<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for pwb</title><link>http://disqus.com/people/50e2d3401efa8a448483b59397972378/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 21:19:45 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: SMTP is dead, long live SMTP</title><link>http://avc.disqus.com/smtp_is_dead_long_live_smtp_38/#comment-13381</link><description>Email might take a hit but I think any day now we will be discovering that SMTP would be the best way to deliver outbound notifications (for programatic consumption). Request/Response-style APIs are not approriate for everything.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">pwb</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2007 15:23:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: My Love Hate Relationship With Technorati</title><link>http://avc.disqus.com/my_love_hate_relationship_with_technorati/#comment-27100</link><description>Technorati has never had a very good handle on how users do and would use its service.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">pwb</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2007 10:44:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why I Just Bought Amazon (AMZN)</title><link>http://avc.disqus.com/why_i_just_bought_amazon_amzn/#comment-37659</link><description>Until there is a fairly decent competitive offering, I have to think that it is too risky to put your whole company on AWS.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">pwb</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 16 Dec 2007 20:43:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why You Can Sometimes Wait For Scale To Execute Your Business Model</title><link>http://avc.disqus.com/why_you_can_sometimes_wait_for_scale_to_execute_your_business_model/#comment-63723</link><description>Don't get defensive...get offensive!! Monetizing early can leave services vulnerable to competitors who wait. It's easier to make money from heavy usage than it is to create a service that garners heavy usage.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">pwb</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2008 12:47:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Texting In Purchases</title><link>http://avc.disqus.com/texting_in_purchases_12/#comment-89767</link><description>As some have pointed out, you can start watching the movie in about a minute.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The best test-to-pay use case I've seen so far is paying for parking. There are several municipalities and companies rolling out such service.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;PayPal's "Text-to-Buy" is also interesting as a general putrpose payment solution.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">pwb</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2008 01:46:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: delicious search</title><link>http://avc.disqus.com/delicious_search/#comment-124453</link><description>So was Delicious below &lt;a href="http://Ask.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;Ask.com&lt;/a&gt; the month before?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">pwb</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2008 15:55:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Free Is A Great Way To Make Money</title><link>http://avc.disqus.com/free_is_a_great_way_to_make_money_90/#comment-178434</link><description>The reason you should offer FREE is because you *can*! The variable cost of providing an interent service is very near zero. If you don't, someone else will. And it's a perfectly reasonable way to acquire paying customers.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It's lame we are still conflicted about this. And please don't give me any of the "yes, but" or "it depends" crud.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">pwb</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 16:07:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Free Is A Great Way To Make Money</title><link>http://avc.disqus.com/free_is_a_great_way_to_make_money_90/#comment-178478</link><description>This point cannot be overstated: "From the consumer's perspective, though, there is a huge difference between cheap and free. Give a product away and it can go viral. Charge a single cent for it and you're in an entirely different business"</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">pwb</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 16:20:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A Twitter Stock Quote Bot</title><link>http://avc.disqus.com/a_twitter_stock_quote_bot_81/#comment-216897</link><description>Why didn't IM bots ever take off? Seems like such a no-brainer but I didn't see anyone other than ActiveBuddy pursue it.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">pwb</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 19:13:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Thoughts On Online Video</title><link>http://avc.disqus.com/thoughts_on_online_video/#comment-273793</link><description>The point is, if you are going to try to develop an online-video-based franchise, you're going to have a rough go of it because you are up against millions of others who have different standards of "success".&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Also, I'd like to point out that YouTube was far from lucky. They made some very conscientious decisions that were key to success, namely using low quality Flash-based video that started instantly, having little or no restrictions on uploads and uploaders and making it easier than easy to push videos out to MySpace et al.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">pwb</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 03:14:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Are you using Firefox 3? (Scripting News)</title><link>http://scripting.disqus.com/are_you_using_firefox_3_scripting_news/#comment-277515</link><description>For general purpose browsing, IE on WIndows, Safari on Mac.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;For special purpose (development, preference) I will occasionally fire up Firefox on Mac/Win or Safari on Win.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">pwb</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 14:50:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twitter and the importance of architecture</title><link>http://mathewingram.disqus.com/twitter_and_the_importance_of_architecture/#comment-570207</link><description>Mike's right, Cyndy's wrong. Scaling is *way* easier than creating a super-popular service.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">pwb</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2008 00:05:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Reports of the 3G iPhone&amp;#8217;s imminent release may be slightly exxagerated</title><link>http://venturebeat.disqus.com/reports_of_the_3g_iphone8217s_imminent_release_may_be_slightly_exxagerated_63/#comment-447496</link><description>Why would AT&amp;T subsidize something that will sell fine without a subsidy? Wouldn't the subsidy be much better timed several months after all the early adopters claimed theirs?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">pwb</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 11 May 2008 21:30:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Jaxtr raises $10 million to expand cheap international calls</title><link>http://venturebeat.disqus.com/jaxtr_raises_10_million_to_expand_cheap_international_calls/#comment-736234</link><description>I don't get the "social networking" aspect of the service. Who ants or needs that? All these services stil can't figure out how to call Italy Mobile for less than 20c/minute which is a joke. Forget all the social curd and concentrate on the core service!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">pwb</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 03:10:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: My new iPhone will cost how much? Thanks a lot, AT&amp;#038;T</title><link>http://venturebeat.disqus.com/my_new_iphone_will_cost_how_much_thanks_a_lot_at038t/#comment-794701</link><description>"AT&amp;T customers who haven’t bought an iPhone yet" can be eligible for the $199/$299 prices.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">pwb</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 21:19:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 2008/03/24/peerflix/</title><link>http://mashable.disqus.com/thread_6437/#comment-5998816</link><description>Brilliant idea!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">pwb</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 02:54:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google Reader needs GPC</title><link>http://scobleizer.disqus.com/google_reader_needs_gpc/#comment-9696976</link><description>What is "GPC"?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">pwb</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 26 Dec 2007 13:23:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google about to drop the other Enterprise shoe on Microsoft?</title><link>http://scobleizer.disqus.com/google_about_to_drop_the_other_enterprise_shoe_on_microsoft/#comment-9702821</link><description>Putting out an open source copy of Exchange is a total no-brainer. Zimbra was far too focused on the front-end. Scalix is interesting but on a weird platform. Open Xchange could be the answer although it clouds it's story with all sorts of "collaboration" mumbo jumbo.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">pwb</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 16:19:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Israel: a country too far from Mike Arrington&amp;#8217;s house</title><link>http://scobleizer.disqus.com/israel_a_country_too_far_from_mike_arrington8217s_house/#comment-9703815</link><description>Despite the echo chamber in the valley, it's still a far better place to start companies. Has much value been created in those other cities you mention?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">pwb</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 15:50:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Should services charge &amp;#8220;super users&amp;#8221;?</title><link>http://scobleizer.disqus.com/should_services_charge_8220super_users8221/#comment-9705764</link><description>Does anyone *actually* know how Twitter does what is does? Given the 140 byte limit, Twitter seems very "doable" with some basic design choices. This is why I think Ruby/Rails may really be a culprit here...it's too high level to support some of the things Twitter needs to do.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">pwb</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 01:37:15 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>