<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for That's what she said Inc.</title><link>http://disqus.com/people/49bbcca09a3dd9f89a50907d6be3e8c4/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 14:55:47 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Project Dark Day 2, Love it, Hate it, or Meh?!</title><link>http://tmonews.disqus.com/project_dark_day_2_love_it_hate_it_or_meh/#comment-22681772</link><description>Yes, tmobile made WAY too much drama about this this. Giving it a project name..lol.. is ridiculous!  And the NDA??  Who cares if employees talked about it??? &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;No other company is gunna copy it!!!???? It's all confusing and no cheaper than Sprint if you stay on the subsidized phone plan.  And most people have to get new cheap phones if they want 3G.   Tmo doesn't even offer a 3G BB handset yet...so you got to buy one if you want to actually make use of that data plan.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">That's what she said Inc.</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 14:55:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How To Explore Internet Memes</title><link>http://sbspalding.disqus.com/how_to_explore_internet_memes/#comment-1883781</link><description>Chuck Norris, former student at Castle Heights Military Academy in Lebanon, Tennessee.  True!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">That's what she said Inc.</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2007 16:57:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Our view: New policy on details off to troubling start</title><link>http://salemnews.disqus.com/our_view_new_policy_on_details_off_to_troubling_start/#comment-2948855</link><description>any one who bothers these flagmen shoud be put in jail .cops are so greedy.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">That's what she said Inc.</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 19:41:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Police search homeless shelter for drugs</title><link>http://salemnews.disqus.com/police_search_homeless_shelter_for_drugs/#comment-8004123</link><description>Get rid of this shelter- move it to an area that is not so close to downtown.  I'm sick of the beggars and drunks that frequently plague my neighborhood- if you can ask me for $, then you can work.  It doesn't take a degree to mow a lawn, pour coffee or ask if you want fries with that.  This does nothing for the city but bring it down.  If anyone thinks this is a sober shelter too- think again.  All one has to do is take a walk to the parks and cemeteries near this eye sore to see how sober it really is.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">That's what she said Inc.</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 09:50:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Police search homeless shelter for drugs</title><link>http://salemnews.disqus.com/police_search_homeless_shelter_for_drugs/#comment-8015464</link><description>Yes, there is anger because it's excuse after excuse.  If it's not one thing, it’s another.  There is viable treatment that can be had if the right steps are taken, but 9.999 times out of 10- it's the easy road that's traveled- because the other is just too hard.  Cry me a river.  The difficult thing is to be responsible and do whatever it takes to change a bad situation.  If that road was taken more often then not, there would be no need for a homeless shelter, no need to beg and no need for random drug searches.  Instead, we have people who want to enable.    &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;You want me to help?  Sure thing- I'll pack every box necessary to get that place out of Salem.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">That's what she said Inc.</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 15:42:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Police search homeless shelter for drugs</title><link>http://salemnews.disqus.com/police_search_homeless_shelter_for_drugs/#comment-8018352</link><description>You're wrong.  I do get addiction and chemical imbalances of the brain.  I used to smoke and still want to after being free of nicotine for over 6 years but, I make a COGNITIVE CHOICE NOT TO.  I will not and refuse to make an excuse to light up.  As I said, that would be the easy way out.  The difficult part is to say no. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Keep enabling and making excuses and there will always be a steady stream of people going through the Salem Mission.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">That's what she said Inc.</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 17:20:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Carhole.net</title><link>http://carhole.disqus.com/carholenet_1878/#comment-692894</link><description>That's what she said.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">That's what she said Inc.</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2008 14:18:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Tesla tours 'Forever More' &gt;&gt; Tour dates and concert ticket info  &gt;&gt; LiveDaily</title><link>http://livedaily.disqus.com/tesla_tours_forever_more_tour_dates_and_concert_ticket_info_livedaily/#comment-3022434</link><description>ATLANTA ! Please !</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">That's what she said Inc.</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 10:48:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Are Your Kids Reading Nick News? | Democrat=Socialist</title><link>http://dequalss.disqus.com/are_your_kids_reading_nick_news_democratsocialist/#comment-2962434</link><description>The orangutan is an ape not a monkey.&lt;br&gt;12 ribs, just like me and you.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">That's what she said Inc.</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2008 10:05:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 7 Hot Penny Stocks You Degenerate Gamblers Need To Know About</title><link>http://timsykes.disqus.com/7_hot_penny_stocks_you_degenerate_gamblers_need_to_know_about/#comment-13049753</link><description>Timmy always talks about keeping losses small,  but look at your track record.  Your losses are bigger than your gains,  at that rate, you will be down to zero in no time.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Your days are over</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">That's what she said Inc.</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2009 03:40:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How My Blog Income Was $43,683 In January While My Trading Gains Amounted To $6, Yes $6</title><link>http://timsykes.disqus.com/how_my_blog_income_was_43683_in_january_while_my_trading_gains_amounted_to_6_yes_6/#comment-13052072</link><description>How about posting up how many subscribers demand refunds</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">That's what she said Inc.</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 12:40:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: If I agree to be my Relative&amp;#8217;s Guardian, what have I agreed to do?</title><link>http://houstonlawyersdirect.disqus.com/if_i_agree_to_be_my_relative8217s_guardian_what_have_i_agreed_to_do/#comment-3620165</link><description>Great post, thanks; I'll add this to my feed!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">That's what she said Inc.</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 01 Nov 2008 00:20:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Vlog: Nokia Sports Tracker Bike Cradle</title><link>http://thenokiablog.disqus.com/vlog_nokia_sports_tracker_bike_cradle/#comment-7438014</link><description>@Pablo, can you tell us more about your cradle? Where did you get it?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">That's what she said Inc.</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 19:18:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How Nokia Users Follow Twitter on Their Phones</title><link>http://thenokiablog.disqus.com/how_nokia_users_follow_twitter_on_their_phones/#comment-7438681</link><description>@Bas Heetebrij, Dabr is like an updated version of Slandr. Try it!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">That's what she said Inc.</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 03:17:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Goldman Sachs Responds To Dark Pool Impropriety Allegations</title><link>http://zerohedge.disqus.com/goldman_sachs_responds_to_dark_pool_impropriety_allegations/#comment-11041925</link><description>what?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">That's what she said Inc.</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 10:00:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How to Deal with People who are Stealing your Content</title><link>http://johncowdotcom.disqus.com/how_to_deal_with_people_who_are_stealing_your_content/#comment-9395727</link><description>Forget that list. Just file a DMCA notification immediately with the ISP (Google isn't necessary). Problem solved. If the ISP is non-U.S., they still usually will get rid of the content because it violates their TOS.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Just make sure you own your content, i.e., you are the copyright owner. If you commission content from freelancers, they own it, not you, even if you've paid them (you just have an implicit license to use it). You cannot file the DMCA notification unless you own it or have a limited power of attorney or agency appointment for copyright matters from the owner. The easiest thing is to just own it. So always have a written contract transferring copyright in exchange for valuable consideration (the payment).</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">That's what she said Inc.</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 08:30:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: California Teachers Association Opposes Budget Cuts</title><link>http://thepolicyreport.disqus.com/california_teachers_association_opposes_budget_cuts/#comment-8469750</link><description>The California Teachers Association should have their budget reduced.  After all, they threw away $1 Million to oppose the upcoming vote on Prop 8.  $1 Million Dollars!!  Their budgets are SUPPOSED to be used for educational purposes.   That's why they are arguing for more money from taxpayers now.  But to take money from taxpayers earmarked for education, make political contributions with the proceeds, then argue for more money for education, is well...is it even legal?  Sounds really wrong.  They are simply not exhibiting proper stewardship.  Cut their budgets!!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">That's what she said Inc.</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 20:51:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Blog: President Obama: Still Behind Employee Free Choice | Wal-Mart Watch | Fighting for Wal-Mart Workers | Employee Free Choice Act</title><link>http://walmartwatchblog.disqus.com/blog_president_obama_still_behind_employee_free_choice_wal_mart_watch_fighting_for_wal_mart_workers_/#comment-9380109</link><description>Wow, talk about living in la la land!  So where did realist say "still contend that the EFCA is more anti-labor than the way that they are written at the present time"  Let me take a shot at the crap you posted and say.... NEVER NEVER NEVER did Realist say that.  Stop making up stories to support your cause.  It's old, it's disengenous but most importantly IT'S A LIE!!!!  So let me state.... &lt;b&gt;YOU ARE THE LIAR!!!!!&amp;lt;ib&amp;gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Creating a new law that is just as bad, if not worse, then the current policies is not even close to a solution that defends the employer and employee.  EFCA is nothing but a shill law to accomodate unions while at the same times takes away rights for workers.  You may claim that it doesn't eliminate secret ballot elections but you know damn well that is the intention and and what the reality will be.  To believe otherwise is either nieve, stupid or downright sinister in belief.  In your case Big D I'll go for the sinister alibi because you couldn't give a rat's a$$ about the employee as long as your beloved union controls all.  Your statements are nothing more than a wortheless piece of crap.&lt;/b&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">That's what she said Inc.</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 21:32:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Blog: President Obama: Still Behind Employee Free Choice | Wal-Mart Watch | Fighting for Wal-Mart Workers | Employee Free Choice Act</title><link>http://walmartwatchblog.disqus.com/blog_president_obama_still_behind_employee_free_choice_wal_mart_watch_fighting_for_wal_mart_workers_/#comment-9462971</link><description>I like Realist's question Big D.  Should workers have a right to have a secret ballot, yes or no?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;btw, you can quit with the stories again.  Where did I say "if the current secret ballot system is soooooo great for the labor in this country as you would have people believe"&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;How about this one.  If you are so pro-labor then why would you deny you fellow laborers the opportunity to have a secret ballot vote in their wishes for/against a union?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">That's what she said Inc.</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 16 May 2009 23:18:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Blog: President Obama: Still Behind Employee Free Choice | Wal-Mart Watch | Fighting for Wal-Mart Workers | Employee Free Choice Act</title><link>http://walmartwatchblog.disqus.com/blog_president_obama_still_behind_employee_free_choice_wal_mart_watch_fighting_for_wal_mart_workers_/#comment-9466149</link><description>&lt;i&gt;Of course they should! Under the EFCA they do and also I should mention that it is the employees that determine weather or not there will be a secret ballot or not. &lt;/i&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Then if you believe in letting the employees determine weather or not there will be a secret ballot or not then why would you disenfranchise 50%-1 of the employee base from ever having a vote?  