<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for Chas</title><link>http://disqus.com/people/4772445135993caf0f1e16bc7c8c1a6f/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2009 16:49:00 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Help Cindy Crawford and be a winner!!!! Keep it PUR contest!</title><link>http://greenandcleanmom.disqus.com/help_cindy_crawford_and_be_a_winner_keep_it_pur_contest/#comment-22146447</link><description>LOL with Cindy, but I'd love the prize.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Chas</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 11 May 2008 18:52:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://michellesfamilyjournal.blogspot.com/2008/01/blog-carnival-giveaway.html</title><link>http://michellesfamilylife.disqus.com/httpmichellesfamilyjournalblogspotcom200801blog_carnival_giveawayhtml/#comment-22018546</link><description>Someone was just raving about Deceptively Delicious! I'd love to use that book.  Not only does my daughter need to be tricked into eating healthy...so does my &amp;lt;a href="mailto:husband!!&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;chas779@gmail.com"&amp;gt;husband!!&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;chas779@gmail.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Chas</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 22:48:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: UpsideTrader</title><link>http://upsidetrader.disqus.com/upsidetrader_4382/#comment-7276728</link><description>love the ice age article... i guess all the greenhouse gasses fixed the problem for us</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Chas</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2009 16:49:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: OhGizmo!  &amp;raquo; Archive  &amp;raquo; Dyson Contrarotator Washing Machine</title><link>http://ohgizmo.disqus.com/ohgizmo_raquo_archive_raquo_dyson_contrarotator_washing_machine/#comment-1759544</link><description>Wouldn't this just twist/tangle the clothes especially if you overload the machine?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Chas</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 04 Oct 2006 22:23:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: OhGizmo!  &amp;raquo; Archive  &amp;raquo; Pubic Hair Dye, By Betty Beauty</title><link>http://ohgizmo.disqus.com/ohgizmo_raquo_archive_raquo_pubic_hair_dye_by_betty_beauty/#comment-1759868</link><description>That's nothing, "merkins" which are pubic wigs have been around for centuries. &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Merkin" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Merkin&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://www.merkinworld.com/" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.merkinworld.com/&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Modern versions ( &lt;a href="http://www.merkinworld.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.merkinworld.com&lt;/a&gt; ) seem to still be used by strippers in areas where they are not allowed to show the "full monty", as part of the fetish scene, or for flashing from under a miniskirts in nightclubs in cities where public nudity is more tolerated.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Chas</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 31 Oct 2006 09:37:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Jesus the Musical by Javier Prato</title><link>http://onejerusalem.disqus.com/jesus_the_musical_by_javier_prato/#comment-2559563</link><description>OK - so look at his shadow just before he gets 'hit' - spooky bus doesn't have a shadow!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Very clever - Happy Easter - Christ is Risen - He is Risen Indeed!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Chas</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 16 Apr 2006 16:23:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://blog.inc.com/archives/2004/11/the_apprentice_11.html</title><link>http://inc.disqus.com/httpbloginccomarchives200411the_apprentice_11html/#comment-16446636</link><description>Chris was fired, and rightly so. There isn't much to add to this. No one in the group has anything to offer...well, I suppose I'd like to see Jennifer's rack, but that's all I see she has to offer. It's really boring and I think I'm going to start watching the recaps and skip the show.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Chas</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 12 Nov 2004 11:07:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://blog.inc.com/archives/2004/11/the_apprentice_11.html</title><link>http://inc.disqus.com/httpbloginccomarchives200411the_apprentice_11html/#comment-16446646</link><description>I just watched "my big fat boss" just because it was a parody. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;It was not funny, and at no time held my interest. I'm a bit harder to fool and I can't believe that these people are not suspecting candid camera.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Chas</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 15 Nov 2004 11:08:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://blog.inc.com/archives/2004/11/the_apprentice_11.html</title><link>http://inc.disqus.com/httpbloginccomarchives200411the_apprentice_11html/#comment-16446650</link><description>Reggie,&lt;br  /&gt;that's pretty much my point.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;In this day and age, with all the crap on TV; the hoax shows, the practical jokes, fake weddings, scams, candid camera type shows, you been "punked"; I can't believe that these morons can go as long as they do without suspecting a scam. The look on their faces indicate that they can not believe what they are hearing/seeing. How can one of them not jump up and say, "I think this is a joke."