<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for Tommo_UK</title><link>http://disqus.com/people/5330bdbe9cd5779e3291a1e9ad78dc8b/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2009 08:30:18 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: I'm not happy with Leopard (Scripting News)</title><link>http://scripting.disqus.com/im_not_happy_with_leopard_scripting_news/#comment-8891</link><description>Did you change your name from Whiner to Winer?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Tommo_UK</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2007 09:09:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Is Google Going To Buy Apple?</title><link>http://danielrm26.disqus.com/is_google_going_to_buy_apple/#comment-4353364</link><description>My "friend" has it on good authority that you're talking out of your arse.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Tommo_UK</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 12 Feb 2007 08:56:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Apple Investors the Market is Confused</title><link>http://zacharybass.disqus.com/apple_investors_the_market_is_confused1/#comment-1467083</link><description>"And what should we make of AAPL? We have advanced 7 out of the past 8 trading sessions, but the last three have exposed a growing reluctance to cross over 180. As we approached that level, trading tightened up and volume dropped. Today showed incredible weakness. In the past few sessions, even in the face of market weakness, AAPL plugged on, but today after all that was accomplished was anticlimactic. And today we plotted a spinning top, after a long advance this is indicative of weakness among the Bulls, and signals the possibility that this strong uptrend is in trouble. "&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Option pinning you moron.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Tommo_UK</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2008 05:41:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Apple Investors, No Passion - No Conviction, Just Pussyfooting Around</title><link>http://zacharybass.disqus.com/apple_investors_no_passion_no_conviction_just_pussyfooting_around/#comment-1867540</link><description>As I posted on your SeekingAlpha regurgitation:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;"In my opinion the favor is to the down side, because we have both the 20 and 50 day moving averages riding inside the pattern, providing additional resistance above current price action at 174.56 and 17.96 respectively."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;What are you talking about you fool? The 20-day MA is at about 169/67, and the 50-day MA at 170.22. In fact, the 20-day is crossing above the 50-day today. Resistance? They're support!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Ern, I suggest you return to the wilderness - you're obviously looking at your charts upside down. Or maybe you just haven't got a clue.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Your advice is toxic to investors. You consistently screw up your TA and mislead people, only to apologise when you are caught napping at the wheel having crashed into the TA barrier ahead.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Words fail me.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;PS - look for the typo in your numbers; $17.96 - really?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Tommo_UK</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2008 09:39:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Apple Investors, No Passion - No Conviction, Just Pussyfooting Around</title><link>http://zacharybass.disqus.com/apple_investors_no_passion_no_conviction_just_pussyfooting_around/#comment-1867865</link><description>Yes Ed, I'm unfortunately more than aware of Zach's modus operandi having had to put up with his TA blather on our own AAPL forum over at TMO.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Tommo_UK</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2008 10:04:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: iPhone OS 3.0 Beta: MMS &amp;#038; Tethering</title><link>http://sporkings.disqus.com/iphone_os_30_beta_mms_038_tethering/#comment-10836675</link><description>This method does indeed work to enable tethering here on O2. The problem in the UK at least as of today is that using the old O2 ipcc file which enables tethering disables MMS on OS 3.0 GM ... there must be incompatible settings in the ipcc file with the current method by which O2 are deploying MMS on the iPhone. Even when you edit them manually in the Carrier Settings page on the iPhone back to what they were pre-installing the ipcc file, MMS is still disabled, so it must be something deeper in the ipcc file which is causing the incompatibility.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Any way of producing a new custom ipcc file for O2 for the new 3.0 GM which will enable tethering but not also lose MMS functionality?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Tommo_UK</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2009 08:30:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: BenQ-Siemens&amp;#8217; &amp;#8220;Apple iPhone Killer&amp;#8221; - First Photo</title><link>http://iphonew.disqus.com/benq_siemens8217_8220apple_iphone_killer8221_first_photo/#comment-10828566</link><description>That thing, an "iPhone killer?" Pfffffft! I laughed so hard I fell off my chair and broke my neck...</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Tommo_UK</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 06 Feb 2007 07:38:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Apple To Acquire Palm?</title><link>http://iphonew.disqus.com/apple_to_acquire_palm/#comment-10828926</link><description>Apple doesn't need to buy Palm for its "carrier knowledge" any more than it needs to buy DELL for its "component manufacturer knowledge."</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Tommo_UK</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 21 Feb 2007 08:28:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Orange denies French iPhone deal</title><link>http://iphonew.disqus.com/orange_denies_french_iphone_deal/#comment-10829486</link><description>Since when was a "no comment" the same as a denial?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Sloppy story, iPhone World.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Tommo_UK</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 16 Aug 2007 05:17:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: iPhone is Getting Java Support</title><link>http://iphonew.disqus.com/iphone_is_getting_java_support/#comment-10830017</link><description>I believe the iPhone's CPU actually has a Java VM embedded in it. Its just not utilised.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Tommo_UK</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2007 04:53:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Money starts another iPhone related hold-up for another country *Updated: False*</title><link>http://iphonew.disqus.com/money_starts_another_iphone_related_hold_up_for_another_country_updated_false/#comment-10830055</link><description>As usual, "iPhone World" is getting its news knickers in a twist. If you check you facts boys, you'll find that China Mobile issues a denial to this story and says it is still in talks with Apple for the iPhone.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Tommo_UK</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2007 10:23:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Is Google Going To Buy Apple?</title><link>http://drm.disqus.com/is_google_going_to_buy_apple/#comment-11155267</link><description>My "friend" has it on good authority that you're talking out of your arse.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Tommo_UK</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 12 Feb 2007 08:56:59 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>