Disqus - Latest Comments for red wolverine

Re: Liberal media my ass, part 6,291,820,001

red wolverine — Wed, 12 Sep 2007 18:18:20 -0000

I love how you just took the study at face value and left it at that.

This study is the most flawed study I have seen in a while, and I understand how to read social science studies.

I give a very detailed analysis below.

Media Matters Spouts its Own Flawed Study as Fact: How They Did It, In Great Detail

Re: Michigan Primaries Predictions

red wolverine — Tue, 15 Jan 2008 17:18:35 -0000

Looks like Romney is gonna win this one!!!!!!!! NOt that I want Romney. . but this knocks McCain out of the box.

Re: Crossing the Line - The Digital Journalist

red wolverine — Tue, 06 Jan 2009 01:38:59 -0000

I happen to prefer Fox News over all the other Networks. Many people wrongly believe that Fair and Balanced means objective; it doesn't.

Fair and Balanced means that everyone is biased in one way or another, and knowing that, the journalist needs to give a fair assessment of the facts, and let the opposition be heard if you are to give an opinion.

Most people who hate Fox News never actually watch their News segments and think that Fox is nothing other than O'Reilly / Hannity 24/7. The fact of the matter is that their News is Fair and Balanced, but their appeal is that their commentators lean Right, unlike all other shows.

People watch Fox News because they know what they are getting: Fair and Balanced reporting. MSNBC, however, still calls Olbermann a News program.

Re: “This is how scandals unravel. You find a thread and you pull it.”

red wolverine — Tue, 31 Jul 2007 02:04:38 -0000

Copious Dissent - Your Daily Dose of Liberty.

Re: April 1, 2009 | Tea Bag the Fools in D.C.

red wolverine — Sat, 21 Feb 2009 15:24:37 -0000

Hi Rick:

I'd love to join your Tea Party. Please get behind the FairTax!!

Re: The Problem with Uninformed Liberals

red wolverine — Tue, 07 Aug 2007 20:29:02 -0000

I surf the liberal blogs often. It is amazing.

Sometimes I have to help them start their arguments.

They are so used to the typical comments, "Neo-con, big corp, global warming flat-earther." They don't even know what they stand for, and why.

Devil's Advocate
Editorialist
Copious Dissent - Your Daily Dose of Liberty

Re: Only in America: The \"Light Bulb Freedom of Choice Act\"

red wolverine — Fri, 11 Apr 2008 12:42:04 -0000

Will you people please listen to yourselves.

You are banning a light bulbs.

Even if nobody used light bulbs and lit their homes by candle, it would not change the temperature of the Earth.

This is just a stupid law, and it will increase the amount of mercury in our homes and in our landfills. What a terrible idea!!!

Re: Feingold's Censure Move More Of The Same Old Same Old

red wolverine — Mon, 23 Jul 2007 00:54:24 -0000

Well, while Feingold is a joke, there is a spectrum of abject absurdity.

This isn't as bad as West Hollywood's recent resolution to impeach Bush and Cheney.

They did it in the name of the Constitution.

Had they read the Constitution, they would have realize they are not the House of Representatives.

Devil's Advocate
Editorialist
[url=http://copiousdissent.blogspot.com]Copious Dissent - Your Daily Dose of Liberty[/url]

Re: Ironic: Obama's "Open For Questions" Feature On Change.gov Website Censoring Questions About Blago

red wolverine — Wed, 10 Dec 2008 22:59:08 -0000

They also censored my "open" comments that refuted global warming on their "open" green section.