<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for Arnie - Link Building Mav</title><link>http://disqus.com/people/60dd4086d0099e335f8e5c83b9bc2d8d/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 17:23:34 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: 25 Link Building Tactics to Improve Blog Search Engine Rankings</title><link>http://toprankblog.disqus.com/25_link_building_tactics_to_improve_blog_search_engine_rankings/#comment-22637836</link><description>Ha, I was trying to think of a response to Attention-Starved-Kelly, but all my ideas were pretty snarky.  I like yours.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Arnie - Link Building Mav</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 17:23:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 25 Link Building Tactics to Improve Blog Search Engine Rankings</title><link>http://toprankblog.disqus.com/25_link_building_tactics_to_improve_blog_search_engine_rankings/#comment-22636987</link><description>I understand, figured I would leave it up to you regarding the link.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Arnie - Link Building Mav</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 17:07:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 25 Link Building Tactics to Improve Blog Search Engine Rankings</title><link>http://toprankblog.disqus.com/25_link_building_tactics_to_improve_blog_search_engine_rankings/#comment-22552894</link><description>Lee,&lt;br&gt;Very thorough list.  We like contests in particular as they attract all sorts of links and traffic.  We are just wrapping one of for the health and wellness industry.  In fact if your readers want, they can vote for the winner here (until 11/11/09).&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.verticalmeasures.com/website-publicity/announcing-boost-your-juice-2-finalists/" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.verticalmeasures.com/website-publici...&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Arnie - Link Building Mav</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 11:23:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Real or Fake PageRank Update In Progress (round 3)</title><link>http://andybeard.disqus.com/real_or_fake_pagerank_update_in_progress_round_3_60/#comment-10991963</link><description>I think Amish Furn has it right "quite thunder" and frustrating as heck!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Just for more data... &lt;a href="http://www.aspdotnetstorefront.com/" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.aspdotnetstorefront.com/&lt;/a&gt; was a PR7, dropped to a 6.  Classic ecomm website that has been around for years.  Fresh content, never paid for a link.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Arnie - Link Building Mav</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 27 Oct 2007 15:10:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Real or Fake PageRank Update In Progress (round 3)</title><link>http://andybeard.disqus.com/real_or_fake_pagerank_update_in_progress_round_3_60/#comment-12526408</link><description>I think Amish Furn has it right "quite thunder" and frustrating as heck!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Just for more data... &lt;a href="http://www.aspdotnetstorefront.com/" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.aspdotnetstorefront.com/&lt;/a&gt; was a PR7, dropped to a 6.  Classic ecomm website that has been around for years.  Fresh content, never paid for a link.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Arnie - Link Building Mav</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 27 Oct 2007 15:10:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Digg Favorites Slapped By Google</title><link>http://andybeard.disqus.com/digg_favorites_slapped_by_google_43/#comment-10991818</link><description>You gotta just love the &lt;a href="http://www.YouTube.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;www.YouTube.com&lt;/a&gt; pagerank.  Still sits at 3.  This isn't over by a long shot.  I think it is going to get pretty messy for Google.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;We took a look at the article directories -- all of them lost 1 to 3 notches.  No big surprise there tho.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Also pretty funny how all of us claim not to really care about PR, but this one post has 116 comments.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Arnie - Link Building Mav</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 28 Oct 2007 13:59:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Digg Favorites Slapped By Google</title><link>http://andybeard.disqus.com/digg_favorites_slapped_by_google_43/#comment-12526267</link><description>You gotta just love the &lt;a href="http://www.YouTube.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;www.YouTube.com&lt;/a&gt; pagerank.  Still sits at 3.  This isn't over by a long shot.  I think it is going to get pretty messy for Google.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;We took a look at the article directories -- all of them lost 1 to 3 notches.  No big surprise there tho.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Also pretty funny how all of us claim not to really care about PR, but this one post has 116 comments.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Arnie - Link Building Mav</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 28 Oct 2007 13:59:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Real or Fake PageRank Update In Progress (round 3)</title><link>http://andybeard.disqus.com/real_or_fake_pagerank_update_in_progress_round_3_60/#comment-10991989</link><description>At this point this probably falls into the "beating a dead horse" category, but I just took a look at some directories to see what the PR hit.  Most of the major players like Yahoo, Business and BOTW held their PR.  But here is a random list of others that did not.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Just more data points...