<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for Dave</title><link>http://disqus.com/people/55906378404ffc0cc26e944edf185bd1/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sun, 30 Aug 2009 22:00:48 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Google and the Me2 revolution</title><link>http://mathewingram.disqus.com/google_and_the_me2_revolution/#comment-1292035</link><description>This is a valid point, but it's based on the assumption people actually care enough to take the time to reality check ads. I admit I only read this post and not the whole article, because I just don't have the time, but this inaction on my part proves the point people are just too busy most of the time and that ads which quickly convey important info, no matter the medium, will always add value.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dave</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2006 17:58:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Mickey Mouse punches Steve Jobs in the kidney with TiVo deal</title><link>http://venturebeat.disqus.com/mickey_mouse_punches_steve_jobs_in_the_kidney_with_tivo_deal/#comment-543535</link><description>There's no way to be certain, but the result of this deal could be highly beneficial to both Jobs and Apple.  First off, it's more money for Jobs, but more to the point, it's promotes the whole niche category of online movie downloading by making video content more consistently available to consumers (i.e. easier for the moms of geeks to use.)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Imagine if a consumer couldn't rely on finding The Matrix at Blockbuster, Hollywood Video, or any other movie rental spot - most would likely just not bother going to any stores at all and seek out alternatives. Avoiding this scenario for online video is definetely in Jobs' interest and the interest of many other people.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The long term competitive advantage is not in content availability, but rather in the ease of use - something I'm betting Jobs feels pretty comfortable with.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dave</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 14:46:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Ning 2.0 launches: build your own social network</title><link>http://scobleizer.disqus.com/ning_20_launches_build_your_own_social_network/#comment-9671989</link><description>Watching this interview literally brought tears to my eyes thinking about the possibilities Ning can enable.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dave</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2007 15:22:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Bernhard Wilhelm x Mykita shades</title><link>http://flylyf.disqus.com/bernhard_wilhelm_x_mykita_shades/#comment-11114029</link><description>Purchase link?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dave</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 13:45:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Maptor: Because The Future Don&amp;#8217;t Need No Stinkin&amp;#8217; Maps!</title><link>http://flylyf.disqus.com/maptor_because_the_future_don8217t_need_no_stinkin8217_maps/#comment-15624073</link><description>Assuming this worked as well as portrayed, I don't see how this is significantly better than an iPhone and why anyone would really want to carry around another device. And for the 3 people that *really* need the projector, it seems an iPhone/mobile accessory that can project more than just maps would be the smart move.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dave</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 30 Aug 2009 22:00:48 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>