be Afraid Of &amp;#8216;Twilight&amp;#8217;</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/men_don8217t_be_afraid_of_8216twilight8217/#comment-21640305</link><description>Well it wasn't GREAT, but it was far better than I has anticipated.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I have NO idea what this thing might do opening weekend... better minds than mine are having a hard time predicting it.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 01:28:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Discussion &amp;#8211; November 19, 2008</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/open_discussion_8211_november_19_2008/#comment-21640291</link><description>@INK&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thanks for pointing that out. I just upped the gravatar level on the site to "PG." However I still don't see Doom's avatar showing up. I think he needs to try using a jpeg file. That's the format for all that are showing, and I don't know what here on the site might not be allowing .png files to display.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 13:00:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Discussion &amp;#8211; November 19, 2008</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/open_discussion_8211_november_19_2008/#comment-21640289</link><description>@INK&lt;br&gt;AFAIK you log into &lt;a href="http://gravatar.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;gravatar.com&lt;/a&gt; using the same email you use for your "INK" commenting here.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;@Doom3524&lt;br&gt;I'm afraid I don't know what the issue is with your gravatar. When I look at your comment from the admin side, I can see that you have a custom avatar. Why it's not showing up on the live site I couldn't tell you. :-(&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;One idea... could you try replacing the .png image with a .jpg?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 12:34:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Discussion &amp;#8211; November 19, 2008</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/open_discussion_8211_november_19_2008/#comment-21640284</link><description>Hey Ink, you DID have an avatar! Why did you think you had to change your username?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 10:41:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Discussion &amp;#8211; November 19, 2008</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/open_discussion_8211_november_19_2008/#comment-21640280</link><description>LOL, Lance, I have to be invited back. 8-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 23:19:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Discussion &amp;#8211; November 19, 2008</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/open_discussion_8211_november_19_2008/#comment-21640275</link><description>Bigger avatars in place (looks better, thanks for the suggestion). I searched around and didn't find much on concerns with using gravatars.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;As far as the gravatars updating, I believe in can take a few minutes, plus the caching we use on the site might make it take a while to show up.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 16:55:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Discussion &amp;#8211; November 19, 2008</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/open_discussion_8211_november_19_2008/#comment-21640266</link><description>Avatars added, hope you guys like having that as a feature. :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 15:30:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Discussion &amp;#8211; November 19, 2008</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/open_discussion_8211_november_19_2008/#comment-21640265</link><description>Tomato, tomahto. :-) I think gravatars are kind of a brand name.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 13:59:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Discussion &amp;#8211; November 19, 2008</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/open_discussion_8211_november_19_2008/#comment-21640254</link><description>Just to give you an example of the comments format, you can go here:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.slashfilm.com/2008/11/18/alice-in-wonderland-not-being-shot-in-3d/" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.slashfilm.com/2008/11/18/alice-in-wo...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Although I'm getting a pretty clear signal. :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 11:35:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Discussion &amp;#8211; November 19, 2008</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/open_discussion_8211_november_19_2008/#comment-21640253</link><description>@Evie&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;While Niall here loved it (he gave it a great review) I *hated* the way the action scenes were shot. Bourne-style but far more incomprehensible with two camera cuts per second which were not fluid as far as guiding the viewer through the action.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 11:27:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: New Harry Potter 6 Trailer: Wacky Comedy &amp;amp; Cool Visuals</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/new_harry_potter_6_trailer_wacky_comedy_amp_cool_visuals/#comment-21640232</link><description>@pirateden&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;That stood out for me as well - in other trailers the movie looks extremely serious and dark, so seeing the slapstick bits above seemed really out of place.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 17:58:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: New Harry Potter 6 Trailer: Wacky Comedy &amp;amp; Cool Visuals</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/new_harry_potter_6_trailer_wacky_comedy_amp_cool_visuals/#comment-21640230</link><description>Generally speaking I tend to find that international trailers and posters are far better than the US versions.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 16:10:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Trek Geekery: Images Of New Star Trek Movie Details</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/trek_geekery_images_of_new_star_trek_movie_details/#comment-21640219</link><description>@Toastbutter&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I think it will be more "apples to apples" once the new Trek movie numbers are in. I assume your Batman number includes TDK box office.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 15:38:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Trek Geekery: Images Of New Star Trek Movie Details</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/trek_geekery_images_of_new_star_trek_movie_details/#comment-21640217</link><description>@Toastbutter&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thanks. I was going to chime in with The Dark Knight's one BILLION dollar box office receipts myself. 8-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 10:57:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Trek Geekery: Images Of New Star Trek Movie Details</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/trek_geekery_images_of_new_star_trek_movie_details/#comment-21640208</link><description>@flamestrike&lt;br&gt;I certainly understand your trepidation based on Orci/Kurtzman. I'm of the opinion that at this point almost ANYONE is better for the franchise than Berman &amp;amp; Braga.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I'm really trying to keep an open mind about this just out of love of Trek. Personally (and I've said this before) I think going back to the beginning and doing a "Batman Begins" style reboot is a great idea &lt;em&gt;if executed correctly&lt;/em&gt;.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I'll tell you the one thing I've heard that doesn't sit well with me at ALL: Pete over at /Film wrote that his impression of the "swelled hands/tounge" scene shown in the press preview was reminiscent of the scene where the Transformers hide in the back yard in that movie.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;That was one of the things I absolutely despised in Transformers and to hear ANY scene in the new Trek movie called "equivalent" to that makes me shudder...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 12:38:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Trek Geekery: Images Of New Star Trek Movie Details</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/trek_geekery_images_of_new_star_trek_movie_details/#comment-21640193</link><description>@Curt&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I agree - While I actually really like TNG when it was on, thinking back it was WAY to politically correct and substituted a lot of committee-think for decisive action.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;As to the white corriders - yes, we all know about the Star Wars thing... that's our POINT. :-P&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 10:34:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Trek Geekery: Images Of New Star Trek Movie Details</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/trek_geekery_images_of_new_star_trek_movie_details/#comment-21640188</link><description>@Lee-Unit&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Go to &lt;a href="http://startrekmovie.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://startrekmovie.com&lt;/a&gt; and then try hitting Ctrl-F5 to clear the page cache and reload it fully.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 01:19:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Trek Geekery: Images Of New Star Trek Movie Details</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/trek_geekery_images_of_new_star_trek_movie_details/#comment-21640182</link><description>@Shut up Stella&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Well, Paramount trusted Berman, Braga and crew despite the continuing decline of the franchise. Look at their reaction to Star Trek: Nemesis' pathetic box office: It was the fans' fault for not showing up.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It couldn't possibly be that they made a movie that sucked, now could it?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 18:37:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Trek Geekery: Images Of New Star Trek Movie Details</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/trek_geekery_images_of_new_star_trek_movie_details/#comment-21640179</link><description>Nimoy is playing future Spock.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 16:14:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Trek Geekery: Images Of New Star Trek Movie Details</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/trek_geekery_images_of_new_star_trek_movie_details/#comment-21640175</link><description>@Lee&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Hey, thanks bud - much appreciated. I just wish we had the resources to cover more movie news than we do.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 13:30:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Trek Geekery: Images Of New Star Trek Movie Details</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/trek_geekery_images_of_new_star_trek_movie_details/#comment-21640172</link><description>@vitaboy&lt;br&gt;&lt;em&gt;"The technobabble became the driving force for nearly all the stories. All the drama and character development orbited around the technobabble or technoconundrum of the week."&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Blame ST:TNG for that big time. Sure, TOS had a bit of it, but TNG ramped the technobabble factor up to an art form.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;@nowhereman&lt;br&gt;Thanks, my brutha. :-P&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;@Sebastian&lt;br&gt;Thank you as well and welcome! Always happy to have a new "regular" on the site! :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 10:25:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Trek Geekery: Images Of New Star Trek Movie Details</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/trek_geekery_images_of_new_star_trek_movie_details/#comment-21640159</link><description>It's not an "A," I noticed that as well.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 00:05:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Here It Is: The Official Full Star Trek Trailer</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/here_it_is_the_official_full_star_trek_trailer/#comment-21640149</link><description>Just for fun:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.imcaptainkirk.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;I'M CAPTAIN KIRK!!!"&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;:-P&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 14:43:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Here It Is: The Official Full Star Trek Trailer</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/here_it_is_the_official_full_star_trek_trailer/#comment-21640146</link><description>@Mat&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Hey, happy to have you contribute to the conversation, bud - just do it nicely. :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 18:23:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Here It Is: The Official Full Star Trek Trailer</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/here_it_is_the_official_full_star_trek_trailer/#comment-21640144</link><description>@Mat D&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;No need to be insulting to fans that have kept the franchise alive for decades - without whom there wouldn't BE a new Star Trek movie.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 17:31:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Jaden Smith Is The New Karate Kid</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/jaden_smith_is_the_new_karate_kid/#comment-21639500</link><description>@Helen&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;That's a pretty spammy post but I'm going to let it slide because I agree that Will Smith does seem to be a good dad. 8-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 10:55:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Jaden Smith Is The New Karate Kid</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/jaden_smith_is_the_new_karate_kid/#comment-21639497</link><description>Kofi,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It's not "classic" in the Citizen Kane type of way, but it is in the same way as other movies we remember fondly from the 80s.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2008 21:50:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Veteran&amp;#8217;s Day: 16 Of The Best World War II Movies</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/veteran8217s_day_16_of_the_best_world_war_ii_movies/#comment-21639486</link><description>@Paul&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thanks for adding a bunch of great movies to the list.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2008 10:29:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Veteran&amp;#8217;s Day: 16 Of The Best World War II Movies</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/veteran8217s_day_16_of_the_best_world_war_ii_movies/#comment-21639461</link><description>@dave fernandes&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Well said. I should never have brought the Digg thing up.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2008 11:21:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Veteran&amp;#8217;s Day: 16 Of The Best World War II Movies</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/veteran8217s_day_16_of_the_best_world_war_ii_movies/#comment-21639458</link><description>Digg "regulars" are notoriously Left/Liberal/Atheist for the vast majority.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2008 00:40:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Veteran&amp;#8217;s Day: 16 Of The Best World War II Movies</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/veteran8217s_day_16_of_the_best_world_war_ii_movies/#comment-21639451</link><description>@Flyboy&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Hmm... thanks, I must have misread IMDB. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Fixed.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 13:45:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Veteran&amp;#8217;s Day: 16 Of The Best World War II Movies</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/veteran8217s_day_16_of_the_best_world_war_ii_movies/#comment-21639448</link><description>Thanks, guys - great stuff. Oh and of course over at Digg at least ONE person had to say this list was "too pro-American." :-P&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 11:02:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Veteran&amp;#8217;s Day: 16 Of The Best World War II Movies</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/veteran8217s_day_16_of_the_best_world_war_ii_movies/#comment-21639441</link><description>@Kayla&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Doh! Thanks for the correction - fixed.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2008 22:29:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Captain America Gets A Director</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/captain_america_gets_a_director/#comment-21639410</link><description>I think the guy who plays Nathan Petrelli might work as Cap if his hair was dyed blonde.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 01:22:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: New Footage From Terminator: Salvation!</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/new_footage_from_terminator_salvation/#comment-21639366</link><description>Hmm... I wonder if they took it offline.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;This is why I *hate* putting up videos hosted elsewhere and I prefer to host them here on the site.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2008 00:20:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: New Footage From Terminator: Salvation!</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/new_footage_from_terminator_salvation/#comment-21639357</link><description>Old? This featurette was just released today AFAIK.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Please show me a link to where it appeared on the web more than a couple of days ago.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 09 Nov 2008 18:16:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Obama: The Second Black U.S. President</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/obama_the_second_black_us_president/#comment-21639313</link><description>I thought 24 was great up until the last season, where it lost its mojo.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 08 Nov 2008 23:21:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Discussion &amp;#8211; December 03, 2008</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/open_discussion_8211_december_03_2008/#comment-21641384</link><description>Bloody hell... I think the email issue may not yet be fully resolved. :-(&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 18:53:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Discussion &amp;#8211; December 03, 2008</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/open_discussion_8211_december_03_2008/#comment-21641380</link><description>Oh man, GREAT news! Thanks for letting me know, guys! :-D&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 10:24:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Discussion &amp;#8211; December 03, 2008</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/open_discussion_8211_december_03_2008/#comment-21641375</link><description>@Ken J&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Is the site doing that again? Next time it does, could you note what ad appears at the top of the page? Maybe I can narrow down what's causing that.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 19:10:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Discussion &amp;#8211; December 03, 2008</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/open_discussion_8211_december_03_2008/#comment-21641362</link><description>Hey folks,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Be aware I've just made a change to the subscribe to comments feature. By default the box is now NOT checked, so if you want to subscribe to a post you'll have to check the box before commenting.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Still working on the Yahoo email issue.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thanks,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 11:55:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Discussion &amp;#8211; December 03, 2008</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/open_discussion_8211_december_03_2008/#comment-21641361</link><description>@Oscar&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Unfortunately I'm not on any pre-screening lists for PWZ so I'll have to go see it when I have a chance. Busy weekend, don't know if I'll get the opportunity. But I *do* want to review it.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 11:48:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Discussion &amp;#8211; December 03, 2008</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/open_discussion_8211_december_03_2008/#comment-21641357</link><description>@Shut up Stella!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I'm no expert but I do believe that release date makes a difference. It can sway people who were on the fence about seeing a movie one way or the other, and movies do get more multiple viewings in the summer than the do in the middle of winter, I would think.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 11:01:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Update On Superman Appearance In &amp;#8216;Green Lantern&amp;#8217;</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/update_on_superman_appearance_in_8216green_lantern8217/#comment-21641311</link><description>Welling is not the reason that Smallville has been, um, less than good over the years. Separate him from the cheesy teenage soap opera aspect of the series and let him stand alone in his portrayal of Clark Kent (especially this season) and I think he'd make a great Superman.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Not that there's a snowball's chance in hell that will happen...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 16:30:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: MakeFive Votes Screen Rant Their Top Entertainment Blog</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/makefive_votes_screen_rant_their_top_entertainment_blog/#comment-21641289</link><description>Yeah, go figure. 8-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 20:13:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Kevin McKidd Still In The Running For Thor</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/kevin_mckidd_still_in_the_running_for_thor/#comment-21641269</link><description>@Carl&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;No worries. I know you certainly didn't intend to mislead - you just extrapolated the Blake thing from what they said. :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 03:10:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Kevin McKidd Still In The Running For Thor</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/kevin_mckidd_still_in_the_running_for_thor/#comment-21641259</link><description>@Dr Donald Blake&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;You may very well be right:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://screenrant.com/kenneth-branagh-direct-thor-vic-3825/" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://screenrant.com/kenneth-branagh-direct-th...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 17:57:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Kevin McKidd Still In The Running For Thor</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/kevin_mckidd_still_in_the_running_for_thor/#comment-21641254</link><description>@Dr. Donald Blake&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;There was no intention to mislead. I actually didn't catch that nuance so thanks for pointing it out. Carl (the writer) should have been more careful because you are indeed correct. I've edited the post above to more accurately reflect the source article.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Having said that, do you think they would cast two different actors for the two roles?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thanks,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 17:10:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Can The Person Who Wants &amp;#8216;Speed 3&amp;#8242; Please Stand Up!</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/can_the_person_who_wants_8216speed_38242_please_stand_up/#comment-21641240</link><description>@Metallicat79&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;No.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;8-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 17:05:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Weekend Movie News Wrap Up: November 30, 2008</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/weekend_movie_news_wrap_up_november_30_2008/#comment-21641237</link><description>@Ken J&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I commented on this in today's Open Discussion post. Yahoo is banning emails sent from my server so it's not you. I'm working on getting the situation resolved.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 11:02:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Weekend Movie News Wrap Up: November 30, 2008</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/weekend_movie_news_wrap_up_november_30_2008/#comment-21641233</link><description>@Ken J&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I subbed to this post and I just received an email update when John added his comment.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 12:55:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Weekend Movie News Wrap Up: November 30, 2008</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/weekend_movie_news_wrap_up_november_30_2008/#comment-21641230</link><description>Is anyone else having problems with receiving comment emails?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 09:40:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A Better Look At The USS Kelvin From &amp;#8216;Star Trek&amp;#8217;</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/a_better_look_at_the_uss_kelvin_from_8216star_trek8217/#comment-21641155</link><description>@Steve&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Oh my gosh! You're right... the Trek and I Love Lucy themes ARE incredibly similar, lol! :-P&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 17:43:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A Better Look At The USS Kelvin From &amp;#8216;Star Trek&amp;#8217;</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/a_better_look_at_the_uss_kelvin_from_8216star_trek8217/#comment-21641150</link><description>I may be mistaken in stating that Pike is the Captain of that ship.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 29 Nov 2008 14:46:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Loads Of New Pics From Punisher: War Zone</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/loads_of_new_pics_from_punisher_war_zone/#comment-21641123</link><description>The overuse of primary colors (reds, blues) in every image and trailer I've seen from this just strikes me as really, really odd...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Fingers crossed it'll be good but I'm not very optimistic.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 28 Nov 2008 15:05:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Discussion &amp;#8211; November 26, 2008</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/open_discussion_8211_november_26_2008/#comment-21641102</link><description>Yes Man DOES look very similar to Liar Liar, however I'm looking forward to seeing Jim Carrey actually do comedy again for a change. :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 09:41:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Discussion &amp;#8211; November 26, 2008</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/open_discussion_8211_november_26_2008/#comment-21641096</link><description>Happy Thanksgiving to all of you as well and thanks for being a part of our Screen Rant "family." :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 27 Nov 2008 13:55:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Discussion &amp;#8211; November 26, 2008</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/open_discussion_8211_november_26_2008/#comment-21641088</link><description>@Ash Ali&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Those could very well BOTH be corriders on the Enterprise. I've read that different levels of the ship have completely different looks - with things getting more "industrial" as you go deeper into the engineering sections.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 16:50:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Discussion &amp;#8211; November 26, 2008</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/open_discussion_8211_november_26_2008/#comment-21641086</link><description>@Lawrence&lt;br&gt;Thanks for the update on the Watchmen site.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;@Metallicat79&lt;br&gt;Yeah, I thought this season got off to a great start but it does seem to be wandering a bit lately. And Ellison digging up Cromartie seemed REALLY dumb to me.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 14:31:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Hugh Jackman Talks Wolverine Movie (Plus A New Pic!)</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/hugh_jackman_talks_wolverine_movie_plus_a_new_pic/#comment-21641061</link><description>Jackman being tall doesn't bug me a bit. As was stated above, this is the "movie" Wolverine just as we had the "movie" Iron Man, Batman, etc.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 14:37:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Hugh Jackman Talks Wolverine Movie (Plus A New Pic!)</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/hugh_jackman_talks_wolverine_movie_plus_a_new_pic/#comment-21641056</link><description>Unfortunately I doubt they'd have the balls to make this rated R, which would make it a way better film IMHO.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Nothing like slicing people with razor sharp claws and having no blood appear. Maybe they have lasers built in and cauterize wounds as they create them. 8-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 11:08:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Stallone Says Dolph Lundgren Is Expendable</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/stallone_says_dolph_lundgren_is_expendable/#comment-21641032</link><description>This does indeed sound like it could be a pretty wicked cool movie.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 10:37:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Death Of Batman? Seriously?</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/the_death_of_batman_seriously/#comment-21641014</link><description>I'll wait for the TPB and then read this in one sitting. I'm absolutely sure that Bruce Wayne will be back.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 10:27:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Death Of Batman? Seriously?</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/the_death_of_batman_seriously/#comment-21641008</link><description>@D&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I certainly hope so. I hope DC isn't idiotic enough to kill off one of the foundational characters of its universe.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I still believe Steve Rogers will return to the Marvel Universe at some point...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 29 Nov 2008 22:03:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Death Of Batman? Seriously?</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/the_death_of_batman_seriously/#comment-21641006</link><description>@Ronnie&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;There's no reason to be calling people morons.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If you want to continue commenting here you'd better trim that sort of thing.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 29 Nov 2008 14:51:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Death Of Batman? Seriously?</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/the_death_of_batman_seriously/#comment-21641002</link><description>@michael&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Oh, sorry, bro... didn't mean to jump on you like that. Couldn't tell. That's why i use smileys extensively. :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 27 Nov 2008 21:13:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Death Of Batman? Seriously?</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/the_death_of_batman_seriously/#comment-21641000</link><description>Uh Michael, this is a movie news site and since we cover superhero movies so much we thought it would be relevant to bring it up just as the pivotal issue is being released.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Just because YOU'VE known about it for months doesn't mean everyone has.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 27 Nov 2008 20:52:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Death Of Batman? Seriously?</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/the_death_of_batman_seriously/#comment-21640986</link><description>@nig&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Hey bud, I *love* getting honest feedback! :-) I just thought this was enough of a major event to cover here since one of the main thrusts of Screen Rant is to cover superhero movies. From well over two thousand posts on the site you'll probably find no more than 10 off topic posts.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And trust me, there will be NO branching out to cars, chicks or otherwise here at SR. 8-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;As to this death of Batman thing - I think I'll wait for the trade paperback.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 10:35:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Awesome Terminator Salvation Poster</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/awesome_terminator_salvation_poster_12/#comment-21640948</link><description>@Jon&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I saw the footage at Comic-Con and granted it's hard to say an entire movie is going to be great from a few minutes of footage - however the "vibe" and the look felt right to me. This is NO "Charlie's Angels."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 14:40:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: TV &amp;amp; Movie Marketing Prediction: In Your Face</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/tv_amp_movie_marketing_prediction_in_your_face/#comment-21640898</link><description>@Bruce&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Yeah, well remember back in the day when all they had prior to movie trailers at the theater was a blank screen? You'd think the masses would have risen up when they started showing commercials before a movie starts after dropping $7-9 on a movie ticket - but no... the sheeple did nothing.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;There won't be any outrage or backlash once it begins on TV, either.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 10:13:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: TV &amp;amp; Movie Marketing Prediction: In Your Face</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/tv_amp_movie_marketing_prediction_in_your_face/#comment-21640896</link><description>@maverick&lt;br&gt;Ah, but that's EXACTLY how they determine ratings. AFAIK right now they don't even take time-shifted viewings into consideration even though that can be easily tracked.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 23:59:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: TV &amp;amp; Movie Marketing Prediction: In Your Face</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/tv_amp_movie_marketing_prediction_in_your_face/#comment-21640894</link><description>Yup, another great primer, gathering of facts from Bruce, our resident researcher. :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Things do indeed need to change with the advent and increasing popularity of DVRs. Advertisers will find ever more creative ways to intrude on our TV watching/Movie going experience.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;You'd think paying $80/month for cable and $9 to go see a movie would be plenty to finance what we watch on the small and big screen. 8-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 23:05:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 24: Redemption &amp;#8211; Day 7 Prequel Gets Some Fresh Air</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/24_redemption_8211_day_7_prequel_gets_some_fresh_air/#comment-21640845</link><description>So far it looks like season 7 is making up for the "jump the shark" vibe of season 6. I have a love/hate relationship with this show: I love how intense and engaging it is, but the situations and characters on the show sometimes raise my blood pressure sky high. :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 27 Nov 2008 14:07:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: New Watchmen Trailer With Quantum Of Solace</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/new_watchmen_trailer_with_quantum_of_solace/#comment-21639301</link><description>Actually I won't be seeing it until Friday morning as it turns out. My company is taking its employees to an early morning show on Friday so I figured why drive 90 miles round trip to see it the night before. :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2008 13:20:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: New Watchmen Trailer With Quantum Of Solace</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/new_watchmen_trailer_with_quantum_of_solace/#comment-21639299</link><description>Damn... at the time I wrote this post I had forgotten that the new Star Trek trailer will ALSO be attached to QoS! Trailer heaven followed by hopefully a kick-ass Bond film.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 08 Nov 2008 23:29:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Final Trailer For Disney&amp;#8217;s Bolt</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/final_trailer_for_disney8217s_bolt/#comment-21639283</link><description>Yup. This should do VERY well with families. If you can believe it, Madagascar 2 is projected to make well over $50MM this weekend!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 17:34:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Official (And Very Funny) Monsters vs. Aliens Trailer</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/official_and_very_funny_monsters_vs_aliens_trailer/#comment-21639276</link><description>That was VERY cute and funny - almost reminded me of Monsters Inc. quality.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 23:11:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: November Watchmen Video Journal: Girls Kick Ass</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/november_watchmen_video_journal_girls_kick_ass/#comment-21639273</link><description>Thanks, Lawrence - I just posted something up. :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 18:37:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: November Watchmen Video Journal: Girls Kick Ass</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/november_watchmen_video_journal_girls_kick_ass/#comment-21639267</link><description>That IS the risk with all this coverage and the video journals - by the time the movie arrive a lot of the magic has gone out of it.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 23:13:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Transformers 2 Has Wrapped &amp;#8211; Plus: Possible Spoilers</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/transformers_2_has_wrapped_8211_plus_possible_spoilers/#comment-21639246</link><description>@Rob&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I hated the action scenes. I couldn't even tell what the heck was going on with sweeping, extreme closeups of such insanely complex robots. At certain points I actually had to turn away from the screen from visual overload - I imagined the film triggering epileptic seizures.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;You should read my review. 8-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://screenrant.com/review-transformers-vic-791/" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://screenrant.com/review-transformers-vic-791/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 11:50:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Transformers 2 Has Wrapped &amp;#8211; Plus: Possible Spoilers</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/transformers_2_has_wrapped_8211_plus_possible_spoilers/#comment-21639242</link><description>@Jim Dandy&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Rob is definitely the exception here on Screen Rant in his opinion of Transformers. :-P&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;As for me, the ONLY reason I plan on seeing the sequel is so I can give it a "proper" review. If it's significantly different from the previous one in a good way, it'll get a good review from me.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But I'm not holding my breath.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 10:02:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Transformers 2 Has Wrapped &amp;#8211; Plus: Possible Spoilers</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/transformers_2_has_wrapped_8211_plus_possible_spoilers/#comment-21639237</link><description>I would say hatred of the first Transformers movie is the glue that binds Screen Rant together. :-P&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 23:14:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Will Smith Stars In &amp;#8216;7 Pounds&amp;#8217; Movie</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/will_smith_stars_in_82167_pounds8217_movie/#comment-21639211</link><description>I would tend to agree with Diana - that IS funny. :-P&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2009 11:26:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Will Smith Stars In &amp;#8216;7 Pounds&amp;#8217; Movie</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/will_smith_stars_in_82167_pounds8217_movie/#comment-21639193</link><description>@larry&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I would assume 2008.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2009 16:53:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Will Smith Stars In &amp;#8216;7 Pounds&amp;#8217; Movie</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/will_smith_stars_in_82167_pounds8217_movie/#comment-21639189</link><description>I'm pretty sure the reference is Shakespearean as someone mentioned above.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2008 23:39:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Will Smith Stars In &amp;#8216;7 Pounds&amp;#8217; Movie</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/will_smith_stars_in_82167_pounds8217_movie/#comment-21639178</link><description>@Dennis&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I believe it refers to the Shakespeare play "The Merchant of Venice" where bankers wanted to extract a "pound of flesh" from those who owed them money. In other words, no matter how hard it was on the person who owed the money, they wanted to be paid regardless.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And since Will Smith wanted to pay back for seven people, then you have seven pounds of flesh.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 28 Dec 2008 10:51:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Ultimate Geek Movie: &amp;#8216;Fanboys&amp;#8217; Trailer And Poster</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/ultimate_geek_movie_8216fanboys8217_trailer_and_poster/#comment-21639134</link><description>I had multiple opportunities to see this but never did. Not sure why not or why I haven't covered it here on the site... guess I figured it was getting plenty of coverage elsewhere.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It DOES look funny. :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 14:12:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Discussion &amp;#8211; November 5, 2008</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/open_discussion_8211_november_5_2008/#comment-21639115</link><description>@greenknight&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;All of your posts have gone through. Didn't see any in the spam filter and I haven't deleted any.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 08 Nov 2008 12:28:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Discussion &amp;#8211; November 5, 2008</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/open_discussion_8211_november_5_2008/#comment-21639105</link><description>@greenknight&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Sour grapes? You couldn't be more wrong. Don't presume to know what goes on in my head.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 09:57:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Discussion &amp;#8211; November 5, 2008</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/open_discussion_8211_november_5_2008/#comment-21639090</link><description>@Andy&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Haven't heard about any forward movement on that in almost a year:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://screenrant.com/tag/jurassic-park-4/" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://screenrant.com/tag/jurassic-park-4/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 18:45:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Discussion &amp;#8211; November 5, 2008</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/open_discussion_8211_november_5_2008/#comment-21639085</link><description>@Andy&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Yeah, you're right. I broke my own rule - sorry.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Let's get back to movies!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 13:23:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Discussion &amp;#8211; November 5, 2008</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/open_discussion_8211_november_5_2008/#comment-21639078</link><description>@greenknight&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Took me a while to decide whether to delete your comment or respond to it. I really don't like getting into political discussions here.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;You and half the country may have gotten sucked into Obama's "cult of personality/rock star" image, but I haven't. He was elected via an insane amount of money being raised and someone finally applying 21st century marketing techniques online and in traditional media to a presidential campaign. That and playing off the hatred for the Bush administration (as you so aptly demonstrated).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;With a combination of him as President along with a majority in the House and Senate led by the likes of Charles the-first-amendment-only-applies-if-you-agree-with-me Schumer, Nancy Pelosi and Barney there's-nothing-wrong-with-Fannie-Mae Frank - I'm terrified of what's going to happen to this country.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I don't see how people can set aside the common sense fact that who you associate and ally yourself with speaks volumes about who you are and what you believe. Any parent of a teenager should be familiar with this basic concept. And the pass he's gotten on how little experience he has is astounding to me.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;As a churchgoer (I would say a large percentage of Obama supporters aren't) I understand the significance of his attending a church for 20 years led by Jeremiah Wright, who espoused a radical black, anti-white agenda (BTW, I understand Oprah also attends this church). No one bats an eye at his leaving the church ONLY when it became politically expedient, when only weeks prior to that he said he could no more disown Wright "than his own grandmother."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;There are I'm sure plenty of other churches in his neighborhood and if he was offended by Wright's views he could have left. Implicitly, he agreed. If I attended a church and the pastor started spewing white supremacist crap I'd be out the door so fast it would make his head spin.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Simple.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Of course that's just one of the people he's allied himself with who have shall we say questionable worldviews.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Don't mind me though, I'll just be sitting here "clinging to my guns and religion" since I'm just a poor, ignorant hateful soul.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;ANY time a leader is raised to "icon" (or in this case, messianic) status I get very, very worried.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 10:23:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Discussion &amp;#8211; November 5, 2008</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/open_discussion_8211_november_5_2008/#comment-21639063</link><description>@Evie&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Well heck, the next time you notice something like that (big movie site update) drop us a line so we can let others know. :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 18:20:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Discussion &amp;#8211; November 5, 2008</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/open_discussion_8211_november_5_2008/#comment-21639055</link><description>@Lawrence&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;LOL, no inside scoops, sorry. Glad to hear you're interested in the film, though. The lack of comments on any Watchmen posts we write here is a bit disconcerting to me.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 14:25:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: New Photos From &amp;#8216;The Road&amp;#8217;</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/new_photos_from_8216the_road8217/#comment-21639039</link><description>Just things I've heard about the story in general.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 22:59:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: New Photos From &amp;#8216;The Road&amp;#8217;</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/new_photos_from_8216the_road8217/#comment-21639037</link><description>This looks like one of those movies that you need a strong stomach to sit through. Not specifically due to gore but due to how bleak it seems it will be.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Never read the book but I get the feeling it doesn't have a happy ending.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 16:44:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Brandon Routh Talks Sense About A &amp;#8216;Dark&amp;#8217; Superman</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/brandon_routh_talks_sense_about_a_8216dark8217_superman/#comment-21639032</link><description>@Othoniel&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;There isn't much happening on the Superman movie but as far as I know they still want Routh for it. I doubt there is much our little site could do to influence any decision either way.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2009 10:31:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Brandon Routh Talks Sense About A &amp;#8216;Dark&amp;#8217; Superman</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/brandon_routh_talks_sense_about_a_8216dark8217_superman/#comment-21639020</link><description>To me, doing a reboot and keeping the same actor is an oxymoron.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 11:04:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Brandon Routh Talks Sense About A &amp;#8216;Dark&amp;#8217; Superman</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/brandon_routh_talks_sense_about_a_8216dark8217_superman/#comment-21638980</link><description>I didn't really like him either, but that may have been more a function of the story than him personally. I really wish there would be a Superman movie cast with a granite-jawed, imposing actor like what you see in Neil Adams drawings or Alex Ross paintings.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 17:51:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: &amp;#8216;Heroes&amp;#8217; In Trouble: Two Producers Fired</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/8216heroes8217_in_trouble_two_producers_fired/#comment-21638970</link><description>@G Duffy&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If it is renewed it may go to a more compartmentalized format instead of one huge story arc that lasts an entire season (or three).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 21:14:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: &amp;#8216;Heroes&amp;#8217; In Trouble: Two Producers Fired</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/8216heroes8217_in_trouble_two_producers_fired/#comment-21638962</link><description>@David&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;You're joking, right?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2008 10:27:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: &amp;#8216;Heroes&amp;#8217; In Trouble: Two Producers Fired</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/8216heroes8217_in_trouble_two_producers_fired/#comment-21638922</link><description>@Sean&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Indeed... that is a great question. I DVR *everything* and although those stats are tracked somewhere, they are not taken into consideration when it comes to "ratings." Of course that is partially valid since the whole point of ratings is to determine how many eyeballs are being put on TV commercials and DVR users skip those.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2008 09:38:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Weekend Movie News Wrap Up: November 2, 2008</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/weekend_movie_news_wrap_up_november_2_2008/#comment-21638895</link><description>Regarding Zack &amp;amp; Miri: IMHO only people who run/write for movie websites and those who are regular readers are "shocked" at how poorly the film did this weekend.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;There's a difference between an "adult" comedy (Forgetting Sarah Marshall) and one where the main plot point it about making a porn movie. Outside of urban centers on either coast, I'd say people just don't care to see something like that (at the theater at least... maybe it'll do better on DVD).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 02 Nov 2008 11:52:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Here&amp;#8217;s Why Terrence Howard Isn&amp;#8217;t In Iron Man 2</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/here8217s_why_terrence_howard_isn8217t_in_iron_man_2/#comment-21638885</link><description>Robert Downey Jr. isn't exactly a big man. I'm 5'10" and when I met him he was shorter than me.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2008 00:19:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Here&amp;#8217;s Why Terrence Howard Isn&amp;#8217;t In Iron Man 2</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/here8217s_why_terrence_howard_isn8217t_in_iron_man_2/#comment-21638871</link><description>Found it online, it's been floating around so long that I don't know where it first appeared.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 01 Nov 2008 15:12:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Quantum Of Solace Review</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/quantum_of_solace_review/#comment-21638853</link><description>See now here's the problem with letting people other than me review movies for Screen Rant: I would have given this a MUCH lower score. I despised the hyper-quick-cut edits.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The action sequences actually made me angry because I *wanted* to be able to see what was happening but simply could not take in the "big picture" due to the uber-close ups and camera angle change (literally) every half second.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I was actually RELIEVED when there was no action on the screen. I also didn't think too much of the overall plot - the more I think about it the more I think it was very basic and too thin to carry the film.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;My review would have been very different indeed - I'm debating whether I should bother writing one. Don't want to confuse people with two reviews of the same film on the site.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 23:16:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Quantum Of Solace Review</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/quantum_of_solace_review/#comment-21638850</link><description>@Henry&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;That's been the major complaint I've heard about the movie: Too much action, not enough story/character development.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 20:32:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Quantum Of Solace Review</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/quantum_of_solace_review/#comment-21638847</link><description>@790&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I cleaned up your comment just a bit. FYI, this post made the front page of Digg, and Diggers are not known for being the nicest people on the planet.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Think AICN "talkbackers" but with less cursing. :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2008 09:41:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Quantum Of Solace Review</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/quantum_of_solace_review/#comment-21638845</link><description>@DrRock&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Yet you managed to scroll all the way down to the bottom of the page in order to leave a nasty comment.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Atta-boy!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2008 00:57:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Quantum Of Solace Review</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/quantum_of_solace_review/#comment-21638830</link><description>1. Connery&lt;br&gt;2. Craig&lt;br&gt;3. Moore&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;:-P</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 02 Nov 2008 00:27:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: &amp;#8216;Lost&amp;#8217; To Disappear Before It Jumps The Shark?</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/8216lost8217_to_disappear_before_it_jumps_the_shark/#comment-21638817</link><description>Stargate SG-1 was great all the way through the season where Richard Dean Anderson was still on the show full time. I think that was season... 8?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 01 Nov 2008 14:58:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: &amp;#8216;Lost&amp;#8217; To Disappear Before It Jumps The Shark?</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/8216lost8217_to_disappear_before_it_jumps_the_shark/#comment-21638810</link><description>@Mantis&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Cut the writer just a little slack - it's his first post here at Screen Rant. :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 19:33:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Happy Halloween!</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/happy_halloween/#comment-21638802</link><description>Hey Rampage thanks for commenting. At least YOU appreciated this. Maybe I'll skip it next year. :-P&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 01 Nov 2008 21:14:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: SR Picks: Iron Man Classic Comiquette</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/sr_picks_iron_man_classic_comiquette/#comment-21638786</link><description>They actually de-powered the armor over the last few years in the comics. The idea was that it was a fabric-like micro-tile mesh held in place by magnetic fields. Almost like a nano-tech, so it could be very thin.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And, yes, I noticed the eyes. :-) In the old suit he just looked out through the eye slits.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 01 Nov 2008 01:43:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: SR Picks: Iron Man Classic Comiquette</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/sr_picks_iron_man_classic_comiquette/#comment-21638780</link><description>Uh, guys... that's how the armor USED to be in the comics.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 10:33:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Mid-Week Movie News Wrap Up &amp;#8211; Oct. 30, 2008</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/mid_week_movie_news_wrap_up_8211_oct_30_2008/#comment-21638766</link><description>Pretty soon they'll be able to do "American Pie: The Next Generation."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 21:44:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Watch &amp;#8216;Midnight Meat Train&amp;#8217; Online For Free!</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/watch_8216midnight_meat_train8217_online_for_free/#comment-21638757</link><description>@Steven&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Man, that is SO annoying! Sorry to hear it. :-(&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 17:04:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Sigh&amp;#8230; Mark Millar Talks Superman. Again.</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/sigh8230_mark_millar_talks_superman_again/#comment-21638742</link><description>Actually Marvel Comics has a series of comics it puts out from time to time called "The End." They take a character or team and portray how their superhero career will end.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I haven't read them all, but the first one, about the Hulk was fantastic. There's one coming out this month for the end of Iron Man.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 02 Nov 2008 10:36:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Sigh&amp;#8230; Mark Millar Talks Superman. Again.</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/sigh8230_mark_millar_talks_superman_again/#comment-21638740</link><description>Zipper,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Blame me for that, not Jamie. If it was up to him he wouldn't give Millar any press - but everyone was talking about this and I felt we should put in our 2 cents.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 01 Nov 2008 01:41:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Sigh&amp;#8230; Mark Millar Talks Superman. Again.</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/sigh8230_mark_millar_talks_superman_again/#comment-21638727</link><description>I seriously doubt that WB would go with such an unconventional (albeit epic) story for future Superman movies.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 14:06:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Gort Is Angry In New 5-Minute Trailer</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/gort_is_angry_in_new_5_minute_trailer/#comment-21638717</link><description>@karen&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If a studio takes it upon itself to remake a beloved classic it needs to be taken seriously IMHO.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 08 Nov 2008 12:31:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: My Bloody Valentine Poster = Everything I Hate About 3D</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/my_bloody_valentine_poster_everything_i_hate_about_3d/#comment-21638069</link><description>Ken,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I wrote that post and read through the comments and have NO idea where you're getting the inference that 3D makes a bad movie better or that removing 3D from a movie makes it better.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;NO one has said anything of the sort, so what's your beef?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;All I said is that I think used in a subtle way, 3D can enhance the moviegoing &lt;em&gt;experience&lt;/em&gt;.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 25 Oct 2008 12:46:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: New (Awesome) Watchmen Trailer And Poster</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/new_awesome_watchmen_trailer_and_poster/#comment-21638051</link><description>Updated this with a much higher quality version of the trailer. :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 20:32:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: New (Awesome) Watchmen Trailer And Poster</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/new_awesome_watchmen_trailer_and_poster/#comment-21638050</link><description>@Gary&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Please either clean up your email inbox (it seems to be full) or CHANGE the address you're using for commenting here. I'm tired of receiving bounced email messages from your account.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 12:02:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Incredible Hulk Sequel Is A Long Ways Away</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/incredible_hulk_sequel_is_a_long_ways_away/#comment-21638025</link><description>@Sabin&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;As we wrote above, she confirms in that interview that any solo movie will not most likely happen until AFTER the Avengers movie.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2008 17:53:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Discussion &amp;#8211; October 22, 2008</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/open_discussion_8211_october_22_2008/#comment-21637996</link><description>@GARY&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Dude, I'm not going to ask you this again, either provide an email address when commenting that is functional, or if your mailbox is full PLEASE CLEAN IT UP.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I'm done receiving dozens of bounced email posts from comment threads that you're following!!!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 21:31:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Discussion &amp;#8211; October 22, 2008</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/open_discussion_8211_october_22_2008/#comment-21637986</link><description>Ken,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Maybe most critics don't have daughters in the age range of the film nor do they get fired up at the reality of the situation it portrays.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 26 Oct 2008 10:35:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Discussion &amp;#8211; October 22, 2008</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/open_discussion_8211_october_22_2008/#comment-21637980</link><description>Damn... just watched "Trade" starring Kevin Kline. As the father of a 12 yo daughter that was a HARD movie to watch - but I think it's a MUST SEE movie.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 26 Oct 2008 01:26:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Discussion &amp;#8211; October 22, 2008</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/open_discussion_8211_october_22_2008/#comment-21637969</link><description>Ken, I have actually heard that BHC was not that bad (believe it or not). Could be one of the few instances where the trailer was far worse than the movie itself.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Go figure.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2008 00:11:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Discussion &amp;#8211; October 22, 2008</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/open_discussion_8211_october_22_2008/#comment-21637967</link><description>Just watched Smallville. Not Emmy-winning television, but they are definitely finally moving it towards the Superman mythos.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 23:39:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Discussion &amp;#8211; October 22, 2008</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/open_discussion_8211_october_22_2008/#comment-21637962</link><description>BTW guys, I'm looking for a little Digg help on a cool Star Trek post I did a while back that is one of my favorites:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://digg.com/movies/Star_Trek_How_Radical_Is_The_USS_Enterprise_Redesign" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://digg.com/movies/Star_Trek_How_Radical_Is...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If you can Digg it and spread the word it would be greatly appreciated! :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 19:30:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Discussion &amp;#8211; October 22, 2008</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/open_discussion_8211_october_22_2008/#comment-21637960</link><description>Thanks, Chuck. I noticed you on a couple of the same posts I was commenting on. Believe me, I feel like I'm sweeping back the ocean on topics like that, but I'm holding firm.