<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for Darren Chamberlain</title><link>http://disqus.com/people/622a34307765c2f7c1dfdc7345842418/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Apr 2007 08:54:47 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Why Don&amp;#8217;t We Clean Up The PGP Key Servers?</title><link>http://danielrm26.disqus.com/why_don8217t_we_clean_up_the_pgp_key_servers/#comment-4350510</link><description>+1&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I think the operators of the keyservers disagree, though.  In the past, I spent some time on the gnupg-users list, and every once in a while someone would ask how to delete their old unusable keys, and the keyserver operators would chime in with reasons about why it was a bad idea.  I don't remember most of the reasons, but I was never quite convinced.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Darren Chamberlain</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2006 14:10:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why I Hate Mailing Lists</title><link>http://danielrm26.disqus.com/why_i_hate_mailing_lists/#comment-4353730</link><description>I've found that most of the lists I'm on -- which are mostly deeply technical lists hosted by the &lt;a href="http://w3.org" rel="nofollow"&gt;w3.org&lt;/a&gt;, sourceforge, &lt;a href="http://perl.org" rel="nofollow"&gt;perl.org&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://python.org" rel="nofollow"&gt;python.org&lt;/a&gt;, and so on -- tend to not have this problem.  I don't know what kinds of lists you're on, of course, but I think the symptoms you are describing are symptoms of amateurism (not on your part; I mean the people who are setting up the autoresponders), and not inherent in the medium.  For many lists, something like Google/Yahoo groups are probably the most appropriate -- I think that those systems do a good job at filtering out this kind of thing, while mailman and majordomo don't even attempt it.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;@Marcin:  I have never been able to get into web-based message boards and forums.  The batch-based nature of the web simply doesn't translate well to an interactive conversation.  I've yet to see a forums system that doesn't repeat all of the problems of usenet, without any of the solutions or optimizations that arose around usenet, like intelligent, protocol-specific clients and redistribution/local caching.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Darren Chamberlain</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 05 Apr 2007 08:54:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why Don&amp;#8217;t We Clean Up The PGP Key Servers?</title><link>http://drm.disqus.com/why_don8217t_we_clean_up_the_pgp_key_servers/#comment-11145943</link><description>+1&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I think the operators of the keyservers disagree, though.  In the past, I spent some time on the gnupg-users list, and every once in a while someone would ask how to delete their old unusable keys, and the keyserver operators would chime in with reasons about why it was a bad idea.  I don't remember most of the reasons, but I was never quite convinced.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Darren Chamberlain</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2006 14:10:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why I Hate Mailing Lists</title><link>http://drm.disqus.com/why_i_hate_mailing_lists/#comment-11157278</link><description>I've found that most of the lists I'm on -- which are mostly deeply technical lists hosted by the &lt;a href="http://w3.org" rel="nofollow"&gt;w3.org&lt;/a&gt;, sourceforge, &lt;a href="http://perl.org" rel="nofollow"&gt;perl.org&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://python.org" rel="nofollow"&gt;python.org&lt;/a&gt;, and so on -- tend to not have this problem.  I don't know what kinds of lists you're on, of course, but I think the symptoms you are describing are symptoms of amateurism (not on your part; I mean the people who are setting up the autoresponders), and not inherent in the medium.  For many lists, something like Google/Yahoo groups are probably the most appropriate -- I think that those systems do a good job at filtering out this kind of thing, while mailman and majordomo don't even attempt it.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;@Marcin:  I have never been able to get into web-based message boards and forums.  The batch-based nature of the web simply doesn't translate well to an interactive conversation.  I've yet to see a forums system that doesn't repeat all of the problems of usenet, without any of the solutions or optimizations that arose around usenet, like intelligent, protocol-specific clients and redistribution/local caching.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Darren Chamberlain</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 05 Apr 2007 08:54:47 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>