Can you honestly say that EVERY employee will have a voice?  At least in today's system EVERY employee has a say.  Under EFCA 50%-1 of the employee base can and will effectively lose that ability.  So why are you so anti-labor that you can't let employees make the decisions for themselves without the bullying tactics of the union?  What makes you hate employees that much that you want to rob them of their ability to have their own say?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">That's what she said Inc.</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 17 May 2009 01:10:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Blog: President Obama: Still Behind Employee Free Choice | Wal-Mart Watch | Fighting for Wal-Mart Workers | Employee Free Choice Act</title><link>http://walmartwatchblog.disqus.com/blog_president_obama_still_behind_employee_free_choice_wal_mart_watch_fighting_for_wal_mart_workers_/#comment-9477493</link><description>&lt;i&gt;Name me one company, that would keep people on long term, even if they are not needed, just to treat them humanly? &lt;/i&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I can answer that question but it's not a company but the government on both federal and local levels.  Working for the government is the safest place to be during recession because it's incredibly difficult to get fired with the union road blocks in the way.  Take a look at the teachers union who defends incompetent teachers to protect their own.  I have worked in the private sector all of my life but in several of those jobs it meant working for a company on a government contract.  The last being working for Lockeed at the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid.  Talk about a DEAD zone.  The mass majority of the government employees I came across and worked with during my tenure would never had made in the in private sector at their positions.  They are government "lifers" and were quite happy with their lazy status.  Hey, it was a paycheck.  And we won't even start with the teachers unions and their protection of incompetent teachers within their ranks.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">That's what she said Inc.</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 17 May 2009 14:51:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Blog: President Obama: Still Behind Employee Free Choice | Wal-Mart Watch | Fighting for Wal-Mart Workers | Employee Free Choice Act</title><link>http://walmartwatchblog.disqus.com/blog_president_obama_still_behind_employee_free_choice_wal_mart_watch_fighting_for_wal_mart_workers_/#comment-9480033</link><description>Big D... do you believe that EVERY employee who signs a card that it is signed of their own free will without intimidation from union members and fellow co-workers?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Here's a better one for Big D since he can't quite seem to grasp the "free will" concepts here.  If card check is such a good option for employees then why is everyone not racing to implement it in general office elections and just get rid of secret ballot voting as the norm in our society?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Or try this one.  Go out to the unions and say everything about EFCA is perfect BUT the final vote for a union MUST be done via secret ballot, even if you have 50%+1 of card check signage and see what they say.  Let me take a guess.... don't let the door hit you on the way out of their offices!  EFCA is a sham law that benefits UNIONS and ONLY UNIONS.  Who do you think wrote it and is backing it with millions of dollars for gods sake!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">That's what she said Inc.</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 17 May 2009 17:41:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Blog: Friday Speak Out Round Up: Unexcused absences and undemocratic practices | Wal-Mart Watch | Fighting for Wal-Mart Workers | Employee Free Choice Act</title><link>http://walmartwatchblog.disqus.com/blog_friday_speak_out_round_up_unexcused_absences_and_undemocratic_practices_wal_mart_watch_fighting/#comment-9540544</link><description>Wow, this is hilarious and a perfect example of hyprocracy of Unions.  Try and give them "keys to the kingdom" and let them control their own fate and they are too afraid to take it.  God forbid you actually try and RUN a company vs. trying to RUN IT INTO THE GROUND.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Like I've read in the past, if the unions think they can run a business better then current management at companies like Walmart THEN JUST DO IT!  Take the MILLIONS of dollars taken from its members and stop putting them into political donations and instead open up a competitor store to Walmart and "show them how it should be done".  Let me take a guess... it will NEVER happen.  Union management NEVER wants to be in a position where can get get blamed for the failures.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Just LMAO!!!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://money.cnn.com/2009/05/19/news/companies/uaw_ownership/index.htm?postversion=2009051911" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://money.cnn.com/2009/05/19/news/companies/...&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">That's what she said Inc.</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 12:03:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Blog: Friday Speak Out Round Up: Unexcused absences and undemocratic practices | Wal-Mart Watch | Fighting for Wal-Mart Workers | Employee Free Choice Act</title><link>http://walmartwatchblog.disqus.com/blog_friday_speak_out_round_up_unexcused_absences_and_undemocratic_practices_wal_mart_watch_fighting/#comment-9549949</link><description>&lt;/i&gt;You are the oldest "all about ME" person I've ever met. Usually reality kicks in and they outgrow it.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Actually I think Big D and Sparky are the biggest "all about me" people on this site.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">That's what she said Inc.</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 16:47:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Blog: Friday Speak Out Round Up: Unexcused absences and undemocratic practices | Wal-Mart Watch | Fighting for Wal-Mart Workers | Employee Free Choice Act</title><link>http://walmartwatchblog.disqus.com/blog_friday_speak_out_round_up_unexcused_absences_and_undemocratic_practices_wal_mart_watch_fighting/#comment-9563498</link><description>NO that is where you are wrong  Big D.  Unions ARE all about the "me".  It's what's best for the unions reguardless of what is best for the company or their customers. So say it slowly now and it may sink in.  ME ME ME ME ME ME.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Did you see today where the unions are to too chicken-$h1T to take on any ownership or responsibility with Chrysler?  It's awefully hard to take a leaderhip and moral high ground when you can't even put a stake in the ground.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">That's what she said Inc.</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 23:44:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Blog: Friday Speak Out Round Up: Unexcused absences and undemocratic practices | Wal-Mart Watch | Fighting for Wal-Mart Workers | Employee Free Choice Act</title><link>http://walmartwatchblog.disqus.com/blog_friday_speak_out_round_up_unexcused_absences_and_undemocratic_practices_wal_mart_watch_fighting/#comment-9608454</link><description>As far as the UAW getting ownership of Chrysler, that doesn't happen until AFTER they come out of bankruptcy. And if they happen to sell their shares BEFORE then to fund thier health and pension funds, I would consider that to be taking care of their members best interests.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;So Sparky what will your reaction be WHEN Chrysler does come out of banktruptcy because we all know darn well that Obama will not let Chrylser fail because he has been bought and paid for by the unions?  AND if the unions are so good at telling management "how" the company should be run they should be relishing the idea of having a seat at the table of control, so why would they not want to take the bull by the horns and "show the world" how things SHOULD be done for the betterment of companies, employees and unions.  They would be "taking care of their members best interests" 10 times over with a stake in the game.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I'll repeat what I said earlier... Too CHICKEN to take the reigns and possibly get blamed for disastrous decisions.  That fully explains unions and their MO.  Oh how I would LOVE to see them take on a business venture of their own to show the world how good they are, but sadly it will never ever happen.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">That's what she said Inc.</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 21:11:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Blog: What Will Happen Tonight In Orange County? | Wal-Mart Watch | Fighting for Wal-Mart Workers | Employee Free Choice Act</title><link>http://walmartwatchblog.disqus.com/blog_what_will_happen_tonight_in_orange_county_wal_mart_watch_fighting_for_wal_mart_workers_employee/#comment-9788703</link><description>And &lt;i&gt;ken desecration&lt;/i&gt; yields 56,000 hits so what is your point?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">That's what she said Inc.</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 08:16:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Blog: Wal-Mart Agrees To Settlement In The Desert | Wal-Mart Watch | Fighting for Wal-Mart Workers | Employee Free Choice Act</title><link>http://walmartwatchblog.disqus.com/blog_wal_mart_agrees_to_settlement_in_the_desert_wal_mart_watch_fighting_for_wal_mart_workers_employ/#comment-9788843</link><description>&lt;i&gt;But how many people ACTUALLY do that?&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I do!  That's what it means to be a good shopper.  I also know that Walmart isn't the cheapest in price for all of my things that I purchase.  But I comparison shop as well as shop the local store sales including Safeway.  What I can't begin to tell you is how many times Safeway has tried to screw me over by charging me more than the advertised price, especially on the loss-leader items.  I've had to go to the customer service counter numerous times and show them the errors.  They in turn give me cash back for the error difference yet still don't change it for future purchases.  That's the part that is unconscionable.   I have NEVER seen an incorrect pricing IN MY FAVOR at Safeway.  So are they as bad as Walmart?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">That's what she said Inc.</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 08:23:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Blog: Rob Walton&amp;#8217;s New Ride | Wal-Mart Watch | Fighting for Wal-Mart Workers | Employee Free Choice Act</title><link>http://walmartwatchblog.disqus.com/blog_rob_walton8217s_new_ride_wal_mart_watch_fighting_for_wal_mart_workers_employee_free_choice_act/#comment-10053745</link><description>Wow so SanDiegoView, Big D and Sparky have ALL decided not make a post on this site in "solidarity" to protest a censored post.  And obviously someone is not telling the truth (SDV... "no.. threats", WMW... "which referred to running over another commenter with a car") That's unless of course you don't regard "running over another commenter with a car" as a "threat".  It's going to get very quiet around here with Ken V holding the lone descenting voice.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Yea right, and pigs will start flying!.... &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;mark my words.   It will only be a matter of time before all 3 come back.  They won't hold to "their words" and there is NO solidarity.  I give it 3 days at most before we hear from anyone of them again.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">That's what she said Inc.</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 10:43:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Blog: Students In Lodi, CA, Use Wal-Mart As Fodder For Debate | Wal-Mart Watch | Fighting for Wal-Mart Workers | Employee Free Choice Act</title><link>http://walmartwatchblog.disqus.com/blog_students_in_lodi_ca_use_wal_mart_as_fodder_for_debate_wal_mart_watch_fighting_for_wal_mart_work/#comment-10054077</link><description>"20% of the population as a whole"&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Oh my how we exaggerate our numbers.  So let me get this straight.  The 45% of the population who DID NOT vote for BO are now down to 20% since November AND BO has lost 0 supporters in the same time period?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;OK, Go ahead and rest on your laurels.  Boy will it be a rude awakening as the masses continue to build against BO and his socialist policies.  It's only a matter of time.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">That's what she said Inc.</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 10:54:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Blog: Students In Lodi, CA, Use Wal-Mart As Fodder For Debate | Wal-Mart Watch | Fighting for Wal-Mart Workers | Employee Free Choice Act</title><link>http://walmartwatchblog.disqus.com/blog_students_in_lodi_ca_use_wal_mart_as_fodder_for_debate_wal_mart_watch_fighting_for_wal_mart_work/#comment-10097854</link><description>It's up to the GOP to get its house in order when in reality it should not be that hard.  It's all about principles and in the past 2 election cycles it's about the principles the GOP has LOST.  It turned from a party of 1) smaller goverment, 2) lower taxes and 3) personal freedom to... well.. a Democratic party of bigger government, more control and more spending.  Everyone talks about how the GOP needs to cater to more moderates but what has killed them is their loss of the conservatives who follow those 3 basic principles.  It wasn't the Democrats who won, it was the Republicans who lost.  BIG difference.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;What's even more crazy is the Democrat side that complained endlessly about GWB and his spending and control issues but at the same time think it's perfectly fine for BO to follow the same path... ONLY 3 TIMES LARGER AND FASTER!  