<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for Dmitriy Kruglyak</title><link>http://disqus.com/people/4b63d3a454cc6104c1f623689e4901e5/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2008 20:31:35 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Resume Driven Development (RDD)</title><link>http://healthcareguy.disqus.com/resume_driven_development_rdd/#comment-22242710</link><description>I think the most important thing is for development managers and senior execs to recognize the issue and make the decisions accordingly.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Recognition of "RDD bias" should be only one of the factors in the choice of technology, but of course not the only one.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dmitriy Kruglyak</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 26 Jan 2007 06:49:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Resume Driven Development (RDD)</title><link>http://healthcareguy.disqus.com/resume_driven_development_rdd/#comment-22242697</link><description>You hit the bullseye, Shahid!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I love the acronym.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dmitriy Kruglyak</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 20 Jan 2007 14:52:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: HIMMS interested in bloggers, blogging, and social networking</title><link>http://healthcareguy.disqus.com/himms_interested_in_bloggers_blogging_and_social_networking/#comment-22242498</link><description>Let's be sure we get the key HIMSS folks attend our innaugural &lt;a href="http://www.healthvoices.com/conference" rel="nofollow"&gt;Healthcare Blogging Summit 2006&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;This should be just the place to give them a good overview of what they need to be thinking about, leaving enough time to prepare for HIMSS 2007.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Aside from this, I think HIMSS needs to treat bloggers as fully accredited press.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dmitriy Kruglyak</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 15 Jul 2006 01:47:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Ken Kizer, CEO of Medsphere and former top VA official, pitches open source medical software to Congress</title><link>http://healthcareguy.disqus.com/ken_kizer_ceo_of_medsphere_and_former_top_va_official_pitches_open_source_medical_software_to_congre/#comment-22242471</link><description>I think lack of licensing fees is only one of the benefits of open source.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;A far more important point is collaborative software development, through the power of community. When it works, this means greater software quality and never needing another source code escrow clause. Plus things like sharing of best practice processes, templates, etc.etc.etc. Things that are taken for granted in Linux-land but are barely known in health IT. How many times different IT departments end up doing the same HL7 interface over and over again?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The real viability of open source health IT will be tested by whether a viable development community with real spirit of collaboration can emerge.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dmitriy Kruglyak</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 11 Apr 2006 23:31:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Medical Blog Network vs. Lynch Mob</title><link>http://healthcareguy.disqus.com/medical_blog_network_vs_lynch_mob/#comment-22242447</link><description>Sure, this is not the last case and there is always argument about applicability of any precedent.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Words like "temporary" and "excerpts" mean nothing. We all know that Google caches everything in full forever, but looks like they successfully argued that dropping a few little pieces of a page creates "excerpts". I can as well say that even the "full" posts are excerpts too, since they do not include the entire blog site scaffolding.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;USENET postings and RSS feeds have more in common than you think. Both are published by the author with explicit intent for distribution.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But this is the matter from purely legalistic perspective. I do not find it worth a fight.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dmitriy Kruglyak</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 18 Mar 2006 17:21:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Medical Blog Network vs. Lynch Mob</title><link>http://healthcareguy.disqus.com/medical_blog_network_vs_lynch_mob/#comment-22242445</link><description>Carsten,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;You can argue legal points all you want. The problem is there is not enough specificity under the current law, so it is pretty much useless.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;What everybody needs is a fresh look at the whole policy landscape for "mashosphere", as described in the WebMoney article I referenced above.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;TMBN has always been explicit that our goal is not only to be a traffic hub for members' sites but build community at (&lt;a href="http://www.healthvoices.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;www.healthvoices.com&lt;/a&gt;).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;So yes, we are more than a "dumb" aggregator. We are building a feature-rich intelligent community site.