Do they belong to you? Claim these comments.
Middlebrow
Is this you? Claim Profile »
2 months ago
in MORE WETLANDS-RELATED PRESS-TELEGRAM-IANA on The District Weekly
Write about the Wetlands not the Press Telegram! I don't read one publication to learn about another - I read a particular publication to learn about, among other things, that publication.
What do you think I am learning about The District Weekly?
What do you think I am learning about The District Weekly?
2 months ago
in GOOD NEWS! PRESS-TELEGRAM FINALLY DISCOVERS CONTROVERSY IN WETLANDS DEAL! on The District Weekly
So you think the reason for a publication to exist is to ride herd on another publication?
Yes, I think that a by-line is important. It helps insure integrity. I just want The District to be the best publication it can be, and this is not the path.
Hey, I have friends that work at The District (and the PT for that matter) so this was directed at them, not you Com_Mentor. So, on your bike now.
Yes, I think that a by-line is important. It helps insure integrity. I just want The District to be the best publication it can be, and this is not the path.
Hey, I have friends that work at The District (and the PT for that matter) so this was directed at them, not you Com_Mentor. So, on your bike now.
2 months ago
in GOOD NEWS! PRESS-TELEGRAM FINALLY DISCOVERS CONTROVERSY IN WETLANDS DEAL! on The District Weekly
I don't care for this. I don't read the District to find out what the Press Telegram is doing wrong. Especially in a story without a by-line.
First of all, it's a little too easy, secondly it is just bad form.
Stay classy you paragons of Journalistic Excellence!
First of all, it's a little too easy, secondly it is just bad form.
Stay classy you paragons of Journalistic Excellence!
1 reply
5 months ago
in MORE ON PRIVATIZING LONG BEACH AIRPORT on The District Weekly
Sorry John, you simply don't understand how airports operate, are leased and funded by airline tenants in the U.S.
Your idea would not have the support of airlines who don't have the financial wherewithal to support this "fantasy." Don't throw a Japanese business model into the mix - it doesn't fly here.
Not to mention the environmental havoc this plan would create.
Wake up John!
Your idea would not have the support of airlines who don't have the financial wherewithal to support this "fantasy." Don't throw a Japanese business model into the mix - it doesn't fly here.
Not to mention the environmental havoc this plan would create.
Wake up John!
1 reply
John_B
Ok, middlebrow. You keep arguing for our limitations and explaining why things can't and won't be done.
I'll keep arguing for our potential and looking for ways to challenge our society to continue to imagine, to achieve and succeed.
At the end of the day, or of the millenium, whether on this topic or in any other area of public policy and human endeavor, we'll see which approach ultimately proves the more successful.
Thanks very much for your input!
I'll keep arguing for our potential and looking for ways to challenge our society to continue to imagine, to achieve and succeed.
At the end of the day, or of the millenium, whether on this topic or in any other area of public policy and human endeavor, we'll see which approach ultimately proves the more successful.
Thanks very much for your input!
5 months ago
in MORE ON PRIVATIZING LONG BEACH AIRPORT on The District Weekly
I was joking. In the current airline economic and general economic environment, this is far from possible. I don't think this would be possible EVER!
Who would pay for this "Popular Science" airport?
Who would pay for this "Popular Science" airport?
1 reply
John_B
With an actively engaged and intelligently informed Electorate, all things are possible, middlebrow. All that's required is that we, just once, stop arguing for our limitations.
There are many funding options for such a facility. Local public/private investments could receive State and Federal grants, tax credits and matching funds.
If Long Beach would, for once, simply get it's fiscal house in order, we would have budget surpluses (rather than persistent deficits) that could jump start such construction.
Once built, such an international airport would quickly begin to pay for itself and, I believe, could easily pay off its own construction costs within, at most, a decade.
This isn't just a "Popular Science" idea, middlebrow. It's a real-world solution to several dilemmas currently facing Long Beach and, indeed, the region.
I would encourage everyone to look deeper, see farther and, instead of always asking "why?" trying "why not?" on for size. Instead of seeing only insurmountable obstacles, let’s start seeing challenges just begging to be overcome if, just once, we would remember how a truly great, innovative and resourceful people we can be.
