<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for Jean-Paul</title><link>http://disqus.com/people/607cfd4a5b41fe6c886c978128b9c03e/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 12:31:08 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Pythoscope: Unit test generation for Python.</title><link>http://pyjesse.disqus.com/pythoscope_unit_test_generation_for_python/#comment-1769154</link><description>Why does it generate two test methods named "test_object_initialization"?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jean-Paul</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 23 Aug 2008 09:29:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: jessenoller.com  &amp;raquo; Blog Archive   &amp;raquo; Find all the proposed pycon talks</title><link>http://pyjesse.disqus.com/jessenollercom_raquo_blog_archive_raquo_find_all_the_proposed_pycon_talks/#comment-3427379</link><description>You have secret powers, Jesse.  I don't think "normal" registrants can view proposals.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jean-Paul</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 23:08:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: multiprocessing.Pool and KeyboardInterrupt</title><link>http://pyjesse.disqus.com/multiprocessingpool_and_keyboardinterrupt/#comment-5012745</link><description>Why doesn't apply_async have a means for receiving notification of errors from the child process?  This isn't just related to C-c, right?  Any exception raised in the child will cause the process to go into an unmanageable state - that seems like a terrible way to deal with errors.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jean-Paul</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 11:29:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: multiprocessing.Pool and KeyboardInterrupt</title><link>http://pyjesse.disqus.com/multiprocessingpool_and_keyboardinterrupt/#comment-5012946</link><description>Great. :)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jean-Paul</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 11:38:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://brizzled.clapper.org/id/88</title><link>http://brizzled.disqus.com/thread_609/#comment-7072057</link><description>I quickly hacked (~3 line diff, but it was definitely a hack) your Twisted web server version to use 3 cores on a 4 core machine (leaving the last to ab).  Performance went from ~1400r/s to ~6000r/s.  I assume the main advantage the Scala version has over the rest is that it's actually exploiting most of the available hardware than any of the Python versions, so this change brings the Twisted web version onto even footing with it. :)  I realize this isn't in the spirit of your "naive approach" servers, but I thought I'd point it out in case you hadn't considered just using more processes instead of switching all of your development to a new language.  This should be easy, since your case seems to involve little or no state shared between requests; lots of Twisted is geared towards the opposite, where it's a bit harder to split things up into different processes.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jean-Paul</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 12:31:08 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>