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dmitriy Kruglyak</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 16 Mar 2006 20:48:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Medical Blog Network vs. Lynch Mob</title><link>http://healthcareguy.disqus.com/medical_blog_network_vs_lynch_mob/#comment-22242444</link><description>I find it ironic that the legal precedent to vindicate my original position arrives just in time:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://news.com.com/Google+wins+a+court+battle/2100-1030_3-6050667.html?tag=nefd.top" rel="nofollow"&gt;Google wins a court battle&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dmitriy Kruglyak</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 16 Mar 2006 20:39:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Medical Blog Network vs. Lynch Mob</title><link>http://healthcareguy.disqus.com/medical_blog_network_vs_lynch_mob/#comment-22242439</link><description>To respond to Carsten's points on comments and permalinks:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;1) Quoting for the purpose of commenting is a well-established example of fair use of copyrighted materials.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;2) We include both links to every item on our site (Permalinks) and the links back to original post (Sourcelinks). Both are listed clearly.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;3) Every post is clearly attributed with the name of the original author. We are not mis-representing authorship to anyone who can read.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;These points become moot for bloggers who publish only teasers in RSS feeds - which generate traffic to their sites. You have full control over your feeds.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Get ready for the wave of innovation that will be hard to grasp at first:&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.webmonkey.com/06/10/index1a.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.webmonkey.com/06/10/index1a.html&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dmitriy Kruglyak</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 16 Mar 2006 00:30:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Medical Blog Network vs. Lynch Mob</title><link>http://healthcareguy.disqus.com/medical_blog_network_vs_lynch_mob/#comment-22242438</link><description>I am happy to close this issue, as long as in the end I am not being accused of being a thief, plagiarist, criminal, guilty of misdeeds, cause of world hunger, etc. etc. etc. This is unfair.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;We should all still agree that it would not hurt to post clearer feed usage guidelines. And this is not the first time unanticipated use of technology (not just by TMBN) has brought and will bring a valid policy debate. Oh and by the way, our policy change was made before this controversy, but I was hoping to complete software update first.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I recommend that you all think carefully about how you publish feeds. TMBN is commited to operating publically and building an open community. But you might be surprised how easy it is for anonymous pirate to set up an operation that would not even respond to your inquiries.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thanks to all for being reasonable in the end.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dmitriy Kruglyak</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 15 Mar 2006 19:28:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Fingerprint payment has arrived &amp;#8212; continued</title><link>http://venturebeat.disqus.com/fingerprint_payment_has_arrived_8212_continued/#comment-14664706</link><description>I cannot help but marvel at what these guys have done. Raised a ton of money on vaporware and used it to buy companies with real businesses.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dmitriy Kruglyak</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2005 08:46:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Fingerprint payment has arrived &amp;#8212; continued</title><link>http://venturebeat.disqus.com/fingerprint_payment_has_arrived_8212_continued/#comment-14664708</link><description>Exactly. The best thing is once a fingerprint is stolen it cannot be replaced! DoD calls it "logical amputation". Enjoy!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dmitriy Kruglyak</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2005 13:12:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Louie, fresh from CIA, joins with Alsop in new fund</title><link>http://venturebeat.disqus.com/louie_fresh_from_cia_joins_with_alsop_in_new_fund/#comment-14664858</link><description>Matt,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I think you should profile Bessemer's Anti-Portfolio. It is a really refreshing bit of honesty and humor. Every VC should post one to earn credibility :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.bvp.com/port/anti.asp" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.bvp.com/port/anti.asp&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dmitriy Kruglyak</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2006 19:23:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: High flier Metreo hits wall?</title><link>http://venturebeat.disqus.com/high_flier_metreo_hits_wall/#comment-14664998</link><description>As someone familiar with the company from its early days, I am not surprised. Hype was way ahead of reality over there...</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dmitriy Kruglyak</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2006 07:41:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Doing deals in Om&amp;#8217;s loo</title><link>http://venturebeat.disqus.com/doing_deals_in_om8217s_loo/#comment-14665016</link><description>Too much sensationalism. Scott did not DO THE DEAL in the bathroom, he just got a phone call.