<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for Ted</title><link>http://disqus.com/people/6a6285f5e58b1e5676624b632ff8ed5d/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 21:47:16 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Tough Times Ahead For The Web?</title><link>http://avc.disqus.com/tough_times_ahead_for_the_web/#comment-2887</link><description>Part of the problem is undoubtedly people who are in the game for short term profit and not for creating long term value. This has always been the way of things... Fred, are you part of the problem, or part of the solution? This is something we can all ask ourselves.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ted</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2007 19:13:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: iLike and Facebook joined at the hip</title><link>http://mathewingram.disqus.com/ilike_and_facebook_joined_at_the_hip/#comment-1314547</link><description>How do they make money-- either through facebook or not?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ted</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 08 Jun 2007 13:46:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Glam roars, sparking battle of the hot women sites</title><link>http://venturebeat.disqus.com/glam_roars_sparking_battle_of_the_hot_women_sites/#comment-14676276</link><description>Yes, I have agree with Advertiser above. I can't help but thing web sites covering Silicon Valley are getting spun by GLAM which is very savvy about how to get press. Their huge traffic numbers are approved by placing advertorial on thousands of blog sites which are of questionable quality. Furthermore, the advertorial, while clearly GLAM branded is not necessarily engaging or even being read by the user of that page. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;By this metric, you could claim that &lt;a href="http://Blogads.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;Blogads.com&lt;/a&gt; was the world's biggest publisher of content for men. It's not true, because network traffic shouldn't be compared to actual site traffic.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ted</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2007 17:56:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: ENotes, a site that &amp;#8212; surprise &amp;#8212; charges for online classroom material</title><link>http://venturebeat.disqus.com/enotes_a_site_that_8212_surprise_8212_charges_for_online_classroom_material/#comment-14678059</link><description>Interesting, I guess it shows there is a niche market for paid content after all. Business content, definitely. Educational I wasn't aware of, but it makes sense.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ted</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 01 Sep 2007 13:01:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Questia founder moves on to stealth semantic startup PeoplePad</title><link>http://venturebeat.disqus.com/questia_founder_moves_on_to_stealth_semantic_startup_peoplepad/#comment-14682412</link><description>Sounds interesting but based on Questia it's hard to have a lot of faith in the eventual execution.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ted</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 21:47:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: ThisNext Raises Round of Venture Debt</title><link>http://mashable.disqus.com/thisnext_raises_round_of_venture_debt/#comment-5950003</link><description>Could you explain what "venture debt" is?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ted</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 07 Jun 2007 13:24:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 2007/07/12/congoo-social-network/</title><link>http://mashable.disqus.com/thread_9976/#comment-5966582</link><description>What algorithms are incorporated into their service?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ted</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 12 Jul 2007 16:44:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How Age Matters In Media, Web Services, And Social Networking</title><link>http://publishing20.disqus.com/how_age_matters_in_media_web_services_and_social_networking/#comment-13571148</link><description>I don't think that those of us in the older generation (I'm 30) don't "get" Facebook, it's just that we don't need Facebook. I'm married with a child and my life is pretty well proscribed. My friends are available via Cel phone or email, and there aren't so many of them that I need or want to be using Facebook. When I was in college, or even for the few years after college when I was very socially active, it would have been great. But now, it really isn't all that useful for me beyond the novelty.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ted</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 17 Jun 2007 15:40:41 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>