DISQUS

What is this? Critics are surprised that Jon Hamm lost the Best Actor Emmy to Bryan Cranston and are now trying to justify why he lost by comparing his acting skills - to his detriment - to James Gondolfino? What hell is this? Sometimes, the media really astounds me. And sometimes they are full of crap. Like now.

"Maybe after their divorce they would have individually turned to other things–Est, fundamentalist Christianity, or scientology…–which also would have left them unfulfilled."


How do you know that? How do you know any of these religions would have left Ben and Elaine unfulfilled?

Nice pictures. I don't see the problem with Shia LeBeouf.

Now I know that I will ignore Simon Winder's book if he's going to place all the blame for the movies' silliness on Roger Moore. Especially since the silliness began with 1964's "GOLDFINGER". But I guess he was too blinded by his adoration of Connery as Bond.

I think I prefer SPIDEY 2 and SPIDEY 3 to the first SPIDER-MAN movie.

I LOVED your post. Really! I do. I have this great fear that Craig's Bond will actually turn into "Mr. Perfect Guy/Spy" by his third movie. God, I hope that does not happen.

["Lastly, the villains and their nefarious plot is rather wimpy - no space satellites or world destruction - just the detonation of a single nuclear submarine to provide only one oil pipeline, of course controlled by the villains."]

You like those type of plots? I find them ludicrous.

GOLDFINGER would have never made my list of favorite Bond movies. In fact, I consider it to be my least favorite one.

To my surprise, I didn't find the plot confusing at all. I managed to follow the movie's story, until the last fight sequence inside the Casino Royale.