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 19:29:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Discussion &amp;#8211; October 22, 2008</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/open_discussion_8211_october_22_2008/#comment-21637957</link><description>New extended Watchmen trailer is up... PLUS a new poster AND the MPAA rating for the film. :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 15:14:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Here It Is: The Official Full Star Trek Trailer</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/here_it_is_the_official_full_star_trek_trailer/#comment-21640097</link><description>@Daryl&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Yeah, they've changed the beaming effect for this movie, and I'm glad they're finally updating it from the TNG version.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 19:05:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Here It Is: The Official Full Star Trek Trailer</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/here_it_is_the_official_full_star_trek_trailer/#comment-21640086</link><description>@vitaboy&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It was established at some point during TOS that you can't activate a Warp Field within the gravity well of a planet (not that I think that would stop them from doing that here). 8-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 17:59:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Here It Is: The Official Full Star Trek Trailer</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/here_it_is_the_official_full_star_trek_trailer/#comment-21640076</link><description>@Ash Ali&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I stated in my "new Enterprise" post that although I didn't like the look of it in that picture, I was still willing to keep an open mind about seeing it in action on the big screen. :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 15:50:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twilight Sequels Have A Screenwriter</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/twilight_sequels_have_a_screenwriter/#comment-21640043</link><description>Thanks, ladies. No guarantees on if I'll like it though. :-P&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I'm invited to pre-screenings so that I can write up my reviews for publication on the day movies are released.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 10:20:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twilight Sequels Have A Screenwriter</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/twilight_sequels_have_a_screenwriter/#comment-21640039</link><description>I get to see the movie tomorrow (Tuesday) night. Can't put up my review until Friday, though.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 21:33:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Weekend Movie News Wrap Up: November 16, 2008</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/weekend_movie_news_wrap_up_november_16_2008/#comment-21640011</link><description>@Adrian&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I haven't heard anything about any trailers that might be attached to Twilight, sorry.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 16 Nov 2008 13:18:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Star Trek Trailer Mania!</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/star_trek_trailer_mania/#comment-21639999</link><description>Ya know folks... people are MUCH more likely to get through your comments of you use paragraphs. I know it makes it very hard for me to read if you have a huge block of text without paragraph breaks.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;You make me work to hard and I'll give up on reading what you have to say.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 27 Nov 2008 18:22:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Star Trek Trailer Mania!</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/star_trek_trailer_mania/#comment-21639990</link><description>New trailer is up:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://screenrant.com/official-hd-new-star-trek-trailer-vic-4243/" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://screenrant.com/official-hd-new-star-trek...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Plus I address the old vs. new Trek controversies.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 13:45:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Star Trek Trailer Mania!</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/star_trek_trailer_mania/#comment-21639981</link><description>@Ed&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The point of a trailer is to tease the movie, not give away the plot. On another post someone was complaining about the recent trailer for Will Smith's next movie "Seven Pounds" because it didn't tell you what the movie was about. I thought the opposite... that the trailer was perfect because it gave a sense of the emotion/angst of the character, something of a journey, but didn't spoil the plot at ALL.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I hate trailers that give away the story.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Then again in the end, who knows, you may turn out to be right and Star Trek won't be good. I've got my fingers crossed, though.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 16 Nov 2008 12:44:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Star Trek Trailer Mania!</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/star_trek_trailer_mania/#comment-21639974</link><description>LOL, Stella, you have a LONG memory. :-) Actually to be honest I don't know if that detail is even still in the film, so it may be moot at this point. 8-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 15 Nov 2008 23:21:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Star Trek Trailer Mania!</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/star_trek_trailer_mania/#comment-21639964</link><description>@tinfish&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Yeah, the "bra scene" in the trailer seemed out of place, but think back to the original series and how sexy those costumes must have been considered at the time - not to mention the dance scene of the green-skinned Orion slave girl. :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 15 Nov 2008 14:55:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Matt Reeves Discusses &amp;#8216;Cloverfield 2&amp;#8242;</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/matt_reeves_discusses_8216cloverfield_28242/#comment-21639956</link><description>The only way a second one might work is if they go in a completely different and unexpected direction. Think Ridley Scott's "Alien" vs. James Cameron's "Aliens."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I, for one really like "Cloverfield" a lot. So what if the storyline was thin - it was more about the experience - like being in the middle of a disaster as it happened in documentary mode.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 16 Nov 2008 12:40:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Another Unimpressive Trailer For &amp;#8216;The Spirit&amp;#8217;</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/another_unimpressive_trailer_for_8216the_spirit8217/#comment-21639921</link><description>@Ann&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I would love for you to be right. I don't WANT to see comic book-based movies fail. But I can tell you that the ENTIRE audience at Comic-Con was flabbergasted at how awful the footage we saw was.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 15 Nov 2008 23:22:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Marc Forster To Direct &amp;#8216;World War Z&amp;#8217;</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/marc_forster_to_direct_8216world_war_z8217/#comment-21639912</link><description>After seeing how Forster shot the action sequences in Quantum of Solace I think I may have to pass on this one.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 15 Nov 2008 12:29:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: My Own Worst Enemy, Was</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/my_own_worst_enemy_was/#comment-21639873</link><description>I saw the writing on the wall and stopped watching after about the third episode. Really it seemed this was meant to be more of limited mini-series than an ongoing TV show.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 11:25:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Latest Watchmen Trailer = All Kinds Of Awesome</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/latest_watchmen_trailer_all_kinds_of_awesome/#comment-21639849</link><description>My desire to see this is the same as it's been since this summer.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 01:18:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Latest Watchmen Trailer = All Kinds Of Awesome</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/latest_watchmen_trailer_all_kinds_of_awesome/#comment-21639845</link><description>That I do not know and honestly, don't want to. It will at least leave SOME surprise in the film for folks who've read the novel. :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 16 Nov 2008 18:55:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Latest Watchmen Trailer = All Kinds Of Awesome</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/latest_watchmen_trailer_all_kinds_of_awesome/#comment-21639840</link><description>@nowhereman&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Just to be clear - I don't take banning lightly. It wasn't based on this one comment - EVERY time he's commented it's been that sort of slam. Some guy with a grudge for who knows what reason.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 15 Nov 2008 12:28:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Latest Watchmen Trailer = All Kinds Of Awesome</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/latest_watchmen_trailer_all_kinds_of_awesome/#comment-21639837</link><description>@Draco&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I've had it with you. Pretty much every comment by you is insulting.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;You're banned.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Have a nice life.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 15 Nov 2008 01:13:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Latest Watchmen Trailer = All Kinds Of Awesome</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/latest_watchmen_trailer_all_kinds_of_awesome/#comment-21639826</link><description>@Andy&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Yeah, my wife said the same thing. But you know, if this existed in the real world, a person doing this WOULD change their voice.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2008 23:46:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Jigsaw Pics From Punisher: Warzone</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/jigsaw_pics_from_punisher_warzone/#comment-21639805</link><description>Personally I'm still hoping that despite the abysmal marketing of this film that the movie itself will turn out to be good. At least on a visceral "watch the bad guys get what they deserve" level.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 16 Nov 2008 12:41:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Download The Dark Knight Script &amp;#8211; Legally!</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/download_the_dark_knight_script_8211_legally/#comment-21639781</link><description>@Gary&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Because people like free stuff?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 11:23:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: First Teaser Trailer For &amp;#8216;2012&amp;#8242;</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/first_teaser_trailer_for_821620128242/#comment-21639760</link><description>@Canuck Lou&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Because his movies keep turning a profit.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2008 18:28:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: First Teaser Trailer For &amp;#8216;2012&amp;#8242;</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/first_teaser_trailer_for_821620128242/#comment-21639741</link><description>@Paula - well, that looked like the Himalayas to me... that's one HELL of a tsunami. 8-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;@joshi - Nah, he's just trying to pump up the movie and get people thinking about it to make 'em go see it.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2008 10:29:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Discussion &amp;#8211; November 12, 2008</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/open_discussion_8211_november_12_2008/#comment-21639705</link><description>@Rob Keyes&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Take out the preachiness (which I didn't like) and there are still the things you mentioned. It was like two movies smashed together into one. Another thing I've never heard explained to my satisfaction is why the "ancient" humans were portrayed by actual actors (the movie Wall-E watched, the president (Fred Willard) but the "present day" humans were CGI?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Why weren't ALL humans in the film portrayed as CGI?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2008 00:14:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Discussion &amp;#8211; November 12, 2008</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/open_discussion_8211_november_12_2008/#comment-21639697</link><description>Wish me luck guys, in an hour I'm off to a screening of "Twilight." 8-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 18:06:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Discussion &amp;#8211; November 12, 2008</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/open_discussion_8211_november_12_2008/#comment-21639685</link><description>@Ken&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Welcome to my world. Almost without exception other movie sites are bowing at the altar of Wall-E, and I for one don't get it.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 15 Nov 2008 23:23:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Discussion &amp;#8211; November 12, 2008</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/open_discussion_8211_november_12_2008/#comment-21639683</link><description>@Gary&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Yes, Kung Fu Panda was a Dreamworks film. I liked it better than Wall-E BTW. That's not to say it was the "better" film - just that I enjoyed it more.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 15 Nov 2008 12:31:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Discussion &amp;#8211; November 12, 2008</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/open_discussion_8211_november_12_2008/#comment-21639675</link><description>@Larry (and everyone else)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;You're in luck on the Watchmen trailer - it'll be online tonight at 5PM PST and I'll be posting it here as soon as I can.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2008 10:30:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Discussion &amp;#8211; November 12, 2008</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/open_discussion_8211_november_12_2008/#comment-21639662</link><description>LOL, you DID ask that before, didn't you... :-P&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I'll post up the Watchmen trailer as soon as it's available online.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 12:09:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Discussion &amp;#8211; November 12, 2008</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/open_discussion_8211_november_12_2008/#comment-21639659</link><description>@Will&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;As I've mentioned here previously, I'm not bashing this unless something comes up that I think is stupid. No, I don't like a couple of the Terminator concepts (snake-thing, motorcycle) but I think they have the right take on this based on what I've seen (at Comic-Con) and heard.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 10:53:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: First Look At J.J. Abrams&amp;#8217; New USS Enterprise</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/first_look_at_jj_abrams8217_new_uss_enterprise/#comment-21639646</link><description>I agree with your assessment of the 1701-E. I hate that thing with its dark panels and ginormous size. As if the 1701-D weren't huge enough they had to go and make the next one even bigger.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 31 Jan 2009 10:50:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: First Look At J.J. Abrams&amp;#8217; New USS Enterprise</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/first_look_at_jj_abrams8217_new_uss_enterprise/#comment-21639631</link><description>@Larry&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I echo your thoughts completely. As long as this version is done WELL, I will accept it as a "re-birth" of Trek.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 10:26:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: First Look At J.J. Abrams&amp;#8217; New USS Enterprise</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/first_look_at_jj_abrams8217_new_uss_enterprise/#comment-21639626</link><description>I think most fans are open to this and it's a small minority that is not.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;To me reboot and re-imagining are pretty much interchangeable terms.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 30 Nov 2008 23:40:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: First Look At J.J. Abrams&amp;#8217; New USS Enterprise</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/first_look_at_jj_abrams8217_new_uss_enterprise/#comment-21639622</link><description>@JimBob&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Ouch. 8-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Actually you're not far off on Roddenberry. Two stories come to mind: Adding lyrics to to the opening credit music because for some reason that made it qualify for residuals (or some such thing) and the design/creation of the IDIC medallion and inclusion in an episode so he could have knock-offs manufactured and sold as Star Trek jewelry.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 30 Nov 2008 13:26:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: First Look At J.J. Abrams&amp;#8217; New USS Enterprise</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/first_look_at_jj_abrams8217_new_uss_enterprise/#comment-21639602</link><description>@avoidz&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;That's a damn nice render of the original Enterprise.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 10:20:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: First Look At J.J. Abrams&amp;#8217; New USS Enterprise</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/first_look_at_jj_abrams8217_new_uss_enterprise/#comment-21639599</link><description>New trailer is up:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://screenrant.com/official-hd-new-star-trek-trailer-vic-4243/" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://screenrant.com/official-hd-new-star-trek...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Plus I address the old vs. new Trek controversies.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 13:45:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: First Look At J.J. Abrams&amp;#8217; New USS Enterprise</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/first_look_at_jj_abrams8217_new_uss_enterprise/#comment-21639595</link><description>@Joseph&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Bringing up the new James Bond in defense of your article = bad idea. Quantum of Solace made the most money of any Bond movie EVER on opening weekend, by far. :-P&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 12:02:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: First Look At J.J. Abrams&amp;#8217; New USS Enterprise</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/first_look_at_jj_abrams8217_new_uss_enterprise/#comment-21639590</link><description>@Joseph&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Well we'll have the trailer for you tomorrow, Monday morning. :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 16 Nov 2008 22:03:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: First Look At J.J. Abrams&amp;#8217; New USS Enterprise</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/first_look_at_jj_abrams8217_new_uss_enterprise/#comment-21639585</link><description>"Anti-Treks will never jump on board because they think it’s too nerdy, or dorky"&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I think you're way wrong on that point. There was nothing "nerdy or dorky" about that trailer and I think that's the whole reason Abrams was brought in - to get Star Trek away from that reputation.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 16 Nov 2008 20:31:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: First Look At J.J. Abrams&amp;#8217; New USS Enterprise</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/first_look_at_jj_abrams8217_new_uss_enterprise/#comment-21639582</link><description>@Joseph&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;"JJ Abrams, I hate to say this, but this design of yours seems to attract an audience that knows nothing about Trek."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;That IS the goal, bro. Because based on the last few movies and the last TV series the existing fanbase is obviously NOT enough to make Star Trek movies a very profitable venture.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Since you mention automobiles, you might be interested in this post I did a while back comparing the Enterprise redesign to the new trend of doing updated retro versions of classic cars:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://screenrant.com/classic-enterprise-update-vs-classic-cars-update-vic-1114/" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://screenrant.com/classic-enterprise-update...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic (another TOS fan)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 16 Nov 2008 12:54:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: First Look At J.J. Abrams&amp;#8217; New USS Enterprise</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/first_look_at_jj_abrams8217_new_uss_enterprise/#comment-21639574</link><description>Ok. The new Star Trek trailer was freaking AWESOME.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I don't like the white interior and I'm waiting to see how the ship looks in the movie (and whether it's the only version - I have a feeling there will be another), but the new trailer made it look like this movie is going WORK.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 16:54:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: First Look At J.J. Abrams&amp;#8217; New USS Enterprise</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/first_look_at_jj_abrams8217_new_uss_enterprise/#comment-21639566</link><description>@Jon&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;This is pure speculation but that is entirely possible. From the lips of Robert Orci in the comments over at TrekMovie.com:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;"If you see the movie, you will either agree with our final solution, or you won’t. But it’s too early to tell right."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Final solution... sure sounds like they have something interesting up their sleeves...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2008 23:48:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: First Look At J.J. Abrams&amp;#8217; New USS Enterprise</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/first_look_at_jj_abrams8217_new_uss_enterprise/#comment-21639563</link><description>@Spocks Brain&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Well I was FULLY prepared for an updated look. What bothers me is that it seems like for some design aspects, where they could have turned right to make it more similar to the original they turned left instead.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Like I've said about the bridge, fine, keep the new design - just make it in tans, reds and blacks. It would still look cool for new viewers but would have (probably) satisfied the fans. As far as the ship, as demonstrated by the fan-tweaked versions over at TrekMovie, there are subtle changes that could have been made that would have been less "offensive" to TOS fans and quite frankly just would have made the ship look better.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I'm still holding out hope for this.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2008 10:34:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: First Look At J.J. Abrams&amp;#8217; New USS Enterprise</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/first_look_at_jj_abrams8217_new_uss_enterprise/#comment-21639554</link><description>@David&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;No we haven't seen those things, but in Star Trek: Enterprise they made everything smaller than in the original show.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;@Mark&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I *still* don't like the Enterprise-E.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 12:59:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: First Look At J.J. Abrams&amp;#8217; New USS Enterprise</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/first_look_at_jj_abrams8217_new_uss_enterprise/#comment-21639547</link><description>@hicks&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Here's the deal (and my logic): They could have made the bridge look hyper-modern but have kept a color scheme with at least a passing resemblance to TOS and TNG. I mean when have we EVER seen a blazing white bridge on a Federation ship? Ever? Hell, take the same damn one they have, transparent panels and all but change the colors to the blacks/reds/tans of the original and I would have been as happy as a pig at the trough.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;As to the size of tricorders, communicators, etc. I believe that's a straw man argument. I would counter that the devices can do so MUCH that they by design have to be a bit larger.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Everyone says "blah blah cell phones tiny blah blah." Fine. Could your cell phone, WITHOUT cell towers, contact a ship in orbit? Do you think maybe we could excuse a Communicator not being the size of a pack of matches because it needs to be able to do what it does? Same goes for the Tricorder - it has such vast capabilities that to me it's silly if they make it too small.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 11:01:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: First Look At J.J. Abrams&amp;#8217; New USS Enterprise</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/first_look_at_jj_abrams8217_new_uss_enterprise/#comment-21639539</link><description>@joshi&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Well I *did* want non-fans' opinions so I appreciate your taking the time. :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Best,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 00:11:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: First Look At J.J. Abrams&amp;#8217; New USS Enterprise</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/first_look_at_jj_abrams8217_new_uss_enterprise/#comment-21639537</link><description>@joshi&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;No worries, bud. I made it quite clear in the opening paragraphs that my opinion on this was "As a long time Star Trek fan, whose favorite series is the original."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;:-P&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And as I also stated, this ship could very well look good on the big screen and as you pointed out, from different angles. I know that the Enterprise-D from "The Next Generation" looked pretty hideously fat from some angles.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It's just that this, combined with the Apple-store-looking bridge has me a bit leery as a fan.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2008 23:56:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: First Look At J.J. Abrams&amp;#8217; New USS Enterprise</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/first_look_at_jj_abrams8217_new_uss_enterprise/#comment-21639535</link><description>@joshi&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;You have your opinion, I have mine. Yes, there are things that are different, but some (for example the unbalanced proportions), taken as a whole make the ship look pretty ugly to me.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2008 23:37:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: First Look At J.J. Abrams&amp;#8217; New USS Enterprise</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/first_look_at_jj_abrams8217_new_uss_enterprise/#comment-21639532</link><description>Check out the photoshopped version of the new ship by "Spockboy" that I've added to the end of the post. That minor change actually makes the ship look 10X better.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The more I look at that skinny "tail" the worse it looks.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2008 22:51:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: First Look At J.J. Abrams&amp;#8217; New USS Enterprise</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/first_look_at_jj_abrams8217_new_uss_enterprise/#comment-21639530</link><description>I think my main beef with the design is the teeny-tiny "butt" on this thing. The back part of the secondary hull is so thin it almost looks like a caricature.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Check out what this guy did and see how much better it looks:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v617/spockboy/ENTERPRISE-new.jpg" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v617/spockboy...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2008 22:40:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: First Look At J.J. Abrams&amp;#8217; New USS Enterprise</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/first_look_at_jj_abrams8217_new_uss_enterprise/#comment-21639527</link><description>@Bvance&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I can understand updating a design. I mean the original was ahead of its time when it aired, but it's too plain for a film. I thought the Trek movie ships were beautiful.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But as a couple of folks stated above, this looks both too much like Galaxy Quest and too "organic" a la Star Wars Episodes I-III.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2008 22:32:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Discussion &amp;#8211; October 22, 2008</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/open_discussion_8211_october_22_2008/#comment-21637955</link><description>@Deadpool&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;We'll be posting up that footage later today.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 14:41:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Discussion &amp;#8211; October 22, 2008</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/open_discussion_8211_october_22_2008/#comment-21637954</link><description>@Dan&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Just posted up an article about the far away Hulk sequel.&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 14:41:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Discussion &amp;#8211; October 22, 2008</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/open_discussion_8211_october_22_2008/#comment-21637947</link><description>@Clean Talking Chimp&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Doh!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thanks for pointing that out! :-P&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 11:29:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Daniel Craig Turns Down Thor</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/daniel_craig_turns_down_thor/#comment-21637922</link><description>Hey gang, have another look at the post. "the old man" gave us a beefier photoshop of Daniel Craig. :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 23:22:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Nick Fury To Play Bigger Role In Iron Man 2</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/nick_fury_to_play_bigger_role_in_iron_man_2/#comment-21637846</link><description>@Rob&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It'll never happen - different studios own the rights to different characters.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2008 18:25:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A Brief Report On The 2008 Spike TV Scream Awards</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/a_brief_report_on_the_2008_spike_tv_scream_awards/#comment-21637819</link><description>Neither. And thanks, I just realized I forgot to put in Brian Kettler's name!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 20 Oct 2008 12:59:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Iron Man 2: Marvel Blindsides Terrence Howard</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/iron_man_2_marvel_blindsides_terrence_howard/#comment-21637752</link><description>@Jody&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I know what you mean. It sounds completely bizarre. Only time will tell what the real story is here.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 18 Oct 2008 19:52:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: New Push Trailer = Heroes: The Movie</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/new_push_trailer_heroes_the_movie/#comment-21637746</link><description>@Steph&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Well I'm glad you're not hiding behind a keyboard and getting out once in a while. :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2009 11:01:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: New Push Trailer = Heroes: The Movie</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/new_push_trailer_heroes_the_movie/#comment-21637740</link><description>@KG&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;No worries and it's good to have you here.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Sorry if I was a little rough, but sometimes we get commenters here who start with a post like that and it's just the tip of the iceberg. I'm very strict about maintaining civility here on the site.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Best regards,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 19 Oct 2008 21:00:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: New Push Trailer = Heroes: The Movie</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/new_push_trailer_heroes_the_movie/#comment-21637737</link><description>@KG&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If you are referring to me, the author of this post, pardon me for not being familiar with every single piece of literature, TV show and movie EVER created.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;No need to come on here and be rude. Kick it up a notch and you'll find your comments deleted before they see the light of day.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 19 Oct 2008 12:42:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: New Push Trailer = Heroes: The Movie</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/new_push_trailer_heroes_the_movie/#comment-21637729</link><description>It was written by David Bourla who has not written much worth noting.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 18 Oct 2008 17:30:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Indiana Jones 4 Special Edition DVD Giveaway [WINNERS!]</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/indiana_jones_4_special_edition_dvd_giveaway_winners/#comment-21637724</link><description>This is the first contest I've run where I haven't received not only a single thank you, but not even an acknowledgment from the winners.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Doesn't exactly fire me up for my next contest.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 11:01:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Indiana Jones 4 Special Edition DVD Giveaway [WINNERS!]</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/indiana_jones_4_special_edition_dvd_giveaway_winners/#comment-21637711</link><description>I know a lot of regular Screen Rant readers aren't fans, but I thought others would be interested in this. :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 13:30:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: J.J. Abrams&amp;#8217; Star Trek: A New Frontier</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/jj_abrams8217_star_trek_a_new_frontier/#comment-21637693</link><description>Damn... I caught one of the doctor references when I edited the post, didn't think there would be more than one.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 18 Oct 2008 14:02:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: J.J. Abrams&amp;#8217; Star Trek: A New Frontier</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/jj_abrams8217_star_trek_a_new_frontier/#comment-21637679</link><description>@Deadpool&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I'm with "Battle." I'm a lifelong Trekkie (no, you don't have to call me a "Trekker") and I believe that over the decades the franchise has become a shadow of what it could be. That is of course due mainly to two people Rick Berman and Brannon Braga (mainly Berman) who drove nail after nail into the coffin with their decisions on where to take the franchise.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I believe that continuing to move forward in the "Next Generation" universe would simply continue the trend of diminishing box office for any future films and that this is actually a brilliant idea.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;God knows, I'm stunned hearing myself say that I actually think the terms "reboot" and my beloved "Star Trek" belong together, but I think this is probably a brilliant idea for reinvigorating the Star Trek brand.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Sure, there are things I'm not overly happy with, like the white, bright Enterprise bridge, the fact they didn't go with Paul McGillion from Stargate: Atlantis for Scotty, and some of the comments made in the EW article mentioned above about the opening of the movie shaking up long-time fans' perceptions.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I've been cautiously optimistic about this since I first heard about it and I remain so.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;JJ &amp;amp; Co. PLEASE don't let me down!!!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 18 Oct 2008 00:04:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Another Batch Of Star Trek Images!</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/another_batch_of_star_trek_images/#comment-21637663</link><description>@Mark&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thanks for that link! IMHO it was a very bad decision to go with that particular photographer for that shot. I don't know what they were thinking.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 18 Oct 2008 13:59:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Another Batch Of Star Trek Images!</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/another_batch_of_star_trek_images/#comment-21637658</link><description>Honestly out of the entire cast the only "featureless" faces are Quinto and Pine, and I think that's just because the photos are from a magazine shoot. If you look at the scenes from the film, they don't look that way.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;"Twinks," damn... haven't heard THAT term in a LONG time. :-P&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 18 Oct 2008 00:31:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Max Payne Review</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/max_payne_review/#comment-21637619</link><description>@JonIntulsa&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Excellent point and it just speaks to how poorly this movie was written.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 20 Oct 2008 17:57:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Max Payne Review</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/max_payne_review/#comment-21637617</link><description>@JonInTulsa&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Regarding your closing comment. You are obviously NOT married nor ever have been. If his wife died and he was so affected by it that he's been obsessively following every single lead for three years straight, and then a woman lays in bed and starts pretending she's his wife, I would have kicked her the hell out as well. Regardless of how "hot" she was.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 20 Oct 2008 10:07:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Max Payne Review</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/max_payne_review/#comment-21637613</link><description>BTW, I didn't stay through the credits because by the end it was so awful I just wanted to get the heck out of the theater.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 19 Oct 2008 01:29:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Max Payne Review</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/max_payne_review/#comment-21637612</link><description>@David90&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Really? The movie was made for fans of the video game and NO ONE ElSE?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Right. Brilliant. Really.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Oh, and go see what everyone else is saying about the movie. I was kind. Trust me.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Have a nice day.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 19 Oct 2008 01:27:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Max Payne Review</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/max_payne_review/#comment-21637599</link><description>@Deadpool&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thanks for sharing your thoughts on the film!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 18 Oct 2008 00:08:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Max Payne Review</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/max_payne_review/#comment-21637591</link><description>@Deadpool&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Since you're very familiar with the game I'd love to hear your opinion on the movie.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2008 10:12:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: New Poster For The Spirit Looks Better Than The Movie</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/new_poster_for_the_spirit_looks_better_than_the_movie/#comment-21637576</link><description>I disagree. I'm not comparing his directing to his writing. From what I've seen so far it just looks like a bad movie. And as to "giving him a break," this isn't a personal pet project, this is a major motion picture that cost tens of millions of dollars to produce.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 19 Oct 2008 12:45:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Pirates Of The Caribbean 4 Rumors Shot Down</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/pirates_of_the_caribbean_4_rumors_shot_down/#comment-21637440</link><description>Yup, two movies. Still, that's a huge sum to be put out there.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2008 00:13:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Pirates Of The Caribbean 4 Rumors Shot Down</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/pirates_of_the_caribbean_4_rumors_shot_down/#comment-21637438</link><description>@the old man&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Well... Keep in mind no one has debunked Tobey Macguire getting $50MM for Spider-Man 4 &amp;amp; 5, so it's not THAT whacked to think Depp could have been offered that much.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2008 23:17:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 7 Brand New Star Trek Images: Crew, New Bridge And More! [UPDATED]</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/7_brand_new_star_trek_images_crew_new_bridge_and_more_updated/#comment-21637424</link><description>What spelling are you guys referring to? I edit every post, but I am after all, human. :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 26 Oct 2008 01:22:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 7 Brand New Star Trek Images: Crew, New Bridge And More! [UPDATED]</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/7_brand_new_star_trek_images_crew_new_bridge_and_more_updated/#comment-21637423</link><description>Guys, this is obviously a "reboot." I don't know WHY the hell they didn't at least keep the color scheme from the old bridge intact. I can see updating it, but this is going to piss off longtime fans.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Of course, as Abrams has said, this isn't for Star Trek fans, it's for movie fans.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I am actually open to this if it will keep Star Trek alive. And that's coming from a guy whose favorite series is TOS.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 26 Oct 2008 01:21:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 7 Brand New Star Trek Images: Crew, New Bridge And More! [UPDATED]</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/7_brand_new_star_trek_images_crew_new_bridge_and_more_updated/#comment-21637401</link><description>Um, can we get off the bathroom humor thing? I mean, seriously...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2008 13:21:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 7 Brand New Star Trek Images: Crew, New Bridge And More! [UPDATED]</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/7_brand_new_star_trek_images_crew_new_bridge_and_more_updated/#comment-21637394</link><description>Hi David,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Welcome to the site. I'm a huge Star Trek fan going WAY back.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2008 17:19:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 7 Brand New Star Trek Images: Crew, New Bridge And More! [UPDATED]</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/7_brand_new_star_trek_images_crew_new_bridge_and_more_updated/#comment-21637391</link><description>@Deadpool&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Don't recall if they're signed on but the plan IS to make this a "new" franchise if the first film does well.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2008 13:23:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 7 Brand New Star Trek Images: Crew, New Bridge And More! [UPDATED]</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/7_brand_new_star_trek_images_crew_new_bridge_and_more_updated/#comment-21637384</link><description>@Mark&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;That looks like an homage to the development of the original Enterprise. The next to final design idea for the NCC-1701 was essentially what we saw on the show, but flipped upside down.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;That's what that image appears to convey.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2008 10:56:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 7 Brand New Star Trek Images: Crew, New Bridge And More! [UPDATED]</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/7_brand_new_star_trek_images_crew_new_bridge_and_more_updated/#comment-21637365</link><description>Well, this IS supposed to be the crew not long after leaving Starfleet Academy.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;After digesting the images above, I'm thinking my cautious optimism on this film may have been justified.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;My two favorite images are Quinto as Spock choking that guy and the combined cast shot. Karl Urban looks like he's channeling DeForest Kelly so well it's eerie.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;What I'm not too jazzed about is the look of the bridge. It's too bright. From everything I'd heard about an updated, yet faithful reproduction, I was truly expecting that the color scheme of the new bridge would match that of the old.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It looks too "Star Wars"-ish to me. Take that set and put it in the reds, tans and blacks of the original and it would look a lot more like TOS.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2008 23:06:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Discussion &amp;#8211; October 15, 2008</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/open_discussion_8211_october_15_2008/#comment-21637352</link><description>Max Payne review will be online in 40 minutes. :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2008 23:18:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Discussion &amp;#8211; October 15, 2008</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/open_discussion_8211_october_15_2008/#comment-21637344</link><description>@michael&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Dude, you REALLY need to remove George Lucas from that list IMHO.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2008 17:39:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Discussion &amp;#8211; October 15, 2008</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/open_discussion_8211_october_15_2008/#comment-21637334</link><description>Studios HAVE to reach out to "the mainstream audience" because that's where the money is. Look at what happened to Star Trek... the fanbase alone can't support a movie financially (and in Trek's case even the fans bailed as the movies got worse and worse).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The thing is, if you make a GREAT movie you'll satisfy the fans AND the mainstream audience AND make a ton of money.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Win-win.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2008 10:57:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Time For Another Catwoman/Batman 3 Rumor</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/time_for_another_catwomanbatman_3_rumor/#comment-21637281</link><description>Hey gang, just for fun PhotoShopLifter Dan did a little manip and sent in an image of Rhona Mitra as Catwoman. Check out the update post above. :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2008 23:01:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Time For Another Catwoman/Batman 3 Rumor</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/time_for_another_catwomanbatman_3_rumor/#comment-21637273</link><description>@FRED&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Knowing Nolan's approach, IF Catwoman is in the next film I'm sure she'd be completely "human."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2008 10:55:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twilight Sequel Already In The Works?</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/twilight_sequel_already_in_the_works/#comment-21637241</link><description>@Gary&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Eragon opened to a $23.2MM weekend - not terrible, and went on to earn $75MM US and almost $250MM worldwide (if you can believe it!).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Currently, guess where the book "Twilight" is ranked at Amazon in sales?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;#2&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 17:42:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Terrence Howard Out Of Iron Man 2!</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/terrence_howard_out_of_iron_man_2/#comment-21637203</link><description>@Ken J&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;What's really interesting is that Judge is a total goofball off camera - always has the most gigantic smile on his face. :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2008 10:13:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Review: My Own Worst Enemy</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/review_my_own_worst_enemy/#comment-21637169</link><description>You'll get my DVR when you pry it from my cold, dead fingers.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;:-P&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2008 10:54:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Heroes&amp;#8217; Ratings In Sharp Decline</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/heroes8217_ratings_in_sharp_decline/#comment-21637141</link><description>I would have gotten to this sooner but I've been away from a computer all morning.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;All of "movement's" comments have been deleted and further comments from him will go into moderation and I will determine whether to post them or not.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Sorry you had to put up with that, folks.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2008 14:40:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Heroes&amp;#8217; Ratings In Sharp Decline</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/heroes8217_ratings_in_sharp_decline/#comment-21637138</link><description>I'm going to nip any more lawsuit talk in the bud. I won't have this thread hijacked like the last one was.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2008 10:59:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Heroes&amp;#8217; Ratings In Sharp Decline</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/heroes8217_ratings_in_sharp_decline/#comment-21637128</link><description>Hey, if I can hang in there with Smallville for 7 seasons, you can be sure I'll be sticking with Heroes in the hope it'll start to gel. :-P&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 23:58:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Heroes&amp;#8217; Ratings In Sharp Decline</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/heroes8217_ratings_in_sharp_decline/#comment-21637126</link><description>I'm not "gleeful." I've been a huge supporter of Heroes in the past.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 23:17:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Heroes&amp;#8217; Ratings In Sharp Decline</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/heroes8217_ratings_in_sharp_decline/#comment-21637120</link><description>I'll tell you what I'm waiting for:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Dressed in black, bad-ass Hiro.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I'm tired of him being a dork.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 15:32:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Heroes&amp;#8217; Ratings In Sharp Decline</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/heroes8217_ratings_in_sharp_decline/#comment-21637118</link><description>Um, Hiro had no problem doing a "micro" timeshift about 4 times in a row in the scene where he unearthed what's his face at the cemetery. He is obviously also going to go back and undo Ando's death.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;As to Sylar and overhearing the conversation, he was obviously interested in knowing what they were talking about. I would think that he wouldn't even have to actively "call up" that power - just wanting to know what they were discussing and straining slightly to hear it would have allowed him to.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;This is fun. :-P&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 14:53:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Heroes&amp;#8217; Ratings In Sharp Decline</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/heroes8217_ratings_in_sharp_decline/#comment-21637116</link><description>LOL, Kofi the complaints address specific points. I want them to have powers, I just want them to use them logically. I think the writers shot themselves in the foot by making some of the characters TOO powerful in seasons 1 &amp;amp; 2 and are now dialing them back. Same thing with the time travel issue that is now a monkey on their back because it's so dumb when bad events aren't erased by a 30 second "reboot."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Unfortunately the Pandora's box is now open.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Another "for instance" is why couldn't Sylar hear what HRG was saying to vortex guys? One of the first powers he picked up in season 1 was super-hearing.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;You're doing the same thing we are, but in the opposite direction. You're not addressing the specific points that we bring up, instead you're just complaining that we're complaining.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;:-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 11:37:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Harrison Ford Talks Indiana Jones 5</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/harrison_ford_talks_indiana_jones_5/#comment-21636204</link><description>Regarding Indy 2: After the amazing character that was Marion played with such spunk as Karen Allen, to introduce a blonde ditz of a woman played annoyingly by Kate Kapshaw was a HUUUUUUUGGGGEEEE disappointment to me.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Oh and the introduction of the annoying "Half-round" just compounded that.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Sorry, but that's my opinion.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thanks goodness for Indy 3 as a follow-up.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 05 Oct 2008 13:43:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Harrison Ford Talks Indiana Jones 5</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/harrison_ford_talks_indiana_jones_5/#comment-21636200</link><description>There's no word that Spielberg will be involved with this at this point in time.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 05 Oct 2008 00:53:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Harrison Ford Talks Indiana Jones 5</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/harrison_ford_talks_indiana_jones_5/#comment-21636190</link><description>@Joseph&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Yeah, I've tried to sit through Indy 2 recently (I have the set on DVD) and just couldn't do it. It's pretty much unwatchable to me now.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But damn... Indy 4 did bring us "Nuke the fridge."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 04 Oct 2008 13:32:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: First Dragonball Trailer = Fail</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/first_dragonball_trailer_fail/#comment-21636159</link><description>I'm closing comments on this thread since people can't seem to discuss this without getting personal.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 22:19:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: First Dragonball Trailer = Fail</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/first_dragonball_trailer_fail/#comment-21636146</link><description>@SIN187UM&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I don't know what kind of forum you're used to but here at Screen Rant we are civil and polite to one another even when we disagree.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Dial it down or you're going to start finding your comments deleted.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 20:59:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: First Dragonball Trailer = Fail</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/first_dragonball_trailer_fail/#comment-21636122</link><description>@Carrie&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I'll see about getting another post up on this reflecting the latest info regarding the footage.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 10:35:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A Prequel/Sequel To 300!</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/a_prequelsequel_to_300/#comment-21636059</link><description>Thanks, Wes. It's greatly appreciated.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 23:49:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A Prequel/Sequel To 300!</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/a_prequelsequel_to_300/#comment-21636050</link><description>Appreciate it Oscar but I will admit we let stuff slip through the cracks. We just don't have the manpower to cover everything I'd like to.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;We try to make up for it with our Round-Up posts, but that's not ideal I know.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 13:50:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A Prequel/Sequel To 300!</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/a_prequelsequel_to_300/#comment-21636048</link><description>@Your Face&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Hey, maybe you could provide us with a link to your movie website? Oh wait, you don't HAVE one? I see.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If you want straight up news without opinion, feel free to visit any of the dozens of other movie news sites out there. We run a small operation over here with a handful of guys who all have day jobs.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The point of Screen Rant is to editorialize the news - and yeah, sometimes we wait a day or two because as Oscar said, a lot of the time they turn out to be bogus.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Believe me I'd love to have more writers so we could cover more news, but it's hard to find people out there who can write this sort of thing at higher than a 5th grade level. I strive for quality in writing and coverage here and I think we provide that.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Have a nice day.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 13:37:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Is SAG Still Planning A Strike?</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/is_sag_still_planning_a_strike/#comment-21636022</link><description>Ya know, I really LOVE movies and TV, but I have a hard time drumming up sympathy for people who's goal in life is to "play pretend" for a living and get paid insane amounts of money.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I DON'T think that about the people behind the camera, however, who earn far less yet work far harder.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 10:15:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Is SAG Still Planning A Strike?</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/is_sag_still_planning_a_strike/#comment-21636015</link><description>@fifty8th&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I'm with ya. When I read this I thought "you're kidding, is this STILL not settled?"&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;There would be ZERO sympathy from the public.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 23:40:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: So Far, So Amazing For Watchmen</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/so_far_so_amazing_for_watchmen/#comment-21635980</link><description>For another really well written overview check out Mr Beaks' writeup at AICN:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.aintitcool.com/node/38593" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.aintitcool.com/node/38593&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 18:14:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Gort Is Angry In New 5-Minute Trailer</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/gort_is_angry_in_new_5_minute_trailer/#comment-21638702</link><description>@Thiz&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;(slaps forehead) Holy cow! I never thought of that!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I can voice my opinion on what I think of the concept of a movie before it airs. If I turn out to be wrong I'll happily eat my words.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But if someone came up with an idea to remake "Casablanca" and have it take place in East LA with gang-bangers I'm pretty sure that would be a POS without even having laid eyes on a trailer.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 22:39:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Gort Is Angry In New 5-Minute Trailer</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/gort_is_angry_in_new_5_minute_trailer/#comment-21638700</link><description>Sure, it &lt;strong&gt;looks&lt;/strong&gt; cool and dramatic, but &lt;strong&gt;every&lt;/strong&gt; time I watch footage from this and hear the line:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;em&gt;"If the human race dies, the Earth survives."&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I just shake my head in disbelief at the core concept of this movie.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 21:52:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Gort Is Angry In New 5-Minute Trailer</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/gort_is_angry_in_new_5_minute_trailer/#comment-21638692</link><description>@zeus&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Well your HSM3 comments notwithstanding, if you hated Transformers you'll fit in just fine here at Screen Rant. :-P&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 16:00:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Gort Is Angry In New 5-Minute Trailer</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/gort_is_angry_in_new_5_minute_trailer/#comment-21638686</link><description>@David&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;LOL, yes, because the trees and flowers and insects are much more important than the human beings who inhabit the Earth.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Let's see... save my daughter from certain death or a species from going extinct. Buh bye Mr Animal.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 11:17:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Discussion &amp;#8211; October 29, 2008</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/open_discussion_8211_october_29_2008/#comment-21638663</link><description>@Deadpool&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Yeah, I'm sure people said the same thing about "The Day the Earth Stood Still."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 02 Nov 2008 01:00:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Discussion &amp;#8211; October 29, 2008</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/open_discussion_8211_october_29_2008/#comment-21638660</link><description>@Deadpool&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Yeah, heard about that late last night. I just wrote something up about it.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 01 Nov 2008 14:41:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Discussion &amp;#8211; October 29, 2008</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/open_discussion_8211_october_29_2008/#comment-21638650</link><description>@Deadpool&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If the discussion had been limited to those who usually visit the site it would have been more civil, but unexpectedly the post made it to the front page of Digg, which brought in the masses of hateful Diggers.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Kind of similar to &lt;a href="http://AintItCool.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;AintItCool.com&lt;/a&gt; talkbackers. :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 17:54:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Discussion &amp;#8211; October 29, 2008</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/open_discussion_8211_october_29_2008/#comment-21638645</link><description>I saw that Dr Strange news yesterday but it is insanely speculative about a movie that is years away.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 11:36:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Official Avengers And Iron Man Sequel Details</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/official_avengers_and_iron_man_sequel_details/#comment-21638605</link><description>Sure, I hear ya - I just don't want to start a rumor that Cheadle is getting $30MM for Iron Man 2. :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 23:29:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Official Avengers And Iron Man Sequel Details</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/official_avengers_and_iron_man_sequel_details/#comment-21638603</link><description>I don't know where 790 pulled that $30MM number from but there is NO way that's accurate.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 23:12:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Official Avengers And Iron Man Sequel Details</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/official_avengers_and_iron_man_sequel_details/#comment-21638583</link><description>@Gary&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Please email me via the "drop us a note" link below so we can get this figured out. I haven't emailed you because I just figured it would bounce along with all the other emails.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Sorry about the 'tude, bud.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 16:34:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Official Avengers And Iron Man Sequel Details</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/official_avengers_and_iron_man_sequel_details/#comment-21638570</link><description>I doubt very seriously that cameos count as an appearance in a multi-movie deal.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And Gary what is it going to take to get you to stop using that email address when commenting?