<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for Garrett</title><link>http://disqus.com/people/5450f56b96fe0435848d7524c2aba3d9/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 23:48:20 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: http://www.zunephilippines.com/2006/12/zune-wallpapers.html</title><link>http://zuneph.disqus.com/httpwwwzunephilippinescom200612zune_wallpapershtml/#comment-22429373</link><description>I have a site with a devoted page for wallpapers, I was hoping to use these there. I wouldn&amp;#39;t charge for them, it&amp;#39;s all completely free.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Hope you could check it out.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;http://sites.google.com/site/zunebrew/Home</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Garrett</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 12 Jul 2009 00:10:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://igorandandre.blogspot.com/2008/06/tonight.html</title><link>http://igorandre.disqus.com/httpigorandandreblogspotcom200806tonighthtml/#comment-21225210</link><description>Dan, your stuff is looking amazing. Keep it up. Miss you and your brother.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Garrett</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 14 Jun 2008 07:46:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: New Jose Mourinho Video on Setanta Sports</title><link>http://epltalk.disqus.com/new_jose_mourinho_video_on_setanta_sports/#comment-2203540</link><description>The segment with "Nelson" was hysterical... You Tuuuube.  Ha-Ha.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Garrett</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2008 08:27:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Instant Indie Classic: Picaresque</title><link>http://consequenceofsound.disqus.com/instant_indie_classic_picaresque/#comment-2870532</link><description>yo jon nice work.  I need to check out the decemberists and you've given me the motivation to actually do it.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;good work my friend&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;party cheetos 4 lyfe</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Garrett</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 29 Mar 2008 14:50:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Howard Roark</title><link>http://captainjacksadventures.disqus.com/howard_roark/#comment-2621752</link><description>I loved all of Ayn Rand's books, if you haven't read Atlas Shrugged pick it up today, it is a long but definitely amazing read, even more mind blowing than the fountainhead.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Garrett</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 14 Aug 2007 13:45:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Architectural Bliss in Manhattan</title><link>http://boramag.disqus.com/architectural_bliss_in_manhattan/#comment-3582181</link><description>Seems like the jenga game.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Garrett</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 20 Sep 2008 12:41:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A Whopping 1.5% OF Mcdonalds’ Locations Will Dim Their Golden Arches For An Earth Hour</title><link>http://treehuggerdev.disqus.com/a_whopping_15_of_mcdonalds_locations_will_dim_their_golden_arches_for_an_earth_hour/#comment-17186864</link><description>&lt;p&gt;That's .0114% of the year.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;When using cynicism, it helps drive your point home if you don't make simple mathematical errors.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Garrett</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 28 Mar 2009 23:19:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Enterprise 2.0 May be Fine for the Business, But What About the IT Department?</title><link>http://andrewmcafee.disqus.com/enterprise_20_may_be_fine_for_the_business_but_what_about_the_it_department/#comment-5487163</link><description>I think there are a couple issues at work here.  First, many IT executives do not understand Web 2.0 tools.  I was at an event this week of senior IT executives and none of the people I spoke to were fully using social networking sites.  Some had used LinkedIn and then made their judgments about social networking based on that limited experience.  We are only at the beginning of the development of these tools and it is unfair to make judgments based on one vendor's platform or the current state of the platform.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Second, IT needs to realize that workers are using Web 2.0 tools in their daily life and will come to demand these tools at work.  Much like workers have demanded IM they will also demand social networking.  In many cases this is driven by younger workers.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It is about time that IT realizes that technology is changing faster than ever before.  It makes no sense to stand in the way of change but rather IT departments should be working to proactively understand new technologies and find the best way to standardize and manage them in the organization.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Garrett</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2007 16:05:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Wear the Fox Hat</title><link>http://drbethsnow.disqus.com/wear_the_fox_hat/#comment-12017393</link><description>See I'm the opposite, for example you are pretty but if you were wearing the fox hat then I would pretty much blow a load in my pants.