Disqus - Latest Comments for Jackson

Re: http://booiyong.blogspot.com/2008/08/blog-post_27.html

Jackson — Wed, 27 Aug 2008 03:42:00 -0000

我也不太爱他们的料理。。。有点马虎。。。还是妈妈煮的客家菜最美味

Re: Seminar in Theology

Jackson — Fri, 26 Aug 2005 23:55:54 -0000

Re: Bob Dylan is pretty cool…

Jackson — Tue, 19 Jul 2005 17:30:02 -0000

Oh. Bob Dylan. Geez, I'm stupid sometimes, didn't even notice that.

Re: Bob Dylan is pretty cool…

Jackson — Tue, 19 Jul 2005 17:29:33 -0000

I like it. It's honest and simple and clean, while avoiding naive optimism and presenting the raw depth of what Jesus Christ has done in saving the piece's speaker. Did you write it yourself? Is it a song?

Re: Comments!

Jackson — Fri, 15 Jul 2005 21:33:21 -0000

oh, hey, sweet! I can comment now.

Re: The Kingdom of Heaven is like a man…

Jackson — Sun, 17 Jul 2005 23:22:37 -0000

holy crud! The queen of heaven is like a man!

Re: The Kingdom of Heaven is like a man…

Jackson — Sun, 17 Jul 2005 12:58:31 -0000

I think you're right. The kingdom is people who trade in everything they've got just to get an incredible awesome pearl.
hee hee. "perl." Like the programming language?

Re: Photofriday: Nerdy

Jackson — Fri, 10 Jun 2005 09:38:00 -0000

Matthew Talamini is...Napoleon Dynamite!

Re: Spring Cleaning

Jackson — Fri, 17 Jun 2005 09:45:00 -0000

I know what you mean about the modern scientific skepticism. Some days it's like Lifehouse puts it: "I've got somebody else's thoughts in my head, I want some of my own."

Re: Uh oh!

Jackson — Tue, 10 May 2005 08:45:00 -0000

quizzes are awesome.

Re: My Ring

Jackson — Tue, 05 Apr 2005 20:12:00 -0000

rockin'!

Re: http://dwightk.com/2005/04/421/

Jackson — Mon, 18 Apr 2005 10:24:00 -0000

It sounds kinda like something out of Napoleon Dynamite the way you say it. Especially the intonation on "Um, I don't have much to say; just want to see how this works..."

Re: Mc Manus

Jackson — Sat, 30 Apr 2005 11:21:00 -0000

Kyle McManus showed up in my dream last night. Dutch Hassleberg, however, was strangely absent.

Re: Wow

Jackson — Thu, 10 Mar 2005 20:46:00 -0000

I too need to finish it, because it's so really good.

Re: Email Etiquette

Jackson — Fri, 18 Mar 2005 21:55:00 -0000

I too have encountered this sort of problem. Email is a strange beast, and the social dynamics of electronic mailing often create just such situations as yours.
In my experience, what to do next really depends on the sort of email and the person it's to. If it's an email with a clear external purpose (e.g. getting information, setting up an event or something similar), go ahead and send another email. If the email was "purposeless" or the purpose was essentially friendship-based, but the person you've sent it to is not an especially close friend, see him/her in person so that he/she can't ignore you. A second email is not especially likely to be answered, though you may try it again if you don't mind not getting a reply back. If the email is to a very close friend discussing close-friend things, you may send a second saying that you'd like to hear from him/her and were wondering why he/she hasn't written back.

These rules require a certain amount of perspicacity and discretion on behalf of the sender, so I trust you to have a good perception of the situation before deciding what to do.

Re: Email Etiquette

Jackson — Fri, 18 Mar 2005 21:55:00 -0000

<span class="deleted-comment">This post has been removed by the author.</span>

Re: I’m done

Jackson — Sun, 06 Feb 2005 01:01:00 -0000

Congrats. You're outside David's room right now drinking directly from the bottle.

Re: Now Reading:

Jackson — Thu, 17 Feb 2005 08:26:00 -0000

Better yet, when are you planning to update your fotothinger? It's been like a month and a half since you shared with us the Dwightfotos!!

