<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for Svetlana Gladkova</title><link>http://disqus.com/people/4cfeca5be04f577f2cb4253491006f09/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 04:09:13 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: WordPress.org Bloggers Getting The Word Out</title><link>http://surphaceblog.disqus.com/wordpressorg_bloggers_getting_the_word_out/#comment-21976120</link><description>Thanks for mentioning Profy article as the one deserving attention for future users.&lt;br&gt;And I can say that Sphere it widget has always been a great addition to our blog, thanks again for giving the widget to us in the first place.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Svetlana Gladkova</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2007 03:07:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: In Japan You Can Take Classes From Your Cell Phone</title><link>http://sbspalding.disqus.com/in_japan_you_can_take_classes_from_your_cell_phone_72/#comment-22720</link><description>Awesome idea, really. You are absolutely right about Japan leading innovation in the mobile field and here is another proof. The only thing I personally think needs to be added is not a social network but something in terms of actual discussion - some conference calls maybe for the lecturer and students to discuss the subject. Anyway thanks for the great post.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Svetlana Gladkova</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2007 04:55:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Profy&amp;#8217;s Blogging Platform Goes ALPHA</title><link>http://sbspalding.disqus.com/profy8217s_blogging_platform_goes_alpha_89/#comment-70669</link><description>Thanks for the detailed review Steve, I appreciate the time you spent on Profy. I like your honesty about our current disadvantages which we can easily admit.&lt;br&gt;As for the killer feature, it is not actually the feature - it is more of a concept. A concept of close integration of all the stages included in the process of blogging. Say, you find an interesting piece of news in your feed reader, you search for more information using blog search in the same place (you don't need to go anywhere else - we have Sphere-powered blog search), you subscribe to new interesting feeds right from within the search results with one click. Than you can blog about any news (Blog it!), publish and share with some people. And when you get a comment, you can start a private conversation with the commenter and see what other feeds he or she reads. This is it. It may sound a bit complicated but our goal at this stage is to provide a one-stop tool for bloggers. Later on when we add features (and we currently only have about 20% of the roadmap completed) it will be a more universal tool but the concept remains.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;P.S. How comes you did not see the Template tab in the Blog section? We have a number of colorful themes in it. Not too many but we will be adding them as well, of course.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Svetlana Gladkova</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2008 14:38:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Challenge: Web Culture Around The World</title><link>http://sbspalding.disqus.com/challenge_web_culture_around_the_world_48/#comment-82901</link><description>Steve, I have just sent my own points on the internet usage in Russia. Great idea, I will be looking forward to seeing what you will have to publish as a result.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Svetlana Gladkova</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2008 08:53:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Technology Around The World: Svetlana Gladkova</title><link>http://sbspalding.disqus.com/technology_around_the_world_svetlana_gladkova_56/#comment-97957</link><description>Steve, it is really nice to see my comment to be the first one published in this series. And thank you for taking the time to find a very Russian photo for the post :)&lt;br&gt;I will be looking forward to seeing more comments from your readers around the world, really - you can only get to know many things from inside - so the more people share the experience, the more interesting it will be for all of us.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Svetlana Gladkova</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2008 03:25:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 5 Steps To Becoming More Productive This Afternoon</title><link>http://sbspalding.disqus.com/5_steps_to_becoming_more_productive_this_afternoon_72/#comment-159701</link><description>I agree with you 100% here Peter! I have all the electronic schedules, calendars and notifications configured to remind me of things that I have to do but I have found that the easiest way to actually complete tasks is to have them all written down on a piece of paper and striking them out when completed. I feel gorgeous when I have nothing left on the daily list in the evening :)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Svetlana Gladkova</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2008 08:56:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: You Can&amp;#039;t Charge For Twitter Popularity</title><link>http://andybeard.disqus.com/you_can039t_charge_for_twitter_popularity_37/#comment-10994658</link><description>Pretty comprehensive list of arguments here, Andy. And I do not think I would want Twitter to implement any monetization strategy  based on heavy users and the number of people they follow. The only trend I notice myself is that the majority of heavy users also rely on some desktop client to use Twitter more efficiently (of course, it is a nightmare to try using Twitter without it when you follow hundreds of people and actually want to engage in discussions with them) and a better idea would be to charge users for access to Twitter via API through some third-party application. Otherwise I would not want them to charge me based on the people I want to listen to. But I would not mind them charging me for extra comfort.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Svetlana Gladkova</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 07:09:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: You Can&amp;#039;t Charge For Twitter Popularity</title><link>http://andybeard.disqus.com/you_can039t_charge_for_twitter_popularity_37/#comment-12528975</link><description>Pretty comprehensive list of arguments here, Andy. And I do not think I would want Twitter to implement any monetization strategy  based on heavy users and the number of people they follow. The only trend I notice myself is that the majority of heavy users also rely on some desktop client to use Twitter more efficiently (of course, it is a nightmare to try using Twitter without it when you follow hundreds of people and actually want to engage in discussions with them) and a better idea would be to charge users for access to Twitter via API through some third-party application. Otherwise I would not want them to charge me based on the people I want to listen to. But I would not mind them charging me for extra comfort.