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Garrett</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 03 Mar 2007 15:46:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A test of my will</title><link>http://drbethsnow.disqus.com/a_test_of_my_will/#comment-12017399</link><description>You should be a model on the Price is Right.  Lovely and all of that.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Garrett</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 04 Mar 2007 13:14:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Tropicana.</title><link>http://linttray.disqus.com/tropicana/#comment-16193005</link><description>Interesting.  I bought this OJ about a week ago to make mimosas for Easter sunday.   I saw the 100% Orange Juice and just grabbed it, I didnt even realize it was Tropicana (i'm not brand loyal when it comes to OJ...im just not).  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Anyway, a few days later i noticed the cap was a little orange slice and i thought that was a nice touch, a few seconds later i realized it was Tropicana.   &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Maybe consumers people just couldnt find the old Tropicana picture with the stipped straw and grabbed the closest thing (Minute Maid).</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Garrett</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 16:37:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Howard Roark</title><link>http://captainjacksadventures.disqus.com/howard_roark_66/#comment-16233345</link><description>I loved all of Ayn Rand's books, if you haven't read Atlas Shrugged pick it up today, it is a long but definitely amazing read, even more mind blowing than the fountainhead.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Garrett</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 14 Aug 2007 13:45:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The 6 Ugliest Eco-Cars: Because Green Isn&amp;apos;t Always Pretty</title><link>http://treehuggerdev.disqus.com/the_6_ugliest_eco_cars_because_green_isnapost_always_pretty/#comment-17175334</link><description>&lt;p&gt;That's SIX cars.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;And they have yet to make another production car with a coefficient of drag as low as the EV1.  Plus it was released in 1996.  &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Garrett</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 00:58:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: World&amp;apos;s First Solar Powered Autonomous Snow Plow</title><link>http://treehuggerdev.disqus.com/worldaposs_first_solar_powered_autonomous_snow_plow/#comment-17175457</link><description>&lt;p&gt;This looks like it'd work up to about an inch of snow.  &lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;And if you've only got an inch of snow, do you really need a robot to scoop it for you?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Garrett</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 02:41:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Microwaves in the Green Kitchen: Efficient Cooking or Weird Science?</title><link>http://treehuggerdev.disqus.com/microwaves_in_the_green_kitchen_efficient_cooking_or_weird_science/#comment-17175833</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Microwaves actually are less energetic than infrared radiation, so are even more harmless.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Garrett</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 21:41:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Think Bottled Water is Bad, Could Bottled Orange Juice Be Even Worse?</title><link>http://treehuggerdev.disqus.com/think_bottled_water_is_bad_could_bottled_orange_juice_be_even_worse/#comment-17175939</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Don't scare people off of frozen concentrated juice.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Dealing with frozen juice reduces spoilage - How much energy does that save? -  and transportation costs (and CO2 output).  &lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;It still uses more energy, but not as much as reconstituted juice, which isn't even mentioned here.  Most of the juice sold in the world is reconstituted, so that issue should be the biggest target for reducing CO2, not frozen concentrate.  &lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Read Slate's article on the matter -- at least they don''t compare it to water --&lt;br  /&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.slate.com/id/2184700/" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.slate.com/id/2184700/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br  /&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Garrett</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 22:12:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Tata Nano, &amp;quot;The People&amp;apos;s Car,&amp;quot; Launches in India</title><link>http://treehuggerdev.disqus.com/the_tata_nano_quotthe_peopleaposs_carquot_launches_in_india/#comment-17185970</link><description>&lt;p&gt;That's going to be 133500 rupees after they tack on a $670 transportation and processing fee American-style.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Garrett</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 01:16:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Another Way To Hide The Bed: Put It In A Box</title><link>http://treehuggerdev.disqus.com/another_way_to_hide_the_bed_put_it_in_a_box/#comment-17188873</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Anyone else confused on the whereabouts of the kitchen?  