Re: More on “Separation of Church and State”

Jackson — Thu, 06 Jan 2005 13:46:00 -0000

According to the "Dwight Priveleges" chart, you now have the privelege of using nonsense words beginning with bilabial stops or labiodental fricatives in your blog posts. Previously your nonsense-word priveleges were restricted to those whose initial sound does not involve the use of the lips.

Re: More on “Separation of Church and State”

Jackson — Wed, 05 Jan 2005 07:58:00 -0000

Correct use of "antidisestablishmentarian": +10 points

Re: Wish List

Jackson — Wed, 05 Jan 2005 07:57:00 -0000

I noticed that you have "Elf" on your wish list. That is one hilarious movie. I would call to mind a joke from it, but there are just so many good ones. It's a funny and good movie all the way through, not just for one joke or scene but all the way through.

Re: Galatians 5:12

Jackson — Wed, 05 Jan 2005 07:52:00 -0000

I, for one, was in hysterics.

Re: Senior Essay

Jackson — Thu, 06 Jan 2005 12:20:00 -0000

Here, Dwight. I'm a fan of the concrete, and maybe looking at something concrete will help here. Let's look at a familiar parable of Jesus', which I think pretty well illustrates the idea of a kingdom and how it works. But understanding it, there's the difficulty...

(Luke 20:9-16)

He went on to tell the people this parable: “A man planted a vineyard, rented it to some farmers and went away for a long time. At harvest time he sent a servant to the tenants so they would give him some of the fruit of the vineyard. But the tenants beat him and sent him away emptyhanded. He sent another servant, but that one also they beat and treated shamefully and sent away emptyhanded. He sent still a third, and they wounded him and threw him out.

“Then the owner of the vineyard said, ‘What shall I do? I will send my son, whom I love; perhaps they will respect him.’

“But when the tenants saw him, they talked the matter over. ‘This is the heir,’ they said. ‘Let's kill him, and the inheritance will be ours.’ So they threw him out of the vineyard and killed him.

“What then will the owner of the vineyard do to them? He will come and kill those tenants and give the vineyard to others.” When the people heard this, they said, “May this never be!”As far as will goes, I think one facet of the story can really help clear that up. The landowner, of course, represents God here, the Lord of the vineyard, the King of the Kingdom. The story works to communicate the truth about the situation, because one of the things it points out is that God is personal--He has motivations, and He decides things and does things for a reason. But here, His motivations are mysterious. He, being God, must have seen this coming...why did He let such irresponsible tenants tend his vineyard? Why did He let them try to usurp what was His due, knowing that He'd have to dispense justice on them anyway? Why would He let anyone besides Himself even mess with the vineyard in the first place?There's no sense in giving away the answer; I certainly don't know it, and could only restate the puzzle from a slightly different perspective. But I think once you can answer questions like these, and like Kristi's (hooray for Kristi!), you'll find the rudiments of a solution to the paradox. I think your brother is really on to something when he says: "The paradox is that God would want what's best for us, but allows us to do what is worst for us. But that is this crazy thing called love. It must have the potential to fail for it to suceed so strongly."

Re: Woo Hoo!

Jackson — Thu, 06 Jan 2005 13:47:00 -0000

"Every moment that we borrow brings us one step closer to the God who's never short of cash. Hey Bono, glad you asked: life is still worth living." -Switchfoot

Re: Ow

Jackson — Sat, 08 Jan 2005 08:34:00 -0000

indeed.

Re: Lend a Hand

Jackson — Fri, 28 Jan 2005 15:56:00 -0000

A prooftext is a passage of scripture used to support a doctrinal statement. It's a text that proves a point of doctrine--hence the name. I am facetiously suggesting that there is an entire book of the Bible full of such passages.

Re: Lend a Hand

Jackson — Thu, 27 Jan 2005 19:48:00 -0000

you might also try the 2nd chapter, 17th verse of the book of Prooftexts... ::smirk::

Re: Free Gift

Jackson — Sat, 29 Jan 2005 21:10:00 -0000

And in Romans 5 and 6, where the translation "free gift" shows up so often, the greek is "charisma". You know, a gift of grace (charis).
I really like to think about the fact that God showers His grace on us independent of whether or not we deserve it. I mean, Christians are always pointing out that we don't deserve it--we use that phrase a whole lot--but I've recently been realizing that, while it's certainly true, there's more to it than that. God is good. He gives good stuff. And the good stuff we get from Him isn't a condemnation or a reminder of how much we don't deserve it: He gives it to us, in a sense, independent of merit. He doesn't even consider whether we're getting what's coming to us when he gives it out. He's simply considering our good! The glory that He gave His own Son indicates that He's good to the righteous and the unrighteous alike! That's just mega-cool to me...

