<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for Alejandro</title><link>http://disqus.com/people/60ab6c66e74b842390548f9cf2240753/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 May 2007 06:48:14 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Helprin on copyright is copywrong</title><link>http://mathewingram.disqus.com/helprin_on_copyright_is_copywrong/#comment-1314291</link><description>In my Spanish-language blog, I wrote pretty much the same: there is no such thing as intellectual property, only intellectual rights that aren't even close to property. Copyright owners have some rights that owners of other kinds of property couldn't dream of. For example, imaging selling your old house and demanding that it's integrity be preserved (so that it can't be improved). You can't do that with physical property, but it's a perfectly valid right for copyright owners.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Alejandro</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2007 06:48:14 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>