<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for Brooks Garrett</title><link>http://disqus.com/people/5a2cd40d9691d04ca9b598773fc0665f/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 10:35:29 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: I Am, As of Today, Thoroughly Enthralled With American History</title><link>http://danielrm26.disqus.com/i_am_as_of_today_thoroughly_enthralled_with_american_history/#comment-4358937</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks for the link!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Brooks Garrett</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2008 23:37:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Look What I Just Found In My Access.log</title><link>http://danielrm26.disqus.com/look_what_i_just_found_in_my_accesslog/#comment-4359307</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Sorry, I was bored ;-)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Brooks Garrett</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 17 Aug 2008 10:55:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why America is Screwed [Pic]</title><link>http://danielrm26.disqus.com/why_america_is_screwed_pic/#comment-4359005</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Too many civils was died? Are they alive now? Bah.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Is that a box of happy on one of those screens? I so want my box of happy. . .&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Brooks Garrett</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2008 10:32:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Verdict on iPhone Update 2.0.2</title><link>http://danielrm26.disqus.com/the_verdict_on_iphone_update_202/#comment-4359337</link><description>&lt;p&gt;One word big guy.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Android.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Brooks Garrett</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 09:35:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Information Shadows</title><link>http://danielrm26.disqus.com/information_shadows/#comment-4359335</link><description>&lt;p&gt;By far one of the coolest reads I've seen. Thanks for that.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Brooks Garrett</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 12:02:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Smoke and Flames</title><link>http://danielrm26.disqus.com/smoke_and_flames/#comment-4359369</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Aww, I've been promoted to Buddy status ;-) &lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Thanks for the linkage.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Brooks Garrett</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 24 Aug 2008 00:24:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: What Really Happened in Georgia</title><link>http://danielrm26.disqus.com/what_really_happened_in_georgia/#comment-4359377</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Does anyone else remember the Second World War? The war of Alliances? &lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;So, Georgia instigates Russia, Russia retaliates. Had both sides pushed to full conflict, can we guess which side America would have been on?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Hint: Georgia is the Second largest force in the "Coalition of the Willing". You do the math. Georgia didn't have to worry about how hard Russia "kicks". They knew America was behind them.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Thankfully diplomacy and common sense prevailed.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Brooks Garrett</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 24 Aug 2008 21:54:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Media: &amp;#8220;No Plot Against Obama&amp;#8221;</title><link>http://danielrm26.disqus.com/media_8220no_plot_against_obama8221/#comment-4359398</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://news.sky.com/skynews/Home/World-News/No-Evidence-Of-Assassination-Plot-Barack-Obama-Assassination-Plot/Article/200808415086777?lpos=World%2BNews_0&amp;amp;lid=ARTICLE_15086777_No%2BEvidence%2BOf%2BAssassination%2BPlot%2BBarack%2BObama%2B%2527Assassination%2BPlot%2527%2B" rel="nofollow"&gt;Linkage to an Article&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;One glaring problem here. Was there a "Plot"? Yes. Was it Credible?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Not even close. You have 4 meth heads with one super powerful rifle which was sighted in &lt;em&gt;allegedly&lt;/em&gt; to 750 yds. The problem? That super powerful rifle was a .22lr plinker. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;These guys have had absorbed a few too many fumes.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Brooks Garrett</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 09:40:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A New Take on McCain&amp;#8217;s VP Pick</title><link>http://danielrm26.disqus.com/a_new_take_on_mccain8217s_vp_pick/#comment-4359492</link><description>&lt;p&gt;So picking the guy who called you young and inexperienced and "not ready" for office is so much wiser?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;It is a party pick. He may not have dated her or spent time getting to know her mother, but she does have a strong track record on conservative ideals, is from a region where we want to drill, and is not only a pro-lifer in politics but in life.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;I think she is refreshing in that she not only does what she says and lives what she professes, but also is willing to take on stupidity and corruption head first.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Lastly, WTF does her 17 year old pregnant daughter have to do with anything? &lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Family != Political Leverage.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Brooks Garrett</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 12:42:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Revealing Biases Against Obama</title><link>http://danielrm26.disqus.com/revealing_biases_against_obama/#comment-4359563</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Humorously enough, when I told my boss I would not be voting Obama her reaction was "Because you are a racist."&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Why is it so hard to understand I do not vote Obama because I don't like his energy policy (though improving), his 2A policies (Constitutional Scholar my Bum), or the fact he wishes to take from me (since I can afford it) and give it to those who "need" (not work) for it.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;If I voted for Obama, it would be to simply elect a black man, and that in my opinion WOULD be racist.