&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I mean, Even I won't fall for a fake lottery ticket when my friends give me one......</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Chas</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 16 Nov 2004 07:43:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://blog.inc.com/archives/2004/11/the_apprentice_11.html</title><link>http://inc.disqus.com/httpbloginccomarchives200411the_apprentice_11html/#comment-16446655</link><description>Ivanna took three people into the board room.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Chas</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 18 Nov 2004 05:31:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://blog.inc.com/archives/2004/12/the_apprentice_13.html</title><link>http://inc.disqus.com/httpbloginccomarchives200412the_apprentice_13html/#comment-16446716</link><description>I suppose the only comment I have to add is my complete surprise at Ivana's immaturity. When I watched her chase down the twins, and then insert herself into their sale, I was just shocked. I didn't even hear what she said because I was too busy gasping for air. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Look, I've never been an Ivana fan, but I never found her quite as distasteful as that episode. I think that the entire team made a horrible decision to waste time walking over to find the girls, then walking around trying to figure out what to do. I can only imagine that they must have been out of candy bars, because they should have strategized on how to increase sales. They must have been done selling at that point. There are just so many more things they could have done without showing everyone Ivana's poor taste in undies.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Chas</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 07 Dec 2004 12:06:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://blog.inc.com/archives/2004/11/the_apprentice_10.html</title><link>http://inc.disqus.com/httpbloginccomarchives200411the_apprentice_10html/#comment-16447938</link><description>I didn't care much about anything except finally seeing Raj get what's comming to him. Finally I got to hoop and holler and cheer at those fantastic words..."Raj, you're fired!" YEEEEhaw! How I grew to hate him after he sang his little German song during Elizabeth's chat. Man he is an asshole.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Jennifer: Who let the snake out? I didn't know she was going to turn into such an unprofessional witch. Clearly Raj was at odds with her about knocking down that wall; as if it only takes sledge hammer. Had Roj listened to her and put more effort into that bathroom instead of being an arrogant idiot, they would have won, regardless of the contractor. So why did she concentrate on Ivanna so much? Clearly, with Roj gone her chances of success are much better, sh'e not thinking to clearly.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Carolyn: What a little lap dog...DT says he dislikes hearing about poor team performance and she starts biting like a yappy little attack poodle... If this woman has her head up any further, she's gonna start being classified as a tape worm. I swear, if she ever looked at me with that snotty tone, and snapped like that, I'd have to bust out laughing, boss or not... She reminded me of my snotty little sister.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;DT should have pulled another fast one, fired both Roj and Ivanna, and then let crazy Stacy back in, that would have been fun.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Chas</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 05 Nov 2004 09:26:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://blog.inc.com/archives/2004/11/the_apprentice_10.html</title><link>http://inc.disqus.com/httpbloginccomarchives200411the_apprentice_10html/#comment-16447940</link><description>Oh yeah, poor Andy....does he realize that he had the Mob do him a favor....think those guys ever forget that???</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Chas</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 05 Nov 2004 09:28:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://blog.inc.com/archives/2004/11/the_apprentice_10.html</title><link>http://inc.disqus.com/httpbloginccomarchives200411the_apprentice_10html/#comment-16447943</link><description>Unfortunately, both observers saw that Ivanna was working her butt off and clearly did not belong in the board room on this particular task. The fact that jennifer plotted against her and clarified her reasoning for being a witch, does not make her any less so. You comments about her sticking her neck out make no sense at all. She argued with Roj about 4 bedrooms, and was right. The fact that they lost because she couldn't convince Roj to keep it 4 bedrooms makes me wonder about her judgement. I used to like her a lot, but now I see her as a snake; slithering around and trying to get ahead by stepping on others instead of flying above the. She will never make it to the end, she is a witch.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Chas</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 05 Nov 2004 10:52:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://blog.inc.com/archives/2004/11/the_apprentice_10.html</title><link>http://inc.disqus.com/httpbloginccomarchives200411the_apprentice_10html/#comment-16447944</link><description>there is a little extra footage here:&lt;br  /&gt;&lt;a href="http://apprentice.tv.yahoo.com/" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://apprentice.tv.yahoo.com/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Watch the witch...... Roj deserved to get fired, he destroyed the commercial and the house, how can anyone see him as an asset???