<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for marlee60</title><link>http://disqus.com/people/4502012c80893f8a7dba3d654839799b/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Apr 2008 10:03:27 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Big Oil Defends Profits</title><link>http://washingtonindependent.disqus.com/big_oil_defends_profits/#comment-1789069</link><description>&amp;quot;High profits in up-cycles, they said, are needed to fund development in down-cycles.&amp;quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I didn't see the hearings but this sounds like the same excuses they gave the last time. When was there a down-cycle for oil industry??? Is the panel just playing softball with these oil-moneybags? Did anybody question further about the down cycles? If there ever was downcycle, this time in history should be it. But no - historical record profits rolling in.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">marlee60</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 05 Apr 2008 10:03:27 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>