Do they belong to you? Claim these comments.
Nic
Is this you? Claim Profile »
2 months ago
in BlackNotes on BlackNotes
It helps that the main woman is hot! - I think she'd probably puke in her mouth if she read this comment.
1 reply
wesblackmore
Haha, turns out she is Michelle Nunes, Miss Hooters International 2006 Winner (updated the post). So yeah she probably would.
5 months ago
in Jake and Amir Podcast on Jake and Amir
Dudes, the podcast isn't available in South Africa iTunes - hook us up with a downloadable version or RSS feed for readers....
7 months ago
in Quick Nokia rant on Paul Jacobson
Testing out seesmic
1 reply
pauljacobson
Seesmic video reply from Disqus.
8 months ago
in WTF Is Up With England on The Inquisitr
You're kidding right. You are based in the USA? "Hello, Kettle? Yes, this is the pot, I think you're black". Ahem.
1 reply
StevenHodson
actually I am a Canadian who was born in England. The last time I checked in both the US and Canada you didn't need to show a passport or any kind of identification when buying a pay as you go phone.
10 months ago
in BlackNotes on BlackNotes
Fred - I'm not sure I agree with you. A marginalised cause hasn't been put on the map, unfortunately it seems as though the mechanisms used to promote the campaign have been put on the map and punted across the board by bloggers and geeks alike. Not the cause. And I think it's a crying shame that this is what has happened.
1 reply
Fred
Nic, I understand your point and I fully understand the point of this rant - BUT, still, you cannot deny that people are talking about the project. Lately I've heard people mention it at braai's, in meetings, and at work. People are asking 'what is autism?'
To be frank, I think a only handful of bloggers are now talking about the 'mechanisms used to promote the campaign'. I think Gerhard can live with that, because far more people are talking about autism.
That's a good thing.
To be frank, I think a only handful of bloggers are now talking about the 'mechanisms used to promote the campaign'. I think Gerhard can live with that, because far more people are talking about autism.
That's a good thing.
10 months ago
in BlackNotes on BlackNotes
Great idea, real life blogging from that perspective for the cause, consistently, not in a barrage of content!
10 months ago
in BlackNotes on BlackNotes
But Nev - Do you think that forcing it upon people will help to educate them or help to create a "billboard" sort of ignoring about the topic? Surely forcibly pushing the topic at people insufferably is not the right way to do it? It's overkill and all it ends up doing is desensitising people to the real issue at hand. This is NOT criticism of the cause in any way, shape or form, it is a comment on the mechanisms being used to promote it.
1 reply
Neville Newey
> But Nev - Do you think that forcing it upon people will help to educate them
No I don't think so, I think you guys are probably right. I think perhaps it needs a good blogger to blog real life issues autistics face, perhaps like a Tertia.
No I don't think so, I think you guys are probably right. I think perhaps it needs a good blogger to blog real life issues autistics face, perhaps like a Tertia.
10 months ago
in Dubbya: caption this! on Splattermail
Bush: "Shake that ass for me, shake that ass for me," smack
11 months ago
in BlackNotes on BlackNotes
Top Class. This IS RHODES through and through and through. I haven't seen a more accurate depiction of "The walk of shame"!!
1 reply
Wezz
Ah Nic you and your Rhodes affiliation.... this Walk of Shame phenomenon will happen at any fine establishment where you'll find a combination of booze, 19-22 yr olds, beer pong a quad full of hungover degenerates. Man I miss it :'(
11 months ago
in Jake And Amir Dot Com on Jake and Amir
Absolutely brilliant. It's like this has been planned for months. Love it.
11 months ago
in Rex The Lion is a Pussy Cat on Justin Hartman
Justin - I completely agree with you. Rex could/should be more flaming with the baiting.
1 year ago
in I love my ScanSnap … just not the one Nic loves on Paul Jacobson
Hey Paul,
My review doesn't say that the ScanSnap is without Adobe V7. I mention that:
"Once the drivers and software are installed you’ll need to install Adobe Reader Standard. V.7 is supplied and it worked simply and effectively too. I wish that there was more for me to write regarding the installation but there isn’t. It really was that simple."