This is nuts.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">That's what she said Inc.</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 13:21:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Blog: Students In Lodi, CA, Use Wal-Mart As Fodder For Debate | Wal-Mart Watch | Fighting for Wal-Mart Workers | Employee Free Choice Act</title><link>http://walmartwatchblog.disqus.com/blog_students_in_lodi_ca_use_wal_mart_as_fodder_for_debate_wal_mart_watch_fighting_for_wal_mart_work/#comment-10149876</link><description>"The vast majority of the American people have had their fill of the likes of Karl Rove, Rush Limbaugh, or Newt Gingrich."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Wow that's an awefully big assumption that I, like so many other conservatives, pray to the gods of Rove, Limbaugh and Gingrich.  For that matter you should add Steele to that list.  BUT oh HOW WRONG YOU ARE.  The one thing I benefit from, which a liberal left will NEVER understand, is that I don't take what is thrown at me as gospel.  I actually take the time to fully understand the subject and I form MY OWN OPINIONS unlike the BO bots out there.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But hey why should you care if you think "20% may be a little high" even though we may be "very vocal".  We shouldn't matter to the liberal left.  Just keep saying that, but I will certainly relish it WHEN things turn so far south for this administration.  I knew it was going to be bad, just not this bad this fast.  btw, keep Nancy up there for now.  She's good fodder and will be great for the 2010 cycle.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">That's what she said Inc.</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 08:57:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Blog: Students In Lodi, CA, Use Wal-Mart As Fodder For Debate | Wal-Mart Watch | Fighting for Wal-Mart Workers | Employee Free Choice Act</title><link>http://walmartwatchblog.disqus.com/blog_students_in_lodi_ca_use_wal_mart_as_fodder_for_debate_wal_mart_watch_fighting_for_wal_mart_work/#comment-10239432</link><description>Hey Ken, since you seem to be so "astute" as to what conservatives and Republicans think and how they are related.... why don't you "share your wealth" of your knowledge as to what happened over the past 8 years and how that compares/contrasts to conservative and Republican views.  I will also be curious to see if Sandiegoview, Big D or Sparky break their solidarity "cone of silence" to interject.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;This should be good.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">That's what she said Inc.</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 20:38:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Blog: Students In Lodi, CA, Use Wal-Mart As Fodder For Debate | Wal-Mart Watch | Fighting for Wal-Mart Workers | Employee Free Choice Act</title><link>http://walmartwatchblog.disqus.com/blog_students_in_lodi_ca_use_wal_mart_as_fodder_for_debate_wal_mart_watch_fighting_for_wal_mart_work/#comment-10290679</link><description>&lt;i&gt;If you right wing ideologues represent about 20% of the population, you should have a similar marginal representation here at WMW &lt;/i&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Or just maybe your 20% is not an accurate number.  btw, the only ones I hear bring up the name Limbaugh are people on left who have tried in vein to label him the "head" of the GOP.  Yea right.  Didn't work then and won't work now.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">That's what she said Inc.</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2009 07:39:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Blog: Students In Lodi, CA, Use Wal-Mart As Fodder For Debate | Wal-Mart Watch | Fighting for Wal-Mart Workers | Employee Free Choice Act</title><link>http://walmartwatchblog.disqus.com/blog_students_in_lodi_ca_use_wal_mart_as_fodder_for_debate_wal_mart_watch_fighting_for_wal_mart_work/#comment-10308143</link><description>&lt;i&gt;I could go on with a Republican rogues gallery, but I'm interested in which piper you follow.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;You just don't get it Ken do you?  I don't follow ANYONE.  I'm a conservative in my principles and the GOP is not serving me right now.  The left Dems WILL NEVER serve me.  That I know for a fact.  Didn't you pay attention to and read the link you pointed me to?  So what's happening to Independents vs. the MSM Dems and Repubs?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The clock is ticking......</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">That's what she said Inc.</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2009 22:58:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Blog: Students In Lodi, CA, Use Wal-Mart As Fodder For Debate | Wal-Mart Watch | Fighting for Wal-Mart Workers | Employee Free Choice Act</title><link>http://walmartwatchblog.disqus.com/blog_students_in_lodi_ca_use_wal_mart_as_fodder_for_debate_wal_mart_watch_fighting_for_wal_mart_work/#comment-10318485</link><description>"Right Wing-nut scorched earth policy"&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And what "scorched earth policy" might that be Ken?  Do you mean the conservatives, independents and ever more vocal opponents in BO's Democratic party voicing their disent because it appears to be getting louder every day as BO and the Democrats spend this country into bankruptcy.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The only thing surprising his how fast BO and his party are accelerating the destruction.  Case in point... Government Motors starting tomorrow.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">That's what she said Inc.</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 31 May 2009 13:30:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Blog: Class Action Lawsuit Filed Over Sales Tax Issues | Wal-Mart Watch | Fighting for Wal-Mart Workers | Employee Free Choice Act</title><link>http://walmartwatchblog.disqus.com/blog_class_action_lawsuit_filed_over_sales_tax_issues_wal_mart_watch_fighting_for_wal_mart_workers_e/#comment-10395771</link><description>So did Walmart "keep" the difference or was it forwarded to the state of IL so they are the ones receiving the monitary gains?  Finish the story.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">That's what she said Inc.</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 15:30:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Blog: Class Action Lawsuit Filed Over Sales Tax Issues | Wal-Mart Watch | Fighting for Wal-Mart Workers | Employee Free Choice Act</title><link>http://walmartwatchblog.disqus.com/blog_class_action_lawsuit_filed_over_sales_tax_issues_wal_mart_watch_fighting_for_wal_mart_workers_e/#comment-10399020</link><description>A very simple comment for you Jane..... PROVE IT!  Don't start spouting off allegations without the facts to back it up.  It just so belittles your cause.  So show me the facts Jane.  Point me to something... ANYTHING that indicates that Walmart kept the money difference.  I could say the state is making out like a bandit and keeping money that does not belong to them, but I don't...... BECAUSE I DON'T HAVE ALL OF THE FACTS!  But to post a story with such a slant without all of the facts is as disingenous as you get get and simply poor reporting with a huge side of bias.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">That's what she said Inc.</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 16:47:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Blog: Class Action Lawsuit Filed Over Sales Tax Issues | Wal-Mart Watch | Fighting for Wal-Mart Workers | Employee Free Choice Act</title><link>http://walmartwatchblog.disqus.com/blog_class_action_lawsuit_filed_over_sales_tax_issues_wal_mart_watch_fighting_for_wal_mart_workers_e/#comment-10399803</link><description>Corey, keeping what difference?  Show me the proof in this case and I don't know what you read about the CT case but I looked at both of the links provided in this story about the CT case.  I absolutely do see an error in Walmart if they did not allow even exchanges without double-charging sales tax but the only one who benefited was the state of CT and their citizenship who gets screwed out of more money for the state.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If a consumer purchased something for $100 with a 5% sales tax and paid $105 and then returned the item, without a sales receipt, and was only offered $100 back (no returned sales tax) did it state that Walmart kept the $5?  If the consumer then repurchased the $100 (even though all they needed was an even exchange) and they ultimately paid $105 again the consumer is out $5 more than necessary.  Again where did the money go?  Did CT get it?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;btw, news for everyone here.  Go into ANY retail store and I challenge you to get a full REFUND of your purchase price + sales tax if you have no receipt.  At best you get store credit for the lowest price + sales tax.  If any stores treats you more fairly they are more than likely making up for it somewhere else in higher prices for that service.  A business is still in business with the goal of making money for it's shareholders.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">That's what she said Inc.</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 17:11:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Blog: Class Action Lawsuit Filed Over Sales Tax Issues | Wal-Mart Watch | Fighting for Wal-Mart Workers | Employee Free Choice Act</title><link>http://walmartwatchblog.disqus.com/blog_class_action_lawsuit_filed_over_sales_tax_issues_wal_mart_watch_fighting_for_wal_mart_workers_e/#comment-10400078</link><description>"It came after state tax officials refused to look into more than a dozen complaints I had forwarded them from customers who were required to pay sales taxes when they bought an item and again when they exchanged that item for a similar one. Most of the complaints involved Wal-Mart. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Wal-Mart charged the tax for people who didn’t have receipts as well as some who had credit card statements proving that they had bought the item recently. The taxes were turned over to the state. "&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I had to read the story again to see if I missed something.  Corey, did you by chance notice the sentence that said "the taxes were turned over to the state"?  So how again can you say "Our assumption, however is that like in Connecticut, THE COMPANY WOULD BE KEEPING THE DIFFERENCE"?  Did you not read the story and the facts?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">That's what she said Inc.</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 17:19:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Blog: Wal-Mart Watch Daily Clips - June 2nd | Wal-Mart Watch | Fighting for Wal-Mart Workers | Employee Free Choice Act</title><link>http://walmartwatchblog.disqus.com/blog_wal_mart_watch_daily_clips_june_2nd_wal_mart_watch_fighting_for_wal_mart_workers_employee_free_/#comment-10409479</link><description>Realist, keep the facts straight but you can still state the obvious.  The EFCA does NOT abolish the free ballot BUT it will effectivly render it null and void.  Why would a union stop at 30% and then call for the election when if they get 50% they can AND WILL stop right there and not even call for an election.  Why should they?  They won once they reach that point.  That's hypocracy of the Employee Free Choice Act... there is NOTHING employee free about it... unless you're a union who can't wait to get their hands on dues money of course.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The EFCA is the best spent union member dues you can find.  It's ashame the main thing it does is screw over the people they purport to support.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">That's what she said Inc.</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 23:25:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Blog: New Book Talks About Wal-Mart&amp;#8217;s Customer Service | Wal-Mart Watch | Fighting for Wal-Mart Workers | Employee Free Choice Act</title><link>http://walmartwatchblog.disqus.com/blog_new_book_talks_about_wal_mart8217s_customer_service_wal_mart_watch_fighting_for_wal_mart_worker/#comment-10409582</link><description>John what I check out is the Safeway in Crofton and now my standard MO is the check the receipt before I leave the store.  I can't tell you how many times I've had to go to the service counter to get a refund of the difference because of their errors.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">That's what she said Inc.</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 23:30:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Blog: Class Action Lawsuit Filed Over Sales Tax Issues | Wal-Mart Watch | Fighting for Wal-Mart Workers | Employee Free Choice Act</title><link>http://walmartwatchblog.disqus.com/blog_class_action_lawsuit_filed_over_sales_tax_issues_wal_mart_watch_fighting_for_wal_mart_workers_e/#comment-10452413</link><description>&lt;i&gt;If you're really interested in the "facts", you might do a little reading.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;That's pretty funny Ken since I'm a voracious reader and news junky when it comes to digging into facts.  I won't sit here and defend Walmart when they are wrong and i said as much in my earlier post BUT to slander them over an issue without presenting all of the facts (and this case even hearing Corey state incorrect facts and Jane just... well just being "slanted" Jane) no wonder it's hard to take other allegations seriously.  You really lose credibility.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Stick to the facts.  You should do some research yourself Ken.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">That's what she said Inc.</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 17:24:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Blog: Class Action Lawsuit Filed Over Sales Tax Issues | Wal-Mart Watch | Fighting for Wal-Mart Workers | Employee Free Choice Act</title><link>http://walmartwatchblog.disqus.com/blog_class_action_lawsuit_filed_over_sales_tax_issues_wal_mart_watch_fighting_for_wal_mart_workers_e/#comment-10452444</link><description>btw, I'm still waiting for Corey to apologize for posting incorrect information.  