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Brooks Garrett</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2008 10:35:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Thoughts on the First Debate</title><link>http://danielrm26.disqus.com/thoughts_on_the_first_debate/#comment-4359739</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I saw a different debate. It seemed to me Obama was reaching to speak over McCain, often speaking during McCain's time to correct or "clarify" his position. It left me with a feeling of desperation on Obama's part that he could not wait his turn to rebuke the other Senator.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Brooks Garrett</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 28 Sep 2008 00:39:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Second Debate Sucked</title><link>http://danielrm26.disqus.com/the_second_debate_sucked/#comment-4359880</link><description>&lt;p&gt;wait, What? McCain is responsible for the current economic crisis? I thought it was the Dem. party that pushed the need for mortgages for everyone. No down payment? No problem. Down on your luck? No Problem.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;The over regulation in the first place is what put us here. I also lay blame on the current administration and Congress for not addressing the issue 4 years ago and adjusting dangerous regulations, but to talk about sources we need to go TO the source. That source lies squarely within the left wing agenda to insure everyone gets a nice house, even when they can't afford it.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;From Thoreaux's On The Duty of Civil Disobediance:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;"Governments show thus how successfully men can be imposed upon, even impose on themselves, for their own advantage. It is excellent, we must all allow. Yet this government never of itself furthered any enterprise, but by the alacrity with which it got out of its way. It does not keep the country free. It does not settle the West. It does not educate. The character inherent in the American people has done all that has been accomplished; and it would have done somewhat more, if the government had not sometimes got in its way. For government is an expedient, by which men would fain succeed in letting one another alone; and, as has been said, when it is most expedient, the governed are most let alone by it. Trade and commerce, if they were not made of india-rubber, would never manage to bounce over obstacles which legislators are continually putting in their way; and if one were to judge these men wholly by the effects of their actions and not partly by their intentions, they would deserve to be classed and punished with those mischievious persons who put obstructions on the railroads."&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Brooks Garrett</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 10:34:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Second Debate Sucked</title><link>http://danielrm26.disqus.com/the_second_debate_sucked/#comment-4359879</link><description>&lt;p&gt;In the end, the market will take care of itself, if only those who wish to redistribute wealth and "equalize" the market would stay out of its way.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Point further in case, the "gouging" statute and the current fuel shortage in North GA.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Brooks Garrett</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 10:35:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: I Am, As of Today, Thoroughly Enthralled With American History</title><link>http://drm.disqus.com/i_am_as_of_today_thoroughly_enthralled_with_american_history/#comment-11192055</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks for the link!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Brooks Garrett</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2008 23:37:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Look What I Just Found In My Access.log</title><link>http://drm.disqus.com/look_what_i_just_found_in_my_accesslog/#comment-11198262</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Sorry, I was bored ;-)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Brooks Garrett</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 17 Aug 2008 10:55:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why America is Screwed [Pic]</title><link>http://drm.disqus.com/why_america_is_screwed_pic/#comment-11193549</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Too many civils was died? Are they alive now? Bah.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Is that a box of happy on one of those screens? I so want my box of happy. . .&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Brooks Garrett</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2008 10:32:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Verdict on iPhone Update 2.0.2</title><link>http://drm.disqus.com/the_verdict_on_iphone_update_202/#comment-11199926</link><description>&lt;p&gt;One word big guy.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Android.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Brooks Garrett</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 09:35:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Information Shadows</title><link>http://drm.disqus.com/information_shadows/#comment-11199894</link><description>&lt;p&gt;By far one of the coolest reads I've seen. Thanks for that.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Brooks Garrett</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 12:02:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Smoke and Flames</title><link>http://drm.disqus.com/smoke_and_flames/#comment-11200258</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Aww, I've been promoted to Buddy status ;-) &lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Thanks for the linkage.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Brooks Garrett</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 24 Aug 2008 00:24:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: What Really Happened in Georgia</title><link>http://drm.disqus.com/what_really_happened_in_georgia/#comment-11200510</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Does anyone else remember the Second World War? The war of Alliances? &lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;So, Georgia instigates Russia, Russia retaliates. Had both sides pushed to full conflict, can we guess which side America would have been on?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Hint: Georgia is the Second largest force in the "Coalition of the Willing". You do the math. Georgia didn't have to worry about how hard Russia "kicks". They knew America was behind them.