<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for Adam Wearn</title><link>http://disqus.com/people/45af9328ee50b96d44bb89a8220ebb05/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 15:12:19 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Multi-Methods in factor</title><link>http://phildawesstuff.disqus.com/multi_methods_in_factor/#comment-2753752</link><description>I share your sentiment.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;All the while Factor is making it painful to use 'mainstream' languages as I get used to some of these basic abstractions!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Adam Wearn</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2008 04:18:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Phil Dawes Stuff &gt;&gt; Hand-coding multi-platform assembler using Factor compiler intrinsics</title><link>http://phildawesstuff.disqus.com/phil_dawes_stuff_hand_coding_multi_platform_assembler_using_factor_compiler_intrinsics/#comment-19598106</link><description>After reading this, I really can't wait for your next post on INSN: and CODEGEN: words.  I have some ideas that I want the compiler to emit (just learning experiments) but this really was a good tutorial on at least the intrinsics support.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Adam Wearn</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 15:12:19 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>