Disqus - Latest Comments for John

Re: The Killer Video Card for SolidWorks?

John — Tue, 21 Aug 2007 09:48:37 -0000

I'm looking at getting the FX-4600 - anybody using one? How does it compare with the ATI's?

Re: The Killer Video Card for SolidWorks?

John — Wed, 22 Aug 2007 16:20:11 -0000

Thanks Josh - much appreciated. I am looking to order a Dell 30" monitor with dual quad-core CPU's... since I'm not paying for it - I went all out. I suspect my assemblies may get rather large in due time and I want to be ready....

John

Re: The Killer Video Card for SolidWorks?

John — Thu, 23 Aug 2007 07:50:24 -0000

Thanks Josh. Is there a standard benchmark I could run using SW2007? Is there perhaps an EXE that uses SW to provide a benchmark?

Re: The Killer Video Card for SolidWorks?

John — Thu, 23 Aug 2007 13:04:25 -0000

Just ran the SPEC test and here are the results for my current computer - could you post yours so I can see how much better a quad-core CPU would be:

1 12.50 14.60
2 12.50 10.70
3 12.50 10.70
4 12.50 9.84
5 12.50 24.90
6 12.50 18.70
7 12.50 35.70
8 12.50 15.00
Weighted Geometric Mean = 15.91

Re: The Killer Video Card for SolidWorks?

John — Thu, 23 Aug 2007 13:57:47 -0000

Thanks Josh - I can't find that file (nor the Benchmark folder). All I ran was the Solidworks test - should I have ran ALL TESTS? I have these files:

viewperflog.txt
viewperfresult.txt

No biggie. I would like to, though, compare what I have now to the computer I will be getting so I need to do a complete test.... thanks.

Re: The Killer Video Card for SolidWorks?

John — Thu, 23 Aug 2007 18:47:51 -0000

Here you go:

Model : Precision WorkStation 380
OS : Microsoft Windows XP Professional
OS SP : Service Pack 2
CPU : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 3.60GHz
# of CPU : 2
Memory : 3582

Test Averages for 5 tests(s).
Test Total = 286.07
Graphics = 106.61
CPU = 78.82
I/O = 100.64

Re: What do you like? Win a 4GB Flash Drive.

John — Wed, 05 Sep 2007 08:06:28 -0000

I like the fact that the Solidworks community is such a tight-knit group of people willing to share their knowledge and help one another out. Of course blogs such as SOLIDSMACK make that so much easier and fun... thanks for a great place to learn about our beloved Solidworks.....

Re: Best Out of Office Replies

John — Tue, 18 Sep 2007 08:23:05 -0000

If you really don't want to receive any more emails from somebody try this:

" This computer has been infected with a virus from john.doe@company.com. This virus poses an ongoing threat - in order to avoid a possible computer crash you must refrain from sending any more emails to this address "

Should slow down your emails until I.T. investigates......

Re: Best Out of Office Replies

John — Tue, 18 Sep 2007 13:01:51 -0000

You might also add:

" I've joined the Boy Scouts, somewhere with adult supervision...."

Re: SolidSmack Mystery Meat: Assembly Features For Weldments

John — Thu, 22 May 2008 09:46:35 -0000

I really would love for SW to treat weldments as assemblies - in other words give us all of the assembly features in weldments - particularly in the drawing environment. One think I would like to know how you guys are doing it is limiting the depth of a section cut in a weldment drawing. In an assembly it can easily be done just drag how far back you want the cut to go (how much is shown behind the actual cut plane). In a weldment - sections you create go on forever - showing everything. I know you can show only cut members where the only objects it displays are those up against the cut plane but that's not standard drafting practice. Any suggestions are welcome.....

Re: SolidSmack Mystery Meat: Assembly Features For Weldments

John — Thu, 22 May 2008 18:54:58 -0000

Thanks guys - I tried it with configurations but a section view takes on the config of the view it's taken from - I can't have a plan view let's say of a part, section it through the middle and only have a slice about a foot thick (for instance). Is that what you mean - have one config for the main view and another for the section view?

Re: The 7 Best SolidWorks Keyboard Tricks

John — Fri, 30 May 2008 09:48:49 -0000

I have a few basic ones but my favorites are using the number pad on the keyboard:

5-top view
0-bottom view
4-left view
6-right view
+-isometric view
2-front view
8-back view

It really speeds things up.

Re: From PDF to Solid: More Fun Using Images to Create SolidWorks Layouts

John — Thu, 05 Jun 2008 08:50:53 -0000

Good stuff. I tried Print Screen but the resolution is not that great. Try this - open the PDF file, select the Snapshot tool, ZOOM IN (important) into one of the the corners of the drawing, click on the corner to start the snapshot tool then drag to the opposite corner - the screen will pan automatically. This will grab the image to the clipboard at a much higher resolution. You can then paste it into your favorite bitmap program and save as a JPG.

MasterJack

Re: One Week From Now: SolidWorks 2009 MADNESS

John — Tue, 29 Jul 2008 13:49:13 -0000

I have not had a chance to play with 2009 a lot but I hope the Weldments feature will be expanded on. Especially how it handles cut-lists. Would be great if you could treat a weldment (or multi-body) part as an assembly - with features such as limited section cuts.

Re: SolidWorks 2009 Unleashed. New Features, Killer Performance.

John — Tue, 05 Aug 2008 09:47:46 -0000

Thanks for the goodies. I have been messing with 2009 on and off - I love it thus far. One think they should have done is to take your numeric input in sketches and give you the option to convert them to actual dimensions. That way you can dimension your part as you draw it - at least have it be an option. Please correct me if I'm wrong but I don't think that's an option.

John

Re: Ask the Reader: How Do You Model? Plus A Top-Down Modeling Challenge

John — Wed, 13 Aug 2008 08:55:25 -0000

My first choice would be something with Weldments since that's about 90% of what I do. Thanks for all of your informative posts - I really love this site!

Re: Two SolidWorks Macros For Blazin’ Fast Assembly Work

John — Wed, 29 Oct 2008 12:26:29 -0000

Rod - where might I find that set of macros?