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Thankfully diplomacy and common sense prevailed.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Brooks Garrett</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 24 Aug 2008 21:54:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Media: &amp;#8220;No Plot Against Obama&amp;#8221;</title><link>http://drm.disqus.com/media_8220no_plot_against_obama8221/#comment-11200698</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://news.sky.com/skynews/Home/World-News/No-Evidence-Of-Assassination-Plot-Barack-Obama-Assassination-Plot/Article/200808415086777?lpos=World%2BNews_0&amp;amp;lid=ARTICLE_15086777_No%2BEvidence%2BOf%2BAssassination%2BPlot%2BBarack%2BObama%2B%2527Assassination%2BPlot%2527%2B" rel="nofollow"&gt;Linkage to an Article&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;One glaring problem here. Was there a "Plot"? Yes. Was it Credible?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Not even close. You have 4 meth heads with one super powerful rifle which was sighted in &lt;em&gt;allegedly&lt;/em&gt; to 750 yds. The problem? That super powerful rifle was a .22lr plinker. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;These guys have had absorbed a few too many fumes.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Brooks Garrett</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 09:40:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A New Take on McCain&amp;#8217;s VP Pick</title><link>http://drm.disqus.com/a_new_take_on_mccain8217s_vp_pick/#comment-11201152</link><description>&lt;p&gt;So picking the guy who called you young and inexperienced and "not ready" for office is so much wiser?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;It is a party pick. He may not have dated her or spent time getting to know her mother, but she does have a strong track record on conservative ideals, is from a region where we want to drill, and is not only a pro-lifer in politics but in life.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;I think she is refreshing in that she not only does what she says and lives what she professes, but also is willing to take on stupidity and corruption head first.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Lastly, WTF does her 17 year old pregnant daughter have to do with anything? &lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Family != Political Leverage.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Brooks Garrett</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 12:42:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Revealing Biases Against Obama</title><link>http://drm.disqus.com/revealing_biases_against_obama/#comment-11202749</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Humorously enough, when I told my boss I would not be voting Obama her reaction was "Because you are a racist."&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Why is it so hard to understand I do not vote Obama because I don't like his energy policy (though improving), his 2A policies (Constitutional Scholar my Bum), or the fact he wishes to take from me (since I can afford it) and give it to those who "need" (not work) for it.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;If I voted for Obama, it would be to simply elect a black man, and that in my opinion WOULD be racist.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Brooks Garrett</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2008 10:35:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Thoughts on the First Debate</title><link>http://drm.disqus.com/thoughts_on_the_first_debate/#comment-11204384</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I saw a different debate. It seemed to me Obama was reaching to speak over McCain, often speaking during McCain's time to correct or "clarify" his position. It left me with a feeling of desperation on Obama's part that he could not wait his turn to rebuke the other Senator.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Brooks Garrett</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 28 Sep 2008 00:39:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Second Debate Sucked</title><link>http://drm.disqus.com/the_second_debate_sucked/#comment-11206087</link><description>&lt;p&gt;wait, What? McCain is responsible for the current economic crisis? I thought it was the Dem. party that pushed the need for mortgages for everyone. No down payment? No problem. Down on your luck? No Problem.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;The over regulation in the first place is what put us here. I also lay blame on the current administration and Congress for not addressing the issue 4 years ago and adjusting dangerous regulations, but to talk about sources we need to go TO the source. That source lies squarely within the left wing agenda to insure everyone gets a nice house, even when they can't afford it.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;From Thoreaux's On The Duty of Civil Disobediance:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;"Governments show thus how successfully men can be imposed upon, even impose on themselves, for their own advantage. It is excellent, we must all allow. Yet this government never of itself furthered any enterprise, but by the alacrity with which it got out of its way. It does not keep the country free. It does not settle the West. It does not educate. The character inherent in the American people has done all that has been accomplished; and it would have done somewhat more, if the government had not sometimes got in its way. For government is an expedient, by which men would fain succeed in letting one another alone; and, as has been said, when it is most expedient, the governed are most let alone by it. Trade and commerce, if they were not made of india-rubber, would never manage to bounce over obstacles which legislators are continually putting in their way; and if one were to judge these men wholly by the effects of their actions and not partly by their intentions, they would deserve to be classed and punished with those mischievious persons who put obstructions on the railroads."&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Brooks Garrett</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 10:34:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Second Debate Sucked</title><link>http://drm.disqus.com/the_second_debate_sucked/#comment-11206089</link><description>&lt;p&gt;In the end, the market will take care of itself, if only those who wish to redistribute wealth and "equalize" the market would stay out of its way.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Point further in case, the "gouging" statute and the current fuel shortage in North GA.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Brooks Garrett</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 10:35:29 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>