Let's see if WMW staff can live up to any credibility.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">That's what she said Inc.</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 17:25:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Blog: Class Action Lawsuit Filed Over Sales Tax Issues | Wal-Mart Watch | Fighting for Wal-Mart Workers | Employee Free Choice Act</title><link>http://walmartwatchblog.disqus.com/blog_class_action_lawsuit_filed_over_sales_tax_issues_wal_mart_watch_fighting_for_wal_mart_workers_e/#comment-10460591</link><description>That's a bunch of pure crap Ken.  If I thought the SEIU was breaking laws and I starting publishing slanderish posts stating as much (without a schred of evidence mind you) you don't think the SEIU would protect their interests?  Who are you kidding?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And again on the "walmart tax evasion".  Try "Ken tax evasion" and you get 419,000 Soogle hits!!!  So Ken, please tell us, are you a tax evader or is your logic on google searches just flawed?  I'll take the later since I'm smart enough to know your google test is a joke.  So why do you publish such rubbish?  You start to carry the same credibilities as the SEIU who controls this website... pure crap!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">That's what she said Inc.</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 22:30:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Blog: Class Action Lawsuit Filed Over Sales Tax Issues | Wal-Mart Watch | Fighting for Wal-Mart Workers | Employee Free Choice Act</title><link>http://walmartwatchblog.disqus.com/blog_class_action_lawsuit_filed_over_sales_tax_issues_wal_mart_watch_fighting_for_wal_mart_workers_e/#comment-10481003</link><description>&lt;i&gt;I resist taking newbies under my wing, Mark, so I hope you will learn to stand on your own two feet ASAP.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br&gt;ROFL!!!  What a condescending statement if I've ever heard one.  Do you live the rest of your life with such hubris?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;i&gt;So I wonder how you know there's not a shred of evidence?&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Wow Ken you're not doing a very good job of comprehending what you're reading.  Where did I say THIS lawsuit did not have a shred of evidence?  I suggest you re-read my posts before comment.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;i&gt;All a Google search indicates is the amount of information available. &lt;/i&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But yet you blatently use the 58,600 number to bolster your statement about Walmart and tax evasion.  If that's the case then my 419,000 is just as valid (but we both know neither number has any real meaning).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Ken, I hope you will learn to do a better job a comprehending what you are reading and have the wisdom to make intelligent comments in the future.  So far I'm not too impressed.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">That's what she said Inc.</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 08:47:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Blog: Class Action Lawsuit Filed Over Sales Tax Issues | Wal-Mart Watch | Fighting for Wal-Mart Workers | Employee Free Choice Act</title><link>http://walmartwatchblog.disqus.com/blog_class_action_lawsuit_filed_over_sales_tax_issues_wal_mart_watch_fighting_for_wal_mart_workers_e/#comment-10524384</link><description>OK Ken, what do you do if the customer has no receipt?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">That's what she said Inc.</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 12:28:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Blog: Class Action Lawsuit Filed Over Sales Tax Issues | Wal-Mart Watch | Fighting for Wal-Mart Workers | Employee Free Choice Act</title><link>http://walmartwatchblog.disqus.com/blog_class_action_lawsuit_filed_over_sales_tax_issues_wal_mart_watch_fighting_for_wal_mart_workers_e/#comment-10524745</link><description>Very nice comment Corey.  I give you higher marks for integrity and recognition of invalid statements than I do others on this site.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;i&gt;So the question - should companies like Wal-Mart, which take advantage of tax-dependent public services every day (roads, fire and water, public health, etc.) be reprimanded, even if only in the court of public opinion, for doing everything possible to pay as little to support these programs as they can?&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;OK I'll pose this question....&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;i&gt;So the question - should INDIVIDUAL US CITIZENS, which take advantage of tax-dependent public services every day (roads, fire and water, public health, etc.) be reprimanded, even if only in the court of public opinion, for doing everything possible to pay as little to support these programs as they can?&lt;/i&gt;  So should I be reprimanded for taking tax deductions like mortgage interest, child care, health insurance, dependents etc. even though they are legal deductions according to the IRS?  By taking those deductions am I not "supporting" government programs?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">That's what she said Inc.</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 12:37:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Blog: Class Action Lawsuit Filed Over Sales Tax Issues | Wal-Mart Watch | Fighting for Wal-Mart Workers | Employee Free Choice Act</title><link>http://walmartwatchblog.disqus.com/blog_class_action_lawsuit_filed_over_sales_tax_issues_wal_mart_watch_fighting_for_wal_mart_workers_e/#comment-10539445</link><description>No Ken, what would YOU do if the customer had no receipt?  How would you handle it as if YOU were the store owner?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">That's what she said Inc.</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 18:44:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Blog: Wal-Mart&amp;#8217;s 2009 Shareholders Meeting: All Show, Little Substance | Wal-Mart Watch | Fighting for Wal-Mart Workers | Employee Free Choice Act</title><link>http://walmartwatchblog.disqus.com/blog_wal_mart8217s_2009_shareholders_meeting_all_show_little_substance_wal_mart_watch_fighting_for_w/#comment-10586140</link><description>&lt;i&gt;I'd be interested in hearing you ladies talk about the wage caps and how they affect you personally. While you're at it, what about your hours?&lt;i/&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Do you mean like the GS grade and step scale wage caps used for government employees?  But somehow you think Walmart is evil for employing the same LOGICAL process in determining pay grade. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Hey Ken did't you say you were going after Walmart because they are the biggest?  If that's the theory you follow you should change your target to the federal government which IS THE LARGEST EMPLOYER in this country and growing ever more larger and bloated under the BO administration.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/i&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">That's what she said Inc.</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2009 08:21:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Blog: Class Action Lawsuit Filed Over Sales Tax Issues | Wal-Mart Watch | Fighting for Wal-Mart Workers | Employee Free Choice Act</title><link>http://walmartwatchblog.disqus.com/blog_class_action_lawsuit_filed_over_sales_tax_issues_wal_mart_watch_fighting_for_wal_mart_workers_e/#comment-10586234</link><description>&lt;i&gt;What I did say was my return policies didn't lead to a class-action suit. Period.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;When in TODAY'S REALITY the only reason you never faced a class-action lawsuit is because you didn't have deep pockets for lawyers to steal from in the "name of" class-action lawsuits.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Do you honestly think lawyers wouldn't have come after you if they thought you had money they could extort?&lt;br&gt;Even supposed great employers like Costco face them every day and why..... BECAUSE THEY HAVE MONEY.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Yes Ken, it's not that hard a concept to comprehend.  And I would think that even for you in that great bias of a mind you have.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">That's what she said Inc.</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2009 08:32:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Blog: Wal-Mart&amp;#8217;s 2009 Shareholders Meeting: All Show, Little Substance | Wal-Mart Watch | Fighting for Wal-Mart Workers | Employee Free Choice Act</title><link>http://walmartwatchblog.disqus.com/blog_wal_mart8217s_2009_shareholders_meeting_all_show_little_substance_wal_mart_watch_fighting_for_w/#comment-10609423</link><description>&lt;i&gt;I'll be honest with you, manneaters, I find your pro Wal-Mart zeal a little disturbing. Mixing spirituality and business is risky at best.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Ah, but you love SanDiegoView's posts though didn't you.  Just another example the hypocritical slant we can expect from you every day Ken.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">That's what she said Inc.</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 06:33:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Blog: Class Action Lawsuit Filed Over Sales Tax Issues | Wal-Mart Watch | Fighting for Wal-Mart Workers | Employee Free Choice Act</title><link>http://walmartwatchblog.disqus.com/blog_class_action_lawsuit_filed_over_sales_tax_issues_wal_mart_watch_fighting_for_wal_mart_workers_e/#comment-10710045</link><description>&lt;i&gt;The customer didn't get it and neither did the state. Who's left?&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And how do you know the state did not get it?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">That's what she said Inc.</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 15:32:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Blog: Class Action Lawsuit Filed Over Sales Tax Issues | Wal-Mart Watch | Fighting for Wal-Mart Workers | Employee Free Choice Act</title><link>http://walmartwatchblog.disqus.com/blog_class_action_lawsuit_filed_over_sales_tax_issues_wal_mart_watch_fighting_for_wal_mart_workers_e/#comment-10720039</link><description>I'll repeat it again for you Ken since you seem to be a little deaf when it comes to reading and so far short on facts.... HOW DO YOU KNOW the state did not get it?  Show us all the facts before you start accusing.  It's not that hard.  That's unless you like throwing baseless claims out there and turning useless information into something you think has value..... oh yea... I forgot you quote useless Google statistics on your searches.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;btw, I passed on your assumptions to your Google hits and you should have heard the howls of laughter coming from my friends in the computer/internet field.  It was worth a good laugh.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">That's what she said Inc.</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 17:59:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Blog: Wal-Mart&amp;#8217;s 2009 Shareholders Meeting: All Show, Little Substance | Wal-Mart Watch | Fighting for Wal-Mart Workers | Employee Free Choice Act</title><link>http://walmartwatchblog.disqus.com/blog_wal_mart8217s_2009_shareholders_meeting_all_show_little_substance_wal_mart_watch_fighting_for_w/#comment-10772147</link><description>Alex have you ever worked at a job?  I hear you bicker back and forth about how employees at Walmart are not treated well yet somehow they keep getting new people every day to work for them.  If Walmart was so bad then that obviously would not be the case.  It flys in the face of logic.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Now your response to RDS is "sounds like a secret society Bob".  What the blazes are you talking about????  Do you truly believe that Walmart is so different from tens of thousands of employers across the country?  Are you that nieve or just walking around with blinders on?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">That's what she said Inc.</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 20:55:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Blog: Wal-Mart&amp;#8217;s 2009 Shareholders Meeting: All Show, Little Substance | Wal-Mart Watch | Fighting for Wal-Mart Workers | Employee Free Choice Act</title><link>http://walmartwatchblog.disqus.com/blog_wal_mart8217s_2009_shareholders_meeting_all_show_little_substance_wal_mart_watch_fighting_for_w/#comment-10800964</link><description>Actually Alex you sound clueless to the world, but that's not surprising considering the posts I see you make.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">That's what she said Inc.</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 11:49:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Blog: Wal-Mart&amp;#8217;s 2009 Shareholders Meeting: All Show, Little Substance | Wal-Mart Watch | Fighting for Wal-Mart Workers | Employee Free Choice Act</title><link>http://walmartwatchblog.disqus.com/blog_wal_mart8217s_2009_shareholders_meeting_all_show_little_substance_wal_mart_watch_fighting_for_w/#comment-10826243</link><description>Sure thing!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;"Walmart figures it can gloss over its failings but under the surface the issues are trembling."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Yet Walmart continues to grow, even announcing how many new jobs and store openings in the next year?  It kind of (actually really does) fly in fact of your logic that "the issues are trembling".&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;"May I suggest that you need to go outside the Walmart company controlled media relations to truely hear what is happening in this discusting company."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;For any well versed argument you need to research your material.  