http://disqus.com/people/60e951f85027b1b24c62c19a92c3fbcb/enThu, 27 Apr 2006 11:21:43 -0000http://dria.disqus.com/help_verify_some_bustage/#comment-1567713Just don't use height and line-height for <a rel="nofollow"> element inside navigation (in common case I usually use vertical padding instead of height + line-height).<br><br>But it's definitely a BUG of IE7b2 that DOESN'T NEED for any workaround and should be reported to Microsoft and fixed by IE programmers before final IE7 ships.<br><br>P. S. Removing _width doesn't change nothing for me. But to make links clickable at its whole area (that probably is the aim of using _width: 1%) I usually use "Star HTML" hack with 1px height for </a><a rel="nofollow"> element. That hack now (since IE7 ignore it in strict mode) is a good way to address CSS rules (that are workaroud of bugs that are NOT longer takes place in IE7) separately for IE5-6 and IE7.</a>MTThu, 27 Apr 2006 11:19:04 -0000http://dria.disqus.com/help_verify_some_bustage/#comment-1567714[sorry for reposting but some my text was handled as real anchor tags while it's not]<br><br>Just don't use height and line-height for [A] element inside navigation (in common case I usually use vertical padding instead of height + line-height).<br><br>But it's definitely a BUG of IE7b2 that DOESN'T NEED for any workaround and should be reported to Microsoft and fixed by IE programmers before final IE7 ships.<br><br>P. S. Removing _width doesn't change nothing for me. But to make links clickable at its whole area (that probably is the aim of using _width: 1%) I usually use "Star HTML" hack with 1px height for [A] element. That hack now (since IE7 ignore it in strict mode) is a good way to address CSS rules (that are workaroud of bugs that are NOT longer takes place in IE7) separately for IE5-6 and IE7.MTThu, 27 Apr 2006 11:21:43 -0000