&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.alivedirectory.com/" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.alivedirectory.com/&lt;/a&gt; was pr6 now pr4&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.uncoverthenet.com/" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.uncoverthenet.com/&lt;/a&gt; was pr6 now pr0&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.web-directory.org" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.web-directory.org&lt;/a&gt; was pr5 now pr3&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.thisisouryear.com/" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.thisisouryear.com/&lt;/a&gt; was pr5 now pr2&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.the100lists.com/" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.the100lists.com/&lt;/a&gt; was pr5 now pr2&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.directory.v7n.com/" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.directory.v7n.com/&lt;/a&gt;  was pr6 now pr3&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.cyber-find.net/" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.cyber-find.net/&lt;/a&gt;  was pr6 now pr4&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.chiff.com/" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.chiff.com/&lt;/a&gt;  was pr6 now pr5&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.avivadirectory.com/" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.avivadirectory.com/&lt;/a&gt;  was pr6 now pr4</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Arnie - Link Building Mav</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2007 19:39:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Real or Fake PageRank Update In Progress (round 3)</title><link>http://andybeard.disqus.com/real_or_fake_pagerank_update_in_progress_round_3_60/#comment-12526433</link><description>At this point this probably falls into the "beating a dead horse" category, but I just took a look at some directories to see what the PR hit.  Most of the major players like Yahoo, Business and BOTW held their PR.  But here is a random list of others that did not.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Just more data points...&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.alivedirectory.com/" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.alivedirectory.com/&lt;/a&gt; was pr6 now pr4&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.uncoverthenet.com/" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.uncoverthenet.com/&lt;/a&gt; was pr6 now pr0&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.web-directory.org" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.web-directory.org&lt;/a&gt; was pr5 now pr3&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.thisisouryear.com/" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.thisisouryear.com/&lt;/a&gt; was pr5 now pr2&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.the100lists.com/" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.the100lists.com/&lt;/a&gt; was pr5 now pr2&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.directory.v7n.com/" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.directory.v7n.com/&lt;/a&gt;  was pr6 now pr3&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.cyber-find.net/" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.cyber-find.net/&lt;/a&gt;  was pr6 now pr4&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.chiff.com/" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.chiff.com/&lt;/a&gt;  was pr6 now pr5&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.avivadirectory.com/" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.avivadirectory.com/&lt;/a&gt;  was pr6 now pr4</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Arnie - Link Building Mav</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2007 19:39:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Blogrush &amp;#8211; Free Blog Traffic &amp;#8211; In depth Review</title><link>http://andybeard.disqus.com/blogrush_8211_free_blog_traffic_8211_in_depth_review_21/#comment-10991144</link><description>Was just getting ready to add this to my blogs and thought I better see if there are any reviews or better widgets that are similar.  Glad to see you were all over it.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Now that it has been a couple months, do you still recommend it?  I see it is still on your site.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Knowing Reese, I take it his goal is to build a huge subcriber list and an ad platform?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Arnie - Link Building Mav</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 19:52:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Blogrush &amp;#8211; Free Blog Traffic &amp;#8211; In depth Review</title><link>http://andybeard.disqus.com/blogrush_8211_free_blog_traffic_8211_in_depth_review_21/#comment-12525625</link><description>Was just getting ready to add this to my blogs and thought I better see if there are any reviews or better widgets that are similar.  Glad to see you were all over it.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Now that it has been a couple months, do you still recommend it?  I see it is still on your site.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Knowing Reese, I take it his goal is to build a huge subcriber list and an ad platform?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Arnie - Link Building Mav</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 19:52:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Ultimate List of DoFollow &amp;#038; Nofollow Plugins &amp;#8211; Banish Nofollow From Comments and Trackbacks</title><link>http://andybeard.disqus.com/ultimate_list_of_dofollow_038_nofollow_plugins_8211_banish_nofollow_from_comments_and_trackbacks/#comment-10988181</link><description>Andy,&lt;br&gt;I have several blogs and want to make sure to add DO Follow.  Now that ths post is 10 months old, what do you recommend for Wordpress 2.3.1?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Arnie - Link Building Mav</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2007 13:59:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Ultimate List of DoFollow &amp;#038; Nofollow Plugins &amp;#8211; Banish Nofollow From Comments and Trackbacks</title><link>http://andybeard.disqus.com/ultimate_list_of_dofollow_038_nofollow_plugins_8211_banish_nofollow_from_comments_and_trackbacks/#comment-12522873</link><description>Andy,&lt;br&gt;I have several blogs and want to make sure to add DO Follow.  Now that ths post is 10 months old, what do you recommend for Wordpress 2.3.1?