<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for Arun Kr. Dev</title><link>http://disqus.com/people/5fd2b91dd4d15e48f0b8ea7f8192abfc/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2008 10:14:04 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Future Ships - R/V Aurora&amp;nbsp;Borealis</title><link>http://gcaptain.disqus.com/future_ships_rv_auroranbspborealis/#comment-1351703</link><description>I wonder that twin propellers resulting more possibilities of propeller-ice interactions. Single pod could have been an alternate choice from manufacturers. Of course twin propellers have an advatage of using smaller diamter thus creating more hull aperture.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;How will the vessel be dealing with drifting ice while drilling? Does it mean that the vessel still requires ice management by suitably deploed other ice breakers.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Arun Kr. Dev</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2008 10:00:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Future Ships - R/V Aurora&amp;nbsp;Borealis</title><link>http://gcaptain.disqus.com/future_ships_rv_auroranbspborealis/#comment-1351704</link><description>One more item is that as the number of special personnel on board the vessel will be much more tha 12, the vessel is going to be a special purpose ship (SPS) satisfying IMO Res A 534(13). Please confirm.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Arun Kr. Dev</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2008 10:14:04 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>