DISQUS

rather campy for a François Truffaut film. I prefer his autobiographical series

nothing open about twitter. I don't buy twitter or facebook public relations. twitter censors. facebook censors. they all go by the same arbitrary playbook. can't believe people are buying company bullshit. go ahead and test their openness. see how fast they shoot the messenger. open for Holocaust denial and closed for nudes. what a joke you are with your nitpicking on what standard is better.

I'd like to pee on Donald Trump

looks like a social media professional

yup yup... got it too

that is a lot more then 1000 monkeys for a work of Shakespeare

it ain't going to happen. there is no advertising in social media beyond banner ads. Everything else is SPAM. Best bet is product placement in youtubes

Please accept my resignation. I don’t care to belong to any club that will have me as a member.
- Groucho Marx

they all censor!
...but I would place my bets on facebook as far as being the Microsoft of the era
Yahoo should buy them now... People think that they can just design a better interface and people will come. The next interface will be for better Video conversation. Till that comes along "facebook" is king. MySpace has really lost the war... it's amazing that they are moving so slow on this. and "Linkedin" could of been a contender... but is going to become the "WordPerfect" of the generation... everyone says it's better till it's too late because they just weren't. It is going to suck when "facebook" starts censoring everyone.... I look forward to the next generation. We already have a winner. I would love it if "facebook" loses that lawsuit that those Harvard kids are waging. The ideal thing for the industry would be if "facebook" technology went open source... this would keep the feminist sex police from turning free thought into yesterdays news.

What has made me the creative innovator that I am is not my adhesion to the loving hippie tribal culture I grew up around, but rather it is my disassociation with the hypocritical values of the "Woodstock" generation that is my source of inspiration. It allows me to take in the knowledge of the elite and develop it into something more evolved. Great moments of technological innovation rarely come from comfortable communities. Industrial Revolution, Renaissance Italy, Golden Age of Athens, and the development of Hebrew monotheism were all full of strife. The kind of techno idealism you are writing about might sell an article to "Wired" magazine, but it will never change the world. The people who change the world have no ideals. The are scamps... that no one wants to admit they like. The idealistic hippies are the real oppressors. The is nothing more oppressive and cynical then oblivious egalitarianism. When it comes down to it... and no one is watching.... What is the better read? Freud or Jung? The only thing that is exciting that Jung ever wrote was his autobiography... because he looks into the darkness of himself. while Freud looked into the darkness of friction of the world. Everyone likes to go hang out with the wine and cheese crowd and talk about the "collective unconscious" or the bullshit institutional P.R. work of Anna Freud. All this technology is nothing but sexual repression. Never confuse yourself otherwise into being a cyborg that masturbates.