&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Maybe she's just a stupid witch... Pretty, but a stupid witch? &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Well, not stupid, she is groomed well....maybe just a bad judge of character.... a poor judgement witch...</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Chas</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 05 Nov 2004 11:04:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://blog.inc.com/archives/2004/11/the_apprentice_10.html</title><link>http://inc.disqus.com/httpbloginccomarchives200411the_apprentice_10html/#comment-16447960</link><description>Raj has a website: typical raj too, he starts out with a pompus excuse why the website isn't finished, imagine that. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The more I learn about him, the more I dislike him. He tries so had to be different it makes me wonder who he really is. He is a pompus ass that should have been fired long ago. He interfered in the modeling segment; making an ass out of himself and getting in the way. Then he personally destroyed the NYPD commercial. Then, as a project manager, he displayed what an incompetent fool he really is... I loved watching him scramble around trying to cover his ass in a half assed way. It is very humorous listeneing to people talk about his ability to stand up and admit he made a mistake... perhaps because it is so obvoius that he made so many, he had no choice. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Jennifer C. also has a website, in it she offers her services. It's pretty funny to think that a loser fired twice is offering speaking engagements...what will she talk about, Jewish Women??</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Chas</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 11 Nov 2004 04:20:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://blog.inc.com/archives/2004/12/the_apprentice_15.html</title><link>http://inc.disqus.com/httpbloginccomarchives200412the_apprentice_15html/#comment-16448855</link><description>When I consider the embarrising tongue thrashing Jen gave other contestants, I think her treatment was justly served. She did absolutely nothing, flew under the radar and then manipulated her way out of the board room. When she finally did do something, it was to lambaste the other people, good people like Sandy and Andy. She was a nasty mean manupulative bitch. I think she got what she deserved, I just wish it happened sooner...</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Chas</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 17 Dec 2004 12:16:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://blog.inc.com/archives/2004/12/the_apprentice_15.html</title><link>http://inc.disqus.com/httpbloginccomarchives200412the_apprentice_15html/#comment-16448866</link><description>Kreplach: You raise an excellent and *urgent* point about your comprehension skills. you *do* need to learn how to express yourself better, or else you will never become a success in life. Those fancy Harvard and Princeton degrees clearly mean nothing. All the success you have had thus far *must* have been dumb luck. If you persists in making minor comprehension errors of the type you describe, you will eventually be found out for what you are. Who cares, after all, that you creamed the wrong guy if, as you so devastatingly point out, you cannot differentiate between Connan and Kevin. Clearly, reading names is more important than actually earning the honor! Thank God there are vigilant, intelligent viewers of reality recap forums like yourself to bring everyone to account. (I was particularly impressed with your mastery of the rules for the incredibly stupid mistake.) Now, how do we get your vital message to the right guy? Perhaps you could telephone him. You twit.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;br  /&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Chas</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 20 Dec 2004 04:43:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://blog.inc.com/archives/2004/12/the_apprentice_15.html</title><link>http://inc.disqus.com/httpbloginccomarchives200412the_apprentice_15html/#comment-16448869</link><description>"Thus the fact that Jennifer made negative comments about othe candidates should not be used as a yardstick for how she should be treated."&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;yeah, right..... She walked around the suite and conspired against other players; forming alliances and trashing people behind their backs. She laid plans to "go after" people, she attacked like a pit bull. She eaves dropped on Kelly, and as he was doing the same thing she did, she accused him of having no "integrity".&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Jen got what she deserved, she acted like a snake on TV, and was treated like one on TV.... she reaped what she sow...&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;What comes around goes around...</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Chas</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 20 Dec 2004 12:32:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://blog.inc.com/archives/2004/12/the_apprentice_15.html</title><link>http://inc.disqus.com/httpbloginccomarchives200412the_apprentice_15html/#comment-16448876</link><description>Caroline DID bring up the fact that Kelly claimed to wash more dogs..... but Jen's idea stealing never made it into the board room; that was what the poster meant.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Jen was worthless, she tried to rise to the top by stepping on people...we all know you have to learn to fly to get to the top, and you have to do it without stepping on people.