Re: How about this:

Jackson — Fri, 28 Jan 2005 15:58:00 -0000

Sounds like good thinking to me.

Re: Everyman Photo Contest

Jackson — Fri, 03 Dec 2004 08:39:00 -0000

If it's any consolation, I thought the horny toad pic was pretty cool. Seriously, I really did.
Darn proliferation of sarcasm! Thanks to its commonality, even sincere compliments sound like a joke.

Re: MISC

Jackson — Fri, 31 Dec 2004 08:55:00 -0000

Don't be silly, Dwight! I care about your posts. I mean, apart from the intellectually stimulating content (it's mild exaggeration, not sarcasm), they also provide me with an opportunity to make witty comments. like this one.

Re: The Incredibles

Jackson — Tue, 09 Nov 2004 16:53:00 -0000

Nah-uh. Monsters, Inc. is far and away their most imaginative, its plot is every bit as exciting and fast-paced as The Incredibles', and it's got some truly creative and hilarious sight gags, to say nothing of the rest of its humor.
Which isn't to say that, outside of the imagination department, Incredibles doesn't give it a serious run for its money.

Re: I felt actual pain when I read this:

Jackson — Tue, 12 Oct 2004 10:31:00 -0000

My soul is barfing.

Re: Dang…

Jackson — Wed, 20 Oct 2004 19:30:00 -0000

<span class="deleted-comment">This post has been removed by a blog administrator.</span>

Re: Dang…

Jackson — Wed, 20 Oct 2004 19:30:00 -0000

It is rather odd. Perhaps he just enjoys poking fun at politics.

Re: They Found Luther’s Loo

Jackson — Mon, 25 Oct 2004 18:39:00 -0000

Does that make him a Johnnie?

(This is secret code for "I bet you wish I was still doing the hoorays." An alternate, less literal translation reads "Please shoot me.")

Re: Scary Stuff

Jackson — Thu, 28 Oct 2004 20:04:00 -0000

"Anglican Primate"...gives me this mental image of a church sanctuary full of gibbons.

Re: Blogging for fun and Profit

Jackson — Fri, 17 Sep 2004 10:49:00 -0000

I would like to advance the notion that you have not updated in like forever. I only say this because it's true.

Re: Doctrine

Jackson — Sun, 19 Sep 2004 16:18:00 -0000

Well, regarding spirits and prophecy and stuff, here are some helpful passages. It's important to know, I think, that there is doctrine on how to deal with spirits. I've had a couple of experiences with "crazy" things, one of which I can say with fair certainty was from the Spirit of God. Every now and then, I think, God does tell us some pretty intense things in some pretty spiritually intense ways.

Deuteronomy 13:1-6

"If a prophet or a dreamer of dreams arises among you and gives you a sign or a wonder, and the sign or the wonder comes true, concerning which he spoke to you, saying, 'Let us go after other gods (whom you have not known) and let us serve them, you shall not listen to the words of that prophet or that dreamer of dreams; for the LORD your God is testing you to find out if you love the LORD your God with all your heart and with all your soul. You shall follow the LORD your God and fear Him; and you shall keep His commandments, listen to His voice, serve Him, and cling to Him. But that prophet or that dreamer of dreams shall be put to death, because he has counseled rebellion against the LORD your God who brought you from the land of Egypt and redeemed you from the house of slavery, to seduce you from the way in which the LORD your God commanded you to walk. So you shall purge the evil from among you."I would not be surprised, then, if John had that passage in mind when he wrote the following in his first letter:

"By this you know the Spirit of God: every spirit that confesses that Jesus Christ has come in the flesh is from God; and every spirit that does not confess Jesus is not from God; this is the spirit of the antichrist, of which you have heard that it is coming, and now it is already in the world."Similarly, we've got Paul in I Corinthians 12:3. I believe Sir Robert was telling us his interpretation of this during the car ride back from the retreat.

"Therefore I make known to you that no one speaking by the Spirit of God says, "Jesus is accursed"; and no one can say, "Jesus is Lord," except by the Holy Spirit."