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 11:07:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Official Avengers And Iron Man Sequel Details</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/official_avengers_and_iron_man_sequel_details/#comment-21638568</link><description>@The Glove&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If you think about it, the only time Hulk hasn't been heroic in both films is when he's being chased/attacked.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 10:17:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: More New Star Trek Images!</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/more_new_star_trek_images/#comment-21638551</link><description>@Draco&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Is that sarcasm I detect or are you being genuine?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 20:51:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: More New Star Trek Images!</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/more_new_star_trek_images/#comment-21638535</link><description>Have I mentioned how much I hate the magazine cover pics for this movie? In both the EW cover and now this one (shown on the right side of the very top image) Kirk and Spock look... well... gay.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And before you jump all over me, I'm not the only one who's had that thought - Over at Gizmodo they mention it in the post and I've seen it mentioned in comments on other sites as well.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 22:10:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Neil Gaiman Is Out Of Black Hole</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/neil_gaiman_is_out_of_black_hole/#comment-21638525</link><description>Neil,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I've corrected my writer's post to accurately convey your quote.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thanks for stopping by, I just regret that it had to be to correct an erroneous quote by you.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Best regards,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic Holtreman, owner of Screen Rant</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 14:51:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: &amp;#8216;Fireproof&amp;#8217; Earns Twice As Much As &amp;#8216;Religulous&amp;#8217;</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/8216fireproof8217_earns_twice_as_much_as_8216religulous8217/#comment-21638523</link><description>And on that high note, I'll be closing comments on this post. :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 20:11:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: &amp;#8216;Fireproof&amp;#8217; Earns Twice As Much As &amp;#8216;Religulous&amp;#8217;</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/8216fireproof8217_earns_twice_as_much_as_8216religulous8217/#comment-21638520</link><description>@Caleb (interesting choice for a screen name considering the movies we're discussing)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Great comment and I understand what you're saying. Fireproof was certainly no cinematic tour de force, but I enjoyed it for its message. This was an unusual post for this site so I hope you stick around.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;@stygyan said,&lt;br&gt;&lt;em&gt;"I could say maybe it is because we atheists can be atheists without movies to reassure us in our particular view of the world."&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Um, no one I know that saw this movie needed it to "reassure" them, no more than a fan of the "Saw" movies watches those to reassure them that there is cruelty in the world.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 19:52:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: &amp;#8216;Fireproof&amp;#8217; Earns Twice As Much As &amp;#8216;Religulous&amp;#8217;</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/8216fireproof8217_earns_twice_as_much_as_8216religulous8217/#comment-21638502</link><description>@SomeAudioGuy&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Welcome to the site. :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If people are under the impression that I didn't think this would generate a heated discussion, they are very mistaken. I just think that these things can be debated in a civil manner.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 17:03:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: &amp;#8216;Fireproof&amp;#8217; Earns Twice As Much As &amp;#8216;Religulous&amp;#8217;</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/8216fireproof8217_earns_twice_as_much_as_8216religulous8217/#comment-21638493</link><description>Um, most of the Bible was written thousands of years before Christ was born. It's in the Old Testament that lawmaking and even government was established. You are taking things out of context and twisting their original meaning.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Feel free to have the last word, because this is mine.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Best regards,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 16:31:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: &amp;#8216;Fireproof&amp;#8217; Earns Twice As Much As &amp;#8216;Religulous&amp;#8217;</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/8216fireproof8217_earns_twice_as_much_as_8216religulous8217/#comment-21638491</link><description>@JustMe&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;60% more theaters - double the box office. Again, the POINT of this was that I was surprised that on a per theater and longevity/word of mouth basis that Maher's film didn't do better based on frankly, folks like you.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 16:25:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: &amp;#8216;Fireproof&amp;#8217; Earns Twice As Much As &amp;#8216;Religulous&amp;#8217;</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/8216fireproof8217_earns_twice_as_much_as_8216religulous8217/#comment-21638490</link><description>@JustMe&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Yeah, I've got time to wade through 16 reference articles. I looked through a couple and nowhere did I see anything about incorporating non-married, living together couples in to the stats.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I reply politely and you come back with your "spoon feed" comment. Thanks for reinforcing my point of view.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 16:24:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: &amp;#8216;Fireproof&amp;#8217; Earns Twice As Much As &amp;#8216;Religulous&amp;#8217;</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/8216fireproof8217_earns_twice_as_much_as_8216religulous8217/#comment-21638486</link><description>@Chris&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Where do you think the entire basis for law originates? How about the concept of right and wrong? The Bible, bro.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And on the other side we are just as offended by having things that we find offensive crammed down OUR throats.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 16:18:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: &amp;#8216;Fireproof&amp;#8217; Earns Twice As Much As &amp;#8216;Religulous&amp;#8217;</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/8216fireproof8217_earns_twice_as_much_as_8216religulous8217/#comment-21638482</link><description>@David&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Interesting stats - I'd be curious to see more extensive detail... like the number and percentage of non-Christians who live together and aren't married, and then split up. You can't divorce if you were never married.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 16:07:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: &amp;#8216;Fireproof&amp;#8217; Earns Twice As Much As &amp;#8216;Religulous&amp;#8217;</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/8216fireproof8217_earns_twice_as_much_as_8216religulous8217/#comment-21638481</link><description>@Vince&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;This was not a review. The point of my post was that I was honestly amazed that Religulous didn't do better at the box office considering everything I read online and everything I hear in the media.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Of course I'm biased - this is a blog and I make it very clear that I (nor any of my writers) make any attempt at objectivity. The whole point of this site (and most blogs) is to be subjective.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I personally know many people who don't believe in God and I can tell you that as a group they are neither nasty nor condescending - two qualities I find in VAST abundance in the online community whenever religion (or politics, for that matter) comes up as a topic.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Best regards,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 16:03:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: &amp;#8216;Fireproof&amp;#8217; Earns Twice As Much As &amp;#8216;Religulous&amp;#8217;</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/8216fireproof8217_earns_twice_as_much_as_8216religulous8217/#comment-21638480</link><description>@John&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The anonymity of the internet is the worst thing about it - there is no consequence for anything you say to anyone, no matter how vile. That's why I've made it a point to use my real name on this site. I won't hide behind the curtain of anonymity.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And if you believe the "skew" is backwards, you've been spending too much time online. Go out and get some fresh air.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 15:59:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: &amp;#8216;Fireproof&amp;#8217; Earns Twice As Much As &amp;#8216;Religulous&amp;#8217;</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/8216fireproof8217_earns_twice_as_much_as_8216religulous8217/#comment-21638470</link><description>FYI, I'm staggering the comments in order to not crash my server. As long as they are not offensive they WILL be posted.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 15:13:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: &amp;#8216;Fireproof&amp;#8217; Earns Twice As Much As &amp;#8216;Religulous&amp;#8217;</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/8216fireproof8217_earns_twice_as_much_as_8216religulous8217/#comment-21638461</link><description>@jason&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Sigh. My point is that I thought it might have done much better considering the current (apparent) social climate in the US.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 14:51:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: &amp;#8216;Fireproof&amp;#8217; Earns Twice As Much As &amp;#8216;Religulous&amp;#8217;</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/8216fireproof8217_earns_twice_as_much_as_8216religulous8217/#comment-21638448</link><description>@Bill&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I'm not upset about anything - in fact I'm pleased. I was just surprised is all. When you spend a lot of time online you start think that that folks with your point of view vastly outnumber people with mine.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Until you step outside your front door and actually go interact with people.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Have a nice day.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 13:36:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: &amp;#8216;Fireproof&amp;#8217; Earns Twice As Much As &amp;#8216;Religulous&amp;#8217;</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/8216fireproof8217_earns_twice_as_much_as_8216religulous8217/#comment-21638434</link><description>Oh, it just occurred to me... all this talk of "you can't compare these two movies?" Over the last few weeks no one had an issue comparing the box office of "Beverly Hills Chihuahua" to "Body of Lies" or any other film it was up against, lol.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 12:55:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: &amp;#8216;Fireproof&amp;#8217; Earns Twice As Much As &amp;#8216;Religulous&amp;#8217;</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/8216fireproof8217_earns_twice_as_much_as_8216religulous8217/#comment-21638433</link><description>@jc&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The only thing I've seen from Facing the Giants is that football crawl scene on youtube. I didn't know what it was from at the time but it blew me away as inspirational for ANYONE (it had nothing to do with religion).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 10:18:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: &amp;#8216;Fireproof&amp;#8217; Earns Twice As Much As &amp;#8216;Religulous&amp;#8217;</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/8216fireproof8217_earns_twice_as_much_as_8216religulous8217/#comment-21638428</link><description>@Sabin&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I thought you wrote a fair comment until you added a "lol" to using faith to save a marriage.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I'd love to see some stats on divorce stats between committed Christians and those with less faith.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I haven't seen Religulous yet, but I guess I will now once it's out on DVD. I did hear that Maher's closing statement in the film is about as anti-religious as you can get, even from atheist websites, so methinks you're not exactly being objective.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 23:43:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: &amp;#8216;Fireproof&amp;#8217; Earns Twice As Much As &amp;#8216;Religulous&amp;#8217;</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/8216fireproof8217_earns_twice_as_much_as_8216religulous8217/#comment-21638423</link><description>@JM&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I haven't seen "Facing the Giants" but I certainly can't understand your comment about "Fireproof."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Being married and having my own tendency towards anger I thought the movie was very meaningful in showing that he couldn't turn himself around on his own and had to reach out to God for help.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 10:18:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: &amp;#8216;Fireproof&amp;#8217; Earns Twice As Much As &amp;#8216;Religulous&amp;#8217;</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/8216fireproof8217_earns_twice_as_much_as_8216religulous8217/#comment-21638412</link><description>I still don't understand the evolutionary need to appreciate art and beauty, how reason "evolved" and why (apparently) no other species wastes its time pondering its own existence or wondering where it came from.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Of course neither side is going to convince the other here, so any attempt to do so is really pointless.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 00:17:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: &amp;#8216;Fireproof&amp;#8217; Earns Twice As Much As &amp;#8216;Religulous&amp;#8217;</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/8216fireproof8217_earns_twice_as_much_as_8216religulous8217/#comment-21638396</link><description>@Matt&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;That's a straw man argument if I ever heard one. So only ATHIESTS were going to turn out to see Maher's movie? Not agnostics, Christians-in-name-only, etc.?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Heck if just the anti-religious members of the Digg community showed up to see the movie it probably would have beat "Fireproof" easily.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2008 21:16:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: &amp;#8216;Fireproof&amp;#8217; Earns Twice As Much As &amp;#8216;Religulous&amp;#8217;</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/8216fireproof8217_earns_twice_as_much_as_8216religulous8217/#comment-21638380</link><description>Of course they're comparable. They came out a week apart and they were diametrically opposed in their points of view. The commercials for Religulous pitched it as being funny, and you'd think that Maher has a pretty big fan base.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Then again, maybe not so much.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;With all the pro/anti religion verbosity permeating the internet in general and specifically in regards to this election, I would have thought Religulous would have done much better.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2008 18:04:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: &amp;#8216;Fireproof&amp;#8217; Earns Twice As Much As &amp;#8216;Religulous&amp;#8217;</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/8216fireproof8217_earns_twice_as_much_as_8216religulous8217/#comment-21638377</link><description>@michael&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Apparently this one does.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2008 17:05:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: &amp;#8216;Fireproof&amp;#8217; Earns Twice As Much As &amp;#8216;Religulous&amp;#8217;</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/8216fireproof8217_earns_twice_as_much_as_8216religulous8217/#comment-21638375</link><description>Regarding Maher: About 10-12 years ago he *seemed* to be more even-handed (that or back then I was more aligned with his views) and I enjoyed watching his late night TV show. I had the chance to go see him live and took my wife - we had great seats and were looking forward to his stand up routine.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But when he came onstage it was one f-bomb after another. I mean I'm from Jersey and I used to cuss up a storm with the best of 'em, but I did not expect this at all and was actually embarrassed I'd brought my wife to see him.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It was nothing like the TV show... more like he was trying to out-Murphy Eddie Murphy's "Raw" stage show.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Changed my opinion of the guy on the spot.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2008 16:56:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: &amp;#8216;Fireproof&amp;#8217; Earns Twice As Much As &amp;#8216;Religulous&amp;#8217;</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/8216fireproof8217_earns_twice_as_much_as_8216religulous8217/#comment-21638371</link><description>Warning up front: If the comments get out of line with personal attacks or insults from either side in this thread - I'll drop them faster than a bad habit.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;We managed to have a civil conversation regarding "Expelled" and I hope we can do the same here.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2008 15:59:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: International Trailer For Harry Potter And The Half-Blood Prince</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/international_trailer_for_harry_potter_and_the_half_blood_prince/#comment-21638357</link><description>Again, of COURSE a movie based on a book can be critiqued on its own. A movie is a stand alone piece of work, regardless if it was based on an older movie, TV show, short story or novel.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;You can say you don't like how certain aspects were CHANGED, but you shouldn't have to read a book as a prerequisite to seeing a film.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;What I might agree with is that a review would be influenced by someone having read the book, and that would cause them to look at the film differently - which would be of greater interest to fans of the source material.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But it's not a requirement.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 22:03:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: International Trailer For Harry Potter And The Half-Blood Prince</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/international_trailer_for_harry_potter_and_the_half_blood_prince/#comment-21638341</link><description>@mattali&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Doh! I missed that. :-P&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Glad to have you join us here, BTW. Always happy to have another intelligent, well-spoken commenter join the fray.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 16:23:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: International Trailer For Harry Potter And The Half-Blood Prince</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/international_trailer_for_harry_potter_and_the_half_blood_prince/#comment-21638339</link><description>@mattali&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;First off, Rob is not reviewing a movie - he's just talking about a movie trailer. And what is the purpose of a movie trailer? To introduce an upcoming film &lt;em&gt;to people who don't know anything about it.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Rob doesn't review movies here at Screen Rant, he just covers movie news. I can tell you that when I review a movie (and no doubt most other reviewers do the same) I do not go do "research" before writing a review. I go see the movie, note what I like or dislike about it, how it impacts me, then I go home and write a review. I take it in just as the average person would.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Now if this were a Harry Potter website I would agree with you 100% on the need to be familiar with the books. :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Best regards,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 15:57:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: International Trailer For Harry Potter And The Half-Blood Prince</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/international_trailer_for_harry_potter_and_the_half_blood_prince/#comment-21638337</link><description>@mattali&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Sorry, a prerequisite for reviewing a movie (or heck, even TALKING about it) does not necessarily include having read the book it is based on.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;A movie should work as a standalone piece of storytelling for people who are not familiar with the source material.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 13:04:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: International Trailer For Harry Potter And The Half-Blood Prince</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/international_trailer_for_harry_potter_and_the_half_blood_prince/#comment-21638323</link><description>@Anthony&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Um, TWILIGHT opens this year, Harry Potter opens next year. The ads are for Twilight. :-P&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 16:58:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: International Trailer For Harry Potter And The Half-Blood Prince</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/international_trailer_for_harry_potter_and_the_half_blood_prince/#comment-21638319</link><description>@Michael&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The writers' strike causes a delayed reaction. No writing happening earlier this year affects movies that wouldn't have been released until next summer. So there is a dearth of "big" movies coming out and Warners decided to use this one to fill in that gap.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 14:37:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: International Trailer For Harry Potter And The Half-Blood Prince</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/international_trailer_for_harry_potter_and_the_half_blood_prince/#comment-21638317</link><description>I understand the frustration - I feel that way myself about J.J. Abrams' "Star Trek" being pushed back a similar amount of time from this December to next May.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But as to accusations of "greedy studios," folks need to remember that a movie studio is a *business* above all else (believe it or not). They spend millions to make movies and the goal is to make as much money as possible from that investment.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;For a studio it's death to not have at least a couple of big summer movies, and with the writers' strike delaying so many productions, things are being shuffled to fill the Summer '09 vacuum.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 13:55:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Let The Right One In Review</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/let_the_right_one_in_review/#comment-21638277</link><description>@Thrusting&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Well to each his own. Here at Screen Rant most of us HATED Transformers while most people seemed to love it.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Maybe you'll enjoy Twilight.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 09 Nov 2008 13:42:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Let The Right One In Review</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/let_the_right_one_in_review/#comment-21638273</link><description>American version of this = gag me.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I'm looking forward to seeing this when it arrives on DVD.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Great review, Kofi.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2008 21:26:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Clint Eastwood&amp;#8217;s Gran Torino Looks Amazing</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/clint_eastwood8217s_gran_torino_looks_amazing/#comment-21638231</link><description>@Cali&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;True, that's another film it reminded me. It was sort of "Dirty Harry retires and turns into Death Wish." :-P&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 25 Oct 2008 18:02:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Stargate Universe Concept Art &amp;amp; (Weak?) Details</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/stargate_universe_concept_art_amp_weak_details/#comment-21638220</link><description>The execution on Voyager was terrible. Conflicting decisions by Janeway regarding the Prime Directive vs getting her crew home, the ship not deteriorating at ALL externally despite no where to go for maintenance for years in hostile territory, no long term planning in case the voyage DID take 60 years, characters who had their "balls" surgicially removed (Chakotay, Torres), etc., etc.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 25 Oct 2008 12:50:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Punisher: War Zone Update</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/punisher_war_zone_update/#comment-21638201</link><description>Criminy gang, can we relax a little about this? If we can have Rambo, John McClane, almost every character Arnold Schwarzenneger has played, etc., I'd think we can cut this movie a little slack in the "realism" department.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 21:14:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Punisher: War Zone Update</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/punisher_war_zone_update/#comment-21638175</link><description>OK, people, play nice. I really hate having to shut down comment threads. We all have particular films that we're passionate about but let's not get in each other's faces about it.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2008 10:27:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Punisher: War Zone Update</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/punisher_war_zone_update/#comment-21638135</link><description>@Ken J&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;One of my favorite "annoying" things about guns in movies is how when the hero(es) come upon a possibly dangerous situation, they suddenly cock their guns.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I would think that anyone in that line of work would already have a bullet chambered. No doubt it's done for the "cool factor."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 25 Oct 2008 12:47:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Mid-Week Movie News Wrap Up &amp;#8211; Oct. 2, 2008</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/mid_week_movie_news_wrap_up_8211_oct_2_2008/#comment-21635975</link><description>Punisher War Zone will be rated R.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Was there ever really any doubt?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 21:23:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Star Wars Mythos Continues With The Clone Wars</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/the_star_wars_mythos_continues_with_the_clone_wars/#comment-21635919</link><description>I've been done with Star Wars for a LONG time.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 18:02:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Discussion &amp;#8211; October 1, 2008</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/open_discussion_8211_october_1_2008/#comment-21635892</link><description>@blipvert&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I have found that most TV shows that I enjoyed when I was much younger are best left in my memories. Inevitably I'm disappointed when I try to re-watch them today.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;There are a few exceptions of course: Classic Star Trek, I Love Lucy and The Twilight Zone are a few that come to mind that for me stand the test of time.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 17:52:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Discussion &amp;#8211; October 1, 2008</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/open_discussion_8211_october_1_2008/#comment-21635855</link><description>I've heard the same rumors. And just when I was really getting into it...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 15:10:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Discussion &amp;#8211; October 1, 2008</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/open_discussion_8211_october_1_2008/#comment-21635852</link><description>@Zipper&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I haven't been using it much due to the lack of selection of decent movies - they had TONS of really obscure, off-beat flicks for viewing.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;However news just came out today that they teamed up with Starz and added thousands of their movies to their titles available for instant streaming.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The downside is that you don't get HD quality watching it on a big screen TV. I would say the quality may even be a bit less than DVD, but then again I haven't watched newer films via Roku, so that may not be a fair assessment.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 13:25:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: SR (International) Picks: JCVD &amp;amp; Let The Right One In</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/sr_international_picks_jcvd_amp_let_the_right_one_in/#comment-21635846</link><description>Couple of great looking suggestions there. I've heard amazing things about "Let the Right One In" and the Van Damme film looks fascinating.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 00:00:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Green Lantern To Start Shooting In Spring</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/green_lantern_to_start_shooting_in_spring/#comment-21635836</link><description>@Daniel&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I was yanking your chain. :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Just saying, the space factor won't necessarily make it not do well. You have a good point though, it seems that superhero movies are leaning towards "realistic" so it'll be interesting to see how a superhero movie involving aliens and such out of the ordinary powers will do.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 15:12:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Green Lantern To Start Shooting In Spring</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/green_lantern_to_start_shooting_in_spring/#comment-21635833</link><description>@Daniel&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I've got two words for you:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Star. Wars.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;:-P&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 13:20:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Toy Story Trilogy In 3D (And Unchanged)</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/toy_story_trilogy_in_3d_and_unchanged/#comment-21635824</link><description>I've always been a HUGE Pixar supporter, but for me Wall-E was the first bump in the road. I just didn't like that they went away from their usual family/friends message and branched out into the whole climate change debate.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I also didn't like the mix of live action and CGI - it didn't make sense in the way they employed it.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Other than that, big fan and looking forward to what they do with John Carter of Mars.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 15:10:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Transformers 2 Shot For Imax</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/transformers_2_shot_for_imax/#comment-21635814</link><description>@Rolando&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Um, what?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;A standard IMAX screen is 72ft wide x 53ft tall and some are even larger. A regular movie screen starts at about 26ft wide by 15ft tall.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;That means that as far as square footage an IMAX screen is about TEN TIMES LARGER than a standard screen.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;So yeah, not much bigger. ;-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 16:19:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Transformers 2 Shot For Imax</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/transformers_2_shot_for_imax/#comment-21635811</link><description>@790&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;ROFLMAO!!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thanks for the laugh, buddy. :-D&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 23:58:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Transformers 2 Shot For Imax</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/transformers_2_shot_for_imax/#comment-21635809</link><description>@INK&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Yeah, right... moneybags. Good one.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I pick and choose which pre-screenings I attend for movie reviews because even though they're free they're so far away it costs me $12 in gas round trip (and I have a 4 cylinder car).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;:-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 17:26:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Transformers 2 Shot For Imax</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/transformers_2_shot_for_imax/#comment-21635806</link><description>@INK&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I drive 45 miles to get to my nearest IMAX. Totally worth it.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 15:57:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Updated Marvel Movie Release Dates</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/updated_marvel_movie_release_dates/#comment-21635787</link><description>Hearing Branagh possibly attached to direct Thor gets me a bit more stoked about it, although I've never been a big fan of the character. I also agree with Favreau in that I don't think he could mesh well with a more reality-based Avengers movie.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 19:03:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Updated Marvel Movie Release Dates</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/updated_marvel_movie_release_dates/#comment-21635780</link><description>It's funny... people talk about overseas hatred of the U.S. like it's a new thing.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I remember visiting Portugal (where my parents are from) over 20 years ago, sitting in a cafe and when some young twenty-somethings discovered my sister and I were American their tone immediately changed.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;"Ohhhh, your from Amerrrrrica. Where the streets are paved with gold."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Being from New Jersey, my reply was:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;"What the hell does THAT mean? Have you ever been there? I work just as hard to earn a living as you do - probably HARDER."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;So other countries can hate the U.S. as much as they like. Doesn't bother me one damned bit. I'm used to it.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 17:31:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Kenneth Branagh To Direct Thor?</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/kenneth_branagh_to_direct_thor/#comment-21635744</link><description>@Daniel&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Oh it was not "retarded." It was fun and purely innocent in its approach to humor. RottenTomatoes has it at rated at 7/10 and Metacritic at 6.5/10.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Not a home run but far from being liked by people with the mentality of 5 year olds.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;On a side note, you really do need to work on your people skills. I just said I really liked it and you turn around and say it was aimed at people with the mentality of 5 year olds.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I mean, seriously dude.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Yeesh.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 15:16:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Kenneth Branagh To Direct Thor?</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/kenneth_branagh_to_direct_thor/#comment-21635741</link><description>@Daniel&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I *loved* Elf. Are you a Christmas cynic? :-P&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It's actually the only movie in which I really love Will Ferrell's performance.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 12:55:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Nottingham: Not To Say We Told You So, But&amp;#8230;</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/nottingham_not_to_say_we_told_you_so_but8230/#comment-21635724</link><description>Um, because we're sick of remakes, this isn't a sci-fi/action/superhero movie and we're not Russel Crowe fanatics?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;:-P&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 22:12:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Weekend Movie News Wrap Up: September 28, 2008</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/weekend_movie_news_wrap_up_september_28_2008/#comment-21635715</link><description>Bummer. I saw a trailer for it recently and it looked really good.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 28 Sep 2008 23:39:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Dark Knight Blu-ray Revealed</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/the_dark_knight_blu_ray_revealed/#comment-21635707</link><description>LOL, no worries. BTW, I actually canceled my Stan Winston life-sized Iron Man bust order.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;My wife was very pleased. :-P&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 22:24:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Dark Knight Blu-ray Revealed</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/the_dark_knight_blu_ray_revealed/#comment-21635705</link><description>HOMER&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I just picked up a 60" Sony HDTV and DirecTV HD/DVR and I thank the heavens my wife let me get those. :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I've got a wife, daughter, mortgage, private school, etc., etc.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;You obviously think this site is WAY more profitable than it is. Believe me it's not. I work a day job and run other sites as well to make ends meet.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I'd hate to think about how little I get paid here if I calculated it down to an hourly rate!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 17:05:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Dark Knight Blu-ray Revealed</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/the_dark_knight_blu_ray_revealed/#comment-21635699</link><description>@wingnut&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;That's what I hear - now I just have to convince my wife, lol.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;@kyyle23&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I'm 90% sure I will be giving away TDK DVDs soon. :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 28 Sep 2008 18:27:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Shane Black To Direct Lethal Weapon 5?</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/shane_black_to_direct_lethal_weapon_5/#comment-21635678</link><description>@INK&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;LOL, I didn't select that pic. You can thank Niall for that one. :-P&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 13:38:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Shane Black To Direct Lethal Weapon 5?</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/shane_black_to_direct_lethal_weapon_5/#comment-21635674</link><description>@Julie&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;LOL, I'm 47 and I run this site. :-P&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I just think this is yet another case of dipping into a very old franchise for the sake of squeezing a final bit of cash out of it.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Although I'm a huge fan of the first one and I think I liked the second (don't remember, really), I have no desire to see this.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Honestly, considering where Mel is at in his life right now I can't picture him doing this.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 10:29:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Shane Black To Direct Lethal Weapon 5?</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/shane_black_to_direct_lethal_weapon_5/#comment-21635665</link><description>Beyond the fact that I think this would look like self-parody with these guys at their age holstering up for another Lethal Weapon movie, I couldn't stomach watching Danny Glover on the big screen considering his worship of Hugo Chavez.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The guy is a freaking moron IMO.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 27 Sep 2008 13:33:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: New Spirit Trailer Still Looks Goofy</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/new_spirit_trailer_still_looks_goofy/#comment-21635641</link><description>@The Mantis&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;This looks as different from Watchmen as night and day. NO COMPARISON whatsoever.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 27 Sep 2008 18:16:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: What&amp;#8217;s Happening With The Superman Sequel?</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/what8217s_happening_with_the_superman_sequel/#comment-21635603</link><description>@Brian&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I will leave it up to Jamie (the author of this post) to defend his position once he gets back online.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 27 Sep 2008 23:46:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: What&amp;#8217;s Happening With The Superman Sequel?</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/what8217s_happening_with_the_superman_sequel/#comment-21635600</link><description>To those of you saying a "squeaky clean" hero won't work in this day and age, what do you think of the concept of the Captain America movie that Marvel will be putting out in a couple of years? He falls under the same category.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I do agree that he's been portrayed as kind of a boring character - and the problem is that the attempts to humanize him or show internal conflict have made him seem weak and weepy.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I'd rather see him struggle against the idea of using his power to just take everything over and "rule" us instead of getting all goofy over Lois Lane.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 27 Sep 2008 12:43:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: What&amp;#8217;s Happening With The Superman Sequel?</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/what8217s_happening_with_the_superman_sequel/#comment-21635598</link><description>@helena&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I didn't write this, one of my guys did. But you should know that I personally think that Tom Welling would make a GREAT Superman - problem is the Smallville connection/baggage.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I think it's a bummer, myself, especially as I think he's really going to come into his own this season on the show.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 27 Sep 2008 12:40:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: What&amp;#8217;s Happening With The Superman Sequel?</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/what8217s_happening_with_the_superman_sequel/#comment-21635589</link><description>@Brian&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I can vouch for the fact that this is not just based on opinion and there is in fact a source. As of right now everything in this article is ACCURATE.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 27 Sep 2008 00:40:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Eagle Eye Review</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/eagle_eye_review/#comment-21635559</link><description>Well Smitty I didn't give it a terrible review. 3.5/5 is above average and a lot higher than most others rated it. :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 18 Oct 2008 00:48:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Eagle Eye Review</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/eagle_eye_review/#comment-21635547</link><description>They're just not accepting any new reviewers right now. I bug 'em once in a while about it. :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 27 Sep 2008 23:46:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Eagle Eye Review</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/eagle_eye_review/#comment-21635545</link><description>@Oscar&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thanks, I've been trying to get on their list for a long time, but they haven't added anyone new in since forever.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 27 Sep 2008 12:50:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Eagle Eye Review</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/eagle_eye_review/#comment-21635543</link><description>@Oscar Glad you enjoyed it, I tried to indicate in my review that I didn't hate it (hence the 3.5/5 which is more than what most reviewers are giving it).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;@greenknight&lt;br&gt;No, the don't, hence my comment. :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 27 Sep 2008 12:36:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Is James Bond Still Bond Without His Classic Lines?</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/is_james_bond_still_bond_without_his_classic_lines/#comment-21635531</link><description>@Gary&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Oh, of course - it just makes me a bit melancholy is all.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 27 Sep 2008 12:45:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Is James Bond Still Bond Without His Classic Lines?</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/is_james_bond_still_bond_without_his_classic_lines/#comment-21635527</link><description>@M&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Despite your being snarky about it, thank you for the correction.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2008 13:41:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Is James Bond Still Bond Without His Classic Lines?</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/is_james_bond_still_bond_without_his_classic_lines/#comment-21635520</link><description>Yup, I've seen PG-13 films where they get away with ONE f-bomb.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Then again, it wouldn't be very James Bondian, now would it.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2008 17:16:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: I Am (Not Yet) Legend?</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/i_am_not_yet_legend/#comment-21635506</link><description>@Paige&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I actually thought it was pretty good myself. Of course I saw it in IMAX, and that always seems to add at least a half a star to my reviews. :-P&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2008 22:52:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: I Am (Not Yet) Legend?</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/i_am_not_yet_legend/#comment-21635501</link><description>Rob, very good! I missed that in my edit but I've changed it. :-P&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2008 12:20:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Screen Rant Readers Invited To Spike Scream Awards!</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/screen_rant_readers_invited_to_spike_scream_awards/#comment-21635477</link><description>@790&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Unfortunately (in more ways than one) I don't have anyone who lives in the LA area writing for the site.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 28 Sep 2008 11:40:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why I Loved Iron Man More Than The Dark Knight</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/why_i_loved_iron_man_more_than_the_dark_knight/#comment-21635468</link><description>&lt;em&gt;"Oh, so the politicians who fight for your rights every day on capital hill, desperately trying to pass laws that benefit you and your family deserve scorn then, is that it?"&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If you really believe this you are incredibly naive about what goes on in Washington.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Based on comments from a few people here it's becoming blatantly obvious to me that an entire generation having been raised without having to sacrifice much due to the plenty in the U.S. has created a skewed vision of the world and people in general.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I think I've seen enough in this thread - it's way jumped the tracks and it's just starting to aggravate me.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 10:35:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why I Loved Iron Man More Than The Dark Knight</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/why_i_loved_iron_man_more_than_the_dark_knight/#comment-21635461</link><description>@Amol&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Someone sacrificing their life for another is MASS HYSTERIA? &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I'm not even going to respond to that. I'm done talking to you about this.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Man oh man...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 23:20:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why I Loved Iron Man More Than The Dark Knight</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/why_i_loved_iron_man_more_than_the_dark_knight/#comment-21635450</link><description>@Amol&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I'm not going to read your two massive posts, but will just say that all you have to do is look at soldiers in battle sacrificing their lives for those of their comrades and that blows a huge hole in anyone's "no one is altruistic" theory.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I'm done.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 05 Oct 2008 13:41:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why I Loved Iron Man More Than The Dark Knight</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/why_i_loved_iron_man_more_than_the_dark_knight/#comment-21635435</link><description>@Amol&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;In regards to your last post: Hallelujah! You finally got it! :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;However in regards to this:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;em&gt;"Nobody is altruistic."&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Bull.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It may be more rare than not, but there ARE certainly altruistic people. People who self-sacrifice for others expecting nothing in return.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;As to your analysis of Agnostics, I disagree. That's not a "life view," it's only a view about the existance (or not) of God.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I still think it's ridiculous to be an atheist - how can you know for sure, beyond the shadow of a doubt that there is no God? Do you know everything there is to be known in the universe? Has mankind unraveled every mystery of the universe? Are there no more unknowns to be discovered/explored? If so, how the heck can you KNOW there is no God?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Someone saying they know for a fact is a ridiculous conceit and displays and incredible amount of hubris IMHO.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;You can choose to believe that there's little difference between yourself and a monkey or a pig, but I do not.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It's incredible to me that anyone who can sit in front of the technology we've created, typing on a keyboard, staring at a 1" thick LCD screen, connected to the internet via fiber optic cables, debating something on an intellectual and philosophical level can not see how very different we are from other species.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I mean, seriously. Why aren't we just scrabbling in the dirt for our next meal, still living in caves if we're "just mammals?"&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I know you'll reply with another 500 word response and remain unconvinced, but I just had to express my opinion on this.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 04 Oct 2008 13:43:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why I Loved Iron Man More Than The Dark Knight</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/why_i_loved_iron_man_more_than_the_dark_knight/#comment-21635426</link><description>@Amol&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Sorry for any confusion, I was referring to your seeming assertion that it's true here in the real world.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 04 Oct 2008 01:19:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why I Loved Iron Man More Than The Dark Knight</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/why_i_loved_iron_man_more_than_the_dark_knight/#comment-21635423</link><description>@Amol&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Your item #2. Wrong. Completely.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 23:50:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why I Loved Iron Man More Than The Dark Knight</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/why_i_loved_iron_man_more_than_the_dark_knight/#comment-21635414</link><description>LOL, yeah, hows it look for the site owner to take a comment thread wildly off topic...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 12:35:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why I Loved Iron Man More Than The Dark Knight</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/why_i_loved_iron_man_more_than_the_dark_knight/#comment-21635412</link><description>BTW, sorry if my first reply was harsh. I think this whole political season and all the nastiness floating about the internets has my back up.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 12:09:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Review: Heroes Season 3 Premiere</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/review_heroes_season_3_premiere/#comment-21634960</link><description>Guys, don't feel bad. I found out a couple of days after the premiere that I somehow missed the last 10 minutes!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;That's why my review ends at the scene where Suresh is peeling scabs off his back - I missed the Sylar revelation, talking turtle, future painter African guy and all that!!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2008 15:48:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Review: Heroes Season 3 Premiere</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/review_heroes_season_3_premiere/#comment-21634948</link><description>@Realmwalker&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thanks for bringing some balance to this story.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2008 10:23:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Review: Heroes Season 3 Premiere</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/review_heroes_season_3_premiere/#comment-21634942</link><description>"Then the first episode of Season 3, is 'Hello… do you want to smoke another crack pipe with me?'"&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;LMAO!! :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;You know, I think my wife would agree - she was kind of confused by the whole thing.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2008 00:21:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Review: Heroes Season 3 Premiere</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/review_heroes_season_3_premiere/#comment-21634939</link><description>@Gary&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;You REALLY need to change the email address you're using when you comment here. Your inbox is full and I continually receive Mail Delivery Error messages from every post in which you've commented. I'm tired of getting all those so PLEASE use a VALID email address to comment!!!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2008 22:58:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Two New Spirit Posters Better Than The Movie?</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/two_new_spirit_posters_better_than_the_movie/#comment-21634843</link><description>I went back and re-read what I wrote - and don't ask me why, but I was VERY gentle when I wrote my reaction to what I saw at Comic-Con.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I think maybe I was just stunned by what I had just seen, and couldn't wrap my brain around how truly awful it looked while sitting there staring at the legendary Frank Miller on stage.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Believe me, this thing looks like it has "stinker" written all over it. I'd be happy to be wrong - but I don't think I will be.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 21 Sep 2008 01:07:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Towelhead Review</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/towelhead_review/#comment-21634840</link><description>@Michael&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Point taken - I defer to your experience.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 28 Sep 2008 18:25:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Towelhead Review</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/towelhead_review/#comment-21634831</link><description>&lt;em&gt;"funny that a B-Film is defined so malleable."&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Indeed. Although I disagree with your idea that genre automatically defines a movie as a "B."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;You're making me think too hard about a topic I consider inconsequential. :-P&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2008 10:40:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Towelhead Review</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/towelhead_review/#comment-21634827</link><description>Back at 'cha, Kurt. :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2008 20:42:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Towelhead Review</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/towelhead_review/#comment-21634825</link><description>@Kurt&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Ah, now we're getting down to our different point of views. I don't consider Raiders, Jaws, or Star Wars B-movies. (Well, I suppose the first Star Wars strays pretty close to the line).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;When I think of B-movies, I think primarily of the classic examples of movies from the 1950s that were really shlocky and cheesy - movies where they had monsters that were obviously guys in rubber suits and that sort of thing. Movies that are unintentionally silly, not necessarily movies that set out to be silly. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;To my mind, modern B-movie are films like Grindhouse (intentional, yes), the recent Death Race movie (although I haven't seen it) and pretty much any horror/sci-fi direct-to-DVD movie that you'll find on the shelves of your local blockbuster.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2008 19:11:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Towelhead Review</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/towelhead_review/#comment-21634823</link><description>@Kurt&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Oh come on... now you're getting ridiculous. By it's very definition a B-movie is relatively inexpensive and/or schlocky:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/B-movie" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/B-movie&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Your definition of B-movie is outside the range of what most people would consider one.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And speaking of dailies, I don't buy that for a second. How many utterly crappy movies have made it to the big screen where the dailies MUST have been screaming "THIS MOVIE SUCKS" yet everyone involved was seemingly oblivious to that fact.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2008 17:59:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Towelhead Review</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/towelhead_review/#comment-21634820</link><description>One of my absolute BIGGEST pet peeves in the movie industry is when they mis-market (or purposely mislead people via commercials/trailers) a movie.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;A perception of what the film will be about sometimes colors my opinion of said film.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Sure, a movie can overcome that, but for the most part movies don't, and the subterfuge is because the movie in fact sucks but they're trying to put butts in seats on opening weekend before word gets out.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;There's a way to market a B-movie - you make the commercials/trailers seem at least a bit funny/goofy or over the top. But with this film it was obviously supposed to be another "serious" sci-fi/horror film in the tradition of M. Night's previous work.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And as INK stated: B-movies don't cost $60MM. I don't believe for a second the studio set out for this to be a B-movie. They just ended up with an idiotic stinker and employed spin-control IMHO.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2008 17:09:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Towelhead Review</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/towelhead_review/#comment-21634815</link><description>@Kurt&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Didn't see The Mist. Thing is, neither of those were marketed as "goofy-serious B-films" and that's the last thing one would expect from the uber-serious Shyamalan.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I think he fell back on that as an explanation after it bombed.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2008 16:31:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Body of Lies Review</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/body_of_lies_review/#comment-21636978</link><description>@Daniel&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I agree completely, although I put this film on a different level from the sorts of films you're talking about (Redacted, In the Valley of Elah, etc.).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2008 23:20:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Body of Lies Review</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/body_of_lies_review/#comment-21636977</link><description>@Shawnna&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I realize that, but my point is that they did place him in a role that required facial hair and I think it's partially to make him look older.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2008 23:14:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Body of Lies Review</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/body_of_lies_review/#comment-21636971</link><description>Yeah, I have to say that thought bothered me throughout the film. But it very well may not be too far from the truth.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Here's a recommendation: Watch "Charlie Wilson's War" on DVD. Finally saw it this evening and thought it was excellent. I was expecting some negative portrayal of the main character and came away very suprised.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2008 00:39:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: New Punisher War Zone Clip: A &amp;#8216;Thank You&amp;#8217; Or Damage Control?</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/new_punisher_war_zone_clip_a_8216thank_you8217_or_damage_control/#comment-21636966</link><description>@Ken J&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I'm sure the gunfire sound effects will be sufficient at the movie theater. :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2008 14:04:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: New Punisher War Zone Clip: A &amp;#8216;Thank You&amp;#8217; Or Damage Control?</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/new_punisher_war_zone_clip_a_8216thank_you8217_or_damage_control/#comment-21636952</link><description>@Rampage&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thanks for the correction. I've changed the post but left the plug for the site. :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 11 Oct 2008 17:47:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: New Punisher War Zone Clip: A &amp;#8216;Thank You&amp;#8217; Or Damage Control?</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/new_punisher_war_zone_clip_a_8216thank_you8217_or_damage_control/#comment-21636948</link><description>Hey Nomad, nice to have you back. :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Yeah, I don't think I've ever seen as much dirty laundry aired during the production of a film as I have with this one...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 11 Oct 2008 15:58:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Finally: First Full Star Trek Trailer In November</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/finally_first_full_star_trek_trailer_in_november/#comment-21636938</link><description>Quantum is the last movie I'm really looking forward to this year.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Nothing after that of interest for me, really. Punisher will be more of a curiosity thing. And is the Keanu suckfest this December or next? I forget...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 00:05:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Finally: First Full Star Trek Trailer In November</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/finally_first_full_star_trek_trailer_in_november/#comment-21636936</link><description>Hey Gang, just read over on TrekMovie that it will be attached to...... Quantum of Solace!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;As if I didn't already have enough reason to go see the next Bond flick. :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 23:52:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Finally: First Full Star Trek Trailer In November</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/finally_first_full_star_trek_trailer_in_november/#comment-21636928</link><description>@Rob&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I'm not going to try to pinpoint box office numbers for Twilight, even experts at that sort of thing don't know how it's going to do. I do have a feeling it won't have a problem hitting at list the high 30s on opening weekend.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;As far as Bond, it'll probably do low 40s I think. Generally sequels to well received previous films tend to make similar box office to the first film on opening weekend.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I agree with Gary's logic - I'm thinking Paramount wants to bring a new, young generation into the fold with this Trek movie.