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Arnie - Link Building Mav</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2007 13:59:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Portal Feeder vs StomperNet</title><link>http://andybeard.disqus.com/portal_feeder_vs_stompernet_55/#comment-10989305</link><description>Andy,&lt;br&gt;I know this is an older post, but I was surfing around trying to dig up some info on how Google felt about membership groups like StomperNet and PortalFeeder and my search led me here.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The bottom line to these programs is helping build links to member sites (I know the offer other good stuff too).  I love the concept, but something tells me Google frowns on this.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It would be easy for Google to join, discover the members and then penalize them.  Any thoughts on why they don't (seem to)?  Is that they don't feel this is spammy -- more cooperative?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Arnie</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Arnie - Link Building Mav</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 20:38:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Portal Feeder vs StomperNet</title><link>http://andybeard.disqus.com/portal_feeder_vs_stompernet_55/#comment-12523890</link><description>Andy,&lt;br&gt;I know this is an older post, but I was surfing around trying to dig up some info on how Google felt about membership groups like StomperNet and PortalFeeder and my search led me here.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The bottom line to these programs is helping build links to member sites (I know the offer other good stuff too).  I love the concept, but something tells me Google frowns on this.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It would be easy for Google to join, discover the members and then penalize them.  Any thoughts on why they don't (seem to)?  Is that they don't feel this is spammy -- more cooperative?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Arnie</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Arnie - Link Building Mav</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 20:38:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google, Link Popularity and The Future of Text-Link-Ads</title><link>http://sageblogger.disqus.com/google_link_popularity_and_the_future_of_text_link_ads/#comment-1791992</link><description>Well I wish I would have written it down verbatim, but I heard Adam Lasnik of Google say to a large group at SES in Chicago, that sites that are buying links are not getting their money's worth.  That's a pretty powerful comment.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Arnie - Link Building Mav</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 31 Dec 2006 16:06:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google, Link Popularity and The Future of Text-Link-Ads</title><link>http://volodymyrzablotskyy.disqus.com/google_link_popularity_and_the_future_of_text_link_ads/#comment-1620734</link><description>Well I wish I would have written it down verbatim, but I heard Adam Lasnik of Google say to a large group at SES in Chicago, that sites that are buying links are not getting their money's worth.  That's a pretty powerful comment.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Arnie - Link Building Mav</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 31 Dec 2006 16:06:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Social Network Traffic Analysis - 37 Sites Compared </title><link>http://ignitesocialmedia.disqus.com/social_network_traffic_analysis_37_sites_compared/#comment-5541767</link><description>Excellent work!  Some real surprises here too.  Thanks for taking the time to put this together.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Arnie - Link Building Mav</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2008 12:40:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Link Enhancement</title><link>http://usweb.disqus.com/link_enhancement/#comment-9168437</link><description>I think what he means by enhancement is building links to the pages that are linking to you.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Arnie - Link Building Mav</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 09 May 2009 18:40:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Mahalo&amp;#8217;s Answer to Yahoo Answers?  Cold Hard Cash</title><link>http://usweb.disqus.com/mahalo8217s_answer_to_yahoo_answers_cold_hard_cash/#comment-9366597</link><description>I wonder what market share Mahalo has now?  I read the other day that Yahoo Answers owns 90% of the "answers" market share.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Arnie - Link Building Mav</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 13:20:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: ProBlog Power Tools List Blog Pingers Blogging Software 172 blog things</title><link>http://michddotnetworkweblog.disqus.com/problog_power_tools_list_blog_pingers_blogging_software_172_blog_things/#comment-3046609</link><description>Very impressive list - lots of work.  So what do you think is the single best multi-ping tool?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Arnie - Link Building Mav</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 13:37:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twitter&amp;#8217;s 20 Uses for Business and Government</title><link>http://mediaemerging.disqus.com/twitter8217s_20_uses_for_business_and_government/#comment-3329803</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Darn it!  I am really going to have to embrace twitter now.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Arnie - Link Building Mav</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 00:25:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 2008/09/29/social-media-consultant/</title><link>http://mashable.disqus.com/thread_25013/#comment-6021083</link><description>Measure, measure, measure.  Plus I love the Twitter smackdown.  I just read a great post over at SEOMoz related to branding &amp;amp; social media.  Here is the link:&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.seomoz.org/blog/branding-strategies-for-your-social-media-profiles-on-the-web" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.seomoz.org/blog/branding-strategies-...