They have one pic of the counter, but it shows up in no other pictures.  All I see in the other pics is the table or "dining" area, but no kitchen.  Unless it's in the same room as the toilet?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Garrett</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 14:35:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Another Way To Hide The Bed: Put It In A Box</title><link>http://treehuggerdev.disqus.com/another_way_to_hide_the_bed_put_it_in_a_box/#comment-17188874</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Nevermind -- found it.  &lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;It's kinda sad it took me that long.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Still seems with that tall of ceilings they're far from utilizing the space.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Garrett</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 14:39:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Would You Travel 20 Light Years for a Habitable Planet if Earth Gets Too Warm?</title><link>http://treehuggerdev.disqus.com/would_you_travel_20_light_years_for_a_habitable_planet_if_earth_gets_too_warm/#comment-17190744</link><description>&lt;p&gt;So far, the fastest man-made object, Helios 2, is said to have traveled 153,800 mph.  That's .023% of the speed of light.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;20 light-years/.023= about 87000 years.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Would You Travel 87,000 Years for a Habitable Planet if Earth Gets Too Warm?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Garrett</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 14:34:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Swine Flu Reveals: What&amp;apos;s Bad for the Environment is Bad for Human Health</title><link>http://treehuggerdev.disqus.com/swine_flu_reveals_whataposs_bad_for_the_environment_is_bad_for_human_health/#comment-17191620</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Fear-monger much?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;From the WHO (World Health Organization)  28 April 2009--The situation continues to evolve rapidly. As of 19:15 GMT, 28 April 2009, seven countries have officially reported cases of swine influenza A/H1N1 infection. The United States Government has reported 64 laboratory confirmed human cases, with no deaths. Mexico has reported 26 confirmed human cases of infection including seven deaths.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;The following countries have reported laboratory confirmed cases with no deaths - Canada (6), New Zealand (3), the United Kingdom (2), Israel (2) and Spain (2).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;THAT"S SEVEN CONFIRMED DEATHS.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;SEVEN.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;NOT 150.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;I understand that's not the point of your article, but to be so grossly wrong on something so easily looked up from a reputable source casts some serious doubt over any other "facts" you present.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Garrett</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 23:01:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Could You Live Without A Computer at Home?</title><link>http://treehuggerdev.disqus.com/could_you_live_without_a_computer_at_home/#comment-17191694</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Why is there not a simple "Yes I could" answer?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Your answers are no, I already do, and maybe.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Garrett</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 12:20:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Metal Roof Saves Money for Grandma</title><link>http://treehuggerdev.disqus.com/metal_roof_saves_money_for_grandma/#comment-17191831</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Metal roofs are generally a bad idea in areas that get hail.  I'll be surprised if her insurance company will replace it when it gets dented by minor hail.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Garrett</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 19:16:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Truth Behind Swine Flu: Have Cheap Drugs &amp;amp; Greed Created a Pandemic?</title><link>http://treehuggerdev.disqus.com/the_truth_behind_swine_flu_have_cheap_drugs_amp_greed_created_a_pandemic/#comment-17191898</link><description>&lt;p&gt;To answer Carol and attack your sensationalist article:  &lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Swine flu is named so because it was originally discovered affecting pigs, and that was 75 years ago.  &lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;So are you talking about the questionable agribusiness practices of 1934 in this article?  Before even penicillin was mass-produced?  And as noted above, that wouldn't have anything to do with this VIRUS anyway.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Get some new writers, or lose some old readers.