<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for Matt Keegan</title><link>http://disqus.com/people/48c5db2471a1eee0df351d5c4918ec79/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2007 16:59:04 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: MyBlogLog vs Blogcatalog &amp;#8211; Differentiation</title><link>http://andybeard.disqus.com/mybloglog_vs_blogcatalog_8211_differentiation_03/#comment-10990255</link><description>Andy, thank you for the time to show us the differences between the two communities. Admittedly, I am tilted toward MBL at the moment, but this article serves to remind me that BC has some attributes to it worth exploring. I thought I would be more involved with BUMPzee, but StumbleUpon is eating up all of my time!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Matt Keegan</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 26 Jul 2007 15:30:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: MyBlogLog vs Blogcatalog &amp;#8211; Differentiation</title><link>http://andybeard.disqus.com/mybloglog_vs_blogcatalog_8211_differentiation_03/#comment-12524817</link><description>Andy, thank you for the time to show us the differences between the two communities. Admittedly, I am tilted toward MBL at the moment, but this article serves to remind me that BC has some attributes to it worth exploring. I thought I would be more involved with BUMPzee, but StumbleUpon is eating up all of my time!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Matt Keegan</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 26 Jul 2007 15:30:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google Adsense Arbitrage- Finally The Step In the Right Direction</title><link>http://sageblogger.disqus.com/google_adsense_arbitrage_finally_the_step_in_the_right_direction/#comment-1793063</link><description>I am so glad that this isn't only a rumor, but that Google has followed through. The internet is too cluttered with junky sites -- this move is one that should begin to clean everything up.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Matt Keegan</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2007 18:43:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Finds and Links: 07-23-2007</title><link>http://sageblogger.disqus.com/finds_and_links_07_23_2007/#comment-1793379</link><description>I agree that StumbleUpon traffic is superb. While Digg can be worthwhile, successful articles usually mean a surge of traffic that will crash your server. With SU, traffic is spread out over several days and can last for weeks.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Matt Keegan</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2007 18:55:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Blog Contests: Make Them Worthwhile To Participate In</title><link>http://sageblogger.disqus.com/blog_contests_make_them_worthwhile_to_participate_in/#comment-1793367</link><description>I've been contemplating holding a contest too, but I am not sure of what the parameters should be or if my expectations will be in line. Best wishes with your contest -- you have to start somewhere!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Matt Keegan</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2007 18:57:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Technorati Punishes Me For Too Many Favorites</title><link>http://sageblogger.disqus.com/technorati_punishes_me_for_too_many_favorites/#comment-1793327</link><description>I haven't paid all that much attention to Technorati ever since they changed things with their "favs" category. I guess Technorati has become so easy to game that they felt that they needed to make the change.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Matt Keegan</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2007 18:59:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: What Would You Do With $200?</title><link>http://sageblogger.disqus.com/what_would_you_do_with_200/#comment-1793258</link><description>Did I win? Nice contest -- I hope it brings a boatload of traffic to your site.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Matt Keegan</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2007 19:29:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Content Spooling Network Review: The 21 Day Trial</title><link>http://sageblogger.disqus.com/content_spooling_network_review_the_21_day_trial/#comment-1794100</link><description>CSN could work for writers struggling with producing compelling copy, but I'd be interested in reading how that final copy reads.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Some of the rewritten stuff I have found around the internet is dull and unconvincing as the writer's lack of subject knowledge (or care to write properly) is evident.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Hopefully, you'll find CSN to work otherwise -- best wishes for a successful test run.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Matt Keegan</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2007 16:59:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Month of Madness: Will I Make $1,300 in One Month with Paid Reviews?</title><link>http://volodymyrzablotskyy.disqus.com/month_of_madness_will_i_make_1300_in_one_month_with_paid_reviews/#comment-1621767</link><description>Vlad, I am sorry that I did not respond to your message earlier. Thank you for the mention too.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Yes, in April 2007 I made something like $1304 from PayPerPost. At that time I was managing eight blogs and posting ads regularly to seven of them. My main blog I kept relatively ad free, choosing only to go with the occasional high paying ad once in awhile.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Since that time I sold off two blogs and closed down four other blogs so I am left with only two blogs, both occupying the same URL. PPP has changed a lot since that time in that the quality of ads seems to have dropped. So, I doubt that I'll ever make more than $100 in any given month unless someone agrees to pay the $99 charge I have on my The Article Writer blog.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;On the other hand, I pulled in $43 last month from  Text Link Ads. Not bad, eh?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Matt Keegan</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 05 Jul 2007 09:42:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google Adsense Arbitrage- Finally The Step In the Right Direction</title><link>http://volodymyrzablotskyy.disqus.com/google_adsense_arbitrage_finally_the_step_in_the_right_direction_81/#comment-1621727</link><description>I am so glad that this isn't only a rumor, but that Google has followed through. The internet is too cluttered with junky sites -- this move is one that should begin to clean everything up.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Matt Keegan</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2007 18:43:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Finds and Links: 07-23-2007</title><link>http://volodymyrzablotskyy.disqus.com/finds_and_links_07_23_2007/#comment-1622126</link><description>I agree that StumbleUpon traffic is superb. While Digg can be worthwhile, successful articles usually mean a surge of traffic that will crash your server. With SU, traffic is spread out over several days and can last for weeks.