&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Arnie - Link Building Mav</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 20:33:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How to Get the Most Out of LinkedIn</title><link>http://mashable.disqus.com/how_to_get_the_most_out_of_linkedin/#comment-6024966</link><description>I have been on LinkedIn for a long time and only recently have I really learned how to take full advantage of it.  I have generated leads for our business, found old friends, reignited past business relationships and contributed to the community.  It is the one social media I site I actively participate in.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Arnie - Link Building Mav</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2008 11:21:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: HOW TO: Take Control of Your Google Search Results</title><link>http://mashable.disqus.com/how_to_take_control_of_your_google_search_results/#comment-6650701</link><description>Very good info.  Love the tip on BusinessWeek, The WSJ, Entrepreneur and NYT!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Arnie - Link Building Mav</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 10:21:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Teenybopper Network</title><link>http://andrewmcafee.disqus.com/the_teenybopper_network/#comment-8708022</link><description>I must admit I am just now understanding Facebook.  Have been messing with it for 2 years, but see its personal use and business use now.  We recommend it for all of our clients social media marketing.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Arnie - Link Building Mav</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2009 15:35:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Tweets for Boobs | Raising $ for Breast Cancer Research 1 tweet at a time</title><link>http://tweetsforboobs.disqus.com/tweets_for_boobs_raising_for_breast_cancer_research_1_tweet_at_a_time/#comment-20753336</link><description>So how much did AZIMA end up matching in pledges?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Arnie - Link Building Mav</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 20:55:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Top 10 Link Building Sites</title><link>http://ftr.disqus.com/top_10_link_building_sites/#comment-8962226</link><description>Jack,&lt;br&gt;Just found this page by following some backlink data, and would like to suggest our blog &lt;a href="http://www.LinkBuildingBestPractices.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;www.LinkBuildingBestPractices.com&lt;/a&gt; for future lists like this one.&lt;br&gt;Arnie</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Arnie - Link Building Mav</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2008 23:09:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Marketing Pilgrim SEM Scholarship Winner Announced</title><link>http://marketingpilgrim.disqus.com/marketing_pilgrim_sem_scholarship_winner_announced/#comment-9409919</link><description>Congrats Ben.  I just started following this near the end -- great package to win!  Go, go , go!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Arnie - Link Building Mav</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 12 Nov 2006 19:13:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Dear Google, You&amp;#8217;re Giving Me A Headache</title><link>http://marketingpilgrim.disqus.com/dear_google_you8217re_giving_me_a_headache/#comment-9408863</link><description>LOL - the truth "hurts"!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Arnie - Link Building Mav</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 17 Nov 2006 00:54:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Mrs. Beal Will Kill Me&amp;#8230;.</title><link>http://marketingpilgrim.disqus.com/mrs_beal_will_kill_me8230/#comment-9411034</link><description>Don't let her read this (the downsides to iPhone): &lt;a href="http://arstechnica.com/journals/apple.ars/2007/1/10/6559" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://arstechnica.com/journals/apple.ars/2007/...&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Arnie - Link Building Mav</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 11 Jan 2007 00:08:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google &amp;amp; Go Daddy Partner on Webmaster Tools</title><link>http://marketingpilgrim.disqus.com/google_amp_go_daddy_partner_on_webmaster_tools/#comment-9420909</link><description>I hope Google doesn't buy GoDaddy.  GoDaddy is a fun company with incredible support.  I would hate to see anything that would disrupt that.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;BTW - I added the Google stuff to one of my blogs this morning and it worked perfectly.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Arnie - Link Building Mav</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2007 19:22:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Purchase Links or Build Website Networks?</title><link>http://marketingpilgrim.disqus.com/purchase_links_or_build_website_networks/#comment-9421344</link><description>I am a big advocate of "own it" rather than "rent it", so I would support any company initiative to build high quality, niche sites supporting their marketing and link building efforts.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Arnie - Link Building Mav</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2007 08:33:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Ten Tips for Buying Paid Links</title><link>http://marketingpilgrim.disqus.com/ten_tips_for_buying_paid_links/#comment-9421912</link><description>I fell for it.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Arnie - Link Building Mav</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2007 00:57:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google Officially Removes Link Building from &amp;#8220;SEO?&amp;#8221;</title><link>http://marketingpilgrim.disqus.com/google_officially_removes_link_building_from_8220seo8221/#comment-9427845</link><description>I think it has to be #2 as #1 would be just evil.  