<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for CZ</title><link>http://disqus.com/people/4affc8ac5c79489b459072db20656e2f/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2007 14:02:03 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: FCC Fixes Video Franchising</title><link>http://tlf.disqus.com/fcc_fixes_video_franchising/#comment-1449076</link><description>We link and quote from this post over at Verizon's policy blog:&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://poliblog.verizon.com/poliblog/blogs/poliblog/davidfish9/181/fcc-delivers-quot-victory-for-consumers-quot-.aspx" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://poliblog.verizon.com/poliblog/blogs/poli...&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">CZ</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 22 Dec 2006 08:20:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Harper on &amp;#8220;Network Neutering&amp;#8221;</title><link>http://tlf.disqus.com/harper_on_8220network_neutering8221/#comment-1449427</link><description>Tim,  I will be checking out this book very soon for myself.  In the mean time, thought you and your readers might want to see what we've posted over at Verizon's policy blog.  Not about at&amp;t; but on IP pioneers and thought leaders weighing in on NN. CZ&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://poliblog.verizon.com/PoliBlog/Blogs/PoliBlog/LinkHoewing9/203/Voices-Mount-Against-Net-Neutrality-Regulation.aspx" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://poliblog.verizon.com/PoliBlog/Blogs/Poli...&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">CZ</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2007 14:20:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Chewed it up and spat it out</title><link>http://bennettblog.disqus.com/chewed_it_up_and_spat_it_out/#comment-2134873</link><description>Richard, though you and your readers might want to see what we've posted over at Verizon's policy blog.  Not about at&amp;amp;t but on IP pioneers and thought leaders weighing in on NN. CZ&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://poliblog.verizon.com/PoliBlog/Blogs/PoliBlog/LinkHoewing9/203/Voices-Mount-Against-Net-Neutrality-Regulation.aspx" rel="nofollow"&gt;Link&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">CZ</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2007 15:14:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Accel getting serious?</title><link>http://bennettblog.disqus.com/accel_getting_serious/#comment-2134891</link><description>Richard, Don't miss Esther Dyson's comments -- and Link's take -- on Net Neutrality over at Verizon's Policy Blog.  (Thx for the blog roll honor!)  CZ&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://poliblog.verizon.com/poliblog/blogs/poliblog/linkhoewing9/222/dyson-adds-perspective-on-net-regulation.aspx" rel="nofollow"&gt;Link&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">CZ</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 07 Feb 2007 11:47:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google&amp;#8217;s censorship abuses</title><link>http://bennettblog.disqus.com/google8217s_censorship_abuses/#comment-2134908</link><description>Richard, I was thinking the same when I first read about Gisburn's run-in.  As usual, you were a bit quicker.  In a post today I cite you and others and I hope advances this some more (and also give you credit for a phase that should be coined).  CZ&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://poliblog.verizon.com/poliblog/blogs/poliblog/czblogger1/233/free-speech-and-the-net-regulation-distraction-.aspx" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://poliblog.verizon.com/poliblog/blogs/poli...&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">CZ</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 12 Feb 2007 13:56:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Net Neutrality in summary</title><link>http://bennettblog.disqus.com/net_neutrality_in_summary/#comment-2134941</link><description>Richard, perfect as usual!  I echoed and linked &lt;a href="http://policyblog.verizon.com/policyblog/blogs/policyblog/czblogger1/255/seeing-the-truth-through-the-net-neutrality-fog.aspx" rel="nofollow"&gt;over at Verizon's PolicyBlog&lt;/a&gt;!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Also, we're seeking some good questions for our GPON engineer/guru for a Q&amp;amp;A at the blog  -- &lt;a href="http://policyblog.verizon.com/policyblog/blogs/policyblog/czblogger1/253/virtual-discussion-w-broadband-expert-qs-wanted-.aspx" rel="nofollow"&gt;more details here&lt;/a&gt;.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">CZ</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2007 13:40:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Until they&amp;#8217;re old enough to drive</title><link>http://bennettblog.disqus.com/until_they8217re_old_enough_to_drive/#comment-2134942</link><description>Richard, while a bunch of wisecracks come to mind, my code of conduct encourages a golden rule :-)  Good for them for using their legs instead of mid-east oil. However, I'll shamelessly promote a link to a interview that anyone wanting to know what VZ's fiber optic broadband means (hint: 400mbs, unlimited VOD..). check in on the first halk of this &lt;a href="http://policyblog.verizon.com/policyblog/blogs/policyblog/czblogger1/258/broadband-fios-conversation-with-brian-whitton.aspx" rel="nofollow"&gt;interview with a FiOS engineer&lt;/a&gt;.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">CZ</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2007 14:02:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why can&amp;#8217;t CEO&amp;#8217;s use Web sites/blogs to disclose things?</title><link>http://scobleizer.disqus.com/why_can8217t_ceo8217s_use_web_sitesblogs_to_disclose_things/#comment-9655381</link><description>Robert,&lt;br&gt;While not Ivan's specifically, Verizon today launched its first blog -- a place to discuss technology and telecom policy.  As content builds, check in on us from time to time:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://poliblog.verizon.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://poliblog.verizon.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Bon make a good point, BTW.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">CZ</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 03 Oct 2006 12:41:41 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>