<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for Hiroko</title><link>http://disqus.com/people/57ec6660c3ae5a1509d9c295ee3b4011/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sat, 15 Sep 2007 12:04:16 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: This will not go well . . .</title><link>http://tlf.disqus.com/this_will_not_go_well/#comment-1452081</link><description>So far, Google hasn't "given it away" except when governments have forced them to (and has resisted that in court, where possible).  I think that firmer standards about what governments (and cartels like the RIAA and MPAA) can and cannot &lt;i&gt;force&lt;/i&gt; providers to disclose is a good thing.  The Cato article calls out this threat specifically.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Arguing about whether something is a right or an entitlement is a distinction without a difference, though.  You could call the US Bill of Rights "the bill of entitlements", and it would still be both useful and important.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Hiroko</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 15 Sep 2007 12:04:16 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>