<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for Matt Cline</title><link>http://disqus.com/people/4c38042958dba3d273f5bd88ed187d5b/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 May 2006 11:45:00 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Video Placebo: Is that Really HDTV You Are Watching?</title><link>http://tlf.disqus.com/video_placebo_is_that_really_hdtv_you_are_watching/#comment-1444766</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;br&gt;Heh, amusing idea.&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;br&gt;That said, we got a new HD-ready 30" CRT about 6 months ago. We aren't getting HD signal yet, but we needed a new TV and figured that anything worth getting should be HD-ready. And damned if this sucker doesn't display regular, standard-def TV sharper than I've ever seen it. Yeah, it's 480i, but it looks a helluva lot better than my mother-in-law's 2-year-old non-HD-ready TV.&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;br&gt;So I don't think this is entirely placebo. This HD-ready set has better video quality even at SD resolution.&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Matt Cline</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2005 18:11:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The SlingBox, Space-Shifting and the Future of Broadcasting</title><link>http://tlf.disqus.com/the_slingbox_space_shifting_and_the_future_of_broadcasting/#comment-1445041</link><description>Personally, I can't stand most local news.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Some D.C. local news is OK. But here in Madison WI, local news *sucks*. I've not been terribly impressed with Chicago's local news either.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If local broadcast affiliates die, I for one won't shed a tear. Having a TV station locally adds no value for me.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Matt Cline</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2006 14:43:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Television Wants to be Free</title><link>http://tlf.disqus.com/television_wants_to_be_free/#comment-1445313</link><description>Actually, product placement is starting to fall out of favor with a lot of marketers. The reason is very simple: it doesn't seem to do any good.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Matt Cline</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 20 Mar 2006 09:47:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: We&amp;#8217;re All PC Users Now</title><link>http://tlf.disqus.com/we8217re_all_pc_users_now/#comment-1445453</link><description>MikeT:&lt;br&gt;Actually, BootCamp is not "hosting" Windows at all. BootCamp sets up Intel Macs to dual-boot. You can hold down a key on the keyboard to choose between Windows and Mac OS.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;By "hosting", you seem to be thinking about something like Virtual PC. That's another valid approach to running Windows on a Mac, but it's not what BootCamp does.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Developing an API compatibility layer is a *huge* job. (Among many other reasons, the Windows APIs are moving targets.) And it's not at all clear to me that it's in Apple's interests anyway.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Matt Cline</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 06 Apr 2006 11:00:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: OJ Simpson Open Source</title><link>http://tlf.disqus.com/oj_simpson_open_source/#comment-1445502</link><description>&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;br&gt;Surely that's better than a market where only a few, rich corporations have total control over the DRM.&lt;br&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;You think Sun is poor?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Matt Cline</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 17 Apr 2006 09:38:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Technology Liberation Front  &amp;raquo; Archive   &amp;raquo; How Net Neutrality Regs Could Threaten Online High-Def Video</title><link>http://tlf.disqus.com/the_technology_liberation_front_raquo_archive_raquo_how_net_neutrality_regs_could_threaten_online_high_def_video/#comment-1445738</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;br&gt;Wow, Barry, you haven't been reading TLF very long, have you? :) I ask because plenty of posts here have gone into some detail about what's wrong with NN regulation. In brief:&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;br&gt;You say that ISPs will abuse their customers. Find me a case where this has actually happened. There's only one that I know of, a small-fry shop in North Carolina, and the matter was quickly settled. If anti-competitive behavior by ISPs becomes a widespread problem, then yes we should take steps to remedy it. &lt;i&gt;But&lt;/i&gt; it's not a problem right now. Why solve a problem that doesn't exist? Don't we have enough work to do solving problems that &lt;i&gt;already&lt;/i&gt; exist?&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;br&gt;We have no NN regulation right now. If ISPs were going to abuse their customers as you describe, &lt;i&gt;why aren't they doing it already?&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;br&gt;Furthermore, we &lt;i&gt;already&lt;/i&gt; have a "truly competitive marketplace in telecommunications and entertainment". At least, the market is more competitive than it has been in, like, &lt;i&gt;ever&lt;/i&gt;. NN regulation likely won't make the market more competitive. If existing communications regulations are any guide, it will make the market &lt;i&gt;less&lt;/i&gt; competitive.&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Matt Cline</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 09 May 2006 11:45:00 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>