Hello!
The comments on this profile are unclaimed and thus are unverified.
Do they belong to you? Claim these comments.
Patrick
Is this you? Claim Profile »
9 months ago
in Soccer Fans: Boycott Sony Bravia HD TVs on EPL Talk
hey are you going to give up your sony pictured in this post
http://www.soccerondish.com/lets-not-get-our-ho...
http://www.soccerondish.com/lets-not-get-our-ho...
1 reply
9 months ago
in Sheffield United Players Should Sue West Ham United on EPL Talk
Martin Samuels really does sum it up well.
Amazing how something like this shows off people true colors. This site has been crap for some time.
Amazing how something like this shows off people true colors. This site has been crap for some time.
- 0 points
- Jump to »
Johnathan Starling
So Patrick, I ask you again...why do you continue to come to this site if this site has been 'crap for some time'.
I'll say it again, thank you for your readership and continued readership.
I'll say it again, thank you for your readership and continued readership.
9 months ago
in Sheffield United Players Should Sue West Ham United on EPL Talk
GAFFER a new low...
its clear now that its just personal for you. as you have a very thin grasp of the facts of this situation. and maybe its easier for you that way to hold onto this line of argument that the Club is a bunch of cheats.
I could run through this item by item but its frankly old and boring. Do you even understand what it is that let SUFC finally win on its 4th or 5th try???
Do you understand why they won this last judgement?
its from hearsay. That Scott Duxbury had a gentleman's agreement with MSI to release Tevez at seasons end. And that was brought forward by a reporter, who had no other proof then hearsay. not even from Kia or Duxbury. mind you this was after the fine, and only in regard to the last three matches.
This was the new evidence that McCabe was screaming about. Not sure how familiar you are with the law in free countries but hearsay isn't admissible.
as for YOU. its one thing to have a blog entry where you state what is in papers etc.. but to say "Sheffield United Players Should Sue West Ham United" the key word being SHOULD - then you need to have some sort of editorial reasoning behind that. In other words you need to prove they SHOULD by providing cause, not just effect.
and no player will sue West Ham. Because they can't. They'd have to sue the FA since it was the FA the 'allowed' them to remain in the league. And I'm not a legal expert, but from things I've read and heard about such suits is they have about as much chance of suing WHU as I do suing SUFC for wasting my time writing this.
and personally I'd like to know how you came up with the assertion " Now that the Football Association appointed arbitration hearing has ruled in the favor of Sheffield United, the club’s players have every right to sue West Ham" what are you basing that statement on?? and as far as I was aware the biggest relegation wage cut can be is 25% so where does your 30 to 50% come from...
not to mention every story I've read mentions 10 players not 12.
are you just making this stuff up?
and what is REALLY the message out of this... is it that smaller clubs like West Ham will be given the shaft for the same activity that routinely happens at 'big four' clubs, you may recall a certain wink wink handshake deal Man U had that very same season. But it was not proceeded with because most of the evidence was 'hearsay'. or just about any deal that happens at CFC
have a good weekend
its clear now that its just personal for you. as you have a very thin grasp of the facts of this situation. and maybe its easier for you that way to hold onto this line of argument that the Club is a bunch of cheats.
I could run through this item by item but its frankly old and boring. Do you even understand what it is that let SUFC finally win on its 4th or 5th try???
Do you understand why they won this last judgement?
its from hearsay. That Scott Duxbury had a gentleman's agreement with MSI to release Tevez at seasons end. And that was brought forward by a reporter, who had no other proof then hearsay. not even from Kia or Duxbury. mind you this was after the fine, and only in regard to the last three matches.
This was the new evidence that McCabe was screaming about. Not sure how familiar you are with the law in free countries but hearsay isn't admissible.
as for YOU. its one thing to have a blog entry where you state what is in papers etc.. but to say "Sheffield United Players Should Sue West Ham United" the key word being SHOULD - then you need to have some sort of editorial reasoning behind that. In other words you need to prove they SHOULD by providing cause, not just effect.
and no player will sue West Ham. Because they can't. They'd have to sue the FA since it was the FA the 'allowed' them to remain in the league. And I'm not a legal expert, but from things I've read and heard about such suits is they have about as much chance of suing WHU as I do suing SUFC for wasting my time writing this.
and personally I'd like to know how you came up with the assertion " Now that the Football Association appointed arbitration hearing has ruled in the favor of Sheffield United, the club’s players have every right to sue West Ham" what are you basing that statement on?? and as far as I was aware the biggest relegation wage cut can be is 25% so where does your 30 to 50% come from...
not to mention every story I've read mentions 10 players not 12.
are you just making this stuff up?
and what is REALLY the message out of this... is it that smaller clubs like West Ham will be given the shaft for the same activity that routinely happens at 'big four' clubs, you may recall a certain wink wink handshake deal Man U had that very same season. But it was not proceeded with because most of the evidence was 'hearsay'. or just about any deal that happens at CFC
have a good weekend
1 reply
The Gaffer
Patrick,
Obviously we disagree about the statements made in this article. It's a matter of my opinion, which you don't agree with -- and you're entitled to that.
But rather than be negative, let's turn it around. If you're not satisfied with the quality of the articles here, I've given you an opportunity to write your own. You ignored that.
So, tell me, what topics would you like to see covered that you feel would be interesting to read. Your feedback is welcomed.
Cheers,
The Gaffer
Obviously we disagree about the statements made in this article. It's a matter of my opinion, which you don't agree with -- and you're entitled to that.
But rather than be negative, let's turn it around. If you're not satisfied with the quality of the articles here, I've given you an opportunity to write your own. You ignored that.
So, tell me, what topics would you like to see covered that you feel would be interesting to read. Your feedback is welcomed.
Cheers,
The Gaffer
9 months ago
in Tell Us What’s Missing In Your Soccer Experience on EPL Talk
So you make a slanderous post filled with half truths to fill the gap?
sorry but my opinion of this blog is gone.
sorry but my opinion of this blog is gone.
2 replies
Johnathan Starling
I have to admit, when I read comments like this last once Patrick, it makes me ask a simple question...why continue to come back?
The last time I checked you could go to any blog you wanted to, yet you continue to come back?
So to that I say thank you for your readership and your continued readership.
The last time I checked you could go to any blog you wanted to, yet you continue to come back?
So to that I say thank you for your readership and your continued readership.
9 months ago
in Tell Us What’s Missing In Your Soccer Experience on EPL Talk
What's missing is insightful posts on this blog.
end of
end of
1 reply
The Gaffer
Patrick,
Let me know if you're interested in writing insightful articles for EPL Talk. Seriously. Otherwise, please be patient. It's not easy coming up with insightful posts every day : )
Cheers,
The Gaffer
Let me know if you're interested in writing insightful articles for EPL Talk. Seriously. Otherwise, please be patient. It's not easy coming up with insightful posts every day : )
Cheers,
The Gaffer
It's not my TV. Check to see who wrote the article.
Cheers,
THe Gaffer