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Svetlana Gladkova</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 07:09:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Diggers will find a way to get paid</title><link>http://mathewingram.disqus.com/diggers_will_find_a_way_to_get_paid/#comment-1306055</link><description>But taking money for submitting and promoting links on Digg actually violates Digg TOS. And Kevin Rose is free to delete any account - even that of a top user (for no reason at all) - if there is a hint from someone that this user violates Digg TOS. So why does not he do it?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Svetlana Gladkova</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 08 Dec 2006 03:04:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Where does community end and &amp;#8220;gaming&amp;#8221; start?</title><link>http://mathewingram.disqus.com/where_does_community_end_and_8220gaming8221_start/#comment-1310224</link><description>Thank you for mentioning Profy interview in your 2nd update, Mathew.&lt;br&gt;The terrible thing is that the only result Digg is going to get is losing some of its brilliant members - together with high-quality content they contribute. But will that actually improve Digg - I strongly doubt that.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Svetlana Gladkova</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 05 Feb 2007 05:47:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Where does community end and &amp;#8220;gaming&amp;#8221; start?</title><link>http://mathewingram.disqus.com/where_does_community_end_and_8220gaming8221_start/#comment-1310228</link><description>Mathew, I will be more than happy to be wrong - but I really see why Chrisek predicts top diggers will leave Digg. I enjoy Digg as an absolutely ordinary member but it is interesting to follow some trends in the community and progress of certain users - usually those you see frequently and start to recognize by their avatars.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Svetlana Gladkova</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 05 Feb 2007 13:04:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: My First $10,000 Paid Review- No Disclosure Required.</title><link>http://volodymyrzablotskyy.disqus.com/my_first_10000_paid_review_no_disclosure_required/#comment-1622131</link><description>Vlad, that's an interesting post and rather an outrageous behavior of the advertiser, I think. Have you thought about reporting the advertiser to Sponsored Reviews? If they establish the rules, I think they should at least try to make everyone (bloggers and advertisers) follow them - otherwise the rules will be pointless soon. I believe that at this level disclosure is not such a big issue: we all know of conflicts of interests some prominent bloggers have when they write reviews of the companies they partially own (or consult, for example). In such cases absence of disclosure notice can really be a big issue and can hardly damage reputation of a blogger concerned. But the reasons to hide the fact that the post is paid for in such a case is something I can hardly understand. Don't they require you to write only a positive review? That would have been a logical conclusion for them :)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Svetlana Gladkova</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2007 01:07:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: My First $10,000 Paid Review- No Disclosure Required.</title><link>http://volodymyrzablotskyy.disqus.com/my_first_10000_paid_review_no_disclosure_required/#comment-1622134</link><description>Vlad, I definitely agree that the disclosure is vital whatever the amount paid for the post is. I just meant that in some cases bloggers are not paid directly but they benefit in some other ways (by growth of the price of their stocks in the company they review positively, for instance) but such issues are often not disclosed (especially when the blogger is only affiliated with the reviewed company indirectly - via his wife or in some other way). And this can often be a bigger issue, that's what I meant.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Svetlana Gladkova</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 26 Jul 2007 01:34:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Owning my name in Google &amp;laquo;  My Thoughts On Social Media</title><link>http://michaelfruchter.disqus.com/owning_my_name_in_google_laquo_my_thoughts_on_social_media/#comment-5545782</link><description>Mike, very reasonable post, really a must-read for anyone just starting with personal branding. I remember in the early days of Profy I did not bother to register accounts named "profy" everywhere I could but now I am most certain to at least add some basic information to any new service launched and forget it if I don&amp;#39;t see traction enough to justify my efforts to keep it active. And even if you don&amp;#39;t really get any search traffic, it will at the very least provide an extra incoming link or two.&lt;br&gt;&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;P.S. Thanks for the link, by the way :)&lt;/br&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Svetlana Gladkova</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2008 11:55:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: What is Twitter worth to you?</title><link>http://frumpa.disqus.com/what_is_twitter_worth_to_you/#comment-1591792</link><description>I have added my vote to the $5/month variant simply because I strongly believe in paying for services that I use for business - for example, this is why we have chosen to pay for Akismet on our blog even though no one insisted we should. But the problem with Twitter is that I don't think that with more money they will be able to make it reliable - after all, it is a relatively well funded startup and the problems don't seem to be due to lack of funding.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Svetlana Gladkova</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 07 Jun 2008 08:21:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Facebook to Start Letting Employees Sell Shares</title><link>http://socialtimes.disqus.com/facebook_to_start_letting_employees_sell_shares/#comment-1575157</link><description>I'm not sure about one thing: if I choose to buy some stocks at the internal $4 billion valuation and taking into account the official $15 billion valuation based on the latest investment from Microsoft, where exactly will the valuation be when I eventually decide to sell that stock? Will it stay at the $4 billion, grow closer to $15 billion or instead drop further?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Svetlana Gladkova</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2008 03:43:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Facebook Furthers Attack on FriendFeed, Adds Comments to News Feed</title><link>http://allfacebook.disqus.com/facebook_furthers_attack_on_friendfeed_adds_comments_to_news_feed/#comment-1640943</link><description>Yes, this new addition definitely puts FriendFeed in direct competition with Facebook but what I think is good about this is the fact that Facebook actually has the power to bring lifestreaming to a mainstream level, while FriendFeed (no matter how much I love it) simply has no such power.