<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for johnk</title><link>http://disqus.com/people/5d57d2a73bc62e0816581c8df4786335/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2007 07:10:44 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: N82 vs N95: Flashing in the Dark</title><link>http://simo.disqus.com/n82_vs_n95_flashing_in_the_dark/#comment-1634495</link><description>Sorry to say, but except for the light level, the N82 picture is absolutely crap. Just take a look at the full size picture and you will have to agree.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">johnk</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2007 10:29:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: N82 vs N95: Flashing in the Dark</title><link>http://simo.disqus.com/n82_vs_n95_flashing_in_the_dark/#comment-1634497</link><description>Can we still use the excuse "it's just a mobile"? Carl Zeiss optics, 5mpixels, xenon flash and 5x the price of an ok digicam? With so much focus on the cam part, I think it should perform better.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">johnk</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2007 14:25:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: N82 vs N95: Flashing in the Dark</title><link>http://simo.disqus.com/n82_vs_n95_flashing_in_the_dark/#comment-1634499</link><description>[quote]In pitch black?[/quote] That's what flash are for :)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">johnk</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2007 07:10:44 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>