Direct quote above states that Adobe reader standard V.7 is supplied and worked!!
My review doesn't say that the ScanSnap is without Adobe V7. I mention that:
"Once the drivers and software are installed you’ll need to install Adobe Reader Standard. V.7 is supplied and it worked simply and effectively too. I wish that there was more for me to write regarding the installation but there isn’t. It really was that simple."
Direct quote above states that Adobe reader standard V.7 is supplied and worked!!
1 year ago
in I love my ScanSnap … just not the one Nic loves on Paul Jacobson
Hey Paul,
My review doesn't say that the ScanSnap is without Adobe V7. I mention that:
"Once the drivers and software are installed you’ll need to install Adobe Reader Standard. V.7 is supplied and it worked simply and effectively too. I wish that there was more for me to write regarding the installation but there isn’t. It really was that simple."
Direct quote above states that Adobe reader standard V.7 is supplied and worked!!
My review doesn't say that the ScanSnap is without Adobe V7. I mention that:
"Once the drivers and software are installed you’ll need to install Adobe Reader Standard. V.7 is supplied and it worked simply and effectively too. I wish that there was more for me to write regarding the installation but there isn’t. It really was that simple."
Direct quote above states that Adobe reader standard V.7 is supplied and worked!!
1 year ago
in Man from Discovery wanted to shoot my son on Justin Hartman
Holy shit dude, that title is utter crap. what a load of shit!! You scared the bejeezus outta me!! :)
But in the end, funny story!!
But in the end, funny story!!
1 year ago
in The newest addition to our family on Justin Hartman
Wow dude, fantastic moments! Incredibly happy for you and the family. Very glad that Luke loves his little brother and that your preparations worked out. Good form.
Also stoked that Colette is doing well!! :) So much for sleep hey, not that you got much before, but now, your stuffed!
Enjoy your time with the family.
Also stoked that Colette is doing well!! :) So much for sleep hey, not that you got much before, but now, your stuffed!
Enjoy your time with the family.
1 year ago
in SA Blog Awards, WTF? on Justin Hartman
@Andre brilliant question, that's the sort of transparency I was talking bout.
1 year ago
in SA Blog Awards, WTF? on Justin Hartman
Justin - what makes my comment so bad? The fact that I want to win? That's ridiculous. Why participate if you don't want to win. It's not SA Rocks's fault that the organisers didn't open the awards up to amagama, iblog and 24.com. that would've been brilliant as we have discussed before. I back that move 100%. I am not saying that it's right that the event is perceived as an elitist event, it's not right at all, but before we get in to that debate I'd like to know how many blogs received nominations in the first round. I think we'd be surprised.
And let's be honest we are all very heavily embedded in this elitist regime it appears. I must tell you SA Rocks readership is not the blogosphere as much as it is the average user commenting on a story they googled.
And it is nice to be recognised for your efforts. My comment on this is perfectly justifiable dude. If I'm nominated it's nice to win, ego in or ego out, people like to win stuff and be recognised by anyone anywhere at anytime. Ofcourse if the awards were more reputable with more entires and the like then it'd be better to win and to participate. But that's y we are having this debate i guess, to improve things.
And let's be honest we are all very heavily embedded in this elitist regime it appears. I must tell you SA Rocks readership is not the blogosphere as much as it is the average user commenting on a story they googled.
And it is nice to be recognised for your efforts. My comment on this is perfectly justifiable dude. If I'm nominated it's nice to win, ego in or ego out, people like to win stuff and be recognised by anyone anywhere at anytime. Ofcourse if the awards were more reputable with more entires and the like then it'd be better to win and to participate. But that's y we are having this debate i guess, to improve things.
1 year ago
in SA Blog Awards, WTF? on Justin Hartman
OK, so this sort of post has been coming, whether from you or someone else.
Firstly let me say that 1. I am stoked to be nominated for SA Rocks in two categories and 2. I wont comment on the Thoughtleader issue because both my nominations are in both of TL's categories.