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2008 14:03:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Finally: First Full Star Trek Trailer In November</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/finally_first_full_star_trek_trailer_in_november/#comment-21636920</link><description>Rob,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I also think you're underestimating Twilight. It has a HUGE fanbase and will no doubt open very big.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 11 Oct 2008 13:11:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Finally: First Full Star Trek Trailer In November</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/finally_first_full_star_trek_trailer_in_november/#comment-21636913</link><description>I think Twilight would be a good bet. They're trying to bring a brand new audience to the franchise and they're definitely skewing it young, so it would be a good match.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Oh man... does this mean I might have to go see Twilight??? :-P&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 11 Oct 2008 00:13:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Will Brandon Routh Appear In The Green Lantern Movie?</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/will_brandon_routh_appear_in_the_green_lantern_movie/#comment-21636899</link><description>So K dizzy I guess that means you didn't like either The Dark Knight, Iron Man or Spider-Man since they all wear masks?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I mean Hal Jordan is the original Green Lantern.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 20:45:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Cool Punisher: War Zone Poster</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/cool_punisher_war_zone_poster/#comment-21636867</link><description>@Rampage&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Ok, fixed it for you. Thanks for the nudge. :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 16:07:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Cool Punisher: War Zone Poster</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/cool_punisher_war_zone_poster/#comment-21636866</link><description>@Rampage&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Because I haven't gotten around to changing it. :-P&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 15:58:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: New Twilight Trailer And Images [Updated - HD version]</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/new_twilight_trailer_and_images_updated_hd_version/#comment-21636802</link><description>Post updated with a larger version of the trailer.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 12:12:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: New Twilight Trailer And Images [Updated - HD version]</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/new_twilight_trailer_and_images_updated_hd_version/#comment-21636796</link><description>@KK&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Yeah, almost forgot to add that to this post!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2008 15:07:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Is Ryan Gosling The Green Lantern?</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/is_ryan_gosling_the_green_lantern/#comment-21636782</link><description>@Oren Reich&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;You make a valid point but in comic book fan circles the comparison between the two characters has been made for MANY years due to their both being ordinary men granted extraordinary powers via technology. Take away the tech and their powers go away, making the similarly vulnerable.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2008 14:05:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Is Ryan Gosling The Green Lantern?</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/is_ryan_gosling_the_green_lantern/#comment-21636779</link><description>@The Glove&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I'm sure they'll change the costume for the movie to make it look cool for live action.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 10:10:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Studios Ramp Up Production Prior To SAG Strike</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/studios_ramp_up_production_prior_to_sag_strike/#comment-21636765</link><description>Can you imagine two TV seasons in a row being cut short by Hollywood strikes??&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Yikes.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 17:18:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Max Payne &amp;amp; Punisher 2 Movie Sites Updated</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/max_payne_amp_punisher_2_movie_sites_updated/#comment-21636758</link><description>It's not technically Punisher 2, but that's what it was known as for a while.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2008 17:09:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Marvel Announces The Avengers&amp;#8230; Cartoon</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/marvel_announces_the_avengers8230_cartoon/#comment-21636754</link><description>@Darnell&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Gotta say I agree on JL vs JLU. I really enjoyed the first two seasons, but when it went to the "Unlimited" version of the show... I don't know what they were thinking.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 15:55:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Marvel Announces The Avengers&amp;#8230; Cartoon</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/marvel_announces_the_avengers8230_cartoon/#comment-21636750</link><description>@sononsj&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Are talking about the most recent one where they portrayed him as a "tween?" The concept didn't appeal to me, never saw it.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2008 10:13:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Marvel Announces The Avengers&amp;#8230; Cartoon</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/marvel_announces_the_avengers8230_cartoon/#comment-21636739</link><description>Marvel has just not gotten it in the past when it comes to animated TV series. Heck, look what they just did with Iron Man - they used the MOST REVILED chapter in the history of the Iron Man comic book:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Teen Tony.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Ugh.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 14:58:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Discussion &amp;#8211; October 8, 2008</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/open_discussion_8211_october_8_2008/#comment-21636733</link><description>Gary, yeah... I need to write up a review for Body of Lies and I hope to see City of Ember this weekend.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Honestly, review writing is one of my least favorite things to do - but do it I must. :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Hint, Body of Lies was very, very good.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 11 Oct 2008 00:41:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Discussion &amp;#8211; October 8, 2008</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/open_discussion_8211_october_8_2008/#comment-21636728</link><description>We don't keep up with horror flicks as much as other genres, sorry about that.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;We need more writers. :-0&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2008 11:56:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Discussion &amp;#8211; October 8, 2008</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/open_discussion_8211_october_8_2008/#comment-21636726</link><description>Hadn't heard that, I see the fraud page has been taken down. Might be B.S.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2008 10:52:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Discussion &amp;#8211; October 8, 2008</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/open_discussion_8211_october_8_2008/#comment-21636711</link><description>@Dan&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Alex is a friend of mine but I put more stock in the script reviews by Latino Review. :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 13:40:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Discussion &amp;#8211; October 8, 2008</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/open_discussion_8211_october_8_2008/#comment-21636706</link><description>@790&lt;br&gt;Within the context of that interview I believe Orci/Kurtman were referring to the epic quality of the way the space scenes were shot in the original Star Wars.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;@Ken J&lt;br&gt;You're describing ST:TNG/Picard not ST:TOS/Kirk. :-P&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I'm a Kirk fan, not Jean-Luc "I rule by committee" Picard.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 11:10:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Is Heroes Season 3 Awesome Or Ridiculous?</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/is_heroes_season_3_awesome_or_ridiculous/#comment-21636635</link><description>I thought tonight's episode was quite good, although I'm still not buying the extreme villain/hero reversal in some of the characters. It's too extreme.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2008 00:22:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Is Heroes Season 3 Awesome Or Ridiculous?</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/is_heroes_season_3_awesome_or_ridiculous/#comment-21636632</link><description>@John&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Sorry about that, don't know how it happened. I've fixed the link. :-P&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 20 Oct 2008 15:47:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Is Heroes Season 3 Awesome Or Ridiculous?</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/is_heroes_season_3_awesome_or_ridiculous/#comment-21636630</link><description>Sci-Fi Channel chimes in on this:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;A "Heroes" Intervention &lt;a href="http://twurl.nl/shhg30" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://twurl.nl/shhg30&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;:-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 20 Oct 2008 14:17:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Is Heroes Season 3 Awesome Or Ridiculous?</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/is_heroes_season_3_awesome_or_ridiculous/#comment-21636585</link><description>Thanks for the Peter/Sylar clarification, guys.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2008 10:12:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Is Heroes Season 3 Awesome Or Ridiculous?</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/is_heroes_season_3_awesome_or_ridiculous/#comment-21636576</link><description>I'm enjoying Sylar a lot this season, I think more than any of the other characters, who are seeming more and more wooden.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 21:39:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Is Heroes Season 3 Awesome Or Ridiculous?</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/is_heroes_season_3_awesome_or_ridiculous/#comment-21636568</link><description>@mootaku (love that name, BTW)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Not aimed at anyone specifically - I'm just observing the tone of the overall thread.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 14:30:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Is Heroes Season 3 Awesome Or Ridiculous?</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/is_heroes_season_3_awesome_or_ridiculous/#comment-21636566</link><description>This is a public service message from the guy who runs the site:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Keep the discussion civil - don't make me turn this car around. :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Seriously, let's not start with denigrating each other. I realize we're all passionate about our favorites but we can discuss our differences of opinion without resorting to insults.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 13:41:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Pirates 4: Is Johnny Depp The 56 Million Dollar Man?</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/pirates_4_is_johnny_depp_the_56_million_dollar_man/#comment-21636534</link><description>@Clean Talking Chimp&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;From a business point of view, I guess you're right. If a movie franchise has pulled in over $2 billion, I suppose $56 million to the star makes sense.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But objectively speaking, it's an insane amount of money to be paid for a few months of acting. We can always jump to the old "teachers and law enforcement" comparison/argument.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Not speaking about him personally, but "stars" in general - this is where I want them to shut the hell up when it comes to trying to influence voters and whatnot. What kind of a "normal" worldview does one have when they get paid millions of dollars to star in a movie as opposed to working a real job (yes, I said a "real" job). Directors, cinematographers, VFX people and other crew actually earn their paychecks, but at this level actors don't earn theirs... it's purely a ROI calculation for the studio.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Based on that I have no stomach for them getting on a soap box of any sort.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;(Man, I hate it when I take a thread off topic - can't help myself sometimes.)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2008 14:37:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Is Smallville Season 9 Vaporware?</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/is_smallville_season_9_vaporware/#comment-21636502</link><description>@john&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thanks for the update!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 10:36:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Is Smallville Season 9 Vaporware?</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/is_smallville_season_9_vaporware/#comment-21636491</link><description>@Brian&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Somehow I doubt they'd go with a red "costume" since they've spent 8 seasons of Clark CONSTANTLY in red and blue. 8-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;@Mariko&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Great info! However I have ALWAYS heard that it was Millar and Gough who were behind the no flights/no tights policy (not to say you're wrong, it's just the first I've heard of it coming from Welling - can't blame him on the tights thing, btw).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Considering how radically different the tone of this season is, I find it difficult to believe that Millar and Gough were just figureheads up until now, not guiding the direction of the story arc.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 10:21:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Is Smallville Season 9 Vaporware?</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/is_smallville_season_9_vaporware/#comment-21636479</link><description>The ratings (or lack of ratings) for The CW could be one big reason for renewing Smallville for at least another season.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2008 18:35:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Is Smallville Season 9 Vaporware?</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/is_smallville_season_9_vaporware/#comment-21636464</link><description>Yeah, this season is really coming along nicely. VAST improvement over season 7.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Reminds me of the final season of "Star Trek: Enterprise" when Manny Coto came aboard and it improved big time.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 13:28:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Is Smallville Season 9 Vaporware?</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/is_smallville_season_9_vaporware/#comment-21636432</link><description>I'm pretty sure they're going to break the "no flights" rule this season (FINALLY!) but yeah, with no Lex and the whole secret identity thing it's going to be a tough nut.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I know they're progressing towards the dual identity thing this season but they're going to have to have a huge ace up their sleeves as far as a creative way to pull it off.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;BTW, I didn't like this week's Maxima episode at all. Like watching soft core porn IMHO.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;On the other hand I do like how they've transitioned the Lois and Clark relationship from dislike to affection over the last few seasons. Surprising how well they've handled that.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 13:35:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Is Smallville Season 9 Vaporware?</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/is_smallville_season_9_vaporware/#comment-21636427</link><description>@Blue Sunflower&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;What. Ever.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;There was no "party" to miss. I'm sure I follow a LOT more TV/movie news sites than you do and that comment was barely a blip on the radar. If you do a Google search on a part of that quote you'll find that with the exception of a tiny mention on &lt;a href="http://SupermanHomepage.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;SupermanHomepage.com&lt;/a&gt;, EVERY other instance of it being mentioned on other sites was on FORUMS, and NOT on the main site:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://tinyurl.com/4n5al6" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://tinyurl.com/4n5al6&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;To find the actual quote within the context of the original article you have to pull up the cached version of the HR page, which I've done here:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://tinyurl.com/4xbrsv" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://tinyurl.com/4xbrsv&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I encourage people to click on the second link and read the article for themselves then come back here and tell me how "definitive" it sounds that Smallville will be back for a 9th season.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Also here's Bruce's original statement:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;"Not once &lt;strong&gt;have I seen&lt;/strong&gt; a statement saying that season 9 is approved, hinted at, a go, nothing." [emphasis added]&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;When you pointed out the article, he was polite in his response and you response was to get in his face. He didn't say there wasn't any news out there, just that HE hadn't seen it (and believe me, Bruce is awesome at digging for info).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;BTW, you only quoted PART of her statement, in order to mislead as to how definite her statement was. Here is the FULL quote which makes the whole thing far less certain:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;em&gt;"Reaper" won't necessarily air on Thursdays, she said. As for the perception that the upcoming season will be the last for "Smallville" -- not very accurate.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And the part you omitted:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;em&gt;"You would have said several times during its run that the show is just about dead," Ostroff said. "So I would never count it out."&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Your personal desire for the show continuing will not on its own "will" it into happening. "Never count it out" doesn't exactly scream "definite renewal" and the fact that even the writers don't know whether it will be back supports that.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2008 10:45:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Is Smallville Season 9 Vaporware?</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/is_smallville_season_9_vaporware/#comment-21636418</link><description>@Blue Sunflower&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;One throwaway comment on a password protected section of a website, in an interview that was entirely about another TV series (90210) does not invalidate Bruce's statements.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;There have been NUMEROUS interviews and statements that have ALL pointed to this being the final season for months. We've documented many of them here on Screen Rant.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;So please get down off your high horse and cut Bruce some slack unless you can provide more "evidence" that this is in fact old news.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 23:02:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Is Smallville Season 9 Vaporware?</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/is_smallville_season_9_vaporware/#comment-21636415</link><description>Gotta admit the show is better SO FAR this season. The new guys in charge are doing a decent job.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 21:38:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Is Smallville Season 9 Vaporware?</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/is_smallville_season_9_vaporware/#comment-21636404</link><description>&lt;em&gt;"Go out with some great stories this season and shut it down once and for all."&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;What he said.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 00:23:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: David Goyer Shoots Down Batman 3 Rumors</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/david_goyer_shoots_down_batman_3_rumors/#comment-21636392</link><description>@Jennifer&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Another one-sentence comment and I'll consider it spamming for your site and you can kiss 'em buh-bye.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 09:54:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Get Smart 2 Possible, Needs Witty Title</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/get_smart_2_possible_needs_witty_title/#comment-21636381</link><description>@Scarecrow&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Good point - so with that in mind, toss out some ideas! :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 21:00:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: M. Night Shyamalan May Become Unbreakable Again</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/m_night_shyamalan_may_become_unbreakable_again/#comment-21636348</link><description>@huntthejest&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;"And the Happening? I didn’t see it, but somehow I think if I had, it would have made me want to kill myself too &lt;em&gt;(maybe that's the twist)&lt;/em&gt;."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;ROFLMAO!!! :-P&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 18:00:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: M. Night Shyamalan May Become Unbreakable Again</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/m_night_shyamalan_may_become_unbreakable_again/#comment-21636342</link><description>I might have liked "Lady in the Water" had it been directed by someone else. It came across as pretentious, yet cheesy.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Neat trick, that.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 17:25:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Captain America Movie Plot Revealed</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/captain_america_movie_plot_revealed/#comment-21636262</link><description>Ekhart might be a great choice, but he's a bit too old if they want to go by the comics.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Of course a 40yo Captain America might play better against a late 40s Tony Stark...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 13:47:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Weekend Movie News Wrap Up: October 5, 2008</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/weekend_movie_news_wrap_up_october_5_2008/#comment-21636242</link><description>Niall, did you miss that we posted on our own site that the running time is 2 hours 43 minutes? :-P&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://screenrant.com/amazing-watchmen-rob-3856/" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://screenrant.com/amazing-watchmen-rob-3856/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 05 Oct 2008 15:04:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Sci-Fi&amp;#8217;s Sanctuary Needs To Pick Up The Pace</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/sci_fi8217s_sanctuary_needs_to_pick_up_the_pace/#comment-21636237</link><description>Just tried watching this. Bored the crap out of me. Turned it off and deleted it from my DVR.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 22:22:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Harrison Ford Talks Indiana Jones 5</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/harrison_ford_talks_indiana_jones_5/#comment-21636207</link><description>@Ergo&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;There has been more than one TV show or movie that I've rewatched recently that did NOT live up to my memory of it from years ago. :-P&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;@Gary&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Yeah, I agree. I do believe Indy 2 was the FIRST movie to garner a PG-13 and that scene had something to do with it.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 05 Oct 2008 17:10:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Towelhead Review</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/towelhead_review/#comment-21634810</link><description>@Kurt&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;We'll have to agree to disagree on Iron Man. I think we judge movies differently. I review movies less on the technical artistic aspects and more on whether they accomplish their goal (entertaining, horrifying, though-provoking) within the context of their genre.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Just curious, what did you think of the first Spider-Man movie?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2008 11:09:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Towelhead Review</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/towelhead_review/#comment-21634806</link><description>@Kurt&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I take it you've never been a reader/fan of the Iron Man comic?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Regarding Iron Man and Iraq (actually, I believe it was Afghanistan)... That is the character's origin story: Injured by his own weapon in a war zone, captured by the opposing force and forced to build a weapon. Except in the original version it was Vietnam. In the comics it just served as the origin and he didn't go back there either.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And actually the Middle East WAS the focal point in the film, as he returned there to destroy Stark weapons and it was made clear that his self-described mission would be to go back and destroy any others.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Bridges wanted the suit so that he could sell it to the military - so, more money for the company.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;As far as RDJ, he really captured the Tony Stark character from the comics very well.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;In regards to The Happening, where youuse the word "crazy" I would substitute "idiotic" or flat out "retarded."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The Happening sucked, sucked, sucked.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;:-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2008 10:16:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Towelhead Review</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/towelhead_review/#comment-21634802</link><description>@Kurt&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Apparently the film was very well received at the 2007 Toronto Film Festival - and it made an impact on me.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Considering you gave Iron Man 2 out of 5 stars, The Happening 3/5 (better than Iron Man?!?!?!) called Die Hard 4 "an abomination." I'd say we have considerably different outlooks on movies. (Personally I would call The Happening an abomination.)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;At least we agree on Ghost Rider and The Dark Knight. :-P&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2008 00:10:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Towelhead Review</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/towelhead_review/#comment-21634799</link><description>It's most definitely not for everyone.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Far better than Hounddog, however.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 21 Sep 2008 00:53:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Towelhead Review</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/towelhead_review/#comment-21634796</link><description>@Patrick&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I updated it because the film has been released in theaters.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 20 Sep 2008 20:37:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Towelhead Review</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/towelhead_review/#comment-21634795</link><description>@Michael E Piston&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;em&gt;"if you don’t like child porn, you are not going to like this movie."&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;You're not supposed to LIKE this movie. It's supposed to make you uncomfortable. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And can you please share with us your background which makes you an authority on "super uptight Arab father(s)" and their sexual habits?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thanks,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 20 Sep 2008 20:36:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Towelhead Review</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/towelhead_review/#comment-21634794</link><description>@James2&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;100 years ago at the age of 14 people were a lot more mature than they are now. They grew up working on the family farm, helping families survive and had a lot more responsibilities. They didn't sit around watching Britney Spears and playing video games and having whatever they wanted handed to them by their parents.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 20 Sep 2008 20:31:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Towelhead Review</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/towelhead_review/#comment-21634789</link><description>It's a difficult movie to review at a PG level...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2008 16:45:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Towelhead Review</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/towelhead_review/#comment-21634787</link><description>Have you seen the film? If not, you're not in a position to comment on what happens in it. There's a big difference between Baywatch or a football game and a magazine specifically designed to stimulate sexual arousal.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I mean really... come on now.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2008 10:52:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Hounddog Review</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/hounddog_review/#comment-21634784</link><description>@Justin&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;$20 bucks says you're not a parent.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 30 Nov 2008 23:39:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Hounddog Review</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/hounddog_review/#comment-21634782</link><description>Watch the movie, then come back and comment on my review.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2008 14:30:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Hounddog Review</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/hounddog_review/#comment-21634774</link><description>Sorry, I've looked around and can't find any info on a possible release date for a DVD.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2007 14:58:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Hounddog Review</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/hounddog_review/#comment-21634772</link><description>I don't know for sure but I can't imagine any movie from the 2007 Sundance Film Festival not getting picked up for at LEAST a DVD release.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2007 10:24:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Hounddog Review</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/hounddog_review/#comment-21634770</link><description>Right... your KIDS have been wanting to watch it, because everything out there that talks about it makes it so appealing to them, right?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Come on, now.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2007 14:03:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Hounddog Review</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/hounddog_review/#comment-21634768</link><description>Nurse,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;First of all, you are AWESOME for doing the work you do. I hear what you're saying and I do give props to the director for trying to bring this into the spotlight. The problem I think lies in the fact that most people are not aware of the facts you presented above in regards to abused children's behavior and would most likely read it the way I did.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thanks so much for contributing your thoughts here.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 12 Feb 2007 09:14:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Green Hornet To Be A Laugh-Riot Comedy</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/green_hornet_to_be_a_laugh_riot_comedy/#comment-21634745</link><description>LOL, Bill you keep giving away my answers. :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Batman/GH crossover episodes are NOT a good example of the tone of the overall show.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2008 18:11:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Green Hornet To Be A Laugh-Riot Comedy</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/green_hornet_to_be_a_laugh_riot_comedy/#comment-21634741</link><description>@Feo&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;First, welcome to the site. :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And Bill makes a good point, there's changing something while being faithful to the spirit and then there's turning it on its head.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But yeah, my memories do influence my outlook on this - but why not? It's my memories they're targeting, otherwise they could call it something completely different.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2008 17:11:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Green Hornet To Be A Laugh-Riot Comedy</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/green_hornet_to_be_a_laugh_riot_comedy/#comment-21634728</link><description>@Mike&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;You may very well end up being right - but I'm looking at the people involved here and I *know* studios' penchant for twisting source material in some bizarre belief that they can bring a "new vision" to it.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 20 Sep 2008 01:21:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Shatner: No Cameo Offer In New Star Trek Movie</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/shatner_no_cameo_offer_in_new_star_trek_movie/#comment-21634714</link><description>I'd like to believe that this is a gigantic misinformation campaign, but I have it good authority that it's not - and that Shatner is in fact not going to be in the film.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Personally, I'm bummed and wish they had found a way to work him into the film in a big way.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Unfortunately we have the reality of his age and the shape he's in, and I don't think he would come across well on the big screen unless he had gone on a crash-fitness course that wouldn't give him a heart attack.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I'm sure salary was also an issue - they can't afford to inflate the budget on this film any more than it is already in case it ends up bombing.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2008 21:43:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Tintin In Trouble</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/tintin_in_trouble/#comment-21634712</link><description>Don't hesitate to email me if you have any more problems. :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2008 00:54:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Tintin In Trouble</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/tintin_in_trouble/#comment-21634710</link><description>Starfish, this is Vic, please let me know if you received this comment update.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2008 00:46:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Tintin In Trouble</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/tintin_in_trouble/#comment-21634706</link><description>As far as I'm concerned this just validates my opinion that there just isn't a huge audience for this.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2008 21:45:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Review: Smallville Season 8 Premiere</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/review_smallville_season_8_premiere/#comment-21634656</link><description>@Biggysmith&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;There is absolutely NO indication at this point that Michael Rosenbaum will be returning to the show this season. At all.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2008 17:56:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Review: Smallville Season 8 Premiere</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/review_smallville_season_8_premiere/#comment-21634642</link><description>@790&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Smallville is Smallville - it's own thing. You've had 7 years to adjust to that. :-P&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If anything, this season will move it closer to being more inline with the comic book version, but the two will never meet.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 20 Sep 2008 01:19:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Review: Smallville Season 8 Premiere</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/review_smallville_season_8_premiere/#comment-21634637</link><description>&lt;em&gt;"Does anyone think we will see any version of Batman and Wonder Woman on the show before the end?"&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Now there's an interesting thought. The same guys who said "no flights, no tights" ALSO said we'd never see Bruce Wayne on the show. But now... who knows? &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Wouldn't that be cool as hell? :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2008 18:58:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Review: Smallville Season 8 Premiere</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/review_smallville_season_8_premiere/#comment-21634632</link><description>@John&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Good point about the Chloe healing thing in regards to Clark. I still think her power has been replaced, though.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2008 13:22:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Review: Smallville Season 8 Premiere</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/review_smallville_season_8_premiere/#comment-21634629</link><description>@LauraT&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;There will be at least one episode this season where they explore the Clark/Chloe relationship - but with her having accepted Jimmy's proposal I can tell you in advance that it's going to bug the heck out of me to see that.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Clark ends up with Lois - anything else would just be a temporary situation.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2008 11:57:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Mid-Week Movie News Wrap Up &amp;#8211; Sept. 18, 2008</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/mid_week_movie_news_wrap_up_8211_sept_18_2008/#comment-21634614</link><description>The Ratner story has been debunked.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2008 21:45:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Mid-Week Movie News Wrap Up &amp;#8211; Sept. 18, 2008</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/mid_week_movie_news_wrap_up_8211_sept_18_2008/#comment-21634610</link><description>@Rattener&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I think you completely missed the sarcasm in that phrase. :-P&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 15:46:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Knight Rider Series Premiere Review</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/knight_rider_series_premiere_review/#comment-21634553</link><description>@Ninja31&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thanks, although you should see some of my reviews when I really tear into something, lol. :-P&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2008 22:51:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Knight Rider Series Premiere Review</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/knight_rider_series_premiere_review/#comment-21634544</link><description>&lt;em&gt;"I think part of the problem is that we aren’t in the 80’s anymore. We’ve seen what good shows in this genre can be and we’ve come to expect more."&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thank you - EXACTLY what I've been trying to say.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Also (and this is an important point), MANY of those 80s shows like Knight Rider, The A-Team, The Flash, etc. started out as SERIOUS shows (look at the first one or two episodes of each of those). But for some reason the pattern back in the 80s was for every one of those to fall into a "save the babe of the week whose scientist dad has been captured by bad guys and make it goofy."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2008 13:22:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Knight Rider Series Premiere Review</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/knight_rider_series_premiere_review/#comment-21634540</link><description>Also, in the "attack mode" I'd like to know what the purpose of the boy-racer neon lights under the car were. :-P&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 17:41:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Knight Rider Series Premiere Review</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/knight_rider_series_premiere_review/#comment-21634537</link><description>&lt;em&gt;"Then again you can have a great show with great writing that gets cancelled quickly like Firefly, and Brimstone, and tripe that stays on tv for years like Big Brother and Survivor."&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;On THAT point we agree. :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Sometimes there's no justice in the world of televsion.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 16:41:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Knight Rider Series Premiere Review</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/knight_rider_series_premiere_review/#comment-21634535</link><description>@Merrill&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;You can have a great show in ANY genre.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;We'll see how long "good, cheesy fun" lasts.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 15:26:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Knight Rider Series Premiere Review</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/knight_rider_series_premiere_review/#comment-21634531</link><description>@Merrill&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The review is biased? Dude, you're LUCKY it's biased - if it was a completely objective review rating this show on an even playing field with others like Fringe, Lost, House, etc. I would have reamed it.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Part of the reason I &lt;em&gt;didn't&lt;/em&gt; rip this a new one is because I &lt;em&gt;am&lt;/em&gt; aware of the source material, bud. I even mentioned that in my review of the 2 hour movie 7 months ago.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;As to the Turbo Boost, right at the start of the episode K.I.T.T. went airborne FROM A STANDSTILL when surrounded by the bad guys. That's how it escaped - by "leaping" over them.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 13:30:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Knight Rider Series Premiere Review</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/knight_rider_series_premiere_review/#comment-21634528</link><description>LOL, yeah... civility online is so rare it seems weird when you see it. :-P&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 12:44:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Knight Rider Series Premiere Review</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/knight_rider_series_premiere_review/#comment-21634526</link><description>@Psyko&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;No offense taken whatsoever, bud. :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And thanks for the props... welcome to the site!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 12:24:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Knight Rider Series Premiere Review</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/knight_rider_series_premiere_review/#comment-21634524</link><description>@Psyko&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Yeah, don't ask me why, but for some reason I'm more "gentle" with some shows than I am with others. I think it's because my expectations are far lower for shows like Knight Rider. I &lt;em&gt;expect&lt;/em&gt; them to be "cheesy" so I feel like I can't complain too much when they turn out that way. :-P&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But yeah, I agree with everything you said.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 11:20:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Watch A 5 Minute Sneak Preview Of Heroes!</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/watch_a_5_minute_sneak_preview_of_heroes/#comment-21634516</link><description>@790&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;As far as I know the premiere is one hour and that's what I saw.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I think they're going to show two back to back episodes.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2008 19:02:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Watch The Knight Rider 2008 Season Premiere Online</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/watch_the_knight_rider_2008_season_premiere_online/#comment-21634512</link><description>@Humphrey ABD&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Yeah, TV series are different from movies in that a movie has one shot at being good or not - an ongoing series sometimes takes a few episodes to find its “legs.”&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2008 13:40:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Watch The Knight Rider 2008 Season Premiere Online</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/watch_the_knight_rider_2008_season_premiere_online/#comment-21634510</link><description>@Humphrey ABD&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Hey, more power to ya, bro. :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I'll tell you what though - I have tried to revisit some old TV shows I loved from the 80s and watching them NOW I can't even sit through them. I tried renting "The Greatest American Hero" which I used to really enjoy, but wasn't able to get through more than 1 1/2 episodes of it.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Some TV shows are best left in the past, where our fond memories color them as being better than they actually were.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2008 10:21:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Watch The Knight Rider 2008 Season Premiere Online</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/watch_the_knight_rider_2008_season_premiere_online/#comment-21634499</link><description>My review of the series premiere is up:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://screenrant.com/knight-rider-2008-season-premiere-review-vic-3722/" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://screenrant.com/knight-rider-2008-season-...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2008 23:32:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Watch The Knight Rider 2008 Season Premiere Online</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/watch_the_knight_rider_2008_season_premiere_online/#comment-21634491</link><description>I'm watching the episode now. About 20 minutes in - it's still dumb.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2008 21:45:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Watch The Knight Rider 2008 Season Premiere Online</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/watch_the_knight_rider_2008_season_premiere_online/#comment-21634480</link><description>@Ash Ali&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Are you not in the U.S.? They may be blocking it for non-U.S. residents (which sucks, IMHO).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2008 14:11:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Discussion &amp;#8211; September 17, 2008</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/open_discussion_8211_september_17_2008/#comment-21634464</link><description>@790&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I may actually keep a copy of Speed Racer for myself and give it another try. :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 11:18:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Discussion &amp;#8211; September 17, 2008</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/open_discussion_8211_september_17_2008/#comment-21634460</link><description>The only way I'd vote for another Alien movie would be if Sigourney Weaver returned with either Ridley Scott (possible) or James Cameron (NEVER gonna happen).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2008 23:56:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Discussion &amp;#8211; September 17, 2008</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/open_discussion_8211_september_17_2008/#comment-21634451</link><description>BTW, coming soon: a MONSTER DVD GIVEAWAY where regular Screen Rant visitors will actually have the advantage. :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2008 16:01:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Discussion &amp;#8211; September 17, 2008</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/open_discussion_8211_september_17_2008/#comment-21634450</link><description>@Bruce Montreal&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;ROFLMAO!!! :-D</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2008 14:32:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Depp And Hoffman (NOT) Confirmed For Batman 3</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/depp_and_hoffman_not_confirmed_for_batman_3/#comment-21633648</link><description>@the old man&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;LOL, sometimes the internet can be a perpetual motion machine. Someone says something on a blog, it gets picked up by the media, and then is distributed by other blogs as "confirmed." :-P&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I *did* add "unofficial" to the post title...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 18:01:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Will Smith As Captain America = Pure Rumor</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/will_smith_as_captain_america_pure_rumor/#comment-21633630</link><description>@SIN187UM&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Must you be so abrasive in your replies? I had my mouse hovering over the delete button on your comment but let it slide.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 14:46:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Will Smith As Captain America = Pure Rumor</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/will_smith_as_captain_america_pure_rumor/#comment-21633621</link><description>All right, that's enough you two.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2008 18:19:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Will Smith As Captain America = Pure Rumor</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/will_smith_as_captain_america_pure_rumor/#comment-21633593</link><description>@greenknight&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Captain America can still work as a movie in "this day and age." Aren't WWII movies still being cranked out with stories of heroism every year (crap like "Redacted" notwithstanding)?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 21:18:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Bangkok Dangerous Review</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/bangkok_dangerous_review/#comment-21633566</link><description>@Daniel&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Ok, fine, there are instances when it works, but overall I don't like voiceovers used.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2008 21:07:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Bangkok Dangerous Review</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/bangkok_dangerous_review/#comment-21633562</link><description>I stand utterly corrected on the deaf girl dancing on stage thing.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 23:53:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Bangkok Dangerous Review</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/bangkok_dangerous_review/#comment-21633559</link><description>@the old man&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Like I said, overly dramatic. Didn't like the film or his performance.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;We'll be discussing it tonight on /FilmCast Live at 7PM PST: &lt;a href="http://slashfilm.com/live/" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://slashfilm.com/live/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 16:48:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Bangkok Dangerous Review</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/bangkok_dangerous_review/#comment-21633552</link><description>@soyouknow&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thanks. Just seemed silly to me.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 10:24:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Creator Doesn&amp;#8217;t Think Venom Can Carry A Movie</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/creator_doesn8217t_think_venom_can_carry_a_movie/#comment-21633511</link><description>@Patrick&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;LMAO! Yeah, I struggled with the title. The alternatives were all too long, so I ended up with this one. :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 06 Sep 2008 12:11:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Raimi and Maguire To Return For Spider-Man 4 (and 5)</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/raimi_and_maguire_to_return_for_spider_man_4_and_5/#comment-21633497</link><description>Wow, I thought I was cynical.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2008 21:43:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Raimi and Maguire To Return For Spider-Man 4 (and 5)</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/raimi_and_maguire_to_return_for_spider_man_4_and_5/#comment-21633494</link><description>@Neofcon&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I take it you've never been to a high school science fair. :-P&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2008 15:29:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Raimi and Maguire To Return For Spider-Man 4 (and 5)</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/raimi_and_maguire_to_return_for_spider_man_4_and_5/#comment-21633440</link><description>@RD&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I hear what you're saying, but Spider-Man 3 rode a LONG way on hype and anticipation. If a lot of people were disappointed by it, that could very well impact the box office take of the next film.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I think that's one reason The Incredible Hulk didn't do better this summer - because people didn't like the previous one, so it affected the attendence of this film, regardless of the fact that it was better.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 23:47:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: My Own Worst Enemy: The Return Of Christian Slater?</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/my_own_worst_enemy_the_return_of_christian_slater/#comment-21637014</link><description>@Gary&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Haven't seen the show but from the description it sounded like the dual-life spy idea from True Lies.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 22:21:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Weekend Movie News Wrap Up: October 12, 2008</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/weekend_movie_news_wrap_up_october_12_2008/#comment-21637001</link><description>The disguise theory is certainly plausible considering these images were not released by the studio but are spy shots.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 09:42:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Body of Lies Review</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/body_of_lies_review/#comment-21636992</link><description>@Steven&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I realize that. My point is that the last two films he's appeared in conveniently involved him having facial hair. :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2008 12:45:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Body of Lies Review</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/body_of_lies_review/#comment-21636987</link><description>Regardless of what you say, people are going to interpret it as I've described, and when setting out to make a movie like this everyone involved should realize that.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 18 Oct 2008 14:06:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Body of Lies Review</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/body_of_lies_review/#comment-21636983</link><description>Daniel,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I disagree.Of course the writer of the book upon which the screenplay is based had the intent of this reflecting upon his interpretation of the way things work. And it follows that the film does the same.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I really don't see how it could be interpreted otherwise.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2008 21:40:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Body of Lies Review</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/body_of_lies_review/#comment-21636980</link><description>Yeah, I did mention that above, but maybe I'm more sensitive to it. It was more of a "get results now, damn the consequences" sort of thing, but yeah, it was there.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;You should rent it when it comes out.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2008 23:33:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why I Loved Iron Man More Than The Dark Knight</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/why_i_loved_iron_man_more_than_the_dark_knight/#comment-21635411</link><description>You are correct that people are by nature self-serving, I'll grant you that. The goal is to go beyond that and my point is that people I know that help others don't think "Hey, I'm feeling a little depressed today, I think I'll go help someone so it makes me feel better." Which SEEMS to me to be your argument. If I'm misinterpreting you, I apologize.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I wasn't arguing that pride and satisfaction are "bad," I stated that those should not be the reason for doing things, but by-products of the deed.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I speak for Christians because I know and associate with Christians and I know what our beliefs as a group, are.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I refer you to Star Trek: The Voyage Home and their conversation regarding a common frame of reference:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;BONES&lt;br&gt;Spock, it's me, Bones! I mean our&lt;br&gt;experience was unique. You really&lt;br&gt;have gone where no man has gone &lt;br&gt;before. Can't you tell me what it&lt;br&gt;felt like?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;SPOCK&lt;br&gt;It would be impossible to discuss&lt;br&gt;the subject without a common frame&lt;br&gt;of reference.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;BONES&lt;br&gt;You mean I have to die to discuss&lt;br&gt;your insights on death?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I think about the above exchange ALL the time when discussing parenting with people who don't have kids of their own. :-P&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 11:59:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why I Loved Iron Man More Than The Dark Knight</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/why_i_loved_iron_man_more_than_the_dark_knight/#comment-21635407</link><description>@Robert&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Sorry, bro. I don't know what life experiences you've had, how young you are or what kind of people you hang out with but you are just plain wrong.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Of course people "feel good" after doing something kind for someone - why shouldn't they? But that's not the REASON to do something good (which is what your are saying). The reason to do it is because it's the right thing.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;You seem to be saying that anyone who donates their time to volunteer to help others is doing it for ulterior motives: self-satisfaction and pride. People who check out of their own lives to go down to hurricane-ravaged areas to help, those who volunteer to help widows or single mothers in their neighborhood, or when my wife cooks a week's worth of meals for a friend who has cancer because she can't take care of herself. These people are all doing this so they can "feel good?"&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Please.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Speak for yourself if you would actually go that far to make yourself feel good, but you have no right to speak for those who are actually out there helping others.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Unfortunately secularism is making everything "relative" and that's one of the reasons Christians fight back so hard. Perhaps from a non-God-believer point of view what you're saying makes sense (not making a general statement, just saying Christians do NOT look at it your way).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And you are OBVIOUSLY not a parent because your analogy is, to use your word, retarded. If you think doing something that brings joy to your child is a self-serving act I hope you never have kids.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Then again, if you DO have a child eventually, you'll learn how backwards your above statement is.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Heck, this is a movie site - you want a movie example? "It's a Wonderful Life" with Jimmy Stewart. He sacrificed for years so it would make him feel good, right? Or the donations that came in to help him at the end of the movie? All just so those donating could feel better about themselves.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I'm sorry you're such a cynic. Maybe you need to change your circle of friends which are obviously supporting and feeding that view of the world.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Respectfully,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 11:20:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why I Loved Iron Man More Than The Dark Knight</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/why_i_loved_iron_man_more_than_the_dark_knight/#comment-21635404</link><description>@Amol @Ken J Ok, folks, let's knock this down a notch and stop antagonizing each other.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;@Robert&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;em&gt;"Well, in a Christian country like America, altuism is pretty scarce."&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I'm trying to decipher that comment... are you implying that BECAUSE America is a "Christian country" altruism is scarce? So non-Christians are more altruistic than Christians?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;em&gt;"True altuism, which is only benefitting your sense of pride as opposed to your pockets, sex life, what have you."&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;You, my friend do NOT understand what "true altruism" is. Altruism has NOTHING to do with pride.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 10:22:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why I Loved Iron Man More Than The Dark Knight</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/why_i_loved_iron_man_more_than_the_dark_knight/#comment-21635391</link><description>@Amos&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;You need to relax. I don't think there's a single TDK "hater" here. And the post above is an OPINION piece. Jeez, look at the title.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 13:36:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why I Loved Iron Man More Than The Dark Knight</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/why_i_loved_iron_man_more_than_the_dark_knight/#comment-21635362</link><description>Hey Daniel,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;What didn't you like about the batsuit? I thought it was the most realistic to date.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And yeah, the points you mentioned are some of the things that kept the movie from being a 5/5 for me (although I liked the Batpod).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 28 Sep 2008 11:42:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why I Loved Iron Man More Than The Dark Knight</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/why_i_loved_iron_man_more_than_the_dark_knight/#comment-21635339</link><description>@Daniel&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;LOL, can't argue with you there... :-P&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 27 Sep 2008 18:16:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why I Loved Iron Man More Than The Dark Knight</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/why_i_loved_iron_man_more_than_the_dark_knight/#comment-21635336</link><description>Amol,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I edited the profanity and a condescending comment towards someone else out of your post (hard to do since the entire thing is so damned condescending).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;In any case in regards to your reply to ME: of course a film needs a strong antagonist, but classic story mythology is about the journey of the HERO, not the VILLAIN.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;P.S. I'm thinking of implementing a personal rule that if I find personal insults or foul language in a comment, no matter how long the thing is, I'm just going to delete it instead of taking my valuable time to clean it up.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 27 Sep 2008 14:18:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why I Loved Iron Man More Than The Dark Knight</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/why_i_loved_iron_man_more_than_the_dark_knight/#comment-21635334</link><description>@Daniel&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;em&gt;"Intead[sic] of just being a man and flat out saying what he thought"&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;That's the kind of crap I'm talking about. How about if I replied "if Daniel would stop being such a damned whiner."?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But there's no NEED for that and it just drags down the tone of the comment thread.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 27 Sep 2008 12:48:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why I Loved Iron Man More Than The Dark Knight</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/why_i_loved_iron_man_more_than_the_dark_knight/#comment-21635330</link><description>@Reverend&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Oh, I knew this would generate sparks, and people have been very civil here for the most part. :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;@Daniel&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Do you think maybe it was because he was anticipating blowback from people?