<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for Anonymous</title><link>http://disqus.com/people/5be86a9e1ea836b11929f0ff0c413d6e/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 07:20:28 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Do you have what it takes to be a founder? A quick quiz</title><link>http://venturebeat.disqus.com/do_you_have_what_it_takes_to_be_a_founder_a_quick_quiz/#comment-21661287</link><description>nice write-up&lt;br&gt;look folks, this isn't a book, just a short commentary by Steve&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;but steve, seriously, you need to resegment the market a bit and when you do that, walk and chew daily &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;:-)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anonymous</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 07:20:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Fox&amp;#8217;s 24 Is Now 22.8</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/fox8217s_24_is_now_228/#comment-21610772</link><description>Where do you think that time goes, then?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;You're saying that if there are 2 minutes of review fluff and one minute of preview, that the 8am show would "start" at 8:03, and then accurately account for commercials.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But now, as you explain, they add an extra minute to  the time when we return from a commercial break, without adding an actual minute of commercials.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;As you say, 3 minutes less per episode.  What occupies that time?  I assume you aren't accusing Fox of warping the fabric of space and time, right? ;)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anonymous</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 30 Jan 2007 16:25:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Fox&amp;#8217;s 24 Is Now 22.8</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/fox8217s_24_is_now_228/#comment-21610770</link><description>They've been doing that for a long time.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Both the "Previously on 24" recap and the "next week on 24" preview must occur within the hour that the show gets, so they have to fudge the clock a bit.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anonymous</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 30 Jan 2007 16:09:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: From Messes To Successes</title><link>http://avc.disqus.com/from_messes_to_successes_69/#comment-378636</link><description>Very timely post. I woke up today feeling overwhelmed with the "messiness" of my company. We've focused on growth to the exclusion of building infrastructure. And while we tripled our revenues last year, now we find ourselves undercapitalized and understaffed, without the proper sales staff and processes to handle all our incoming leads, without enough technical people to handle all our support requests, and releasing buggy products to drive growth and meet customer demand. It's only working because we're solving a real unmet need, so our customers are willing to give us some slack. But that won't last for long. I can already hear the rubber bands holding everything together snapping.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I get the need to hire some operational people to put infrastructure in place. But hiring people requires money. And money requires talking to VCs. And talking to VCs takes time away from the business, causing more of a mess. And it seems VCs want you to have solved all your messes before they invest in you. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;So, while I agree great messes can become great successes, when you're in the morass, how do you raise the money needed to get out without scaring away the only people who can help?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anonymous</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 08:06:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Sandberg leaves. Let's all recite Eric Schmidt's Serenity Prayer.</title><link>http://fakesteve.disqus.com/sandberg_leaves_lets_all_recite_eric_schmidts_serenity_prayer/#comment-204152</link><description>Or, could it be the part of Google's plan to take over Facebook??</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anonymous</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2008 06:01:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 16: State of IronRuby 2009</title><link>http://altnetpodcast.disqus.com/16_state_of_ironruby_2009/#comment-6739835</link><description>Just found your podcasts. Very cool, but you guys really want to improve your sound quality...</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anonymous</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 01 Mar 2009 02:00:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Tune Your Ears To Vocal Talent</title><link>http://cosmictap.disqus.com/tune_your_ears_to_vocal_talent/#comment-1340571</link><description>I got goose bumps and wet myself when she hit that high note</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anonymous</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2007 16:31:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Not That Kind of Libertarian: Puzzles of Children&amp;#8217;s Rights</title><link>http://willwilkinson.disqus.com/not_that_kind_of_libertarian_puzzles_of_children8217s_rights/#comment-3710962</link><description>Eric,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;All children in all countries are equally morally worthy.  But we can try to help children in this country without engaging in a shooting war.  We don't have that kind of flexibility in Darfur, which makes it a much harder problem.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anonymous</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2007 09:00:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: iPhone BlackBerry Storm</title><link>http://uberphones.disqus.com/iphone_blackberry_storm/#comment-6850066</link><description>I've got a Storm.. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I think the platform has potential, but like the ORIGINAL iphone the OS has some bugs to be worked out. Apple has had a year or two to work the bugs out, while RIM has only had 2-3 months.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;When RIM gets their first real OS upgrade out for it, and when more software becomes available, user satisfaction will improve dramatically (..it took google almost 3 months to release a version of google maps for it; just released a couple weeks ago!  ..most other blackberry software has to be updated to handle the changing screen orientation effectively [but there is a 'compatability mode' that can be set / unset for legacy programs).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;As far as one handed usability.. It works fine for me, BUT.. with two hands you can do everything 2-3 times faster.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anonymous</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 17:37:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: One Red Question: What advice would you give to a young graduate starting a tech career? - Red Canary</title><link>http://redcanary.disqus.com/one_red_question_what_advice_would_you_give_to_a_young_graduate_starting_a_tech_career_red_canary/#comment-4004129</link><description>Go back to school, learn something else, and get a job in a different industry.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anonymous</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 08:47:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: What You Need To Know About Amazon SimpleDB</title><link>http://satine.disqus.com/what_you_need_to_know_about_amazon_simpledb/#comment-6392933</link><description>Someone asked, "simpledb will be altenative way of RDBMS, right?"  Yes, it will be the alternative: the alternative for illiterate programmers.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Some people just don't get it.  RDBMSs are based on **set theory** and, as such, support many operations that simpledb requires you to do manually.  RDMSs are to mathematics what simpledb is to basic math skills.  Sure, you can do many things in the world only knowing addition and subtraction, but if you actually knew algebra, then you could do a lot more.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Do you guys really want simpledb because it is actually is a good fit for your application, or are you just scared of learning SQL?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anonymous</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2008 08:52:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: DCIP Closer To D-Cinema Funding</title><link>http://celluloidjunkie.disqus.com/dcip_closer_to_d_cinema_funding/#comment-16519663</link><description>Yes, this may be nothing but spin but it may be all that is needed.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Reading the intent, and how long till the US reaches critical mass with digital cinema, makes we wonder what will happen to the VPF in the rest of the world once they have?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;J</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anonymous</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2009 20:16:39 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>