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Svetlana Gladkova</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 14:27:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Facebook Rolls Out Newsfeed Filters</title><link>http://allfacebook.disqus.com/facebook_rolls_out_newsfeed_filters/#comment-1641027</link><description>I think filters will become even more useful when we are able to apply multiple filters simultaneously - like to see updates from FriendFeed for a certain friends list.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Svetlana Gladkova</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2008 10:14:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: SocialVibe&amp;#8217;s Members Raised Over $100,000</title><link>http://sociableblog.disqus.com/socialvibe8217s_members_raised_over_100000/#comment-3590483</link><description>This all sounds very good but I actually have a concern about the whole announcement. Don't you feel that 100 thousand of raised donations is a little too small compared to $4.2 million of VC they raised for the company itself?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Svetlana Gladkova</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 08:58:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Skype Connector Added to Imo.im</title><link>http://sociableblog.disqus.com/skype_connector_added_to_imoim/#comment-3590493</link><description>Have you tried the functionality yourself? I have tried and it really failed on a number of calls so it's definitely an honest alpha. But I like their approach to combining all the major IM clients plus chats in social networks on one service.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Svetlana Gladkova</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2008 08:14:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Small mini rant for Sunday</title><link>http://benwaynet.disqus.com/small_mini_rant_for_sunday/#comment-12507788</link><description>I guess this is a problem for many bloggers - as soon as you get some readers and pagerank they begin to chase popular posts to add a link (with some of them even trying to overcome the no-follow tag for their links). But I think the poor quality of comments is totally understandable - I&amp;#039;ve seen people offering to buy comments in batch for mere cents on forums for webmasters. I only wonder if there&amp;#039;s some information on how many of such crappy comments get approved and how many are sorted out like spam as I guess many bloggers are less generous than you are.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Svetlana Gladkova</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 05:26:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 2007/06/29/mashphone/</title><link>http://mashable.disqus.com/thread_27151/#comment-5953268</link><description>How about getting an iPhone absolutely for free first? Here you will find &lt;a href="http://www.profy.com/2007/06/18/profy-iphone-competition/" rel="nofollow"&gt;the conditions&lt;/a&gt;.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Svetlana Gladkova</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 29 Jun 2007 06:15:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 2008/05/19/lycos-webo/</title><link>http://mashable.disqus.com/thread_64458/#comment-6003825</link><description>It is definitely an interesting development, especially interesting to me as an owner of Profy, another new blogging platform that seems to do pretty much similar things for a novice blogger. But the trend is obvious - many of us notice that there is a need for a new type of blogging platform, something that makes blogging simpler for users with new mainstream users arriving.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The only problem that I see here is that the $9 per month seems to be too expensive for the target demographic.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Svetlana Gladkova</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 04:31:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 2008/05/20/milblogging/</title><link>http://mashable.disqus.com/thread_2560/#comment-6004073</link><description>The irony of the move is that from what I've read they only want to allow blogging on the domains they control (I guess this is what .mil domain mean, right?). I can hardly believe that they will tolerate personnel blogging on free blogging platforms like &lt;a href="http://Blogger.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;Blogger.com&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://Wordpress.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;Wordpress.com&lt;/a&gt; or our very own recently launched &lt;a href="http://Profy.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;Profy.com&lt;/a&gt;. And I myself don't really believe in free speech when the host is controlled. So it will be a pretty well controlled social media - losing its nature. But you are right, it will serve well to deliver the message they want to deliver - though hardly the message people want to get by reading blogs written by military personnel.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Svetlana Gladkova</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 01:14:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 2008/05/26/google-death-2/</title><link>http://mashable.disqus.com/thread_02771/#comment-6004818</link><description>I tend to agree with the last paragraph of your post - after all, Google is a search engine, not a search judge. And if they ever have any intention of actually checking every indexed story for credibility and truthfulness, they will be absolutely buried in tons of work arriving every minute. I believe, they do the job of indexing the web and presenting us with the results quite well - and we should not expect more from them. Everyone is free to judge how credible every single story is and the company that promotes itself by publishing (and getting links to) a false story, it just should not (and I hope will not) work in terms of building a reputation for the company. While what do the companies look for when handling an online marketing campaign? Reputation, I think, and no reputation can be built with such tactics.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Svetlana Gladkova</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 00:39:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 2008/06/01/is-the-bay-area-overrated/</title><link>http://mashable.disqus.com/thread_35356/#comment-6005425</link><description>Pete, congrats on your two months in the Valley. And you know, no matter how reasonable you tried to sound about the fact that your unique perspective (like Profy's Russian one) can be your great advantage, I think the majority of the startups will still make the decision to move as soon as they can because you have given just the right reasons for why you should love the Valley - for being able to talk about Web 2.0 right on the street and giving real faces to your email contacts. Encouraging post!