<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for Rosie</title><link>http://disqus.com/people/460d92a2c0cbf638ac5402836831d350/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2009 14:16:17 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Smallville &amp;#8216;Legion&amp;#8217; Mid-Season Return = Weak</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/smallville_8216legion8217_mid_season_return_weak/#comment-21646887</link><description>I'm surprised that some fans were expecting a final showdown between Clark and Doomsday this early in the season.  &lt;i&gt;The actor playing Doomsday is a regular on the show.&lt;/i&gt;  Chances are there won't be a final showdown until the end of the season.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The only thing I disliked about &lt;i&gt;"Legion"&lt;/i&gt; were the three future superheroes.  They were a bit annoying.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Rosie</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2009 14:16:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: &amp;#8220;They become their parents.&amp;#8221;</title><link>http://newcritics.disqus.com/8220they_become_their_parents8221/#comment-1384839</link><description>&lt;i&gt;"Maybe after their divorce they would have individually turned to other thingsÃ¢â‚¬â€œEst, fundamentalist Christianity, or scientologyÃ¢â‚¬Â¦Ã¢â‚¬â€œwhich also would have left them unfulfilled."&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;How do you know that?  How do you know any of these religions would have left Ben and Elaine unfulfilled?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Rosie</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 18:17:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Trapped in a Rat Pack Suit on a Soundstage, Looking for Grit</title><link>http://newcritics.disqus.com/trapped_in_a_rat_pack_suit_on_a_soundstage_looking_for_grit/#comment-2922041</link><description>What is this?  Critics are surprised that Jon Hamm lost the Best Actor Emmy to Bryan Cranston and are now trying to justify why he lost by comparing his acting skills - to his detriment - to James Gondolfino?  What hell is this?  Sometimes, the media really astounds me.  And sometimes they are full of crap.  Like now.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Rosie</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 15:10:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Movie Notes: Casino Royale (1967)</title><link>http://webomatica.disqus.com/movie_notes_casino_royale_1967/#comment-1750541</link><description>To my surprise, I didn't find the plot confusing at all.  I managed to follow the movie's story, until the last fight sequence inside the Casino Royale.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Rosie</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2007 17:13:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Best And Worst James Bond Films</title><link>http://webomatica.disqus.com/the_best_and_worst_james_bond_films/#comment-1750367</link><description>GOLDFINGER would have never made my list of favorite Bond movies.  In fact, I consider it to be my least favorite one.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Rosie</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2007 15:41:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Movie Notes: The World Is Not Enough</title><link>http://webomatica.disqus.com/movie_notes_the_world_is_not_enough/#comment-1750171</link><description>["Lastly, the villains and their nefarious plot is rather wimpy - no space satellites or world destruction - just the detonation of a single nuclear submarine to provide only one oil pipeline, of course controlled by the villains."]&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;You like those type of plots?  I find them ludicrous.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Rosie</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2007 17:11:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Book Notes: The Man Who Saved Britain: A Personal Journey Into The Disturbing World Of James Bond</title><link>http://webomatica.disqus.com/book_notes_the_man_who_saved_britain_a_personal_journey_into_the_disturbing_world_of_james_bond/#comment-1753466</link><description>Now I know that I will ignore Simon Winder's book if he's going to place all the blame for the movies' silliness on Roger Moore.  Especially since the silliness began with 1964's "GOLDFINGER".  But I guess he was too blinded by his adoration of Connery as Bond.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Rosie</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2007 14:43:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Missing Mr.Imperfect</title><link>http://thexxfactor.disqus.com/missing_mrimperfect/#comment-8682969</link><description>I LOVED your post.  Really!  I do.  I have this great fear that Craig's Bond will actually turn into "Mr. Perfect Guy/Spy" by his third movie.  God, I hope that does not happen.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Rosie</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2007 14:17:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Indiana Jones 4 Photos from Cine Live</title><link>http://slashfilm.disqus.com/indiana_jones_4_photos_from_cine_live/#comment-11198347</link><description>Nice pictures.  I don't see the problem with Shia LeBeouf.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Rosie</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2008 20:23:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Spider-Man 3: BEWARE of the Number 3!</title><link>http://filmschoolrejects.disqus.com/spider_man_3_beware_of_the_number_3/#comment-11389891</link><description>I think I prefer SPIDEY 2 and SPIDEY 3 to the first SPIDER-MAN movie.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Rosie</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2007 17:26:33 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>