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Chas</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 21 Dec 2004 11:38:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://blog.inc.com/archives/2004/12/the_apprentice_15.html</title><link>http://inc.disqus.com/httpbloginccomarchives200412the_apprentice_15html/#comment-16448878</link><description>Staci,&lt;br  /&gt;You sound angry; you are also yelling.... are you ok?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Yes, I am a lot of fun, come on over and hang with us. Thanks for noticing.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Chas</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 22 Dec 2004 04:20:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://blog.inc.com/archives/2004/10/the_apprentice_7.html</title><link>http://inc.disqus.com/httpbloginccomarchives200410the_apprentice_7html/#comment-16448948</link><description>I must be missing something, because the guys designs were ugly as hell, except for maybe one. I don't think this was a pricing only error. Clearly, the buyers have to weigh the designs with the price. Only attractive designs coupled with low prices will beat out ugly designs with high prices at such a high difference. The women had classy material with tasteful designs, the men had hidious outfits; only one was ogled at.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;John was the obvoius choice for firing. I don't think the pricing hurt the men as much as the poor designs and lack of leadership. Donny can't fire two people, and what a moron for only bringing in two people, DT already showed he does the unpredicatble.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Oh yeah, I saw that rack on half pint... I saw it one before on a scene in the suite.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I still say it will be down to Kelly and Jennifer.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I found a site last week with extra footage videos. I watched the men convince the girls to get rid of Pamela. I hear those board rooms can go five hours and we only see ten minutes.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Chas</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 18 Oct 2004 04:16:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://blog.inc.com/archives/2004/10/the_apprentice_7.html</title><link>http://inc.disqus.com/httpbloginccomarchives200410the_apprentice_7html/#comment-16448961</link><description>I just went back and looked at the videos again. I suppose the men did have some OK looking designs. Seeing it all again they didn't look so bad but the resolution on the video is not as good as my TV at home... because I remeber some of the material looking real hideous. So maybe price played a larger role than I first thought. the women had a more conservative design, I think. But there had to be more than price issues; they won by 3X! &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;It was worth seeing Jen lean over again.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Chas</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 19 Oct 2004 08:47:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://blog.inc.com/archives/2004/12/the_apprentice_14.html</title><link>http://inc.disqus.com/httpbloginccomarchives200412the_apprentice_14html/#comment-16449158</link><description>I feel like the whole show has been ruined by the earlier reports about the winner leak. A month or so ago it was reported in the news that bookies have stopeed taking bets on season 2 apprentice. It was leaked out that Jen and Kelly were the final two, and the winner was Kelly.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Chas</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 10 Dec 2004 09:20:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://blog.inc.com/archives/2004/12/the_apprentice_14.html</title><link>http://inc.disqus.com/httpbloginccomarchives200412the_apprentice_14html/#comment-16449160</link><description>I was interrupted and couldn't finish my first post...anyhow,&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Now that Jenn and Kelly are the final two, it looks like the bookie reports are on the money, and knowing this ruins the outcome for me.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I remember Raj and Kelly going at it during the fashion show; I'm not surprised at Raj's attitude. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I thought the cat fight at the board room was just hilarious. Jenn is a very crafty strategist, and as much as I dislike her tactics, one must admit that she is a very effective strategist. She knows all the right moves, all the right phrases and these serve her well for covering up her incompetence. It's obvius that she is a classic "copy cat". I doubt she could do anything creative. She walks through life according to an instruction manual, a robot...a fembot....</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Chas</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 10 Dec 2004 09:41:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://blog.inc.com/archives/2005/03/the_mba_program.html</title><link>http://inc.disqus.com/httpbloginccomarchives200503the_mba_programhtml/#comment-16449310</link><description>I have a MBA, and I have yet to see any credible evidence that a person's education correlates to their ethical standards. I defy anyone on this board to provide the statistical evidence that proves this either way.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The argument about health insurance is also void of credible evidence. Throwing out the “44 million uninsured” is a Liberal blanket statement, and I think Tom and MBA did a better job analyzing the data. I am a technologist; one thing I do well is to look at “why” the numbers are as they are. I would think that someone with a PhD would be able to verify numbers and identify outliers. (No offense bud, but you really have not supported your numbers at all)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Regardless, having a MBA is irrelevant to the health care crisis, the issues go far beyond just the “44 million” as you must ask, and then ANSWER: why are the numbers so high?