<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for Turlough</title><link>http://disqus.com/people/5235d459a3e098d4f7445c8584de1dfb/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 29 Jul 2005 04:57:05 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Are bloggers &amp;lsquo;delusional&amp;rsquo;? | Martin Stabe</title><link>http://martinstabe.disqus.com/are_bloggers_lsquodelusionalrsquo_martin_stabe/#comment-1927503</link><description>Just a side issue: why are serious political / social commentary bloggers so willing to align themselves with blogging generally by not distinguishing between types of blogs? Most blogs fall into the indulgent, train-spotting category that are only of interest to loved ones. Do professional footballers say they do kick-about?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Anyone new to blogging (most of the UK population) will be mightily confused by this willingness to associate with drivel.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Turlough</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 05 Jan 2005 17:20:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: FOIA amendments possible?</title><link>http://martinstabe.disqus.com/foia_amendments_possible/#comment-1927572</link><description>Political football on a decidedly unlevel playing field? We all know whose side the ref is on.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Turlough</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 11 Feb 2005 05:50:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: British political blogosphere readership</title><link>http://martinstabe.disqus.com/british_political_blogosphere_readership/#comment-1927660</link><description>I never know how to interpret those figures -- how many do you think read the regular columnists in the national newspapers. Not a lot, I'd guess. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;How many blog accesses are genuine reads? Who knows!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Turlough</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 12 Apr 2005 11:47:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: London media scooped on bomb photos</title><link>http://martinstabe.disqus.com/london_media_scooped_on_bomb_photos/#comment-1927757</link><description>What are you missing? Er, money?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Turlough</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 29 Jul 2005 04:57:05 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>