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Garrett</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 15:27:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Olestra the &amp;quot;Anal Leakage&amp;quot; Fat Gets Alternative Life As Green Replacement for VOCs</title><link>http://treehuggerdev.disqus.com/olestra_the_quotanal_leakagequot_fat_gets_alternative_life_as_green_replacement_for_vocs/#comment-17191945</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Olesta-like molecules ≠ Olestra&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Garrett</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 15:36:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Happy May Day, Or If In America, Happy Loyalty Day</title><link>http://treehuggerdev.disqus.com/happy_may_day_or_if_in_america_happy_loyalty_day/#comment-17192127</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Happy Mission Accomplished Day!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Garrett</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2009 16:02:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: One Glass of Orange Juice = 1,050 Google Searches</title><link>http://treehuggerdev.disqus.com/one_glass_of_orange_juice_1050_google_searches/#comment-17193789</link><description>&lt;p&gt;If it wasn't for incredibly ridiculous articles being written about the absurdly-high CO2 emissions of a single search query they wouldn't need to publish this.  See here: &lt;a href="http://www.treehugger.com/files/2009/01/google-global-warming-co2.php" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.treehugger.com/files/2009/01/google-global-warming-co2.php&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Google's on the defensive because people are idiots and believe anything they read then type up an article about it.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;You have no grounds to be snide, Brian.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Garrett</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 01:13:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Awesome! Abandoned Railroad Gets Converted in Biking and Walking Path in Detroit</title><link>http://treehuggerdev.disqus.com/awesome_abandoned_railroad_gets_converted_in_biking_and_walking_path_in_detroit/#comment-17194276</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Looked better before.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Garrett</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 14:32:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Buying Frozen Veggies Versus Canned: Which is Greener?</title><link>http://treehuggerdev.disqus.com/buying_frozen_veggies_versus_canned_which_is_greener/#comment-17196141</link><description>&lt;p&gt;A can measures by volume, 16 ounces (~450g) corn and water.  A bag of frozen corn, 16 ounces, is by weight.  That's more corn in a bag than in a can, so your comparisons need to be adjusted considering the weight of water in a can.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Also, everyone's freezer is running anyway whether empty or filled with corn, so that should be taken into consideration.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Garrett</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 14:52:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Four Brands of Organic Booze To Get Your Summer Party Started</title><link>http://treehuggerdev.disqus.com/four_brands_of_organic_booze_to_get_your_summer_party_started/#comment-17196194</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I think with products that are distilled -- most several times -- the benefits of going organic are minimized. It makes the cost-to-benefit ratio higher, so without these being priced very closely with conventional competitors, I couldn't personally justify the added cost.  &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Garrett</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 14:59:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Team Achieves 110 MPG Average In Prius</title><link>http://treehuggercomments.disqus.com/team_achieves_110_mpg_average_in_prius/#comment-17451095</link><description>&lt;p&gt;that means they were averaging less than 30 mph.  not practical unless you live in a major city.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Garrett</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2008 09:45:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: New High for Bottled Water</title><link>http://treehuggercomments.disqus.com/new_high_for_bottled_water/#comment-17453425</link><description>&lt;p&gt;"Female readers should be proud of Treehugger for not gratuitously using pictures of scantily dressed female bodybuilders from the Oxyshot website."&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Why should just the female members be proud?  Isn't changing the face of advertising to be less objectifying something we should all strive for?  Should it only be women's responsibility?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Garrett</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 19 Sep 2005 10:51:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Zapping Trash With Plasma Produces Clean Energy and Fuel</title><link>http://treehuggercomments.disqus.com/zapping_trash_with_plasma_produces_clean_energy_and_fuel/#comment-17497197</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Huh, I thought this sounded kinda familiar:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;From the Wikipedia entry for "Flux capacitor"&lt;br  /&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;br  /&gt;&lt;br&gt;The Mr. Fusion Home Energy Reactor is the name of a fictional power source used by the DeLorean time machine in the Back to the Future trilogy. It can be seen towards the end of Back to the Future when "Doc" Emmett Brown pulls into the McFlys' driveway after a trip to the year 2015, and is an obvious parody of Mr. Coffee machines, which were very popular at the time of filming.