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I find that the Liberals use these numbers as a political war cry, and ignore the real statistics. They don't support tort reform, which is ONE of the many reasons health care costs are so high; so how can they be taken seriously? Having a MBA has nothing to do with this. The lawyers, as in Trial Law, make more money from lawsuits than Microsoft, Cisco, and they make twice as much money as Coca Cola. So whine about high healthcare costs, use this myopic 44 Million, and then DON'T support tort reform???? That is not the fault of the MBA.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Yes, China has a serious problem with illegal manufacturing and intellectual property infringement. But the MBA is not to blame for this, the criminals are. Yes, GM is the only one that has taken a chance on marketing cars in China, but it HAS paid off; regardless of the imitation products. No one can prove that GM is NOT making money from Buick in China.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Having an education has nothing to do with ethical standards. That's like saying it is the PhD's fault that the ORings failed on the shuttle or the insulation was the result of having an engineering degree. Come on, get real people.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Oh, since people use side notes here...how come some one with a PHD [sic] does not even know how to abbreviate his own credentials?????&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;br  /&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Chas</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 10 Mar 2005 06:04:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://blog.inc.com/archives/2004/12/miss_management_10.html</title><link>http://inc.disqus.com/httpbloginccomarchives200412miss_management_10html/#comment-16449668</link><description>That was great...post it again!?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Chas</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 07 Dec 2004 11:14:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://blog.inc.com/archives/2005/03/the_apprentice_18.html</title><link>http://inc.disqus.com/httpbloginccomarchives200503the_apprentice_18html/#comment-16449829</link><description>My GOD was that woman full of herself. I'm amazed she thought she was as word crafty as she did. I remember when Erin crumbled in front of the pissed off Actor during the comercial segment. She proved right there that she didn't know how to handle anything that didn't require her looks....which I didn't find all that great.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The office was un-watchable. I hope it's dropped soon, it's horrible.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Chas</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 28 Mar 2005 12:48:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://blog.inc.com/archives/2005/03/the_apprentice_18.html</title><link>http://inc.disqus.com/httpbloginccomarchives200503the_apprentice_18html/#comment-16449832</link><description>My daughter laughed so hard when she saw Erin's pink suitcase....She called it a Barbie suitcase.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Chas</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 30 Mar 2005 04:46:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://blog.inc.com/archives/2005/03/the_apprentice_18.html</title><link>http://inc.disqus.com/httpbloginccomarchives200503the_apprentice_18html/#comment-16449836</link><description>I think one of the best business rules is to have updated websites in a timely manner. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I like the Business Rules posted by the Donald Trump Apprentice, but it's never updated on time.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Chas</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 04 Apr 2005 05:39:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://blog.inc.com/archives/2004/11/the_apprentice_12.html</title><link>http://inc.disqus.com/httpbloginccomarchives200411the_apprentice_12html/#comment-16450317</link><description>I'm amazed an Jennifer; she looked so good at the beginning, I thought for sure she and Kelly would end up as the final two. But now I see her for the backstabbing, coasting little witch she is.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I think Kevin is the only personable one right now. Kelly is maintaing a credible showing, but losing ground as a respectable leader.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I still think that Andy takes a lot of flack. He may not contribute as much as he could, but he is still under the direction of a PM and must do as told. DT is inconsistant in his expectations when it comes to speaking out, speaking up, taking control and leading.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Oh how embarassed I am for DT's little lap dog. She bites when told, yaps on cue and is such an obvious butt kissing lackey. How I'd like to slap that nasty look off her face.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I'm surprised Wes got this far, but he seemed to fly under the radar screen for a long time, he is basically a vanilla cookie.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I can't wait for Jenn to get it, I hope she is next to get fired, I hope DT finally calls her out for the phony witch she is.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;If only Ivanna was not so mean, she could be good if she would just control her nasty remarks.