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Svetlana Gladkova</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2008 01:36:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 2008/06/04/renting-twitter-path-to-profitability/</title><link>http://mashable.disqus.com/thread_88053/#comment-6005923</link><description>The problem I see with this approach of monetizing Twitter accounts (and yes, possibly monetizing Twitter if any power users will agree to participate in revenue sharing with Twitter) is that the property offered does not seem to provide any real value to the advertiser. The background image is large but why would I need to visit pages of people I follow after actually subscribing to them? I don't know, maybe if I need to find something important on their pages while I was offline, but that really happens rarely. Thumbnail images sound better to me - at least they are shown even when the followers read the tweets in a desktop client like Twhirl. But in addition to them being tiny and, thus, only suitable for icons, rarely logos, they don't really allow for the only option that could add value in terms of traffic to the advertiser's page - linking back to the page. So if I was thinking about advertising my company like this, I'd really need to think it twice as it only works to a certain extent for brand awareness, not traffic.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Svetlana Gladkova</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2008 03:10:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Blogger Adds Slew of New Features</title><link>http://mashable.disqus.com/blogger_adds_slew_of_new_features/#comment-6008862</link><description>Interesting, finally something from Google related to Blogger. I actually thought they forgot they had the property at all. Interesting to see what the bloggers will think about it once it is rolled out for everyone.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Svetlana Gladkova</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 07:46:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 2008/07/18/google-buys-russian-contextual-ad-service-begun/</title><link>http://mashable.disqus.com/thread_89685/#comment-6011833</link><description>Stan, Begun is actually the leading player in the Russian contextual advertising market (I'd say the only one but I suspect some other exist that no one is aware of) so it's definitely for the market share (I'd call it a monopoly even). Moreover, Begun is very excited that they will be able to use Google's technology for contextual ads serving. What Google is looking here for is definitely the ability to reach Russian audience at all as it is very complicated to use AdSense here in Russia. (More on it in my own post on the subject at &lt;a href="http://www.profy.com/2008/07/18/google-buys-begun-russian-contextual-ads/" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.profy.com/2008/07/18/google-buys-beg...&lt;/a&gt;.)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Svetlana Gladkova</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 08:33:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 2008/07/25/google-begun-financial-results/</title><link>http://mashable.disqus.com/thread_48221/#comment-6013030</link><description>I guess Google simply has a better nose for advertising market - otherwise it would not have been the leader.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Svetlana Gladkova</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 09:08:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 2008/07/25/google-begun-financial-results/</title><link>http://mashable.disqus.com/thread_48221/#comment-6013033</link><description>Probably not many but if it is only available in Russian, should we avoid covering such news on English-language blogs?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Svetlana Gladkova</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 09:47:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 2008/07/07/babbel/</title><link>http://mashable.disqus.com/thread_4155/#comment-6009913</link><description>It is interesting to see where the company chooses to take its development further now that it has raised its first round of funding today. As a person deeply concerned with all the things related to learning languages, I do think the better approach would be to try to lose the "playful" image and build a truly useful tool for everyone, including language professionals that could also generate some revenue for the site.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Svetlana Gladkova</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 14:59:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 2008/07/31/facebook-news-feed-filters/</title><link>http://mashable.disqus.com/thread_73123/#comment-6013697</link><description>I love the new tabs myself - the only thing that still seem to be missing is a tab to aggregate all the activities of my friends with various applications. This would have provided another source of interesting content (the way FriendFeed does) and it would probably familiarized a lot more people with lifestreaming.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Svetlana Gladkova</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 12:04:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 2008/07/31/facebook-news-feed-filters/</title><link>http://mashable.disqus.com/thread_73123/#comment-6013699</link><description>Yes, adding a way to filter what apps should get preference definitely makes sense as well. As of now the potential to aggregate all types of content on Facebook is huge and I think it will be only logical if they implement it.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Svetlana Gladkova</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 12:15:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 2008/07/31/facebook-news-feed-filters/</title><link>http://mashable.disqus.com/thread_73123/#comment-6013701</link><description>Yes, that one could also be a big advantage - though I guess I'd have to spend quite some time making my choice. Probably I'd choose the same status updates but in my case this is more to watch Twitter updates from my closer friends than the entire timeline.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Svetlana Gladkova</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 13:50:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 2008/08/01/profy-editorial-staff-quits/</title><link>http://mashable.disqus.com/thread_17848/#comment-6013844</link><description>Mark, I have published my version of the story at &lt;a href="http://www.profy.com/2008/08/02/editorial-changes-on-profy/" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.profy.com/2008/08/02/editorial-chang...&lt;/a&gt;.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Svetlana Gladkova</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 Aug 2008 08:18:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 2008/08/06/mozilla-snowl/</title><link>http://mashable.disqus.com/thread_8728/#comment-6014419</link><description>I don't really understand what all the fuss is about. No messaging for now with only possibility to add it some time in the future. And the same multi-tasking, only you don't have to switch between apps, you switch between tabs.