Re: Alternatives to Google

Jackson — Mon, 02 Aug 2004 20:34:00 -0000

Hooray for SHUT UP, JACKSON.

Re: The Peace that Passes Understanding…

Jackson — Tue, 17 Aug 2004 21:42:00 -0000

Me too. It's been awhile since I really had peace, but yeah, here it is. Right here, right now.
In all seriousness, hooray for peace.

Re: New Post Icons

Jackson — Sat, 21 Aug 2004 06:13:00 -0000

Sweet. Icons.
It's 6:10 and I just got back from a nightmare, so it's nice to see some benign order in the world...

Re: The Absolute Best Songs of 2009 (.25 of the way through)

Jackson — Wed, 01 Apr 2009 19:29:51 -0000

It's hard to argue with a list like that! So much win.

PS: I signed up to imeem.

Re: YouTube Bizarro: a família de Jonathan

Jackson — Mon, 03 Mar 2008 00:10:44 -0000

Depois não sabem pq existem filhos que trucidam os pais...

Re: Jay-Z Is ALIVE – And Has Some Blue Magic

Jackson — Sat, 22 Sep 2007 20:16:10 -0000

I kinda like this song

Re: Album Review: Vanessa Carlton – Heroes & Thieves

Jackson — Tue, 16 Oct 2007 08:23:04 -0000

H&T took me a little time to get used to, but now i love it.

Re: David Schmidz of U. of Arizona on Property Rights

Jackson — Tue, 02 May 2006 17:07:39 -0000

This really isn't surprising at all -- scarcity is a fundamental attribute of "property," and where there is not scarcity, there is no need for property.

So the key question is, then: are ideas scarce? I would argue that they are not, in fact, that it is impossible for them to be scarce.

Re: My Favourite Disney Movies

Jackson — Wed, 24 Sep 2008 15:12:27 -0000

lion king, hercules, pocahuntas!! and the all-time favourite pirates of the caribbean!!!

Re: ആദ്യബ്ലോഗ് ദമ്പതികളുടെ ആദ്യരാത്രി

Jackson — Mon, 22 Oct 2007 20:59:00 -0000

ബെര്‍ളിച്ചായാ.. സൂപ്പര്‍..

Re: ആദ്യബ്ലോഗ് ദമ്പതികളുടെ ആദ്യരാത്രി

Jackson — Mon, 22 Oct 2007 20:59:00 -0000

ബെര്‍ളിച്ചായാ.. സൂപ്പര്‍..

Re: ആദ്യബ്ലോഗ് ദമ്പതികളുടെ ആദ്യരാത്രി

Jackson — Mon, 22 Oct 2007 20:59:00 -0000

ബെര്‍ളിച്ചായാ.. സൂപ്പര്‍..

Re: Saw Some Sexy Zombies on Flickr

Jackson — Thu, 23 Oct 2008 10:16:00 -0000

http://photos-g.ak.facebook.com/photos-ak-snc1/...

Re: The Drums – I Felt Stupid

Jackson — Sun, 20 Sep 2009 05:59:29 -0000

Summer isn't over until we say it's over! Fuck the calendar, it's still hot as hell in LA :)

Re: MSN Search Toolbar

Jackson — Thu, 26 May 2005 08:58:00 -0000

I've been using Google desktop for a while now and like it for the same reasons.

Re: White Denim – Fits, Album Review

Jackson — Fri, 04 Sep 2009 22:46:58 -0000

this album is severely underrated! it's brill.. OLD SCHOOL MAGIC!!

Re: New Song: The Killers – Human

Jackson — Mon, 22 Sep 2008 16:24:34 -0000

This here new killers' single "Human" sounds like new order meets bruce springsteen, and spliced w/ a bit of bowie style lyricism.
"Are we human or are we Dancer?"

On a side note Sam's Town is a great album, Flowers claims it be one of the greatest records of the last twenty years, while critics claimed it to be a poor album knocking off bruce springsteens born to run. i say born to run is one of the greatest albums of its time, and sam's town is as to these last twenty years.

Re: New Song: The Killers – Human

Jackson — Mon, 22 Sep 2008 22:44:59 -0000

oF MONTREAL and titus andronicus blow, and probably everything else your listening to. surprisingly enough the killers ive always liked, and sams town is their best effort thus far and will probably stay that way. sams town can only arguably be one of the best records of the last twaenty yrs. one of the best of 2006, for sure.