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Just a thought.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2008 20:20:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why I Loved Iron Man More Than The Dark Knight</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/why_i_loved_iron_man_more_than_the_dark_knight/#comment-21635325</link><description>@Daniel Fenwick&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;em&gt;"This is the internet don’t expect to express your opinion and have everyone agree with you and praise you for being brilliant."&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Of course not, but unlike most other sites on the internet, here I enforce that even you disagree, you need to be civil about it. The problem with "the internet" is anonymity: People will say the most outrageous things to others online that they would NEVER have the balls to say to that person's face were they in the same room. It breeds a false machismo which frankly, I find disgusting and pathetic.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;em&gt;"I think it says a lot about this guy that he overly tried to praise TDK just because he was afraid of a little internet backlash."&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Yeah, it says he REALLY LIKED The Dark Knight. A lot.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Chill out.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2008 17:15:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why I Loved Iron Man More Than The Dark Knight</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/why_i_loved_iron_man_more_than_the_dark_knight/#comment-21635323</link><description>@Ken J&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;"I guess I could have simply explained this point of view without it turning into direct insults."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Yup, that was my only issue with your comment. I refer you to this:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;em&gt;Rules: No profanity or personal attacks.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;:-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2008 16:10:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why I Loved Iron Man More Than The Dark Knight</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/why_i_loved_iron_man_more_than_the_dark_knight/#comment-21635316</link><description>@Ken J&lt;br&gt;&lt;em&gt;"I find this utterly hilarious that there are so many people attacking this guy for expressing an opinion… Sad how simple some peoples’ minds can be..."&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Ken, you do have a knack for being inflammatory.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Although I realize you're trying to defend Heath, that last bit was completely unnecessary.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2008 11:01:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why I Loved Iron Man More Than The Dark Knight</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/why_i_loved_iron_man_more_than_the_dark_knight/#comment-21635301</link><description>@Daniel Fenwick&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;All valid points, but notice that the comparisons are focusing on RDJ vs Heath Ledger. One big weakness of TDK is that it was about the Joker and Harvey Dent much more than it was about the guy who is supposed to be the hero: Batman himself.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2008 17:17:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why I Loved Iron Man More Than The Dark Knight</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/why_i_loved_iron_man_more_than_the_dark_knight/#comment-21635293</link><description>@John "Kahless" Taylor&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The last comment I see from you on the site is from Sept 17, and I haven't come across any in the spam filter.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2008 14:11:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why I Loved Iron Man More Than The Dark Knight</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/why_i_loved_iron_man_more_than_the_dark_knight/#comment-21635286</link><description>Well... I am a LONG time Iron Man fan (heck, I run &lt;a href="http://www.advancediron.org" rel="nofollow"&gt;the biggest Iron Man fansite in the world&lt;/a&gt;) but while I can say that TDK was a &lt;em&gt;better&lt;/em&gt; film, I &lt;em&gt;enjoyed&lt;/em&gt; Iron Man more.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2008 11:04:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why I Loved Iron Man More Than The Dark Knight</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/why_i_loved_iron_man_more_than_the_dark_knight/#comment-21635284</link><description>@Reverend&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Just trying to keep some clarity on the theme of the article. :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2008 10:32:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why I Loved Iron Man More Than The Dark Knight</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/why_i_loved_iron_man_more_than_the_dark_knight/#comment-21635282</link><description>For all you incredulous folks saying "of COURSE Dark Knight was better than Iron Man," I encourage you to look at the title of this post which states:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;"Why &lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;**I**&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/em&gt; Loved Iron Man More Than The Dark Knight"&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;:-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2008 10:16:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Discussion &amp;#8211; September 24, 2008</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/open_discussion_8211_september_24_2008/#comment-21635263</link><description>Sadly, yes. Just getting ready to write something up.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 27 Sep 2008 13:35:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Discussion &amp;#8211; September 24, 2008</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/open_discussion_8211_september_24_2008/#comment-21635243</link><description>@jbrrex&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;No apology required, this post is for discussing whatever you like within the TV/movie category. :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Haven't heard a peep about any other Eragon movies, BTW.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2008 01:06:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Discussion &amp;#8211; September 24, 2008</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/open_discussion_8211_september_24_2008/#comment-21635230</link><description>@Scarecrow&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Welcome to the site! You'll find we have a pretty friendly environment here, thanks to the iron fist of the site owner (uh, that would be me). :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Do me a favor and please use a valid email address when subscribing to comments though, the one you're using seems to be invalid since I'm getting bounce messages from it.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And regarding "Death Proof"... I'll quote myself from my review:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;em&gt;"Death Proof was a crushing disappointment and absolute torture to sit through."&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;:-P&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2008 20:51:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Discussion &amp;#8211; September 24, 2008</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/open_discussion_8211_september_24_2008/#comment-21635218</link><description>&lt;em&gt;"Gee I hope the Brits don’t perceive &lt;br&gt;American TV as pro-faith."&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Ha. Ha Ha. HAHAHAHA!!!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I'm sorry, I don't see how ANYONE could perceive American TV as a whole as being pro-faith. :-P&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2008 19:59:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Discussion &amp;#8211; September 24, 2008</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/open_discussion_8211_september_24_2008/#comment-21635214</link><description>@David Dale&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;As a matter of fact, I have been told that before.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And here I thought I looked like Brad Pitt... :-P&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2008 16:03:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Discussion &amp;#8211; September 24, 2008</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/open_discussion_8211_september_24_2008/#comment-21635206</link><description>I don't think TOS was anti-God. However I do believe that TNG had a definite atheistic point of view.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Not to mention Socialist.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2008 14:00:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Discussion &amp;#8211; September 24, 2008</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/open_discussion_8211_september_24_2008/#comment-21635202</link><description>@790&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Ah, ok... now I get it. :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2008 12:34:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Discussion &amp;#8211; September 24, 2008</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/open_discussion_8211_september_24_2008/#comment-21635200</link><description>@Atomic Popcorn&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I'll have a review of Eagle Eye up on Friday. I'm really torn... while it was overall satisfying as an action flick, but it was also pretty ridiculous.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2008 10:59:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Discussion &amp;#8211; September 24, 2008</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/open_discussion_8211_september_24_2008/#comment-21635199</link><description>@790&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I totally don't get the "Ginko Bibloba" reference.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2008 10:51:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Watchmen Lawsuit Update</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/watchmen_lawsuit_update/#comment-21635174</link><description>@Oscar&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Hey bro, I checked the spam folder for your comment but I didn't see it there - and I certainly didn't delete it.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2008 10:50:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: First Look At Megatron From Transformers 2?</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/first_look_at_megatron_from_transformers_2/#comment-21635159</link><description>Rob,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I don't recall. It's late and I've had 3 glasses of wine, but I did read that the images came from Hasbro and they confirmed they are from the film.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2008 23:55:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: First Look At Megatron From Transformers 2?</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/first_look_at_megatron_from_transformers_2/#comment-21635155</link><description>Ack!!! Wrong post!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I wanted to comment HERE that it's been confirmed that image is Megatron.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2008 13:30:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Might Schwarzenegger Return For Predator 3?</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/might_schwarzenegger_return_for_predator_3/#comment-21635115</link><description>@Patrick&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;LOL, how old are you bro? Sure, Ahnuld knows what to do and his body responds to bodybuilding but the man is 61 years old. The body does NOT respond as quickly or with as much vigor to weight training at that age as compared to 31.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;He mentioned how brutal it was to get in shape for T3.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Believe me, it is a LOT harder for me to stay in shape now than it used to be, and I'm a ways away from his age. :-P&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2008 17:09:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Iron Man DVD Contest Winners!</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/iron_man_dvd_contest_winners/#comment-21635103</link><description>LOL, newcomers, did you guys even bother to read the post above? The contest is OVER and winners have been selected.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;That's what happens when you just click through from a sweeptstakes site and have no interest in the site hosting the contest.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 28 Sep 2008 18:28:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Iron Man DVD Contest Winners!</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/iron_man_dvd_contest_winners/#comment-21635096</link><description>LOL, very funny guys.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The next contest will actually give the advantage to faithful Screen Rant readers. :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Soon...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2008 14:13:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Iron Man DVD Contest Winners!</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/iron_man_dvd_contest_winners/#comment-21635092</link><description>Winners announced above. Thanks for entering!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2008 10:23:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Iron Man DVD Contest Winners!</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/iron_man_dvd_contest_winners/#comment-21635090</link><description>The contest has been closed - I will be selecting the winners this weekend.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thanks for entering and good luck!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 21 Sep 2008 00:59:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Iron Man DVD Contest Winners!</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/iron_man_dvd_contest_winners/#comment-21635088</link><description>@Gary&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It's coming out on DVD. I received an advance copy yesterday, so I know what I'll be watching tonight. :-P&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2008 11:56:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Iron Man DVD Contest Winners!</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/iron_man_dvd_contest_winners/#comment-21635085</link><description>Hey guys, FYI, I will be receiving the DVDs on the 26th and I'll try to get them out in the mail on the next day.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2008 21:20:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Iron Man DVD Contest Winners!</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/iron_man_dvd_contest_winners/#comment-21635082</link><description>Kel,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Depends on when exactly I end the contest, when I receive the DVDs and when I receive the mailing addresses after notifying the winners.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2008 10:12:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Iron Man DVD Contest Winners!</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/iron_man_dvd_contest_winners/#comment-21635078</link><description>Ken, received your entry.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 10:23:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Iron Man DVD Contest Winners!</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/iron_man_dvd_contest_winners/#comment-21635074</link><description>@Ken J&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;You receive a verification email when you sign up for the daily Screen Rant newsletter, not for entering the contest. I believe that if you add an email address to your address book, it automatically lets it through, but I'm not 100% sure about that.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I see you as an active member of the newsletter but I couldn't find an entry email for the contest (assuming your using the same email addy you do for comments here).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 23:44:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Iron Man DVD Contest Winners!</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/iron_man_dvd_contest_winners/#comment-21635065</link><description>@Zipper&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Nope. Once you're signed up, you're signed up. :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 20:38:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Iron Man DVD Contest Winners!</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/iron_man_dvd_contest_winners/#comment-21635062</link><description>@Surma&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;What do you mean? I checked the spam folder and didn't see any comments from you there.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 17:23:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Iron Man DVD Contest Winners!</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/iron_man_dvd_contest_winners/#comment-21635057</link><description>Andy,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Yeah, bud. Sorry for the delay. I have 8 DVDs from two contests I need to send out...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I've got to carve out some time this weekend to get them all addressed and packed up and to the post office.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 02:28:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Review: Heroes Season 3 Premiere</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/review_heroes_season_3_premiere/#comment-21635046</link><description>@thriller&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;em&gt;"You would thing that he would grow some pair after leaving feudal Japan"&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;EXACTLY. I don't recall the amount of time he was there, but it was quite a while, and the showed that he grew as a person and in maturity. Apparently that's all gone and he's back to "goofy Hiro."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;At least they DID explain why sometimes the "going back in time one minute" might not work.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2008 18:23:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Review: Heroes Season 3 Premiere</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/review_heroes_season_3_premiere/#comment-21635004</link><description>BTW, I like where they're taking the Sylar character (teaming him up with HRG... woah). But honestly I'm getting sick of how idiotic Hiro is acting on the show.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;After what he's been through he should have matured some.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 10:28:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Review: Heroes Season 3 Premiere</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/review_heroes_season_3_premiere/#comment-21635003</link><description>I've had it with "STYLE." I've deleted his last 3 comments and if he comes back and is insulting I'll just delete them again.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If he wants a platform he can start his own website.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 10:25:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Review: Heroes Season 3 Premiere</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/review_heroes_season_3_premiere/#comment-21634975</link><description>The problem with "time jumping" is that it makes it difficult to explain why some bad event is not simply "undone" by jumping back in time 5 minutes. (Think Hiro and the formula being stolen.)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;At least they're addressing how terribly the timeline is getting hosed through their meddling.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2008 17:40:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Raimi and Maguire To Return For Spider-Man 4 (and 5)</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/raimi_and_maguire_to_return_for_spider_man_4_and_5/#comment-21633416</link><description>@greenknight&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Regarding Venom, very true. He was shoehorned into the story and it showed.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 06 Sep 2008 12:12:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Raimi and Maguire To Return For Spider-Man 4 (and 5)</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/raimi_and_maguire_to_return_for_spider_man_4_and_5/#comment-21633408</link><description>@greenknight&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;MST3K = Mystery Science Theater 3000&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It was a program that made fun of really bad B-movies with a guy and two "robots" sitting in a movie theater cracking jokes while the movie played.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.mst3k.com/" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.mst3k.com/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 23:41:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Raimi and Maguire To Return For Spider-Man 4 (and 5)</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/raimi_and_maguire_to_return_for_spider_man_4_and_5/#comment-21633399</link><description>Will it sounds like at least for #4 it may be Doc Connors/The Lizard. But if they're filming 4/5 combined, that means we'll be looking at multiple villains for sure.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 20:56:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Batman 3 Villain Update</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/batman_3_villain_update/#comment-21633363</link><description>"PS Heath Ledger didn’t make the Joker incredible, Christopher and Jonathon Nolans’ script made the Joker incredible and Heath was lucky enough to play the role."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Can't say I agree with you 100% on that. Put a lesser actor in a role and it doesn't matter how good the script is.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2009 10:50:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Batman 3 Villain Update</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/batman_3_villain_update/#comment-21633341</link><description>LMAO! That's one of the funniest series of interview questions I've ever read. Kind of reminds me of a desperate boyfriend trying to not get dumped by his girlfriend...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;So you're not really breaking up with me are you?&lt;br&gt;- Yes, I am. I've had it with you, we're through, the end, finito.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Does that mean I can't sleep with you again?&lt;br&gt;- What part of "I'm breaking up with you don't you understand?"&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I was really hoping you would still sleep with me.&lt;br&gt;- Listen, I'm breaking up with you... you do get that means no more sex, right?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Well in the movies, sometimes the girl comes back - maybe we'll get back together.&lt;br&gt;- I think that the fact I'm already engaged to someone else makes that a problem.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;So you really don't plan on getting back together with me?&lt;br&gt;- No, I don't. I've been seeing another guy behind your back for 6 weeks.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;:-P</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 15:43:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Nicolas Cage Talks Ghost Rider 2 and Kick-Ass</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/nicolas_cage_talks_ghost_rider_2_and_kick_ass/#comment-21633327</link><description>LOL, if it's good, it'll get a good review. :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 20:52:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Nicolas Cage Talks Ghost Rider 2 and Kick-Ass</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/nicolas_cage_talks_ghost_rider_2_and_kick_ass/#comment-21633324</link><description>@High Kalibur&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Besides 790, I think you'll find most people think it doesn't warrant a sequel. :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 17:24:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: War Machine to Appear in Iron Man 2, 3 AND a Spin-Off?</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/war_machine_to_appear_in_iron_man_2_3_and_a_spin_off/#comment-21633311</link><description>Jae,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Yup, that was my problem with Terrence in the role.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;BTW folks, I've added the audio interview to the post above.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 10:34:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: War Machine to Appear in Iron Man 2, 3 AND a Spin-Off?</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/war_machine_to_appear_in_iron_man_2_3_and_a_spin_off/#comment-21633305</link><description>@Jae Senn&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;That's not going to happen (although I agree). I always pictured Rhodey as more of a Wesley Snipes kind of guy.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 13:31:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Discussion &amp;#8211; September 3, 2008</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/open_discussion_8211_september_3_2008/#comment-21633242</link><description>I think I found the culprit on the auto-expanding ad (something related to gasoline or something) and I've disabled it.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 14:53:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Discussion &amp;#8211; September 3, 2008</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/open_discussion_8211_september_3_2008/#comment-21633240</link><description>Steven,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Yeah, I say use practical effects wherever possible. Always looks better and is more effective.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 13:30:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Discussion &amp;#8211; September 3, 2008</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/open_discussion_8211_september_3_2008/#comment-21633233</link><description>@High Kalibur&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Dude, what-ever. I don't recall reading across the web your Spidey-show being acclaimed as being an amazing animated series as is so often the case with the DC animated shows.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Successful does not necessarily equal good.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Look at the MTV show "Jackass": Two full seasons and two theatrical movies. So because that was more "successful" than "Jericho" or "Journeyman" by your logic it's a better show. How many "Friday the 13th," "Hellraiser," and "Scary Movies" have their been?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Successful? Maybe? Great? That would be: no.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;We all have our favorites, no need to get bent out of shape. Hell, how often do you hear me give 790 a hard time over thinking "Speed Racer" was an awesome movie? :-P&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I'm done, BTW. If you want the last word, have a party.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Nice to have someone here who's passionate about their faves and knows how to defend 'em. :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 02:26:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Discussion &amp;#8211; September 3, 2008</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/open_discussion_8211_september_3_2008/#comment-21633223</link><description>Hey 790, you'll be happy to hear that I just read that a Ghost Rider sequel is in the works. :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 00:25:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Discussion &amp;#8211; September 3, 2008</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/open_discussion_8211_september_3_2008/#comment-21633222</link><description>@High Kalibur&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I hate to break it to you, but we can say whatever we like here at Screen Rant. You are however free to disagree (as you have done). I encourage debate on the site as long as it's intelligent and civil.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And, yes, I *am* old, but Kofi, who wrote the post is not. :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Oh, and my favorite Spider-Man animated series is the one from the 1960s.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 00:24:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Discussion &amp;#8211; September 3, 2008</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/open_discussion_8211_september_3_2008/#comment-21633218</link><description>@High Kalibur&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I didn't write this post, but if we're talking about the same Spider-Man cartoon, then I thought it was lousy. You might be talking about a different one though.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Haven't seen the director's cut of DD because I haven't been able to rent it and I don't want to buy the DVD.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;P.S. I have to say this open discussion is going pretty well. :-P</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 23:48:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Discussion &amp;#8211; September 3, 2008</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/open_discussion_8211_september_3_2008/#comment-21633203</link><description>@High Kaliber&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;em&gt;"Yeah, I am a fan, so I take offense when people that are suppose to be ‘writing professionally’ allow their own opinions to confuse factual statements."&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Ah. Now I see the problem. This is not an objective movie news site. This is an editorial site where we express our opinions on the news of the day, so no, what we post is not objective, it is subjective.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And of course, we're always right. :-p&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 19:16:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Discussion &amp;#8211; September 3, 2008</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/open_discussion_8211_september_3_2008/#comment-21633198</link><description>That's nice. That would really make for a fleshed out section on the site: One post saying "Todd McFarlane is working on a screenplay."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The last time there was ANY news on it was over a year ago where he said he'd begun working on the screenplay. There's nothing to cover.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I'm sorry if people aren't that interested in talking about your topics, I have no control over that. Sometimes the discussion takes off, and other times it doesn't.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Plenty of forums out there for this sort of thing... I just thought it would be nice to give folks an open forum once a week, which you won't find on other movie blogs.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 18:53:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Discussion &amp;#8211; September 3, 2008</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/open_discussion_8211_september_3_2008/#comment-21633194</link><description>@High Kaliber&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;em&gt;"Well this 'Open discussion sucks'..."&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Um, what is your problem? Seriously.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;em&gt;"How come there is not a page for Spawn?"&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;BECAUSE NO ONE IS WORKING ON A SPAWN MOVIE.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;em&gt;"and why did you guys remove that ill-informed article about Marvel Manga crossovers?"&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;A. If it was "ill-informed" why would you care if it was removed?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;B. Oh yeah, it WASN'T removed. I don't know why you're not capable of finding it.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Yeesh.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 18:42:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Discussion &amp;#8211; September 3, 2008</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/open_discussion_8211_september_3_2008/#comment-21633187</link><description>@Dave&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;EVERY time? At most those ads (and they shouldn't be auto-expanding) should be coming up only 25% of the time. I'm not seeing the problem in either Firefox or Internet Explorer.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Can you guys email me at vic at &lt;a href="http://screenrant.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;screenrant.com&lt;/a&gt; and let me know:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Is it the top banner ad?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Is it the square ad on the side of the page?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;What are the ads advertising?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Believe me, I do NOT want to annoy my visitors, so any info would be helpful in resolving this issue.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thanks,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 17:52:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Discussion &amp;#8211; September 3, 2008</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/open_discussion_8211_september_3_2008/#comment-21633172</link><description>Shane,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;What drop down ads? I had those for a while but removed them due to complaints. As far as I known there shouldn't be any more of those expanding ads running on the site.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 14:15:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Discussion &amp;#8211; September 3, 2008</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/open_discussion_8211_september_3_2008/#comment-21633170</link><description>We don't know for sure that the next Superman movie will be "dark." There's no script or even a story idea as far as I'm aware.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Personally I think I might like to see more of an Alex Ross rendering type of Superman. An older, more powerful and imposing Superman.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 11:02:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: News Flash: Internet Polls Don&amp;#8217;t Influence Movie Casting</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/news_flash_internet_polls_don8217t_influence_movie_casting/#comment-21633163</link><description>@Margroks&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Hopefully the new producers will bring the final season of Smallville closer to the mythos, but I'm not holding my breath.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 10:43:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: News Flash: Internet Polls Don&amp;#8217;t Influence Movie Casting</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/news_flash_internet_polls_don8217t_influence_movie_casting/#comment-21633155</link><description>@helena&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;No offense taken. :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 10:06:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: News Flash: Internet Polls Don&amp;#8217;t Influence Movie Casting</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/news_flash_internet_polls_don8217t_influence_movie_casting/#comment-21633151</link><description>@helena&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Sorry, I can't say. However I will say that I think Welling would make a great Superman. Unfortunately if they cast him it would mean carrying over the entire Smallville universe into the film.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 09:39:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Shadows Of The Dark Knight: The History of Batman &amp;#8211; Part 1 of 3</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/shadows_of_the_dark_knight_the_history_of_batman_8211_part_1_of_3/#comment-21633134</link><description>No.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Adam West is really Batman.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 22:40:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Possible Watchmen Movie Delay NOT Fox&amp;#8217;s Fault?</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/possible_watchmen_movie_delay_not_fox8217s_fault/#comment-21633111</link><description>UPDATE: A Los Angeles federal judge has set a Jan. 6 trial date for the Fox vs Warner Bros lawsuit, well ahead of the current release date.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 11:11:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Possible Watchmen Movie Delay NOT Fox&amp;#8217;s Fault?</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/possible_watchmen_movie_delay_not_fox8217s_fault/#comment-21633094</link><description>@Mbuckingham&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I don't think I've ever heard Guillermo's name associated with Watchmen.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 10:52:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Screen Rant Guests Live Tonight On /Filmcast</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/screen_rant_guests_live_tonight_on_filmcast/#comment-21633082</link><description>LOL, yeah, they had me bail at the end because they talked about the Uwe Boll movie "Postal" which I haven't seen.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;When they post up the recorded version you can listen to the whole thing and tell me how I did. :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2008 23:51:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Alex Proyas Says No To Silver Surfer Movie</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/alex_proyas_says_no_to_silver_surfer_movie/#comment-21633074</link><description>@High Kaliber&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;We have a weekly open discussion post where you can bring up that sort of thing. Just posted it up.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 09:36:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Alex Proyas Says No To Silver Surfer Movie</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/alex_proyas_says_no_to_silver_surfer_movie/#comment-21633073</link><description>@790&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;You love both Ghost Rider and Speed Racer? Dang dude, how can you possibly enjoy this site? :-P&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 09:35:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Alex Proyas Says No To Silver Surfer Movie</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/alex_proyas_says_no_to_silver_surfer_movie/#comment-21633054</link><description>I've actually heard that the director's cut of Daredevil is MUCH better than the theatrical release, believe it or not.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 23:34:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Screen Rant Guests On The Cinema Blend Podcast</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/screen_rant_guests_on_the_cinema_blend_podcast/#comment-21633027</link><description>@Niall&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;LOL, I'd never thought about that. :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 12:41:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Screen Rant Guests On The Cinema Blend Podcast</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/screen_rant_guests_on_the_cinema_blend_podcast/#comment-21633023</link><description>I used Skype to call in with the other folks who were all together in one room.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2008 03:03:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Weekend Movie News Wrap Up: August 31, 2008</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/weekend_movie_news_wrap_up_august_31_2008/#comment-21633008</link><description>I agree with Rob completely and that's why I'm really hoping Abrams and crew don't muck this up.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Continuing on with the TNG era just seems worn and done to death IMHO.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Going back to the beginning to a period never covered in the films or TV shows is smart. It's what "Enterprise" was supposed to do, but Berman and Braga mishandled that horribly. Done right, that could have been a great show.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 12:44:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Top 10 Summer 2008 Movies: It&amp;#8217;s Been A Hell Of A Run!</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/the_top_10_summer_2008_movies_it8217s_been_a_hell_of_a_run/#comment-21632979</link><description>@Ken J&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Find my review of Wall-E here on the site.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2008 23:47:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Top 10 Summer 2008 Movies: It&amp;#8217;s Been A Hell Of A Run!</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/the_top_10_summer_2008_movies_it8217s_been_a_hell_of_a_run/#comment-21632974</link><description>@Ronnie&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Speed Racer only made $89MM worldwide.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2008 14:06:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Top 10 Summer 2008 Movies: It&amp;#8217;s Been A Hell Of A Run!</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/the_top_10_summer_2008_movies_it8217s_been_a_hell_of_a_run/#comment-21632961</link><description>@wes&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I think the next time we see the Hulk (if we see him at all) will be in the Avengers movie.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2008 00:05:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Top 10 Summer 2008 Movies: It&amp;#8217;s Been A Hell Of A Run!</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/the_top_10_summer_2008_movies_it8217s_been_a_hell_of_a_run/#comment-21632949</link><description>@Gary&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;No, it's not harsh. Indiana Jones is a franchise with HUGE name recognition that had massive anticipation PLUS Lucas and Spielberg attached to it.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Iron Man was a Marvel superhero that a year ago was not very well known to the average person, directed by Favreau - not exactly a powerhouse draw.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Having only $2MM between the two of those speaks highly of Iron Man and poorly of Indy 4.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 31 Aug 2008 15:59:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Top 10 Summer 2008 Movies: It&amp;#8217;s Been A Hell Of A Run!</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/the_top_10_summer_2008_movies_it8217s_been_a_hell_of_a_run/#comment-21632947</link><description>@Phil&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Yikes! Thanks for seeing that. One of the things I hate about laptops: jumping mouse cursor.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 31 Aug 2008 12:51:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Top 10 Summer 2008 Movies: It&amp;#8217;s Been A Hell Of A Run!</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/the_top_10_summer_2008_movies_it8217s_been_a_hell_of_a_run/#comment-21632945</link><description>Doh! Rob, I think you're right. I saw Star Trek on the list and had forgotten it was moved to a Summer release.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Sorry!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 31 Aug 2008 12:23:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Top 10 Summer 2008 Movies: It&amp;#8217;s Been A Hell Of A Run!</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/the_top_10_summer_2008_movies_it8217s_been_a_hell_of_a_run/#comment-21632937</link><description>Oh, BTW gang, I've done some more reading on the whole Warner Bros. vs Fox thing and it's looking like the actual buttheads in this fight may actually be WB and NOT Fox.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 23:42:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Top 10 Summer 2008 Movies: It&amp;#8217;s Been A Hell Of A Run!</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/the_top_10_summer_2008_movies_it8217s_been_a_hell_of_a_run/#comment-21632936</link><description>@Ken J&lt;br&gt;Well, *I* liked Get Smart, doesn't mean you will. Opinions were pretty split on it.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;@Rob&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Yeah, good point, but not all of those fall under Summer '09. :-P&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 23:40:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Top 10 Summer 2008 Movies: It&amp;#8217;s Been A Hell Of A Run!</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/the_top_10_summer_2008_movies_it8217s_been_a_hell_of_a_run/#comment-21632931</link><description>Ok, now don't hold me to the nuances of this list. :-) But here are is my informal list of my favorite films of Summer '08:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;1. Iron Man&lt;br&gt;2. The Dark Knight&lt;br&gt;3. Kung Fu Panda&lt;br&gt;4. Tropic Thunder&lt;br&gt;5. The Incredible Hulk&lt;br&gt;6. Get Smart&lt;br&gt;7. Wall-E&lt;br&gt;8. Hellboy II: The Golden Army&lt;br&gt;9. Hancock&lt;br&gt;10. Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 20:26:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Top 10 Summer 2008 Movies: It&amp;#8217;s Been A Hell Of A Run!</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/the_top_10_summer_2008_movies_it8217s_been_a_hell_of_a_run/#comment-21632923</link><description>Oh! (slaps forehead)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 17:02:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Top 10 Summer 2008 Movies: It&amp;#8217;s Been A Hell Of A Run!</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/the_top_10_summer_2008_movies_it8217s_been_a_hell_of_a_run/#comment-21632921</link><description>Thanks, bud. I'll fix those. It was late when I was writing it. :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 16:14:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Marvel Is Going Anime</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/marvel_is_going_anime/#comment-21632886</link><description>I did NOT like the Marvel Mangaverse, but then I'm not a fan of anime. The thing is, I don't think it's bad... I think I just don't have the taste to appreciate it.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 23:39:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Will Babylon A.D. Cancel Vin Diesel&amp;#8217;s Comeback?</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/will_babylon_ad_cancel_vin_diesel8217s_comeback/#comment-21632868</link><description>@Gary&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Don't waste your money, bud. I hear Babylon A.D. is TERRIBLE.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2008 00:05:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Will Babylon A.D. Cancel Vin Diesel&amp;#8217;s Comeback?</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/will_babylon_ad_cancel_vin_diesel8217s_comeback/#comment-21632855</link><description>Massawyrm over at AICN (who I usually agree with on movie reviews) ripped Babylon A.D. a new one:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.aintitcool.com/node/38119" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.aintitcool.com/node/38119&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 11:10:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Discussion &amp;#8211; August 27, 2008</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/open_discussion_8211_august_27_2008/#comment-21632527</link><description>Yeah, sorry for the delay. Just replied. :-)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 16:36:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Discussion &amp;#8211; August 27, 2008</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/open_discussion_8211_august_27_2008/#comment-21632524</link><description>@Ken&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I have a copy of Planet Earth on Blu-Ray. If you want to buy it email me via the contact form. It's unopened.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 20:14:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Discussion &amp;#8211; August 27, 2008</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/open_discussion_8211_august_27_2008/#comment-21632515</link><description>@Mbuckingham&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thanks and welcome to Screen Rant!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2008 10:59:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Discussion &amp;#8211; August 27, 2008</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/open_discussion_8211_august_27_2008/#comment-21632509</link><description>@the old man&lt;br&gt;Good point, I need to rename it to just "Superman."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;@Brooster&lt;br&gt;Kofi was supposed to write something up on that... that's a totally bogus rumor that has been officially debunked.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2008 10:20:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: X-Men Origins: Wolverine Fact Sheet</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/x_men_origins_wolverine_fact_sheet/#comment-21632499</link><description>Hey Rob, did you get my email? If not, check your spam folder.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2008 10:48:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: DVD Killed The Cinema Star</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/dvd_killed_the_cinema_star/#comment-21632487</link><description>@Daniel&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Oh, HDTV started to gain some steam back then but it didn't explode I think until late last year and this year. I don't recall exactly but heck, didn't they even end up pushing back the all-digital TV thing a couple of years due to relatively low sales of HDTVs?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2008 10:11:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: DVD Killed The Cinema Star</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/dvd_killed_the_cinema_star/#comment-21632480</link><description>Daniel,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;True, but HDTV has only begun to make serious inroads into people's homes this year.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2008 00:25:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Kevin Smith Gives Thumbs Up to Star Trek</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/kevin_smith_gives_thumbs_up_to_star_trek/#comment-21632466</link><description>@Ken J&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;LOL, you know that is one reason I will ALWAYS prefer Kirk over Picard. Kirk was an old school, take no prisoners, "make my day" kind of guy balanced by common sense and compassion.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Picard embodied the era in which TNG was created: Rule by committee, bend over backwards to a ridiculous point in conflicts and worrying about how everyone felt.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2008 00:23:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Kevin Smith Gives Thumbs Up to Star Trek</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/kevin_smith_gives_thumbs_up_to_star_trek/#comment-21632459</link><description>@Rob&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The use of the word "stupid" is pretty strong. Rotten Tomatoes is a well known aggregator of reviews from both "elite" and other reviewers around the 'net and is a good gauge of whether generally speaking a movie is good or not.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Although it might have been more relevant to list the average rating instead of the percent positive/negative.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;As to Kevin Smith: He's a well known personality with a history in the comic book industry whose tastes in sci-fi and superheroes generally represent fans of those genres. He's too crass for my taste (I *hated* "Clerks 2") but I get where he's coming from.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2008 18:16:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Clark Will Finally Fly In Smallville Season 8</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/clark_will_finally_fly_in_smallville_season_8/#comment-21632438</link><description>@huntthejest&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Well it looks like she'll be off the show for at least a couple of episodes. :-P&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2009 17:02:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Clark Will Finally Fly In Smallville Season 8</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/clark_will_finally_fly_in_smallville_season_8/#comment-21632373</link><description>Review of the season 8 premiere is up:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://screenrant.com/review-smallville-season-8-premiere-vic-3735/" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://screenrant.com/review-smallville-season-...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 23:44:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Clark Will Finally Fly In Smallville Season 8</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/clark_will_finally_fly_in_smallville_season_8/#comment-21632366</link><description>@Maria&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Sure, making things different WAS interesting, but at some point the two worlds (CW's Smallville and DC's Superman) have to merge somehow.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And as far as the Lana/Clark thing, what people got sick of was the never ending "will they/won't they" get together thing, with all the false starts and teases.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Just gets old after a while.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2008 12:22:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Edward Norton And Marvel Still Not Getting Along</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/edward_norton_and_marvel_still_not_getting_along/#comment-21634390</link><description>I don't know anything about Edward personally, but my gut tells me he just wanted to make the best film possible and fought for that.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 20 Sep 2008 11:39:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 7 Minute Preview Of &amp;#8216;The Day the Earth Stood Still&amp;#8217;</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/7_minute_preview_of_8216the_day_the_earth_stood_still8217/#comment-21634355</link><description>@bpg131313&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Great post there, bro, despite the fact I disagree with a lot of it. :-P&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;We are not "just animals" just because we're made of the same stuff. Animals don't ponder their self-existance or appreciate art and beauty.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Heck the fact that you sat there, gathered your thoughts and added them to this discussion shows that your more than just an animal.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Best,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 11:24:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 7 Minute Preview Of &amp;#8216;The Day the Earth Stood Still&amp;#8217;</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/7_minute_preview_of_8216the_day_the_earth_stood_still8217/#comment-21634348</link><description>@Bruce&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I don't want to get into a debate in which neither side will convince the other, but... :-P&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I find it very amusing how the catchphrase was changed from "Global Warming" to "Climate Change." Back in the 1970's scientists were predicting another Ice Age, and now it's the opposite.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I find the term "Climate Change" hysterically funny, myself - because that's what the climate DOES... it changes over time.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Maybe someone can explain how we managed to warm up enough after the last Ice Age without the benefit of SUVs, factories and methane from millions of cows? :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;On the other hand of course I think we shouldn't pollute if it can be avoided. I just hate seeing an alarmist view on this (thank you SO much Al Gore) that will end up having dire economic consequences for the entire planet.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;People propose "solutions" without thinking through to the consequences. Corn for fuel? Awesome! Oh, wait, now corn is displacing other food crops, causing other countries to starve and our food prices to skyrocket? Didn't think of that...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And as to oil, do you know how many products are oil based? It's not just for running our cars folks: Plastics, medicine, cosmetics, clothing, shoes, etc., etc.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Of COURSE we need to drill. There are no alternatives in the forseeable future for creating this products, even if we run our cars on whatever alternative. So we need to extricate ourselves from depending on governments that hate us.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I also want to see us develop wind, solar, etc. power, but those things are NOT magic bullets that will wean us off oil in 10 years. Anyone who believes that is being naive and does not have a real-world grasp of the situation.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;/Rant&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2008 14:20:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 7 Minute Preview Of &amp;#8216;The Day the Earth Stood Still&amp;#8217;</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/7_minute_preview_of_8216the_day_the_earth_stood_still8217/#comment-21634346</link><description>@Bruce Montreal&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;First, this is an opinion site, so we express our opinions (as we appreciate you expressing yours).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And sorry, I won't "get over it." Of course not all remakes are bad ideas, but generally speaking remakes of highly regarded older films are.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Believe me, if this turns out to be an excellent film and the message does not turn out to be a bunch of climate change inspired drivel, I'll be the first one to admit I was wrong and eat my words.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But I'm pretty sure I won't have to.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2008 13:38:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 7 Minute Preview Of &amp;#8216;The Day the Earth Stood Still&amp;#8217;</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/7_minute_preview_of_8216the_day_the_earth_stood_still8217/#comment-21634338</link><description>"While I personally agree with that idea,"&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;To quote the star of this film:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Woah.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I guess you don't have kids.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2008 20:17:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 7 Minute Preview Of &amp;#8216;The Day the Earth Stood Still&amp;#8217;</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/7_minute_preview_of_8216the_day_the_earth_stood_still8217/#comment-21634336</link><description>Exactly. So in this version it's all about wiping out humanity if we don't stop "harming" the planet? So human life is less important than plants, trees and other animals? It's more important that earth survives than HUMANITY?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;At least in the original the basis was a concern that we would take our warlike ways out into the universe. Here it's that we litter?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Ugh.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2008 18:23:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Tobey Maguire: The $50 Million (Spider) Man!</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/tobey_maguire_the_50_million_spider_man/#comment-21634313</link><description>Good for him on the family issue! Heck, with that paycheck he'll be able to experience his child's childhood all the way from current age until high school graduation without having to spend another minute away from home. :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And Rob, great idea... wish I'd thought of that. :-P&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2008 12:38:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Smallville Season 8: Bringing You Up To Speed</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/smallville_season_8_bringing_you_up_to_speed/#comment-21634302</link><description>@Dan&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Yeah, those are among the points that make this an "alternate universe" version of Superman.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2008 20:19:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: xXx: The Return Of Xander Cage</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/xxx_the_return_of_xander_cage/#comment-21634264</link><description>@Johnny-K&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;LOL, I'm afraid a lot of comments are heading into the spam filter due to the 3 X's. :-P&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I go through and release them for publication when I find them.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2008 18:12:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Green Lantern &amp;#8216;What The Fans Will Want To See&amp;#8217;</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/green_lantern_8216what_the_fans_will_want_to_see8217/#comment-21634242</link><description>@790&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Dude, I *love* sci-fi/alien movies - it just didn't work in Indy 4. The ending felt totally tacked-on and out of place.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2008 10:26:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Transformers 2 Full Trailer 8 Months Away</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/transformers_2_full_trailer_8_months_away/#comment-21634214</link><description>&lt;em&gt;"Why is everybody trashing the best movie ever made?"&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;ROFLMAO :-D&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 21:11:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Transformers 2 Full Trailer 8 Months Away</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/transformers_2_full_trailer_8_months_away/#comment-21634212</link><description>@DarkGrittyMovieLover&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;You'll fit right in here, bud.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2008 15:49:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Transformers 2 Full Trailer 8 Months Away</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/transformers_2_full_trailer_8_months_away/#comment-21634207</link><description>@Panda&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;em&gt;"There is no possible way to develop 12 or so Transformer characters and human characters."&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Ah, now I see what you mean. That is indeed a difficult task.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Although they managed to do it just fine in the classic WWII film "The Dirty Dozen." :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2008 19:02:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Transformers 2 Full Trailer 8 Months Away</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/transformers_2_full_trailer_8_months_away/#comment-21634205</link><description>&lt;em&gt;"As far as character development, what do you expect from a 2 hour movie?"&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Panda, don't take this personally, but that's one of the most ridiculous things I've ever heard.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;There are literally HUNDREDS of movies (if not more) with amazing character development, many in much less than 2 hours. Hell, you can get decent character development on a 40+ year old half hour episode of The Twilight Zone!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2008 21:52:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Transformers 2 Full Trailer 8 Months Away</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/transformers_2_full_trailer_8_months_away/#comment-21634196</link><description>Here's the thing - I'm NOT a Transformers fan, so for all I know their personalities matched what you guys all know and love.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But to me what was retarded about this movie included:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;- Giant robots that have "lived" for thousands of years, yet at least one of which talked like a stupid 15 year old valley girl.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;- Cliche idiot parents.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;- Putting in an idiot FBI agent.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;- An utterly out of place masturbation joke in the middle of the movie.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;- Robots that were SO complex that during fight scenes I literally could not tell what the hell was going on.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2008 11:53:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: CSI: Miami &amp;#8211; Season 7 Story and Cast Notes</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/csi_miami_8211_season_7_story_and_cast_notes/#comment-21634150</link><description>I haven't checked but maybe try &lt;a href="http://Hulu.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;Hulu.com&lt;/a&gt; or &lt;a href="http://IMDB.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;IMDB.com&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2008 10:13:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Huge Iron Man 2 (and 3!) Movie Update</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/huge_iron_man_2_and_3_movie_update/#comment-21634117</link><description>It's late, and I'm tired so I don't recall the details, but I believe there was a scheduling conflict between the release of an Iron Man sequel and the Avengers movie. The productions will overlap and he won't be able to do both.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 14 Sep 2008 01:33:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Huge Iron Man 2 (and 3!) Movie Update</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/huge_iron_man_2_and_3_movie_update/#comment-21634114</link><description>@the old man&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Sorry, I have seen it and I liked it (at the time). :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;@Ken J&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Good point, but remember that Stane used it as an external power source for the Iron Monger suit. :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 14 Sep 2008 01:02:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Huge Iron Man 2 (and 3!) Movie Update</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/huge_iron_man_2_and_3_movie_update/#comment-21634110</link><description>In the comics Stark built it for himself, but eventually it went to Rhodes.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 13 Sep 2008 23:57:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Huge Iron Man 2 (and 3!) Movie Update</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/huge_iron_man_2_and_3_movie_update/#comment-21634108</link><description>If there's a War Machine/Iron Man smackdown that is going to ROCK!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 13 Sep 2008 23:33:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Clive Owen Channels James Bond In The International</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/clive_owen_channels_james_bond_in_the_international/#comment-21634097</link><description>Has anyone noticed yet who wrote this article? :-P&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 13 Sep 2008 22:36:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Thing Remake Will Be A Prequel</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/the_thing_remake_will_be_a_prequel/#comment-21634092</link><description>@Mike&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Oh, don't worry about the legend. Just as the awful AVP movies didn't affect how people look upon the movies they were based on, neither will this if it stinks.