<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for Chris</title><link>http://disqus.com/people/642811b005b6d1cc6ebbdb0d211821f2/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Jul 2006 21:02:40 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Broadband Bad News is Good News . . . but it&amp;#8217;s Bad News</title><link>http://tlf.disqus.com/broadband_bad_news_is_good_news_but_it8217s_bad_news/#comment-1446554</link><description>&lt;p&gt;You're making a bit of a thinking error in the opening statement by confusing percentages of a set quantity with percentages as a relative measure.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;It's true that you can only have about ten double-digit increases towards a set limit, but growth percentages are usually expressed as the percent added to a previous total. Thus if my rock show is half again as loud as last year's, I've managed a 50% increase... and a total volume of 150% (of last year's volume). Clearly I can only make 100% as much noise right now as I'm making right now, but that doesn't prevent me from adding more to it in the future (relative increase), as long as I don't blow up my amp or break the noise ordinance (absolute limit).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;None of this invalidates your larger point, and it goes a long way towards pointing out, as you're doing, the difference between limited and infinite growth.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Chris</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 17 Jul 2006 21:02:40 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>