Just once.
There are many funding options for such a facility. Local public/private investments could receive State and Federal grants, tax credits and matching funds.
If Long Beach would, for once, simply get it's fiscal house in order, we would have budget surpluses (rather than persistent deficits) that could jump start such construction.
Once built, such an international airport would quickly begin to pay for itself and, I believe, could easily pay off its own construction costs within, at most, a decade.
This isn't just a "Popular Science" idea, middlebrow. It's a real-world solution to several dilemmas currently facing Long Beach and, indeed, the region.
I would encourage everyone to look deeper, see farther and, instead of always asking "why?" trying "why not?" on for size. Instead of seeing only insurmountable obstacles, let’s start seeing challenges just begging to be overcome if, just once, we would remember how a truly great, innovative and resourceful people we can be.
Just once.
6 months ago
in MORE ON PRIVATIZING LONG BEACH AIRPORT on The District Weekly
John, would the airport "float" on the water and accept dirigible traffic?
1 reply
John_B
Such an airport would be built on landfill, just as most of our Port, indeed almost everything currently south of Ocean boulevard, currently is.
Such an airport would accept all sorts of aircraft...fixed wing, rotary wing and dirigible, just as our current airport does.
Such an airport would accept all sorts of aircraft...fixed wing, rotary wing and dirigible, just as our current airport does.
6 months ago
in MORE ON PRIVATIZING LONG BEACH AIRPORT on The District Weekly
You waited until the last paragraph, and hid it coming out of a quote, but there it is, you used the word: expansion. You tipped your hand.
"Expansion" is HUSH2 code for any change at the airport.
Like changing it so that the city could keep its' promise to the airlines about the inadequate facilities. Like changing it so that passengers can get something decent to eat at the airport or to take along on their flight. Ot, like changing the city airport so that it's own gate holding room wouldn't violate the city capacity rating.
NOBODY wants to expand the airport. People that use the airport and work at the airport though could use a reasonable facility. That wont expand the airport.
Using the word expansion makes me think that you are using HUSH2 talking points and against being reasonable.
And by the way... how could privatizing make it any worse. It's not like the city has run it well to this point.
"Expansion" is HUSH2 code for any change at the airport.
Like changing it so that the city could keep its' promise to the airlines about the inadequate facilities. Like changing it so that passengers can get something decent to eat at the airport or to take along on their flight. Ot, like changing the city airport so that it's own gate holding room wouldn't violate the city capacity rating.
NOBODY wants to expand the airport. People that use the airport and work at the airport though could use a reasonable facility. That wont expand the airport.
Using the word expansion makes me think that you are using HUSH2 talking points and against being reasonable.
And by the way... how could privatizing make it any worse. It's not like the city has run it well to this point.
7 months ago
in THE CRIME WAVE THAT WASN’T on The District Weekly
Sorry Theo. I'm a fan of much of your work but it seems lately that you (and The District in general) just wait in front of the house for the PT paperboy in the morning.
Just this week we had "PT Weighs In On Memorial Medical Center Reorganization" but no substantial coverage of the incredible Prop 8 demonstration Friday night.
I don't know how you feel, but I am mighty worried about The District Weekly.
Just this week we had "PT Weighs In On Memorial Medical Center Reorganization" but no substantial coverage of the incredible Prop 8 demonstration Friday night.
I don't know how you feel, but I am mighty worried about The District Weekly.
1 reply
Ellen Griley
Middlebrow: Forgive the lag in our Prop 8 demonstration coverage. You're absolutely right. Although we have a piece about it on in the paper this week and on the website now, we should have had one Friday or at the very least Saturday. Thanks for watching out—and believe me, this weekend, when it comes to cracking open another beer during the game or blogging about what I did Friday night or fantastic veggies I just picked up at the new Saturday farmers' market, you'll be on my mind. Not in a creepy way—you know, just, like, reminding me that we don't quite clock out at 5 p.m. Friday.
11 months ago
in IN BUDGET TALKS, CITY DELAYS MAIN LIBRARY CLOSURE | The District Weekly on The District Weekly
Close and sell the Art Museum. It is more important to have a Main Library.
