DISQUS

Whatever happened to asking a question. You could have posted this on a blog somewhere for the same effect and might have even had a healthy debate.

To answer your one line question though *********** marriage is just as normal as normal marriage. It's been in practice long before America was founded and won't stop anytime soon. Those who don't embrace it will only find themselves lost in the times, regardless of which generation they belong to.

As for Gays....personally I disagree with same *** marriage. The very definition of marriage has changed because of it if you ask me. However to each his own I don't hold anything against them. I would say that resorting to calling people bigots is a very immature way of getting your point across. You are no different than the people that belittle those homosexuals that would stand up for their marriage. I personally think you are intolerant of the rest of the world. I have a suggestion for ya though. From 1500-1800 when people wanted to escape persecution they left and headed west. You could leave yourself if you don't like how things are. Maybe to a country that's even less tolerant of your beliefs. You have no idea just how good you have it. Flaunting your freedoms and demanding more. You really need to let things go.

Greater Manchester Police give these out free of charge. They come more in a zip bag so there not as nice packaged. They have started giving them out as only 1 in 12 revoered bikes were been returned to their owners. All the police in the area have the readers.

So in other words Homeland Colors...Obama Faces Doubts Among South Carolina Blacks. Just like the story implied. When was the last newspaper story where they did actual quote generating interviews with more than a dozen or so people.


For all I know, the AP has done more polling in South Carolina recently that shows similar findings to the previous polls. At the very least I'm sure they are privy to off the record results shared with them by the Clinton, Obama, Edwards campaigns etc.

Get it straight When will somebody get this straight??  The amendment DOES NOT stop law enforcment from obtaining gun trace data for an investigation!  It does stop the data from becoming publicly available.  Why do  you think the Faternal Order of Police and the ATF both want to keep the law? 

The reason Bloomberg and his croonies want the trace data made available to the public is so that they can sue gun dealers out of business.  However the media continues to make it out like the law blocks vital information for local police and that simply isn't true.  Maybe some journalist will eventually READ the amendmet at some point?

Get it straight When will somebody get this straight??  The amendment DOES NOT stop law enforcment from obtaining gun trace data for an investigation!  It does stop the data from becoming publicly available.  Why do  you think the Faternal Order of Police and the ATF both want to keep the law? 

The reason Bloomberg and his croonies want the trace data made available to the public is so that they can sue gun dealers out of business.  However the media continues to make it out like the law blocks vital information for local police and that simply isn't true.  Maybe some journalist will eventually READ the amendmet at some point?

Btw, I'm a big fan of your new adaptive-width site design!

The bitmaps of WPF rendered text looks to be a bit lighter than what I normally see on my screen natively... have you adjusted the gamma values differently for your screen?

http://www.microsoft.com/typography/cleartype/t...
http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa9702...