And they can't afford #3. :-)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Arnie - Link Building Mav</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 18:33:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Paid Links - No Longer Worth the Cost?</title><link>http://marketingpilgrim.disqus.com/paid_links_no_longer_worth_the_cost/#comment-9436105</link><description>It would be great to get some detailed definitions from Google, but it will never happen.  I feel sorry for the 100' of thousands of website owners (SMBs)who do not even understand search optimization or know that there is even such a thing as Google Guidelines or Webmaster Central.  They can be penalized and innocent at the same time.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Arnie - Link Building Mav</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 10:57:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How one blog comment can bring you 230+ unique visitors</title><link>http://markosaric.disqus.com/how_one_blog_comment_can_bring_you_230_unique_visitors/#comment-11505497</link><description>We actually offer blog commenting as a part of our services for our clients.  We do not spam clients, instead we learn their business and try to make solid, informative comments on appropriate blogs.  The results have been excellent both from a link building and traffic perspective.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Arnie - Link Building Mav</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 02 Jan 2009 12:11:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Slow Down, SEO is Still Very New: Not Everyone is Ready to Embrace It</title><link>http://techipedia.disqus.com/slow_down_seo_is_still_very_new_not_everyone_is_ready_to_embrace_it/#comment-14967866</link><description>One year later and it's all still true!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Arnie - Link Building Mav</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 25 Nov 2007 12:34:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Video Optimization and Analytics: A closer look at YouTube Insight</title><link>http://10e20.disqus.com/video_optimization_and_analytics_a_closer_look_at_youtube_insight/#comment-16684601</link><description>Excellent post.  We are doing more and more video for our clients and this is very timely.  Going to add you to our blogroll too.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Arnie - Link Building Mav</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2008 17:10:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Social Media Education is Needed Now More Than Ever</title><link>http://10e20.disqus.com/social_media_education_is_needed_now_more_than_ever/#comment-16686465</link><description>We were just having a discussion here on how to do more educating with our clients on social marketing.  We do a lot of implementing for some, but there is still a disconnect for most.  Your list is a good summary of what we run into every week.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Arnie - Link Building Mav</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2009 20:31:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: SES Chicago Social Media Optimization Panel</title><link>http://toprankblog.disqus.com/ses_chicago_social_media_optimization_panel/#comment-17126447</link><description>I watched the WebProNews video - good stuff.  I will also be at SES and look forward to this session.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;What is your view on large companies "encouraging" their employees to bookmark pages on their corporate sites? Or any planned effort to get a lot of bookmarks quickly.  Could even be a school getting their students to bookmakre specific pages. Active SMO or SMO Spam?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Arnie - Link Building Mav</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 28 Nov 2006 22:01:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Session : Link Baiting &amp;#038; Viral Search Success</title><link>http://toprankblog.disqus.com/session_link_baiting_038_viral_search_success/#comment-17126529</link><description>Looking forward to seeing the results of Rand's study.  BTW - they also mentioned at the conference that even if you think you have the perfect content (even a great contest), the odds are it still won't hit the big time.  You have to keep trying it on a consistant basis.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Arnie - Link Building Mav</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 23 Dec 2006 17:28:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Poll: Your top reason for attending marketing conferences?</title><link>http://toprankblog.disqus.com/poll_your_top_reason_for_attending_marketing_conferences/#comment-17132281</link><description>The long list of events is almost ridiculous.  In it's heyday I don't believe the computer industry ever had this many events to attend.  Something will have to give in the future.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Arnie - Link Building Mav</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 11:50:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 5 Ways to Re-Purpose Content for Blog SEO</title><link>http://toprankblog.disqus.com/5_ways_to_re_purpose_content_for_blog_seo/#comment-17133689</link><description>Lee, Barry &amp;amp; Paul,&lt;br&gt;Some great suggestions.  I am not the most prolific writer so it always helps me if I can start with some decent material.  Still takes some work, but it's a very good starting point.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Arnie</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Arnie - Link Building Mav</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2008 10:24:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: SEO Tops Recession Internet Marketing Tactics</title><link>http://toprankblog.disqus.com/seo_tops_recession_internet_marketing_tactics/#comment-17134010</link><description>Lee- 400 responsed is very impressive.  I think video marketing is low based on most people feeling it is complicated and expensive.  That's the feedback we get.  We try to explain how expensive PPC and other tactics (including SEO) are, but limited success with that argument so far.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Arnie - Link Building Mav</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 13:11:17 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>