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Matt Keegan</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2007 18:55:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Blog Contests: Make Them Worthwhile To Participate In</title><link>http://volodymyrzablotskyy.disqus.com/blog_contests_make_them_worthwhile_to_participate_in/#comment-1622107</link><description>I've been contemplating holding a contest too, but I am not sure of what the parameters should be or if my expectations will be in line. Best wishes with your contest -- you have to start somewhere!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Matt Keegan</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2007 18:57:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Technorati Punishes Me For Too Many Favorites</title><link>http://volodymyrzablotskyy.disqus.com/technorati_punishes_me_for_too_many_favorites/#comment-1622061</link><description>I haven't paid all that much attention to Technorati ever since they changed things with their "favs" category. I guess Technorati has become so easy to game that they felt that they needed to make the change.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Matt Keegan</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2007 18:59:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: What Would You Do With $200?</title><link>http://volodymyrzablotskyy.disqus.com/what_would_you_do_with_200/#comment-1621973</link><description>Did I win? Nice contest -- I hope it brings a boatload of traffic to your site.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Matt Keegan</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2007 19:29:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Content Spooling Network Review: The 21 Day Trial</title><link>http://volodymyrzablotskyy.disqus.com/content_spooling_network_review_the_21_day_trial/#comment-1622752</link><description>CSN could work for writers struggling with producing compelling copy, but I'd be interested in reading how that final copy reads. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Some of the rewritten stuff I have found around the internet is dull and unconvincing as the writer's lack of subject knowledge (or care to write properly) is evident.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Hopefully, you'll find CSN to work otherwise -- best wishes for a successful test run.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Matt Keegan</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2007 16:59:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How to Use StumbleUpon to Promote</title><link>http://davidrisley.disqus.com/how_to_use_stumbleupon_to_promote/#comment-1173068</link><description>StumbleUpon is awesome! I typically get more than half of my daily traffic from SU, sometimes a lot more. Some of my visitors stop long enough to leave a comment on my blog, read an article, or contact me for more information.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Because SU is so valuable, I purposely stumble as many pages as possible for each of my mutual friends. Together, I am sure we do a great job of helping each other out.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Matt Keegan</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2007 15:51:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How To Write Eye-Popping Headlines While Exhausted</title><link>http://instigatorblog.disqus.com/how_to_write_eye_popping_headlines_while_exhausted/#comment-1648093</link><description>Man! So little sleep! This too shall pass or have another baby to double your pleasure.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;When I am sleep deprived, coffee is my best friend. Once I have a jolt, I can write but I do "sound" as if I am ADHD!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Matt Keegan</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 06 Jul 2007 16:51:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Wikipedia&amp;#8217;s Jimmy Wales Wants to Have His Cake and Eat it too!</title><link>http://marketingpilgrim.disqus.com/wikipedia8217s_jimmy_wales_wants_to_have_his_cake_and_eat_it_too/#comment-9416753</link><description>As Dr. Hill mentions, Wikipedia has flaws but so does the Encyclopedia Britannica at least according to &lt;a href="http://news.com.com/Study+Wikipedia+as+accurate+as+Britannica/2100-1038_3-5997332.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;a study&lt;/a&gt; comparing the reliability (or accuracy) of the two. As far as Search Wikia goes, he'll have to do a lot to make the site relevant -- the search engine shake out indicates that the strong are already on top and improving all of the time.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Matt Keegan</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 04 Aug 2007 15:37:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Eyetracking Shows Web Audience Ignores Ads</title><link>http://marketingpilgrim.disqus.com/eyetracking_shows_web_audience_ignores_ads/#comment-9417753</link><description>This news isn't surprising. Long ago I quit clicking on ads and I recently removed AdSense from my flagship blog as the annoyance didn't justify the few bucks that I made.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Content is king and bloggers/web site owners need to find different ways to monetize their sites. Personally, I am tired of some of the more spammy looking site out there -- too many widgets, chicklets, and ads to to get through in order to read the content.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Matt Keegan</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Aug 2007 18:36:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: BlogRush, You&amp;#8217;re Kidding Me</title><link>http://techipedia.disqus.com/blogrush_you8217re_kidding_me/#comment-14968557</link><description>BlogRush is overblown. I got suspicious of it when all of these Sphinn posts appeared giving it a positive spin -- I couldn't see how it could possibly receive such good press, being so new.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;You have confirmed my suspicions!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Matt Keegan</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2007 18:02:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Top SEO Blogs by Link Popularity</title><link>http://toprankblog.disqus.com/top_seo_blogs_by_link_popularity/#comment-17129033</link><description>Amazing numbers, indeed! I guess I'll have to work on raising my 12K score a bit, maybe doubling it over the next year or so.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Matt Keegan</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 10 Jul 2007 07:41:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Nonprofits in Need of Search Marketing</title><link>http://toprankblog.disqus.com/nonprofits_in_need_of_search_marketing/#comment-17130632</link><description>I like the idea that people remember to help organizations that do not have the means to pay for marketing campaigns. Even if we cannot offer full scale support, stumbling and bookmarking nonprofit pages is a good start. Offering free links on select pages is another small, but important gesture.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Matt Keegan</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2007 06:45:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: More on Business 2.0 Closure: Internal Memo; 18 Job Losses</title><link>http://paidcontent.disqus.com/more_on_business_20_closure_internal_memo_18_job_losses/#comment-18823680</link><description>I was wondering if Business 2.0 would be folded into Fortune and you have answered that question. Still, it is too bad that the magazine couldn&amp;#39;t have been kept independent.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Matt Keegan</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2007 15:14:42 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>