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Svetlana Gladkova</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 09:09:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 2008/08/11/russia-georgia-cyberattacks/</title><link>http://mashable.disqus.com/thread_14720/#comment-6014986</link><description>Steven, thank you for bringing the situation to the Mashable audience. It is an important issue that we see internet as a new theater of war these days but I personally don't think it is really all that important: all our online lives are worth way much less than a real life of one child actually killed in the conflict. Don't you think so?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Svetlana Gladkova</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 01:58:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 2008/08/13/social-hacking/</title><link>http://mashable.disqus.com/thread_71665/#comment-6015264</link><description>Steven, excellent post this one is. The only thing I wanted to mention is that social media is equally capable of manipulating the crowds both for bad and for GOOD. And for Russians the CNN poll was actually a good cause to help the world see what people really see about the conflict. If it were for a bad cause people would have been much harder to manipulate and no one would have been able to initiate such a viral campaign if people did not believe in the cause.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Svetlana Gladkova</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2008 05:24:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 2008/08/20/socialmedian-twitter-fundraising/</title><link>http://mashable.disqus.com/thread_90801/#comment-6016316</link><description>I think the problem here is that we think that web 2.0 business is something of a large playground and often forget to think about serious issues like legislation when we can simply achieve our goals on social media sites.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Svetlana Gladkova</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 04:31:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 2008/09/02/social-media-behavior-101-soon-a-required-course/</title><link>http://mashable.disqus.com/thread_51691/#comment-6018078</link><description>Excellent points about this behavior caused simply by kids natural inclination to exuberance when in college. But hopefully kids will finally realize that in this era the evidence of such exuberance should better be kept private whenever possible.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Svetlana Gladkova</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 10:44:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 2008/09/10/flickr-redesign/</title><link>http://mashable.disqus.com/thread_70408/#comment-6019199</link><description>I actually think that the added ability to customize exactly what blocks you get on the homepage is also an important one - finally I'll be able to hide my own photos.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Svetlana Gladkova</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2008 06:46:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 2008/09/22/timespeople/</title><link>http://mashable.disqus.com/thread_3665/#comment-6020188</link><description>Good suggestion on a social network for a group of newspapers, could make better sense here. After all, I would not say that NYTimes overloads us with the number of articles that we could really need a recommendation engine. What's more, it could be better off as an application for Facebook or LinkedIn (better yet) instead of making us build yet another network of friends.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Svetlana Gladkova</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2008 06:02:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: LA Earthquake: Twitter Reports First - Again. Fake Video Caught.</title><link>http://zoliblog.disqus.com/la_earthquake_twitter_reports_first_again_fake_video_caught/#comment-5640003</link><description>Great summary: we have to stop praise Twitter for its ability to break news faster or to sympathize to AP because they can't be as fast. We do need both - Twitter for breaking news and mainstream media for in-depth coverage. They do different job and they both do it well. And we in the tech blogosphere often forget that there are lots of people on Earth who still get their news in a traditional way - from TV or newspapers and have no idea of what Twitter is at all.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Svetlana Gladkova</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 02:53:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: LA Earthquake: Twitter Reports First &amp;#8211; Again. Fake Video Caught.</title><link>http://zoliblog.disqus.com/la_earthquake_twitter_reports_first_8211_again_fake_video_caught/#comment-15822240</link><description>Great summary: we have to stop praise Twitter for its ability to break news faster or to sympathize to AP because they can't be as fast. We do need both - Twitter for breaking news and mainstream media for in-depth coverage. They do different job and they both do it well. And we in the tech blogosphere often forget that there are lots of people on Earth who still get their news in a traditional way - from TV or newspapers and have no idea of what Twitter is at all.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Svetlana Gladkova</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 02:53:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Earthquakes, Google Juice and How Content Beats AdWords</title><link>http://zoliblog.disqus.com/earthquakes_google_juice_and_how_content_beats_adwords/#comment-5639984</link><description>That's a number of impressive examples. I often find unexpected search terms in the logs as well and can't help but feel pity for the readers who found something very tech-related instead of the information they were actually looking for. But are you hinting at a need for a new algorithm here?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Svetlana Gladkova</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 03:43:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Earthquakes, Google Juice and How Content Beats AdWords</title><link>http://zoliblog.disqus.com/earthquakes_google_juice_and_how_content_beats_adwords_50/#comment-15822202</link><description>That's a number of impressive examples. I often find unexpected search terms in the logs as well and can't help but feel pity for the readers who found something very tech-related instead of the information they were actually looking for. But are you hinting at a need for a new algorithm here?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Svetlana Gladkova</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 03:43:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: SaaS is an Ancient Model</title><link>http://zoliblog.disqus.com/saas_is_an_ancient_model/#comment-5640076</link><description>Zoli, I have the same situation on Profy with the same 38 years :) It looks like all the blogs hosted either on &lt;a href="http://wordpress.