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 14 Sep 2008 22:53:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Clooney &amp;amp; Another All-Star Cast Stare At Goats</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/clooney_amp_another_all_star_cast_stare_at_goats/#comment-21634082</link><description>When some celebs really get "out there" in their off-camera politicizing it be very difficult for me to watch them in films - mainly because for the most part they are all on the opposite side of the aisle from where I stand.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I simply cannot bear to watch Sean Penn in a movie and I think Danny Glover is now on my "do not watch" list. Unfortunately Matt Damon just ventured into that area for me recently, but at least he's basically done with the Bourne movies. :-P&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Don't agree with me? Sue me. That's how I feel.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 14 Sep 2008 19:18:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Cobra Commander Talks G.I. Joe</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/cobra_commander_talks_gi_joe/#comment-21634068</link><description>I played with G.I. Joes WAY too many years ago (back when they were actually just plain old soldiers), so I'm just not terribly excited about this.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 13 Sep 2008 00:38:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Wonder Woman Wachowski Rumors Debunked</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/wonder_woman_wachowski_rumors_debunked/#comment-21634029</link><description>It really is amazing to me that Joel Silver cannot comprehend that Joss Whedon is the guy to tackle this project.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Who in Hollywood has done a better job portraying hot babes as believable heroines?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2008 18:32:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Rambo 5 A Reality</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/rambo_5_a_reality/#comment-21634013</link><description>Eh, I'd rather they left the Rambo series alone. They did the old "delayed sequel" thing, it worked great, and they ended the movie very well with him coming home finally to be at peace.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If they're smart they'll just leave it right there, going out on a high note.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2008 15:28:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Devastator Will Be In Transformers 2</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/devastator_will_be_in_transformers_2/#comment-21633994</link><description>@High Kalibur&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://screenrant.com/review-transformers-vic-791/" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://screenrant.com/review-transformers-vic-791/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2008 10:38:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Devastator Will Be In Transformers 2</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/devastator_will_be_in_transformers_2/#comment-21633989</link><description>True. Lighten up just a teeny bit there, FS. :-P&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2008 23:27:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Devastator Will Be In Transformers 2</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/devastator_will_be_in_transformers_2/#comment-21633987</link><description>LOL, Kofi, I warned you. :-P&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;For the record (as regular readers already know) I couldn't stand Transformers. I sat in the audience literally confused at the cheers coming from the audience while i was thinking "Man, this is awful."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2008 23:13:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Dark Knight Returns (To Theatres) January 2009</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/the_dark_knight_returns_to_theatres_january_2009/#comment-21633967</link><description>@Patrick&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thanks a lot, bro. It's always nice to hear that our efforts are appreciated!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2008 23:00:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Dark Knight Returns (To Theatres) January 2009</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/the_dark_knight_returns_to_theatres_january_2009/#comment-21633964</link><description>@Patrick&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Really? I actually felt like we've been slacking lately.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thanks!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2008 21:10:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Oh Baby&amp;#8230; Iron Man 2 In IMAX And 3D?</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/oh_baby8230_iron_man_2_in_imax_and_3d/#comment-21633948</link><description>I don't think they'll go supernatural. Favreau wants to keep things very grounded in the technological, and Jae Senn is right: the rings ARE technological, albeit from an alien race in the comics.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 14 Sep 2008 19:15:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Oh Baby&amp;#8230; Iron Man 2 In IMAX And 3D?</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/oh_baby8230_iron_man_2_in_imax_and_3d/#comment-21633938</link><description>@790&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Gotta agree with Ken J on this one. I am NOT a fan of the "poking the audience in the eye" effects of 3D. What I would like to see as it becomes mainstream is for the gimmicky aspects of it to go away, and it being used for the subtlety of bringing us into the movie.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2008 21:08:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Oh Baby&amp;#8230; Iron Man 2 In IMAX And 3D?</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/oh_baby8230_iron_man_2_in_imax_and_3d/#comment-21633928</link><description>@790&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Dude, you don't HAVE to see it in 3D. 3D movies also play in regular old 2D when they're released.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2008 17:38:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Top 10 Inevitable Movie Reboots</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/the_top_10_inevitable_movie_reboots/#comment-21633920</link><description>@Praveen&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;You know, that was actually on my original list when I was considering what to include but I ended up pruning it out.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2008 11:54:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Top 10 Inevitable Movie Reboots</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/the_top_10_inevitable_movie_reboots/#comment-21633910</link><description>I think Back to the Future might be more likely as a "delayed sequel," but unfortunately they wouldn't be able to get Michael J. Fox back due to his illness.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It would also be disconcerting to see an actor that always looked eternally young on screen now that he's much older, IMHO.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 13 Sep 2008 16:18:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Top 10 Inevitable Movie Reboots</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/the_top_10_inevitable_movie_reboots/#comment-21633905</link><description>@790&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Group hug.... :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2008 18:10:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Top 10 Inevitable Movie Reboots</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/the_top_10_inevitable_movie_reboots/#comment-21633902</link><description>@Gary&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Matrix 2&amp;amp;3 don't exist. [Waves hand] "These aren't the movies you're looking for."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2008 11:23:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Top 10 Inevitable Movie Reboots</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/the_top_10_inevitable_movie_reboots/#comment-21633899</link><description>@Zipper&lt;br&gt;Robocop! Forgot about that one - it is indeed in the works.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;@790&lt;br&gt;The movies you say you think are awesome continues to amaze me (Matrix 2&amp;amp;3). :-P&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2008 10:12:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Top 10 Inevitable Movie Reboots</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/the_top_10_inevitable_movie_reboots/#comment-21633875</link><description>@Ryan Midnight&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Sorry, bro - I meant "clunker" as in "box office."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2008 15:49:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: In Remembrance: 9-11-2001</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/in_remembrance_9_11_2001/#comment-21633867</link><description>@Kahless&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Yes, I remember it well. The way the Twin Towers were hit was a brutal one-two punch. My wife and I turned on CNN that morning after she head about the first airplane on the radio, and I have no words to describe the feeling that washed over us when that second plane hit.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;What we were watching was *literally* unbelievable.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2008 16:27:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: In Remembrance: 9-11-2001</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/in_remembrance_9_11_2001/#comment-21633859</link><description>Bruce, thanks so much for writing that. I thought about it first thing this morning...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And folks, be warned, I will be keeping a close eye on this comment thread. I do not want it spiraling down into any nastiness between Liberals/Conservatives, Republicans/Democrats or Radical Islam vs. Conspiracy theories.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Just be respectful to each other and towards the memories of those who died and their families.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2008 12:15:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Arnold Schwarzenegger Is (Sorta) In Terminator Salvation</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/arnold_schwarzenegger_is_sorta_in_terminator_salvation/#comment-21633846</link><description>@huntthejest&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Although it hasn't been seen since, I'm telling you the footage they showed at Comic-Con looked pretty damned good.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And McG is capable of tackling serious fare - he directed "We Are Marshall." I thought that was a great movie and when I saw his name as director at the end of the film my jaw hit the floor.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 14:12:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Fringe Series Premiere: Fox TV Has A Winner</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/fringe_series_premiere_fox_tv_has_a_winner/#comment-21633819</link><description>The litmus test for whether someone becomes a regular reader of Screen Rant is their hatred of Transformers. :-P&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2008 20:14:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Fringe Series Premiere: Fox TV Has A Winner</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/fringe_series_premiere_fox_tv_has_a_winner/#comment-21633807</link><description>@The Mantis&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Perhaps you can give us a list of sci-fi/fantasy shows on TV that you think are good.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2008 15:38:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Fringe Series Premiere: Fox TV Has A Winner</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/fringe_series_premiere_fox_tv_has_a_winner/#comment-21633804</link><description>@790&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Well there's no excuse for you not liking Stargage, ESPECIALLY if you're a Star Trek TOS fan. :-P&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Regarding Smallville, that's definitely a like/hate thing. I've made my views on that show clear many times.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2008 12:56:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Fringe Series Premiere: Fox TV Has A Winner</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/fringe_series_premiere_fox_tv_has_a_winner/#comment-21633801</link><description>@Flamestrike&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I didn't like "Transformers" either, but I liked "Mission Impossible 3" and "Alias," although I didn't watch a lot of it is acclaimed as being a great TV series. Heck, I even really liked "The Legend of Zorro."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Keep in mind that Michael Bay was the power behind Transformers and his influence may be more the reason it was lame than Orci and Kurtzman.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Don't throw the baby out with the bathwater.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2008 10:19:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Fringe Series Premiere: Fox TV Has A Winner</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/fringe_series_premiere_fox_tv_has_a_winner/#comment-21633800</link><description>@790 Oh, come ON, dude - the show was very well done and even my wife, who is VERY picky thought it was good. I'm sorry but whenever you disagree with me I will forever remember that you thought that both "Speed Racer" and "Ghost Rider" were awesome. :-P&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2008 10:15:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Death Race Review</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/death_race_review/#comment-21633759</link><description>I finally saw this on DVD and have to agree with Kofi 100%. Sure, I'm a stickler for plot and characterization - but there are also movies that I refer to as "check your brain at the door" flicks that can be enjoyed at a basic level.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Some succeed (like this one, and IMHO "Punisher: War Zone") but others are just plain bad.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Call it a guilty pleasure. :-P&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 16:32:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Screen Rant On /Filmcast Live Tonight!</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/screen_rant_on_filmcast_live_tonight/#comment-21633706</link><description>Hey gang, I've updated the post above with an mp3 recording of the podcast that you can download. :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2008 10:32:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Screen Rant On /Filmcast Live Tonight!</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/screen_rant_on_filmcast_live_tonight/#comment-21633704</link><description>Thanks, it is fun. Moriarity from AICN joined in as well.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 23:55:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Screen Rant On /Filmcast Live Tonight!</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/screen_rant_on_filmcast_live_tonight/#comment-21633701</link><description>Ken, you can always download the recorded version later.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 21:21:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Depp And Hoffman (NOT) Confirmed For Batman 3</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/depp_and_hoffman_not_confirmed_for_batman_3/#comment-21633669</link><description>Well see now here's the deal on this story. I traced it back to the UK site that started it and they had an unnamed source. The thing is, Michael Caine actually brings up a conversation he supposedly had with a WB exec.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Now either the conversation really took place, or he just took the existing story and ran with it, making up the fact that the comment came directly from Warner Bros.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 21:24:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Clark Will Finally Fly In Smallville Season 8</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/clark_will_finally_fly_in_smallville_season_8/#comment-21632358</link><description>@Gary&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Yeah, I mentioned the specific episode in a comment above. :-P&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 16:06:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Clark Will Finally Fly In Smallville Season 8</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/clark_will_finally_fly_in_smallville_season_8/#comment-21632346</link><description>@Rob&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Well, I loved the concept originally and it had its share of decent episodes. If there's anything you can say with certainty about Smallville it's that it is very uneven when it comes to the quality of the episodes.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2008 21:33:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Clark Will Finally Fly In Smallville Season 8</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/clark_will_finally_fly_in_smallville_season_8/#comment-21632340</link><description>John,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Those are some of the "bones" they've thrown us. And the levitation seen was in the very first episode in season 1.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2008 14:36:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Clark Will Finally Fly In Smallville Season 8</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/clark_will_finally_fly_in_smallville_season_8/#comment-21632331</link><description>Yeah, the staff this year has some work ahead of them to bring Smallville back from the brink.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I hope they're up to the task.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 24 Aug 2008 23:58:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Clark Will Finally Fly In Smallville Season 8</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/clark_will_finally_fly_in_smallville_season_8/#comment-21632324</link><description>I don't think so. Although at this point I think he'd make a great Superman, I'm sure WB doesn't want the movie to be tied into the TV series.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 24 Aug 2008 15:47:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Weekend Movie News Wrap Up: August 24, 2008</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/weekend_movie_news_wrap_up_august_24_2008/#comment-21632319</link><description>Yeah, I wanted to see Death Race but I was out of town last week and when I came home I got sick...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;BTW, "Mirrors" was terrible.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2008 17:56:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Superman Officially Goes &amp;#8216;Reboot&amp;#8217;</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/superman_officially_goes_8216reboot8217/#comment-21632256</link><description>Start here:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;1. Dump the kid. Dumbest. Idea. Ever.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;2. If they include Lex, make it no more than a cameo. PLEASE.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;3. No "wallowing in self-pity" crap for Superman/Clark.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;4. No "Clark drinking a beer at a bar."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;5. Give us a villain epic enough to go toe to toe with Superman not only in brains but in physical abilities.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;6. No kryptonite.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 24 Aug 2008 11:35:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Real Punisher War Zone Story</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/the_real_punisher_war_zone_story/#comment-21632214</link><description>@GPA&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Hey bro, I've never even heard of "GPA" until your comment here, so I'm not sure what you're referring to...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2008 21:36:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Real Punisher War Zone Story</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/the_real_punisher_war_zone_story/#comment-21632180</link><description>@Nomad&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Gotcha, edited the post to reflect that. I had interpreted it to mean the re-penned script, but I guess that wasn't the case.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thanks,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 20:17:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Real Punisher War Zone Story</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/the_real_punisher_war_zone_story/#comment-21632178</link><description>FYI, I've updated the post with my thoughts highlighted throughout.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thanks again, Nomad!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 20:01:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Stargate Atlantis IS In Its Final Season Now</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/stargate_atlantis_is_in_its_final_season_now/#comment-21632169</link><description>@Mila&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Yeah, I hear you. Seems like sci fi fans won't have anything space-related to watch after Summer 2009. I hadn't thought about that!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2008 10:15:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Stargate Atlantis IS In Its Final Season Now</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/stargate_atlantis_is_in_its_final_season_now/#comment-21632160</link><description>Yeah, SG-1 should have ended when RDJ left the show... maybe it IS better that they go out while Atlantis is still good, but really, I thought they had at least one more good season left in there.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 24 Aug 2008 23:49:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Stargate Atlantis IS In Its Final Season Now</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/stargate_atlantis_is_in_its_final_season_now/#comment-21632152</link><description>Just watched the two latest episodes. I'm more annoyed than ever that they are ending this series. It has at least another couple of years left in it.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 23 Aug 2008 00:34:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Stargate Atlantis IS In Its Final Season Now</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/stargate_atlantis_is_in_its_final_season_now/#comment-21632148</link><description>Yeah, I thought adding her to the show was done in a pretty half-hearted way and honestly, I was not sad to see her go. I was actually really looking forward to seeing Woolsey develop beyond this season.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 20:34:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Stargate Atlantis IS In Its Final Season Now</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/stargate_atlantis_is_in_its_final_season_now/#comment-21632146</link><description>Yeah, this is truly bizarre news. I thought the show was really coming into it's own, and now they dump it.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;My entire family is bummed.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Yeesh.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 20:06:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 2009 Comic-Con Registration Already Open!</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/2009_comic_con_registration_already_open/#comment-21632099</link><description>Awesome!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 23 Aug 2008 16:31:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 2009 Comic-Con Registration Already Open!</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/2009_comic_con_registration_already_open/#comment-21632097</link><description>We REALLY need to plan a Screen Rant get-together for next year.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 23 Aug 2008 00:33:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Tom Cruise And Sam Raimi Get Sleepy</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/tom_cruise_and_sam_raimi_get_sleepy/#comment-21632068</link><description>LOL, Niall... ANOTHER great Tom Cruise picture. :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 12:06:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Voltron Movie Still On The Way</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/voltron_movie_still_on_the_way/#comment-21631985</link><description>Sorry Frank, there's been no news on this at all AFAIK.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 18:58:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Discussion &amp;#8211; August 20, 2008</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/open_discussion_8211_august_20_2008/#comment-21631955</link><description>Jamie is our resident Superman movie expert and he'll be posting something this weekend. It WILL be a reboot but the "make it dark" thing is most likely just B.S.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 23 Aug 2008 00:33:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Discussion &amp;#8211; August 20, 2008</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/open_discussion_8211_august_20_2008/#comment-21631933</link><description>@showtime&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If you could take a screenshot and email it to vic at &lt;a href="http://screenrant.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;screenrant.com&lt;/a&gt; along with letting me know what browser you're using I'd appreciated it.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thanks,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 19:09:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Discussion &amp;#8211; August 20, 2008</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/open_discussion_8211_august_20_2008/#comment-21631931</link><description>It only seems to happen in IE - I just tried it in Firefox and it doesn't happen in that browser. Don't know why...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 17:06:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Discussion &amp;#8211; August 20, 2008</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/open_discussion_8211_august_20_2008/#comment-21631923</link><description>@Movie Reviews&lt;br&gt;LOL, close to 10 years. :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;@Rob&lt;br&gt;I'm out of town and missed the Death Race pre-screening. I'm hearing both that and Babylon are pretty mediocre.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 10:37:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Watchmen Movie Banned From Release?</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/watchmen_movie_banned_from_release/#comment-21631899</link><description>Hey gang,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I know you want to get this story "out there" so can you do me a favor and Buzz it up at Yahoo? Here's the link:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://tinyurl.com/5kdf5s" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://tinyurl.com/5kdf5s&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thanks!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 01:27:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Watchmen Movie Banned From Release?</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/watchmen_movie_banned_from_release/#comment-21631879</link><description>There is no way in hell that this movie won't be released.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Fox is posturing for big $$$ from WB.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2008 19:55:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Punisher 2 Will NOT Be PG-13, Lexi Still Involved</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/punisher_2_will_not_be_pg_13_lexi_still_involved/#comment-21631757</link><description>@Nomad&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Sorry about that. Sometimes comments get flagged for moderation or mistakenly as spam for various reasons. Rest assured that I check those locations for "false positives" and when I find a valid post I publish it.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;That's where the delay comes from. :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2008 15:19:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Punisher 2 Will NOT Be PG-13, Lexi Still Involved</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/punisher_2_will_not_be_pg_13_lexi_still_involved/#comment-21631749</link><description>Post updated to reflect Nick's comments and a big thank you to him for dropping by!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2008 02:08:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Warner Bros Finally Gets Serious About DC Comics</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/warner_bros_finally_gets_serious_about_dc_comics/#comment-21631692</link><description>Why the heck didn't you guys tell the casting director on the first X-Men movie? :-P&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;SUCH a better fit than Halle...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 21 Sep 2008 00:52:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Warner Bros Finally Gets Serious About DC Comics</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/warner_bros_finally_gets_serious_about_dc_comics/#comment-21631688</link><description>@Kane&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Yeah, can you imagine? The Hollywood machine is very strange - sometimes it's not the casting so much as it is the direction the studio wants for the film that determines the strange choices.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2008 14:47:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: New Green Lantern Script Details</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/new_green_lantern_script_details/#comment-21631624</link><description>@Kel&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I've told you before that if your (or anyone elses) comment does not appear it's because it might have been caught for moderation or mistakenly as spam. I go through those posts and publish the valid ones as I find them. I'm not monitoring it 24/7 so sometimes there's a delay.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2008 15:21:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twilight Snags Harry Potter&amp;#8217;s Release Date</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/twilight_snags_harry_potter8217s_release_date/#comment-21631604</link><description>@joclyn&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I'm removing your email address right now. But rest assured no one has access to it or can see it except me. :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 00:37:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twilight Snags Harry Potter&amp;#8217;s Release Date</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/twilight_snags_harry_potter8217s_release_date/#comment-21631575</link><description>@Sonya&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I can't help you with the UK info, I'm more plugged in to U.S. dates and such.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2008 13:36:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twilight Snags Harry Potter&amp;#8217;s Release Date</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/twilight_snags_harry_potter8217s_release_date/#comment-21631569</link><description>@Elaine&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I haven't heard anything about them moving the release date yet again.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 09:41:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twilight Snags Harry Potter&amp;#8217;s Release Date</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/twilight_snags_harry_potter8217s_release_date/#comment-21631566</link><description>Elaine,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I thought you asked me via the contact form and I replied. I did respond via email saying it would be January 9th.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Check your spam folder. :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 11:48:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twilight Snags Harry Potter&amp;#8217;s Release Date</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/twilight_snags_harry_potter8217s_release_date/#comment-21631556</link><description>The comment count includes trackbacks from other websites, which I do not display.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 16 Aug 2008 22:34:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Tarantino Says Mike Myers Is A Bastard</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/tarantino_says_mike_myers_is_a_bastard/#comment-21631540</link><description>@Max&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;LOL, thanks for singling us out but our opinion of Roth's work is shared pretty much across the majority of movie websites.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I actually gave the first Hostel film a pretty decent review, but no, I haven't seen the second one due to what I had read about it and opinions of other reviewers.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2008 13:28:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Will The Punisher Be PG-13?</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/will_the_punisher_be_pg_13/#comment-21631536</link><description>Thanks to Nomad, there's a new post up regarding the PG-13 vs R-rating mess here:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://screenrant.com/punisher-war-zone-pg13-rated-r-vic-3445/" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://screenrant.com/punisher-war-zone-pg13-ra...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 17 Aug 2008 18:31:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Will The Punisher Be PG-13?</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/will_the_punisher_be_pg_13/#comment-21631532</link><description>I find it difficult to believe that the studio is dumb enough to try to shove what should obviously be an R-rated film into a PG-13 container.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Unless they so desperately think it's terrible that they're grasping at any straw to try to salvage it.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2008 23:18:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Will The Punisher Be PG-13?</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/will_the_punisher_be_pg_13/#comment-21631530</link><description>Hey Nomad, nice to have you here at Screen Rant. Perhaps you should drop a line to Latino Review and see what they have to say about it.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Note there IS a question mark in the title of this post, and we're reporting it is not solid info.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Best,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2008 17:56:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Star Wars: The Clone Wars Review</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/star_wars_the_clone_wars_review/#comment-21631513</link><description>@Capt Jack&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Take some time to look around the 'net for other reviews. You'll see that this is one of the more... generous ones.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 17 Aug 2008 21:18:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Star Wars: The Clone Wars Review</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/star_wars_the_clone_wars_review/#comment-21631491</link><description>As long as George Lucas is in control, it's time to just let it go.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 16 Aug 2008 18:48:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Star Wars: The Clone Wars Review</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/star_wars_the_clone_wars_review/#comment-21631482</link><description>&lt;em&gt;"I think Episode III is actually the best of the entire Star Wars saga."&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Um... wow.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2008 21:47:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Harry Potter 6 Moving To Summer 2009</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/harry_potter_6_moving_to_summer_2009/#comment-21631422</link><description>Just to play devil's advocate here... movie studios ARE a business and they have to position their products to make the most amount of money possible.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;They did the same thing with the upcoming Star Trek movie - moving it from a Christmas '08 release to May '09.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 17 Aug 2008 10:44:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Harry Potter 6 Moving To Summer 2009</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/harry_potter_6_moving_to_summer_2009/#comment-21631409</link><description>@Chip Chief&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I can't take credit for this one, bro. That was Jamie's psychic ability. :-P&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2008 10:25:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Tropic Thunder: Will Boycotts Hurt Or Help?</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/tropic_thunder_will_boycotts_hurt_or_help/#comment-21631358</link><description>Well it was number one, so that counts for something. Maybe the Olympics???&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2008 21:45:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Tropic Thunder: Will Boycotts Hurt Or Help?</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/tropic_thunder_will_boycotts_hurt_or_help/#comment-21631351</link><description>Well they tried to give the same explanation over at AICN but that's like trying to reason with a bunch of starving wolves.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And I'll try to crank out a review of Clone Wars later tonight. I should have already written and saved it for publication but I didn't get around to it.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It was no worse than the recent prequels, but that's not saying much, and there were a couple of things that were highly annoying.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2008 17:45:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Tropic Thunder: Will Boycotts Hurt Or Help?</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/tropic_thunder_will_boycotts_hurt_or_help/#comment-21631348</link><description>Rob,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Review embargoes are misunderstood. I've seen this issue raised before and the fact is that as far as I know pretty much every studio prefers that reviews be published on the day the movie is released.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Every pre-screening I attend regardless of studio has that rule.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I only posted up the Tropic Thunder review early because I saw it at Comic-Con and not at a typical pre-screening.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2008 16:40:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Robert Downey Jr. Talks Up Iron Man 2; Talks Down Dark Knight</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/robert_downey_jr_talks_up_iron_man_2_talks_down_dark_knight/#comment-21631303</link><description>@Daniel F, Ken J, the old man&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;OK, guys let's relax. Old Man, I know that Ken J can be pretty ascerbic, but I think you read too much into his comment.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Ken J, sometimes I do wish you would dial back the edginess in some of your comments.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Daniel F, let's not go down the name-calling accusation path, shall we?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 27 Nov 2008 14:00:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Dark Knight IMAX Review</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/the_dark_knight_imax_review/#comment-21628573</link><description>Kel, if you write a long comment and it doesn't appear, don't get frustrated - it may get caught in the spam filter by mistake. But rest assured that once you hit "Submit" it IS saved and I'll see it and publish it.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 27 Jul 2008 19:29:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Dark Knight IMAX Review</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/the_dark_knight_imax_review/#comment-21628562</link><description>LOL, Shane, I actually think that Heath was much closer to the Joker as seen in the graphic novels (where they can push the envelope more) instead of the monthly comic.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;To me Jack Nicholson as the Joker was... Jack Nicholson. On the other hand Ledger disappeared into the role.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 15:42:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Dark Knight IMAX Review</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/the_dark_knight_imax_review/#comment-21628560</link><description>Probably a variation on Frank Millar's "The Dark Knight Returns" minus the older Batman angle. He'll be considered an outlaw and will have to defeat some bad guy with both the police and public sentiment against him.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 13:23:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Dark Knight IMAX Review</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/the_dark_knight_imax_review/#comment-21628527</link><description>It's not going to beat "Titanic" despite all the opening weekend insanity. Inflation adjusted "Titanic" earned $900MM in the U.S. and almost $1.9 BILLION overseas.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;That's a grand total of $2.7 billion. I'm sorry, but TDK aint' gonna do that. This is a case of "everybody wants to see it on opening weekend."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 12:21:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Dark Knight IMAX Review</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/the_dark_knight_imax_review/#comment-21628522</link><description>No worries, guys. I can see how people might give this a perfect score.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 10:17:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Dark Knight IMAX Review</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/the_dark_knight_imax_review/#comment-21628516</link><description>You would be correct, sir. :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 00:49:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Dark Knight IMAX Review</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/the_dark_knight_imax_review/#comment-21628514</link><description>We've certainly had enough discussion about that, haven't we? :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;We'll know in a few days.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 00:34:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Arnold 2.0 Joins Terminator Salvation</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/arnold_20_joins_terminator_salvation/#comment-21628505</link><description>Oh Lord... we're not going to start that "First!" comment business here, are we? :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2008 20:45:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Watchmen Trailer Is Here!</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/the_watchmen_trailer_is_here/#comment-21628482</link><description>LOL, Rasta, the trailer is NOW right here as well.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2008 19:51:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Watchmen Trailer Is Here!</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/the_watchmen_trailer_is_here/#comment-21628479</link><description>Andy, check out our &lt;a href="http://screenrant.com/tag/watchmen" rel="nofollow"&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Watchmen&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/em&gt; movie page&lt;/a&gt; to learn more about the film.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2008 19:16:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Watchmen Trailer Is Here!</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/the_watchmen_trailer_is_here/#comment-21628475</link><description>Ok, FULL trailer is now online.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thanks again,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2008 17:55:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Watchmen Trailer Is Here!</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/the_watchmen_trailer_is_here/#comment-21628474</link><description>Bloody hell. Thanks for letting me know.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2008 17:49:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Here It Is: The Official Full Star Trek Trailer</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/here_it_is_the_official_full_star_trek_trailer/#comment-21640142</link><description>@huntthejest&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Oh man, EXCELLENT pick for Sulu! Unfortunately it would be too weird to have TWO actors from Heroes on the bridge of the Enterprise. :-P&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 14:00:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Here It Is: The Official Full Star Trek Trailer</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/here_it_is_the_official_full_star_trek_trailer/#comment-21640139</link><description>@Neurotic&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Very. 8-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 14:43:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Here It Is: The Official Full Star Trek Trailer</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/here_it_is_the_official_full_star_trek_trailer/#comment-21640136</link><description>@Neurotic Nomad&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Whatever you want to call it, this new Star Trek movie is to past Trek what Batman Begins and Casino Royale were to their respective franchises.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 13:29:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Here It Is: The Official Full Star Trek Trailer</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/here_it_is_the_official_full_star_trek_trailer/#comment-21640131</link><description>Guys, we're going to have to accept that a lot of minor "canon" details are probably going to be ignored. I mean seriously, (and I'll reiterate I'm a HUGE classic Trek fan) is it THAT important to adhere to whether or not Kirk could drive a manual transmission car?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I mean, seriously.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Another item I just learned is being tossed out is the use of transporter technology in "Star Trek: Enterprise." Apparently in the movie transporters are not yet commonly used to get from ship to planet and vice versa.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Personally, I'm happy with this because I thought it pretty retarded (and nothing more than an "easy out" plot device) that transporter technology had already been around for 100 years by the time Kirk and Co. came on the scene.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 11:53:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Here It Is: The Official Full Star Trek Trailer</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/here_it_is_the_official_full_star_trek_trailer/#comment-21640127</link><description>@Robert&lt;br&gt;&lt;em&gt;"am I mistaken or did that not do that exact thing in the episode from TOS where they went back in time to the 40’s 50’s and beamed up the fighter pilot?"&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The ship did not have Warp drive engaged, that's the issue, not whether it can enter the atmosphere. :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;BTW gang, I just realized... I'm in comic book/sci-fi geek heaven. Back to back years in which both of my favorites in each genre are turned into movies: Iron Man in '08 and Star Trek in '09.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Woo Hoo!! :-D&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 10:32:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Here It Is: The Official Full Star Trek Trailer</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/here_it_is_the_official_full_star_trek_trailer/#comment-21640108</link><description>@Mert&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;He said "James Tiberius Kirk."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;@Sci Fi Geek, of course I knew about the short story. :-) And I prefer the "Decker is replicant" version.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 21:32:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Here It Is: The Official Full Star Trek Trailer</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/here_it_is_the_official_full_star_trek_trailer/#comment-21640104</link><description>@Sci Fi Geek&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;LOL, we've BARELY scratched the surface here. :-P&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 20:23:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Here It Is: The Official Full Star Trek Trailer</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/here_it_is_the_official_full_star_trek_trailer/#comment-21640098</link><description>@Sci Fi Geek&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Dude, you're dealing with Star Trek fans here, bro. We care more about details than fans of any other Sci Fi franchise on the planet (and Paramount has fed into that with the publication of numerous "tech manuals" and such over the years).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Especially considering your screen name, I'd think you would understand that.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Let folks blow off steam, no harm done.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 19:07:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Heroes&amp;#8217; Ratings In Sharp Decline</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/heroes8217_ratings_in_sharp_decline/#comment-21637107</link><description>@C. Bartowski&lt;br&gt;Of *course* Hiro planned what he did to Ando. I thought it was clear in my comment that he did it with the intent to "undo" it.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;@Daniel&lt;br&gt;Yeah, I didn't like the "amateur critic/Joe Sixpack" comment, but I thought I'd let it ride and let Kofi deal with the blowback, if any.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;@790&lt;br&gt;Why make that comment to jc but not to Kofi? Kofi's post was a lot more emotional than jc's point by point critique of the show.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 10:31:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Heroes&amp;#8217; Ratings In Sharp Decline</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/heroes8217_ratings_in_sharp_decline/#comment-21637090</link><description>Regarding the title of my previous post, yes, I was wondering if Heroes had jumped the tracks, plus I wrote it to encourage discussion based on the vibe of previous comments. No "fooling" anyone involved there.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;As far as this season goes, I just watched tonight's episode, and it's official: I'm sick to DEATH of Hiro.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;What happened with Ando will OBVIOUSLY be reversed by a quick jump back in time, and that's one of the most infuriating things about this show. Why, just a little earlier didn't he just time jump back to before he got clocked in the bar????? I mean, seriously, WTF? There have been multiple instances in this show where screw ups could have been fixed via a whopping 2 minute jump back in time, yet for some reason, Hiro NEVER does it. He's not only clueless, the character is starting to border on retarded.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Ando gave the best summary of their exploits as "heroes" I've heard on the show: As heroes, they suck.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And as far as the formula and "we split it up so no one could get their hands on it." Are you kidding me? It's THAT dangerous, it exists on only two pieces of paper, and you didn't just put a damned match to it?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And then there's Suresh - I suppose the excuse with turning him from a goody two shoes into a friggin' sociopath is that the serum has affected his mind, right?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Sure, the show has a cool factor, but the annoyances this season are really getting close to overriding any enjoyment I get out of watching it.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 01:19:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Hulk Smash Puny Avengers?</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/hulk_smash_puny_avengers/#comment-21637040</link><description>@Carl Lee&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I guess you didn't read this post here on the site:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://screenrant.com/kenneth-branagh-direct-thor-vic-3825/" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://screenrant.com/kenneth-branagh-direct-th...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;:-P&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 22:51:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Hulk Smash Puny Avengers?</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/hulk_smash_puny_avengers/#comment-21637036</link><description>@Deadpool&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Remember this version of the Hulk doesn't get bigger as he gets angrier, but I suppose he might get stronger.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;However, I would LOVE to see the Hulkbuster armor. :-P&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;BTW, Favreau has commented on this (and I tend to agree) but I really don't see how a Shakespearean, magic-powered Thor is going to fit into the Marvel universe they're creating for the movies.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 22:27:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Discussion &amp;#8211; September 17, 2008</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/open_discussion_8211_september_17_2008/#comment-21634445</link><description>BTW, I'm going to be giving away copies of the Speed Racer DVD later this week. :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2008 10:14:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Discussion &amp;#8211; September 17, 2008</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/open_discussion_8211_september_17_2008/#comment-21634444</link><description>Hey guys, sorry about the mess up this week... just add to this discussion and things will be fixed next week.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It was late when I was setting this up...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2008 10:07:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Discussion &amp;#8211; September 17, 2008</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/open_discussion_8211_september_17_2008/#comment-21634435</link><description>TDK re-release post is up. :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2008 17:37:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Discussion &amp;#8211; September 17, 2008</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/open_discussion_8211_september_17_2008/#comment-21634433</link><description>@Dan&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;We'll have a post about that hopefully later tonight.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2008 17:13:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Discussion &amp;#8211; September 17, 2008</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/open_discussion_8211_september_17_2008/#comment-21634430</link><description>Zipper,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I do not want to run annoying expanding ads and I remove them when I become aware of them (I don't approve every ad before it runs, that's not how it works, and I've asked the ad networks to not run them). I also do NOT run ads that have audio by default because I realize those are annoying as heck.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I really do try to find a balance between showing ads and not annoying visitors. I don't run popups or popunders either because people complained.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But you need to realize that ads pay the bills. If everyone blocked them, you could kiss Screen Rant goodbye - because I can't put the hours and hours that I put into it plus pay my writers if there is no income generated by the site.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;In the end it might actually be a good thing... I'd spend more time with my family.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2008 10:11:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Discussion &amp;#8211; September 17, 2008</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/open_discussion_8211_september_17_2008/#comment-21634419</link><description>I'm not sure I understand the question. Of course Steve Rogers = Captain America.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2008 16:33:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Supernatural: Recap Plus Season 4 Story &amp;amp; Cast Notes</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/supernatural_recap_plus_season_4_story_amp_cast_notes/#comment-21634406</link><description>@david&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Has the show premiered yet (I don't watch it, myself). We don't get advanced copies of premieres for review so we can't review it until it's aired.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2008 10:12:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Tintin Movie Still Moving Foward</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/tintin_movie_still_moving_foward/#comment-21632799</link><description>Is there anyone who is actually excited about this movie?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 14:16:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Incredible Hulk Blu-Ray/DVD Details</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/incredible_hulk_blu_raydvd_details/#comment-21632763</link><description>@Gary&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Actually it's quite the coincidence, both versions of the Hulk have made almost exactly the same amount of money at the box office, with the latest version slightly ahead.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Check the home page, I just put up a Top Summer Movies post. :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 16:04:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Incredible Hulk Blu-Ray/DVD Details</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/incredible_hulk_blu_raydvd_details/#comment-21632759</link><description>Rob,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Please add something relevant and significant to the conversation. People subscribed to comments and it's a pain getting comment replies in one's inbox with nothing but a smiley or some 2 or 3 word comment.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 00:16:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: New Dragonball Photos Here, Trailer On The Way</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/new_dragonball_photos_here_trailer_on_the_way/#comment-21632697</link><description>@DBthemovie&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;You may be right in saying that to "hate" a movie before even a trailer is released doesn't make sense (I won't use your word), but one can usually predict these things.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I'm not really following "Dragonball," but there have been plenty of cases where based on who the director is, the script, what's going on during production, the studio, etc. that it doesn't take a crystal ball to predict that a particular movie will be awful.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 31 Aug 2008 12:20:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Angry Watchmen Fanboy Calls For Fox Boycott</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/angry_watchmen_fanboy_calls_for_fox_boycott/#comment-21632641</link><description>@Ken J&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Putting projects in "turnaround" is a very common and time-honored practice in Hollywood. It's a way to free up a property while still keeping a string attached to it. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 23:40:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Angry Watchmen Fanboy Calls For Fox Boycott</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/angry_watchmen_fanboy_calls_for_fox_boycott/#comment-21632626</link><description>Yeah, the thing that gets me is they bought the rights to this property about 25 YEARS AGO and did NOTHING with it during all that time.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I mean seriously, in mid 1980s dollars, how much could they possibly have put into development on Watchmen? I'd be surprised if it was anywhere near even $5 million.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2008 22:37:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Angry Watchmen Fanboy Calls For Fox Boycott</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/angry_watchmen_fanboy_calls_for_fox_boycott/#comment-21632616</link><description>Fox doesn't REALLY want this movie "stopped." What they want is a big fat payday and they're making an extreme threat in order to start their negotiating position as far to the "scary" side as possible.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Believe me, they'd be pissed if Warner Bros. pulled the movie from release. It's not what they want to see happen.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;You'll see.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2008 17:15:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Angry Watchmen Fanboy Calls For Fox Boycott</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/angry_watchmen_fanboy_calls_for_fox_boycott/#comment-21632610</link><description>@INK&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Of course, it's not as simple as that and the Devil is in the details with this case.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Fox acquired the rights back in the 80s and when they decided they wouldn't make the movie they put it in "turnaround," allowing other studios a shot at making it. When they did that the rights went to Warner Bros, Universal, Revolution Studios, Paramount and then finally back to Warner Bros.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;This is all over a technicality revolving around Lawrence Gordon, who was supposed to do some technical thing every time a change was made, but didn't.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Here's a short summary:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.slashfilm.com/2008/08/26/new-york-times-explains-the-watchmen-lawsuit/" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.slashfilm.com/2008/08/26/new-york-ti...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2008 15:36:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Will Chris Nolan Return For Batman 3?</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/will_chris_nolan_return_for_batman_3/#comment-21632572</link><description>The third movie in a trilogy is ALWAYS tricky to do well and I think directors are acutely aware of this.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;As far as the Burton Batman movies, the first one was great, but for some reason it seems to be that he made the second one much more campy than the first, I didn't like that at all. Anyone remember the Penguin remote controlling the Batmobile sitting in a little kiddy ride like you find in front of grocery stores?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;What the hell was that?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2008 14:10:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Watchmen Trailer Is Here!</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/the_watchmen_trailer_is_here/#comment-21628472</link><description>I've updated the post with a copy of the Watchmen trailer right here on Screen Rant since Empire has pulled theirs.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2008 17:27:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Watchmen Trailer Is Here!</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/the_watchmen_trailer_is_here/#comment-21628471</link><description>Wow, must be a lot more interest in it than I thought.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I'm working on trying to find another version.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2008 16:48:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Wachowskis &amp;amp; Keanu Are Plastic, Man</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/the_wachowskis_amp_keanu_are_plastic_man/#comment-21628457</link><description>Hey, don't forget to drop a comment at /Film, Comics2Film, TheMovieBlog, FilmSchoolRejects, MTV, ReelComix, IWatchStuff, AintItCool and Cinematical and straighten all those guys out as well since they reported the same thing.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;An oh yeah, no one reported this as VERIFIED.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Best regards,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2008 18:01:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Terminator 4 Teaser Trailer</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/terminator_4_teaser_trailer/#comment-21628424</link><description>@790&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Comments never "disappear." If you don't see it after submitting it may have been flagged for spam or moderation for some reason and I check for those throughout the day. :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2008 16:25:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Transformers 2: Revenge of the Updates</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/transformers_2_revenge_of_the_updates/#comment-21628352</link><description>@Ash Ali&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;You wouldn't believe the number of people who've become regular readers of Screen Rant due to my negative review of Transformers, lol.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;That's the test writers have to pass before they can join here. :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 18:25:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Spirit Trailer: Action Movie Or Soft Core Porn?</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/the_spirit_trailer_action_movie_or_soft_core_porn/#comment-21628332</link><description>@Nikki&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Well they showed more footage at Comic-Con and to say that it didn't impress the crowd would be an understatement.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 13:25:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Spirit Trailer: Action Movie Or Soft Core Porn?</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/the_spirit_trailer_action_movie_or_soft_core_porn/#comment-21628330</link><description>@Techie&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Funny you should say that. My buddy Pete over at /Film said it looked like it could be "the 'Dick Tracy' of this generation."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;:-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 09 Aug 2008 00:41:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Spirit Trailer: Action Movie Or Soft Core Porn?</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/the_spirit_trailer_action_movie_or_soft_core_porn/#comment-21628319</link><description>I may have a chance to meet Gerard Butler at Comic-Con and it will take all my willpower to not say in a gravelly voice:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;em&gt;Tonight we dine in Hell!&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;when I meet him.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;:-P&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 16:46:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Spirit Trailer: Action Movie Or Soft Core Porn?</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/the_spirit_trailer_action_movie_or_soft_core_porn/#comment-21628310</link><description>@jerseycajun Ah, I really enjoyed "300" (for what it was).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 13:01:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Discussion &amp;#8211; July 16, 2008</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/open_discussion_8211_july_16_2008/#comment-21628293</link><description>Yup, it's the big finish for Summer 2008.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 17:39:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Discussion &amp;#8211; July 16, 2008</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/open_discussion_8211_july_16_2008/#comment-21628288</link><description>@nowhereman LOL, thanks, bro. I'll NEVER shave my goatee. :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;@RastaZen Doesn't Statham ALREADY play superheroes? ;-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 11:07:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Superman: Doomsday DVD Review</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/superman_doomsday_dvd_review/#comment-21628281</link><description>@KEL&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Wasn't planning on it, bro.