<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for Isaac Garcia</title><link>http://disqus.com/people/53e97bc928ea10b6ef466fc80785e218/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 23:31:28 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Why I Read Techmeme</title><link>http://avc.disqus.com/why_i_read_techmeme/#comment-175232</link><description>Techmeme is a bunch of people who know each other blogging TO each other. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Wilson's post makes this evidently clear.  The "About" section of Techeme reads:  "At this moment, the next big story in technology may reside on a blog you've never heard of or a news site you don't have time to scan."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Yet - every time I take a look at Techmeme (once a week at best) the Titles and Related Links are always the same people.  Always.   And Wilson's post "that he saw a post from his friend Evslin" speaks to this.  (I like Tom' s blog too).  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Why do you (or anyone else) need Gabe Rivera to connect the dots for you?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Techmeme would be infinitely more interesting if I could get an opinion or story that is NOT written by Scoble, Wilson, Schonfeld, Venturebeat, Jarvis, Israel, Carr or Arrington.  All of these bloggers are decent writers, etc.  I have nothing against any of them (you) - except maybe Arrington :).    j/k      All of the writers are good in their own right - and I'm not trying to take anything away from them.   &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;My point is that everyone jokes that Techmeme is a circle-jerk....this isn't a joke.  Techmeme IS a circle-jerk.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Where are the "blogs you've never heard of?"</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Isaac Garcia</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 12:27:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 37signals is one hell of a profitable business</title><link>http://jedchristiansen.disqus.com/37signals_is_one_hell_of_a_profitable_business/#comment-176504</link><description>I think you are off by a factor of 2.  Just a hunch.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Isaac Garcia</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 00:52:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Still looking to invest in Web 2.0</title><link>http://venturebeat.disqus.com/still_looking_to_invest_in_web_20/#comment-14671872</link><description>Execution and Cash Flow are more important than all of the criteria listed in the above post. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;There are too many "me too" companies that have succeeded with worse technology, with changing business models and who grew from features to products over time.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Its all about execution - and less about technology.  Technology works, obviously, in your favor, but execution trumps everything.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Isaac Garcia</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 12 Jan 2007 16:17:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Still looking to invest in Web 2.0</title><link>http://venturebeat.disqus.com/still_looking_to_invest_in_web_20/#comment-14671878</link><description>You are a good sport Tom.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Isaac Garcia</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 13 Jan 2007 00:10:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Rant of the day - why YOU are to blame for the continuing use of Internet Explorer 6.0</title><link>http://mrontemp.disqus.com/rant_of_the_day_why_you_are_to_blame_for_the_continuing_use_of_internet_explorer_60/#comment-1188684</link><description>&lt;a href="http://www.centraldesktop.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;www.centraldesktop.com&lt;/a&gt; still supports customers on IE6.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Isaac Garcia</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 23:31:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Good Customer Service &amp;#8230; Where did it go?</title><link>http://mattwalters.disqus.com/good_customer_service_8230_where_did_it_go/#comment-1553675</link><description>Good investigative post Matt.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Isaac Garcia</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 28 Apr 2006 20:29:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 2007/07/16/wiki-toolbox/</title><link>http://mashable.disqus.com/thread_4658/#comment-5966946</link><description>Hey there, &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;You left us out....   :</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Isaac Garcia</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 01:48:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 700 MHz: Google Could Still Bid To Win; Bid To Lose More Likely: Analyst</title><link>http://paidcontent.disqus.com/700_mhz_google_could_still_bid_to_win_bid_to_lose_more_likely_analyst/#comment-18840617</link><description>It isn&amp;#39;t about how much Google can/will pay.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It&amp;#39;s simply Game Theory, in action, to get their way.  They won&amp;#39;t spend a dime and they&amp;#39;ll get their way.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Isaac Garcia</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 19 Jan 2008 22:50:15 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>