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;wordpress.com&lt;/a&gt; or blogspot have the same strange glitch.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Svetlana Gladkova</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 09:17:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: SaaS is an Ancient Model</title><link>http://zoliblog.disqus.com/saas_is_an_ancient_model_22/#comment-15822353</link><description>Zoli, I have the same situation on Profy with the same 38 years :) It looks like all the blogs hosted either on &lt;a href="http://wordpress.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;wordpress.com&lt;/a&gt; or blogspot have the same strange glitch.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Svetlana Gladkova</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 09:17:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google Layoffs May Affect 30k Workers. Sort of&amp;hellip;</title><link>http://zoliblog.disqus.com/google_layoffs_may_affect_30k_workers_sort_ofhellip/#comment-5640256</link><description>Definitely a step too far (or maybe even a couple of steps) but that does not really mean the discussion is not needed, I think - at least now everyone knows Google has 10k contractors and will probably turn to them to cut costs now. But of course it does not mean all 10k people will be simply let go while to me these stories are simply a good indication of the fact that even Google needs to behave reasonably in a recession.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Svetlana Gladkova</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 01:24:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google Layoffs May Affect 30k Workers. Sort of&amp;#8230;</title><link>http://zoliblog.disqus.com/google_layoffs_may_affect_30k_workers_sort_of8230/#comment-15822664</link><description>Definitely a step too far (or maybe even a couple of steps) but that does not really mean the discussion is not needed, I think - at least now everyone knows Google has 10k contractors and will probably turn to them to cut costs now. But of course it does not mean all 10k people will be simply let go while to me these stories are simply a good indication of the fact that even Google needs to behave reasonably in a recession.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Svetlana Gladkova</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 01:24:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Musicians Play for Tips- The Importance of Comments</title><link>http://chrisbrogan.disqus.com/musicians_play_for_tips_the_importance_of_comments/#comment-8521263</link><description>Chris, actually I'm not sure it's only the matter of time. I tend to think that I should only comment if I actually have something useful to add to conversation - simply typing "Great post, keep up the great work" does not seem like a good option and I don't think any blogger actually enjoys this type of comments. So I may well have time to leave a comment but I don't feel there's something actually useful to say - especially when I agree with the author (I think people almost invariably comment when they notice and error). But this is exactly when I choose to share the post on SU, FriendFeed, Facebook - it shows appreciation to the blogger and does not require thinking up something to say when you actually 100% agree.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Svetlana Gladkova</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2008 06:55:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Musicians Play for Tips- The Importance of Comments</title><link>http://chrisbrogan.disqus.com/musicians_play_for_tips_the_importance_of_comments/#comment-8521270</link><description>@Ulla: You yourself mention that you prefer to leave more detailed comments - even though I insist that you like simple patting on your back. So don't you think it's just logical that other readers prefer to only say something when they have something to say as well?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Good point about hesitating to comment as a not native English speaker. I am not one myself and this used to be one of my major concerns - until I realized that some bloggers actually prefer to receive a comment with a couple of linguistic defects than no comment at all.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Svetlana Gladkova</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2008 07:44:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: PitchEngine Launches- I Might Have a Plan</title><link>http://chrisbrogan.disqus.com/pitchengine_launches_i_might_have_a_plan/#comment-8522243</link><description>Thank you for mentioning PitchEngine, I have tested it myself for some time and it does look like having a good potential. I can see some additions that could be added to really improve the relations between PR and media.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Svetlana Gladkova</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2008 14:20:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: When Google Owns You</title><link>http://chrisbrogan.disqus.com/when_google_owns_you/#comment-8522516</link><description>Good to see it has been resolved but I think that this incident should make us all rethink our complete reliance on Google services for many of our professional or personal tasks. I think some level of diversification should be used to make it all more reasonable.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Svetlana Gladkova</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 02:28:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: gOoops (Beta)</title><link>http://mobilitysite.disqus.com/gooops_beta/#comment-8553135</link><description>Pretty clear summary of the situation but still I can not agree with you 100% about the first part (the Android one, I mean). The developers may be frustrated about the recent events but there are plenty of things for them to complain about Apple's platform as well (we have had a comparison published by Cyndy, link under my name) so I would not have been so sure Apple is all good and Google is all evil, really.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But the situation with 23andMe is more disappointing. Even if not illegal, it still looks rather strange and even when the company was initially launched, I had my concerns about it since via the direct affiliation between the two companies Google will have genetic information about us and I am already uncomfortable about everything Google already knows about me.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Svetlana Gladkova</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2008 01:31:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: gOoops (Beta)</title><link>http://mobilitysite.disqus.com/gooops_beta/#comment-8553138</link><description>Definitely Google's behavior on this issue is pretty strange and I do believe the developers must be worried about this attitude. But I don't think this wrong move means that Android has no chances and all the developers will quickly move to iPhone simply because iPhone's platform is not perfect and has its own flaws as well.