Re: Antonio Banderas to star in THE BIG BANG

Jackson — Mon, 11 May 2009 21:15:00 -0000

Uh, I saw this film already... it's called Yesterday Was A Lie. Seriously, are there no new ideas in Hollywood? Do you people just rip off EVERYTHING?

Re: Antonio Banderas to star in THE BIG BANG

Jackson — Tue, 12 May 2009 17:18:00 -0000

I saw Yesteday Was A Lie at a film festival in northern CA last year and it sounds similar to me- a sci fi noir about a detective searching for a mad genius with the secret formula to discover particles that unlock the nature of reality. Now that I think about it, Krantz's last film Alien Raiders was playing at the same festival. I wonder if this is based on it or something.

Re: Annals of Great Ideas: Water Park in Drought-Stricken Region

Jackson — Wed, 21 Nov 2007 13:25:52 -0000

The same thing is happening in Concord, NC (just north of Charlotte). We are in an extreme drought, and they are building some waterpark that won't even be open to the public. Only to guests at some fancy resort.

Mind you, this is after they begged and pleaded to take water away from an adjacent river basin because they "don't have enough water". (older story on Treehugger about this issue - search for Catawba river)

Re: Emory University's Eco-Friendly Building is a Bird "Slaughterhouse"

Jackson — Mon, 26 Nov 2007 21:21:24 -0000

Can a building really be environmentally friendly if it also happens to be a songbird "slaughterhouse,"

Yes, if the Environmental Officer is doing his job and convinced his superiors to remedy the situation. The building was certainly not designed to kill animals. The story here should be the resolution not the original problem. Congrats to Mr. Wegner.

Re: Caption contest!

Jackson — Wed, 08 Aug 2007 15:56:33 -0000

Really, Tom, They are this big.

I saw them with my own eyes. He wasn't kidding.

Re: This just in…

Jackson — Thu, 09 Aug 2007 15:25:16 -0000

I really don't understand what the hubbub is all about.

I thought the debate this whole session was about finding the revenue to meet the spending plans.

All the house did was just pass a budget that implements the spending plans, but didn't back it up with the revenue side of the debate.

I mean - if they can just spend whatever they want, why the heck were they here all summer? They could have just passed whatever spending they wanted back in May, and skipped all that discussion of GRT, gaming, loopholes, income tax, etc.

Is this confusing to anyone else but me!?

Re: This just in… Part 2

Jackson — Thu, 09 Aug 2007 16:27:28 -0000

Hynes said he needed a budget passed or a court order.

Do you think the judge will act soon enough on this that he gets his court order?

Re: On pork and hypocrisy

Jackson — Fri, 10 Aug 2007 10:42:31 -0000

Those projects belong in a capital budget, not an operating budget.

If they want projects for their district - infrastructure investments, and economic development - they need to pass a capital plan.

I see a difference.

Re: On pork and hypocrisy

Jackson — Fri, 10 Aug 2007 10:46:06 -0000

Basically - if you want "pork", do it as part of a broader capital plan, not as a way to grease votes onto an operating budget.

I don't see a problem here with the Dems' position.

Re: On pork and hypocrisy

Jackson — Fri, 10 Aug 2007 11:02:11 -0000

Rich,

I am not saying I agree with that. But I would point out that they would be different bills. They are not stuck in together. They don't have to vote to include something unrelated to get what they want.

Re: On pork and hypocrisy

Jackson — Fri, 10 Aug 2007 11:26:10 -0000

Where's the full list?

Re: Blagojevich can’t stop being a backbencher

Jackson — Fri, 10 Aug 2007 10:57:47 -0000

Rich,

I think you have some good insights in your column, but I think you have an essential piece of your argument wrong. You said that the Governor didn't have legislation for his proposals for months after he announced them.

"It took him months to put his gross receipts tax -- a gigantic hit on business -- into actual legislative language. The same went for his sweeping health insurance plan: dozens of splashy news conferences about a proposal that never really existed."

