WhatsNext

• 

  • WhatsNext  *******I THINK THIS IS BAD NEWS FOR NEW START-UPS.******* If any system of which data of the user is shared across multiple sites, would the valuation of those sites using the shared information not be cut by at least 50%? Lets take Facebook for example. I figure their multi-billion dollar valuation is for their ability to reach to millions, and the information they have about all of those users. If then one company, lets take OpenSocial (google) has all that information, they are the true big-wigs. So, for convenience, its great, but for the sites using it, it won’t be as valuable if their looking for an exit-strategy, right? I’m not an economist here, so please let me know if I am way off, but thats how I see it going down.
  • • 6 months ago
    •   Huge: Facebook, Plaxo and Google open up
    •   Mathew's comments
  •   mathewi  I'm not sure you're right, What's Next. I don't think Facebook's valuation is based on the fact that it has somehow trapped its users and all of their data inside its walled-garden network -- otherwise known as the "roach motel" business model. And if that is what it's valuation is based on, then much of it will vanish. I'd like to think that social networks rise or fall based on what they can help you do, or how easy they make it to create a network of friends, rather than how efficiently they lock you in -- although I know there are some big companies who disagree on that.
  •   drBaher  Although Data is very important to any social network, what you do with the data is the real essence of any service, and depending on users’ data for value is not a good business decision, as sooner or later users will move on to better social networks. Plus, I don’t think social networks will open all of their data, just share some of it and allow its users to export them using certain yet-to-be-know standards.
  • • 2 points
    • 2 replies