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Svetlana Gladkova</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 04:27:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: What if I sold ads here?</title><link>http://scobleizer.disqus.com/what_if_i_sold_ads_here/#comment-9658600</link><description>Me personally I don't understand your torments. Is it all about ethics? You do something brilliantly, people use it (and some of them even gain profit by quoting your posts and bringing traffic to their own blogs), you are a professional and a profession is supposed to bring you money. And who cares how you use it?&lt;br&gt;Anyway it happened that there are so many bloggers out there with the most interesting subjects being earning money by blogging and monetizing their blogs. Everyone launches blogs to earn money. Why hesitating when you already have a successful blog?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Svetlana Gladkova</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 30 Oct 2006 06:34:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Bloggers: you getting copied? Sentinel is your solutions</title><link>http://scobleizer.disqus.com/bloggers_you_getting_copied_sentinel_is_your_solutions/#comment-9669631</link><description>But knowing who steels my content is not everything - and definitely it is not enough to shut down the websites. Example: I know who is steeling our content, I went to the website with lots of Amazon ads and no contacts, I was looking for the owner everywhere and finally had to go to his provider. But that did not help, either. They still steel our posts - even interviews and such (very personal things, I mean).&lt;br&gt;So now that I know even earlier - will it actually help me?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Svetlana Gladkova</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 02 Feb 2007 07:41:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A new search engine appears: will you use it?</title><link>http://scobleizer.disqus.com/a_new_search_engine_appears_will_you_use_it/#comment-9708122</link><description>Very good point on the distribution, Robert. It is always interesting to see startups launch with an idea of offering something better (and we have already seen to many arguments to prove it is not better) and more scalable without thinking of distribution. Cuil talks about privacy issues without realizing that their approach is only appealing for a small crowd of early adopters. And the fact that this engine is different does not mean that it is better. So before distributing your product to the masses you have to make sure you are much better than the existing competition. And $33 million does not sound like enough both for the infrastructure and efficient distribution.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Svetlana Gladkova</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 07:55:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Warning: Hackers Using Sexy Girls to Infect Twitter Users</title><link>http://marketingpilgrim.disqus.com/warning_hackers_using_sexy_girls_to_infect_twitter_users/#comment-9431812</link><description>Andy, I don't think that there's a chance of catching the virus by simply looking at the profile or following it - from what I've read on Kaspersky Lab's blog you need to click the link in the tweets from that account to start downloading the trojan. It's very similar to fishing emails and general spam - you are safe unless you click the links.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And the tweets have been deleted from the account already (though I don't see why the account itself still exists).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;em&gt;Svetlana Gladkova's last blog post..&lt;a href="http://www.profy.com/2008/08/05/twitter-gets-more-malicious-ways-to-hurt-you-viruses/#comment-1202151" rel="nofollow"&gt;by: Svetlana Gladkova&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Svetlana Gladkova</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2008 12:10:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google News:  Old News</title><link>http://marketingpilgrim.disqus.com/google_news_old_news/#comment-9432867</link><description>Excellent title for the post and I'm glad I'm not the only one this enthusiastic about the announcement. I guess the only people showing enthusiasm are those that studied university at college or university and spent way too much time with file folders of newspapers :)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;em&gt;Svetlana Gladkova's last blog post..&lt;a href="http://profy.com/2008/09/09/google-scans-newspapers-great-initiative-historians/" rel="nofollow"&gt;Google Comes Up With a Great Initiative for Historians - Scans Old Newspapers&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Svetlana Gladkova</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2008 04:16:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google Has Rogue Agents In Russia?</title><link>http://tinycomb.disqus.com/google_has_rogue_agents_in_russia/#comment-11752396</link><description>Well, the obvious suggestion is that Google is not that capable to work in Russia efficiently while another major company working in contextual advertising - Yandex (the search engine and portal that is pondering an IPO for some time next year) - obviously understands the realities here much better. But that is just a theory, no proof or evidence of this!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Svetlana Gladkova</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2008 05:36:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: SES San Jose: Keynote with Microsoft&amp;#8217;s Satya Nadella</title><link>http://toprankblog.disqus.com/ses_san_jose_keynote_with_microsoft8217s_satya_nadella/#comment-17133587</link><description>I actually think Microsoft is quite correct in determining the existing problems and the tools to compete with current leaders. But what they seem to fail to notice is that while they are trying to catch up with the competitors as they are now, Google and Yahoo won't be stable and by the time Microsoft new search tools are ready, the company will have very different competitors already and will probably need to catch up again.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Svetlana Gladkova</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 04:00:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Amazon Does the Obvious, Finally: Adds Video on IMDb</title><link>http://paidcontent.disqus.com/amazon_does_the_obvious_finally_adds_video_on_imdb/#comment-18826123</link><description>@Geo: Well, that&amp;#39;s the advantage of at least being in the US and able to consume those videos for free :)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Svetlana Gladkova</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2008 07:10:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Friendster Closes $20 Million Round; Focuses On Asia Now; New CEO</title><link>http://paidcontent.disqus.com/friendster_closes_20_million_round_focuses_on_asia_now_new_ceo/#comment-18831957</link><description>I do believe it&amp;#39;s a great news for Friendster and it is also a pleasure looking at the web companies learning to adopt to new conditions - Friendster failed in the US market and instead of trying harder it simply moved to another place where it seems to be more welcomed.