I thought that sounded wrong, so I looked it up on ILGA. This is what I found:

Gross Receipts Tax/Education plan:
Announced March 8 / Legislation on March 30.
http://ilga.gov/legislation/billstatus.asp?
DocNum=1&GAID=9&GA=95&Do
cTypeID=SB&LegID=26955&SessionID=51

Healthcare plan:
Announced March 8 / Legislation on March 30.
http://ilga.gov/legislation/billstatus.asp?Doc
Num=5&GAID
=9&GA=95&DocTypeID=SB&LegID=27215
&SessionID=51

Re: Blagojevich can’t stop being a backbencher

Jackson — Fri, 10 Aug 2007 11:04:03 -0000

No, Rich:

Senate Amendment 1 to Senate Bill 1 was filed on March 30.

It is the full thing. Look:
http://ilga.gov/legislation/95/SB/09500SB0001sa...

Re: Blagojevich can’t stop being a backbencher

Jackson — Fri, 10 Aug 2007 11:41:21 -0000

I call BS.

You are complaining because the bills have been amended?

First you complain that he doesn't compromise. Then you complain because he amended the bills too much.

Get over yourself.

The legislation was there. It sucked, but it was there.

Re: Blagojevich can’t stop being a backbencher

Jackson — Fri, 10 Aug 2007 11:46:38 -0000

"To this day, we still really donâ€™t have an â€œIllinois Coveredâ€ plan. That bill has seen SIX substantial amendments filed (7, if you count the last one which renamed it the â€œMargaret Smith Illinois Covered Act.â€ They could file six more amendments and they still wouldnâ€™t be done. "

Re: Blagojevich can’t stop being a backbencher

Jackson — Fri, 10 Aug 2007 12:09:31 -0000

Unfortunately, Rich, I don't think the healthcare bill has struggled because it is a bad bill.

It is because it's the Governor's bill.

There is no amount of compromise he can do to get rid of that stigma. And that's too bad. Because it could have done a lot of good for millions of people.

Re: Goodbye, Spin Sister

Jackson — Thu, 15 May 2008 11:56:22 -0000

You will be missed. They say no one is irreplacable, but you might be

Re: * UPDATED x13 * Today’s rallies, protests, etc. * STATEHOUSE CLOSED * Quinn open to lower corporate tax hike ***

Jackson — Tue, 23 Jun 2009 21:36:41 -0000

Frans ignorant posts (and hateful political views) must be part of the "new media" we've been hearing about....yet another reason to avoid facebook.

Re: Fun with Proft

Jackson — Wed, 24 Jun 2009 12:59:03 -0000

I love when conservatives can't defend their positions so the blame the "liberal media". It pathetic.

Re: Jack Ryan’s return?

Jackson — Fri, 26 Jun 2009 12:52:41 -0000

Yes Captain America, putting up a flyer in the bathroom is quite ingenious. After that, I got some land in Arizona I think you'd be interested in.

Re: Question of the day

Jackson — Mon, 29 Jun 2009 21:00:13 -0000

Quinn leaves the crowd scared straight.

Re: http://gettingmoreawesome.blogspot.com/2009/09/reminder-twitter-was-started-in-2006.html

Jackson — Mon, 28 Sep 2009 12:02:25 -0000

I joined in early 2007. Really, SxSW 2007 is when it seemed to take off with the early adopter set. I remember it being a really enthusiastic user base and there was lots of development around their API and quite a bit of discussion about twitter outside of twitter.

So, I would imagine it felt like it was taking off pretty early and has steadily increased since (until the meteoric rise this year).

Re: http://berlythomas.blogspot.com/2007/10/blog-post_6803.html

Jackson — Mon, 22 Oct 2007 20:29:00 -0000

ബെര്‍ളിച്ചായാ.. സൂപ്പര്‍..

Re: http://www.timepassguru.com/2009/05/want-to-do-magic-on-google-just-see.html

Jackson — Tue, 05 May 2009 14:25:00 -0000

Hi friend, your blog is nice. come and visit my blog also. if you like my blog please join as a follower

Re: DIY: Mini Moss Ecosystem

Jackson — Mon, 30 Mar 2009 16:29:00 -0000

I love this! I linked to my site: superforest.org. Thank you for sharing.

Re: 3D Networking

Jackson — Sun, 19 Aug 2007 11:20:00 -0000

Thanks Paul!

I saw you across the room and meant to come say hi but didn't make it over there. Next time for sure.