To assume that being pro-walmart means drinking the "walmart only " koolaide is nothing short of idiotic.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;"Try going to another share holder meeting and experience a serious business environment."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Have you ever been to a share holder meeting Alex?... especially one of this size?  Probably not, but I HAVE and there is nothing new to how the agenda runs.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;"If it was people like YOU who have taken it [Walmart] to the top, why does Walmart and RDS(Bob) insist on keeping you at the bottom?"&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;So now where did RDS EVER say he wants to keep anyone at the bottom?  I look forward to that response.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;"Toyota and Honda have been making better cars than GM, Chrysler (and you forgot to include Ford in your anti-union rant...wonder why! LOL).&lt;br&gt;Most people care about the quality, not whether the person who built it was in a union."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I suggest you take that rant up with your union brotherhood if you think Toyota and Honda make better cars.  I think they would take issue with that anti-union stance.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And the Pièce de résistance.. "Sounds like a secret society Bob. Perhaps the Waltons are Freemasons? LOL"&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;All this coming from a person whom I suspect has not had a real job if he truly believes that how Walmart acts is abnormal in the real world.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Add it all up and it spells a bitter unskillled individual who feels nothing but contempt for anyone who achieves more than they do.  It's a typical liberal rant... "If I can't have it then you can't have it"  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;That my friends is Alex from Ontario, Canada.  It's a sad life.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">That's what she said Inc.</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 23:32:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Blog: Wal-Mart&amp;#8217;s 2009 Shareholders Meeting: All Show, Little Substance | Wal-Mart Watch | Fighting for Wal-Mart Workers | Employee Free Choice Act</title><link>http://walmartwatchblog.disqus.com/blog_wal_mart8217s_2009_shareholders_meeting_all_show_little_substance_wal_mart_watch_fighting_for_w/#comment-10836903</link><description>Is that all I could come up with?  Hey I only needed to mine THIS thread for all of those gems.  Could you imagine what I would come up with if I mined the archives as well?  Talk about an endless task based on this thread alone!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But don't worry, I'll be sure to point them out to you in the future.  I fully expect you to stick around (that's what makes this fun if you are a poster child for this site) so please don't go anywhere.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">That's what she said Inc.</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2009 08:48:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Blog: Wal-Mart&amp;#8217;s Inability to Build Stores in Wealthy Counties | Wal-Mart Watch | Fighting for Wal-Mart Workers | Employee Free Choice Act</title><link>http://walmartwatchblog.disqus.com/blog_wal_mart8217s_inability_to_build_stores_in_wealthy_counties_wal_mart_watch_fighting_for_wal_mar/#comment-10884120</link><description>You're kidding me right Jane?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Non-fact #1 - "You would think after all these years that Wal-Mart would know who their customers are"&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Wow who would have thought that..... coming from a company that does 400 BILLION dollars worth of business every year.  Yea, I guess you are right.  Walmart doesn't know what their customer wants and they can't sell them anything.  LMAO!!!!!!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Non-fact #2 - "People who shop there CANNOT AFFORD TO SHOP AT HIGHER PRICED STORES"&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I can afford some higher prices and I too shop at stores other than Walmart.  So you're wrong again Jane.  I love to shop at Walmart the most because not only do I get good prices but I can walk into one store and cover so many of my needs in one stop.  I LOVE my local Walmart Super Store.  It's the best and I pretty know where to find everything I need when I walk in the door like most recurring Walmart shoppers.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Jane Myth#1 - "With this in mind why would Wal-Mart bother to enter richer neighborhoods? Because they just want to be everywhere. But if they REALLY KNEW who their customers were they would stop trying to enter those parts of town. "&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;As a retail store why would you NOT want to set up shop in more wealther areas?  That's how Costco survives.  They would never make it in poorer neighborhoods.  And considering the fact that I debunked your "walmart caters to people who can't afford higher prices" theory that makes this statment by you a complete myth.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Man those facts flying in your face must really kill you sometimes Jane.  I hope the future treats you better than your past and may the wisdom of fact finally find its way to your doorstep.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">That's what she said Inc.</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 14 Jun 2009 10:03:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Blog: Wal-Mart&amp;#8217;s Inability to Build Stores in Wealthy Counties | Wal-Mart Watch | Fighting for Wal-Mart Workers | Employee Free Choice Act</title><link>http://walmartwatchblog.disqus.com/blog_wal_mart8217s_inability_to_build_stores_in_wealthy_counties_wal_mart_watch_fighting_for_wal_mar/#comment-10904566</link><description>&lt;i&gt;Oh, how soon we forget. How did those 'upscale' Supercenters work out for Wal-Mart, Mark, with their fake wood floors and $500 bottles of wine?&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;So even when Walmart fails they still bring in over 400 BILLION in sales.  Just think of their revenue if they were right all of the time!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;btw, this recession is all BO's now.  While we're at it all of these 2 TRILLION DOLLAR deficits are going to be great for my kids and grandkids.  I feel sorry for them.  He's taken bad and made so much worse and we've only just begun the destruction if he get's his way.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Did you hear Biden today talking about how successful the stimulous has been so far yet Gregory on MTP asked him "then why has the unemployment number gone up 2 more percentage points during that time?"  Ugh... dugh... hm...  What a gaffe filled baffoon.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">That's what she said Inc.</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 14 Jun 2009 21:19:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Blog: Wal-Mart&amp;#8217;s Inability to Build Stores in Wealthy Counties | Wal-Mart Watch | Fighting for Wal-Mart Workers | Employee Free Choice Act</title><link>http://walmartwatchblog.disqus.com/blog_wal_mart8217s_inability_to_build_stores_in_wealthy_counties_wal_mart_watch_fighting_for_wal_mar/#comment-10929984</link><description>Wow, so 400 BILLION in revenue but only a small profit.  I'd say they are doing right by their customer base and not trying to make a killing by overpricing it's goods.  They'll take less profit/unit sold vs. the competition.  The only greed that demonstrates is the overpricing of goods by their competition.  I see it all of the time when I price shop Walmart to stores like Safeway and Target.  It's highway robber how they gouge the consumer.  Just another reason to shop Walmart.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;i&gt;Walmart, we are doing what's best for the customer even though it may not help our bottom line &lt;/i&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">That's what she said Inc.</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 10:10:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Blog: Friday Speak Out Round Up | Wal-Mart Watch | Fighting for Wal-Mart Workers | Employee Free Choice Act</title><link>http://walmartwatchblog.disqus.com/blog_friday_speak_out_round_up_wal_mart_watch_fighting_for_wal_mart_workers_employee_free_choice_act/#comment-10949852</link><description>&lt;i&gt;And by the way college costs big bucks. So does trade and technical schools. Education past high school isn't free! If this type of education were free most Wal-Mart employees would probably sign up for it.i&amp;gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Oh, that's a bunch of crap Jane.  You could attend a local community college for the first 2 years of your academic career and walk away with an AA degree for less than 4k/year.  I should know.  I worked my way through 1 year at a community college before transfering to a 4 year state university to complete my BS degree.  I then followed it up with an MBA 3 years later.  I PAID FOR MY TUITION EVERY STEOP OF THE WAY AS WELL AS MY LIVING EXPENSES &amp;lt; $10/hr jobs through undergraduate education and a $13/hr job right after I got out of undergraduate.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But if you gave away college educations like we do high school educations there would stll be tens of millions of people who won't complete the requesite.  And there's a simple answer for that.... THEY DON'T WANT TO DO THE HARD WORK to get it done.  I don't care of you work at Walmart or McDonalds, if you want an education it's there for the taking.  And if you need financial help their are rows and rows of public and private assistance out there to help you.&lt;/i&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">That's what she said Inc.</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 18:21:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Blog: Wal-Mart&amp;#8217;s Inability to Build Stores in Wealthy Counties | Wal-Mart Watch | Fighting for Wal-Mart Workers | Employee Free Choice Act</title><link>http://walmartwatchblog.disqus.com/blog_wal_mart8217s_inability_to_build_stores_in_wealthy_counties_wal_mart_watch_fighting_for_wal_mar/#comment-10950337</link><description>Jane you live in an utter dream world.  Point out the facts to you and you shutter in disgust.  Let's try a few more FACTS shall we.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;1.  Has Walmart failed at trying retail ventures?  ABSOLUTELY they have, just like every other retailer and every human being alive.  Does that mean they "don't know who their customers are"?  If your theory holds true then every other retail establishment must not know their customers either because of their failures.  But in this case I guess Walmart knows their customers "better" than their competitors because they sell alot more to them.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;2.  "They want to be everything to everyone, and in the retail business it can't be done."  100% everything to everyone?  That's like saying it will be sunny every day of the year.  Statistically impossible.  So then why do you claim that Walmart wants to be "everything to everyone" when they darn well that will never happen.  Walmart picks their targets and markets just like every other retailer.  But I love that fact I can walk into Walmart and pick up my groceries, car supplies, garden supplies, household items, etcc. all in one stop.  Now that's a competitive advantage!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;3.  "I will also stand by what I said earlier--those who shop at Wal-Mart CANNOT AFFORD TO SHOP AT HIGHER PRICED STORES. What you told me is that YOU shop at higher priced stores! But apparently you are now speaking for MILLIONS OF OTHER WAL-MART SHOPPERS!!"  But I shop at Walmart and I can afford to shop at higher priced stores.  Thus Jane, YOUR STATEMENT IS PATENTLY FALSE!  I never said I spoke for millions of other Walmart shoppers (but apparently you are by making your statement).  I don't speak for anyone but myself.  It's just too easy pointing out the idiocy of your statement.  Doesn't your hypocracy just kill you sometimes Jane?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If you don't like Walmart then please feel free not to patronize them.  I'm sure they won't take it personally... their probably too busy serving the other tens of millions of customers to really even notice you missing.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">That's what she said Inc.</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 18:38:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Blog: Wal-Mart&amp;#8217;s Inability to Build Stores in Wealthy Counties | Wal-Mart Watch | Fighting for Wal-Mart Workers | Employee Free Choice Act</title><link>http://walmartwatchblog.disqus.com/blog_wal_mart8217s_inability_to_build_stores_in_wealthy_counties_wal_mart_watch_fighting_for_wal_mar/#comment-11057542</link><description>&lt;i&gt;That's a great opinion, RDS, unfortunately the facts don't back it up. &lt;/i&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Welfare, food stamps, housing subsidies, earn income tax credits, etc.  And the Democrats have NOTHING to do with those policies over the last 60 years?  Wow, talk about revisionist theory.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">That's what she said Inc.</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 15:26:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Blog: Wal-Mart&amp;#8217;s Inability to Build Stores in Wealthy Counties | Wal-Mart Watch | Fighting for Wal-Mart Workers | Employee Free Choice Act</title><link>http://walmartwatchblog.disqus.com/blog_wal_mart8217s_inability_to_build_stores_in_wealthy_counties_wal_mart_watch_fighting_for_wal_mar/#comment-11094353</link><description>&lt;i&gt;You warped Right Wing-nuts actually believe those programs were designed to keep people poor? Bwa-ha-ha-ha! Raising the minimum wage also helps keep people poor too, right?