<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for Jamie</title><link>http://disqus.com/people/62c795f7890d6c5b889b665f457320ee/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 06:20:16 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: MacFUSE with Objective-C</title><link>http://toxicsoftware.disqus.com/macfuse_with_objective_c/#comment-1656039</link><description>Something I really want to know about FUSE:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Is it possible to have a VFS mounted in only one applications address space?  I'm trying to find a way to encrypt a directory of python scripts and have them mounted virtually inside the host application in order to make it harder for hackers to see whats going on.  Basically I don't want to mount the FS and then have it accessible via the Finder for example, only in the application that mounts it (I presume this is possible via the C API)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Possible?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jamie</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 21 Jan 2007 14:50:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: MacFUSE with Objective-C</title><link>http://toxicsoftware.disqus.com/macfuse_with_objective_c/#comment-1656043</link><description>schwa:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thats very very interesting to learn about!  Does it handle encryption though?  That would be perfect!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jamie</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 23 Jan 2007 18:11:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Static Code Analizers for Python | And Now For Something Completely Different</title><link>http://doughellmann.disqus.com/static_code_analizers_for_python_and_now_for_something_completely_different/#comment-8565738</link><description>Great article Doug - thanks for the round-up.  Your thoughts helped me assess where to jump on board with this task.  I've run with PyLint for now since its more comprehensive than any other tool: takes a while to get a config sorted but I think its worth the effort.  Also, its a bit disconcerting to go back to C++ type build times, but again, worth it for bugs caught I hope!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jamie</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 06:20:16 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>