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Chas</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 19 Nov 2004 09:59:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://blog.inc.com/archives/2004/11/the_apprentice_12.html</title><link>http://inc.disqus.com/httpbloginccomarchives200411the_apprentice_12html/#comment-16450320</link><description>Who came up with that name "schozophrenic blink monkey"? I LOVE it. I used it last night watching the show.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Chas</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 19 Nov 2004 10:03:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://blog.inc.com/archives/2004/11/the_apprentice_12.html</title><link>http://inc.disqus.com/httpbloginccomarchives200411the_apprentice_12html/#comment-16450325</link><description>Conan,&lt;br  /&gt;Good going, you get an exemption for any predictions you make on this board that do not come true. Don't be a Bradford and squander the opportunity.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Seriously, I laugh everytime I see her and I think about it, nice job. It has a good ring to it, doncha think?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Schizophrenic blink monkey, I was going to Email it to Maria, but that would be mean.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I like saying it...schizophrenic blink monkey</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Chas</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 19 Nov 2004 12:05:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://blog.inc.com/archives/2004/12/can_you_take_a.html</title><link>http://inc.disqus.com/httpbloginccomarchives200412can_you_take_ahtml/#comment-16450647</link><description>We don't give sick days. If you are sick, you take a vacation day. If you don't have any vacation days left, you loose the days pay. It sounds unfair, but we have too many idiots with the "Alex" mentality. You know, people that think it's ok to steal the company's money by calling in sick and getting paid to take a holiday. I wonder how these idiots would feel if the company decided not to pay them for a day....just because they didn't feel like it.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Sick days and vacation days are not mandated by law. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Fortunately, My job does not suck.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Chas</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 01 Dec 2004 10:19:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://blog.inc.com/archives/2005/01/the_apprentice_16.html</title><link>http://inc.disqus.com/httpbloginccomarchives200501the_apprentice_16html/#comment-16450863</link><description>I thought it looked like a Jerry Springer episode</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Chas</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 28 Jan 2005 09:32:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://blog.inc.com/archives/2005/04/the_apprentice_21.html</title><link>http://inc.disqus.com/httpbloginccomarchives200504the_apprentice_21html/#comment-16451004</link><description>As a man of few words:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Bren is boring and sloppy; a disasterous combination. I keep waiting for his hair to go up in flames everytime he lights up.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Craig is a slug. He does not earn any more respect than he gives. His "boxed" personality serves only his low self esteem.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Tana just lost all my respect. Give her a better face and some bigger boobs, and the "Fembot" is born again.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Craig is Craig; nuff said, chew on that.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Alex...uh... Alex who?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Kendra did what she had to do to win, she didn't quit. She's earned the respect for this week.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Chas</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 15 Apr 2005 07:41:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://blog.inc.com/archives/2005/04/the_apprentice_21.html</title><link>http://inc.disqus.com/httpbloginccomarchives200504the_apprentice_21html/#comment-16451008</link><description>There is a difference between a car in motion and an out of focus picture; but it's still pretty funny. Maybe that's what craig was really mad about at the casino.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Chas</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 15 Apr 2005 08:30:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://blog.inc.com/archives/2005/04/the_apprentice_21.html</title><link>http://inc.disqus.com/httpbloginccomarchives200504the_apprentice_21html/#comment-16451009</link><description>Another thing that always bothered me about Craig, and even some of these other "self made" millionares. Craig started with a successful family business. Without his daddy, we would be flippin burgers.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Chas</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 15 Apr 2005 08:31:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://blog.inc.com/archives/2005/04/the_apprentice_21.html</title><link>http://inc.disqus.com/httpbloginccomarchives200504the_apprentice_21html/#comment-16451013</link><description>opps, craig=chris in my last post..