1 year ago
in LAURA RICHARDSON SHAKIN’ HER MONEYMAKER | The District Weekly on The District Weekly
It's bad enough that loyal dems have to "swallow hard" and vote for Richardson - but then to find out that her ambition has clouded her judgment and... well, she doesn't pay her bills. How should and how can we "get over this already?"
Sanchez is wrong about District staff and wrong about Richardson.
Sanchez is wrong about District staff and wrong about Richardson.
1 year ago
in HAPPY BIRTHDAY, ISRAEL | The District Weekly on The District Weekly
Why the celebration of the inauspicious 60th anniversary? Is Israel now run by the Walt Disney Company?
1 year ago
in PORT ‘O LONG BEACH: PHOTOGRAPHERS GO HOME! | The District Weekly on The District Weekly
There seems to be a lot of inexplicable Photographic Restictions here in Big Town.
I've seen people being asked not to take photos at the Long Beach World Trade Center courtyard and the Pike. An office building and a shopping center?!? Welcome to North Korea!
If no one takes pictures at the Pike, or shops or eats there, will there be any proof that it actually existed? Hopefully not.
I've seen people being asked not to take photos at the Long Beach World Trade Center courtyard and the Pike. An office building and a shopping center?!? Welcome to North Korea!
If no one takes pictures at the Pike, or shops or eats there, will there be any proof that it actually existed? Hopefully not.
1 year ago
in “SOMEWHERE IN TIME” | The District Weekly on The District Weekly
Gaffney will be sorely missed. Even from the afterlife he was responsible for one of the best local music shows in years.
1 year ago
in CHRIS GAFFNEY, R.I.P. | The District Weekly on The District Weekly
Watch for a celebration of Chris Gaffney's life and music at The Cellar on April 30. Call the club for details.
1 year ago
in PABST BEER PRICE FALLS IN CELLAR | The District Weekly on The District Weekly
While the McDougal piece in the Times was certainly on target and insightful, I think even Dennis would agree that praise of that work should never get in the way of honnoring Pilsner Heroics of the type Mr. de Boom is engaged in.
Shall we lose the local newspaper and not have affordable beer with which to mourn its passing? Nay!
Shall we lose the local newspaper and not have affordable beer with which to mourn its passing? Nay!
1 year ago
in LIVE REV: PAPERPLANES @ PROSP + MORE | The District Weekly on The District Weekly
Love de Boom, but this is not a review.
1 year ago
in LAST NIGHT’S CAR CRASH AT ARMORY PARK A NOT-ALL-THAT-AMAZING COINCIDENCE | The District Weekly on The District Weekly
DeBoom is DaBomb! Nice work!!!
1 year ago
in DELONG, DANA (AND THEIR CONSTITUENTS) UNREPRESENTED AT BREAKWATER FORUM | The District Weekly on The District Weekly
It's too bad this wasn't posted until 7:55 Saturday night. This would have been extremely heckle-worthy at the Belmont Parade.
1 year ago
in SO LONG, DELONG: NEW WEBSITE ADVOCATES RECALLING 3RD DISTRICT COUNCILMAN | The District Weekly on The District Weekly
I response to "In the approach path to LGB:" Spend the time to study the Airport Ordinance. The council can't overturn the ordinance.
There is no effort to "expand" the airport.
If you want to recall DeLong fine - but stiring up the airport paranoia isn't going to help your cause with reasonable people.
There is no effort to "expand" the airport.
If you want to recall DeLong fine - but stiring up the airport paranoia isn't going to help your cause with reasonable people.
Why do you need a by-line?
Why did you feel compelled to read this story, even though it did not have a by-line, especially since it did not have a by-line?
IN MY OPIN, I believe the statement about the Telegram was only in regards to a largely circulated newspaper and it's decision to OMIT potentially important, quickly developing news stories from the paper. This prevents a large portion of Long Beach (those purchasing the Telegram, and using it as their ONLY local news source) from being apprised of, and following those events.
It it easy?
I, personally think it is important.
Paragons of Journalistic Excellence?
I'm happy to keep their company, and thank you, for checking in at an alternative publication. Keep up the good work.
Com Mentor.