http://disqus.com/people/56e3185e012e7ed9672de42b614ad898/enTue, 30 Sep 2008 00:57:55 -0000http://coloradoindependent.disqus.com/meet_colorado8217s_anti_union_8216clean_team8217/#comment-2745346After reading this piece, I looked on the Secretary of State's campaign finance tracker and Clean Government Colorado, Yes on 54 campaign has posted their donors as required by law. <br><br>Furthermore, why is the Yes on 54 amendment considered anti-union? As a contractor who has seen first-hand the lies, corruption, and deception that goes on in the no-bid contracting process, why don't you do a little research on how business is currently being conducted on the inside instead of carrying the water for Jess Knox and Protect Colorado's Future.<br><br>You are just glossing over the shady backroom deals that these unions and corruption government contractors are arranging with legislators while fleecing the taxpayers who foot the bill for the contract and the payback contribution by "cost overruns". <br><br>Yes on 54 has it right. We need transparency and we need it now. I encourage to visit their website (<a href="http://cleangovernmentcolorado.com" rel="nofollow">http://cleangovernmentcolorado.com</a>) to get the facts for yourself and vote Yes on 54!MikeTue, 30 Sep 2008 00:57:55 -0000