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dmitriy Kruglyak</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2006 10:17:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Finally, a healthcare search engine that works</title><link>http://venturebeat.disqus.com/finally_a_healthcare_search_engine_that_works/#comment-14665037</link><description>The problem with HealthLine, WebMD, Google and their ilk is that they simply serve up what amounts to a "medical encyclopedia".&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;That's good and accurate, but not really helpful to regular people, who need more live, interactive and down-to-earth explainations of their health choices.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Watch us deliver just that (&lt;a href="http://www.healthvoices.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;www.healthvoices.com&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Dmitriy Kruglyak</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dmitriy Kruglyak</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2006 09:26:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: If this is true about Westly, public should be outraged</title><link>http://venturebeat.disqus.com/if_this_is_true_about_westly_public_should_be_outraged/#comment-14665725</link><description>Hmmm... A recent SiliconBeat post said that Silicon Valley needs to get better at lobbying.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;A little suggestion. To do better job in public advocacy arena we should refrain from tearing down our own candidates for no good reason. There is no evidence of wrongdoing whatsoever, only hearsay and hypotheticals.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Angelides is desperate to find anything to sling at Westly, doing a very poor job of it and has to settle for these little tidbits. After years as real estate developer and party boss he better look in the mirror.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Westly deserves our support, as the candidate best suited to stimulate the Innovation Economy.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dmitriy Kruglyak</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 10 Apr 2006 17:25:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: If this is true about Westly, public should be outraged</title><link>http://venturebeat.disqus.com/if_this_is_true_about_westly_public_should_be_outraged/#comment-14665726</link><description>Here is the story about Angelides we should be focusing on. Offloading his interest in a bank that was handing out money to his real estate friends and then went poof:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;"In a 1993 interview with the San Jose Business Journal, two bank officials attributed losses of more than $1.6 million in 1991 and '92 to what the article described as "unwieldy lending practices, much of which was tied to real estate."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.sacbee.com/content/politics/story/14241054p-15060652c.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.sacbee.com/content/politics/story/14241054p-15060652c.html&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dmitriy Kruglyak</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 10 Apr 2006 19:01:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Webaroo unveiled &amp;#8212; lets you carry cached Internet on your PC/smartphone</title><link>http://venturebeat.disqus.com/webaroo_unveiled_8212_lets_you_carry_cached_internet_on_your_pcsmartphone/#comment-14665732</link><description>This exposes the real story behind so many "stealth" companies, founded by has-beens:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;"We have nothing to show and no proof that our ideas will work. So we will pretend we know something you do not. We will act smug about it and try to impress you with past [irrelevant] accomplishments"&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;No wonder why bubbles happen.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dmitriy Kruglyak</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 10 Apr 2006 20:13:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Webaroo unveiled &amp;#8212; lets you carry cached Internet on your PC/smartphone</title><link>http://venturebeat.disqus.com/webaroo_unveiled_8212_lets_you_carry_cached_internet_on_your_pcsmartphone/#comment-14665735</link><description>Hold off calling these guys lucky, Yuri.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If your plan is stupid, raising VC money would not help you with a successful exit. Only would raise the hurdle for taking home any money at all.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Would love to see what the reputations of these guys would be once they are done with Webaroo.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Remember AllAdvantage.com? Pets.com? WebVan? Deals like that come back to bite you.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dmitriy Kruglyak</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 11 Apr 2006 14:51:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Web 2.0 List &amp;#8212; and news about Healthia, YackPack and Grouper&amp;#8217;s good fight</title><link>http://venturebeat.disqus.com/the_web_20_list_8212_and_news_about_healthia_yackpack_and_grouper8217s_good_fight/#comment-14665797</link><description>Too bad for Healthia that they do not have anyone with real healthcare experience onboard.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Lack of traffic shows that the dogs are not eating the dog food.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dmitriy Kruglyak</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 20 Apr 2006 14:53:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Sequoia Capital to Yale: &amp;#8220;Invest or else&amp;#8221;</title><link>http://venturebeat.disqus.com/sequoia_capital_to_yale_8220invest_or_else8221/#comment-14677987</link><description>My money is on Sequoia... Yale or not Yale, they are known as A-holes who deliver. They have the upper hand with LPs.