&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Wow Ken, and I all along I was giving you credit for some intelligence in your posts.  If you actually believe programs like this don't indoctrinate, and keep them indoctrinated, into a nanny-state you must sorely lack the necessary skills to understand human nature.  You're statement just floored me.  With good intentions come unintended consequences and government dependency is the ultimate after-effect of such social programs.  RDS is right, if these programs were designed to help people then they wouldn't be living on them year after year AS their life.  Your niavety is just breathtaking.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/i&gt;The fact is the corrupt, greedy Investor Class took the economy for more money than all your despised social programs put together.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Would you care to share those $ with us?  I've love to see your take on such a deluded statement.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">That's what she said Inc.</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 09:17:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Blog: Wal-Mart Watch Daily Clips - June 18th | Wal-Mart Watch | Fighting for Wal-Mart Workers | Employee Free Choice Act</title><link>http://walmartwatchblog.disqus.com/blog_wal_mart_watch_daily_clips_june_18th_wal_mart_watch_fighting_for_wal_mart_workers_employee_free/#comment-11235988</link><description>Ah I can see it now.... "Yes Mr. Walmart employee, can you please help me tell the difference between the Lays potatoe chips and the Utz brand?"&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Yep, I absolutely need that type of customer service.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">That's what she said Inc.</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 22:18:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Blog: Wal-Mart Grocery Plan Off Track | Wal-Mart Watch | Fighting for Wal-Mart Workers | Employee Free Choice Act</title><link>http://walmartwatchblog.disqus.com/blog_wal_mart_grocery_plan_off_track_wal_mart_watch_fighting_for_wal_mart_workers_employee_free_choi/#comment-11252306</link><description>&lt;i&gt;A grocery chain called "Wegmens" was at the top of the list.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Jane have you seen the prices at Wegmans compared to other retailers?  It's outrageous.  You could probably take my $100 Walmart grocery bill and add easily 20% to it.  It even puts unionized Safeway to shame.  That 20% add up easily over time and as I said I really don't need anyone from customer service to tell me the difference between Lays and Utz potatoe chips, certainly not for 20% more.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;btw, when I made my return of my dryer to Best Buy 2 months ago they made me fill out my full name and address before processing my refund.  Does that mean that Best Buy is just as "bad" as Walmart?  I also had to several merchandise items to a Walmart store in Orlando in March of this year.  I certainly don't remember filling out anything looking for my name and address.  So how old is that book?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">That's what she said Inc.</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 22:30:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Blog: Friday Speak Out Round Up: | Wal-Mart Watch | Fighting for Wal-Mart Workers | Employee Free Choice Act</title><link>http://walmartwatchblog.disqus.com/blog_friday_speak_out_round_up_wal_mart_watch_fighting_for_wal_mart_workers_employee_free_choice__46/#comment-11516584</link><description>ScrewedbyWalmart.  Welcome back!  But I thought you were going to not post here any more showing your solidarity with SanDiegoView due to this site's censorship?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">That's what she said Inc.</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2009 18:42:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Blog: Friday Speak Out Round Up: | Wal-Mart Watch | Fighting for Wal-Mart Workers | Employee Free Choice Act</title><link>http://walmartwatchblog.disqus.com/blog_friday_speak_out_round_up_wal_mart_watch_fighting_for_wal_mart_workers_employee_free_choice__46/#comment-11516629</link><description>In this case I abolutely agree with Ken.  If you believe you have a legal case against Walmart (or any other merchant for that matter) then by all means SUE THEM!  That's why we have a court of law and I would find it hard to believe that you could not find a lawyer to take your case considering the deep pockets of Walmart and the validity with which you claim.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">That's what she said Inc.</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2009 18:44:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Blog: Wal-Mart Grocery Plan Off Track | Wal-Mart Watch | Fighting for Wal-Mart Workers | Employee Free Choice Act</title><link>http://walmartwatchblog.disqus.com/blog_wal_mart_grocery_plan_off_track_wal_mart_watch_fighting_for_wal_mart_workers_employee_free_choi/#comment-11516979</link><description>&lt;i&gt;Remember Mary? Not long after she made a fool of herself by declaring there was no quality difference in toilet paper, she vanished, never to be heard from again.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Wow Ken, how blatent a liar can you be?  To now make up stories in order to prove your "worthness" really puts your cognative abilities in question.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;For the intelligent viewing audience please take a look at this quote and tell me where Ken has profoundly mistated the facts here.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;i&gt;Ken, do you mean the Cottonelle 12pk I bought yesterday at Walmart for $8.73 vs. my local Safeway that was selling THE EXACT SAME THING FOR $10.49.  I think I can tell the difference when I CAN PURCHASE THE EXACT SAME THING for $1.76 less. &lt;/i&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://walmartwatch.com/blog/archives/does_wal_mart_really_help_the_working_class/" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://walmartwatch.com/blog/archives/does_wal_...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Pretty dumb move Ken.  You keep sinking lower every day in you biased statements in support of your abject hatred for Walmart.  But the lies... that takes your arguments to a whole new level.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">That's what she said Inc.</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2009 19:04:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Blog: Wal-Mart Grocery Plan Off Track | Wal-Mart Watch | Fighting for Wal-Mart Workers | Employee Free Choice Act</title><link>http://walmartwatchblog.disqus.com/blog_wal_mart_grocery_plan_off_track_wal_mart_watch_fighting_for_wal_mart_workers_employee_free_choi/#comment-11541332</link><description>What Ken.... you can't even admit when you posted false information and worse yet portrayed it as fact?  It's a pretty sad display but yet a more obvious lack of integrity.  I guess the "personal integrity thing" was not taught in your family.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">That's what she said Inc.</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 21 Jun 2009 21:07:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Blog: Wal-Mart Grocery Plan Off Track | Wal-Mart Watch | Fighting for Wal-Mart Workers | Employee Free Choice Act</title><link>http://walmartwatchblog.disqus.com/blog_wal_mart_grocery_plan_off_track_wal_mart_watch_fighting_for_wal_mart_workers_employee_free_choi/#comment-11552268</link><description>&lt;i&gt; Mary's "same-for-less" posture was an adjustment from her initial "no-quality-difference" blunder.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;OK, point me to that post then so I can understand what the discussion was about.  Otherwise we'll just stick with "Ken lied" and can't admit when he lied and combine that with "it's every reader's personal responsiblity to determine for themselves what is true and what is false." pretty much leaves major doubts as to the credibility in anything Ken posts here.  I'll certainly remember that.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">That's what she said Inc.</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 08:22:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Blog: Wal-Mart Grocery Plan Off Track | Wal-Mart Watch | Fighting for Wal-Mart Workers | Employee Free Choice Act</title><link>http://walmartwatchblog.disqus.com/blog_wal_mart_grocery_plan_off_track_wal_mart_watch_fighting_for_wal_mart_workers_employee_free_choi/#comment-11621483</link><description>Thanks Ken for reinforcing my point that you still lied and to add to it it also indicates your comprension skills are sorely lacking. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;So tell me again Ken where her post said "there was no quality difference in toilet paper"?  Or if YOU HAD READ what was said it talks about the RELEVANCE of the quality for such things as toilet paper.   HUGE HUGE DIFFERENCE and a COMPLETE MISTATEMENT on your part.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And btw Ken, you claim that "Not long after she made a fool of herself by declaring there was no quality difference in toilet paper, she vanished, never to be heard from again." yet I still find posts from her several weeks after the original post in question.  So tell us again how "she vanished... not long after"?  I don't think the anti-walmart crowd did much to scare her off.  She probably came to the same conclusions I am coming to that the anti-walmart crowd let's their bias cloud any logical conclusions so not much is accomplished by having any type of dialogue.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;So how are those reseach skills of "old guy" compared to the "newby"?...... my bet still says sorely lacking.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">That's what she said Inc.</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 11:11:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Blog: Wal-Mart Grocery Plan Off Track | Wal-Mart Watch | Fighting for Wal-Mart Workers | Employee Free Choice Act</title><link>http://walmartwatchblog.disqus.com/blog_wal_mart_grocery_plan_off_track_wal_mart_watch_fighting_for_wal_mart_workers_employee_free_choi/#comment-11681872</link><description>"there is no quality difference in toilet paper"&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;vs.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;"the quality part(y) really don't matter"&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And you CAN'T tell the difference between these 2 statements Ken?  What substandard education did you receive that you so sorely lack the comprehension skill to understand the english language?  My 3rd grader can even explain the difference to me.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The only fool around here and in particular this thread is you Ken.  But then again you've also graced these blogs with your Google seach theory which gets laughed at by any one with any semblence of knowledge of how Google searches work.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;btw, I'm not sure what you were reading but the references to these past blog entries were in 2008 NOT 2007, June and July to be exact.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">That's what she said Inc.</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 10:35:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Blog: Wal-Mart Grocery Plan Off Track | Wal-Mart Watch | Fighting for Wal-Mart Workers | Employee Free Choice Act</title><link>http://walmartwatchblog.disqus.com/blog_wal_mart_grocery_plan_off_track_wal_mart_watch_fighting_for_wal_mart_workers_employee_free_choi/#comment-11699238</link><description>Oh, you're right Ken.  Your quote does come from a July, 2007 post.  I didn't catch that.  But what I did catch was my quote which dates to &lt;b&gt;JUNE 2008&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;So I guess this also confirms your &lt;i&gt;Remember Mary? Not long after she made a fool of herself by declaring there was no quality difference in toilet paper, she vanished, never to be heard from again.&lt;/i&gt; statement to be false as well since she was still posting almost a year later.  That's unless your concept of "not long after" is as screwed up as your english comprehension skills and Google search statistics.  Nice job Ken!  Applause!!!!!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">That's what she said Inc.</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 16:47:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Blog: Wal-Mart Grocery Plan Off Track | Wal-Mart Watch | Fighting for Wal-Mart Workers | Employee Free Choice Act</title><link>http://walmartwatchblog.disqus.com/blog_wal_mart_grocery_plan_off_track_wal_mart_watch_fighting_for_wal_mart_workers_employee_free_choi/#comment-11727649</link><description>Enough of beating a dead horse.  Let's just agree to move on.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;but I do like this line...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;i&gt;just seemed to vanish despite the fact she apparently hung around for another year&lt;/i&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">That's what she said Inc.</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 11:47:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Blog: Workers Speak Out: Despite Calls for Reform, Wal-Mart Still Shortchanging Workers on Health Care | Wal-Mart Watch | Fighting for Wal-Mart Workers | Employee Free Choice Act</title><link>http://walmartwatchblog.disqus.com/blog_workers_speak_out_despite_calls_for_reform_wal_mart_still_shortchanging_workers_on_health_care_/#comment-11844082</link><description>"Nowadays, I truly prefer shopping at any store, other than a Walmart store."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And that's the way it should be.  I can't say I particularly look forward to spending more money shopping at Safeway stores vs. my local Walmart BUT IT'S MY CHOICE.  If you don't like Walmart then don't shop there, but sure as heck DON'T TELL ME WHERE I SHOULD AND SHOULD NOT BE SHOPPING.  It's my business.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">That's what she said Inc.