</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Chas</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 15 Apr 2005 08:51:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://blog.inc.com/archives/2005/03/the_donald_week_3.html</title><link>http://inc.disqus.com/httpbloginccomarchives200503the_donald_week_3html/#comment-16451262</link><description>the thing that turned me off about John was his comment on the first episode. He didn't want to be referred to as the "non-degree" group. Instead, he chose to rub in the fact that they were "wealthy". This arrogance turned me off, but I still liked the way he handled conflict; that is, with a cool head and low tone. His comment about Audrey being a 22-year-old girl, although correct, would have been better taken had he just pointed out her immaturity; Because that's what she is.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Audrey's "poor me" card was probably her undoing. Nothing I hate more than someone complaining about being beautiful. It reminds me of an executive walking by a janitor and commenting "gee, I wish I had your job, no stress." She was about as self centered as one can be. Her management style was non existant, it's no wonder she's in real estate; where you don't have to interact much with co-workers; just flash that pretty smile at the customers. Notice how she detests being considered pretty, yet she is quite impressed or pleased that DT thought she was...&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I have no idea who is going to win this year, i don't much care either. To me, this is still a Jerry Springer show.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I don't think I'd hire someone in an executive role unless they cut their hair properly (Bren) and get rid of the tri-color hair (chain smoking gym club owner): Tobacco dip has a real problem with his image: I don't see anyone on net-worth that is worth this job. &lt;br  /&gt;Street smarts only gets you buy on the street.&lt;br  /&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Chas</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 09 Mar 2005 07:53:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://blog.inc.com/archives/2005/05/the_apprentice_24.html</title><link>http://inc.disqus.com/httpbloginccomarchives200505the_apprentice_24html/#comment-16451362</link><description>I can't help but to keep thinking that The Sony Playstations that were put in the basement were intended to be the machines that the Games from EA were played on. I think Electronic Arts is just a software company, why would they get "exclusive" rights to the ballroom when they don't make gaming machines?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I think Kendra does not know what she is doing.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Chas</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 09 May 2005 10:44:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://blog.inc.com/archives/2005/05/the_apprentice_24.html</title><link>http://inc.disqus.com/httpbloginccomarchives200505the_apprentice_24html/#comment-16451370</link><description>John was a total tool. &lt;br  /&gt;I think he was getting worse as the time went on because he was "freaking out" from not playing his drums for so long. Something like that can really affect your rational thought process. You need to keep a chain wallet in your pocket to remind you just how cool you are when your'e taken out of such a hip element and thrown in with such square people. I mean... college grads? ewwwww.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I hear he hired Van Halen to play at his birthday party... man, how cool is that. I hope they play "smokin in the boys room."</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Chas</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 12 May 2005 13:53:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://blog.inc.com/archives/2005/05/the_apprentice_25.html</title><link>http://inc.disqus.com/httpbloginccomarchives200505the_apprentice_25html/#comment-16451751</link><description>Michael won a task as project manager, then, on the next task, he brought up some real stupid idea. When the teamates told him his idea was no good, he pushed it. Then he turned into a huge baby and basically quit. He rode his exempt status the whole time, and then they tried to fire him anyway. They (Danny) actually brought Michael into the board room while he was exempt, because they felt so strongly about having him fired.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;He never improved. He chose to be a baby from there on and got fired soon after.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Chas</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 19 May 2005 13:17:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://blog.inc.com/archives/2005/05/the_apprentice_25.html</title><link>http://inc.disqus.com/httpbloginccomarchives200505the_apprentice_25html/#comment-16451752</link><description>you can recap here:&lt;br  /&gt;&lt;a href="http://apprentice.tv.yahoo.com/03/index.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://apprentice.tv.yahoo.com/03/index.html&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Chas</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 19 May 2005 13:18:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://blog.inc.com/archives/2005/03/the_donald_week_5.html</title><link>http://inc.disqus.com/httpbloginccomarchives200503the_donald_week_5html/#comment-16452090</link><description>What a rip off. I'm so sick of re runs. They get us hooked on Desperate housewives; reruns...then Joey; reruns...now this.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;It would be OK if the season was over, and we had a whole episode of things we never seen, but last night was a rip off.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Chas</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 18 Mar 2005 11:40:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://blog.inc.com/archives/2004/12/ken_jennings_th.html</title><link>http://inc.disqus.com/httpbloginccomarchives200412ken_jennings_thhtml/#comment-16452372</link><description>Sheeze Alex, then don't comment on it.... the rest of us would like to discuss it so you are excused, please leave the room.