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dmitriy Kruglyak</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2007 17:25:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: PurpleYogi, the 1999 personalization company, finally hits pay dirt</title><link>http://venturebeat.disqus.com/purpleyogi_the_1999_personalization_company_finally_hits_pay_dirt/#comment-14680276</link><description>"At one point, the company had to reset its value to zero"&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;How can you call this a success for the initial founders? Did they get wiped out completely? This is more than anything a cautionary tale than a success.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dmitriy Kruglyak</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2007 13:39:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: PurpleYogi, the 1999 personalization company, finally hits pay dirt</title><link>http://venturebeat.disqus.com/purpleyogi_the_1999_personalization_company_finally_hits_pay_dirt/#comment-14680278</link><description>This silence speaks for itself.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If anything this is a story about taking a flagging company, flushing the founders and using the assets with new money to create something entirely different.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dmitriy Kruglyak</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2007 18:51:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: OpenSocial is half-baked and Google execs don’t seem to care</title><link>http://venturebeat.disqus.com/opensocial_is_half_baked_and_google_execs_dont_seem_to_care/#comment-14680727</link><description>Lee is biased but this does not mean he is wrong. OpenSocial is half-baked because myriad of details FB developers take for granted are up in the air. In many cases these design decisions will be made in proprietary extensions and containter TOSes.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;This does not mean Google / MySpace will not get it right, but it is a long hard road.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dmitriy Kruglyak</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2007 01:25:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Foreign investors leave Russia after bizarre interview &amp;#8212; may return</title><link>http://venturebeat.disqus.com/foreign_investors_leave_russia_after_bizarre_interview_8212_may_return/#comment-14681015</link><description>I think polonium is the recent tool of choice.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dmitriy Kruglyak</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2007 13:32:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: GMail updates: A sneaky, creepy new year from Google?</title><link>http://venturebeat.disqus.com/gmail_updates_a_sneaky_creepy_new_year_from_google/#comment-14681440</link><description>Yet another example of Google caring more about beating a competitor than delivering something useful to real people.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;One more thing they better do - global opt-out of having ANY of my data on their servers.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dmitriy Kruglyak</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 2007 12:51:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: iMedix combines health search and community &amp;#8212; but does neither well</title><link>http://venturebeat.disqus.com/imedix_combines_health_search_and_community_8212_but_does_neither_well/#comment-14682118</link><description>If there is any consumer Internet segment that reminds of dot-com bubble it is "Health 2.0". Business model eludes these new sites. Few if any can even get any significant number of users. Only a handful are founded by people with any healthcare experience whatsoever.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Most of these companies are quite transparent that they only care about profiting from health. Yet they fail to do even that.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dmitriy Kruglyak</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 19 Jan 2008 22:40:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Social Apps Should Get You Laid</title><link>http://socialtimes.disqus.com/social_apps_should_get_you_laid/#comment-1574790</link><description>Nick,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I think Facebook's entertainment slant comes from its origins and is self-reinforcing. Take a look at the chapter I submitted for the upcoming "Psychology of Facebook" book. IMHO, it addresses the questions you ask.&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://docs.google.com/Doc?id=dctjh9vw_1hs29mrgb" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://docs.google.com/Doc?id=dctjh9vw_1hs29mrgb&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Plus, here is the site for the book, that is coming out of the sequel to the famous Stanford Facebook class:&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.psychologyoffacebook.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.psychologyoffacebook.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Would love to hear you thoughts on the role of context.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dmitriy Kruglyak</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2008 20:31:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 2007/04/19/petition-against-alexas-statsaholic-lawsuit/</title><link>http://mashable.disqus.com/thread_8880/#comment-5928394</link><description>Amazon, hands off Statsaholic!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dmitriy Kruglyak</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 22 Apr 2007 03:50:18 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>