</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 27 Jun 2009 21:47:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Blog: Union Certification Overturned In Saskatchewan | Wal-Mart Watch | Fighting for Wal-Mart Workers | Employee Free Choice Act</title><link>http://walmartwatchblog.disqus.com/blog_union_certification_overturned_in_saskatchewan_wal_mart_watch_fighting_for_wal_mart_workers_emp/#comment-11867236</link><description>So Ken, let's revisit that toilet paper issue again and what Mary said.  Please tell us all what is the difference in the Cottenelle toilet paper sold at Walmart vs. a unionzed Safeway store..... sans the price of course because we know that is different.  Why would I as a consumer WANT to pay more money FOR THE EXACT SAME PRODUCT?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">That's what she said Inc.</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 28 Jun 2009 22:01:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Blog: Workers Speak Out: Despite Calls for Reform, Wal-Mart Still Shortchanging Workers on Health Care | Wal-Mart Watch | Fighting for Wal-Mart Workers | Employee Free Choice Act</title><link>http://walmartwatchblog.disqus.com/blog_workers_speak_out_despite_calls_for_reform_wal_mart_still_shortchanging_workers_on_health_care_/#comment-11878737</link><description>&lt;i&gt;Like the Anti Wal-Mart Movement has put up barricades around the stores and you have to fight your way in.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;hm..... Haven't I been reading stories on this site recently about communities NOT letting Walmart build in their area?  What about the potential customers denied the ability to able to shop at a local Walmart all due to an anti-Walmart crowd?  I certainly would call that a barricade.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">That's what she said Inc.</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 07:24:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Blog: Workers Speak Out: Despite Calls for Reform, Wal-Mart Still Shortchanging Workers on Health Care | Wal-Mart Watch | Fighting for Wal-Mart Workers | Employee Free Choice Act</title><link>http://walmartwatchblog.disqus.com/blog_workers_speak_out_despite_calls_for_reform_wal_mart_still_shortchanging_workers_on_health_care_/#comment-11917988</link><description>Well then by god Jane please tell these employees to go buy health insurance!!!  And if they can't afford it they need to start looking at where they do spend their discretionary money.  And if that doesn't work they should find a job that pays them more money if Walmart does not pay them enough.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;With so much talk about how "poor" Walmart treats their employees it should be easy for them to find a BETTER job that pays more money with better benefits.  But then again if that logic held true then Walmart would not be able to recruit MILLIONS of associates to work for them.  Of course that factual logic goes against the anti-Walmart grain of propaganda doesn't it.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">That's what she said Inc.</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 20:07:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Blog: Workers Speak Out: Despite Calls for Reform, Wal-Mart Still Shortchanging Workers on Health Care | Wal-Mart Watch | Fighting for Wal-Mart Workers | Employee Free Choice Act</title><link>http://walmartwatchblog.disqus.com/blog_workers_speak_out_despite_calls_for_reform_wal_mart_still_shortchanging_workers_on_health_care_/#comment-11918034</link><description>&lt;i&gt;Yeah, let's cram Wal-Mart down the throats of communities that don't want them so the only choice they have is Wal-Mart's cheap Chinese inventory.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And what do you say to the people who DO want a Walmart in their area?  Just suck it up because your individual choices make no difference to us?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">That's what she said Inc.</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 20:09:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Blog: Workers Speak Out: Despite Calls for Reform, Wal-Mart Still Shortchanging Workers on Health Care | Wal-Mart Watch | Fighting for Wal-Mart Workers | Employee Free Choice Act</title><link>http://walmartwatchblog.disqus.com/blog_workers_speak_out_despite_calls_for_reform_wal_mart_still_shortchanging_workers_on_health_care_/#comment-11923230</link><description>&lt;/i&gt;I'd say to the people "who DO want a Walmart" that they are a minority living in a democracy. &lt;/i&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;That's such a laughable comment.  Tell that to the MILLIONS of people that frequent Walmart stores every day... you are a "minority".  LMAO!!!!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;i&gt;Liberals have a bad habit of making up rules based on feeling and what they think is best for everyone else reguardless of what the people want&lt;/i&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">That's what she said Inc.</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 23:36:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Blog: Workers Speak Out: Despite Calls for Reform, Wal-Mart Still Shortchanging Workers on Health Care | Wal-Mart Watch | Fighting for Wal-Mart Workers | Employee Free Choice Act</title><link>http://walmartwatchblog.disqus.com/blog_workers_speak_out_despite_calls_for_reform_wal_mart_still_shortchanging_workers_on_health_care_/#comment-11931637</link><description>&lt;i&gt;Apparently those "MILLIONS of people" don't live in New York, L.A., or Lake Placid. &lt;/i&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Ah, but by denying Walmart the ability to build in such areas as NY, LA and Chicago MILLIONS and MILLIONS of consumers ARE DENIED the ability to shop there.  But the political and union waters certainly wouldn't want happy citizens if it doesn't meet THEIR needs.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">That's what she said Inc.</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 09:13:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Blog: Workers Speak Out: Despite Calls for Reform, Wal-Mart Still Shortchanging Workers on Health Care | Wal-Mart Watch | Fighting for Wal-Mart Workers | Employee Free Choice Act</title><link>http://walmartwatchblog.disqus.com/blog_workers_speak_out_despite_calls_for_reform_wal_mart_still_shortchanging_workers_on_health_care_/#comment-11942326</link><description>&lt;i&gt;To begin with the union's "power" is presently at it's lowest ebb in decades so they don't get much credit yet.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And what rock have you been living under Ken?  Just listen to BO and this administrator and even what has been spewing out of Andy Stern's mouth since BO was elected...  The union's power is stronger today then at any time over the past 30 years.  And just wait to see what happens with the EFCA act never makes it through congress.  Head will roll in the Democratic party.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">That's what she said Inc.</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 14:13:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Blog: Workers Speak Out: Despite Calls for Reform, Wal-Mart Still Shortchanging Workers on Health Care | Wal-Mart Watch | Fighting for Wal-Mart Workers | Employee Free Choice Act</title><link>http://walmartwatchblog.disqus.com/blog_workers_speak_out_despite_calls_for_reform_wal_mart_still_shortchanging_workers_on_health_care_/#comment-11946812</link><description>So Ken, please tell us at what time in the last 30 years was the union more able to push through their anti-business agenda of EFCA?  Tell us how unions will control 65% of Chrysler and 17.5% of GM after the government driven bankruptcy even though their financial "skin in the game" was minimal and not as status a level compared to the bondholders?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Then tell us again how my statement was "patently false".  Don't kid yourself to think that unions have not bought their way into the political kingdom and control of the Democrats.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">That's what she said Inc.</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 16:06:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Blog: Today&amp;#8217;s Final Word on Health Care | Wal-Mart Watch | Fighting for Wal-Mart Workers | Employee Free Choice Act</title><link>http://walmartwatchblog.disqus.com/blog_today8217s_final_word_on_health_care_wal_mart_watch_fighting_for_wal_mart_workers_employee_free/#comment-12231403</link><description>I'm a "salaried type" and I had 70/30 burgers on my grill.  I guess you "slave labor associates" had it good compared to me.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">That's what she said Inc.</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 18:44:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Blog: Happy 4th of July, From Your Friends at Wal-Mart Watch | Wal-Mart Watch | Fighting for Wal-Mart Workers | Employee Free Choice Act</title><link>http://walmartwatchblog.disqus.com/blog_happy_4th_of_july_from_your_friends_at_wal_mart_watch_wal_mart_watch_fighting_for_wal_mart_work/#comment-12249337</link><description>ScrewedbyWalmart... what are you doing posting here again?  I thought you said you would not post here any more in solidarity with SDV because he believed &lt;a href="http://Walmartwatch.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;Walmartwatch.com&lt;/a&gt; incorrectly censored him?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">That's what she said Inc.</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 07:55:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Blog: Al Norman: Chicago Alderman Still Hungers For Wal-Jobs | Wal-Mart Watch | Fighting for Wal-Mart Workers | Employee Free Choice Act</title><link>http://walmartwatchblog.disqus.com/blog_al_norman_chicago_alderman_still_hungers_for_wal_jobs_wal_mart_watch_fighting_for_wal_mart_work/#comment-12494008</link><description>So Jane would they be running the Walmart store on only 22 employees or were these 22 new positions figured in after your supposed "loss 3 jobs for every Wal-Mart jobs created"?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">That's what she said Inc.</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 23:31:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Blog: Wal-Mart&amp;#8217;s Negligence Leads to Death of 5 Year Old | Wal-Mart Watch | Fighting for Wal-Mart Workers | Employee Free Choice Act</title><link>http://walmartwatchblog.disqus.com/blog_wal_mart8217s_negligence_leads_to_death_of_5_year_old_wal_mart_watch_fighting_for_wal_mart_work/#comment-12500465</link><description>&lt;i&gt;I love the lengths you folks will go to to absolve Wal-Mart of any responsibility.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And I find it hard to believe the lengths you folks go to to absolve everyone BUT Wal-Mart of any responsibility.... not just in this incident but in so many others if you follow this website.  What is Wal-Mart going to be responsible for next.... a meteor hitting the planet?  How about Boston area only have a few days of sunshine the past 2 months?  Is that Wal-Marts fault as well in some devious plot to get more customers to shop in their stores?  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;WalmartWatch is like the crying child looking for attention, the only problem is after a while no one is paying attention with so much crap posted.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">That's what she said Inc.</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2009 08:37:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Blog: Guest Book Review: To Serve God and Wal-Mart, by Bethany Moreton | Wal-Mart Watch | Fighting for Wal-Mart Workers | Employee Free Choice Act</title><link>http://walmartwatchblog.disqus.com/blog_guest_book_review_to_serve_god_and_wal_mart_by_bethany_moreton_wal_mart_watch_fighting_for_wal_/#comment-12798824</link><description>&lt;i&gt;Call me an optimist but when I read how totally screwed up their world view is, I naively believe I can open their eyes.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;So my view of the world is totally screwed up?  You my friend have been smoking the liberal dope for way too long because it has severely messed up your judgement skills.  I can surely guarantee that my views are so well grounded in fact and logic that I am willing to take a stand and welcome anyone to try and prove where I'm wrong.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;That's so much UNLIKE how your friends, BO and majority congress, have been running things the past 6 months.  There starting to run scared now and BO knows if he doesn't get what he wants now then he's dead in his tracks as our fearless liberal leaders have to go home to face their constuencies come August and it won't be pretty.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">That's what she said Inc.</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 23:49:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Blog: Wal-Mart getting it both ways on health care | Wal-Mart Watch | Fighting for Wal-Mart Workers | Employee Free Choice Act</title><link>http://walmartwatchblog.disqus.com/blog_wal_mart_getting_it_both_ways_on_health_care_wal_mart_watch_fighting_for_wal_mart_workers_emplo/#comment-12857135</link><description>Why so much hatred from you ScrewebyWalmart?  Boy RDS must really get to you to be so incensed to want to insult him every chance you get.  Very sad.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">That's what she said Inc.</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 20:46:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Blog: Wal-Mart&amp;#8217;s Negligence Leads to Death of 5 Year Old | Wal-Mart Watch | Fighting for Wal-Mart Workers | Employee Free Choice Act</title><link>http://walmartwatchblog.disqus.com/blog_wal_mart8217s_negligence_leads_to_death_of_5_year_old_wal_mart_watch_fighting_for_wal_mart_work/#comment-12857220</link><description>More personal insults and name calling ScrewedbyWalmart?  Were you the big bully on the street as you grew up?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">That's what she said Inc.