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Svetlana Gladkova</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2008 15:01:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: With No IPO On Horizon, Facebook And LinkedIn Let Employees Sell Some Shares Early: Report</title><link>http://paidcontent.disqus.com/with_no_ipo_on_horizon_facebook_and_linkedin_let_employees_sell_some_shares_early_report/#comment-18831980</link><description>What I still fail to understand is why LinkedIn is valuated this much lower than Facebook with a comparable revenue (and a more diverse range of revenue sources) and a more steady business model.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Svetlana Gladkova</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2008 07:24:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google&amp;#39;s Russian Ad Buy Blocked On Technicality; Putin&amp;#39;s Spanner In The Works?</title><link>http://paidcontent.disqus.com/google39s_russian_ad_buy_blocked_on_technicality_putin39s_spanner_in_the_works/#comment-18832709</link><description>Small correction: our Russian president is not Putin any more, it is Medvedev while Putin serves as a Prime Minister.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Svetlana Gladkova</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2008 04:32:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Language Learning Community Babbel Funded For Growth</title><link>http://paidcontent.disqus.com/language_learning_community_babbel_funded_for_growth/#comment-18837511</link><description>I have a problem with the &amp;quot;playful&amp;quot; image of the product and I do hope that the funding is significant enough for them to overcome it and become an ultimate language learning destination for everyone, including language professionals (that could also generate some profit for the company if it chooses to charge for premium services).</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Svetlana Gladkova</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 19:02:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Newspapers Cope With Ad Slowdown: Hold Back On Inventory And Ad Nets</title><link>http://paidcontent.disqus.com/newspapers_cope_with_ad_slowdown_hold_back_on_inventory_and_ad_nets/#comment-18843089</link><description>I think we should not really link this particular fall to the economic meltdown only - another important reason is how newspapers handle advertising on their own sites, how they rely on CPM mostly (which will certainly be viewed by many advertisers as a potential loss). There are many things to that and of course the online advertising industry will need serious restructuring but that does not mean every type of publishers will be damaged equally.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Svetlana Gladkova</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 10:27:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Facebook users from outside the U.S. are spammers!</title><link>http://pauloflaherty.disqus.com/facebook_users_from_outside_the_us_are_spammers/#comment-20357601</link><description>Paul,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I'm not sure but I thought it was possible to verify your phone even if you are not in the US? At least here in Russia I got some message from FB to my cell with a verification number that worked quite fine. Maybe I verified something else (confused)?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;As for discrimination, you would have felt it even more if based in Russia :) You know, we are unable to purchase from descent e-stores (and, honestly, I don't think we have descent Russian-language ones) as our credit cards are not accepted. And you know, we also have the send-only PayPal accounts to prevent us from getting the money from abroad easily and civilized as the rest of the world does :) I could have put much more items into this list though I don't think it is actually needed - suffice to say the part of the world that is not North America is severely discriminated online. Poor we :)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Svetlana Gladkova</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2007 04:59:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Chrome beat Opera &amp;#8211; IE is next!! No really, it&amp;#8217;s true I tells ya!</title><link>http://pauloflaherty.disqus.com/chrome_beat_opera_8211_ie_is_next_no_really_it8217s_true_i_tells_ya/#comment-20358709</link><description>Kind of uncomfortable to be quoted here as a tech site with the highest share of Chrome users along with failing to notice Chrome is only used by early adopters now. In fact, I mentioned Chrome would be for the early adopters right in my first review of it and I was totally right. And I was joking with my market share of Chrome on Profy post since I know it is only used by early adopters now and the majority of them arrive to the posts about Chrome itself - tech blogs have published a dozen of posts about Chrome each and they get hundreds of visits to their Chrome-related posts.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Besides, I think all the tech blogs I've seen mentioning their Chrome share actually mentioned the appeal of Chrome to the early adopters.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Svetlana Gladkova</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 04:38:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Chrome beat Opera &amp;#8211; IE is next!! No really, it&amp;#8217;s true I tells ya!</title><link>http://pauloflaherty.disqus.com/chrome_beat_opera_8211_ie_is_next_no_really_it8217s_true_i_tells_ya/#comment-20358712</link><description>@Paul: Thanks a lot for the update, appreciate it. You know, I have started to receive comments on Profy from other bloggers claiming to have over half visitors to their blog from Chrome already. But a quick look shows that their sites are newly-launched blogs about Chrome - and when you write about Chrome, you get lots of Chrome visitors, just logical. I hope people will soon realize that and stop bragging about Chrome market share rapid growth - I'll believe it when I see mainstream users adopt it equally rapidly at the very least.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Svetlana Gladkova</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 07:08:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: You&amp;#8217;re An Attention Whore And You Know It</title><link>http://pauloflaherty.disqus.com/you8217re_an_attention_whore_and_you_know_it/#comment-20359112</link><description>LOL Paul, as usual I did not want to go and tell the entire truth (I am a blogger, after all, so I am not supposed to tell all the truth regarding this particular thing) but you have obviously done it for me here. I admit it: nothing feels better than a quote in NYT or Business Week :)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Svetlana Gladkova</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 04:09:13 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>