<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for Weave</title><link>http://disqus.com/people/57851af015556119148b684570e63035/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 19:09:30 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: seattle from alki</title><link>http://jonmadison.disqus.com/seattle_from_alki/#comment-1666772</link><description>DAMN, that is a fantastic shot. Nice.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Weave</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2005 22:04:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Finding Users on Twitter by Location</title><link>http://radicalbehavior.disqus.com/finding_users_on_twitter_by_location/#comment-4070525</link><description>Thanks for the tip, Josh! Very handy.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Weave</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 01 Apr 2007 15:07:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Mark Zuckerberg, Sarah Lacy Interview Video</title><link>http://allfacebook.disqus.com/mark_zuckerberg_sarah_lacy_interview_video/#comment-1639690</link><description>1) Understand your audience, regardless of what you think of them. If you have contempt for them, keep it veiled. This group: pretty vocal.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;2) Ask questions, step aside and allow your speaker to engage directly with the audience...even if the speaker is not the most practiced. "Mmm-hmms" and interruptions are unnecessary and detract from what the audience wants to hear. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;3) Remember who the audience is there to see. Leave your own book, TV show, etc., out of the conversation. It wasn't a panel, it was a keynote.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;4) If the audience isn't as professional or mature as you'd like them to be, don't be unprofessional or immature back to them.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;5) Twirling the hair, jokingly threatening to throw water at the keynote, belittling/laughing at the keynote, yelling to someone else in the back for clarification, saying "screw all you guys" to your audience: COMPLETELY UNPROFESSIONAL AND UNBUSINESSWEEK.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Weave</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 19:09:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: MySpace!</title><link>http://mashable.disqus.com/myspace/#comment-5891482</link><description>Lametard is my new favorite word. Thanks, Pete!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Weave</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 27 Mar 2006 16:03:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 2007/01/31/flickr-yahoo/</title><link>http://mashable.disqus.com/thread_848/#comment-5921706</link><description>As an old-skoo' Flickrite, I could give a rat's ass about whether I use my email addy or a Yahoo! addy to log into one of my favorite online communities. I mean, Yahoo! owns the site now...people need to get over that. And your online ID/screenname/whatever doesn't change! &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I'm surprised that such a minor, minor thing gets people's panties in a collective bunch. Perhaps there are more important things to angst over?  Crikey.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Weave</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 01 Feb 2007 18:49:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Marketing is NOT Social Media-Social Media is NOT Marketing</title><link>http://chrisbrogan.disqus.com/marketing_is_not_social_media_social_media_is_not_marketing/#comment-8514420</link><description>Hey, Chris. Great post. As both a classic marketer AND a social media enthusiast, I agree with several of your points. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;One of the attractions of marketers to social media is the fact that, as individuals use social networks to find one another, marketers can use them to find the individuals we want to sell to. But being sold to is NOT why consumers come to social media venues in the first place. Good marketers get this and don't try to get all commercial in these venues...it's like trying to sell Amway products at a neighbor's cocktail party...totally uncool. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I hate Push Marketing tactics as much as the next guy. The brands that act appropriately in the social space will succeed. They'll engage the curious with respect and without self-interest. But if they show up and start shoving intrusions in our faces in our favorite online social haunts, I think it will bite them. Hard.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Weave</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2007 01:51:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Microsoft goes Web 2.0 with Sharepoint</title><link>http://scobleizer.disqus.com/microsoft_goes_web_20_with_sharepoint/#comment-9692281</link><description>Christian: try a hosted Sharepoint service like Sherweb (they've got great reviews - I use them for shared Exchange). &lt;a href="http://www.sherweb.com/sharepoint-hosting" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.sherweb.com/sharepoint-hosting&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Weave</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2007 13:20:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Social Networks Going the Way of Reality TV?</title><link>http://marketingpilgrim.disqus.com/social_networks_going_the_way_of_reality_tv/#comment-9416145</link><description>I agree with Sam: generally speaking we're early adopters and so we're likely more "socially exhausted" than others. The rest of the public will come along and by then I'm sure there will be 1) a financially-driven consolidation amongst venues and 2) an ubiquity to many social enablement tools that deflates the hype and makes them basic "table stakes" for sites to incorporate. Just one example: the Diggesque ranking features popping up everywhere.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And as Sam mentioned, by then we'll be on to the Next Big Thing. :)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Weave</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 21:55:17 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>