Re: http://www.weekinrewind.com/2008/07/giveaway-spaced-complete-series.html

Jackson — Thu, 24 Jul 2008 00:24:00 -0000

In the end, "Spaced" was just like a sandwich toaster. You know, you just forget you've got it. And it just sits there on the top of the cupboard collecting a layer of greasy fudge. And even if you do see it you just assume it's broken, you think if it's working I'd be using it all the time, but you don't and it just sits there. Then one day, you get an overwhelming desire for toasted sandwiches, you know? And you get it down and it works, and you can't believe it, you know? And then you make every kind of toasted sandwich there is, you have toasted sandwich parties. You make Marmite and cheese, chocolate and...

All in All I love "Spaced" and would do exceptionally naughty things to win.

Disqus - Latest Comments for Jackson

Re: http://booiyong.blogspot.com/2008/08/blog-post_27.html

Re: Seminar in Theology

Re: Bob Dylan is pretty cool…

Re: Bob Dylan is pretty cool…

Re: Comments!

Re: The Kingdom of Heaven is like a man…

Re: The Kingdom of Heaven is like a man…

Re: Photofriday: Nerdy

Re: Spring Cleaning

Re: Uh oh!

Re: My Ring

Re: http://dwightk.com/2005/04/421/

Re: Mc Manus

Re: Wow

Re: Email Etiquette

Re: Email Etiquette

Re: I’m done

Re: Now Reading:

Re: More on “Separation of Church and State”

Re: More on “Separation of Church and State”

Re: Wish List

Re: Galatians 5:12

Re: Senior Essay

Re: Woo Hoo!

Re: Ow

Re: Lend a Hand

Re: Lend a Hand

Re: Free Gift

Re: How about this:

Re: Everyman Photo Contest

Re: MISC

Re: The Incredibles

Re: I felt actual pain when I read this:

Re: Dang…

Re: Dang…

Re: They Found Luther’s Loo

Re: Scary Stuff

Re: Blogging for fun and Profit

Re: Doctrine

Re: Alternatives to Google

Re: The Peace that Passes Understanding…

Re: New Post Icons

Re: The Absolute Best Songs of 2009 (.25 of the way through)

Re: YouTube Bizarro: a família de Jonathan

Re: Jay-Z Is ALIVE – And Has Some Blue Magic

Re: Album Review: Vanessa Carlton – Heroes & Thieves

Re: David Schmidz of U. of Arizona on Property Rights

Re: My Favourite Disney Movies

Re: ആദ്യബ്ലോഗ് ദമ്പതികളുടെ ആദ്യരാത്രി

Re: ആദ്യബ്ലോഗ് ദമ്പതികളുടെ ആദ്യരാത്രി

Re: ആദ്യബ്ലോഗ് ദമ്പതികളുടെ ആദ്യരാത്രി

Re: Saw Some Sexy Zombies on Flickr

Re: The Drums – I Felt Stupid

Re: MSN Search Toolbar

Re: White Denim – Fits, Album Review

Re: New Song: The Killers – Human

Re: New Song: The Killers – Human

Re: Antonio Banderas to star in THE BIG BANG

Re: Antonio Banderas to star in THE BIG BANG

Re: Annals of Great Ideas: Water Park in Drought-Stricken Region

Re: Emory University's Eco-Friendly Building is a Bird "Slaughterhouse"

Re: Caption contest!

Re: This just in…

Re: This just in… Part 2

Re: On pork and hypocrisy

Re: On pork and hypocrisy

Re: On pork and hypocrisy

Re: On pork and hypocrisy

Re: Blagojevich can’t stop being a backbencher

Re: Blagojevich can’t stop being a backbencher

Re: Blagojevich can’t stop being a backbencher

Re: Blagojevich can’t stop being a backbencher

Re: Blagojevich can’t stop being a backbencher

Re: Goodbye, Spin Sister

Re: *** UPDATED x13 *** Today’s rallies, protests, etc. *** STATEHOUSE CLOSED *** Quinn open to lower corporate tax hike ***

Re: Fun with Proft

Re: Jack Ryan’s return?

Re: Question of the day

Re: http://gettingmoreawesome.blogspot.com/2009/09/reminder-twitter-was-started-in-2006.html

Re: * UPDATED x13 * Today’s rallies, protests, etc. * STATEHOUSE CLOSED * Quinn open to lower corporate tax hike ***