<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for Phil</title><link>http://disqus.com/people/4d68b3648fc32e1ee3b6e4f4a388fe47/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2008 18:57:58 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: T&amp;#038;T needs better reporters</title><link>http://theliminghouse.disqus.com/t038t_needs_better_reporters/#comment-1226489</link><description>Without wishing to further any air of despondency, I would just like to point out that in the BBC, that institution seen as a paragon of journalistic skill and integrity, over-worked and under-skilled journos get basic things wrong on a regular basis.  As every, people tend to fall down on basic numerical 'explanatory' skills (eg. 'x has increased by 100%' is not the same as ' x is 100% of what it was a year ago' and so many others i could bore you with...).  But even the specialist business journalists get it wrong.  For example, I worked on a programme the other day which gave three seperate figures during the course of the hour for the increase in profits of a major company.  Sad to say, the problem isn't just in TT...</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Phil</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2008 18:57:58 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>