&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;b&gt;The Mr. Fusion Home Energy Reactor converts household waste to power the time machine's flux capacitor and time circuits using nuclear fusion. &lt;/b&gt;(It is thought that this is cold fusion.) In the film, Mr. Fusion allows the DeLorean time machine to generate the required 1.21 gigawatts to travel through the space-time continuum. The energy produced by Mr. Fusion replaces plutonium as the primary power source of the DeLorean's time travel and flight capabilities.&lt;br  /&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;2015 is just around the corner.  Y'all think we could be powering our DeLoreans with these by then?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Garrett</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 24 Feb 2007 00:48:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: World's Biggest Wind Power Plan</title><link>http://treehuggercomments.disqus.com/worlds_biggest_wind_power_plan/#comment-17506372</link><description>&lt;p&gt;On the comment of the 1 trillion for IRAQ also being enough to build enough wind turbines to power the whole US... I believe I read somewhere that 1 trillion is also the amount it would cost to build a 10 square mile solar array in arizona that would power the entire US.. at current, semi-crappy PV technology. And we wouldn't even mess up wind patterns. If only we had the backing of the military industrial complex...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Garrett</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2007 12:01:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Halifax to Vancouver in a Smart Car</title><link>http://treehuggercomments.disqus.com/halifax_to_vancouver_in_a_smart_car/#comment-17512681</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Dear god, if you're all so savvy on the mileage of your VW diesels, why don't you realize that's less than the Smart diesel, and what the story involves is a gasoline.&lt;br  /&gt;&lt;br&gt;Learn some math, get over yourselves, read the stats again.. better yet: &lt;a href="http://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/bestworst.shtml%3Cbr" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/bestworst.shtml&amp;lt;br&lt;/a&gt;  /&amp;gt;&lt;br&gt;and keep it down, we heard you, and you're both wrong and arrogant.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Garrett</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 15:21:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Forest Ethics&amp;apos; &amp;quot;Naughty and Nice&amp;quot; List of  Treekillers</title><link>http://treehuggercomments.disqus.com/forest_ethicsapos_quotnaughty_and_nicequot_list_of_treekillers/#comment-17533388</link><description>&lt;p&gt;My fiance and I have actually had quite a bit of trouble with Patagonia's catalog service.  We're both ski instructors so we receive a special discount from Patagonia (called a pro-deal).  As we live together, we thought it'd be nice to save paper and opt to only receive one catalog.  The problem is, you cannot join the pro program without signing up for the catalog.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;We also happen to live near a Patagonia outlet store.  We'd like to receive email announcements about their sales.  You cannot receive email announcements unless you sign up for the *regular* Patagonia catalog.  But since we already receive the pro catalog we don't want the regular catalog (they're pretty much identical except for a little slip of paper inserted into the pro catalog).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Due to Patagonia's poorly designed software system (customer tracking system) we'd need to sign up for four catalogs in order to receive all of the information and benefits.  No matter how much recycled paper you use the catalog this is still a stupid waste of resources.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Garrett</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2007 20:27:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Survey: Should Cyclists Be Allowed to Go Through Stop Signs?</title><link>http://treehuggercomments.disqus.com/survey_should_cyclists_be_allowed_to_go_through_stop_signs/#comment-17571126</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Since I started commuting more often by bicycle, I've been considering this question lately.  My conclusion is that if bicycles want to be treated as vehicles, with the right to ride on street without danger from cars, then they should be subject to all of the same traffic laws as the other vehicles on the road.  This includes licensing and registration (while cyclists don't impact the road way as much as cars, those roads don't get paved &amp; maintained for free).  Fees don't need to be as high for cyclists and there should be exemptions for kids on bike paths or residential streets.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;If cyclists want to be treated as vehicles on the road then they need to act like it.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Garrett</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 12 Jul 2008 00:36:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 5 Ways the NYT Science Columnist Distorts the Facts</title><link>http://treehuggercomments.disqus.com/5_ways_the_nyt_science_columnist_distorts_the_facts/#comment-17575142</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Oh huh, I just realized that the y-axis on the chart up top is in Gal/mile.  That's kinda an odd unit to use.  When I first glanced at it, it looked like it said that driving with the windows up and no AC was the least efficient.  &lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;As is the choice of kph instead of mph for the x-axis.  Yes, I realize that most of the world goes by kph but to combine "gallons per mile" with kilometers is a bit strange.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Garrett</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 01:41:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Enforcing Traffic Fines for Idling</title><link>http://treehuggercomments.disqus.com/enforcing_traffic_fines_for_idling/#comment-17582968</link><description>&lt;p&gt;California has additional restrictions on idling for on and off-road heavy diesel vehicles.  This is to reduce the amount of diesel particulate matter (linked to asthma, cancer, global warming, heart disease, etc) and nitrogen oxide (one of the components of smog)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;On-road heavy diesel vehicles include things like school buses, garbage trucks, and semi-trucks.  If I recall correctly, school buses are not allowed to idle anywhere there are children present, garbage trucks are not allowed to idle in residential areas and semi-trucks are not allowed to idle for more than 5 minutes except in a few limited circumstances (for example, queueing to receive a load, operating a power take off [PTO], etc).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Off-road heavy diesel vehicles include things like construction equipment (loaders, excavators, etc) and the vehicles that move cargo containers around ship yards.  These vehicles are limited to 5 minutes of idling except in limited circumstances.  Unfortunately, I don't believe these rules apply to agricultural or logging operations.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;California is also working on or has already passed laws regulating locomotive and ship idling.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Most of these laws are fairly new and are not being heavily enforced.  The California Air Resource Board has a pretty limited enforcement staff but they say they will investigate complaints of over idling.  If you live in California and have diesel vehicles that regularly idle for long periods outside your house or business (especially your house, the rules tend to stricter in residential areas) it might be worth it to complain and see if anything happens.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Garrett</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 02:22:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Less Is More: Hot Water Bottles</title><link>http://treehuggercomments.disqus.com/less_is_more_hot_water_bottles/#comment-17590353</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The favorite way for my wife to warm up is to use a rice bag.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Pour 5lb or so of rice into a some sort of bag, heat in the microwave and you're good to go.  They stay hot for hours.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;My mom taught me this trick.  She actually makes nice rice bags with fuzzy covers and velcro so they can be strapped to your body.  We just use an old pillow case with a know tied in the end.  &lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;My wife said she's seen corn bags also (not popcorn).  I suppose pretty much any grain would work.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Garrett</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 08 Nov 2008 02:24:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Last Report of a Crackpot: How Much Energy to Use the Toilet?</title><link>http://treehuggercomments.disqus.com/last_report_of_a_crackpot_how_much_energy_to_use_the_toilet/#comment-17594524</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Some friends of mine did the thermostat chicken thing one winter.  They were living in a house near Donner Lake in Truckee.  Donner as in Donner Party....  It gets pretty cold here.  Not as cold as Maine but that winter we probably had +40' of snow.  &lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;My friends were renting a big, old mountain house.  It had little to no insulation, giant single pane windows and high ceilings with no ceiling fan.  Heating was with natural gas central air or a hugely inefficient fireplace (the kind that is more for looks than heat).  After the natural gas tank ran out, the roommates got in an argument over paying for the next truck load of gas so they stopped using the central air.  The fireplace was on the second floor and the wood was stored outside on the ground floor, so they stopped using the fireplace.  I visited a few times and mostly everyone just sat around the house wrapped in 0degF sleeping bags and watched TV or they went out.  You could easily see your breath sitting in that house.  It was cold but I think they saved quite a bit of money that way.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Garrett</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2008 13:10:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: BNA refuses to modernize</title><link>http://geekthoughts.disqus.com/bna_refuses_to_modernize/#comment-19278459</link><description>In other news, I think I may need to update my OpenID stuff.&lt;br&gt;&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I guess I better make sure all my batteries are charged before I fly outta there in late September!&lt;/br&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Garrett</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 23:48:20 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>