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I don't think Ken quit, I think he finally lost. he said he missed it greatly. No one can go on forever at a game. He said that there were many times when it came down to one question, win or loose so I don't agree with you, I think he lost.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Chas</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 01 Dec 2004 09:52:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://blog.inc.com/archives/2004/10/the_apprentice_9.html</title><link>http://inc.disqus.com/httpbloginccomarchives200410the_apprentice_9html/#comment-16452400</link><description>Wow, Roj sure displayed what an unprofessional jerk he can be. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;This whole thing is starting to get a bit boring. I think Donny should do some mass firing, and get rid of the obvious losers; such as Roj, Wes, Maria and maybe Ivanna. None of these people are going to go much farther and are just dragging this show to boredom. In fact, he should just fire everyon except for four of them, leave in Kelly and Jennifer, pick another male and a female, and do three more episodes.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Chas</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 29 Oct 2004 10:59:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://blog.inc.com/archives/2005/03/the_donald_week_4.html</title><link>http://inc.disqus.com/httpbloginccomarchives200503the_donald_week_4html/#comment-16452968</link><description>bart, you crack me up...&lt;br  /&gt;I agree that John was on the chopping block mainly becuase he was so close to loosing it last week. I was so embarassed for the girls after he offered to play the drums for one band, and then pulled out his "I'm such a Kiss fan" routine. Was he even old enough to listen to music when Kiss was hot? I broke all my Kiss records in the 80s. My god he was bad. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Chris is next to go. He yells too much and too fast.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Chas</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 11 Mar 2005 08:29:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Cutting Your Paper Footprint</title><link>http://treehuggercomments.disqus.com/cutting_your_paper_footprint/#comment-17572061</link><description>&lt;p&gt;there is a great website (which I heard about here)&lt;br  /&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.catalogchoice.org/%3Cbr" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.catalogchoice.org/&amp;lt;br&lt;/a&gt;  /&amp;gt;&lt;br&gt;use this to cancel unwanted catalogs.  instead of recycling or composting catalogs, the best way to save is to simply not get them to begin with.&lt;br  /&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Chas</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 09:44:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://blog.inc.com/archives/2005/03/the_mba_program.html</title><link>http://inc.disqus.com/httpbloginccomarchives200503the_mba_programhtml/#comment-18774069</link><description>I have a MBA, and I have yet to see any credible evidence that a person's education correlates to their ethical standards. I defy anyone on this board to provide the statistical evidence that proves this either way.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The argument about health insurance is also void of credible evidence. Throwing out the "44 million uninsured" is a Liberal blanket statement, and I think Tom and MBA did a better job analyzing the data. I am a technologist; one thing I do well is to look at "why" the numbers are as they are. I would think that someone with a PhD would be able to verify numbers and identify outliers. (No offense bud, but you really have not supported your numbers at all)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Regardless, having a MBA is irrelevant to the health care crisis, the issues go far beyond just the "44 million" as you must ask, and then ANSWER: why are the numbers so high?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I find that the Liberals use these numbers as a political war cry, and ignore the real statistics. They don't support tort reform, which is ONE of the many reasons health care costs are so high; so how can they be taken seriously? Having a MBA has nothing to do with this. The lawyers, as in Trial Law, make more money from lawsuits than Microsoft, Cisco, and they make twice as much money as Coca Cola. So whine about high healthcare costs, use this myopic 44 Million, and then DON'T support tort reform???? That is not the fault of the MBA.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Yes, China has a serious problem with illegal manufacturing and intellectual property infringement. But the MBA is not to blame for this, the criminals are. Yes, GM is the only one that has taken a chance on marketing cars in China, but it HAS paid off; regardless of the imitation products. No one can prove that GM is NOT making money from Buick in China.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Having an education has nothing to do with ethical standards. That's like saying it is the PhD's fault that the ORings failed on the shuttle or the insulation was the result of having an engineering degree. Come on, get real people.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Oh, since people use side notes here...how come some one with a PHD [sic] does not even know how to abbreviate his own credentials?????&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;br  /&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Chas</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 10 Mar 2005 06:04:45 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>