<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for John</title><link>http://disqus.com/people/54b75f6fbf4434162bfcda6b0cb9b86b/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 10:41:00 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Enso</title><link>http://justsayinmorewords.disqus.com/enso/#comment-2139706</link><description>I'll give it a look. I'm not necessarily interested in a more powerful utility, just something with the elegance of Enso with some slight tweaks. But I'll try out ActiveWords and see if it fits my needs.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2007 20:40:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Enso</title><link>http://justsayinmorewords.disqus.com/enso/#comment-2139707</link><description>I watched the demo videos and I'm not impressed with ActiveWords at all. Buzz, if you honestly think your programs have the same audience, you're sorely mistaken. Enso is elegant and straightforward. ActiveWords is straightforward and maybe more powerful, but in my opinion, unnecessarily so. Enso : Mac :: ActiveWords : PC is the best way I can describe it.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2007 20:50:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Slightly more dynamic ORDER BY in SQL Server 2005</title><link>http://justsayinmorewords.disqus.com/slightly_more_dynamic_order_by_in_sql_server_2005/#comment-2139959</link><description>I like it Lamprey!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2007 15:13:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: iPhone Plan Is a Ripoff</title><link>http://justsayinmorewords.disqus.com/iphone_plan_is_a_ripoff/#comment-2139996</link><description>I guess I wasn't really trying to bash the iPhone so much as point out that I think people are going to be very dissapointed with the device with inadequate and overpriced service options. T-Mobile's unlimited data/sms plan MAKES the Sidekick. The Sidekick isn't nearly as useful without the plan. For the iPhone to achieve success outside the tech-savvy and fanboys, I think it needs better a better service plan.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2007 13:06:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Enso</title><link>http://justsayinmorewords.disqus.com/enso/#comment-2139709</link><description>Hi Ryan...I wrote this post before they enabled sticky keys. I tried using it with sticky keys too and it still didn't work for me (see &lt;a href="http://john-sheehan.com/blog/index.php/enso-revisited/" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://john-sheehan.com/blog/index.php/enso-rev...&lt;/a&gt;). Not saying its a bad product, just not for me.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 15:12:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Slightly more dynamic ORDER BY in SQL Server 2005</title><link>http://justsayinmorewords.disqus.com/slightly_more_dynamic_order_by_in_sql_server_2005/#comment-2139963</link><description>Hi Ken,&lt;br&gt;I kind of thought that would be the case for larger queries. I'm only using this method on a query for under 100 rows so I haven't run into any performance issues yet.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 19 Jul 2007 10:02:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Someone please defend Visual SourceSafe</title><link>http://justsayinmorewords.disqus.com/someone_please_defend_visual_sourcesafe/#comment-2140010</link><description>Oh, I'm not leaving. The company is great and we will eventually switch to SVN. I'm just looking for things that make VSS more tolerable.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 30 Jul 2007 18:39:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Free Visual Studio Add-in: SonicFileFinder</title><link>http://justsayinmorewords.disqus.com/free_visual_studio_add_in_sonicfilefinder/#comment-2139837</link><description>Great tip!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2007 15:54:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: VS2005 &amp;#8216;prop&amp;#8217; C# Code Snippet in VS2008</title><link>http://justsayinmorewords.disqus.com/vs2005_8216prop8217_c_code_snippet_in_vs2008/#comment-2140057</link><description>For default values. For instance, if I have a string property that should always have a default, I can't do that with automatic props.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 00:00:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Internet Explorer 8 Beta 1 - First Impressions</title><link>http://justsayinmorewords.disqus.com/internet_explorer_8_beta_1_first_impressions/#comment-2140075</link><description>The phishing attacks will adapt to it so in the long run I don't see it as helpful. My bank for instance has nothing with their name in the URL for their online banking. How is highlighting the domain going to help in that case?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 21:49:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Visual Studio 2008: First (Bad) Impressions</title><link>http://justsayinmorewords.disqus.com/visual_studio_2008_first_bad_impressions/#comment-2140039</link><description>Fredrik, that was fixed in the VS2008 Hotfix. &lt;a href="http://weblogs.asp.net/scottgu/archive/2008/02/08/vs-2008-web-development-hot-fix-roll-up-available.aspx" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://weblogs.asp.net/scottgu/archive/2008/02/...&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 03:45:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Stupid Visual Studio Trick, Part 2</title><link>http://justsayinmorewords.disqus.com/stupid_visual_studio_trick_part_2/#comment-2140033</link><description>Since writing this tip, I've started to put some of the more common items I use on that toolbar. VisualSVN commands, SubSonic external tool item, etc. It's becoming even more handy all the time.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 15:29:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: VS2005 &amp;#8216;prop&amp;#8217; C# Code Snippet in VS2008</title><link>http://justsayinmorewords.disqus.com/vs2005_8216prop8217_c_code_snippet_in_vs2008/#comment-2140066</link><description>Best I can tell from the C# Code Snippet docs, you cannot transform the backing field name into the property name (or vice versa). There's very basic support for functions, and none of them cover this case.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 10:41:00 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>