</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 20:50:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Blog: Guest Book Review: To Serve God and Wal-Mart, by Bethany Moreton | Wal-Mart Watch | Fighting for Wal-Mart Workers | Employee Free Choice Act</title><link>http://walmartwatchblog.disqus.com/blog_guest_book_review_to_serve_god_and_wal_mart_by_bethany_moreton_wal_mart_watch_fighting_for_wal_/#comment-12858476</link><description>And what makes you think it was eight years of "my way"?  I'm a fiscal conservative.  Nothing over the past 8 years was fiscally conservative.  I didn't just wake up yesterday to the BO &amp; co. BS.  Central government is corrupt at all levels and in all parties.  Anyone who believes otherwise is dilusional.  Central controlling government is not the solution to the problems we face.  It's what's keeping us from solving the problems.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Now I will say again...." I can surely guarantee that my views are so well grounded in fact and logic that I am willing to take a stand and welcome anyone to try and prove where I'm wrong."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I'm waiting... and btw, to quote a left wing blog with such biased beliefs shows only your true bias.  If you were a thief you would probably share the same beliefs of other thieves.  If you're a left wingnut you probably share the same beliefs as... well, you get the point. (probably)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">That's what she said Inc.</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 21:46:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Blog: Al Norman: New York, NY TIAA-CREF Urged To Divest Wal-Mart Stock | Wal-Mart Watch | Fighting for Wal-Mart Workers | Employee Free Choice Act</title><link>http://walmartwatchblog.disqus.com/blog_al_norman_new_york_ny_tiaa_cref_urged_to_divest_wal_mart_stock_wal_mart_watch_fighting_for_wal_/#comment-12881566</link><description>&lt;i&gt;Having one store (Wal-Mart) to shop is not having a choice and I know of no anti Wal-Mart folks who have prevented anyone from shopping where they choose.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I have plenty of stores to shop at and Walmart is the only store I patronize, BUT when a community or local government stops Walmart from building in their community THEY ARE DENYING their neighbors the ability to shop at a Walmart.  It happened around here when people complained when Walmart wanted to build a superstore... the complaints centered around how much traffic it would generate for the area.  So instead they put in a Target, a few restaurants and condos.  So how's that for taking care of the traffic.  It's all BS.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">That's what she said Inc.</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 18 Jul 2009 13:05:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Blog: Al Norman: New York, NY TIAA-CREF Urged To Divest Wal-Mart Stock | Wal-Mart Watch | Fighting for Wal-Mart Workers | Employee Free Choice Act</title><link>http://walmartwatchblog.disqus.com/blog_al_norman_new_york_ny_tiaa_cref_urged_to_divest_wal_mart_stock_wal_mart_watch_fighting_for_wal_/#comment-12881582</link><description>That should read "Walmart is NOT the only store I patronize"</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">That's what she said Inc.</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 18 Jul 2009 13:06:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Blog: Wal-Mart getting it both ways on health care | Wal-Mart Watch | Fighting for Wal-Mart Workers | Employee Free Choice Act</title><link>http://walmartwatchblog.disqus.com/blog_wal_mart_getting_it_both_ways_on_health_care_wal_mart_watch_fighting_for_wal_mart_workers_emplo/#comment-12881612</link><description>From the posts I've seen from you ddrb I KNOW you suffer from a little of the "pot calling the kettle black".</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">That's what she said Inc.</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 18 Jul 2009 13:08:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Blog: Wal-Mart getting it both ways on health care | Wal-Mart Watch | Fighting for Wal-Mart Workers | Employee Free Choice Act</title><link>http://walmartwatchblog.disqus.com/blog_wal_mart_getting_it_both_ways_on_health_care_wal_mart_watch_fighting_for_wal_mart_workers_emplo/#comment-12881658</link><description>&lt;i&gt;Someone, bbrd, Mark, and a host of other loonies that have come and gone here all could be the same person.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And Ken V, ScrewbyWalmart, ddrb and Alex from CA all could be the same person.  They all sound the same to me with their LEFT wing-nut theories.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">That's what she said Inc.</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 18 Jul 2009 13:10:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Blog: Guest Book Review: To Serve God and Wal-Mart, by Bethany Moreton | Wal-Mart Watch | Fighting for Wal-Mart Workers | Employee Free Choice Act</title><link>http://walmartwatchblog.disqus.com/blog_guest_book_review_to_serve_god_and_wal_mart_by_bethany_moreton_wal_mart_watch_fighting_for_wal_/#comment-12882858</link><description>Yet somehow Ken you think I'm a staunch defender of GWB and Republicans?  I never try and re-write history and I will certainly not defend the Republicans who have lost all their conservative values.  It's what's created the great disconnect between the party and it's constituents.  And if the Republicans don't get their act together and get back to their core principals they will go no where in regaining leadership.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But somehow I surmise by your post you are a staunch supporter of the LIBERAL Democratic party... and they can do no wrong.  Let me remind you that come 2006 the Dems had complete control over the house and senate.  Things started to go down hill 9 months after they took over and have headed even deeper.  The only thing BO has brought to the table is the pace of acceleration of the meltdown and if &lt;i&gt;Cap and Tax&lt;/i&gt; and &lt;i&gt;Government Run Health Care&lt;/i&gt; come to fruition (which I don't think they will) then this country will soon be taking a back seat to the likes of China and India because that is where the capital and jobs will flow.  We'll be longing for a 9.5% unemployment rate in 3-4 years.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;btw, last I checked that little "Community Reinvestment Act" started by Carter, enhanced by Clinton and staunchly defended by the Democrats had a HUUUGGGGEEEE say in the housing elevation and eventual collapse.  That's unless of course you want to "rewrite" Liberal Dems history?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">That's what she said Inc.</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 18 Jul 2009 13:25:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Blog: Orange County Supervisors Fire County Administrator over Wal-Mart | Wal-Mart Watch | Fighting for Wal-Mart Workers | Employee Free Choice Act</title><link>http://walmartwatchblog.disqus.com/blog_orange_county_supervisors_fire_county_administrator_over_wal_mart_wal_mart_watch_fighting_for_w/#comment-12883132</link><description>JaneBDoe, I LOVE Orange county VA.  We visit often to the wine vinyards of Barboursville.  It also clearly gives you a perspective on what it is like to have few shopping choices without the long drive. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;ddrb has no sense of "history" or perspective and I'll bet she has never visited your lovely county or the nearby civil war battlefields.  She's just too bitter still fighting Walmart because she lives with one in her backyard and doesn't know how to get rid of it yet (hmm.. maybe MOVE!)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">That's what she said Inc.</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 18 Jul 2009 13:37:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Blog: Snakebit: A Trip to Wal-Mart May Cost One Man An Arm And $30,000 | Wal-Mart Watch | Fighting for Wal-Mart Workers | Employee Free Choice Act</title><link>http://walmartwatchblog.disqus.com/blog_snakebit_a_trip_to_wal_mart_may_cost_one_man_an_arm_and_30000_wal_mart_watch_fighting_for_wal_m/#comment-12886392</link><description>Holy cow ddrb did you make a find or what in your endless google searches!!!!!  Now please tell me the link you found this at so I can see what you look like.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">That's what she said Inc.</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 18 Jul 2009 15:48:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Blog: Wal-Mart getting it both ways on health care | Wal-Mart Watch | Fighting for Wal-Mart Workers | Employee Free Choice Act</title><link>http://walmartwatchblog.disqus.com/blog_wal_mart_getting_it_both_ways_on_health_care_wal_mart_watch_fighting_for_wal_mart_workers_emplo/#comment-12887771</link><description>Don't need to ddrb, I call it like I see it and it's pretty obvious to me.  Sorry you can't</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">That's what she said Inc.</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 18 Jul 2009 15:52:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Blog: Guest Book Review: To Serve God and Wal-Mart, by Bethany Moreton | Wal-Mart Watch | Fighting for Wal-Mart Workers | Employee Free Choice Act</title><link>http://walmartwatchblog.disqus.com/blog_guest_book_review_to_serve_god_and_wal_mart_by_bethany_moreton_wal_mart_watch_fighting_for_wal_/#comment-12888173</link><description>I'm sorry ddrb you are correct.  Please let me correct my statement.... "The only thing BO has brought to the table is the pace of acceleration of the meltdown and if Cap and Tax and Government Run Health Care come to fruition (which I don't think they will) then this country will soon be taking a back seat to the likes of China and India because that is where the capital and jobs will flow EVEN MORE."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;There.  That's better.  Just taking a bad problem and making it worse.  The only thing is... it's still A PROBLEM.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">That's what she said Inc.</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 18 Jul 2009 15:55:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Blog: Guest Book Review: To Serve God and Wal-Mart, by Bethany Moreton | Wal-Mart Watch | Fighting for Wal-Mart Workers | Employee Free Choice Act</title><link>http://walmartwatchblog.disqus.com/blog_guest_book_review_to_serve_god_and_wal_mart_by_bethany_moreton_wal_mart_watch_fighting_for_wal_/#comment-12888260</link><description>&lt;i&gt;A relatively few people who got loans they shouldn't have to buy houses they couldn't afford &lt;/i&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;A FEW people?  Wow, talk about living in denial.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">That's what she said Inc.</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 18 Jul 2009 15:59:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Blog: Guest Book Review: To Serve God and Wal-Mart, by Bethany Moreton | Wal-Mart Watch | Fighting for Wal-Mart Workers | Employee Free Choice Act</title><link>http://walmartwatchblog.disqus.com/blog_guest_book_review_to_serve_god_and_wal_mart_by_bethany_moreton_wal_mart_watch_fighting_for_wal_/#comment-12918145</link><description>I'm sorry, who made the original statement that "relatively few people who got loans they shouldn't have to buy house they couldn't afford..."?  So why don't you, Mr. Know-It-All, tell us just how many make up the "few" that you talk about?  While your at it let's talk about the leveraging and derivatives which absolutely contributed to the mess, but only after prices started falling... so we're back to the root of why did home prices fall in the first place?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">That's what she said Inc.</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2009 08:39:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A &amp;#8220;juicy&amp;#8221; Silicon Valley startup</title><link>http://scobleizer.disqus.com/a_8220juicy8221_silicon_valley_startup/#comment-9711564</link><description>Sunkist started as fresh fruit, but they have diluted the brand so much with line extension and licensing into candy and crap like that, that I think that the association with all the "fresh and natural" crap that Mark Shaw is talking about is long gone.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">That's what she said Inc.</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2008 21:06:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Spartadata introduces Billing: Credit Card Terminal 1.0 for iPhone</title><link>http://148appsbiz.disqus.com/spartadata_introduces_billing_credit_card_terminal_10_for_iphone/#comment-15033835</link><description>Very nice app</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">That's what she said Inc.</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2009 18:51:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Avatar Artwork Revealed</title><link>http://slashfilm.disqus.com/avatar_artwork_revealed/#comment-11195471</link><description>&lt;p&gt;There is no way that a sci fi film will be able to make Titanic bucks!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">That's what she said Inc.</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2008 19:30:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://templates.joomlart.com/ja_teline_iii/index.php?option=com_content&amp;amp;view=article&amp;amp;id=250:morbi-faucibus-sed-vivamus-odio&amp;amp;catid=93:mother-children&amp;amp;Itemid=451</title><link>http://telineiii101.disqus.com/thread_124/#comment-16283813</link><description>nice</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">That's what she said Inc.</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 21:42:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://disqus.com/preview/</title><link>http://disquspreview.disqus.com/landing_preview/#comment-20787631</link><description>Type your comment here.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">That's what she said Inc.</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 12:02:48 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>