<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for fool</title><link>http://disqus.com/people/50a5cfff7782f331d3ebdbc0cd8e20f0/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 09:42:23 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Tappity-tap Cranial Tap – anyone home?</title><link>http://themetaversejournal.disqus.com/tappity_tap_cranial_tap_a_anyone_home/#comment-2896222</link><description>Thanks for the "Review"... would be interested to hear more of these, maybe you can find a group that's doing some really good work in this space.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">fool</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 14:14:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Microsoft tells MVPs &amp;#8220;we&amp;#8217;re in it to win&amp;#8221; &amp;#8212; Really?</title><link>http://scobleizer.disqus.com/microsoft_tells_mvps_8220we8217re_in_it_to_win8221_8212_really/#comment-9673301</link><description>My guess is that MS wants to develop it's own web-application stack-- XAML etc. on Vista clients; MS-designed SOAP protocols; .NET apps running on Windows servers.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Google and friends are getting there first because they're using already-deployed technology: HTML, Flash, Javascript in any browser on the client; HTTP requests to get data; whatever kind of apps you want (Java, C, C++, Perl, Python, Ruby) running on Linux servers.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">fool</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2007 10:27:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Microsoft tells MVPs &amp;#8220;we&amp;#8217;re in it to win&amp;#8221; &amp;#8212; Really?</title><link>http://scobleizer.disqus.com/microsoft_tells_mvps_8220we8217re_in_it_to_win8221_8212_really/#comment-9673291</link><description>Bascially, MS is "innovating" a whole lot, but it wants to innovate the whole solution, and all the innovation is staying within its R&amp;amp;D walls.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">fool</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2007 10:29:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Chi 2009: Day 1</title><link>http://bumblebeelabsblog.disqus.com/chi_2009_day_1/#comment-11132317</link><description>Thanks! Am looking forward to hearing more of your experiences (was hoping to attend but can't).</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">fool</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 09:42:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Survey: Where Do You Get Your News?</title><link>http://treehuggercomments.disqus.com/survey_where_do_you_get_your_news/#comment-17530766</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Forgot NPR.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">fool</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2007 10:50:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Into the Mouths of Babes: Green to Grow Bottles</title><link>http://treehuggercomments.disqus.com/into_the_mouths_of_babes_green_to_grow_bottles/#comment-17530775</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Why not use glass?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">fool</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2007 10:49:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Book Review: Back of the Napkin by Dan Roam</title><link>http://vizthink.disqus.com/book_review_back_of_the_napkin_by_dan_roam/#comment-19450678</link><description>If you have an amazon affiliate thing, how about a link to order the book and kick back a few bucks to vizthink.com?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">fool</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 14:36:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Changes and Enhancements at VizThink</title><link>http://vizthink.disqus.com/changes_and_enhancements_at_vizthink/#comment-19450873</link><description>Hi Guys,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Are you saying you won't be doing any more large VizThink conferences? Or that they will be smaller? Or less frequent? Or that you're just going to be working on building the VizThink community more continuously but at a lower level of intensity than the conference planning?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thanks&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Reed</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">fool</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 09:31:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Changes and Enhancements at VizThink</title><link>http://vizthink.disqus.com/changes_and_enhancements_at_vizthink/#comment-19450876</link><description>Thanks Ryan, &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Sounds good to me (not able to make it to many conferences, but have enjoyed following the site, podcasts, etc. and have learned a lot.)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">fool</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 11:10:35 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>