http://disqus.com/people/52383ac9970048785cada8843fc6726c/enSun, 18 May 2008 06:36:36 -0000http://washingtonindependent.disqus.com/and_they8217re_really_not_that_good_for_the_environment_either/#comment-1789361every biofuel out there has its advantages and disadvantages. you take something to make something,<br><br>one area that has been looked at and i believe is the best option, is cold fusion technology, most people dont know what this is. its heavy water and adding specific electrolytes into the fusion, which theoretically should cause excessive heat at room temperture. easy to make no emissions, and extremely cheap to produce. One huge drawback is that theres very little funding because its still just an idea. nuclear scientists all over the world are trying to form this tech but have had little success. nasa is the leading entity of development and testing. they are still in the beginning stages. they estimate it would take several years just develop this new thinking of nuclear fusion tech.<br><br>they say in order to transform this fusion into fuel it would cost per household 50 dollars a yr. the fuel would be infinite and would never run out. alright people lets get this going.lawdog6153Sun, 18 May 2008 06:36:36 -0000