So on to my thoughts:
I agree that transparency is essential to this sort of event/awards. I am not referring to transparency from organisers about things like their involvement. That's been handled well this year. I think it's important that people know what criteria the finalists were selected upon; most votes, most like by organisers/most this-that-or-the-next-thing. Whatever, just let us know.
Then I do think it's important that if you are willing to organise this event that you take ownership/responsibility of it. ie: make sure decisions are made, expressed and acted upon. Don't leave us in the lurch as users/readers/nominees/finalists. Talk to us, get all "web 2.0" on us. hehehe.
Groogle is right as far as I can tell and I'm not ashamed to admit it. I've said it before, blogging is egotistical and awards, by their very nature are ego-feeding. So what? Yes the prize is really a non-entity this year and yes there isn't alot of "esteem" attached to it in some eyes but you know what, i still like to be recognised, as I am sure the other finalists will agree. And in fact, I would really like to win at least one award and I will put that little badge on my blog if I do!
In the end, I think you've written a good post Justin. I agree with the judges issue, that is absurd especially when the awards are almost over. That needs to be rectified immediately by someone involved with the awards. And I'm glad you've posed some solutions and want to get involved. Hopefully it'll make the world of difference next year.
Oh - my last point and own point - Why the hell do we have 2007 awards 3 months in to 2008? Doesn't it make more sense to hold the 2008 awards (the ones for this year) at the end of this year closer to November than April of the following year? Just a thought.
Firstly let me say that 1. I am stoked to be nominated for SA Rocks in two categories and 2. I wont comment on the Thoughtleader issue because both my nominations are in both of TL's categories.
So on to my thoughts:
I agree that transparency is essential to this sort of event/awards. I am not referring to transparency from organisers about things like their involvement. That's been handled well this year. I think it's important that people know what criteria the finalists were selected upon; most votes, most like by organisers/most this-that-or-the-next-thing. Whatever, just let us know.
Then I do think it's important that if you are willing to organise this event that you take ownership/responsibility of it. ie: make sure decisions are made, expressed and acted upon. Don't leave us in the lurch as users/readers/nominees/finalists. Talk to us, get all "web 2.0" on us. hehehe.
Groogle is right as far as I can tell and I'm not ashamed to admit it. I've said it before, blogging is egotistical and awards, by their very nature are ego-feeding. So what? Yes the prize is really a non-entity this year and yes there isn't alot of "esteem" attached to it in some eyes but you know what, i still like to be recognised, as I am sure the other finalists will agree. And in fact, I would really like to win at least one award and I will put that little badge on my blog if I do!
In the end, I think you've written a good post Justin. I agree with the judges issue, that is absurd especially when the awards are almost over. That needs to be rectified immediately by someone involved with the awards. And I'm glad you've posed some solutions and want to get involved. Hopefully it'll make the world of difference next year.
Oh - my last point and own point - Why the hell do we have 2007 awards 3 months in to 2008? Doesn't it make more sense to hold the 2008 awards (the ones for this year) at the end of this year closer to November than April of the following year? Just a thought.
1 year ago
in How important is money? on Justin Hartman
Great post dude. I back you 100% on this one. I am probably a bit more outspoken and willing to say that I do think that money can make me happy. Firmly believe that. Money is my passion, I am passionate about business, blogging, writing, journalism and all of these things garner me.. you guessed it... more money.
Good post.
Good post.
1 year ago
in Metro Police bullies on Paul Jacobson
When it's your loved ones committing the crime it is labelled a mistake, when a taxi does it he/she are branded dogs, animals, rubbish, pigs. How is this fair?
How bout showing some equality here. Breaking the law is breaking the law. there are no exceptions. Simple.
How bout showing some equality here. Breaking the law is breaking the law. there are no exceptions. Simple.
1 year ago
in Metro Police bullies on Paul Jacobson
When it's your loved ones committing the crime it is labelled a mistake, when a taxi does it he/she are branded dogs, animals, rubbish, pigs. How is this fair?
How bout showing some equality here. Breaking the law is breaking the law. there are no exceptions. Simple.
How bout showing some equality here. Breaking the law is breaking the law. there are no exceptions. Simple.