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 01:35:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Superman: Doomsday DVD Review</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/superman_doomsday_dvd_review/#comment-21628277</link><description>I have it in my Netflix queue, ready to watch on my Roku Box when I can find the time.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2008 01:05:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Roku Netflix Box Review</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/roku_netflix_box_review/#comment-21628269</link><description>I'd heard about it for a while but when my friend John over at The Movie Blog reviewed it, it spurred me to check it out. Once the selection grows it's going to be a very cool way to rent movies.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 11:08:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Dark Knight Box Office Hysteria</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/dark_knight_box_office_hysteria/#comment-21628251</link><description>I don't think it will, but I think there will definitely be less than a 50% drop in box office on its second weekend.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2008 11:29:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Dark Knight Box Office Hysteria</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/dark_knight_box_office_hysteria/#comment-21628249</link><description>@Gary Yup, IMAX. Twice. :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;This is definitely going do the $130MM this weekend and will do better than Batman Begins. I watched it with a crowd last night and they really loved it.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2008 09:38:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Dark Knight Box Office Hysteria</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/dark_knight_box_office_hysteria/#comment-21628244</link><description>I just watched for the second time and I have to say I liked it a lot more this time around. I think I brought expectations with me about what kind of film it would be for the first viewing, but once that was out of the way and I accepted it for what it was I found it to be much better than I thought.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Glad I saw it twice before writing my review. :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And Kel, it's apples and oranges - it's like comparing The Empire Strikes Back to Godfather II - they're two very different films.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2008 01:08:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Dark Knight Box Office Hysteria</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/dark_knight_box_office_hysteria/#comment-21628238</link><description>@nowhereman That's exactly what this article is talking about, bro.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;@INK I believe I said that in my post. :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 14:36:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Dark Knight Box Office Hysteria</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/dark_knight_box_office_hysteria/#comment-21628232</link><description>Reality check: In order to make $200 million every single showing of The Dark Knight on Friday, Saturday and Sunday in every theater would have to sell out all seats across the entire country.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 11:15:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Dark Knight Box Office Hysteria</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/dark_knight_box_office_hysteria/#comment-21628222</link><description>Steven if you go to &lt;a href="http://boxofficemojo.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;boxofficemojo.com&lt;/a&gt; they have inflation factors you can plug in to do apples to apples comparisions.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The big comparison is Spider-Man 3, but that only came out last year.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2008 19:22:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Dark Knight Box Office Hysteria</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/dark_knight_box_office_hysteria/#comment-21628217</link><description>LOL, you must be visiting from &lt;a href="http://firstshowing.net" rel="nofollow"&gt;firstshowing.net&lt;/a&gt;. :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2008 19:00:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Watchmen Trailer Is Literally Breathtaking</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/watchmen_trailer_is_literally_breathtaking/#comment-21628186</link><description>@KEL Now THERE'S an idea, bro! Actually it's pretty funny - the first thing in the trailer is the DC Comics logo and then it cuts to a guy with electricity sparking on his forearm. My mind starting racing wondering "What the heck DC superhero is THIS?!" A second later I saw it was Watchmen - and was STILL excited as hell!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 14:39:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Watchmen Trailer Is Literally Breathtaking</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/watchmen_trailer_is_literally_breathtaking/#comment-21628182</link><description>Yeah, you have no idea. You're going to freak when you see the trailer. I would recommend avoiding the crappy Youtube version that will no doubt surface in the next day or two and wait for a high quality version.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;As soon as one becomes available I'll post it here at Screen Rant. :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2008 15:17:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Watchmen Trailer Is Literally Breathtaking</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/watchmen_trailer_is_literally_breathtaking/#comment-21628179</link><description>LOL, sorry about that. Honestly, I'm still trying to wrap my head around it. I'll be seeing it again tomorrow night.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It's an Oscar-level crime drama and not like any Batman or any other superhero movie you've seen. VERY dark and "grown up," not suitable for kids under 10 or so (nor would they enjoy it much).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2008 10:54:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Watchmen Trailer Is Literally Breathtaking</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/watchmen_trailer_is_literally_breathtaking/#comment-21628177</link><description>Bozz, no idea. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Old Man, I think Watchmen will be this year's "Iron Man" at the Comic-Con.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2008 10:03:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Weekend Movie News Wrap Up: July 13, 2008</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/weekend_movie_news_wrap_up_july_13_2008/#comment-21628172</link><description>@Rob I've posted up the trailer for The Spirit, check the home page. I think it looks like a trailer for soft core porn.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 11:05:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Make A Movie, Help Fight Cancer</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/make_a_movie_help_fight_cancer/#comment-21628127</link><description>790 you need to really do some research before bringing THAT topic up.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;1. It's not being suppressed, just not financed by the gov't. Private industry can research it to its heart's content.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;2. Nothing has come from embryotic stem cell research AFAIK, but some possible leads have come from ADULT stem cell research.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2008 20:43:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Make A Movie, Help Fight Cancer</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/make_a_movie_help_fight_cancer/#comment-21628123</link><description>Damn, Richard... I hope your mom is hanging in there. Cancer is a devil of a disease. Bloody insidious scourge.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 13 Jul 2008 22:26:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Journey to the Center of the Earth 3D Review</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/journey_to_the_center_of_the_earth_3d_review/#comment-21628092</link><description>Well for movies like this I review them from the point of view of whether they'll be enjoyable to the target audience, and I was pretty clear on that.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It wasn't terrible, just forgettable. Definitely have to see it in 3D though.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 12 Jul 2008 19:24:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Journey to the Center of the Earth 3D Review</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/journey_to_the_center_of_the_earth_3d_review/#comment-21628090</link><description>8 of the 10 next Disney films are supposed to be 3D.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 12 Jul 2008 13:58:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Journey to the Center of the Earth 3D Review</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/journey_to_the_center_of_the_earth_3d_review/#comment-21628088</link><description>Actually I guess that was a bad word choice - as it's used HERE it's a gimmick, but I actually really enjoy movies in 3D when they DON'T emphasize it.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Of course in that case filmmakers may not bother to use it, but it gives me more of a feeling of being in the movie or watching something "real" than just a 2D representation.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 12 Jul 2008 00:24:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Exclusive: Dan O&amp;#8217;Bannon Scripting &amp;#8216;The Pain Clinic&amp;#8217;</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/exclusive_dan_o8217bannon_scripting_8216the_pain_clinic8217/#comment-21628079</link><description>I really hope this turns out to be good. O'Bannon has written the screenplays for some great movies, but he seems to have dropped off the map now for quite a few years.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 11 Jul 2008 23:27:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Shocking News: Favreau Will Direct Iron Man 2</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/shocking_news_favreau_will_direct_iron_man_2/#comment-21628040</link><description>&lt;em&gt;"So you’re going to milk this story with a headline at least one more time?"&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;No, I just won't create a new post once it is "official" as this one will suffice.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 11 Jul 2008 12:22:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Tropic Thunder Goes Viral With Rain Of Madness</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/tropic_thunder_goes_viral_with_rain_of_madness/#comment-21627980</link><description>That was really pretty hysterical in parts. I just hope that the actual movie is as funny as all the promotional material.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 19:45:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Discussion &amp;#8211; July 9, 2008</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/open_discussion_8211_july_9_2008/#comment-21627974</link><description>Ya know, I really enjoyed the SG-Atlantis season premiere. I think the reason (more than the actual plot) is the fact that I believe that the series has FINALLY picked up the baton from SG-1. It's got the feel, the chemistry and the actors have grown into their roles.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Sheppard no longer looks like a little kid to me - much more rugged and believable as the team leader. Now that the splinter-in-my-eye character Dr. Weir is gone I can really enjoy the show. :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And I won't miss Amanda Tapping, she was little more than a ratings gimmick on the series last season.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2008 11:27:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Discussion &amp;#8211; July 9, 2008</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/open_discussion_8211_july_9_2008/#comment-21627964</link><description>Hey guys, I posted up a story about Favs and Iron Man 2.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 15:36:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Discussion &amp;#8211; July 9, 2008</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/open_discussion_8211_july_9_2008/#comment-21627954</link><description>Wow, where is everyone today?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 12:47:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Digital Media Threatens Conventional Media Advertising</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/digital_media_threatens_conventional_media_advertising/#comment-21627947</link><description>Rob,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;First, I didn't write this article. :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Second, I don't think consumers chose Blu-Ray over HD-DVD so much as it was snuck into the homes of the majority via the PS3 player. People didn't consciously decide to go with Blu-Ray - it just happened to be packaged with a game console.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If it had been flipped around and HD-DVD had been built into PS3 boxes it would have gone completely the other way, so I've gotta disagree with your "choice" comment.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 11:47:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Will &amp;#8216;Fringe&amp;#8217; Push Sci-Fi TV To The Edge?</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/will_8216fringe8217_push_sci_fi_tv_to_the_edge/#comment-21627941</link><description>@Alexis&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Perhaps you need to read some books in order to improve your grasp of grammar because that sentence is just fine, thank you.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 10:59:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Watchmen: New Video Journal And Trailer Update</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/watchmen_new_video_journal_and_trailer_update/#comment-21627923</link><description>Green,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Finally! Someone commented on this post! I was starting to lose faith in our readers. I'm stunned that there isn't a ton of discussion on this.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Have you guys not read the graphic novel? Go buy the damned thing - it's epic.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 15:38:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Wolverine Poses For A New Picture</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/wolverine_poses_for_a_new_picture/#comment-21627899</link><description>Hey Green,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thanks for your concern but it's nothing nefarious - Jim and I are friends. Actually it was my decision as we sent each other very little traffic and I thought his banner here with my cleaner design was much more prominent than mine was over there with his busy sidebar.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 00:36:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Will There Be A Star Trek Preview At Comic-Con?</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/will_there_be_a_star_trek_preview_at_comic_con/#comment-21627888</link><description>Gary, no prob, but my point is why would Paramount discard &lt;a href="http://StarTrek.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;StarTrek.com&lt;/a&gt; to "succeed" or "replace" it with something else? That site already covers much more than the upcoming film - it's basically the portal to all things Trek.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It just wouldn't make much since to discard that site for something new IMHO.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 11:13:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Will There Be A Star Trek Preview At Comic-Con?</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/will_there_be_a_star_trek_preview_at_comic_con/#comment-21627886</link><description>If someone could provide a link to some sort of story mentioning a "successor" to &lt;a href="http://StarTrek.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;StarTrek.com&lt;/a&gt; I'd love to see it.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 01:18:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Will There Be A Star Trek Preview At Comic-Con?</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/will_there_be_a_star_trek_preview_at_comic_con/#comment-21627884</link><description>What do you guys mean by "replace" startrek.com?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Trekweb isn't replacing that site in any official or even unofficial capacity. They don't even do any of their own news, all they do is pull it off of other sites.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 12:49:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Val Kilmer Career Update</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/val_kilmer_career_update/#comment-21627849</link><description>I read quite a bit about the making of "The Island of Dr. Moreau" and Kilmer was a TOTAL prima donna - to the point of almost causing the movie not to be able to be made.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2008 18:24:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: First Trailer: The Day The Earth Stood Still</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/first_trailer_the_day_the_earth_stood_still/#comment-21627773</link><description>FYI, originally they were going to go with some bizarre take on Gort but it seems he will be in humanoid form in the remake after all.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 09:46:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: First Trailer: The Day The Earth Stood Still</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/first_trailer_the_day_the_earth_stood_still/#comment-21627747</link><description>790, I think Gary's point is that with the left-bias of the media and "300" being release during this administration the media WOULD have been all over a story like that like white on rice.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 00:32:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: First Trailer: The Day The Earth Stood Still</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/first_trailer_the_day_the_earth_stood_still/#comment-21627735</link><description>Green, so you read this in a newspaper in Dubai, but THAT you don't question, eh?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The benefit of the doubt is always given to the non-U.S. side of a situation, and frankly, that annoys the hell out of me. And no, that's not directed at you specifically - I mean in general in politics and the media.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Best,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 06 Jul 2008 16:59:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Discussion &amp;#8211; July 2, 2008</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/open_discussion_8211_july_2_2008/#comment-21627452</link><description>Hey guys, I've opened up the spacing and the font size a bit on posts. Does that make it a bit easier to read?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thanks,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 19:14:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Discussion &amp;#8211; July 2, 2008</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/open_discussion_8211_july_2_2008/#comment-21627451</link><description>Ok, the intent of the ads was for them to expand only when the mouse cursor went over them - if they're expanding on their own that was not the intent.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I've contacted the ad network about either fixing the problem or I'll discontinue running the ads.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 18:50:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Discussion &amp;#8211; July 2, 2008</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/open_discussion_8211_july_2_2008/#comment-21627446</link><description>Well it's always been a personal policy for me that I don't want to run ads that annoy visitors. That's why I got rid of popunders and I don't run audio ads.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I didn't even know there was a problem with these new ads because I use Firefox instead of IE and the ads do not expand in that browser.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;So Matt, the expand on their own for you as well? They're not supposed to expand unless you mouse over them.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 14:36:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Discussion &amp;#8211; July 2, 2008</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/open_discussion_8211_july_2_2008/#comment-21627442</link><description>Ok, honest feedback here, is anyone else having issues with the ads? Annoying the heck out of you? Driving you nuts? Let me know.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Rob, the subscription setting is set up exactly like it was on the old site, which is checked by default.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 10:26:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Discussion &amp;#8211; July 2, 2008</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/open_discussion_8211_july_2_2008/#comment-21627441</link><description>Liz, go see both, just go to a daytime matinee instead of the evening show and you can see both for a little over the price of one evening showing ticket. :-)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 10:24:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Terminator 4 Gets Helena Bonham Carter!</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/terminator_4_gets_helena_bonham_carter/#comment-21627397</link><description>Surma, no worries, bud. Terminator has a legacy and the first couple in the series are classics so there's interest in this one as well.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Plus, we cover mainly sci-fi, superhero and action movies here on Screen Rant and this fits right in. :-)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 01:05:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Terminator 4 Gets Helena Bonham Carter!</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/terminator_4_gets_helena_bonham_carter/#comment-21627391</link><description>Surma, what movies in particular are you referring to?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 17:56:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Dark Knight: Heath Ledger News &amp;amp; Sky-High Ticket Sales</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/the_dark_knight_heath_ledger_news_amp_sky_high_ticket_sales/#comment-21627346</link><description>Well in many movies the villain can be more interesting than the good guy. :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I'm REALLY looking forward to seeing this. All my buds who made it to the press junket this past weekend are absolutely RAVING about how awesome TDK was.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 22:32:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Battlestar Galactica TV Movies In The Pipeline?</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/battlestar_galactica_tv_movies_in_the_pipeline/#comment-21627313</link><description>I think we're going to have to start getting used to two things:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;$4/gallon gasoline.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;10 month hiatuses between seasons on TV shows.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 02:08:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Wall-E Review</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/wall_e_review/#comment-21627309</link><description>@Matt&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Maybe best technically, but I'm not drinking the Kool-Aid. Story-wise it was not their best.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 17:59:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Wall-E Review</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/wall_e_review/#comment-21627304</link><description>Pixar did not make Happy Feet, which I have never seen.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 01:03:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Wall-E Review</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/wall_e_review/#comment-21627300</link><description>&lt;em&gt;"Anyone feeling another Pixar Oscar on &lt;br&gt;the cards?"&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Well there's not much in the way of competition for best animated film, so, yes.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 17:30:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Robert Downey Jr. Talks Up Iron Man 2; Talks Down Dark Knight</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/robert_downey_jr_talks_up_iron_man_2_talks_down_dark_knight/#comment-21631281</link><description>@PhotoShoplifter Dan&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Yes, I did. Very cute. :-P&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2008 11:38:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Robert Downey Jr. Talks Up Iron Man 2; Talks Down Dark Knight</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/robert_downey_jr_talks_up_iron_man_2_talks_down_dark_knight/#comment-21631272</link><description>I'm pretty sure RDJ was joking and laughing when he said that, but it didn't come across in the text version.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 09:38:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Robert Downey Jr. Talks Up Iron Man 2; Talks Down Dark Knight</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/robert_downey_jr_talks_up_iron_man_2_talks_down_dark_knight/#comment-21631268</link><description>@Matt&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Yeah, anyone who is a fan of Iron Man comics noticed that easily. :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2008 14:08:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Robert Downey Jr. Talks Up Iron Man 2; Talks Down Dark Knight</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/robert_downey_jr_talks_up_iron_man_2_talks_down_dark_knight/#comment-21631235</link><description>@BRAVEHEART&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Sorry, but your opinion (which you're entitled to) doesn't hold up to the vast majority.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Here are the scores from some of the biggest review sites online, and where possible I used user reviews instead of critics to avoid the argument concerning "elite" opinions.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;All scores are from a scale of 0 to 10.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;IMDB | RottenTomatoes | MetaCritic |Yahoo Movies&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Spider-Man 3: 6 | 6.2 | 6 | 6.2&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The Dark Knight: 9.2 | 9.1 | 9 | 9.2&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;That's pretty definitive.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2008 14:27:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Robert Downey Jr. Talks Up Iron Man 2; Talks Down Dark Knight</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/robert_downey_jr_talks_up_iron_man_2_talks_down_dark_knight/#comment-21631199</link><description>@Risa&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;LOL, yeah I hear ya. It just kind of devolved.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2008 14:34:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Robert Downey Jr. Talks Up Iron Man 2; Talks Down Dark Knight</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/robert_downey_jr_talks_up_iron_man_2_talks_down_dark_knight/#comment-21631196</link><description>@the old man&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;LOL, you'll have to ask Kofi. :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2008 10:26:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Robert Downey Jr. Talks Up Iron Man 2; Talks Down Dark Knight</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/robert_downey_jr_talks_up_iron_man_2_talks_down_dark_knight/#comment-21631194</link><description>I'm with Kane. This is really a pointless debate. "My superhero is better than YOUR superhero!"&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Come on guys, we were blessed with a couple of fantastic superhero movies this year, let's be happy about that!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Comparing TDK and Iron Man is apples and oranges, they're just not equivalent. They were both great but each on its own level.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2008 01:47:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Robert Downey Jr. Talks Up Iron Man 2; Talks Down Dark Knight</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/robert_downey_jr_talks_up_iron_man_2_talks_down_dark_knight/#comment-21631163</link><description>@Daniel&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Wow... that's quite a statement, bud.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I'm pretty sure that at least some amount of brain power is involved in running this site and I enjoyed Iron Man more that TDK.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2008 19:03:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Robert Downey Jr. Talks Up Iron Man 2; Talks Down Dark Knight</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/robert_downey_jr_talks_up_iron_man_2_talks_down_dark_knight/#comment-21631160</link><description>Sorry Risa, there isn't. But I went in and added something to the end of your post which I think addresses what you're referring to.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Commenters who care about the quality of their writing... I love it! :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2008 18:33:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Robert Downey Jr. Talks Up Iron Man 2; Talks Down Dark Knight</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/robert_downey_jr_talks_up_iron_man_2_talks_down_dark_knight/#comment-21631145</link><description>&lt;em&gt;"Yeah! Numbers don’t lie! The Phantom Menace was a brilliant, well-crafted and solidly written film!"&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Rimshot! Bud-um-BUM. :-P&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2008 11:27:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Very Strange Watchmen Movie Update</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/very_strange_watchmen_movie_update/#comment-21630909</link><description>@smith&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Did someone fart? :-p&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;BTW, I don't disagree with you on possible overload this early on. But this is a movie news site and we cover what's out there.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 13:27:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Very Strange Watchmen Movie Update</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/very_strange_watchmen_movie_update/#comment-21630903</link><description>@Dentist&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Nope.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2008 20:06:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Very Strange Watchmen Movie Update</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/very_strange_watchmen_movie_update/#comment-21630897</link><description>LOL, ok... point taken. :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2008 15:51:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Second Set Of Star Trek Character Posters</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/second_set_of_star_trek_character_posters/#comment-21630891</link><description>@Nero&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Because the "fuzzy" versions become available online 3 days before they arrived on the official website.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;That's why.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 12:47:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Second Set Of Star Trek Character Posters</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/second_set_of_star_trek_character_posters/#comment-21630875</link><description>@Terry&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;What's your favorite TV and/or movie series? Just curious.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2008 10:49:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Second Set Of Star Trek Character Posters</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/second_set_of_star_trek_character_posters/#comment-21630868</link><description>@790 You are absolutely correct, so I rationalized a solution that would fit within canon. :-P&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2008 01:00:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Second Set Of Star Trek Character Posters</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/second_set_of_star_trek_character_posters/#comment-21630861</link><description>Gotta say I agree with Liz.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Regarding Chekov, I always figured he was on the Enterprise in season one of TOS, but just hadn't been assigned to the bridge yet.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 10 Aug 2008 22:17:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Crazy Tech Behind James Cameron&amp;#8217;s Avatar</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/the_crazy_tech_behind_james_cameron8217s_avatar/#comment-21630835</link><description>Yeah, but Cameron's a great director. George Lucas' Star Wars I, II and III were all about technology, but he can't direct (or cast actors) worth a damn.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;At least with Cameron you're likely to get a compelling story from good performances.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 09 Aug 2008 19:16:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Crazy Tech Behind James Cameron&amp;#8217;s Avatar</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/the_crazy_tech_behind_james_cameron8217s_avatar/#comment-21630833</link><description>@Zipper&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;You can find as much as is known about the plot on our &lt;a href="http://screenrant.com/tag/avatar/" rel="nofollow"&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Avatar&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/em&gt; movie page&lt;/a&gt;.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 09 Aug 2008 15:40:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Crazy Tech Behind James Cameron&amp;#8217;s Avatar</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/the_crazy_tech_behind_james_cameron8217s_avatar/#comment-21630823</link><description>Yeah, I'm trying not to think about it too much. Knowing Cameron it's going to end up blowing the audience through the back of the theater with how cool it is.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;We ARE talking about the man who directed my all time favorite film: "Aliens." And yes, dammit, I actually enjoyed "Titanic."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Sue me. :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 09 Aug 2008 00:43:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Sam Jackson Has The Hots For Afro Samurai</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/sam_jackson_has_the_hots_for_afro_samurai/#comment-21630817</link><description>Thanks for letting us know! Links are fixed.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 18:37:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Iron Man DVD Details</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/iron_man_dvd_details/#comment-21630797</link><description>@Homer&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Dude, I have NO time to play video game, no point to my getting a PS3. :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 10 Aug 2008 12:28:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Bitch Slap: Grindhouse Done Right?</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/bitch_slap_grindhouse_done_right/#comment-21630748</link><description>@Greg&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Hey, I know some people liked it. Me, I remember actually thinking during the movie that if I had a fork I would have gouged my eyes out rather than watch it.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If I hadn't intended on writing a review I would have walked out (as much of the audience did during Tarantino's half).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 11:21:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Bitch Slap: Grindhouse Done Right?</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/bitch_slap_grindhouse_done_right/#comment-21630746</link><description>Liz! One of your comments finally made it through without getting caught in the spam filter! :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And the only part I liked about "Death Proof" was probably the first 15 minutes or so.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 01:19:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Tropic Thunder Review</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/tropic_thunder_review/#comment-21630721</link><description>Don't think so. Don't worry about it.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 12:48:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Tropic Thunder Review</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/tropic_thunder_review/#comment-21630719</link><description>Wow, I don't know how I let those anti-semitic comments slip through a while back. I've deleted them and the last couple of response comments.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 11:55:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Tropic Thunder Review</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/tropic_thunder_review/#comment-21630709</link><description>@WAYLIFE&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Well I made that VERY clear in my review. As a matter I have a lot of friends who I told NOT to go see it quite explicitly.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It's not for everyone, but I did find it funny myself.'&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 23 Aug 2008 17:04:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Tropic Thunder Review</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/tropic_thunder_review/#comment-21630703</link><description>Sometimes there are ticket giveaways on radio and tv stations and non-press can attend. That was the case here.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 09 Aug 2008 15:22:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Tropic Thunder Review</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/tropic_thunder_review/#comment-21630701</link><description>Rob,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I actually saw it at Comic-Con two weeks ago and just figured I'd go ahead and write up the review. Usually I go to screenings and I'm obligated to wait until the day of release.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It comes out on August 15th.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 23:33:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Tropic Thunder Review</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/tropic_thunder_review/#comment-21630696</link><description>I totally forgot to mention the awesomeness that was Tom Cruise in the movie. I saw it a couple of weeks ago and it slipped my mind somehow. He was fantastic.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 14:57:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Brand New Twilight Movie Images</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/brand_new_twilight_movie_images/#comment-21630652</link><description>"you cant judge a book by its film"&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Agree completely with that statement.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 31 Aug 2008 15:12:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Brand New Twilight Movie Images</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/brand_new_twilight_movie_images/#comment-21630617</link><description>Lisa&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I would bet $100 right now that it will be PG-13.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2008 14:19:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Brand New Twilight Movie Images</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/brand_new_twilight_movie_images/#comment-21630604</link><description>Well ladies, although I'm pretty sure it won't do much for me I hope the film lives up to your expectations. :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 12:55:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Brand New Twilight Movie Images</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/brand_new_twilight_movie_images/#comment-21630602</link><description>@Rob We're not the target audience, bud. :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 10:42:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Movie Grab Bag &amp;#8211; August 6, 2008</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/movie_grab_bag_8211_august_6_2008/#comment-21630596</link><description>Andy, now you can appreciate how hard we work at providing quality content. :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 10:39:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Discussion &amp;#8211; August 6, 2008</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/open_discussion_8211_august_6_2008/#comment-21630574</link><description>There's nothing left to do after Ep. 6. The actors are all WAY too old, the conflict is over, etc.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Although I agree that setting this between II &amp;amp; III is weird. I guess Anakin is the new Luke. I'd prefer to see what happens between III &amp;amp; IV, as having this fill in a gap where we already know the outcome is just... odd.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2008 10:50:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Discussion &amp;#8211; August 6, 2008</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/open_discussion_8211_august_6_2008/#comment-21630569</link><description>@David Just shot you an email, bro.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;@Gary Yeah, I've got to decide if I can churn out a full review or not. :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2008 00:17:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Discussion &amp;#8211; August 6, 2008</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/open_discussion_8211_august_6_2008/#comment-21630566</link><description>Guys, Clone Wars was actually not bad - better than the latest three movies. And kids are going to eat it up so I'll bet it's going to make some nice bank on opening weekend.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I'm concerned about Mirrors because it looks like they're not pre-screening it for critics... ALWAYS a bad sign.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 10 Aug 2008 18:32:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Discussion &amp;#8211; August 6, 2008</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/open_discussion_8211_august_6_2008/#comment-21630560</link><description>@Gary&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If I had to pick, I'd probably go see Pineapple Express. Don't know if I'd like it or not but a lot of people seem to.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 23:34:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Discussion &amp;#8211; August 6, 2008</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/open_discussion_8211_august_6_2008/#comment-21630551</link><description>@Ash&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I tried doing a few podcasts a while back but hated doing them alone. Plus it's really hard for me to make the time to do one on a regular basis. I may do some guest "appearances" on /Film's podcast, though.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 10:41:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Discussion &amp;#8211; August 6, 2008</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/open_discussion_8211_august_6_2008/#comment-21630545</link><description>I watched the season premiere of Heroes at Comic-Con and it was very good. I think fans will be VERY satisfied.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 01:05:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Review: Terminator: The Sarah Connor Chronicles Season One</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/review_terminator_the_sarah_connor_chronicles_season_one/#comment-21630535</link><description>I may have to drop season one into my Netflix queue and check it out before season two begins.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 19:00:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: What Is Going On With Punisher: War Zone?</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/what_is_going_on_with_punisher_war_zone/#comment-21630492</link><description>Aw hell no - Gale has been behind some of the most awesome movies of the last 20 years.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 00:05:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: What Is Going On With Punisher: War Zone?</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/what_is_going_on_with_punisher_war_zone/#comment-21630490</link><description>@Mike&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Yes, mooning "the vicious cyber world" which has been slamming Lionsgate for supposedly pulling her off the movie.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 23:37:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: What Is Going On With Punisher: War Zone?</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/what_is_going_on_with_punisher_war_zone/#comment-21630488</link><description>She wrote something pretty offensive to the online movie community on her updated page. I mentioned it in yesterday's Grab Bag post.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If I'm reading her comment correctly, I hope this movie bombs.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 15:14:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Green Lantern Green Lit; Is JLA On Deck?</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/green_lantern_green_lit_is_jla_on_deck/#comment-21630461</link><description>@Mike&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Keep in mind I'm not arguing with you, I consider this healthy debate. :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I certainly didn't "worship at the altar of RDJ" before the film came out, and I'm sure that the majority of people who contributed to half a billion dollars in box office reciepts didn't either. I thought he captured the essence of Stark very well.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And now you have me a bit confused - overall fans of the comic were pleased with him playing the part, but from your comment:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;em&gt;"Remember, the fans of the comic book are in the minority, which is probably what your site caters to."&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I'm a bit confused. Yes, fans of the comic book (and my sites cater to them), who are in the minority had no problem with RDJ in the role for the most part, but neither did non-comic fans.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;So from whose point of view are you speaking (besides your own, of course).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Best,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2008 15:27:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Green Lantern Green Lit; Is JLA On Deck?</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/green_lantern_green_lit_is_jla_on_deck/#comment-21630457</link><description>@Mike&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;LOL, I'd have to say very few would agree with you about RDJ being miscast, especially fans of the Iron Man comic.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And I should know, I run the &lt;a href="http://www.advancediron.org" rel="nofollow"&gt;most popular Iron Man fan site&lt;/a&gt; on the web. :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2008 13:58:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Green Lantern Green Lit; Is JLA On Deck?</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/green_lantern_green_lit_is_jla_on_deck/#comment-21630452</link><description>@Mike Shields&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;On the other hand you have Jon Favreau and Iron Man. He paid attention to comic book fans big time and look how THAT turned out.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2008 01:05:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Green Lantern Green Lit; Is JLA On Deck?</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/green_lantern_green_lit_is_jla_on_deck/#comment-21630425</link><description>Chip Chief now I just KNOW you're just trying to rile people up, lol.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 14:28:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: DVD Giveaway: Masters of Science Fiction</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/dvd_giveaway_masters_of_science_fiction/#comment-21630409</link><description>John,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Did you not see the big, all caps, bold message at the top of the post? :-P&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 28 Dec 2008 22:16:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: DVD Giveaway: Masters of Science Fiction</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/dvd_giveaway_masters_of_science_fiction/#comment-21630405</link><description>OK, the contest is open to residents of Canada as well. :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 12:32:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: DVD Giveaway: Masters of Science Fiction</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/dvd_giveaway_masters_of_science_fiction/#comment-21630404</link><description>Ok, let me find out if my Canadian brothers can be included. :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 00:04:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Keanu Reeves To Star In Cowboy Bebop</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/keanu_reeves_to_star_in_cowboy_bebop/#comment-21630323</link><description>@Katia&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I'm with you. I'm glad some of my boyz here at SR are interested enough to cover it. :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 02:56:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Keanu Reeves To Star In Cowboy Bebop</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/keanu_reeves_to_star_in_cowboy_bebop/#comment-21630309</link><description>LOL, thanks Rev. BTW, he followed up with a couple of comments in the same vein that went into moderation, and he's now banned.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 13:26:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Johnny Depp As The Riddler In The Dark Knight Sequel?</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/johnny_depp_as_the_riddler_in_the_dark_knight_sequel/#comment-21630114</link><description>Nolan has said recently that in his Batman universe there are no superheroes.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 13:25:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Johnny Depp As The Riddler In The Dark Knight Sequel?</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/johnny_depp_as_the_riddler_in_the_dark_knight_sequel/#comment-21629933</link><description>I think an actor would have to be either:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;A. An idiot&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;or&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;B. A newbie desperate to break into the biz&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;to try and follow Ledger's performance in the same role.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2008 12:20:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Johnny Depp As The Riddler In The Dark Knight Sequel?</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/johnny_depp_as_the_riddler_in_the_dark_knight_sequel/#comment-21629856</link><description>Daniel,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I meant within the context of the movie series, not the comic book.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Nothing worse than killing a character only to bring them back and say to the audience "Psyche! He wasn't really dead."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I flippin' HATE that.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 03 Aug 2008 16:00:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Johnny Depp As The Riddler In The Dark Knight Sequel?</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/johnny_depp_as_the_riddler_in_the_dark_knight_sequel/#comment-21629849</link><description>I'd hate to see them bring back Two-Face. That would be a cop out and hurt the integrity of the series. Speculation aside, the guy should be dead at the end of TDK.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I think Azrael would indeed be a great villain. Personally I hope they take their time and do it right if they make a third film. This one is going to be very hard to top.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 03 Aug 2008 01:45:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Screen Rant Focus: Twilight</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/screen_rant_focus_twilight/#comment-21629702</link><description>Ah, ok. I didn't notice this was a two-page post.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Well this is an opinion site and that was my writer's opinion (although I probably wouldn't have said that, myself).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;BTW, I corrected the spelling on Anne Rice.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2008 11:40:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Screen Rant Focus: Twilight</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/screen_rant_focus_twilight/#comment-21629700</link><description>@Tamara&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I searched this entire page and nowhere do I see a comment or in the post itself a reference to "stifled housewives, still age eighteen in their heads."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 12:23:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Screen Rant Focus: Twilight</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/screen_rant_focus_twilight/#comment-21629693</link><description>MTR, thanks, the article has been corrected.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2008 15:44:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: New Watchmen Images From Empire Magazine</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/new_watchmen_images_from_empire_magazine/#comment-21629683</link><description>LOL, no idea how to edit smileys.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Regarding the graphic novel, it was initially published as a monthly mini-series but you can now pick it up in one volume as a softcover for about $20.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2008 14:27:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: New Watchmen Images From Empire Magazine</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/new_watchmen_images_from_empire_magazine/#comment-21629674</link><description>Go to our Watchmen page, Kofi did a mega post that covers what the story is about.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And it does seem that they're ramping up the press a bit early.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 22:22:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Is Ghostbusters 3 Really Going To Happen?</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/is_ghostbusters_3_really_going_to_happen/#comment-21629601</link><description>@Ryan&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Hence the quote "I don’t buy a word of any of this" and the question mark in the title of the article. :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 10:46:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Discussion &amp;#8211; July 30, 2008</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/open_discussion_8211_july_30_2008/#comment-21629454</link><description>Ok, I've dropped some movies that have passed and added a few new categories.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thanks for the feedback!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 11:01:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Discussion &amp;#8211; July 30, 2008</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/open_discussion_8211_july_30_2008/#comment-21629453</link><description>LOL, good call on dumping The Happening. And Gary, Tropic Thunder and Mummy 3 are VERY different movies. :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Tropic was rude and crass but I loved it.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 10:43:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Discussion &amp;#8211; July 30, 2008</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/open_discussion_8211_july_30_2008/#comment-21629448</link><description>Ah... I have to make some time to review Tropic Thunder. Writing reviews is a lot harder than just writing up the latest movie news so I have to twist my own arm to get those done sometimes.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 01:32:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Discussion &amp;#8211; July 30, 2008</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/open_discussion_8211_july_30_2008/#comment-21629440</link><description>While I'm thinking about it, if there are any hot upcoming movies that are missing from the list on the right that we've covered here, please let me know so I can add them.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thanks,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 17:18:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Discussion &amp;#8211; July 30, 2008</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/open_discussion_8211_july_30_2008/#comment-21629435</link><description>@Braveheart&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Hype does not influence my movie reviews. As a matter of fact pre-release hype often causes me to UNDER-rate a movie. There's no denying TDK was an excellent film, although I agree it did have some flaws and should have been shorter.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But to say it's worse than Spider-Man 3? Uh, I don't think so.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 15:09:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Discussion &amp;#8211; July 30, 2008</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/open_discussion_8211_july_30_2008/#comment-21629431</link><description>It's a toss up between TDESS and Twilight, but I'm betting that Twilight will have a pretty monstrous opening.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Looks like it has a voracious fanbase that rivals Harry Potter...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 02:39:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Common Sense Prevails: Robocop To Be Rated R</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/common_sense_prevails_robocop_to_be_rated_r/#comment-21629288</link><description>@Neofcon&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;You are correct, but doing a reboot of a hard-R series like Robocop as a PG-13 film would be, in a word: stupid.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 16:41:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Common Sense Prevails: Robocop To Be Rated R</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/common_sense_prevails_robocop_to_be_rated_r/#comment-21629277</link><description>Too early to tell at this point.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 00:27:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Awesome Terminator Salvation Poster</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/awesome_terminator_salvation_poster/#comment-21629268</link><description>@Richard I'm talking about the brand new one that debuted at Comic-Con. MUCH more footage than the teaser you're talking about and that we have here:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://screenrant.com/tag/terminator-salvation/" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://screenrant.com/tag/terminator-salvation/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 18:13:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Lexi Alexander Punished By Lionsgate?</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/lexi_alexander_punished_by_lionsgate/#comment-21629228</link><description>The "thrash rock" soundtrack of the new trailer made me want to run in the opposite direction of this film.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 15:47:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: San Diego Comic-Con &amp;#8216;08 Wrap Up</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/san_diego_comic_con_821608_wrap_up/#comment-21629220</link><description>Gary, a post on the Punisher situation will be online in a few minutes.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 14:51:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: San Diego Comic-Con &amp;#8216;08 Wrap Up</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/san_diego_comic_con_821608_wrap_up/#comment-21629214</link><description>Gah! Did I get the year wrong in the post?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 20:48:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Comic-Con &amp;#8216;08: Stargate Atlantis Panel</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/comic_con_821608_stargate_atlantis_panel/#comment-21629188</link><description>Morjana, thanks for pointing that out. Didn't seem right to me when I read it either so I corrected the post for Bruce.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 01:58:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Comic-Con &amp;#8216;08: Day 4 Wrap Up</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/comic_con_821608_day_4_wrap_up/#comment-21629161</link><description>The concept itself is a narrow niche, and especially considering the poor performance of those I don't think we'll be seeing any big studio grindhouse movies.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;"Bitch Slap" is an independent production and I'm going dig up some more info on it and do a post pretty soon as it might turn out to be pretty funny on that level.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 27 Jul 2008 13:54:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Comic-Con &amp;#8216;08: Terminator Salvation Panel</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/comic_con_821608_terminator_salvation_panel/#comment-21629125</link><description>Yeah, I don't think he meant that in an all-encompassing way - he was just referring to it in the context of the film and how we may be on the brink of Armageddon and not realize it.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 26 Jul 2008 19:18:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Comic-Con &amp;#8216;08: Day 3 Wrap Up</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/comic_con_821608_day_3_wrap_up/#comment-21629114</link><description>Thanks, Gary. Hey bud, hit me up at &lt;a href="http://twitter.com/screenrant" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://twitter.com/screenrant&lt;/a&gt; and we can get together after the Terminator panel!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 26 Jul 2008 16:17:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Comic-Con &amp;#8216;08: Day 3 Wrap Up</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/comic_con_821608_day_3_wrap_up/#comment-21629112</link><description>Paramount is providing free wi-fi at the Con this year in a promotion for "Eagle Eye."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 26 Jul 2008 13:27:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Comic-Con &amp;#8216;08: Day 3 Wrap Up</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/comic_con_821608_day_3_wrap_up/#comment-21629110</link><description>@Rob That's "el mayimbe" from Latino Review. He gets access to a lot of scripts - unofficially.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 26 Jul 2008 12:20:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Stargate Continuum Red Carpet Premiere</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/stargate_continuum_red_carpet_premiere/#comment-21629102</link><description>Thanks Moriana, being a huge fan of the series I was geeking out big time. :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 26 Jul 2008 06:19:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Comic-Con &amp;#8216;08: The Spirit</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/comic_con_821608_the_spirit/#comment-21629099</link><description>Rob,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;You can see the new trailer at IGN right here:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://movies.ign.com/dor/objects/382367/punisher-war-zone/videos/punisher_warzone_072308.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://movies.ign.com/dor/objects/382367/punish...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 20:16:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Wolfman Update From Comic-Con</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/wolfman_update_from_comic_con/#comment-21629094</link><description>Sometime next February - I don't have the exact date at the moment.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 20:55:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Comic-Con &amp;#8216;08: Watchmen Panel</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/comic_con_821608_watchmen_panel/#comment-21629086</link><description>@Joe F&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thanks for the correction, bud. It's difficult to try and accurately type what is being said AS it's being said.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I've changed the post accordingly.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 17:24:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Comic-Con &amp;#8216;08: Watchmen Panel</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/comic_con_821608_watchmen_panel/#comment-21629084</link><description>The clip we saw was much more graphic than what's shown in the trailer. Also, the scene where Billy Crudup is turned into Dr. Manhattan and he vaporizes actually showed him disintegrating in much more detail as his skin, then organs explode away from his body finally leaving his skeleton.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 16:02:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Comic-Con &amp;#8216;08: Red Sonja Panel</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/comic_con_821608_red_sonja_panel/#comment-21629068</link><description>@angela&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Yeah, that poster didn't do much for me. Kind of a creepy porn movie vibe.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2008 15:30:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Comic-Con &amp;#8216;08: Red Sonja Panel</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/comic_con_821608_red_sonja_panel/#comment-21629064</link><description>@Liz Gotta say I agree with you - that poster doesn't set well with me at all. Kind of gross/creepy, really.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 26 Jul 2008 05:38:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A Bunch Of Comic-Con Pictures For Ya</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/a_bunch_of_comic_con_pictures_for_ya/#comment-21629049</link><description>Keep in mind that Alex (in the incident you're referring to) can be a bit over-dramatic in his description of events. :-) &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 11:49:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Comic-Con ‘08: Summit Panel &amp;#8211; Twilight</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/comic_con_08_summit_panel_8211_twilight/#comment-21629032</link><description>@Melissa I didn't think the panel was "high" but a couple of the male leads were definitely working the crowd. Can't say I blame them, I suppose. :-P&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And not being familiar with the actor who made the "void" quote, I couldn't tell if he was kidding or not. Knowing the sort of folks that are in the industry it wouldn't have surprised me if he was serious, but I'll take your word for it that he wasn't.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Best,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 17:14:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Comic-Con ‘08: Summit Panel &amp;#8211; Twilight</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/comic_con_08_summit_panel_8211_twilight/#comment-21629022</link><description>Amy, I understand what you're saying, it was just an odd experience to have at Comic-Con. I've gotten fired up like that about other movies, albeit not in quite the same manner. :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 26 Jul 2008 04:51:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Comic-Con ‘08: Summit Panel &amp;#8211; Twilight</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/comic_con_08_summit_panel_8211_twilight/#comment-21629014</link><description>Ladies, I really appreciate your comments and I realize this is your first time here at Screen Rant, but being "snarky" is my writing style here on the site. Your take away should be how the movie scenes and panel came across to a "regular person" who is not familiar with the material.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Best,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 11:47:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Comic-Con ‘08: Summit Panel &amp;#8211; Twilight</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/comic_con_08_summit_panel_8211_twilight/#comment-21629001</link><description>@susan Trust me, the audience was full of young women and they went bonkers over it.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;@Dee LOL, it's a fantasy film and that's the type of movie I cover here on Screen Rant. And I didn't do this post for myself.... I did it for YOU. So, you're welcome. :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 20:57:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Comic-Con ‘08: Summit Panel &amp;#8211; Twilight</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/comic_con_08_summit_panel_8211_twilight/#comment-21628995</link><description>@Faith LOL, you're probably right, just because it's going to be so massively popular, I'll have to review it. :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 20:03:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Comic-Con ‘08: Summit Panel &amp;#8211; Twilight</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/comic_con_08_summit_panel_8211_twilight/#comment-21628992</link><description>Hanako,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;My apologies, I'll correct that. I'm not familiar with the book and I was blogging this panel live.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 19:27:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Comic-Con &amp;#8216;08: Fox Panel</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/comic_con_821608_fox_panel/#comment-21628980</link><description>Ok, you know what? Whatever. I'm trying to be civil but I'm done responding to you.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 16:22:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Comic-Con &amp;#8216;08: Fox Panel</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/comic_con_821608_fox_panel/#comment-21628978</link><description>Oh, and by the way, if you were here you'd have seen that Keanu was quite deadpan in his comments, and that's why I just wrote that "he said."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It's not a bad thing, but he wasn't "charming," nor did he engage the audience. That's just the fact of the matter.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Best regards,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 14:20:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Comic-Con &amp;#8216;08: Fox Panel</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/comic_con_821608_fox_panel/#comment-21628977</link><description>@ckage LOL, dude, did you miss the "without the sugar coating" bit? I call it like I see it. If you want straight up news without an editorial angle, I suggest you head over to &lt;a href="http://ComingSoon.net" rel="nofollow"&gt;ComingSoon.net&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Feel free to disagree, in fact I encourage polite debate on the site. But just as I have an issue with TDTESS (and don't mistake my opinion of the film with my opinion of Reeves, which are two separate things) you seem to have an issue with Wahlberg and Jackman.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;So perhaps you might consider that this is a case of the pot calling the kettle black.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 14:11:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Comic-Con &amp;#8216;08: Fox Panel</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/comic_con_821608_fox_panel/#comment-21628975</link><description>@ckage Did I ever say I was "unbiased?" This is an opinion site - of COURSE I'm biased. :-P&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 11:44:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Avengers Cast &amp;#8220;Confirmed,&amp;#8221; Iron Man 2 to Intro New Avenger</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/avengers_cast_8220confirmed8221_iron_man_2_to_intro_new_avenger/#comment-21628941</link><description>@Huntthejest&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Wow, GREAT pick! I think Dwayne Johnson would make a great Wonder Man with the whole celebrity personality angle.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 10:28:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Avengers Cast &amp;#8220;Confirmed,&amp;#8221; Iron Man 2 to Intro New Avenger</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/avengers_cast_8220confirmed8221_iron_man_2_to_intro_new_avenger/#comment-21628933</link><description>@The Hunter&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Dude, you crack me up. :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 15:50:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Avengers Cast &amp;#8220;Confirmed,&amp;#8221; Iron Man 2 to Intro New Avenger</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/avengers_cast_8220confirmed8221_iron_man_2_to_intro_new_avenger/#comment-21628921</link><description>Hey green, I had the same thought.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 16:13:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 2008 Comic-Con Day 1:Crowds And More Crowds</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/2008_comic_con_day_1crowds_and_more_crowds/#comment-21628914</link><description>@Brooster We'll see if anything comes out on the film over the next few days. I don't think I saw anything in the schedule though...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 11:38:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Dark Knight: Failed Predictions And Monster Box Office</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/the_dark_knight_failed_predictions_and_monster_box_office/#comment-21628899</link><description>@ZAR Easy boy - I was on the fence regarding whether or not to delete your post.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 11:36:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Discussion &amp;#8211; July 23, 2008</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/open_discussion_8211_july_23_2008/#comment-21628878</link><description>Yeah, 790 is a very good artist - sent me a cool rendition of the Terminator. :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 14:01:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Discussion &amp;#8211; July 23, 2008</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/open_discussion_8211_july_23_2008/#comment-21628856</link><description>You guys can get more more timely updates on my Comic-Con adventure by following me at &lt;a href="http://twitter.com/screenrant" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://twitter.com/screenrant&lt;/a&gt; .&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 17:30:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Where&amp;#8217;s Harry Potter?</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/where8217s_harry_potter/#comment-21628829</link><description>Elaine,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thanks, missed that one. Haven't really covered it here much - guess I need to. :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 11:39:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Tom Cruise To Return To Top Gun 2?</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/tom_cruise_to_return_to_top_gun_2/#comment-21628779</link><description>@nowhereman - Hey, bro, what's the deal with the email addresses you use? I keep getting bounce messages in my inbox and I *hate* getting repeated bounce messages.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 15:43:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Hi-Res Image Of Zachary Quinto As Spock</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/hi_res_image_of_zachary_quinto_as_spock/#comment-21628770</link><description>@Jay Spock won't have "scruff" I had to find another pic of Quinto to fill in the chin area and that had the scruff.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 22:26:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Hi-Res Image Of Zachary Quinto As Spock</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/hi_res_image_of_zachary_quinto_as_spock/#comment-21628765</link><description>OK, I've toned down the green. Hit Ctrl-F5 to see the updated images.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 18:37:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Hi-Res Image Of Zachary Quinto As Spock</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/hi_res_image_of_zachary_quinto_as_spock/#comment-21628764</link><description>Yeah, I think I was influenced a little too much by the poster. :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 17:34:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Hi-Res Image Of Zachary Quinto As Spock</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/hi_res_image_of_zachary_quinto_as_spock/#comment-21628759</link><description>Antonio,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;LOL, thanks. I actually found another image of Quinto from the front and scaled it to fit the size of his face from the Star Trek poster, so it's his chin. :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 15:45:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Dark Knight Burns Up First-Day Box Office Records</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/the_dark_knight_burns_up_first_day_box_office_records/#comment-21628718</link><description>Even inflation-adjusted, TDK now holds the record for opening weekend box office, but yeah, I hear what you're saying. Of course the number of screens on which a film premieres should also be a factor.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If you want to see an inflation adjusted list of all time biggest box office earners go here:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.boxofficemojo.com/alltime/adjusted.htm" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.boxofficemojo.com/alltime/adjusted.htm&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The majority of films in the top ten might surprise you. :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 10:35:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: YouTube Partners With TiVo</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/youtube_partners_with_tivo/#comment-21628699</link><description>DVR capability on a satellite box adds about $5/month to your bill and once you use it you'll never go back.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 22:25:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Behold&amp;#8230;The New Star Trek Poster</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/behold8230the_new_star_trek_poster/#comment-21628678</link><description>TOS stands alone!!! :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And yeah, one of the most overused phrases starting with Next Generation was "temporal anomaly" followed closely by "spatial anomaly." :-P&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 19 Jul 2008 16:06:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Behold&amp;#8230;The New Star Trek Poster</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/behold8230the_new_star_trek_poster/#comment-21628645</link><description>I like it - looks like it calls back to the 1960s style in terms of color and layout, paying homage to the original show.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 12:12:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Dark Knight IMAX Review</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/the_dark_knight_imax_review/#comment-21628620</link><description>Ok, boys, settle down. Don't make me separate you two.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;We like to keep Screen Rant a friendly place.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 18:40:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Dark Knight IMAX Review</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/the_dark_knight_imax_review/#comment-21628609</link><description>Actually I spoke with my sister over the weekend who is far more versed in the technical aspects of filmmaking than I am and one of her beefs with the movie was the fact that Batman was a secondary character in the film as compared to the Joker.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;She said she LOVED Heath as the Joker, but a film should be about the hero, not the villain.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2008 10:09:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Dark Knight IMAX Review</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/the_dark_knight_imax_review/#comment-21628599</link><description>@Last Laugh&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thanks, we work hard around here to encourage intelligent discussion and keep out the trolls.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2008 22:31:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Dark Knight IMAX Review</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/the_dark_knight_imax_review/#comment-21628591</link><description>@790&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I agree with the others about Harvey Dent's integrity remaining intact, if somewhat warped. That's why he didn't kill the Joker.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And you're rememberin the car scene wrong: Dent BUCKLED his seat belt right before the car flipped.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 00:28:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Dark Knight IMAX Review</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/the_dark_knight_imax_review/#comment-21628582</link><description>@790 Great points, bud. There was nothing huge that knocked down my score but as you say, it wasn't perfect as some people are claiming. Enough for me to knock a 1/2 star from a perfect rating.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Although I don't feel as strongly about the Two-Face hospital scene as you do, when the flaming vehicle diverted them into the underground area that seemed pretty dumb to me as well. They could have sent a cop car ahead to clear the next intersection so they could stay on the surface.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 02:06:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Robert Downey Jr. Talks Up Iron Man 2; Talks Down Dark Knight</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/robert_downey_jr_talks_up_iron_man_2_talks_down_dark_knight/#comment-21631106</link><description>I'll bet you dollars to donuts that Downey laughed after he said that (meant it as a joke), and it didn't come across in the original interview.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2008 18:46:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Babylon A.D. Poster, Images, Clips And Trailer Round-Up</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/babylon_ad_poster_images_clips_and_trailer_round_up/#comment-21631085</link><description>@Joshua&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It's a problem on your end, bro. I just checked in both Firefox and Internet Explorer and everything is fine in both for me.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2008 13:56:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Babylon A.D. Poster, Images, Clips And Trailer Round-Up</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/babylon_ad_poster_images_clips_and_trailer_round_up/#comment-21631083</link><description>@Reverend&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I said:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;em&gt;"Looks to me like the sort of role that Diesel was born to play."&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I didn't say it was THE role he was born to play. :-P&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2008 12:37:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Discussion &amp;#8211; August 13, 2008</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/open_discussion_8211_august_13_2008/#comment-21631068</link><description>@almanza There is no officially released trailer for &lt;a href="http://screenrant.com/tag/wolverine/" rel="nofollow"&gt;Wolverine&lt;/a&gt; yet. There was footage shown at Comic-Con which I talked about in my &lt;a href="http://screenrant.com/comiccon-08-fox-panel-vic-3071/" rel="nofollow"&gt;Fox Panel post&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I don't publish bootleg YouTube trailers here on Screen Rant, but you can be sure that as soon as it's officially released you'll see it here. :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2008 09:06:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Discussion &amp;#8211; August 13, 2008</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/open_discussion_8211_august_13_2008/#comment-21631067</link><description>&lt;em&gt;Posted from Screen Rant Mobile, using MoFuse.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Hey 790, did you add that or was that inserted into your comment automatically?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2008 08:58:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: If Joss Whedon Had Done Batman</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/if_joss_whedon_had_done_batman/#comment-21631051</link><description>@Pete&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Keep in mind that the director of "Alien 4" changed Whedon's script DRASTICALLY. What we saw in the final movie was not Whedon's vision.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;We had the briefest glimpse of Whedon's script in the coolest scene in the entire film: Ripley taking on the bunch of macho dudes at basketball and kicking their butts.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;That final nose wipe where she flicked blood off her finger and it sizzled when it hit the deck... SWEET!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Rest of the movie, not so much.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2008 01:06:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: First Pic Of Jake Gyllenhaal From Prince Of Persia</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/first_pic_of_jake_gyllenhaal_from_prince_of_persia/#comment-21631010</link><description>@Roberts&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;What are you talking about? Anyone who has something to contribute to the conversation is welcome as long as they are civil. You are a newbie here yourself.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 00:00:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: First Pic Of Jake Gyllenhaal From Prince Of Persia</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/first_pic_of_jake_gyllenhaal_from_prince_of_persia/#comment-21630981</link><description>Gotta admit he does look pretty good despite all the naysayers. What I find funny is that prior to this image I always thought of him as kind of a pasty white guy - so it took a hell of a casting director to make THAT leap, lol. :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 16 Aug 2008 00:22:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: First Pic Of Jake Gyllenhaal From Prince Of Persia</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/first_pic_of_jake_gyllenhaal_from_prince_of_persia/#comment-21630978</link><description>@Sean&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;FIRST of all you need to chill out and not call people morons.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The person "who wrote this article" said NOTHING about Naveen Andrews whatsoever. That was one of the commenters.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And as far as pale vs tan, whatever is true historically, today most people associate a tan look with those who come from that part of the world.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Also, this film is based on the video game and the character in that game does not exactly have snowy white skin.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2008 16:50:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: First Pic Of Jake Gyllenhaal From Prince Of Persia</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/first_pic_of_jake_gyllenhaal_from_prince_of_persia/#comment-21630969</link><description>Yeah, I don't get why they didn't go with an actor from that part of the world (beyond the obvious of course - star power).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2008 01:09:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Journeyman: Here&amp;#8217;s How It Would Have Ended</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/journeyman_here8217s_how_it_would_have_ended/#comment-21630942</link><description>Hey guys, maybe the discussion about "24" could be moved over to this week's &lt;a href="http://screenrant.com/open-discussion-august-13-2008-vic-3390/" rel="nofollow"&gt;open discussion post&lt;/a&gt;. :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2008 01:17:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Wall-E Review</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/wall_e_review/#comment-21627290</link><description>Yep, that's one of the things that make it difficult to run this site. There are things that I don't post up as far as video clips and such because I don't want to see them myself because it detracts from the movie experience.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 10:59:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Wall-E Review</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/wall_e_review/#comment-21627286</link><description>Jersey, I know EXACTLY what you mean. Now imagine the added pressure of watching it knowing you have to write a review for it. :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I actually think I may enjoy this more upon a second viewing (not that I didn't enjoy it the first time).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 00:25:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Wall-E Review</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/wall_e_review/#comment-21627273</link><description>Jersey, the spam filter is getting overzealous. It's an external app so I don't have as much control over it as I'd like.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Anytime you submit a post and it doesn't show up, rest assured it's in the system somewhere - it's either flagged for moderation or is caught as a false positive for spam.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 10:51:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Wall-E Review</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/wall_e_review/#comment-21627253</link><description>Man I hate when I let myself be dragged off topic, but you are so off base it's not even funny. School food is JUNK. Mac and cheese, burgers and fries, etc. plus junk food and soda machines everywhere. It's only recently that trend has started to be reversed.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I don't police anyone but when it starts affecting me directly I get my back up. If I buy a ticket for a flight and I have to lean sideways in a seat for 5 hours because the guy next to me takes up a seat and a half or two, that affects me directly. When they have to start redesigning ambulances to accomodate people who otherwise wouldn't fit in a standard ambulance that's not a good thing.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Hell, by your definition, being addicted to porn is just a natural extension of admiring a pretty girl who walks by on the street, and that's just "enjoying life." Someone being a heroin addict, although it might not affect me directly, is also just "enjoying life," right?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Anything taken to an extreme can be very bad.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I highly recommend you go rent Morgan Spurlock's documentary &lt;em&gt;Super Size Me&lt;/em&gt;.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;That's my final comment on the matter.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 19:20:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Wall-E Review</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/wall_e_review/#comment-21627251</link><description>"Enjoying life?" Uh, yeah, ok. I understand enjoying a fine meal or an awesome dessert once in a while, but that's a hell of a leap from pigging out constantly.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://images.google.com/images?q=obese+people" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://images.google.com/images?q=obese+people&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 18:57:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Wall-E Review</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/wall_e_review/#comment-21627248</link><description>Ah, thanks! I'm not a huge fan of musicals but I prefer the older ones with Fred Astaire and Gene Kelly.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 15:50:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Wall-E Review</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/wall_e_review/#comment-21627244</link><description>Funny story: I was out and about one day and a mom or dad (don't recall which) was holding what looked like a maybe a 6-8 month old in their arms. They gave them a taste of an ice cream cone and the look on the kids face was worthy of a youtube video. He got this look of wide-eyed shock on his face, and then he desperately tried to get his hands on the ice cream cone.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Looked like he just tried freaking heroine for the first time.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Don't. Give. Infants. Sweets.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 10:26:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Wall-E Review</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/wall_e_review/#comment-21627242</link><description>Hey Oscar,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Of course it's ok once in a while but notice I specified a particular age range. You don't give ice cream to a child that barely even knows how to walk yet. And do you know why? Because once they get a taste of concentrated sugar/high fructose corn syrup, good luck trying to get the them to eat anything healthy that doesn't have that intense taste.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;As far as soda, are you aware that one can of soda has 12 teaspoons of sugar? Can you imagine adding that much sugar to a cup of coffee? Now give that to a 3-4 year old and then in 30 minutes get mad at him because he's acting "hyper."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 09:42:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Wall-E Review</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/wall_e_review/#comment-21627239</link><description>Ok, I know I'm going to step in it here, but my issue with obesity is that it's incredibly unhealthy. Not only is this bad for the person, but instead of tackling the problem with proper nutrition and exercise the issue continues to get worse requiring medication and surgery for things like heart disease and diabetes.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;What does this do? It increases the cost of health care for me and my family even though we take care of ourselves. The diseases brought on by obesity are preventable.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And we have an epidemic of adult-onset diabetes in children in the U.S., which sickens me because it's TOTALLY preventable. When I see a parent giving a one year old an ice cream cone or giving a three year old a can of soda or a power drink, I want to walk up to that parent and slap them upside the head.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 18:36:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Wall-E Review</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/wall_e_review/#comment-21627232</link><description>I didn't feel I was talked down to... I just thought it was too "in your face."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 02:07:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Wall-E Review</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/wall_e_review/#comment-21627229</link><description>Gary, I think you just described Star Trek, lol.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 01:45:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Weekend Movie News Wrap Up: June 29, 2008</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/weekend_movie_news_wrap_up_june_29_2008/#comment-21627216</link><description>I'm a huge fan of the Bourne movie series - hopefully they do a good job with a new one. The problem with a new one might be the loss of his vulnerability (which made the character more approachable) if they decide to go all-out super-assassin.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;His reticence is what made him appealing as a character and is what was for the most part missing from "Wanted."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 29 Jun 2008 15:19:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Remake #899: Red Sonja</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/remake_899_red_sonja/#comment-21627212</link><description>Update for ya: The word is that Rodriguez and McGowan have split up, so we may end up with a different Red Sonja. :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 15:39:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Remake #899: Red Sonja</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/remake_899_red_sonja/#comment-21627209</link><description>Thanks for the clarification. :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;BTW, having read the post you linked to and the history of posts by this "Luke" character, I wouldn't call that any sort of serious announcement at all. That was smoke and mirrors, no actress named, no director, nothing. Hardly qualifies as a year old version of this post, bro.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Who is that Luke character anyway?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 18:54:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Remake #899: Red Sonja</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/remake_899_red_sonja/#comment-21627205</link><description>Oh really, Robert Rodriguez was attached to direct this and the fact that Rose McGowan was to play the lead was announced a year ago?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Pray tell, do provide us with a link.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 18:00:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Finally, Some New Star Trek News</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/finally_some_new_star_trek_news/#comment-21627139</link><description>Maybe I need to revisit that one. Haven't watched it since my initial viewing at the theater.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 18:24:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Finally, Some New Star Trek News</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/finally_some_new_star_trek_news/#comment-21627135</link><description>I'm a LOOOONG time Trek fan and my favorite series is TOS. Despite this, I've been cautiously optimistic regarding this film, perhaps because I feel that the previous folks in charge have driven it into the ground and murdered the franchise.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I'm willing to give this a chance, I just hope they don't screw it up.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 17:02:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Wanted Review</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/wanted_review/#comment-21627121</link><description>Check my Top 10 Summer Movies post.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 18:00:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Wanted Review</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/wanted_review/#comment-21627116</link><description>Alexius,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Yeah, I figured this was going to be a "love it or hate it" kind of movie.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 12 Jul 2008 13:58:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Wanted Review</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/wanted_review/#comment-21627102</link><description>First, I didn't go in expecting "Sense and Sensibility"... I made that clear in my review and in all my posts leading up to the review. It just didn't work for me and I can think of at least &lt;a href="http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/wanted/?critic=columns&amp;amp;sortby=rotten&amp;amp;name_order=asc&amp;amp;view=#mo" rel="nofollow"&gt;30+ reviewers on Rotten Tomatoes who agree with me&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Regarding comparisons between this and the Hulk, for example - in pretty much every superhero movie that is not blatantly science fiction (Hulk, Iron Man, Spider-Man, Superman, X-Men, etc.) the heroes themselves have special powers, but the laws of physics still apply for the most part.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;As far as I know, no one in "Wanted" had the ability to telekinetically cause a bullet to travel in a circular path within the confines of a small room and have the mass/momentum to not only do that but continue on through multiple human heads.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Best regards,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 28 Jun 2008 23:04:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Wanted Review</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/wanted_review/#comment-21627089</link><description>Jim,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;To each his own, bro. I don't understand how superpowers allow people to (literally) bend the laws of physics regarding the trajectory of bullets.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And someone made an excellent point above regarding the 100's of people that died during the train wreck - so much for "kill one, save a thousand."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Best,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 28 Jun 2008 17:44:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Wanted Review</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/wanted_review/#comment-21627085</link><description>Hey Rob, I'm curious to see Wall-E, haven't had a chance yet. In general critics are raving about it, but considering my personal point of view on things I'm curious how it will come across to me.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I'm sure we'll disagree on it. :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 28 Jun 2008 12:01:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Wanted Review</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/wanted_review/#comment-21627076</link><description>Rob,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Well, movies ARE subjective, lol. You probably will like Wanted, then. :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;As far as the crossbow/knife scene in Get Smart - that was the whole point of the scene.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;BTW, I upgraded my Hulk review.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 09:31:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Wanted Review</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/wanted_review/#comment-21627071</link><description>jersey, different marketing firms represent different studios and I haven't made contact with some of 'em yet. I don't know which firm handles Disney/Pixar screenings, but so far I'm pretty happy with the selection I've had. :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 01:27:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Wanted Review</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/wanted_review/#comment-21627066</link><description>Jersey, I'm going to have to go see it when it opens like the rest of you guys. I didn't get access to a pre-screening for Wall-E unforunately.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;So sometime this weekend.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 00:04:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Wanted Review</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/wanted_review/#comment-21627064</link><description>JimK, that may be so, but like the vast majority of people seeing this movie, I haven't read the book. If they were in fact superhuman it should have been emphasized more overtly in the film.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 23:44:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Discussion &amp;#8211; June 25, 2008</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/open_discussion_8211_june_25_2008/#comment-21626989</link><description>I emailed Green, for some reason his comments were caught by the spam filter.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Regarding Hancock, review will be up next Friday.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 28 Jun 2008 10:50:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Discussion &amp;#8211; June 25, 2008</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/open_discussion_8211_june_25_2008/#comment-21626983</link><description>Thanks, bud - I appreciate it.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 28 Jun 2008 09:58:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Discussion &amp;#8211; June 25, 2008</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/open_discussion_8211_june_25_2008/#comment-21626977</link><description>Rob,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Sorry about that bud. I discovered that if you click on the page anywhere off the ad it closes it.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;On a side note: I just got back from "Hancock" and to my surprise I thought it was GREAT. Only comment I have is that it most definitely should have been rated R.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 00:42:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Discussion &amp;#8211; June 25, 2008</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/open_discussion_8211_june_25_2008/#comment-21626974</link><description>Braveheart,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;First, you don't have to type in ALL CAPS to get my attention or express your opinion.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Second, believe me I've been considering doing just what you suggest and bumping it up to a 4/5. Not that I think 3.5/5 is so terrible.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 18:36:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Discussion &amp;#8211; June 25, 2008</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/open_discussion_8211_june_25_2008/#comment-21626968</link><description>I Tivo'd "Wipeout" but haven't watched it yet. Looks like it was drawn directly from G4's "Ninja Warrior" (which is an AWESOME show).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Curious to see how it stacks up. If you haven't seen NW on G4 I highly recommend it.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 10:28:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Which Heroes Will Marvel Recruit For The Avengers?</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/which_heroes_will_marvel_recruit_for_the_avengers/#comment-21626948</link><description>@JY Um, Chuck Norris may be in decent shape, but the man's 68 years old. I'm sorry but that's too old IMHO.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 14:37:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Which Heroes Will Marvel Recruit For The Avengers?</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/which_heroes_will_marvel_recruit_for_the_avengers/#comment-21626944</link><description>Sorry, I have no idea.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 17:09:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Which Heroes Will Marvel Recruit For The Avengers?</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/which_heroes_will_marvel_recruit_for_the_avengers/#comment-21626889</link><description>No harm no foul, bro.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 15:29:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Which Heroes Will Marvel Recruit For The Avengers?</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/which_heroes_will_marvel_recruit_for_the_avengers/#comment-21626885</link><description>Ok, green, if you want to chime in again that's fine but I'm done. :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;G.K., I think that for the film they'll reach back to an earlier version of the character, before all this "wife-beater" stuff was introduced to the story. I believe that if they managed to make him heroic and part of the team in the comics they certainly ought to be able to in an Avengers movie. And don't forget they'll be doing a standalone Ant-Man movie before the Avengers.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 22:32:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Which Heroes Will Marvel Recruit For The Avengers?</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/which_heroes_will_marvel_recruit_for_the_avengers/#comment-21626880</link><description>The founding fathers view on the right to bear arms was so the citizens could protect themselves from and abusive government. Your "England invasion" example is specious. I find it incredibly ironic that you keep bringing up "V for Vendetta" when that is EXACTLY the reason the founding fathers were so strong about our right to own guns. To protect ourselves from an abusive government, should that ever come to pass. Nevermind the concept of personal protection, as in Australia where all law-abiding gun owners were required to give up their guns and the violent crime rate and burglaries then skyrocketed.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I also find it ironic to hear you say that something "written 400 years ago" has no bearing today, especially in view of the fact that you are a Christian. I'm pretty sure the Bible was written over 400 years ago. :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And I'll tell you what: If someone raped my daughter you'd be hard pressed to keep me from killing him with my bare hands.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;There's no point in any further debate when our viewpoints are so diametrically opposed and I've helped hijack this thread enough.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Respectfully,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 21:43:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Which Heroes Will Marvel Recruit For The Avengers?</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/which_heroes_will_marvel_recruit_for_the_avengers/#comment-21626878</link><description>You miss the point of my statement. I don't expect starving people to overthrow a dictator, but I also will not take on guilt for what that dictator is doing.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And talking about the government, if the Supreme Court was populated with one more liberal, our right to bear arms would have gone down the toilet today.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I don't want to get any deeper off topic here, but I have to say that I have very little respect for the politics of the Left - those on the bench voted against our right to defend ourselves today, and on the flip side only a couple of days ago made it illegal to execute men who rape young children. AND those same people who vote against our right to bear arms and think that child rape is not a heinous enough crime to warrant execution, uphold the rights of pornographers under the guise of "free speech."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I find that dichotomy repugnant.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 20:51:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Which Heroes Will Marvel Recruit For The Avengers?</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/which_heroes_will_marvel_recruit_for_the_avengers/#comment-21626874</link><description>You know... why don't people lay blame at the feet of the governments of the impoverished countries? Why should I feel guilty if I work hard and apply myself enough to have a nice house and a big screen TV, and the guy across the street lays on his couch all day drinking beer complaining his house isn't as nice as mine?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Many of the governments of impoverished countries are dispicable, taking advantage of their people, building palaces while they starve, etc.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I believe in helping those who CAN'T help themselves, not in helping those who WON'T.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 19:04:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Which Heroes Will Marvel Recruit For The Avengers?</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/which_heroes_will_marvel_recruit_for_the_avengers/#comment-21626847</link><description>Sean,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Great point! Perhaps that's a tribute to the director's skills?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 10:26:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Brandon Routh Speaks On Superman: Man Of Steel</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/brandon_routh_speaks_on_superman_man_of_steel/#comment-21626830</link><description>Weirdest comment, ever. Almost.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2009 21:12:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Brandon Routh Speaks On Superman: Man Of Steel</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/brandon_routh_speaks_on_superman_man_of_steel/#comment-21626809</link><description>@Paymon Those are some of the reasons I really wasn't a fan of SR.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 17:38:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Brandon Routh Speaks On Superman: Man Of Steel</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/brandon_routh_speaks_on_superman_man_of_steel/#comment-21626780</link><description>Kel, I found your comment, bro.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;For some reason the spam filter keeps catching your long diatribes. I'll keep teaching it that "Kel is good." :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Sorry about that.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 15:27:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Brandon Routh Speaks On Superman: Man Of Steel</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/brandon_routh_speaks_on_superman_man_of_steel/#comment-21626770</link><description>Kane the average rating for "Superman Returns" is about 3.5/5. That's good, but not great.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 10:25:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Will There Be A Remake Of An American Werewolf In London?</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/will_there_be_a_remake_of_an_american_werewolf_in_london/#comment-21626742</link><description>I do believe Niall may have floated that idea... :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 23:52:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Ant-Man To Be Funny, But Not THAT Funny</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/ant_man_to_be_funny_but_not_that_funny/#comment-21626735</link><description>Yeah, before they started injecting all that "reality" into comics.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 20:53:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Ant-Man To Be Funny, But Not THAT Funny</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/ant_man_to_be_funny_but_not_that_funny/#comment-21626730</link><description>Aw hell, did I totally screw up on that? Yeesh. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 13:32:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: We Don&amp;#8217;t Have The Day The Earth Stood Still Poster</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/we_don8217t_have_the_day_the_earth_stood_still_poster/#comment-21626724</link><description>Oh, and they're completely twisting the story from one where the alien race sends an emissary to Earth because they're concerned we'll take our penchant for killing each other out into space with a concern that we'll go out and pollute other planets.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Give me a break.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 23:34:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: We Don&amp;#8217;t Have The Day The Earth Stood Still Poster</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/we_don8217t_have_the_day_the_earth_stood_still_poster/#comment-21626723</link><description>Sam,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Are you trying to piss me off? If I said I received a notice, I received a notice. I quoted the email I received in the previous post. Maybe they went after a small site because they figure I don't have lawyers to back me up.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Feel free to leave and never return if you like. I don't take kindly to little trolls like you calling me a liar.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 23:32:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Angels and Demons Banned By The Vatican</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/angels_and_demons_banned_by_the_vatican/#comment-21626255</link><description>Personally I can't say I blame the Vatican on this one. They have the right to say what can and cannot happen on their property.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If someone was going to make a movie about my family and call us a bunch liars and conspirators, then asked me if they could shoot the film in my home, I'd tell them to get lost as well.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2008 14:44:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: New Two-Face Clip From The Dark Knight</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/new_two_face_clip_from_the_dark_knight/#comment-21626252</link><description>Geez, any of you guys who use Internet Explorer couldn't let me know the formatting on the trailer was honked up and pushed over to the side?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I use Firefox so I didn't know until I happened to check it...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2008 21:44:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: New Two-Face Clip From The Dark Knight</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/new_two_face_clip_from_the_dark_knight/#comment-21626242</link><description>The problem with the Iron Man campaign was that it told pretty much the entire plot of the movie. It also showed bits from every single action sequence in the film which left no surprises.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The thing I like about TDK's campaign is despite all the footage we've seen (granted, not as much as with IM) we still don't really have a concrete idea of the overall arc of the story, nevermind the details.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2008 03:31:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Updated: Special Effects Master Stan Winston Has Died</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/updated_special_effects_master_stan_winston_has_died/#comment-21626238</link><description>Jae,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Yeah, but remember it's Stan Winston &lt;em&gt;Studios&lt;/em&gt;, he didn't run a one man show. I know he has tons of talented artists there.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 10:25:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Update On Joss Whedon&amp;#8217;s Dollhouse</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/update_on_joss_whedon8217s_dollhouse/#comment-21626167</link><description>@natalie&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Whedon is well known for creating strong female protagonists. I would have loved to have seen him take on the Wonder Woman movie!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2008 11:39:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Update On Joss Whedon&amp;#8217;s Dollhouse</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/update_on_joss_whedon8217s_dollhouse/#comment-21626154</link><description>Hey greenknight, for some reason your last couple of comments have been double posted... anything on your end because the site seems fine to me.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Regarding Whedon, I never got into Buffy but I'm a HUGE fan of Firefly/Serenity. Just love the tone, concept and the writing.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 15 Jun 2008 14:01:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Dark Knight Is 2 1/2 Hours Long?</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/the_dark_knight_is_2_12_hours_long/#comment-21626132</link><description>Steven, yeah, that's my point. I'm a huge fan of the "Lord of the Rings" movies, but on the other hand some movies that are under two hours still "feel" too long.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 14 Jun 2008 15:32:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Death Race Trailer: Jason Statham Profiles &amp;amp; Exploding Cars</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/death_race_trailer_jason_statham_profiles_amp_exploding_cars/#comment-21626111</link><description>Um, why are you comparing a R-rated, violent action movie about prisoners trying to kill each other to the PG-rated, cotton candy movie that was Speed Racer?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Just curious.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2008 23:01:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Battlestar Galactica Final Season Split In Two</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/battlestar_galactica_final_season_split_in_two/#comment-21626057</link><description>This is a ridiculous trend - first "Lost" with almost a full year between seasons and now this, which is even dumber.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Maybe in a couple of years we can have "micro-seasons" lasting 5 episodes and we can watch a story line evolve from the time our children enter kindergarten until the day they graduate college.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2008 18:03:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Title Logos For Upcoming Marvel Movies</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/title_logos_for_upcoming_marvel_movies/#comment-21626055</link><description>@Big Les&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Haven't heard anything new on Luke Cage in quite a while.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 16:21:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Title Logos For Upcoming Marvel Movies</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/title_logos_for_upcoming_marvel_movies/#comment-21626053</link><description>Nick appeared in a very cool scene at the end of the credits.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Studios have more than one movie in development at the same time all the time. As long as they give a couple of months between release dates so one movie doesn't step on the toes of the other one it's fine.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I hear the ending of Captain America will be a cliffhanger leading directly to the opening of Avengers, but good point on whoever plays the role filming two movies at once.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Characters are not established for the Avengers movie yet.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 10:14:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Title Logos For Upcoming Marvel Movies</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/title_logos_for_upcoming_marvel_movies/#comment-21626050</link><description>Snikt, geez... ya know, I've been so focused on this year's movies that I guess I'd better get up to speed on what's coming out next year. Of course I'm sure I'll be fully briefed at the San Diego Comic-Con next month. :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 15 Jun 2008 22:21:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Harry Potter Trailer</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/harry_potter_trailer/#comment-21629424</link><description>@JBRREX Thanks and welcome to the site!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 20:56:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Harry Potter Trailer</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/harry_potter_trailer/#comment-21629419</link><description>If what you're saying about the book progression is true that's a very interesting model that I don't think has been done before.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 14:39:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Harry Potter Trailer</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/harry_potter_trailer/#comment-21629413</link><description>Hey guys,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Yeah, I've only read the first one so you're right, I can't speak to the reading level of the others in the series. If they do in fact "mature" that's unusual as usually a writer's style is the same from book to book.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And for the record, I never said the MOVIES were childish - quite the opposite in fact.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 13:28:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Universal Is Inglorious</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/universal_is_inglorious/#comment-21629402</link><description>Hey Liz, I apologize for your comments continually getting caught in the spam filter. I've contacted the appropriate folks to try to remedy that.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;As far as this movie is concerned - I shudder to think what a Tarantino-directed WWII movie might be like...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 01:50:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Smallville Season 8: Less Krypton, More Superman</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/smallville_season_8_less_krypton_more_superman/#comment-21629372</link><description>@Scottgia3&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Nope, I haven't, sorry. Actually I try to keep myself as spoiler-free as possible so I can enjoy the episodes too! :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2009 18:06:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Smallville Season 8: Less Krypton, More Superman</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/smallville_season_8_less_krypton_more_superman/#comment-21629370</link><description>No one is producing anything behind anyone's back, bro.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2009 14:38:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Smallville Season 8: Less Krypton, More Superman</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/smallville_season_8_less_krypton_more_superman/#comment-21629359</link><description>Gotta say giving Lana powers was a pretty "jump the shark" event for me. And that water tank scene at the start of the episode reminded me of the Wolverine trailer.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 10:59:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Smallville Season 8: Less Krypton, More Superman</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/smallville_season_8_less_krypton_more_superman/#comment-21629339</link><description>@Otho&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I'd say the new producers are doing a pretty nice job this year. It kind of reminds me of "Star Trek: Enterprise" where they brought in Manny Coto to run the show in its last season. It got a LOT better but it was too late by then.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I'm starting to wonder if they will go further than this season after all.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 10:38:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Smallville Season 8: Less Krypton, More Superman</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/smallville_season_8_less_krypton_more_superman/#comment-21629331</link><description>Clark + glasses = Superman can NOT work in the established Smallville universe.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I'm VERY curious to see just how they intended on tackling the dual-identity thing this season...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2008 10:28:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Smallville Season 8: Less Krypton, More Superman</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/smallville_season_8_less_krypton_more_superman/#comment-21629326</link><description>@Austin&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Ya know... considering your spelling errors and lack of the use of paragraphs I don't think you're in a position to correct other people's comments.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 13 Sep 2008 17:23:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Smallville Season 8: Less Krypton, More Superman</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/smallville_season_8_less_krypton_more_superman/#comment-21629312</link><description>@scottgia&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I've mentioned before that I have no idea how they're going to write their way out of this considering the universe they've established.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;They probably will need to do something like what you suggested, but I think it would be pretty lame.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2008 16:39:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Smallville Season 8: Less Krypton, More Superman</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/smallville_season_8_less_krypton_more_superman/#comment-21629310</link><description>That would be the biggest cop-out ever. Well maybe not the biggest... it's hard to top the entire season of Dallas that writers ended up saying was a dream.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2008 15:29:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Smallville Season 8: Less Krypton, More Superman</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/smallville_season_8_less_krypton_more_superman/#comment-21629302</link><description>EXACTLY my point. I don't see any way they'll be able to incorporate the classic dual persona into the show. Hell, in the world they've created the only way I could see it working is if he wore a mask as Superman!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 15:14:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Smallville Season 8: Less Krypton, More Superman</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/smallville_season_8_less_krypton_more_superman/#comment-21629300</link><description>I'm actually wondering how the heck they're going to pull off the dual identity thing within the universe they've created on "Smallville."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I think they've REALLY written themselves into a corner regarding that and I'm betting their solution will be less than satisfactory.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 14:38:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Smallville Season 8: Less Krypton, More Superman</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/smallville_season_8_less_krypton_more_superman/#comment-21629298</link><description>We touched on the Doomsday issue in another post here on the site. And no, I don't think it's a good idea.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 13:26:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Common Sense Prevails: Robocop To Be Rated R</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/common_sense_prevails_robocop_to_be_rated_r/#comment-21629295</link><description>@Jody&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;No idea, although it would be cool if they at least gave him a cameo.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2009 10:39:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Common Sense Prevails: Robocop To Be Rated R</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/common_sense_prevails_robocop_to_be_rated_r/#comment-21629292</link><description>@voltage&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Nope, not much movement on this.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2008 22:44:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: First Trailer: The Day The Earth Stood Still</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/first_trailer_the_day_the_earth_stood_still/#comment-21627726</link><description>&lt;em&gt;"If you liked 300..that film was probably funded in part by the US government as propaganda for the wars in the Middle East"&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Ok, dude... you JUST jumped the Shark. Are you kidding me? So the original author of "300" in comic book form was in league with the government?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I thought we only had one conspiracy theorist here on the site. ;-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 06 Jul 2008 13:10:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: First Trailer: The Day The Earth Stood Still</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/first_trailer_the_day_the_earth_stood_still/#comment-21627709</link><description>Hey green, we may not be as far apart as you think. Just because I think the theory of man-made global warming is bunk doesn't mean I want to see rivers polluted and that I want to breath smog-laden air. :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;We should be responsible, but in a non-hysterical way.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;P.S. And Heath, we've all seen what awesome hits all those (anti)Iraq war movies have been at the box office, eh?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2008 23:42:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: First Trailer: The Day The Earth Stood Still</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/first_trailer_the_day_the_earth_stood_still/#comment-21627702</link><description>Hey guys, sorry about the comment issues. Since the existing filter was flagging "real" comments as spam I tried something else, but that seemed to have its own set of issues.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;So... we're back to the previous solution.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Green, no worries dude, have at it - even if I think you're wrong. :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Once again I think you've got it backwards: the media is pounding the global warming message into us based on questionable science by scientists looking for big juicy research grants.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;One volcano eruption puts out more atmosphere-unfriendly stuff than everything the U.S. pumps out of cars and factories in a year.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;First Arafat gets a Nobel price, and now Gore. Guess THAT organization has jumped the shark...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2008 22:44:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: More Hollywood Brilliance: Will Smith Was Offered Superman</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/more_hollywood_brilliance_will_smith_was_offered_superman/#comment-21627685</link><description>Carter,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I'm with you, bud. I would LOVE to see someone cast that fits the look as Alex Ross depicts Superman.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 12 Jul 2008 13:59:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: More Hollywood Brilliance: Will Smith Was Offered Superman</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/more_hollywood_brilliance_will_smith_was_offered_superman/#comment-21627679</link><description>"Superman Returns is a beautiful film."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Uh, nothing personal, but if I want to see "a beautiful film" I'll let my wife drag me to some Victorian era chick-flick.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 00:27:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: More Hollywood Brilliance: Will Smith Was Offered Superman</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/more_hollywood_brilliance_will_smith_was_offered_superman/#comment-21627674</link><description>Green,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I had that same comic book! Very cool. :-) Can't remember how it was that Superman didn't pummel Ali, lol. No powers, maybe.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 06 Jul 2008 13:08:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: More Hollywood Brilliance: Will Smith Was Offered Superman</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/more_hollywood_brilliance_will_smith_was_offered_superman/#comment-21627659</link><description>&lt;em&gt;"I mean seriously, who is really waiting for Superman: Man of Steel?"&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Not me.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2008 16:37:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Hancock Has Early Weekend Box Office Momentum</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/hancock_has_early_weekend_box_office_momentum/#comment-21627654</link><description>I'm curious to see how it does next weekend. I'm curious how word of mouth will affect second weekend box office.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;A while back I predicted a significant drop off due to misleading advertising which painted the movie as a typical Will Smith vehicle instead of the dark story that it delivers.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2008 17:02:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Hancock Has Early Weekend Box Office Momentum</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/hancock_has_early_weekend_box_office_momentum/#comment-21627649</link><description>The average rating at &lt;a href="http://RottenTomatoes.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;RottenTomatoes.com&lt;/a&gt; is 2.5/5.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vic</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScreenRant.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2008 14:46:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Smallville Season 8 Plot Points</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/smallvil